ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Oh-eight (D): Show me the money

Posted: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

CLINTON: Here's a story that will make the rounds among insiders because of some of the eye-popping numbers being made at a time when the campaign is strapped for cash. Here's what will be the focus: "The high-priced senior consultants to Mrs. Clinton, of New York, have emerged as particular targets of complaints, given that they conceived and executed a political strategy that has thus far proved unsuccessful. The firm that includes Mark Penn, Mrs. Clinton’s chief strategist and pollster, and his team collected $3.8 million for fees and expenses in January; in total, including what the campaign still owes, the firm has billed more than $10 million for consulting, direct mail and other services, an amount other Democratic strategists who are not affiliated with either campaign called stunning.

Howard Wolfson, the communications director and a senior member of the advertising team, earned nearly $267,000 in January. His total, including the campaign’s debt to him, tops $730,000. The advertising firm owned by Mandy Grunwald, the longtime media strategist for both Mrs. Clinton and Bill Clinton, the former president, has collected $2.3 million in fees and expenses, and is still owed another $240,000."

The New York Post adds, “Hillary Rodham Clinton's free-spending campaign blew a whopping $95,000 at a low-end supermarket-deli chain last month in Iowa -- a telling sign of why she can no longer cut the mustard financially against Barack Obama in critical states.”

OBAMA: Ever-so-slowly, Obama's run-ins with a couple of notorious '60s radicals is starting to seep into the MSM. "In 1995, State Senator Alice Palmer introduced her chosen successor, Barack Obama, to a few of the district’s influential liberals at the home of two well known figures on  the local left: William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn." More: "Obama’s connections to Ayers and Dorhn have been noted in some fleeting news coverage in the past. But the visit by Obama to their home-part of a campaign courtship-reflects more extensive interaction than has previously reported.”

“Neither Ayers nor the Obama campaign would describe the relationship between the two men. Dr. Young described Obama and Ayers as ‘friends,’ but there’s no evidence their relationship is more than the casual friendship of two men who occupy overlapping Chicago political circles, and served together on the board of a Chicago foundation." More: "Obama’s campaign dismisses the notion that his relationship with Ayers should be seen through the lens of the latter’s violent past, or his present lack of regret for the bombings. ‘Senator Obama strongly condemns the violent actions of the Weathermen group, as he does all acts of violence,’ said Obama’s press secretary, Bill Burton. ‘But he was an eight-year old child when Ayers and the Weathermen were active, and any attempt to connect Obama with events of almost forty years ago is ridiculous.’”

The timing of the Rezko trial, set to start March 3, is not good as it comes one day before Junior Tuesday voting. 
 
Is Obama splitting hairs when he claims that technically he takes no money from federal lobbyists but takes money from folks who work at firms with federal lobbyists?

Peggy Noonan, as usual, has interesting take on Obama's speech craft: "Barack Obama's biggest draw is not his eloquence. When you watch an Obama speech, you lean forward and listen and think, That's good. He's compelling, I like the way he speaks. And afterward all the commentators call him "impossibly eloquent" and say "he gave me thrills and chills." But, in fact, when you go on the Internet and get a transcript of the speech and print it out and read it--that is, when you remove Mr. Obama from the words and take them on their own--you see the speech wasn't all that interesting, and was in fact high-class boilerplate. (This was not true of John F. Kennedy's speeches, for instance, which could be read seriously as part of the literature of modern American politics, or Martin Luther King's work, which was powerful absent his voice.)"

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hillary surprised me last night by turning away from that little devil who was sitting on her shoulder and looking a lot like Mark Penn.  She put in her usual solid debate performance and resisted a number of opportunities to go negative, even though you know she was getting an earful of bad advice about how it’s her only chance to win.

Except for that half-hearted “change you can Xerox” line (which I certainly hope she didn’t write herself), she gave a classy performance.  Some will say she was cynically playing a vulnerability card at the end, but I choose to believe it came from the heart.  It can’t have been the advice of her little devil.  

