ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Some good GOP news

Posted: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:16 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Finally, some good GOP news: It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the Republican Party is heading into a general election where it’s at a clear disadvantage -- whether we’re talking about generic ballot tests, fundraising, Iraq and the economy, or turnout so far in this year’s nominating contests. But with Romney’s departure from the GOP race yesterday, coupled with the perception that Obama and Clinton will continue battling at least for a couple more months, the GOP finally has some good news to tout: It appears to have its nominee months before the Democrats will. And this time is an opportunity to heal wounds, raise money, and reorganize for the general election battle ahead. The Democrats -- with all of their advantages -- might not have that same opportunity. Think about this stat, by the way: There is more time in between the last primary (Puerto Rico) and the start of the Dem convention (approx. 80 days) than there is from the end of that convention to the November general election (approx. 60 days).

*** A note of caution, however: While everyone is proclaiming McCain the presumptive nominee after Romney’s exit, the GOP race still isn’t over. And do remember that McCain has never been a good front-runner -- he has always seemed to trip up when in that position. Huckabee is still in the race, and his last stand is Virginia. He may not say it, but it's pretty obvious when one looks at the potential Republican electorate. Should many indies and moderate Republicans decide their vote is better spent in the Dem primary, then Huckabee's passionate evangelical supporters could be enough to keep things close. What does McCain do now? For one, he can't completely act like he's taking the nomination (and conservatives) for granted. He should do what he can to put Huckabee away for good on Tuesday. A big win by McCain over Huckabee in Virginia will do just that. The thing McCain has left to fear from conservatives who aren't on board yet is a third party challenge, and that happens if he pokes conservatives in the eye or ignores them too quickly and moves too fast to the center.

*** The streak might be broken: With Romney bowing out of the race, the chances of a sitting senator winning the presidency in November are now extremely high, NBC’s Andy Merten notes. Barring the highly unlikely surge by Huckabee (a governor) or the entrance and success by a third-party contender (say Bloomberg), either McCain, Obama, or Clinton will probably win in November -- the first time in nearly 50 years a sitting senator has won the presidency, since JFK. Something else worth pointing out: If McCain and Clinton both end up winning the nods, it will be the first time we can remember both nominees being outspent in the primaries.

*** Dictating the pace of the game: Is Obama the front-runner? Maybe not, but the fact that he's dictating the terms of when the candidates debate and he is the fundraising leader, he's on the verge. The only thing missing: an overall delegate lead and a national primary poll lead. Clinton needs to stop him from that because if his momentum ever gets to the point where he looks like the national front-runner in the polls, everything else will only cement him. Another example of Obama dictating the race: his semi-call yesterday for the Clintons to release their tax returns after the $5 million loan, which led to a slew of stories today examining their wealth. But the Clinton folks had to know this would be the result of their decision to spend their own money. After all, the Clintons have only accumulated their wealth since Bill Clinton left the presidency. By the way, can the Clinton campaign get away with their promise to wait to release their tax returns after the primary season?

*** Another busy weekend: If you thought that there were no contests between Super Tuesday and Chesapeake Tuesday on Feb. 12, think again. This weekend, there are a total of five Democratic races, and a combined 185 delegates are at stake in them. In fact, it’s worth noting that this delegate amount is 48 more than were at stake before February 5. On Saturday, Louisiana (primary), Nebraska (caucuses), the Virgin Islands (territorial convention), and Washington State (caucuses) hold nominating contests. And Maine (caucuses) goes on Sunday. The GOP also holds contests in Kansas, Louisiana, and Washington. A preview of these races is below…

*** Loopholes donkeys could fit through: Journalists are not lawyers or mediators or referees. Unfortunately, particularly with regard to the situation surrounding Michigan and Florida's delegates, we've had to play the part, in some respects, of all three. We pride ourselves on trying to make the complicated clear. And for those of us who attended the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting months ago, most of us thought the rules were abundantly clear. It went something like this: you knew the rules; you broke the rules; you get one last chance (30 days to figure out how to abide by the rules), and if you don't, you are punished. Now we learn that through what essentially amounts to loopholes and legalese, Florida and Michigan could be given another chance. There's talk that if they hold caucuses or something similar, then their delegates could potentially be seated and have full voting privileges. But just asking: Isn't it Parenting (or Teaching) 101 that you shouldn't set consequences you can't follow through on? Because when your child (or student)-- given clear expectations and consequences from the beginning -- breaks the agreed-to rules and you don't follow through, don't you lose credibility?
 
