ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



March 2008 - Posts

Hillary to appear on Leno Thursday

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:26 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
The Tonight Show with Jay Leno has just announced that Clinton will appear on the show Thursday. Per the press release, it will be the third time she has been on Leno.

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

100 years?

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:14 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
Does McCain really want troops in iraq for one hundred years? According to Obama the answer is yes.

In a back and forth at today's press conference, Obama insisted he was not taking out of context McCain's comments about keeping troops in Iraq for 100 years. Asked if his attack was disingenous, Obama had the following to say:

"I don’t think it’s unfair at all," Obama said. "John McCain, I mean, we can run the YouTube spot, has said that we will stay there as long as it takes. And if it takes another 100 years, he’s up for that commitment and that implies that there is some criteria by which we would understand how long it takes.

"John McCain has not been clear about what exactly would lead him to decide it's time to pull out. And so, you know, the problem that we’ve had both with John McCain and George Bush is that there’s no clear definition of success. There never was, and that’s why this has been such a profound strategic error. And you know, I think it is entirely fair to suggest that unless he’s got some criteria where by, at some point, we would be able to pull out our troops. For him to argue that, which he has repeatedly, that any suggestion that we withdraw troops is surrender. That implies that we will be there as long as he thinks it’s necessary for us to be there."

Obama was told that McCain had said the presence would be similar to what the United States had done with Germany and Japan in World War II. Obama seemed to agree with that notion but pointed to the costs of the war as a reason to avoid that type of engagement.

Here's McCain's response on this to Tim Russert on Meet the Press.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (74 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton blasts Treasury plan, hits McCain

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 4:59 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
HARRISBURG, PA -- The Treasury Department's plan to reform the way the financial system is regulated don't go far enough, Clinton said today.

The proposal announced by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson would streamline regulations and give the Federal Reserve new powers to set rules for lending to and regulating a greater list of financial institutions.

The New York senator also continued to bash presumptive Republican nominee John McCain, accusing him of not having a plan for dealing with the economy. "Today, the Administration, through the Secretary of the Treasury, has announced that finally the Bush Administration is going to take some action to better regulate the financial markets," she said during a roundtable at a diner here Monday. "Well, after years of a wait-and-don't-see approach to the regulatory failures that led to the housing and the credit crisis, they've announced a plan that comes late and falls short. No amount of rearranging the deck chairs can hide the fact that our housing and credit markets are in crisis, and they're sinking deeper every day. Every day we fail to take aggressive action is a day lost. You know, Sen. McCain recently gave speech on the economy, and best I could determine his plan was not to have a plan. If he got the 3:00 am call on the economy, he would just let the phone ring and ring and ring."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (13 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton leads among House supers

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:51 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
We listed the Senate superdelegates endorsements earlier today. We've broken out the House backers as well, and Clinton leads 73-69. That means there are 92 House members who are undecided. Also of note among these House endorsers, 23 of Clinton's 72 are reps from New York (32%). By contrast, nine of Obama's House backers are from Illinois (13%).

Here's how Clinton's and Obama's superdelegate support breaks down:
Among senators: Obama 14-12
Among representatives: Clinton 73-69
Then, among party activists/former party leaders: Clinton leads 170-139
TOTAL: Clinton 255, Obama 222

[EDITOR'S NOTE: An earlier version of this post did not include Murtha for Clinton or Eddie Bernice Johnson for Obama. Also, we do not include Eleanor Holmes Norton, who has endorsed Obama. Though she sits on and votes in committee, her title is delegate, not Congresswoman. It's the old DC license plate joke: Taxation without representation.]

Here's the list of the House backers:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (46 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Massive final-day registration in PA

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 1:29 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Matthew E. Berger
PHILADELPHIA -- While a final number may not be available for a few weeks, the Pennsylvania Department of State has released an update on the number of people registered to vote in the April 22 Democratic primary here. And it shows a massive registration effort on the final day of eligibility.

The state now has 4,119,213 registered Democrats. Since March 24, the last day of eligibility for the primary election, the state has received 33,281 new Democratic registrations and 45,977 party changes to the Democratic Party. The secretary of state’s office is still accepting new registrations and party switches that were postmarked by the deadline.

State officials said the activity on the final day was intense, and these new numbers likely include large swaths of registrations that were collected by both the Obama and Clinton campaigns and submitted just before the deadline.

Since the first of the year, the state has received 101,499 new Democratic applications and 132,688 switches to the Democratic Party.

By contrast, the Republican Party in Pennsylvania now stands at 3,197,586 people. Only 32,191 citizens have joined the Republican roles and 13,937 have switched to the GOP since January 1.

DiscussDiscuss (48 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Reintroducing McCain: Day 1

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 12:47 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy 
MERIDIAN, Miss. -- With a 20-minute long familial history here this morning, John McCain kicked off what his campaign is formally calling the “Service to America” tour meant to reintroduce McCain to voters. But if today was any indication, the tour could accurately be renamed "Faith of my Fathers on Stage." 
 
This morning’s speech was a Cliffs Notes version of the McCain Family story found in the senator’s best-selling autobiography -- written with assistance from senior advisor Mark Salter. The message of the speech focused on how the military service of his ancestors inspired him to serve his country as well. 
 
“The family I was born to, and the family I am blessed with now, made me the man I am, and instilled in me a deep and abiding respect for the social institution that wields the greatest influence in the formation of our individual character and the character of our society,” McCain said. “Government must be attentive to the impact of its policies on families so that it does not through inattention or arrogance make it harder for parents to have the resources to succeed in the greatest work of their lives -- raising their children.” 
 
The several hundred people seated in the audience sat quietly for the first 15 minutes of McCain’s talk before applauding loudly when the candidate called for the federal government to be mindful of its effects on the American family.
 
Going forward, McCain visits his high school and college in the coming days when he is expected to outline how his education shaped his character and prepared him for the presidency.

*** UPDATE *** Howard Dean's response to the McCain tour, via the DNC: "John McCain deserves our respect for his service to our country, but no reinvention tour can change the fact that a vote for him is a vote for four more years of President Bush's failed policies. No matter how many times he tries to reintroduce himself, the voters already know that John McCain is out of touch with the challenges facing working families, admits he doesn't understand the economy, and is willing to keep our troops in Iraq for 100 years. John McCain can talk about his past, but only a Democrat can bring the change the American people want for the future."

DiscussDiscuss (34 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

On those North Carolina endorsements

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 12:46 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
Several Democratic sources familiar with North Carolina politics expressed surprise at today's Wall Street Journal story, saying that -- although several members of the delegation are likely Obama backers -- an en masse endorsement would include nods from several Dems who most expected to stay on the sidelines in the Clinton-Obama race.

A staff member close to one of the superdelegates in question confirms there is no truth to the story.

Per Dan Leistikow, a spokesman for the Obama campaign in North Carolina, "Despite the Wall Street Journal’s optimism, none of them has said told our campaign that they are ready to announce their endorsement of Senator Obama -- so we’ll keep working on it."

One Democrat who supports Obama did say that some elected officials and candidates for office in the state have expressed concern about a prolonged nomination, saying that many believe that a popular election result overturned by superdelegates "would destroy the party.." A mass endorsement by the delegation would send a clear message of party unity, he said.

But as of today, added another source familiar with the story, the idea might have simply been born of one Obama supporter's wishful thinking.

DiscussDiscuss (21 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Tar Heel politicking

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:03 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann and NBC's Mark Murray
Obama is heavily favored in the May 6 North Carolina primary. And not surprisingly, the Clinton campaign has downplayed expectations there (just like Team Obama has downplayed expectations in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Kentucky).

But -- in a nod to the power of surrogates -- it's worth noting that the Clinton clan has visited the Tar Heel State more often than the Obama clan has since March 4. 

Barack Obama -- 2 days, 3 total stops
Michelle Obama -- 0 days, 0 total stops

Hillary Clinton -- 1 day, 3 total stops
Bill Clinton -- 2 days, 9 total stops
Chelsea Clinton -- 2 days, 4 total stops

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Court declines FBI Jefferson appeal

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 10:35 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams
In something of a surprise, the U.S. Supreme Court today declined to hear an appeal involving the FBI's unprecedented search of the Capitol Hill offices of Congressman William Jefferson.

A federal appeals court ruled that the FBI wrongly used its own agents look through the material seized to determine what might be covered by congressional privilege. This is a considerable victory for Jefferson, largely validating his objections to the search and giving him certain bragging rights. But prosecutors claim they have sufficient evidence independent of the search. The cash in his freezer, for example, was found well before Jefferson's offices were searched.

