ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Oh-eight (D): Show me the money

Posted: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

CLINTON: Here's a story that will make the rounds among insiders because of some of the eye-popping numbers being made at a time when the campaign is strapped for cash. Here's what will be the focus: "The high-priced senior consultants to Mrs. Clinton, of New York, have emerged as particular targets of complaints, given that they conceived and executed a political strategy that has thus far proved unsuccessful. The firm that includes Mark Penn, Mrs. Clinton’s chief strategist and pollster, and his team collected $3.8 million for fees and expenses in January; in total, including what the campaign still owes, the firm has billed more than $10 million for consulting, direct mail and other services, an amount other Democratic strategists who are not affiliated with either campaign called stunning.

Howard Wolfson, the communications director and a senior member of the advertising team, earned nearly $267,000 in January. His total, including the campaign’s debt to him, tops $730,000. The advertising firm owned by Mandy Grunwald, the longtime media strategist for both Mrs. Clinton and Bill Clinton, the former president, has collected $2.3 million in fees and expenses, and is still owed another $240,000."

The New York Post adds, “Hillary Rodham Clinton's free-spending campaign blew a whopping $95,000 at a low-end supermarket-deli chain last month in Iowa -- a telling sign of why she can no longer cut the mustard financially against Barack Obama in critical states.”

OBAMA: Ever-so-slowly, Obama's run-ins with a couple of notorious '60s radicals is starting to seep into the MSM. "In 1995, State Senator Alice Palmer introduced her chosen successor, Barack Obama, to a few of the district’s influential liberals at the home of two well known figures on  the local left: William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn." More: "Obama’s connections to Ayers and Dorhn have been noted in some fleeting news coverage in the past. But the visit by Obama to their home-part of a campaign courtship-reflects more extensive interaction than has previously reported.”

“Neither Ayers nor the Obama campaign would describe the relationship between the two men. Dr. Young described Obama and Ayers as ‘friends,’ but there’s no evidence their relationship is more than the casual friendship of two men who occupy overlapping Chicago political circles, and served together on the board of a Chicago foundation." More: "Obama’s campaign dismisses the notion that his relationship with Ayers should be seen through the lens of the latter’s violent past, or his present lack of regret for the bombings. ‘Senator Obama strongly condemns the violent actions of the Weathermen group, as he does all acts of violence,’ said Obama’s press secretary, Bill Burton. ‘But he was an eight-year old child when Ayers and the Weathermen were active, and any attempt to connect Obama with events of almost forty years ago is ridiculous.’”

The timing of the Rezko trial, set to start March 3, is not good as it comes one day before Junior Tuesday voting. 
 
Is Obama splitting hairs when he claims that technically he takes no money from federal lobbyists but takes money from folks who work at firms with federal lobbyists?

Peggy Noonan, as usual, has interesting take on Obama's speech craft: "Barack Obama's biggest draw is not his eloquence. When you watch an Obama speech, you lean forward and listen and think, That's good. He's compelling, I like the way he speaks. And afterward all the commentators call him "impossibly eloquent" and say "he gave me thrills and chills." But, in fact, when you go on the Internet and get a transcript of the speech and print it out and read it--that is, when you remove Mr. Obama from the words and take them on their own--you see the speech wasn't all that interesting, and was in fact high-class boilerplate. (This was not true of John F. Kennedy's speeches, for instance, which could be read seriously as part of the literature of modern American politics, or Martin Luther King's work, which was powerful absent his voice.)"

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

To J Merle:  I am one of those "horrible" Independents that you so love to hate.  Obama was not my first or second choice for the Democratic nomination, and either is Hillary, although I think they are both smart and capable.  Your vitriol is...surprising.  By all means, vote for Mr. McCain-another 100 years of Iraq at 12 Billion a month is perfect for someone with your sustained venom.
I'll just vote for the Democratic candidate, whomever that is, even if it is Hillary, because I believe that Democrats are the only party who has a snowballs chance of even beginning to turn around what the Republicans have wrought in the last 7 years.  Your candidate will support Senator Obama if she has to and is showing much more grace than you, sir about it.
"with absolutely NO foriegn diplomatic, or military-oversight experience whatsoever in the driver's seat of the world's largest nuclear power."
J. Merle Stanley, Westchester, NY


Mr. J.(Ms. J?)
Check out Lugar-Obama legislation regarding non-proliferation.

