ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama camp downplaying expectations

Posted: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:03 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray and NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
With polls showing Obama making up a considerable amount of ground in key February 5 contests, there is a growing sense that he could pull off what was unthinkable just two or three weeks ago: grab more Feb. 5 delegates than Clinton. Heck, even win California.

Well, the Obama campaign just released a memo to rein in such expectations. "Senator Clinton is certainly the favorite on February 5, given the huge leads she has held in many of these contests throughout the course of the campaign and the political, historical and geographic advantages she enjoys in many of these states," Obama manager David Plouffe said in the memo. "Based on her huge head start, Hillary Clinton should still win California, but is unlikely to achieve her goal of getting a sizeable share of the delegates."

Plouffe continues, "Our path to the nomination never factored in a big day for us on February 5. Rather, we always planned to stay close enough in the delegate count so that we could proceed to individually focus on the states in the next set of contests. We fully expect Senator Clinton to earn more delegates on February 5th and also to win more states. If we were to be within 100 delegates on that day and win a number of states, we will have met our threshold for success and will be best positioned to win the nomination in the coming months."

That 100-delegate margin is an interesting mention. It's rare that campaigns establish benchmarks that journalists can hold them to later on, and Plouffe is vague on "a number of states'" which could mean seven or it could mean fifteen. But in providing a measure of success in terms of delegates, that's a good way to see if Obama can meet his own expectations game tomorrow night. That said, after playing with the delegate math a bit, a 100-delegate difference might be setting the bar a little too low.

The full Plouffe memo is below.

February 4, 2008
To: Interested Parties
From: David Plouffe
RE: Putting Tomorrow into Perspective

Two weeks ago, a Clinton campaign adviser told CBS News that they believed they could “wrap up” the nomination on February 5th. As the “inevitable” national frontrunner, tomorrow should be the day when she sews up the nomination or builds a formidable delegate lead. But because of Obama’s growing momentum across the country, the Clinton campaign is now unlikely to reach their stated goals of wrapping up the nomination tomorrow.

Senator Clinton is certainly the favorite on February 5, given the huge leads she has held in many of these contests throughout the course of the campaign and the political, historical and geographic advantages she enjoys in many of these states.

For example, California, which Clinton led by 25 points in October and 12 points two weeks ago, was once seen as the Clinton campaign’s firewall and where they planned to run up an insurmountable lead in delegates. Former Governor Gray Davis, a Clinton supporter, said on MSNBC last week, “I am pleased to be for Hillary Clinton and I expect her to do very well in Super Tuesday. I expect her to win California by a sizable amount, at least double digits, do well in New York and New Jersey and Connecticut.”

Based on her huge head start, Hillary Clinton should still win California, but is unlikely to achieve her goal of getting a sizeable share of the delegates.

Our path to the nomination never factored in a big day for us on February 5.  Rather, we always planned to stay close enough in the delegate count so that we could proceed to individually focus on the states in the next set of contests.

We fully expect Senator Clinton to earn more delegates on February 5th and also to win more states. If we were to be within 100 delegates on that day and win a number of states, we will have met our threshold for success and will be best positioned to win the nomination in the coming months.

A performance that exceeds those benchmarks, while unlikely, would put is in a surprisingly strong position heading into the rest of the February contests.

While the Clinton campaign is furiously trying to spin the expectations game, it is important to look at where they were in some of the key states just a few weeks ago.

ALABAMA
Less Than Two Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led Alabama By 15 Points. According to polling done by Rasmussen released on January 25, Clinton led Obama by 15 points, 43% to 28%. [Rasmussen, 1/25/08]

ARIZONA
Less Than Two Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led Arizona Obama By 21 Points. According to a poll done for the Arizona Republic that was released on January 23, Clinton led Obama 45% to 24%. [Arizona Republic, 1/23/08]

CONNECTICUT
Hartford Courant: Two Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led Connecticut By 14 Points. According to polling done for the Hartford Courant released on January 20, Clinton led Obama by 14 points, 41% to 27%. [Hartford Courant, 1/20/08]

DELAWARE
October 2007 Poll Found Clinton Leading Obama By 24 Points. According to polling done by Farleigh Dickinson that was released on October 10, Clinton led Obama by 24 points, 41% to 17%. [Fairleigh Dickinson, 10/10/07]

GEORGIA
In December 2007, Clinton Led Georgia By 7 Points. According to polling done by Strategic Vision released on December 12, Clinton led Obama by 7 points, 34% to 27%. [Strategic Vision, 1/22/07]