The court today handed down just one decision, a victory for Delaware. The state hoped to stop construction of a proposed British Petroleum liquified natural gas port on the New Jersey side of the Delaware River. The court, acting in its special role as the sole decider of disputes between the states, ruled Delaware has a say in what's built on the New Jersey side of the river involving projects that would extend into the river, where both states have joint authority.

DiscussDiscuss (9 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama leads among Senate supers

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 10:29 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
With the endorsement by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) for Obama, we decided to take a look at who each Democratic senator is backing. Obama, it turns out, leads Clinton, 14-12. Twenty senators are uncommitted. A couple of notes... excluded from the list is the Florida-Michigan contingent of senators: Debbie Stabenow, of Michigan, who is backing Clinton; Carl Levin, of Michigan, who is uncommitted; and Bill Nelson, of Florida, who has endorsed Clinton. Also excluded are senators, who caucus with Democrats, but do not have a vote at convention: Bernie Sanders (I-VT-Uncommitted) and Joe Lieberman (I/D-CT-McCain). Lieberman was stripped of his superdelegate status when he endorsed McCain.

Here's the full list of the Senate superdelegate endorsements:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (50 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Should she stay or go?

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:23 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Stay or go? To paraphrase that old Clash song, “Should she stay or should she go?” (“If I go there will be trouble; and if I stay it will be double…”) That was the question that continued to dominate the Beltway chatter over the weekend. The problem for Clinton is that she's busier trying to prove her relevance in the process rather than debating Obama about the economy, health care, or Iraq. Indeed, Clinton told the Washington Post that she’s in until the end. But it's simply not good for any campaign to have call up major national reporters to tell them that. A few questions we have about this interview: Did the need to do this come from financial duress, superdelegate duress, or both? Have more folks contacted the Clintons privately that the press hasn't heard about that's giving this pushback from the campaign more of a sense of urgency? Could some Clinton supporters (or even active campaigners, paid or unpaid) be ready to bolt? We in the media have been accused of creating this sense of urgency over whether she should stay in the race or not. But did Clinton herself need to add to the storyline with this interview? Apparently, she did. Nevertheless, more superdelegates are flocking to Obama. According to the Wall Street Journal, and confirmed by NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) will endorse Obama today. And the Journal also reports that Obama will get the support of North Carolina’s entire Democratic congressional delegation before that state’s primary on May 6.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on the big superdelegate add for Barack Obama while Hillary Clinton continues to fight calls to drop out of the race.

*** “I’m reporting for duty,” part II: The comparisons between McCain's '08 bid and Kerry's in '04 have been unmistakable: Both men, early on, were their party's overwhelming favorites to win the nomination; then they encountered trouble and got overshadowed by other candidates; and then -- almost out of nowhere -- they locked up the nomination. Now, as McCain today embarks on his "Service to America" tour across the country, there's another comparison between the two men: the emphasis of their military experience. Today, McCain stumps in Meridian, MS, where he served as a flight instructor and where an airfield is named after his grandfather. Per excerpts of his speech, McCain will discuss his family’s lifetime of service, as well as his thoughts on how the government can support parents’ ability to raise their children. On Tuesday, he’s at Episcopal High School in Alexandria, VA, where he graduated from high school. On Wednesday, it’s to Annapolis, MD, where he attended the US Naval Academy. On Thursday, he heads to Pensacola and Jacksonville, FL, where he served stateside. And on Saturday, he gives a speech in Arizona, which he now calls home.

*** But biography isn’t everything: McCain's military service -- including his five years as a POW in Vietnam -- is without a doubt one of the central narratives of his life and his political career. It is also something that clearly distinguishes him from both Obama and Clinton. But as Bill Kristol writes in today’s New York Times, you can’t win presidential on biography alone. “If voters had simply looked at the biographies of the major-party candidates, they would have chosen George H. W. Bush in 1992, Bob Dole in 1996, Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. Instead, they rejected four veterans who served in wartime (and who also had considerable experience in public life) for Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, who had lesser résumés, both civilian and military.” Kristol adds, “Campaign consultants like to say elections are about the present and the future more than the past.” Also, keep this in mind: If McCain fails to win the presidency, it will likely mean that no Vietnam War veteran will ever be president. That should keep historical psychologists busy for years.

*** The Texas three-step: Over the weekend, we finally got an idea of the complete Texas caucus results. But we still don't have final results. As for the change in the delegate count, NBC had already allocated all but nine of the 67 caucus delegates up for grabs. The Obama campaign is claiming they've secured seven of those nine; the Clinton campaign is not projecting their caucus delegate count but believes Obama may only net five of those nine, not seven. Still, the best case for Obama, based on our totals, is a net of five additional delegates -- so not a massive change in the numbers. He may be getting more superdelegate endorsements today than he'll net out of what's remaining in Texas.

*** The Goreacle speaketh: One person who doesn’t seem eager to step in and resolve the Clinton-Obama fight is Al Gore. "I'm not applying for the job of broker,” he said on 60 Minutes last night. But what Gore is doing is launching is “a three-year, $300 million campaign Wednesday aimed at mobilizing Americans to push for aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, a move that ranks as one of the  most ambitious and costly public advocacy campaigns in U.S. history," the Washington Post writes. Climate change advocates have been frustrated that the issue is not yet a voting issue; Gore et al have succeeded in creating awareness, but they have yet to create a sense of urgency on the issue. That's what this campaign is designed to create.

*** Opening Day: Today is Opening Day, and after last night's amazing Nationals ending (thank you, Ryan Zimmerman!), it's a reminder that the beauty of Opening Day is that fans of EVERY team have high hopes and can think, "Maybe this is the year..." Well, today is a new Opening Day for McCain as he tries to jumpstart his general election campaign. And then there's Clinton, who desperately needs an Opening Day; the campaign needs that hope again. And as for Obama, he's like the baseball team who has a seven-game lead going into the final month of the season but hasn't yet clinched. The pennant appears to be his for the taking, but for some reason the veteran team chasing him keeps hanging around and hanging around…

*** On the trail: Elsewhere today, both Clinton and Obama are in Pennsylvania: Clinton hosts a roundtable discussion in Harrisburg and an economic rally in Fairless Hills, while Obama has a town hall in Lancaster and a rally in (cue Billy Joel) Allentown. Also, Bill Clinton stumps in Oregon.
 
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 22 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 36 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 218 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 295 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

DiscussDiscuss (91 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: In until the end

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:21 AM by Mark Murray

On Sunday, the Washington Post ran this front-page story, “In her most definitive comments to date on the subject, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton sought … to put to rest any notion that she will drop out of the presidential race, pledging in an interview to not only compete in all the remaining primaries but also continue until there is a resolution of the disqualified results in Florida and Michigan… ‘I know there are some people who want to shut this down and I think they are wrong,’ Clinton said in an interview during a campaign stop here Saturday. ‘I have no intention of stopping until we finish what we started and until we see what happens in the next 10 contests and until we resolve Florida and Michigan. And if we don't resolve it, we'll resolve it at the convention -- that's what credentials committees are for.’”

“‘We cannot go forward until Florida and Michigan are taken care of, otherwise the eventual nominee will not have the legitimacy that I think will haunt us,’ said the senator from New York. ‘I can imagine the ads the Republican Party and John McCain will run if we don't figure out how we can count the votes in Michigan and Florida.’’

 “As the smoke cleared from this weekend's regional Democratic conventions, Barack Obama emerged with a majority of the state's at-large presidential nominating delegates and possibly a majority of all Texas delegates,” the Houston Chronicle reports. “But Hillary Rodham Clinton's supporters vowed Sunday to continue the fight for Texas delegates all the way to this summer's state party convention, promising to cut his lead in delegates.” More: "Clinton won the popular vote in the March 4 primaries and a majority of the primary-allotted delegates, giving her a 65-61 lead. Obama's campaign claimed he came out of this weekend's conventions with a 38-29 at-large delegate lead, giving him a five-pledged-delegate lead over Clinton... "Clinton state Chairman Garry Mauro conceded that Obama is likely to have a 37-30 advantage in the at-large delegates, which would give Obama a total lead of three pledged delegates over Clinton."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Looking ahead: General elex preview?

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:19 AM by Mark Murray

The Washington Post goes back and examines the attempt Obama and McCain made to work together on ethics reform. "[W]hat began as a promising collaboration between two men bent on burnishing their reformist credentials collapsed after barely a week. The McCain-Obama relationship came undone amid charges and countercharges, all aired publicly two years ago in an exchange of stark and angry letters. Obama questioned whether McCain sided with GOP leaders rather than searching for a bipartisan solution; McCain accused Obama of ‘typical rhetorical gloss’ and ‘self interested partisan posturing’ by a newcomer seeking to ingratiate himself with party leaders.”