He traveled to Russia with Republican Dick Lugar to begin a new generation of non-proliferation efforts designed to find and secure deadly weapons around the world.

This is one example of his working accross party lines in co-sponsoring a bill. He got it through a republican congress and signed by a republican president.

This is an important example of foreign policy, national security, and bi-partisan politics.

J. I really think that you need to look at Mr. Obama's accomplishments. I am sure you can Google. You may also want to look at your use of the term "Pimp Daddy". This is certainly no way to unite the democrats. It sounds a bit racist, and it really doesn't make you sound credible.

The two candidates share many policy ideas in common, though they differ in some of their methods.

Are you really so bitter that you can't see that the Democrats do have similar goals? That the current administration and any continuation therof is bad for the country?

If you really want to vote Rebublican, they are welcome to you.

Mr. Independant, CA
I have yet to have a blog posted by whoever is reading them.  My thoughts are the same as most of my friends. We are white, women, highly educated and sick and tired of men telling us what is good for us. My comments have been reasoned and clear.  I like Hillay and always have.  What you see is what you get. However, as an ex oratory and depating champ (in high school no less) I feel that Mr. Barak talks the good talk but can he walk the walk.  I am not willing to take a chance.  Your high paid pundits (are there any women out there in NBC land?) are willing to risk America's future in order to keep a woman out of the  White House.  Fawning over Obama is really a nice way of putting it.  I will spare you what I really think! And I'm sure this won't get posted either.  
re:  Show Me the Money.  Of all data available on Senator Clinton those cited in this article clarify every reason she is not fit to govern.  Fiscally she is a major liability and example of all that excessively wrong in Washington! The expenses itemized are way out of line.  Justification of these excesses are horrific given the plight of the average American Homeowner.

How can anyone justify mismanagement of other peoples monies?  This is prime illustration of what to expect when she is elected.  Blind disregard for other peoples money, OUR money.  Our priorities are roof over our families heads, food, utilities, transportation/gas/oil, child/elder care, medical expenses / premiums, bankrupcy, etc.  We are all settling for what we can afford, and many of us are struggling just to make the next house payment, praying utlities will last, and blow our budgets on necessities.  We do not have the luxury of living the High Roller Lifestyle while mouthing concern for the plight of America.  To cite that her expenses were to make her "Look Presidential"  is mocking the state of American economic distress.

Way to go Senator Hillary R. Clinton - there sure won't be any "government waste" with you at the helm.  You definately won't be wasting our tax dollars / donations on lavish frivolities or personal comfort embellishments.

Chelsea must be pulling down some decent coin from Team Mom too. There's nothing like getting rich off the backs of your contributors.
I have a new name for Obama - the Flim-flam man.
Good Lord, y'all!! Stop the madness.  I am a Hillary supporter, but I am more concerned with the concerted effort of the GOP to game the open primary system by intentionally voting for Obama.  Karl Rove (it bothers me to even type the name) has openly discussed it and I have followed links to right wing blogs that discuss the same thing.  The reason the GOP is stacking the deck is to NOT have to face the most qualified canidate, Sen. Clinton, in November.  They want to face the eloquent inexperience of Obama, knowing McCain will eat him up and spit him out.  I am truly afraid that for all of the wonderful turn outs and fresh interest in the process, it will all be for naught and we will have 4 more years of opaque, warring, narrow minded policies.
Good Lord, y'all!! Stop the madness.  I am a Hillary supporter, but I am more concerned with the concerted effort of the GOP to game the open primary system by intentionally voting for Obama.  Karl Rove (it bothers me to even type the name) has openly discussed it and I have followed links to right wing blogs that discuss the same thing.  The reason the GOP is stacking the deck is to NOT have to face the most qualified canidate, Sen. Clinton, in November.  They want to face the eloquent inexperience of Obama, knowing McCain will eat him up and spit him out.  I am truly afraid that for all of the wonderful turn outs and fresh interest in the process, it will all be for naught and we will have 4 more years of opaque, warring, narrow minded policies.
Good Lord, y'all!! Stop the madness.  I am a Hillary supporter, but I am more concerned with the concerted effort of the GOP to game the open primary system by intentionally voting for Obama.  Karl Rove (it bothers me to even type the name) has openly discussed it and I have followed links to right wing blogs that discuss the same thing.  The reason the GOP is stacking the deck is to NOT have to face the most qualified canidate, Sen. Clinton, in November.  They want to face the eloquent inexperience of Obama, knowing McCain will eat him up and spit him out.  I am truly afraid that for all of the wonderful turn outs and fresh interest in the process, it will all be for naught and we will have 4 more years of opaque, warring, narrow minded policies.
I am sick and tired of the media deciding who will be the next president.  I do not support Hillary nor do I support Obama. I feel that neither is fit to lead this country.  However, that being said, the talking heads should take a good hard and HONEST look at themselves and what they are feeding the general public. And shame on the New York Times for their Enquirer like reporting.  
Is Obama splitting hairs?  No, he's lying.  He has taken quite a bit more than $85,000 in lobbyist and pac money, but he's done an excellent job deceiving the American people.  He violates the central premise of his campaign--that he is an agent of change that is not influenced by lobbyists and pacs--every single day of the campaign.  This was well documented by the LA Times last year.