*** On the trail: Clinton is in Washington State, where she stumps in Tacoma and Spokane; Huckabee holds rallies across Kansas; McCain campaigns in Virginia, Kansas, and Washington State; and Obama attends a rally in Seattle, WA before traveling back to Chicago.

Countdown to Chesapeake Tuesday: 4 days
Countdown to Ohio and Texas: 25 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 270 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 347 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.   
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.  

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Some people seem to find some sort of conflict between Barack’s message of change and his welcoming old guard politicians like Ted Kennedy to his campaign.  You knuckleheads still don’t quite get it, do you?  Barack intends to send the folks who are determined to fight off to the sidelines, while a majority of Americans come together to solve problems.  How does it follow that he has to exclude established politicians if we are trying to bring people together?  I certainly hope Barack is a politician himself, or he is wasting my time.  I’m counting on him to not only be a politician, but a shrewd one.  He hasn’t let me down yet.
The only thing missing: an overall delegate lead and a national primary poll lead.

HAHA these are the two things that he needs the most....
JAycee, he hasnt done a thing one way or another to " let you down" so that comment is inane. No one has done anything to let anyone down.

It is my belief that Howard Dean will maneuver a deal with these two and Clinton will bow out gracefully. then either that idiot hawk McCAin will win ( because if you dont think Hillary Clinton can over come him, think again) or Somehow Obama squeaks it out and then we can all sit back and say ok, what are you going to do now???
I found Peggy Noonan's article compelling, for I too, believe Barack Obama has a real shot at this thing. But I'm not hearing this from the pundits. I can't tell if they're all downplaying the significance of his wins on Tuesday or perhaps I'm just missing something?

I thought he did a trememdous job on Tuesday. But that's not what I'm hearing.
I agree with jaycee.  Is Obama supposed to denounce Kennedy's and Kerry's endorsements?  To say publically that he neither wants, nor needs their support.  Be realistic here.  

I also question the assumption that McCain's apparent clutch of the nomination will put him in better stead than the Democratic nominee come November.  I think a real, down-to-the-wire contest between Obama and Clinton could actually serve to excite and politicize Democrats and independents rather than destroy the eventual nominee.
The only thing missing: an overall delegate lead and a national primary poll lead.

HAHA these are the two things that he needs the most....

Lynette, NYC (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 9:34 AM)

Well Lynette, at the end of February, he will have the overall delegate lead. And I disagree with the fact that either of them need a national primary poll lead. You should get your "HAHA"s in while you can.
This is how the Clintons get themselves in trouble every single time.  By not releasing income information, she will resurrect every old memory of her almost pathological need for privacy.  Her inability to see that she needs to show every effort to be honest and aboveboard is what will cost her the election, and why a lot of us are very tired of the Clintons.

So to all you Clinton supporters, fair question...why won't Senator Clinton release tax returns?  Senator Obama has....and that my friends is the difference between the two campaigns.
Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton  she will NOT vote but if its a McCAin vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCAin. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.
Listen if Obama gets the democratic nomination, I will vote for him in Novemeber, but until that time, I am entitled to be in favor of the candidate I choose. Barack Obama is all talk and his rock star mantra is amazing. its BLAH BLAH BLAH to me. Its too bad that the media has crowned him their golden boy and the obamaites are flocking. I just hope its all worth it.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120241915915951669.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries --
Mr. Obama's achievement on Super Tuesday was solid and reinforced trend lines. The popular vote was a draw, the delegate count a rough draw, but he won 13 states, and when you look at the map he captured the middle of the country from Illinois straight across to Idaho, with a second band, in the northern Midwest, of Minnesota and North Dakota. He won Missouri and Connecticut, in Mrs. Clinton's backyard. He won the Democrats of the red states.
...
He is the brilliant young black man as American dream. No consultant, no matter how opportunistic and hungry, will think it easy--or professionally desirable--to take him down in a low manner. If anything, they've learned from the Clintons in South Carolina what that gets you.
...
Mrs. Clinton would be easier for Republicans. With her cavalcade of scandals, they'd be delighted to go at her. They'd get medals for it. Consultants would get rich on it.

The Democrats have it exactly wrong. Hillary is the easier candidate, Mr. Obama the tougher. Hillary brings negative; it's fair to hit her back with negative. Mr. Obama brings hope, and speaks of a better way. He's not Bambi, he's bulletproof.
XXXXXXXXXXX
It doesn't matter what McCain or the GOP do to try and unify their base, the GOP Pundits have spoken. They will not support McCain for betraying their party. The DEMS will win the White House in Nov. McCain is DOA before their convention even begins.
Well, whoever wins the Vice-Presidency will have some pretty big shoes to fill.  I just heard our idiot President say, at the CPAC gathering, that Cheney was the "best Vice President in history">  

I'm still laughing.  I'm also still hopeing whoever gets the final nod on the GOP side asks Bush to campaign for him.