Her closing statement sounded more to me like the beginnings of a gracious acceptance of the inevitable.  Now that the NY Times has decided to help consolidate John’s base for him, the sooner we do the same the better.  If Hillary can continue in this vein it will go a long way toward healing our wounds and rehabilitating the Clinton name in the Democratic Party.
It will take OBAMA spending 4 times as much as the next guy.WHO SAYS YOU CANT BUY AN ELECTION .NEW AGE POLITICS .
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html

the republicans will be all over this.
I really don't think it's quite fair to compare Obama's speeches during a primary to those of Kennedy'r or King's. It would, however, be fair once he is president and his speeches are about policy. First of all, nobody can hold a candle to King he was talking about things more important than anyhting we face now.

Imagine Obama's speeches at the UN, or SOTU, I think they would go down in history as "political literature" as she suggests Kennedy's did.
Hey they are almost tied time for her to throw in the towel,in america close means over like the superbowl the patriots are going to win why bother playing .SUPER MAN FOR PRESIDENT HOPE THE REPUBS and INDEPENDANTs DONT FIGURE OUT HE is the invisable man
"Is Obama splitting hairs when he claims that technically he takes no money from federal lobbyists but takes money from folks who work at firms with federal lobbyists? "

No, but you are.
In other notable expenditures during the lean month of January, Mrs. Clinton paid $275,000 to Sunrise Communications, a South Carolina firm that was supposed to turn out black voters for her and collected nearly $800,000 in total.

That really was money well spent when Obama cleaned her clock out there LOL.

the campaign spent more than $11,000 on pizza and $1,200 on Dunkin’ Donuts runs.

Looks like they should have hired Richard Simmons as a exercise guru after that meal......

The advertising firm owned by Mandy Grunwald, the longtime media strategist for both Mrs. Clinton and Bill Clinton, the former president, has collected $2.3 million in fees and expenses, and is still owed another $240,000.

With a 10 state losing streak, she really needs to find someone who can gt the message out better for that kind of money....

Nearly $100,000 went for party platters and groceries before the Iowa caucuses, even though the partying mood evaporated quickly. Rooms at the Bellagio luxury hotel in Las Vegas consumed more than $25,000; the Four Seasons, another $5,000. And top consultants collected about $5 million in January, a month of crucial expenses and tough fund-raising.

For a woman who claims she wants to help the poor, this showing of her financial records proves without a shadow of a doubt that she is not a good record keeper of the books.  How can she run a country if she cannot run her own campaign??????

From the start of the campaign, some donors had concerns about the Clinton team’s ability to manage money.

From the time she had to shell out money to Paula Jones for her husband's sexual troubles, The Clinton's have been spending money like mad.  If this is the kind of spending we can look forward to in a Clinton Administration, the outlook for the country right now is even bleaker then the press makes it out to be.

“The Senate race spending in 2006 was an omen for a lot of us inside the campaign, but Hillary assured us that her presidential bid would be the best run in history,” said one major Clinton fund-raiser, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations within the campaign.

I think she stole that line from Nancy Pelosi.....
She is as original as Obama.....
At least Obama admitted he borrowed the line from his friend.....

Yet the Clinton campaign at times found itself spending money on items that were not ultimately helpful. As part of their get-out-the-vote effort in Iowa, the campaign came up with a plan to have a local supermarket deliver sandwich platters to pre-caucus parties. It spent more than $95,384 on Jan. 1 at Hy-Vee Inc., a local grocery chain in West Des Moines, Iowa, in addition to buying loads of snow shovels to clear the walks for caucusgoers. Mrs. Clinton came in third in the Jan. 3 caucus. It did not snow.

Probably took the shovels home for the day when she has to beat her husband with them....

Sandwich platters????
Beef Angus Sandwiches perhaps????
Dijon mustard and kettle cooked chips????
This sounds like something Elvis would serve.....