More: “More than two years later, with McCain and Obama potentially poised to go head to head in a presidential campaign with stakes far greater than regulating who picks up steakhouse tabs, the reform fight has emerged as a looking-glass moment of what a fall campaign could resemble. McCain's backers view it as emblematic of Obama's ability to talk grand ideas and aspirations, but also of his ultimate failure to produce substantive results. Obama's supporters contend that the moment was vintage Obama, with the newcomer defusing the feud with a cool demeanor that allowed him to claim the high ground while rolling up his sleeves to eventually help pass a broader ethics overhaul bill in August 2007."

PENNSYLVANIA: The Boston Globe front-pages how the Democrats have moved from talking about NAFTA to “expanding beyond their past populist appeals and using a broader language that can address different experiences of economic change. In Pennsylvania, which on April 22 will host the largest of the remaining contests, Clinton and Obama have turned their emphasis from industrial policy to household economics, such as subprime mortgages, the rising price of gas, supermarket costs, and the interest rates charged on student loans.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (10 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Not paying the bills?

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:17 AM by Mark Murray

So does Clinton have a money problem? Apparently, the campaign is slow at paying bills, particularly for events. And some of these local vendors are actually warning colleagues about getting Clinton money up front. Per the Politico, “Hillary Rodham Clinton’s cash-strapped presidential campaign has been putting off paying hundreds of bills for months — freeing up cash for critical media buys but also earning the campaign a reputation as something of a deadbeat in some small-business circles.”

Moving the goalposts ... again? In Saturday’s New York Times, anonymous Clinton aides said if Clinton didn't win the Indiana primary, they'd urge her to get out. But if she narrowly wins Indiana but loses North Carolina, she'll have a hard time making up ground in the delegate count or the popular vote. There was one other quote that jumped out at us in this NYT piece: Rendell's bizarre claim on if rolls were reversed. “‘Just flip it for a second,’ Mr. Rendell said. ‘Let’s say Senator Clinton was ahead by about 110 delegates and ahead by less than 1 percent of the vote cast, and she and her supporters started to call on Senator Obama to get out. Just picture what the media would be saying. They’d be saying you’re being racist, you’re being everything in the world. It’s nuts! It’s nuts!’”

Really, governor? Really? There wouldn't be TWICE the pressure on Obama to get out than there is right now on Clinton? Rendell has been throwing around the race card easier than most folks of late.

The Los Angeles Times' Finnegan and Z. Barabak point out a fact that has gotten lost with many folks in the media who seem to have amnesia about the Clintons' role leading the Democratic Party in the '90s. "A complication for Clinton, as she courts superdelegates, is the rocky history that she and Bill Clinton have with many in the Democratic establishment. Obama portrays her as a Washington fixture, and after 15 years inside the Beltway -- eight of them as first lady -- the New York senator is very much steeped in the capital and its culture. So, too, are Clinton's campaign team and many of her political allies.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: The re-launch begins

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:15 AM by Mark Murray

Per excerpts of the speech he will give today in Meridian, MS, McCain will say: “As you might know, I was once a flight instructor here at the air field named for my grandfather during my long past and misspent youth. And it’s always good to be in Mississippi, which you could call my ancestral home. Generations of McCains were born and raised in Carroll County, on land that had been in our family since 1848… By all accounts, the McCains of Carroll County were devoted to one another and their traditions; a lively, proud and happy family on the Mississippi Delta. Yet, many McCains left here as young men to pursue careers in what has long been our family’s chosen profession -- the United States Armed Forces.”

More: “The family I was born to, and the family I am blessed with now, made me the man I am, and instilled in me a deep and abiding respect for the social institution that wields the greatest influence in the formation of our individual character and the character of our society.” 
 
McCain’s campaign also has released a Web video highlighting his family’s military service.

The New York Times curtain-raises McCain's general election kickoff week with a fact that many folks have whispered about for some time. "With attention focused on the Democrats’ infighting for the presidential nomination, Senator John McCain is pressing ahead to the general election but has yet to sign up one critical constituency: the big-money people who powered the Bush fund-raising machine."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (6 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Another super, exaggeration

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray

Obama drew 20,000 to Penn State. Check out the photo of him with the Penn State football jersey. Wasn’t he doing that in Austin, too?

Another super for Obama. He picks up the endorsement of Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar today, giving him another superdelegate supporter. The endorsement will occur in a conference call at 10:30 am ET. “In a statement provided to The Associated Press, Klobuchar said Obama ‘has inspired an enthusiasm and idealism that we have not seen in this country in a long time.’” Also: "North Carolina's seven Democratic House members are poised to endorse Sen. Obama as a group -- just one has so far -- before that state's May 6 primary, several Democrats say." But Obama spokesman Bill Burton tells First Read that there will be no endorsements from North Carolina congressmen coming today. "That did not come from our campaign, we have not confirmed that," Burton adds.

The Washington Post caught Obama in an exaggeration about the Kennedy family role in getting his father to America. It turns out the Kennedys were not involved in any Kenyan airlifts until after Obama's father was safely in Hawaii. What is it about politicians trying too hard to be a part of history? Sometimes, there isn't a destiny; that's ok too.

The Los Angeles Times does something many Obama supporters have been asking the media to do for weeks: put Rev. Wright in some context. "Examining the full content of Wright's sermons and delivery style yields a far more complex message, though one that some will still find objectionable. For more than 30 years, Wright walked churchgoers every Sunday along a winding road from rage to reconciliation, employing a style that validated both. ‘He's voicing a reality that those people experience six days a week,’ said the Rev. Dwight Hopkins, a professor at the University of Chicago Divinity School and a Trinity member. ‘In that sense, he's saying they're not insane. That helps them to function the other six days of the week.’”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (20 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Down the ballot: Moonbeam v. Ebay?

Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:06 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

Last week, we alerted you to the possibility that Ebay CEO Meg Whitman was pondering a gov run in 2010 in California. Well, her opponent could very well be ... Jerry Brown. "Brown spoke at the state Democratic Party convention Saturday, and boy, did he sound an awful lot like a candidate for Golden State governor -- again. Eerie.”

“Brown, who served two terms as governor from 1975 to 1983 before term limits took effect, reminded his Democratic audience assembled in San Jose of some of his ‘highlights,’ like getting rid of former Gov. Ronald Reagan's bulletproof limousine and using a blue Plymouth from the state motor pool. Brown said he kept the Plymouth for eight years and put 240,000 miles on it, adding: ‘Now that's sustainability.’”

DiscussDiscuss (4 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's charm offensive in PA

Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:12 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
STATE COLLEGE, PA -- Obama has launched a charm offensive in Pennsylvania, forgoing days packed with town halls and cheering crowds at rallies to make small unannounced stops that take the locals by surprise.

Case in point, trying not to strike out in Pennsylvania to Clinton, Obama went bowling Saturday night at Pleasant Valley Lanes in Altoona, five minutes from a hot dog shop that he had visited earlier in the day.

When Obama walked in with Sen. Bob Casey, who recently endorsed him, locals stopped munching mid-fry to stare. The presidential hopeful shook hands, posed for pictures and then joined local Roxanne Hart to bowl a few frames.

"I haven't bowled in 30 years," Obama declared before putting on size 13 1/2 shoes. Casey joined in, and the two rolled. Casey's ball went into the left gutter; Obama's rolled into the right. And so it went, though the locals didn't seem to mind the poor performance. Little kids offered advice and joined in the game. Casey managed to improved steadily, though the last time he bowled was in high school. Obama's balls on the on the other hand meandered their way into the gutter time and time again.

"My economic plan is better than my bowling!" Obama declared at one point to the crowd that had gathered around the lane, growing with each frame as patrons texted and called friends and family to see the political spectacle.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (91 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Chelsea says parents disagree on NAFTA

Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2008 11:04 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
DURHAM, NC -- Asked yesterday how her mother's stance on NAFTA would correct economic problems without "contradicting" her father's engineering of the policy, former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton said that the trade deal is one area of disagreement between her parents.

"Well, we don't agree on everything as a family," she told the questioner at a Q&A session of North Carolina's Young Democrats in Durham yesterday. "My mother and father agree on most things, not everything," she added. "And what you're talking about is one example of that."

NAFTA is likely to be a major issue in the state for the presidential primary, as many residents blame the loss of textile and manufacturing jobs on the trade deal spearheaded by Bill Clinton's Administration.

Chelsea Clinton also delivered an impassioned defense of her mother's candidacy when a friendly questioner asked if she thought her mother has been mischaracterized by the press and the public during the prolonged nomination fight.