What a loser!!
Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton  she will NOT vote but if its a McCAin vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCAin. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.

Lynette, NYC (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 9:52 AM)

It's an observation based on one example. What is that - 1/300,000,000 of the population? Sounds like a winner to me.
The Clintons should release their tax records NOW!! If they don't it will become a HUGE issue - not just during the primaries, but in the general election if she gets the nomination. We Democrats need to project TRANSPARENCY. I was for John Edwards. Have been leaning towards Obama. I will DEFINITELY vote FOR OBAMA if Hillary stonewalls on this tax issue. WHAT IS SHE HIDING??? It IS a real issue now that she is SELF-FINANCING her campaign. RELEASE YOUR TAX RECORDS HILLARY!!!
I hope the state of Virginia votes for Huckabee and sends John McCain a message that the country doesn't
need another arrogant, angry republican in the white house.

A McCain administration is equal to giving George Bush a third term.
to all the clinton fans, if the clintons have nothing to hide and their finances are on the 'up and up' why won't they release their tax returns for all to see? seems odd doesn't it?
I am so tired of the MSNBC/OBAMA network.  This is the only news station that has Obama winning the delegate count.  CNN, FOX, AP, etc.. all have Hillary ahead.  How is this possible?  It is so frustrating hearing everyone from Matthews to Olberman, Tucker, etc. just keep bashing and slandering Hillary every chance they get.  I wonder when she wins the nomination if they will all take the Ann Coulter stance and switch party lines because of how much they are Clinton haters..  We are all democrats here stupid....We need the white house in 08.  I can't wait until Hillary gets the nomination.
Has everyone seen the latest TIME poll which shows  McCain vs. Hillary as a tie, but has Obama beating McCain by 6 opoints? Other polls are showing the same trend. Obama is definitely the best hope for the Democrats in 2008. This is a no-brainer. Conservatives may not love McCain, but they despise Hillary. Not liking someone as much as the GOP does not like Hillary can be a great motivator. Democrats, we would be very foolish to put up the Clintons vs. McCain. We need to nominate Barack Obama!
Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, Jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton  she will NOT vote but if its a McCain vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCain. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.
Lynette, NYC (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 9:52 AM)

---------------------------------------------------
You are definitely on to something Lynette, most definitely.
Karl Rove and Sean Hannity on McCain wanting to face Hillary in the fall:

HANNITY: Karl, am I right in my thinking that if I'm John McCain, I would rather go up against Hillary than Barack Obama? We're short on time.

ROVE: Yes, absolutely. Everybody knows who she is and has strong opinions about her.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/karl_rove_on_the_democratic_race.html

Obama's the electable one.  Republicans acknowledge it -- Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Peggy Noonan, George Will and many others.
WE WANT TO KNOW WHY SENATOR CLINTON, WILL NOT RELEASE HER TAX RETURNS ?
The fact that so many Democratic voters who admire and respect both Hillary and Bill Clinton can't stomach the thought of them moving back into the White House should give the Clinton's and the Democractic Party pause.

If you can't get a majority of the people who like and respect you to support your candidacy, that is a MAJOR CLUE  about her chances in the general election.

Do the math: Huckabee does not have a chance, period.
Against Clinton or Obama, MCCAIN will win handsdown. Why? He is the stronger, more experianced, credible, leader we have to choose from. Differances aside, MCCAIN is the only one that will show the right change and make the appropriate *less tax* progress.
Hillary's 35 years of 'experience' includes:
Monica Lewinski
Gennifer Flowers
Juanita Broaddrick rape
Kathleen Willey rape
Whitewater
Cattle futures
Rose Law firm
TravelGate
HairCutGate
the NAFTA sell out
the WTO sell out
the Millenium Communications bill
Vincent Foster
Buddist Fund raising
Norman Hsu
Johnny Treu
Peter Paul
Marc Rich
Voting for the Iraq War
Voting for Kyl/Lieberman
Voting AGAAINST the cluster bomb ban
yada, yada, tada....

That's some interesting 'EXPERIENCE' Billary

I'm also hearing that Senator Obama is going to win the next 7 or 8 contests. Doesn't anyone take a minute and wonder why these are automatic wins for Obama? How significant is this?