For instance, Mr. Obama spent nearly $480,000 on 1,331 spots in Missouri; he won the state’s primary, a closely fought contest and a national political bellwether, by one percentage point.

A man knows how to keep a checkbook.....
A woman knows how to spend the checkbook........
Maybe Hillary should have ordered 100 less Supreme Pizza's from Pizza hut and used the money there instead.

“Obviously, some campaigns are more careful and wise with their money than others,” Jim Jordan, a Democratic consultant who ran John Kerry’s presidential campaign until November 2003. “But these budgetary post-mortems tend to follow a familiar pattern; winners are by definition smart, and losers are dumb and wasteful. In truth, campaign budgeting is hard and complicated and three-dimensional and just impossible to understand without the full time-and-place context of the whole race.”

Obviously Obama got more bang for his buck....

If The Clinton's can not manage their own campaign finances, there is just no way we can trust them to run the finances of the country.  When it comes to Money, Obama seems to be the better choice on the democratic side.
I wonder why the media spends so much time thinking about Senator Obama's speeches? The must be pretty powerful after all since they get so much discussion - and results.

It seems the new way to prove what a great journalist you are is to prove that you aren't all that impressed with Senator Obama. In some circles, that's known as hating.
I would also check the Vanity Fair article about how BO cut a back room deal with Emil Jones Jr to get a clear run at the US senate seat.  Prior to that he used legal maneuvers to keep the incumbent off the ballot when he first run for State Senate.  He may not know the ways of Washington but he sure knows the ways of Chicago.  
Hillary needs to find a graceful way to exit while laying the blame for the coming carnage in november on obama and his pie in the sky followers...I detest mccain for going from straight talk to stray talk as he took on the Bush III mantle but he will kill obama this fall
Hill is a disaster. She can not even run her campaign and she wants everyone to believe she can run this country.
Its like having a bankrupt accountant do you finances.
More media prostitution by First Read on behalf of Barrack Obama. Your asses are owned by Hillary haters Mathews and Russert, and you are being "turned out" by "Pimp Daddy B.O."
How does it feel to be whores?
Here's a story for you, and it's brewing out here faster than you could ever imagine. We who support Hillary will continue to do so, through to the end of the convention. Following which, depending on the outcome, we will keep our options open.
Do you get it?
No I don't think so.
So, I'll spell it out for you.....Hillary's supporters are NOT going to vote for Obama in the general election.
She'll do what she has to, in order to maintain appearances and not be blamed for Obama getting hbis ass whooped in the 'general' by McCain.
She'll make a plea for unity, and she'll say & do the right thing for The Democratic Party. (Something Obama and his supporters don't care about, by the way. Just ask the people of Michiugan and Florida)
But Hillary Democrats, who LOVE their country, and who don't want it to fall into the hands of a self serving sell-out like "Pimp Daddy B.O." will never, ever under any circumsances vote for this shucking and jiving used car salesman.
Get ready First Read....for the shock of your life when Democrats like myself bolt the party and vote for McCain.
It's Hillary, or it's NOBODY.
Period.

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2008!
Patriotism OVER Personalities
McCain needs to be quiet.
Keating 5?, Affairs? Bushs war? Flip flopping???
If the debate last night had one lesson for Hillary it's that going negative against Obama is the worst thing to do. Her advantage is her experiences her emotions are her attributes. But alas it maybe too little, too late.

Obama controlled the audience, his applause lines were replied with almost unanimous applause. His humurous annecdotes made him pause to wait for the laughter to subside. In contrast Hillary's lines were luke warm. Her jokes gained her boos. For her best moment to be at the end of the debate is telling on a myriad of levels.

To use a boxing analogy, Obama has versatile style while Clinton is looking for a one punch knockout that never materializes. Hiilary in boxing a jab is the best weapon and for you your emotional connection for why you run is that jab.