MASSACHUSETTS
Survey USA: Two Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led Massachusetts By 37 Points. According to polling done by Survey USA released on January 24, Clinton led Obama by 37 points, 59% to 22%. [Survey USA, 1/24/08]

MINNESOTA
October Poll Found Clinton Leading Obama By 25 Points In Minnesota. According to polling done by Mason Dixon released on October 2, Clinton led Obama 47%-33%. [Star Tribune, 10/2/07]

MISSOURI
Less Than Two Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led Missouri By 19 Points. According to polling done by Rasmussen released on January 25, Clinton led Obama by 19 points, 43% to 24%. [Rasmussen, 1/25/08]

NEW YORK
Before February 5th, Clinton Led New York By 28 Points. According to polling done by USA Today and Gallup released on January 28, Clinton led Obama by 28 points, 56% to 28%. [Gallup, 1/28/08]

NEW JERSEY
Less Than Two Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led New Jersey By 17 Points. According to polling done by Quinnipiac released on January 22, Clinton led Obama by 17 points, 49% to 32%. [Quinnipiac, 1/23/08]

OKLAHOMA
Three Weeks Before February 5th, Clinton Led Oklahoma By 20 Points. According to polling done by Survey USA released on January 14, Clinton led Obama by 20 points, 45% to 25%. [Survey USA, 1/14/08]

TENNESSEE
Less Than One Week Before February 5th, Clinton Led Tennessee By 33 Points. According to polling done by Insider Advantage in Tennessee on January 30th, Clinton led Obama by 33 points, 59% to 26%. [Insider Advantage, 1/30/08]

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

What it comes down to for Dems is simple.

Despite the back-and-forth between the candidates, there is basically zero policy difference between Hillary and Obama.  Either will represent the party tenets well in the general election, and both are a huge improvement on Bush.

But, fair or not, the right wing hates Clinton and all she stands for.  And while I think their characterization of her is unfair, the bottom line formula:

Barack vs. McCain = election becomes about the past versus future, referendum on the War, and a battle for the independents, which Barack would win.

Hilary vs. McCain = election becomes a referendum on the Clintons, and while Republicans won't like voting for McCain, they will come out in droves to vote AGAINST Hillary.  McCain trumps Hillary on experience and grabs the independents to win.

So any Democrat who wants to see Republicans in the White House for another 4 years, feel free to support Hillary.
Now is the time for take back the white house, I know that if Hillary is the Nomination the Democrats will lose the white house,hard core Republican don't like her and if they think that there will be a other clinton in the white house they will come out and vote aganist her, but Obama can bring the I/R to the his side and that is the only way that we will take back are House. I hope very body understands the meaning of Change. We can't go back, A Vote for Obama is a Vote for the Furture...
IDONT THINK THIS WILL BE SHOWNBUT IF OBAMA IS A KENNEDY THEN MAYBE HE WILL GET DRUNK AND DRIVE CAR IN THE WATER AND KILLHIS GIRLFRIEND LIKE TED KENNEDY DID AND MAYBE HE WILL HAVE A MOVIE STAR THAT HE IS SEEING LIKE BOB AND JOHN DID WITH MARYLIN MONROE AND A LOT WAS SAID THAT THEY HAD HER DONE IN AND I WAS AKENNEDY PERSON TIL TED CAME OUT FOR OBAMA AND ITOOK A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT THE KENNEDYS HAVE DONE AND IT SCARES ME IF OBAMA IS  LIKE THEM
In Colorado we will caucus tomorrow night, the republicans have ten locations here in Littleton, the democrats have only one. There will be masses of people at Euclid Middle School tomorrow, and I believe that Obama will carry the day!
please vote for barack!
Why won't the media take on board the Clinton White House records!? The records may well contain information that would give voters insight into both her political philosophy and character. Since she is running for the highest office in the US,Voters have the right to expect the releasing of everythings possible about her records subject to national security.
They could relate to her role (if any) in such scandals as TRAVELGATE and the Marc Rich pardon, plus policy disputes over health care, Welfare reform and Social security. This is reminiscent of Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign, when he refused torelease his tax records prior to 1980. That disclosure cutoff date was no accident. As the American people learned only after that election, 1978 and 1979 were the tax years when the Clintons reported income on her miraculous and highly embarrassing trades in cattle futures.The archives and records should be given access if she has nothing to hide, before it is too late. What are the Obama camps waiting to attack her dodgy past records?  M kone.
When the time comes to pull the lever in the privacy of the voting booth, I'm wondering how many white male dems, who say they'll vote for Obama or Clinton, will actually opt for McCain?
Dems won't get 90 percent of the AA vote if Hillary is the nominee. Not saying that she can't win without it, but the Clinton campaign has alienate AA voters. There are no longer a guarantee for the Dems.
I truly believe that Barack Obama is on his way to the nomination.  He is READY on Day 1 and more importantly RIGHT on Day 1.  I am not sure what will happen tomorrow.  I think at worst it is going to be a draw, especially in delegates.  