And what does this say about Senator Clinton? Her support doesn't appear to be too vast in this country, considering she had a huge lead for a long, long time.
kick back and watch the clinton machine go into hyperdrive, people in overcoats in dark allies exchanging envelopes of cash, hopefully not to many people will 'come up missing', obama has the people behind him, but the superdelegates are the establishment through and through, and hillary has already committed to keep their trough full, will they have the gall to vote against the will of the people? most likely
I am so tired of the MSNBC/OBAMA network.  This is the only news station that has Obama winning the delegate count.  CNN, FOX, AP, etc.. all have Hillary ahead.  How is this possible?  It is so frustrating hearing everyone from Matthews to Olberman, Tucker, etc. just keep bashing and slandering Hillary every chance they get.  I wonder when she wins the nomination if they will all take the Ann Coulter stance and switch party lines because of how much they are Clinton haters..  We are all democrats here stupid....We need the white house in 08.  I can't wait until Hillary gets the nomination.
Kevin, Tavernier, FL (Sent Friday, February 08, 2008 10:07 AM)
------------------------------------------------
Kevin, the people who OWN the media are not DEMOCRATS!
The guys who report need to keep their jobs, they must do as they are told, KILL HILLARY.
Got it? They have no pride and no credibility.  They had to do the same when the WAR was the push of the day.  They are relentless. They are afraid.
I just wanted to thank the people of Iowa for giving Conservatives John McCain.  Way to think it through Iowa!  If you had done your job we would have Mitt Romney as our candidate.  I am now and forever will be a Romney Republican.  ROMNEY 2012.
Bottom line for Democrats:

If we want to win in the fall we need to nominate Barack Obama.

He can energize Democrats. Hillary and Bill have alienated many Dems, including me. I'll sit this one out if Hillary is the nominee. Too nasty a campaign for my tastes.

He can appeal to Independents. Hillary unlikely to win many, if any.

He can appeal to some in the GOP. Hillary can't. She unites the GOP for McCain!

So, if we want to win, the math is easy. 30% of people are Democrats. 30% are GOP voters. 30% are Independents. To win, a candidate must get votes from all three groups. McCain can. Obama can. Hillary cannot.

Therefore, Obama should be the Democratic nominee.
Now, the 'experienced' candidate is John McCain

The anti war candidate is Barack Obama

The pro war candidate is John McCain

The candidate who FLIP FLOPPED on war is Billary
She was pro war befor she was anti war

Want experience ? Vote for Joh McCain
Want wisdom and judgement ? Vote for Barack Obama
Want an opportunist ? Bring back Billary
I have put together a basic chart of the most recent delegate allocations from every February 5th voting state. There are only 70 delegates outstanding right now, and you should check out these numbers which are very hard to find in most websites at this point: http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2008/02/february-5th-delegate-count.html
Unless the Huckster's God obligingly strikes McCain dead, it's mathematically impossible for him to get more delegates than McWars. Period.  He can, however, try to jockey for a Veep position, but there are lots of right-wing zealots who do't even consider Hucklebury to be idealogically pure enough. And he'l have to contend with the loss of Crazy Annie Coulter, who has publically promised to campaign for Hillary (assuming Hil's the nominee, thus making a bigger ass out of her and herself) if McWars is the nominee; what a loss to the Republican Party!
As for the debate thing, yeah, Clinton sounds like an also-ran squealing for yet more boring-ass debates, and Obama ought to continue to act like the frontrunner.  As for Michegan and Florida, remember that the press (at least) conclded that caucuses favored Obama, because no one wanted to look like a racist by voting for lily-white Hillary.  So let them caucus...although I agree, it makes te DNC, and by extension, their nominee, look weak in handling---oh, let's say, Iran a year or two down the line. Otherwise, I say, send in the clowns and let them caucus, as it will probably help Obamarama more than Hilarity.
Though the real election is nine months away, Sen. Barack Obama would fare slightly better than Sen. Hillary Clinton in a head to head match-up with Sen. John McCain if the general election were held today, a new TIME poll reveals.

Obama captured 48% of the vote in the theoretical match-up against McCain's 41%, the TIME poll reported, while Clinton and McCain would deadlock at 46% of the vote each. Put another way, McCain looks at the moment to have a narrowly better chance of beating the New York Senator than he does the relative newcomer from Illinois.