Obama, don't let the flash fool you. It's the punch you don't see coming that lays you flat. Protect yourself at all times! Let's get it on!
Obama is a shucking and jiving used car salesman.
If Hillary doesn't get the nomination, I implore all Patriotic Democrats to vote against the sale of our country to terrorists thugs, and communists by "Pimp Daddy B.O."
If Hillary isn't nominated, vote for McCain.
He may be a Republican.
But, he won't negotiate with terrorists, and he won't kiss any communist ass, like "Pimp Daddy B.O." will.
I am disgusted with the Democratic Party for allowing itself to be pimped and prostituted by independents and republicans.
If we don't get Hillary after the convention, then it's...

Democrats for McCain, 2008!
J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY / 'But Hillary Democrats, who LOVE their country, and who don't want it to fall into the hands of a self serving sell-out like "Pimp Daddy B.O." will never, ever under any circumsances vote for this shucking and jiving used car salesman.
Get ready First Read....for the shock of your life when Democrats like myself bolt the party and vote for McCain.
It's Hillary, or it's NOBODY.
Period.'

j I have to wonder why first read continues to post you’re ranting, you must know somebody there or something, for some reason you apparently think your opinion should matter, guess what? it don't, vote for mccain, nobody cares
J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 9:39 AM)

Whores, pimp daddy, prostitution, a**es, -are u serious?

Now, is it really the Obama supporters who are hateful and vile?

My, my, are we angry this morning?

U may not vote for Obama should he get the nom., but according to WI exit polls- many Clinton supporters will- and last I checked- Obama still lead McCain in national exit polls (though still pretty early for that yet).

But- such language- regardless of who the nominee is.  I am a person who would in no way vote for Clinton, however, I would also in no way disrespect her or my fellow Americans in that manner  That's just in bad taste- and leads no one to think very highly of you or your opinion.
*Hugs J. Merle*

It's going to be okay. If we can survive 8 years of "W", we can survive whoever comes next. I admire your devotion to Senator Clinton, even though I question the methods you both have used over the campaign.

That said though, I wish you well.
HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2008!
Patriotism OVER Personalities

J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 9:39 AM)


I think you mean....

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2008!
After all, It's money that matters!
Watching Barack Obama's style of leadership, makes me think of the paradigm shift taking place in board rooms across America. Great leaders of today know that to transform an organization one has to involve the workers, allow their voice… empower them to take responsibility. Sustainably successful companies of the 21st century strike a balance of mutual respect between management and labor... and that success, while inspired from the leader, grows from the bottom up. You can't FORCE someone to execute your will over a long period of time, but great lengths can be gained by the inner drive of the SELF WILL.

That, is the kind of influence I see Barack Obama having on the American people.

AND... I would say he exerted some of that influence on Hillary last night during the debate. It was as if his leadership on stage (and he did look presidential while she looked strong, but subject to that), inspired her to make that conciliatory remark at the end.

How many of us have experienced being in the presence of someone with real power? The kind of power and greatness that stems from goodness? If you've ever had the experience you know it can influence your own thoughts and actions.

To think--if it's true--that Barack Obama is the kind of leader that could influence others this way... "bringing out the better angels" of our nature, then this is the man I want negotiating face to face with America's adversaries.
This may be a naieve question, but where did Sen. Clinton get $5 million to loan to her campaign?  
J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 9:47 AM)

For someone who used to go after Obama for using Republican talking points, you sure do sound like....a Republican.

It is interesting that you complain about all the horrible things Obama will do. Especially since his policies are essentially the same as Clinton's. It leaves 2 possibilities: 1) You are a closet Republican who doesn't really know it yet, or 2) You are so petty that you think this is some sort of game in which if your rival wins, you are willing to help an even bigger rival defeat the other in order to relieve your childish anger.

At best, you are a "Lieberman Democrat". But everyday that you come on here spitting your vitriolic diatribes for no other reason than that you can't accept the fact that Obama has run a better campaign than Clinton, you inch ever closer to skipping straight to being a "Karl Rove Republican".