"I didn't really get how much sexism there was in this country," she said, citing examples of voters who had approached her with concerns about a woman's capacity to be commander in chief. She singled out gag gift figurines of her mother as a "nutcracker" ("not in anything that I'd consider a respectful posture," said Chelsea) as particularly offensive.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (44 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill praises Hillary, criticizes media

Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:59 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
WILLIAMSPORT, PA -- Calling Hillary Clinton “the most unconventional person I have ever seen to be running for president,” Bill Clinton yesterday highlighted his wife’s advocacy for children as a young woman as an example of her work as a change-maker.

Bill Clinton, still wearing a greenish suit after his visit to a St. Patrick’s Day parade earlier, told a crowd of several hundred about Hillary’s work after law school for the Children’s Defense Fund, saying that part of her efforts led to legislation guaranteeing all children the right to a public school education without regard for disabilities.

“It changed lives for millions and millions of families. And she was doing that when she was a young woman, making changes in other people’s lives,” he said.

He then referred to the three remaining candidates, saying all were “admirable people,” but that if one compared their records as an agent of change “it is not close.” But, he added, the coverage of the race hasn’t borne it out.

“She’s the most unconventional person I have ever seen to be running for president, because she did most of this before she had an elected office,” he said. “[But] you never read about any of stuff in the press, do you? Because the intermediaries of the campaign, these kinds of things don’t matter to them, because they don’t need a president, they need a story. They want a feeling. You gotta decide whether you need a president or not.”

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Calls for HRC to quit premature

Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:53 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
JOHNSTOWN, PA -- Obama yesterday said that Sen. Patrick Leahy's call for Clinton to leave the race was premature, declaring that Clinton had a right to stay in the race as long as she wanted.
 
"Yeah. I hadn't talked to Pat about it," Obama said when asked about Leahy's comments and if it was a premature move on the part of his surrogates.
 
"My attitude is that Sen. Clinton can run as long as she wants. Her name is on the ballot. And she is a fierce and formidable competitor, and she obviously believes that she would make the best nominee and the best opponent," he said. "I think that you know she should be able to compete and her supporters should be able to support her for as long as they are willing or able."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (24 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton fundraising problem?

Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2008 11:56 AM by Chuck Todd

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann and NBC's Chuck Todd
Check out this line from today's Bill Clinton-signed fundraising email for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign: "We're facing a big deadline on Monday. Our opponents and the media will scrutinize our fundraising reports and look for any sign of weakness. By making a contribution today, you can help make sure we show nothing but strength."

Of course, the campaign could be playing an expectations game.

DiscussDiscuss (0 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama says he'll throwback to Bush 41

Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2008 11:29 AM by Chuck Todd


From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
GREENBURG, PA -- Barack Obama promised that his foreign policy would be a return to what he says was the realist approach practiced by George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan.

"My foreign policy is actually a return to the traditional realistic policy of George Bush's father, of John F. Kennedy, of in some ways Ronald Reagan," he said Friday.  A voter at the town hall in Greenburg had asked Obama to respond to charges that his foreign policy was naïve.  

"It is George Bush who has been naïve and it's people like John McCain and unfortunately some democrats that have facilitated him acting in these naïve ways that have caused us so much damage in our reputation in the world," Obama said.

Drawing on the example of the first Gulf War, Obama said that the first President Bush had "conducted a Gulf War with allies that ended up costing twenty billion dollars and left us stronger because they were realistic."

"Remember, people were saying why didn't you go into Baghdad and overthrow Saddam Hussein?  The realists understood that that would be a nightmare.  And it wasn't worth our national interests," Obama added.
CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (0 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Fact check: Obama and oil

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:14 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
GREENBURG, Pa. -- The Clinton campaign today accused the Obama campaign of "false advertising," claiming that a recent ad Obama released in Pennsylvania was disngenous because Obama has been the recipient of more than $200,000 from the oil and gas industry.

In the ad, Obama says, "I'm Barack Obama, and I don't take money from oil companies or lobbyists, and I won't let them block change any more."

Obama has taken $213,884 from the oil and gas industry as of Feb. 29th, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Sen. Hillary Clinton has taken $306,813 in that same period.

Two of Obama's campaign bundlers are also CEOs for oil and gas companies, per a list released on his campaign Web site.

Robert Cavnar, listed as a bundler who has raised between $50,000 to $100,000 for the campaign, is the chairman and CEO of Mission Resources Corp., a Houston-based firm. George Kaiser, also listed in the same $50,000 to $100,000 category, is the CEO of Tulsa-based Kaiser-Francis Oil Company.

"It's unfortunate that Senator Obama is using false advertising to explain why he can be trusted to do something about energy prices," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said.  "Senator Obama says he doesn't take campaign contributions from oil companies but the reality is that Exxon, Shell, and others are among his donors."

Obama routinely criticizes companies like Exxon-Mobil on the stump, but over the course of his presidential campaign he has taken more than $30,000 from individuals working for Exxon-Mobil. Clinton has taken more than $20,000 from Exxon-Mobil in the same period.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (66 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: End race? 'Bunch of bull'

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:26 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
KANNAPOLIS, N.C. -- Just in case you were wondering what Hillary Clinton's No. 1 fan thinks of recent calls for her to drop out of the race for the Democratic nomination, Bill Clinton has three words for you: "Bunch of Bull."

"All these people tell you, 'Aw, we oughta shut this thing down now; the Democrats are so divided,'" Clinton said at a campaign event here. "That’s a bunch of bull."

The former president went on to note that he did not earn enough delegates to clinch the 1992 nomination until June of that year, around the same time that the final primary votes will be cast this year.

He also argued, as he often does, against the "disenfranchisement" of voters in Michigan and Florida. "She wants you to have your say," he added.

Notably, Clinton described the remaining primaries as contests for the popular vote (not for delegates.) "Now we’re going to have to go all the way through to the end to see who has the most popular votes," he said. "And that’s good."

DiscussDiscuss (43 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Pelosi's 'tension' concern

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:22 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Mike Viqueira
The following is a fundraising appeal sent out today to Democratic supporters from Nancy Pelosi, wherein the speaker expresses concern about the tone of the Democratic presidential contest spilling over and harming House races.

Dear ,
Here's what you and I can't let happen. We can't allow the tension and pressures of a spirited Presidential contest to spill over and harm hard-working Democratic candidates running to strengthen our Democratic majority in the House.

I will do whatever it takes to protect our candidates and make sure their campaigns to drive change forward don't skip a beat. I need you to do the same. Please support our candidates now with a donation to the DCCC before the critical March 31st deadline hits by going to www.dccc.org/deadline.
Throughout the Presidential nominating process, I have been so proud to watch Democrats turn out in record numbers and demonstrate enormous grassroots energy. And soon we will have an exciting presidential nominee who will make our entire party proud.

She or he will lead our energized and united Democratic Party in the larger fight against John McCain, and his plan for 100 more years of war in Iraq. Now is the time to capitalize on the excitement that is sweeping the nation to ensure that our next President has a strong Democratic majority in the House to work with as we undo the damage from President Bush's failed economic policies.

Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House of Representatives

DiscussDiscuss (13 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama IA director to head PA effort

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:23 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
Paul Tewes, Obama's state director in Iowa, will head to the Keystone State tomorrow to take over the campaign's GOTV operation.
 
"Now that the voter registraton deadline has passed, we have entered the GOTV phase of the campaign in Pennslyvania," Deputy Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said. "Tewes has joined the Pennsylvania campaign on the ground here to lead this effort."
 
Pfeiffer added that Jim DeMay, who had been the state director up until this point will "continue to play an advisory role our campaign." DeMay was Gore's Pennsylvania state director in 2000.
 
Added Pfieffer, "While we remain the underodog, we are working as hard as we can to get as many votes as possible."
 
Tewes has a strong track record. Under his leadership, the Obama campaign conducted an extensive grassroots effort in Iowa that helped the campaign win by 8 points.

DiscussDiscuss (44 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton's Indiana expectations game

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:16 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
MISHAWAKA, Ind. -- Let the expectations game begin.

As Hillary Clinton kicked off a long day of campaigning in the Hoosier State Friday, her campaign painted the fight here as an uphill struggle.

State director Robby Mook cited a statewide Howey-Gauge poll, showing Clinton running behind Obama and said that was partly due to his being from a neighboring state. The most recent Howey-Gauge poll found, taken in mid-February, showed Obama leading by 15 points.

Still, Mook said the campaign was active in every congressional district and would be announcing new office openings in the coming days. Clinton is set to hold a press conference in Hammond, Ind., this afternoon to announce the endorsement of seven mayors from cities in the Western part of the state, bordering the Chicago media market, an area seen as favorable to Obama. None of the mayors are superdelegates.