He took a combined $170,000 from Goldman Sachs and Citigroup while they had several issues pending in Washington.  In 2006 they spent millions of dollars on their lobbying operations in Washington.

To read more about how Obama deceives you about where his money comes from read this:

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/22/681/

Senator Obama owes his supporters an apology for lying to them about his campaign finances.  McCain will clobber him on this issue alone.

Say what you want about Senator Clinton taking more money from lobbyists; at least she hasn't lied about it.  

Change Senator Obama?  You're just as dirty, if not more so, as everybody else, and it's about time America wised up about it.
Obama is a shucking and jiving used car salesman.
If Hillary doesn't get the nomination, I implore all Patriotic Democrats to vote against the sale of our country to terrorists thugs, and communists by "Pimp Daddy B.O."
If Hillary isn't nominated, vote for McCain.
He may be a Republican.
But, he won't negotiate with terrorists, and he won't kiss any communist ass, like "Pimp Daddy B.O." will.
I am disgusted with the Democratic Party for allowing itself to be pimped and prostituted by independents and republicans.
If we don't get Hillary after the convention, then it's...

Democrats for McCain, 2008!
J. Merle Stanley Westchester, NY (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 9:47 AM)

-------------------------------------------------
I am with you J. Merle  I rather have an experienced McCain than a empty suit BO.
We could get a crap ticket like OBAMA/PATRICK and sink into the muck!  I am as angry as you and I have changed to an independent as the Dems are totally screwed up.
I am glad you are being posted as I am not.  Shoot ya have to be for BO to get posted here. STINKS!
While i was out on errands, I swung by the new Hillary Clinton headquarters here in Corpus Christi.....

Used to be an employment office, a dance studio, and a video place that sold X rated videos out the back.....

Perfect choice Clinton's....

There used to be a pizza place that sold some great pizza's about 15 years ago, but they have closed down.

But do not fret Clinton's.......

Pizza Hut is right around the corner in the same shopping center...

Domino's is right across Staples St.

And there is a Boat and Net fish place on the corner, as well as a Hub's hamburger joint.

So, all you Clinton supporters may have to kick in extra money to help feed these folks......

Too bad Bill is coming at 2130 tonight....
Hamilin Pharmacy has some of the best hamburgers in Corpus Christi......right on the other corner of the shopping center.
Good Lord, y'all!! Stop the madness.  I am a Hillary supporter, but I am more concerned with the concerted effort of the GOP to game the open primary system by intentionally voting for Obama.  Karl Rove (it bothers me to even type the name) has openly discussed it and I have followed links to right wing blogs that discuss the same thing.  The reason the GOP is stacking the deck is to NOT have to face the most qualified canidate, Sen. Clinton, in November.  They want to face the eloquent inexperience of Obama, knowing McCain will eat him up and spit him out.  I am truly afraid that for all of the wonderful turn outs and fresh interest in the process, it will all be for naught and we will have 4 more years of opaque, warring, narrow minded policies.
jcw., Atlanta, GA (Sent Friday, February 22, 2008 1:05 PM
-----------------------------------------
We keep saying that jcw but no one is paying any attention. IT's words and words are all they have and they take their minds away! IT is for naught! (nice word)
Peggy Noonan makes a gratuitous comment on the "boilerplate prose" of Barack Obama. She is inviting an unfavorable comparison to herself.  All we need do to assess Barack Obama's literary and intellectual gifts is to read his autobiography. Ms. Noonan might want to compare it to her own (anyone remember that she wrote one?)
Politico story = GUILT BY ASSOCIATION
I love the fact that obama and clinton supports hate each other so much.  Means a clear path to the white house for republicans!