There is a place for everyone in the new American majority. Even for you, J. Merle. I hope you don't let your pettiness stand in the way of it.
I am a Clinton supporter and will not vote for Obama should he be the nominee.  He is all hot air.  He is seductive, manipulative, and persuasive.  These are not characteristics of a good president - for example the one we have now.

I will vote for McCain if Obama is the Democratic nominee.

And yes, Obama is taking money from lobbyists and it is not hair splitting to say he is even if the money appears to be from employees.

Wake up America before we have another 4 to 8 years like we have just about finished.

Clinton is the wise vote, Obama is the emotional vote.
This may be a naieve question, but where did Sen. Clinton get $5 million to loan to her campaign?  

Bruce, St. Helens, OR (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 10:03 AM)

Found some more Chinese dishwashers?????
Bill's deals in Russia???????
Bill's speeches in South America......
I think Adam makes a good point. People point to Kennedy's speeches, but most of the notable examples are from after he was elected, when he was confronting issues not as a candidate but as the president.

There are a few exceptions. His speech about religion and politics, in response to concerns about his being Catholic, was very good. And of course there's a few notable others.

King likewise was speaking as an unofficial office holder as head of a larger effort - a real world effort, aiming for bigger things than electing a candidate.

Obama is a great speaker, and if served by good speechwriters (is Noonan willing to cross the aisle?), there's a pretty good chance we'll see some memorable text from his speeches as president.
J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 9:47 AM)


Sounds like somebody needs to take a nap.
I am a Clinton supporter and will not vote for Obama should he be the nominee.  He is all hot air.  He is seductive, manipulative, and persuasive.  These are not characteristics of a good president - for example the one we have now.

KYDemocrat (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 10:11 AM)

KYDemocrat,

While I completely disagree with your assessment, I am going to give you some friendly advice. When you are criticizing someone, try not to use adjectives like "seductive" or "persuasive". First, "seductive" sounds creepy in this context. Second, "persuasiveness" is a more of a good quality than a bad one.

Manipulative is a nice negative charge though. Good work.
SO let me get this straight - Hillary can't run her home life or her campaign.  What a farce she is.  I have been a stout Republican my whole life and I am voting for Obama when they come to PA.  
I will never vote for John McCain.  He is to old.  Ronald Reagan was in his 70's when he was elected and he was a mess at the end of his presidency.  John McCain is also in his 70's right now.  Do you honestly think he is not set in his ways? Do you honestly think he is open to new ideas? How about some change?
Barack Obama is the change I seek and compared to the two ther candidates that I can choose he is the best one!
Pennsylvania Republicans 4 Obama!!
But Hillary Democrats, who LOVE their country, and who don't want it to fall into the hands of a self serving sell-out like "Pimp Daddy B.O." will never, ever under any circumsances vote for this shucking and jiving used car salesman.
Get ready First Read....for the shock of your life when Democrats like myself bolt the party and vote for McCain.
It's Hillary, or it's NOBODY.
Period.

J Merle Stanley,

Those are very strong words for a supporter of a candidate who shares 75 to 80% of the same positions as the person you are calling a pimpdaddy.  In fact if you watched the debate last night you should have noticed that even when they disagree it is usually over small differences on the same approach. simply put if you choose a candidate who shares little to none of the same views as your canidate you are not only doing youself a disservice but your country as well.  How PATRIOTIC IS THAT!
To all Clinton supporters:

It is unbelievable you spend so much time finding any insignificant “dirt” about Obama’s past and try to negate his skills and god -given talents, but you are so indifferent to a major unethical record of John “I- am- -a- war- hero”  McCain, which is a million times more important than anything you have brought against Obama. Just get over it, Obam is smarter, and has better political and organizational skills than Clintons.