Clinton, who trails Obama in pledged delegates, the popular vote and the number of states won, needs to do well in the remaining contests to bolster her argument that having won several of the biggest states and most recent states, she will be more electable. For at least the third time this week, the New York senator referred this morning to calls from some for her to drop out of the race, this time citing a poll by Rasmussen, an organization that does not use the preferred telephone interview survey method. CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (51 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama on Casey endorsement

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:05 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
PITTSBURGH -- Obama called Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey’s endorsement one of the most meaningful endorsements he's received on the campaign trail.

"You know, I did not press him on this endorsement, you know there were some people that I was nagging all the time," Obama said of reaching out to Casey. "Bob I thought to myself, there's great reason for me to press him; I told him I'd love to have his support, but I understood that you know we're behind in the Pennsylvania polls. I just want to say it would have been easy for Bob just to stay out of it, just to stay neutral. I think everybody would have accepted that.

"But when he called me and said, ‘I think this is the right thing to do,’ it meant as much to me as any endorsement that I've received on the campaign trail," Obama added.

Casey introduced Obama and spoke to the potential of his leadership.

VIDEO: Watch Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey’s remarks while endorsing Barack Obama.

"This campaign is a chance for America, a chance for America to chart a new course, to go down a different path," Casey said of his endorsement. "A path, first of all, of change, a path of a new kind of politics, a path -- and finally a path of hope and healing." CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (59 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Chelsea: Mom, better prez than dad

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:56 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Matthew Berger
ALLENTOWN, Pa. -- Chelsea Clinton was asked whether her mother would be a better president than her father, and she said yes.

Speaking at Lehigh Valley Hospital Friday, she laughed when a man in the front row asked her to choose between her parents.

“His question is, ‘Do I think my mother will be a better president than my father,’” she said. “Well, again, I don’t take anything for granted, but hopefully with Pennsylvania’s help, she will be our next president, and yes, I do think she’ll be a better president.”

Clinton spoke for more than an hour at the hospital, taking mostly questions about healthcare issues.

DiscussDiscuss (53 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

There's a slip...

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:31 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Think this will make Jon Stewart?

Clinton supporter Joe Sestak was on with NBC's Andrea Mitchell during the 1 pm MSNBC hour, and slipped in one response. Mitchell asked him if he was concerned that if this fight goes to convention that it could tear apart the party.

Sestak replied that he's not, that he's confident that if Obama were to lose the nomination, he'd turn around and say, "Support her." And if Clinton were to lose the nomination, she would turn around and say, "Support me."

Whoops.

Shaking his head, Sestak quickly corrected: "Support him."

We know what he meant, but still funny.

DiscussDiscuss (63 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's Indiana ad

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:34 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Here's Obama's latest aworking-class appeal...

Here's the script:
OBAMA [with backdrop of factory]: I moved to chicago to help workers, whose lives were torn apart when steel plants like this one left town. For decades, politicians have talked about protecting jobs, but the power of Washington lobbyists stops anything from changing. I'm Barack Obama. I'm the only candidate who doesn't take their money, and they won't run my White HOuse.

We'll fix our trade laws [on screen: "Register to vote by April 7th], end tax breaks for companies who ship jobs overseas and give them to those who create jobs here in America [on screen: IN.BarackObama.com 866-675-2008]. That's why I approve this message.

*** UPDATE *** NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann adds that Obama is also up today with his first ad in North Carolina. *** UPDATE 2 *** Per NBC's Lauren Appelbaum,  The ad, "Enough," originally started airing in Iowa Dec. 21, and it was also used in in Maine, Maryland and Virginia. It is also focused on working class, economic issues.

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

HRC: Don't count me out, contribute

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:17 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Hillary Clinton has a fundraising message: Don't count me out. And she sets the bar for the upcoming primaries, that this isn't just about Pennsylvania.

Here's the email:

Have you noticed the pattern?

Every time our campaign demonstrates its strength and resilience, people start to suggest we should end our pursuit of the Democratic nomination.

Those anxious to force us to the sidelines aren't doing it because they think we're going to lose the upcoming primaries. The fact is, they're reading the same polls we are, and they know we are in a position to win.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (38 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Leahy: Clinton 'ought to withdraw'

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:47 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
High profile Obama backer, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), told Vermont Public Radio that he thinks Clinton should drop out and back Obama.

"There is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough
delegates to get the nomination," Leahy said. "She ought to withdraw and she ought to be backing Senator Obama. Now, obviously that's a decision that only she can make. Frankly I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."

VIDEO: Sen. Patrick Leahy explains his view that the ongoing political tussling between Obama and Clinton may be helping McCain’s candidacy.

Here's the full transcript:< CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton leads with Jewish supers

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:17 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Clinton leads Obama 36-12 among the Jewish superdelegates, according to a survey by the Forward, a Jewish newspaper. Twenty-six Jewish supers are undecided.

Here's the Forward's list of who's fallen behind whom and who's undecided:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Nader's foray into '08

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:57 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From MSNBC.com’s Andy Merten
For Ralph Nader, there are two ways to win.            
 
“I’m interested in the issues,” he told MSNBC.com in an interview this week. “There’s two ways to succeed:  One way is to beat them by getting more votes, and we could turn this into a three-way race,” he insisted, adding, “And the second is to have them take our issues and run with them.”
 
But Nader, who announced his fifth presidential candidacy on Meet the Press last month, isn’t holding his breath for McCain, Clinton or Obama to become mouth pieces for his pro-consumer, high corporate oversight presidential platform any time soon. Asked if Obama’s message of change quelled his frustration with two-party domination, he said he doesn’t see any real differences between the Illinois senator and his presidential opponents.

“I think he’s a corporate Democrat,” he said of Obama, likening him to Clinton and McCain. “As a senator, he has not championed the cause of consumers and workers against corporations.
 
“If people don’t make demands on him or whoever else is running for the major party nominations, if they win, they won’t have any mandate. And they’ll go into a place called the White House, which is a very elaborate and nice corporate prison.”

VIDEO: Ralph Nader speaks with MSNBC.com about his platform of consumer advocacy. 
 
But Nader doesn’t seem delusional about his likelihood of winning the presidency later this year. After all, he garnered just 0.38% of the vote in 2004 after receiving  2.74% in 2000. (He is still seen by many Democrats as having cost Al Gore the election, particularly in Florida.) Instead, Nader likens his candidacy to political movements of the past that have spurred larger social change.&. 

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (44 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Professor vs. Senior Lecturer

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:17 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
The University of Chicago released a statement clarifying Obama's status at the university. He is a senior lecturer and has cited that he is a constitutional law professor on the trail. That's something that has caused some criticism and allegations of exaggeration. It's something the Clinton campaign has pushed as well in conference calls with reporters in the past week.

Here's the statement:
"The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

DiscussDiscuss (87 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Obama's step forward

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:41 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Domenico Montanaro
*** Obama's Step Forward? Taking the week cumulatively, is there any other way to look at it other than a big step forward for Obama? Every piece of initial evidence from last week showing potential trouble for Obama faded, particularly on the polling front, whether nationally or in key states. Toss in the frustration the Clinton campaign is showing (why are they letting us see them sweat so much, particularly over Pelosi and Florida/Michigan?). And end it with serious flirtation with a potential running mate that could solve many of Obama's problems in fell swoop when it comes to Jewish voters and voters worried about his lack of executive experience (Michael Bloomberg), and it's been a very good week for Obama. That said, did Obama miss an opportunity this week? The media, once again, seems ready to write Clinton's campaign obit and had Obama unveiled, say, 20 to 25 superdelegate endorsements in a 24-to-48-hour period, that would have fed a Clinton obit wildfire. The fact that the Obama campaign hasn't done this means they either are being overly cautious or they just don't have as many superdelegate endorsements in their back pocket.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd discusses Obama's endorsement by Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey. 
 
*** Being John McCain: One of the toughest things for a presidential candidate that is supposedly so well-known is having the discipline to re-introduce yourself to voters. McCain is doing that next week and begins, in fact, today with the unveiling of a new TV ad which emphasizes what folks probably know a little bit about, his heroism in Vietnam. The tag line in the ad -- "John McCain The American president Americans have been waiting for" -- makes it clear that the campaign plans to use the hero card a lot. And it's also a subtle reminder that if McCain is elected, he too could be a historic figure, which is something the campaign might be worried is getting lost in the Obama-Clinton euphoria in the media and the electorate. Elevating McCain on a pedestal and creating this sense of destiny appears to be part of what the campaign is hoping to create next week. More importantly, what the campaign needs to have happen following next week is a mini-surge in the polls. There's something about his small lead nationally that doesn't seem to be big enough right now. Once Democrats settle on a nominee, that candidate will see a poll surge of sorts, and McCain isn't going to want that surge to move his numbers from dead heat to 10 points down. Better that the surge goes from 10 points up to dead heat. So measure the success of next week by what kind of lead McCain starts building (if any) in the national polls.