Elephant 08!!

John, MI

John, I wouldn't assume too much from any of these post. Obama was my second choice in the Iowa caucuses, and Hillary was above only Kucinich and Gravel. after my choice did not continue after Iowa I went with Obama, my second choice. However I like most Democrats will vote for the Democratic nominee in November. I hope it is Obama, not because Hillary wouldn't make a fine President, she would, but because I know she can't win Iowa, and Obama can, and I fear that too many other swing states would go for McCain if the choice is Clinton versus McCain. The overwhelming number of Democrats will vote for the Democrat nominee. Obama may have a slight led as nominee in the Democratic vote, both either one will do fine. However if Obama is the nominee he will crush McCain with the Independent voters, and the candidate who wins the most independents will be the next President.
The New York Times piece regarding Clinton's donors being worried is interesting. Joe Trippi is right about the way Clinton spent her money. In Iowa it wasn't merely the volume of direct mail, most of which (from all candidates) went directly into the recycling bin. But at events they wasted so much money on needless set up costs. At the Hall of Fame dinner 2/3 of the tables were bought by the Clinton campaign, and 90% of those who sat at the Clinton tables were young out of state staff members, many flown in for the event. Obama did not attend the event. Those of us that did weren't impressed by Hillary's support among the youth, say what you will about Iowa Democratic party activist (the type who attends the dinner) we know the difference between grass roots supporters and "paid staff".

I laughed at learning about the cost of the "sandwich platters", this was a dumb move, far worse than buying shovels in case it snows (although some how I doubt her paid staff would have stooped to actually clearing many walk ways, if we had a measurable snow fall). When the state Democratic party first learned of Clinton's plan (without any prior discussions with leaders of the Iowa Democratic party)they initially banned all food and beverages at the caucuses. After some discussion, and presumably concerns regarding whether this would be a problem for diabetics, the Democratic party left the decision up to each individual county. The Linn county Democratic central committee (Iowa's second largest county) went forward with the ban, prohibiting any candidate from bringing in food and drink to the caucus sites. Having attended caucuses since 1980, at numerous precincts I've never seen or heard of a candidate providing food. Whether this helped Clinton get a few undecided, or those whose first choice was non-viable is unknown, but it certainly didn't help her at my precinct. Not only because her campaign ignored the directive and had a long table full of food "to share with all" ,  but it was viewed as an attempt to buy support, and  given the lack of space at most caucus sites due to turn out(close to 100 over the buildings fire code capacity at my precinct), having a the table cause people to be even more cramped was not a good idea. Clinton came in third with 5 more supporters than Biden, and 3 less supporters than Edwards. However, Obama who spent a lot of money in Iowa, but not on stupid things (like renting a donkey with a  Hillary sign for the Hawkeye Labor Councils Labor day picnic)had more than three times the number of supporters at my caucus.  

Clinton's biggest waste of money still appears to be for Mark Penn, the guy has no clue. Hillary had no chance of winning Iowa, and the percent of caucus goers supporting her state wide was considerably less than the 29% of delegates she received (both Clinton and Edwards raked in "delegates" in rural counties, which are awarded a disproportionate number of delegates, and where as few as 5 supporters could get you a delegate, but they were crushed in all of the larger counties where increased turn out was highest, and each delegate represents 50 or more supporters). The best Clinton could ever hope for is support in the upper twenty percent.

For her campaign to not understand that she had no chance of winning Iowa was amazing.      


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=690994

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google