Peg, PA
There are more people who would never ever vote for a Clinton again than the select few who can't handle losing and will not vote for Obama.
Nothing can unify the Republican party like a Clinton can and now you, J Merle Stanley, can join them.
Good luck with a 70+ year old man who can't stop war mongerring. Way to get even for Obama winning!
You should grow up and put your party and country first instaed of getting even!
TO ALL THE VOTERS IN DEMOCRATIC PARTY WHO SAY THEY WILL VOTE FOR McCAIN I HAVE TO ASK YOU WHY? DO YOU WANT THE WAR TO GO ON AND ON IN IRAQ.DO YOU NOT THINK WATER BOARDING IS TOUTURE.DO YOU WANT TO GIVE IMMUNITY TO THE TELECOMS IN THE FISA BILL. McCAIN VOTED AGAINST CALLING WATER BOARDING TORTURE AND FOR GIVING THE PHONE COMPANIES IMMUNITY LAST WEEK!DO YOU NOT LIKE THE BILL OF RIGHTS. WHAT KIND OF JUDGES DO YOU WANT SITTING ON SUPREME COURT?DO YOU THINK THE BUSH TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH ARE A GOOD THING?ARE YOU NOT CONCERNED IN THE LEAST BIT ABOUT THE SCHOOLS AND THE ECOMONY?IF YOU ANWSER NO TO ALL THESE THINGS THAN BY ALL MEANS GO VOTE FOR A REPUBLICAN!
"...j I have to wonder why first read continues to post you’re ranting, you must know somebody there or something, for some reason you apparently think your opinion should matter, guess what? it don't, vote for mccain, nobody cares ..."
MK,MO (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 9:51 AM)

Guess what MK?
You and you're litte twerp ObaMANIAC friends are going to find out just how much my voice, and the voices of all Hillary's supporters matter come November 4th.
Obama will not win the general election, because real Democrats will not voie for him.
REAL Democrats don't want their country sold out by "Pimp Daddy B.O."
"...You should grow up and put your party and country first instaed of getting even! ..."
Lenore Weber (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 10:46 AM)

Lenore,
People like you are the ones who need to grow up and support your country.
You claim nobody would vote for Clinton, yet she carried NY and California and beat Obama in Mass. where he had the support of BOTH Kerry and The Drunken Murderer.
You would put a junior senator with absolutely NO foriegn diplomatic, or military-oversight experience whatsoever in the driver's seat of the world's largest nuclear power.
So, don't preach to me about supporting my country. You apparently know NOTHING about that particular subject.
Hillary is right, it's time to get real.
You can kiss my PATRIOTIC ass if you think I would put a shucking and jiving used car salesman like "Pimp Daddy B.O." in the White House.
PATRIOTIC Democrats who LOVE their country and don't want to see it sold out to terrorist thugs, and communists won't vote for Obama, you can bet your lungs on that.
Guess what MK?
You and you're litte twerp ObaMANIAC friends are going to find out just how much my voice, and the voices of all Hillary's supporters matter come November 4th.
Obama will not win the general election, because real Democrats will not voie for him.
REAL Democrats don't want their country sold out by "Pimp Daddy B.O."

J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 10:54 AM)

Yeah. REAL Democrats don't vote for Democrats. They vote for Republicans!! Right J. Merle?

Haha.

Your logic is amusing.
Seriously, the front runner of the Democratic nomination is a pimp? Really, I don't know you but I know bigotry when I hear/read it.

Clinton and McCain are exempt from your brand of venom but Obama isn't. It's not based on policy that you make these statements it's prejudice. How sad and shallow is your rhetoric. Grow up. Hate the plan and not the man.
I love the fact that obama and clinton supports hate each other so much.  Means a clear path to the white house for republicans!