The difference, says Mark Schulman, CEO of Abt SRBI, which conducted the poll for TIME, is that "independents tilt toward McCain when he is matched up against Clinton But they tilt toward Obama when he is matched up against the Illinois Senator." Independents, added Schulman, "are a key battleground."
Obama is a motivational speaker, yes.  If you actually listen to him he is very inspirational.  So is my preacher and he is not qualified to be the President of the US.  His words have no substance.  It's all about change change change, blah, blah, blah.  I want the person who is going to be ready to tackle the horror of the White House after 7 years of you know what.  I really hope that he accepts the challenge for the debates and is not a coward.  We need to see more of him and what he is about.  I hope he is not a coward
Just an observation from the other side, My staunchly conservative, religious, Jewish boss has proclaimed that if the its McCain vs Clinton  she will NOT vote but if its a McCain vs Obama vote, she will vote for McCain. Its interesting to hear how the conservatives are thinking. They HATE McCain representing their party, and the supposedly vilified left wing Clinton is easier for them swallow then Obama. The conservatives may come out in full swing for McCain rather than allow obama to win. Its just an observation.

We've heard of a Jewish woman finding a Clinton easier to swallow before this election cycle.
Ron, Tx: Can you tell - does Senator Obama have a chance at being competitive with Senator Clinton in Texas?
WE WANT TO KNOW WHY SENATOR OBAMA, WILL NOT DEBATE SENATOR CLINTON ?
If you decide NOT to vote for the Democratic nominee...

It's IMPORTANT TO VOTE, ANYWAY

If the party splits on the Presidential nominee
we NEED TO WIN THE HOUSE AND SENATE

If you don't want to vote for the eventual nominee
skip that race, but vote for the 'down ticket' races


Vote Progressive, vote Democratic

I won't vote for Billary after the 'race baiting'
They've sunk too low for me
Not even, Clinton-Obama

But, I will still vote
And, I'll vote for Democrats in state and local elections and for ballot propositions

Hopefully, clinton and Obama supporters can agree on this

The thought of a Republican President with a Republican Senate and a Republican House is a nightmare scenario

Clinton and Obama supporters seem to be playing 'chicken' with each other in saying they won't support the other candidate.....

FINE, but vote Democratic in the OTHER RACES

IT'S IMPORTANT !!


If you want to know why Senator Obama will not debate, Senator Clinton. We'll it's because he's afraid America will see him for what he is. "Not having the experience/knowledge to lead this great Nation at this time in our history.
Lynette,

You must have the pulse of all the Republicans in America.  You think that because your boss would vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee all Republicans would.  You must feel proud to have a boss that represents such a large cross-section of America.  I guess I should just give up and not even vote since your staunchly conservative, religiou, jewish boss is going to vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee.  Thanks for the information.
Obama is a community organizer not the President of the United States, he has no experience and this country will go to hell in a hand basket, look what happened with the incompetence of Bush, and you all voted for him because you wanted to have a beer with him.  Now you want to vote for someone who can preach, we don't need a preacher we need a President who is smart and tough and that's Hillary whether you people like her or not!!
"By the way, can the Clinton campaign get away with their promise to wait to release their tax returns after the primary season?"

No. And, by that, I mean "No".
Oh no, not MORE secrecy from the Clintons! If she doesn't release her tax records now this is going to become another in a long line of cover-ups by the Clintons. She opened this door by writing herself a check for 5 million dollars. This is just more fodder for the GOP. Democrats, are we going to let this secretive couple RUIN our chances for victory in the fall? Can't you just see the GOP smiling and rubbing their hands together with glee at the thought of Hillary as the nominee? It isn't rocket science, folks. The history of Hillary and Bill will be a treasure trove for the GOP. And this latest tax return issue is just another example. We Democrats will get just what we deserve - President John McCain - if we are so self-defeating that we nominate Hillary Clinton.  
Why do people think Obama is a tougher candidate for McCain? I don't see somebody who is as vocal, headstron as McCain "laying down" for Obama. However, to some degree, McCain will face just what Clinton has which is that legitimate questions, comments are twisted to seem racial or attacking. Because of his race, it seems some have placed Obama in a "glass house". I also think that's part of why the media only shows positives about him. Before some of you Obama supporters come unglued, please be honest with yourselves. He is not a saint; he is not perfect. He should be subjected to the same scrutiny as other candidates.
David Shuster interviews Slick Willie:

'...DAVID SHUSTER: Bill, there's just something a little bit unseemly to me that Chelsea's out there calling up celebrities, saying support my mom, and she's apparently also calling these super delegates.