 
*** Veepstakes: Who knew Mitt Romney was going to work so hard to get on the ticket. It's one thing to endorse McCain, he HAD to do that. But helping him raise money in multiple states and doing a mini-fly around is clearly above and beyond. While on paper it seems unlikely that McCain-Romney is a winning ticket, think about where the battleground will be in a match up with Obama: it'll be in the Midwest and West, two places where Romney could help. Obama's electoral map is much more heavy on western states and will be much more precarious in the rust belt, particularly Michigan (a Romney home state). In addition, a surge in Mormon support in places like Colorado and Nevada could help a McCain-Romney ticket hold off a surprisingly popular Obama in those states. Many a state poll has shown that Obama, more so than Clinton, has a better shot at putting three of the four corner states in play (Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico). Toss in Montana, and it's clear that McCain may indeed need to find someone who can help him in his home region.
 
*** Back to MI/FL: Need more evidence this Democratic fight could be headed to Denver? Clinton yesterday was asked on FOX how she could get the Michigan/Florida delegates seated. "We can always go to the convention -- that's what credentials fights are for," she said, assertively. And check this, a new online petition urging Howard Dean to count the votes from Florida and Michigan, which was, per Hotline, “launched by HRC bundlers." Once again, this could be Clinton supporters who think they are helping but in fact are hurting. But because there is such a level of strategic distrust between the Clinton money folks and the team running the campaign, there's a lot of freelancing going on and as much as we may know it's not something the actual Clinton campaign is pushing, that isn't the perception being left to those undecided superdelegates.   
 
*** The delegate count: With Sen. Bob Casey’s (D-PA) endorsement of Obama (and joining of his bus tour), Obama has now picked up three superdelegates since Wednesday (Don Williams of CT and Dan Lipinski of IL are the other two). By the way, Rahm “I’m staying neutral” Emanuel is now the ONLY remaining elected superdelegate from Illinois NOT to endorse. Here’s the count: Obama leads among pledged delegates 1408-1251; Clinton leads now among superdelegates, 255-221. Added together, Obama's overall delegate lead is 123: 1629-1506. BTW, on the Casey front, it actually shouldn't be that surprising. Casey and Rendell are usually on opposite sides. What's ironic about the endorsement is that Casey actually needs to emulate the electoral victory of Rendell in that contentious Rendell-Casey '02 Dem GOV race more so than Casey, whose voters are probably leaning more Clinton. 
 
*** On the trail: Clinton makes four stops in Indiana with three town halls and one roundtable, all focused on the economy; McCain raises money in Las Vegas, then spends the weekend down in Phoenix; Obama appears on The View and campaigns in Pittsburgh and holds a town hall in Greensburg; and Bill Clinton is in North Carolina.
 
Greensburg; and Bill Clinton is in North Carolina.
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 25 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 39 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 221 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 298 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (63 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:36 AM by Domenico Montanaro

PENNSYLVANIA: 4/22 (158 delegates)
Obama has some catching up to do to match the Clinton campaign’s advantage in organization and support in Pennsylvania. 
 
The Clinton office was confused by a volunteer’s behavior and after an Internet search determined he was an Obama volunteer. “‘I was just there to check things out,’ said Sam Glenzer, who oddly used his real name when signing in at the Clinton campaign office. Glenzer said he had nothing nefarious in mind.” 
 
NORTH CAROLINA: 5/6 (115 delegates)
NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann notes an incredibly busy schedule for Bill Clinton. Today, he does a whopping seven-stop campaign blitz through western North Carolina, starting in Greensboro and working his way to liberal enclave Asheville. Along the way he'll stop in a series of towns of 40,000 or less, including Hickory. ("There are Democrats in Hickory?" jokes a local operative.) The schedule looks a lot like Clinton's daily event roster in Texas -- rapid-fire stops geared less at media markets than at the sheer volume of potential hands for the former president to shake. Any surprise that the campaign here is masterminded by Ace Smith, the engineer of Clinton's Texas win?
 
Asheville area superdelegate Carol Peterson will be in attendance at tomorrow's appearance by Bill Clinton. Peterson, a DNC member, has said she'll remain uncommitted through the primary. 
 
Hillary Clinton's visit to the state gets local coverage here, here, and here
 
Does Hillary Clinton know the difference between Eastern and Western Carolina BBQ? Enough that she knows it's one of the issues too controversial in the state to risk taking a side on. "I know a question not to answer," she laughed yesterday in response to the inquiry of which style she prefers. In the same interview with the Winston-Salem Journal, she denied that her husband's "other stuff" remark in Charlotte last week was "a negative comment about anyone." She also said that no one other than a president can claim experience with the kind of emergency invoked by her "3AM" ad, but that she's "been there for a lot of 3am phone calls with my husband." 
 
PUERTO RICO: 6/1 (55 delegates)
Since the island's primary could become important, it's worth noting that Obama's chief supporter in the territory, Gov. Anibal Acevedo Vila, was indicted “of soliciting thousands of dollars in improper contributions in exchange for favors and government contracts on the U.S. commonwealth island." Interestingly, Vila's chief lobbyist in DC is McCain strategist Charlie Black. Nothing like the small world of Washington.

DiscussDiscuss (25 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Health care, N. Ireland...

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:31 AM by Domenico Montanaro

In an extensive interview with the NYT, Clinton talks health care. She "said she would like to cap health insurance premiums at 5 percent to 10 percent of income. The average cost of a family policy bought by an individual in 2006 and 2007 was $5,799, or 10 percent of the median family income of $58,526, according to America’s Health Insurance Plans, a trade group. Some policies cost up to $9,201, or 16 percent of median income."
 
More: "Mrs. Clinton also she said if she could not generate the money needed to pay for universal coverage through other means, she would not object to raising the excise tax on tobacco products, which Congress last increased in 1997 to 39 cents a pack.
 
“I’m a big believer in raising tobacco taxes,” Mrs. Clinton said when asked whether an increase should be on the table. “You know, when we were working on the Children’s Health Insurance Program, that’s the funding stream that the Congress came up with, which was bipartisan, which worked out very well. At some point, there’s going to be diminishing returns. But, sure, why not? I don’t have any objection to that.”
 
“As in her debates with Mr. Obama and other contenders, Mrs. Clinton displayed an easy command of health policy in the 45-minute interview, conducted in a basement meeting room in the Midtown Manhattan tower that houses her Senate office."
 
AP has a fact-check of sort that doesn't look good for Clinton when it comes to her role in the Northern Ireland peace process. "Clinton's longtime claims to have played a difference-making role in Northern Ireland attracted no criticism until the buildup to St. Patrick's Day this year. To some ears, her most recent comments have raised a false impression that she helped produce the landmark Good Friday peace accord of 1998. Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern came to Clinton's defense, meeting with the senator in Washington -- and making his first phone call to Obama.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Introducing...

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:28 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The campaign unveiled its first TV ad of the general election, which will run, for now, only in New Mexico (5 EVs). This is a state that was carried by Gore in '00 but flipped to Bush in '04. This appears to be a preview of what next week's biography tour will be focused on; getting to know McCain.
 
Full script of the ad, titled: "624787,” his Navy serial number:
MCCAIN: Keep that faith. Keep your courage. Stick together. Stay strong. Do not yield. Stand up. We're Americans. And we'll never surrender. ANNCR: What must a president believe about us? About America? That she is worth protecting? That liberty is priceless?  Our people, honorable? Our future, prosperous, remarkable and free? And, what must we believe about that president? What does he think? Where has he been? Has he walked the walk?
 
INTERVIEWER: What is your rank? JOHN MCCAIN: Lt. Commander in the Navy. INTERVIEWER: And your official number? JOHN MCCAIN: 624787 ANNCR: John McCain The American president Americans have been waiting for.
  
Politico’s Ben Smith points out, “The narrator is Powers Boothe, best known for his work in ‘Deadwood’ and ‘Red Dawn.’”
 
USA Today previews the bio tour McCain is embarking on. He will be "visiting schools and military installations "that have played a significant role in shaping who I am today," as McCain put it in a fundraising letter. Senior campaign adviser Charles Black said, "We do not take it for granted that people know his background." The goal is to fix McCain's image in the voters' minds before the Democrats do it for him -- provided he has the money." Stops include Episcopal High School in Alexandria, Va.; the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.; military bases in Florida and Mississippi; and his political base in Arizona. The son and grandson of admirals, McCain is also expected to discuss his service during the Vietnam War.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (16 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Casey on board

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:27 AM by Domenico Montanaro

A big superdelegate get for Obama, Bob Casey Jr., the frosh senator (and one-time RIVAL of Clinton's chief Pa. supporter, Ed Rendell). Casey who hails from the ultimate working class Dem stronghold of Scranton will campaign extensively for Obama during the candidate's bus tour of the state. Interestingly, Obama, while getting the support of Casey, needs to borrow from the Rendell '02 Dem GOV primary playbook, in order to win the primary, a race that Casey lost.
 