Elephant 08!!
with absolutely NO foriegn diplomatic, or military-oversight experience whatsoever in the driver's seat of the world's largest nuclear power.
J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 11:02 AM)

So I guess you didn't vote for Bill Clinton then either?  Yeah, thought so.
If Clinton can not run an effective, organized, cost-efficient campaign how on earth can she manage Universal Health Care, let alone THE COUNTRY? She's for change? She's the candidate of solutions? Yuh, sure! Sadly she sounds, reacts and behaves remarkably Bush-like; insistant that it's her way or no way, and refuses to see any or all of her short comings-SCARY!!!
Furthermore, her mean-mouthed, bullish supporters do nothing to help her and only make the poor woman appear more desperate and sad.
Submitted by a REAL Independent...for Obama!
FR: [[Howard Wolfson, the communications director and a senior member of the advertising team, earned nearly $267,000 in January. His total, including the campaign’s debt to him, tops $730,000.]]


Well, yeah, that's a little pricey, but the guy is one of those night shift workers Hillary keeps talking about.
FR: [[Howard Wolfson, the communications director and a senior member of the advertising team, earned nearly $267,000 in January. His total, including the campaign’s debt to him, tops $730,000.]]


Well, yeah, that's a little pricey, but the guy is one of those night shift workers Hillary keeps talking about.
To Citizen J and the other irrational hate filled individuals out there.  I believe the only reason Hill Clinton stayed with Bill Clinton was because of her political aspirations.  I also believe that Hill and Bill are both running for the Whitehouse to repair their legacy!  Can you honestly tell me that there would be transparency in another Clinton Whitehouse?  I don't think so.  Sen. Clinton is so polarizing I can see the other side standing together to block anything she tried to do.  She would run up against a brick wall at every turn.  

But, step back a bit.  If Hill became the nom. the Republicans would mobilize and I believe the Dems would lose the election.  Sure electing a woman to the highest office would be wonderful, but Sen. Clinton is the wrong woman.  Now don't get me wrong, I have nothing against her, I'm mostly against the establishment Hill and Bill are associated with.  I'm mostly against the tactics they have used and their attitude that they will do anything to win.

Not to mention, their spending habits, how can they possibly know how to help lower income Americans when they have absolutely no fiscal responsibility themselves. I feel that the middle class would once again find themselves on the back burner for another 4-8 years as there would be a whole bunch of paybacks first.

Obama on the other had has god given talents which I believe will bring this Country together.  He surrounded himself with expert advisors prior to his bid to win the nom.  The manner in which he has managed his campaign gives me great confidence that he has the understanding and knowledge to bring our Country back into economic balance.  However, I believe what sets Obama apart from the other two candidates is his ability to bring folks together.  I agree with an earlier comment, can you just imagine how he’ll bring people together around the world?

I knew immediately after hearing his speech at the 2004 convention that this man was destined for great things.

My vote goes to Obama, a vote for a new day!
To Citizen J and the other irrational hate filled individuals out there.  I believe the only reason Hill Clinton stayed with Bill Clinton was because of her political aspirations.  I also believe that Hill and Bill are both running for the Whitehouse to repair their legacy!  Can you honestly tell me that there would be transparency in another Clinton Whitehouse?  I don't think so.  Sen. Clinton is so polarizing I can see the other side standing together to block anything she tried to do.  She would run up against a brick wall at every turn.  

But, step back a bit.  If Hill became the nom. the Republicans would mobilize and I believe the Dems would lose the election.  Sure electing a woman to the highest office would be wonderful, but Sen. Clinton is the wrong woman.  Now don't get me wrong, I have nothing against her, I'm mostly against the establishment Hill and Bill are associated with.  I'm mostly against the tactics they have used and their attitude that they will do anything to win.

Not to mention, their spending habits, how can they possibly know how to help lower income Americans when they have absolutely no fiscal responsibility themselves. I feel that the middle class would once again find themselves on the back burner for another 4-8 years as there would be a whole bunch of paybacks first.