BILL PRESS: Hey, she's working for her mom. What's unseemly about that? During the last campaign, the Bush twins were out working for their dad. I think it's great, I think she's grown up in a political family, she's got politics in her blood, she loves her mom, she thinks she'd make a great president --

SHUSTER: But doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?...'


Shuster: Chelsea's Being 'Pimped Out'

Now that you mention it, yes it is weird

The Tax returns...Hum....

Well no matter how much people like the Clinton's these are the types of things that make them come across a little less than transparent - also making Chelsea call the Superdelegates to ask for support is strange. It seems slightly creepy to me - is Obama suppose to have his young daughters start calling super delegates?....it seems like they are pimping her out politically.....

Kevin in FL: CNN, FOX and AP are adding the Super Delegates (Which they have to take the various campaigns word on)& which can switch sides (You apparently have not been paying attention to the details....) MSNBC is listing the totals each candidate has actually won to date....

Looks like Michigan will hold a Caucus as African Americans Democrats there have been pressuring the local party to actually be able to vote....

Florida on the other hand is suppose to speak to the credentials committee (Cheaper than a 2nd election) which will be made up of a Clinton and Obama group that should vote to split those delegates based on the popular vote of all states that have voted.

Anyone want to weigh in?
About Hillary's reason for not releasing her tax returns....here's the reason....Bill has brokered a multi-million dollar deal with the Dubai Port Authority .....not too very long ago....suddenly Hillary is able to "loan" her campaign millions....this information came from one of the commentators on the FOX News channel....wonder how she will repay the Saudi's if she gets to be president?   As for us Republicans, we will stand behind the Republican candidate no matter who that person is, because the country cannot withstand a democratic Congress and a democratic President....
McCain!?
Let's get real. Only a few people walking around wearing blinders think that G.Bush has done a good job. All the others (Rep. and Dems.) know how much damage he has done as PTOS. We need someone who is not wearing blinders to get into the White House. Be honest...isn't McCain just going to follow in Bush's footsteps? Do the majority of Americans want more of that guy?
From Campaign Diaries:

'...Total of pledged delegates allocated on February 5th:

Clinton: 817 delegates
Obama:   796
Outstanding: 70


Total of pledged delegates, including Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina:


Clinton: 865 delegates
Obama:   859

Outstanding: 70

The count is agonizingly close and will change as states finish reporting their delegate attributions. It is clear that Super Tuesday resolved nothing and that we are in this for the long-run. As Politico's Ben Smith wrote yesterday: "Indiana and N.C. vote on May 6, which may be the new April 22, after April 22 becomes the new March 4, which is already the new Feb. 5."...'


Too close to call
It's time for Obama to start talking about POCKET BOOK ISSUES

Social Security, Health care, taxes, education
THAT will bring in women, blue collar and Latino voters

Use the financial edge you have to start advertizing in Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania

SOCK IT TO ME !!
The media is lazy, misleading and flat often times because they won't do the hard work.

Super Tuesday results were simply a clear victory for the Dems and Obama.  The Dems won the turnout numbers and Obama closed the gap and actually won the final delegate count.  He did you say, check the final count.  Folks try to spin it for Clinton, but how did she do?  She won a lot of delegates from NY, her adopted home state.  Okay!  She also won Cali and a bunch of delegates.  Facts are facts, close to 50% of the voters voted in Cali shortly after New Hampshire, which Clinton won.  She had a 20 percentage point lead in Cali going into SC.    If true, then Obama picked a 2:1 margin on election day, which pretty much matched the final day polls.

Instead we get fragmented discussions about absentee ballots and results.  Obama closed an incredible gap in a very short amount of time.  Unfortunately, the media was talking about the SC results two days after the election instead of focusing on Super Tuesday.  As we go forward, Obama will probably inch ahead State by State, but because of the proportionality it will be impossible for anyone candidate to close this out.  With that Hillary will argue for Michigan and Florida delegates to count in her count.  While I understand her position, she wants to win, the argument shows a lack of class on her and Bill's part given the fact that they signed on to the party rule to not count these delegates.  Plus, were she and Obama to compete there is not way her margin of victory would be upheld.  Of course she realizes that as well.  It should have never happened in the first place.  Thanks Howard Dean.

To msnbc and other new outlets, do your homework, do the math and be consistent.  Better yet, get rid of the maps and colored states.  And by all means stop using blue and red colors.  Simply list the states and percentages for each candidate, vertically.  Also breakout regular delegates from super delegates.  In addition, footnote whether the delegate count includes Michigan and Florida.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=648163

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google