According to the Philly Inq: "The endorsement comes as something of a surprise. Casey, a deliberative and cautious politician, had been adamant about remaining neutral until after the April 22 primary.
 
“Casey was partially influenced by the enthusiasm of his four daughters for Obama. He is expected to help Obama make inroads with white working-class voters who are supportive on gun rights and abortion like the junior senator.” 
 
By the way, isn't this what Casey's fellow Dem frosh Claire McCaskill said when she endorsed?
 
The Washington Post takes a closer look at the Obama online fundraising machine. "Obama's unprecedented online fundraising success is often depicted as a spontaneous reaction to a charismatic candidate, particularly by young, Internet-savvy supporters. But it is the result of an elaborate marketing effort that has left Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, his rival for the Democratic nomination, and Sen. John McCain, the presumed Republican nominee, struggling to catch up.
Obama aides say their goal has been to "build an online relationship" with supporters who will not only give money but also knock on doors and help register voters for the candidate. To do so, they have spent heavily on Internet ads -- $2.6 million in February alone, more than 10 times as much as Clinton and more than 20 times as much as McCain."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (18 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Veepstakes: Bloomberg, Romney

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:23 AM by Domenico Montanaro

BLOOMBERG: Don't believe the NYC mayor and ex-CEO is interested in being Obama's second banana? Then take a look at THIS newsy NYT lead. "It was only hours after Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg finally made it clear that he was not running for president that his chief political guru, Kevin Sheekey, suggested that he would be the perfect running mate for Senator Barack Obama.
 
"In presenting Mr. Obama, Mr. Bloomberg pointedly noted that he had not endorsed a candidate, saying that now was the time for people to listen to the candidates’ ideas. Referring to the “private breakfast” the two men shared at a Midtown coffee shop in November with a throng of news media pressed against the window, Mr. Bloomberg joked that it was his pleasure to introduce him, “and not just because he picked up the check.”
 
“Mr. Obama had kind words for Mr. Bloomberg as well, saying that he had ‘demonstrated extraordinary leadership.’ He joked: ‘The reason I bought breakfast is because I expected payback. I’m no dummy. The mayor was a cheap date that morning. There are some good steakhouses in this city.’”
 
ROMNEY: It is remarkable how much Mitt Romney is helping McCain. If you didn't believe it before, then believe it now, this guy wants the second slot... badly.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (23 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Down the ballot

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:21 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

So Iraq will trump the economy in congressional races? "More than three dozen Democratic congressional candidates banded together yesterday to promise that, if elected, they will push for legislation calling for an immediate drawdown of troops in Iraq that would leave only a security force in place to guard the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad," the Washington Post writes.
 
More: "Rejecting their party leaders' assertions that economic troubles have become the top issue on voters' minds, leaders of the coalition of 38 House and four Senate candidates pledged to make immediate withdrawal from Iraq the centerpiece of their campaigns. ‘The people inside the Beltway don't seem to get how big an issue this is,’ said Darcy Burner, a repeat candidate who narrowly lost to Rep. Dave Reichert (R-Wash.) in 2006.”
 
The group's 36-page plan does not set a specific deadline for when all combat troops must be out of Iraq. "Begin it now, do it as safely as you can and get everyone out," Burner said. "

Here's First Read's writeup.

DiscussDiscuss (7 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Braggin' about former colleague

Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:20 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Former NBC News Political Director Elizabeth Wilner becomes the second senior hire for the new Peter G. Peterson Foundation, whose mission is to focus public attention on, and promote solutions to the key sustainability challenges that threaten America's future: entitlement, health care, and deficit spending.  Wilner will serve as Director of Public Affairs. The new Foundation's CEO is former US Comptroller General David Walker, whom David Broder recently called "perhaps the most outspoken official in Washington warning of the fiscal train wreck that awaits this country unless it mends its ways."  Broder wrote, "No task is more important to our future." 

DiscussDiscuss (1 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: Praising McCain

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:04 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Kristin Wilson
To a crowd of enthusiastic college students at Dickenson College in Carlisle, Pa., including more than a handful of Obama supporters in T-shirts and waving signs, Bill Clinton told the crowd why his wife would make the best president.

And, in a move that's becoming more and more common, he favorably aligned his wife with the presumptive Republican nominee, John McCain.

"We now have a bipartisan majority in the U.S. Senate, bipartisan, to do something about global warming and do more buildings like this,” Clinton said, “because she and John McCain took reluctant Republicans all over the world and showed them how the planet was changing. She will work with anybody, go anywhere, do anything to move America forward.”

More Bill: "I'm always a little apprehensive when I get up to speak," he said. "I think, you know, people are gonna be kinda looking at me saying, 'I better discount about half of what he says. I mean, they're married, he's gotta say that or he can't go home tonight.'
 
After looking off stage, shrugging and raising his eyebrows, he concluded, "And you know, there could be some truth to that."

DiscussDiscuss (80 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Puerto Rico problem for Obama

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:58 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
The Obama campaign's hopes of winning the 6/1 Puerto Rico primary might have been dealt a serious blow with this news, as reported by the New York Times: "Aníbal S. Acevedo Vilá, the governor of Puerto Rico, has been charged with 19 criminal counts related to the financing of three political campaigns from 1999 to 2004, including conspiracy to violate federal campaign laws, wire fraud and illegally using campaign funds for his personal use, according to a federal indictment unsealed on Thursday."

Obama was endorsed by Acevedo Vila last month.


DiscussDiscuss (66 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

So happy together

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:36 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy
McCain
and Romney talked to reporters on the plane en route Denver, where McCain will be attending a fundraiser tonight. They took questions on their relationship, the Democrats' protracted fight and, of course, the veepstakes.

On the GOP nomination process
McCain: In all due respect and I think Governor Romney would agree with me is that our problem is we've accelerated the process to compressed it so much so that I'm not sure voters have as much opportunity to scrutinize the candidates. I've often said that it's interesting that Dwight David Eisenhower announced that he was running for president in 1952 in June of 1952. Look how we have accelerated -- I don't know, Mitt just went through the process.

Romney: The process was very good to you. I don't think I'd be terribly critical of it. And actually I feel that it was pretty good to me to too. I made a lot of progress and was pretty pleased I made the progress I did, but I'm sure that -- you're absolutely right senator, we all question a process that begins so early and I think in some respects detracts from the work of the president as he's carrying out his elected duties when you have a campaign going two full years before the election.

Romney: I think you'll find that the Republican Party -- like any great family -- comes together, will be strongly united behind our nominee, and I think that kind of unity is going to be one of the reasons he'll be successful in November.

Q: Does the Dems protracted primary benefit McCain?
Romney: I personally feel that in the final analysis, all of the to and fro of a campaign is brushed aside in the mind of the voters as they think about what is going to be best for their future, how will their families be raised, will there be peace on the planet, will we have a clean environment. These are the issues that will be the deciding factors in people's minds, and in the interim there's all the give and take of the politics of the day, but that really, I think, increasingly vanishes as people look at the differences in perspectives and policies of those running for president.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (22 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Rice as VP?

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:53 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Libby Leist
Soon after word leaked that Secretary Rice spoke in a closed session to Grover Norquist's Amercians for Tax Reform yesterday morning in Washington, the blogosphere began to speculate that Rice must be floating the idea of running on a ticket with John McCain

But, Rice's spokesman laughed it off today insisting that her talk to Norquist's group was all about U.S. foreign policy and Rice herself dismissed the idea last month when asked at a press conference if she would consider running as Vice President (see below)

All signs out of the State Department are that Rice's immediate plan is to head back to California, teach at Stanford and write a book.

Feb. 22, 2008:
Q There have been several articles written about "Condoleezza Rice for vice president." And some have called this a Republican dream team with you on the ticket. If asked, would you be willing to consider accepting that?

RICE: I've said all along what I'm going to do. You can all come and visit me in California. (Chuckles.)

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (40 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Chelsea misspeaks on Bush travel

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:02 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Matthew Berger
BENSALEM, Pa. -- Chelsea Clinton mistakenly said President Bush had not toured the Middle East as president before arriving there earlier this year.

Speaking at a retirement community outside of Philadelphia, the former first daughter suggested Bush had not been as engaged in the Middle East as previous Commanders-In-Chief, comparing his work to President Clinton’s in Northern Ireland.