I think he has a chance to win CA.  My only concern is in early voters which are going to trend towards HRC.

The momentum is his and it is going to take him a win tomorrow, win the nomination, and win the presidency.

He inspires me to be better and make CHANGE.

OBAMA 08!!
The comment below is EXACTLY why I'm voting Obama tomorrow. Clinton supporters you HAVE to think about November.  Obviously a good part of her criticism is totally unfair and unwarranted, but it's there. And getting a dem in the White House is the MOST important thing, more important than Hillary's and her supporters' ambitions.  Obama would win in Nov, Hillary might win, might lose in Nov. Why take that chance??!!  Vote Obama.

"Remember, it's all about November.

A vote for Hillary = a vote for McCain.  If Hillary is the nominee, McCain is president. Why? She simply cannot get the Independent or Swing voters. Too much baggage, fair or not.

Obama, on the other hand, has wide, crossover appeal and can get those coveted Independent and swing voters -- which are necessary and key to a White House victory.

Vote Obama in your primary or caucus if you want something other than the same ol' Republicanism for another four years.

Think. Think November strategy. Vote Obama."
DOWNPLAY OBAMA' EXPECTATIONS???
OBAMA WINS us loses. . CLINTONS win US loses-AND NO INTERNET to bail the narcissist out this time.

McCAIN IS SCARY STUPID. . .

MORMONS don't spend half their services slamming the Pope-because they don't need CATHOLICS like PROTESTANTS DO.

VOTE FOR MITT. Bright and liberals/con born agains DON'T LIKE HIM!!!
I WAS ONCE Catholic and found this BORN AGAIN CHURCH  to my 'so as not to brag' liking.

I WAS NEVER CATHOLIC-and found the MORMON CHURCH. . .

vote for MITT.
How sad, I was watching a room full of Democrats on the Hannity and Colmes show and when the Obama supporters were asked by Hannity what accomplishment Obama had, not one was able to answer.  The majority of people voting for Obama are a bunch of followers.  Most don’t know what he has done.  Everyone mentions he is a good speaker and that he inspires people.... What?  Sorry, but our country needs much more that inspiration.  But then again when the same group of people were asked who had the most experience they all voted for Hillary.  I don’t get it, what do these people need to hear to realize that the best candidate is Hillary.  
Miss Hilaryous, Newport RI, get your facts straight, I know it's hard after listening to Obama's no-facts speeches, but the fact that Obama and Edwards were not on the MICH ballot was THEIR DOING, Their names were on the FL. ballot!   MMMMMmmmmmmmm.....HRC WON BOTH, GET OVER IT
Baaarack Obbaaaamaaaa!!
Baaraack Obaaaammmaaa!!
I'm just trying the written equivalent of Stevie Wonder's rendition :)
Now the whole of America (other than Clintonites - which sounds like Kryptonite) knows who to sing and vote for!
The increasing popularity and strength of Obama Acroos  the state is a clear indication something joyful n beautiful is about to happen to the people of American n even beyond.i have a very deep conviction that Obama will emeerge victorious by the close of the day. Go Obama Go for Victory  Go for gold
I am just sick and tired of the Clinton's and Bush's. And to top it all off, Hillary was in lock step with W in the Iraq invasion.  To me, Hillary represents the old way of thing in the Democratic party.  A thinking that says that a Democrat must be just a tough going to war as a Republican. Although Hillary is smart--there is no doubt about that--still she is divisive.  I can not see but four more years of gridlock in Washington if she is re-elected as president--uups!--must have been thinking of Bill.  
I think that this is a smart strategy by the Obama campaign.  People generally like rooting for the underdog.  If Obama can keep his supporters thinking that every vote counts, then they will show up. He has younger supporters than Hillary.  These people don't have as much free time as Hillary's older voter.  So, Obama must get them to make the sacrifice and go vote.  
Doesn't Matter who wins today, MSNBC and alike will spin it for Obama anyways. He does not have to do it. Most prominent of them will be Mika, Joe , Chris ..etc..... Yeah right !! Place for Politics.. Should be place for Obama news


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=636846

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google