Obama on the other had has god given talents which I believe will bring this Country together.  He surrounded himself with expert advisors prior to his bid to win the nom.  The manner in which he has managed his campaign gives me great confidence that he has the understanding and knowledge to bring our Country back into economic balance.  However, I believe what sets Obama apart from the other two candidates is his ability to bring folks together.  I agree with an earlier comment, can you just imagine how he’ll bring people together around the world?

I knew immediately after hearing his speech at the 2004 convention that this man was destined for great things.

My vote goes to Obama, a vote for a new day!
Last night once again demonstrated the many faces of Hillary Clinton.

With Barack, he is the same person day in and day out.  With Hillary Clinton, which is it?

It reminds me of the old game show "To Tell the Truth"...will the real Hillary Clinton please stand up.....or better yet, quit and go back to New York.
Peggy Noonan was the principal speechwriter for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. She also campaigned for George W. Bush.  She is responsible for the phrases "kinder gentler nation", "thousand points of light" and "read my lips, no new taxes". Keep that in mind when considering her criticisms of Obama.
To Citizen J and the other irrational hate filled individuals out there.  I believe the only reason Hill Clinton stayed with Bill Clinton was because of her political aspirations.  I also believe that Hill and Bill are both running for the Whitehouse to repair their legacy!  Can you honestly tell me that there would be transparency in another Clinton Whitehouse?  I don't think so.  Sen. Clinton is so polarizing I can see the other side standing together to block anything she tried to do.  She would run up against a brick wall at every turn.  

Donna, Charlottesville, VA (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 11:28 AM)

Donna,

Please direct me to a post in which I said anything that indicates my support for Hillary Clinton. Also, please direct me to a post in which I was irrational and hate-filled. I think you have me confused with someone else. Maybe J. Merle Stanley.

Please get your facts straight before you include my name in your post.
-63 y.o.man, well educated- I support Hillary. She's tough, she's a fighter, she's not a knee-jerk liberal like I used to be. Obmana never voted on the war, he gave an opinion. He never had the mis-information that Hillary had and used to honestly come to a decision as must an elected official. Hillary has worked for years at issues to change the lives of the poor and the direction of the country. She has fought and lost and fought again. And, she has done it as a woman in times (that continue) when both men and women resented an intellegent and hard working woman who spoke out. I like her because of all this and especially because she is a fighter. She won't give up. It may seem impossible but I still hope she gets the nomination. She is the better prepared. Obama is my second choice. After that, there are, for me, no other choices. I can't conceive of voting for a Republican. McCain and his "Party" are void of ideas and plans that have any possibility of moving the USA ahead in a time when it is quickly slipping behind. GO DEMOCRATS
J. Merle,

I'm having trouble understanding your logic here. I am a registered Democrat, yes, a real one. And I'm an Obama supporter. However, I made a conscious decision when I decided to finally go with Obama that if, for some reason, he didn't make it to the general election that I would support Hillary. That's because of their policies, not because of their party.

I cannot allow myself to vote for someone (McCain) that will continue to support the same failed policies that we've had to endure for the past seven years. And I hope that you, as a fellow Democrat, can see that as well.

Refusing to vote for someone simply because they are running against, and will possibly beat your candidate is both childish and irresponsible. And before you even make outlandish comments like voting for McCain simply because Hillary isn't the Dem candidate without taking into account his policies and future ramifications for this country and its people are inexcusable.

I take your comments about people who voted and support Obama as being stupid or somehow ill informed as an insult. And I'm sure that the other Obama supports will back me up on this.

If you don't like the fact that Hillary may not be the Democrat's nominee come November, go ahead and leave for the well worn pastures of the McCain campaign, but don't let the door hit you on the way out. And don't complain when McCain gets us into another 100 year war, the price of gas is $5 a gallon, your job is outsourced to India, and Donald Trump gets another tax cut after McCain's elected.
J Merle - miss your meds today?
J. baby......you know whatg happens when you ASSume?

You sure speak for alot of people you don't know


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=690994

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google