“President Bush was in the Middle East last month, and its great that he was there, but that was his first trip there as president,” she said at the Wood River Village Assisted Living Center. “He’d visited our men in northern Iraq before but he’d never been to Israel; he’d never been to Jordan, he’d never been to Saudi Arabia or Egypt; he just hadn’t been.”

Bush in fact traveled to Egypt, Jordan and Qatar in 2003, and was in Jordan again in 2006. His trip in January 2008 was his first to Israel.

She spoke for more than an hour at the retirement home, addressing a wide range of issues, including healthcare, immigration and stem cell research.

Chelsea Clinton is making her first independent appearances since being asked earlier this week about the Monica Lewinsky scandal at a college town hall meeting. She will attend several events in the Philadelphia area Thursday and will speak in Allentown and Bethlehem on Friday.

*** UPDATE *** She just made the same comments about President Bush's Middle East travel while speaking at West Chester University.

DiscussDiscuss (150 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The brand called Obama

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:58 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
In next month's Fast Company, Ellen McGirt examines the Obama campaign as an emerging successful business model. McGirt both investigates how Obama’s campaign approach challenges both conventional political assumptions and conventional business assumptions and also challenges “any forward-looking business” to examine the campaign’s successes “from marketing strategies and leadership styles to the future of the American workplace.”

McGirt writes that Obama’s ability to connect with and mobilize the 18 to 29 age group through new media and online social networks acts as a base for his success. On a personal level, the presidential hopeful uses a Web cam to keep in touch with his wife and daughters while on the road. And on the campaign level, he capitalizes both on his own Web site, which allows supporters to create their own content and interact with one another, and in external content including viral videos created by supporters such as Obama Girl (though she hasn’t said she’s voting for him necessarily) and the Black Eyed Peas' Will.i.am.

While several people McGirt interviewed pointed out the difficulty in controlling the message from so many external sources, McGirt also writes the Obama campaign oversees the content posted on its Web site and responds to posts on other sites. The overwhelming success of Obama's online strategies, with credit due to outside aid, shows in his ability to convert Web hits into donations.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (25 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Another letter to Pelosi...

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:39 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Mike Viqueira
A Democratic source in Washington provides the following letter from a major Democratic donor as evidence that yesterday's "shakedown" letter to Speaker Pelosi is having an effect antithetical to its intention.

Leslie Walker Burlock of San Francisco writes yesterday to Nancy Pelosi pledging the max $28,000 to the DCCC. The Dem source says Ms. Burlock wrote after learning of the letter from the group of heavy hitters, a move that Burlock disagreed with.

I spoke with Ms. Burlock by phone. She says that yes, she agrees with Nancy Pelosi's stance on superdelegates, and that yes, she is an Obama supporter. But she demurred when asked several different ways whether or not her pledge comes as a rebuttal to the letter from the others. She didn't deny it, however.

P.S. - Ms. Burlock says she hasn't yet sent the dough.

The letter is below:

*** UPDATE *** MoveOn.org has also joined in with a letter to supporters

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (40 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Dem challengers' Iraq plan

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:25 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC’s Lindsey Pritzlaff
One criticism of Democrats in past elections is that they have railed against President Bush on Iraq without having a plan of their own. But 38 Democratic House challengers along with four Senate contenders have decided to run on a common platform outlining a strategy of withdrawal from Iraq.
 
Several of these candidates held a conference call today to discuss what they call, “A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq.” The plan was introduced about a week and a half ago, after six months of preparation. The plan combines existing legislation in Congress, packaged by Darcy Burner, a candidate for Washington’s eighth congressional district, with assistance from national security experts and retired generals.
 
“This plan offers a path out of Iraq. This administration has built a parking lot to keep us there,” said Eric Massa, who is running in New York’s 29th district. Massa added that much of the American public falsely believes that their only choices are between cutting and running and staying forever. 
 
“Over the course of running for office, the first question I was being asked was not, ‘Are you going to end the War?’ but, how to end the war in Iraq,” Burner said, adding the plan “articulates what a responsible end looks like.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Two killed in Iraq green zone

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:52 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Libby Leist
The State Department confirms that two U.S. citizens have died in Iraq this week from indirect fire by rocket and mortar attacks in the Green Zone.

The first person, a contractor for the US Army, died on Monday, March 24, and this afternoon, we have confirmation that another U.S. citizen has died from the latest round of fire.

The State Department says of this latest death "no further details, pending notification of next of kin."

*** UPDATE *** The Iraqi government has ordered a full (24 hours per day) curfew for Baghdad through Sunday. While curfews have been the norm over the past three years, this is the first curfew in Baghdad since mid-January.

DiscussDiscuss (57 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton hits McCain on job training

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Hillary Clinton hit Republican rival John McCain on the economy again today with a return to her "3 am" phone call analogy. The senator said it was time to "level the playing field for the middle class" and argued McCain would ignore the ringing phone in an economic crisis.

"Sometimes the phone rings at 3 am in the White House, and it's an economic crisis,” she said. “And we need president who is ready and willing and able to answer that call. I read the speech that Sen. McCain gave the other day, which set forth his plan which does virtually nothing to ease the credit crisis or the housing crisis. It seems like if the phone were ringing he would just let it ring and ring and ring.”

Clinton called the Arizona senator “a friend,” but noted he had admitted that he did not know much about economics. She said he would rather ignore the credit and mortgage crises facing Americans instead of solving them.

"I think we've had enough of a president who didn't know enough about economics," she said. "I don't think we can afford four more years of that kind of inaction."

Earlier this week, Clinton compared McCain to Depression-era President Herbert Hoover for saying the government should not bail out or reward banks or small borrowers who "act irresponsibly."

*** UPDATE *** The RNC sends this along: “Obama and Clinton’s economic plans are what you expect from two senators who think that big government is the solution for just about every problem. Obama and Clinton’s plans for more taxes, spending and regulations will lead to fewer homeowners and jobs. Instead of misrepresenting and attacking McCain’s proposals, Obama and Clinton should explain why they voted earlier this month to raise taxes on Americans earning as little as $31,850.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (56 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's economic address

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:11 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
NEW YORK -- Obama called for an overhaul of the nation's regulatory system today, arguing that "what was bad for Main Street was bad for Wall Street," and that a "loss of the sense of shared prosperity" had caused the current economic crisis.

"Pain trickled up," Obama said of how the increased rate of home foreclosures among individual homeowners had caused a downturn in the market as a whole.

Providing a historical rationale for increased government oversight of financial markets, Obama argued that the American economy had prospered and sustained itself because government had "guided the market's invisible hand with a higher principle."

VIDEO: Obama delivers an economic speech in New York, proposing an additional economic stimulus package and relief for homeowners.

He called for six principles for greater regulation and modernization of the nation's economic institutions, including:
(1) Government oversight for any entity that borrows from the federal government;
(2) An overall reform of the regulations governing financial institutions;
(3) Streamlining the nation's regulatory institutions;
(4) Regulations should be applied to what an organization does rather than what it is (e.g. financial regulations regarding sub-prime loans only applied to banks, allowing mortgage brokers to issue these loans without oversight);
(5) The SEC actively investigating market manipulation;
(6) And the creation of a financial oversight commission that identifies risks to the nation's financial system.

In calling for the oversight, Obama made a populist appeal.

"If we can extend a hand to banks on Wall Street, we can extend a hand to Americans who are struggling," he said, referring to the Fed's recent bailout of Bear Stearns. He also said that ordinary Americans had experienced the effects of a recession for the past several years and said that this was the only period in American history where incomes had not grown along with corporate profits.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (68 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

What 'oversample' means

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:56 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Hart/McInturff, the group that conducts the NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll, explains what "oversample" means.

TO: NBC News And The Wall Street Journal
FROM: Hart/McInturff
DATE: March 27, 2008
RE: Sample For March 24-25 Survey

As you know, the sample for the March 24-25 poll on race included an “oversample” of 100 African American voters. There has been some confusion as to exactly how these extra interviews were integrated into the survey; we hope this memorandum will clear up any misconceptions.

The main sample for the survey was a cross section of 700 registered voters nationally. As is the case with all of our usual polls, this sample is statistically representative of voters across the country, accurately reflecting the gender, age, educational, geographical, and racial makeup of the electorate. The column in the topline document labeled “All Voters”, as well as nearly all of the subgroups listed in the survey crosstabs, are among these cross section of 700. Eleven percent (11%) of these interviews -- or 77 interviews -- were with African Americans, which accurately reflects African Americans’ proportion of the electorate. Thus, African Americans are NOT over-represented in our national sample.

In addition to this national cross section, we interviewed an extra 100 African Americans to analyze the opinions of this group with a greater degree of statistical reliability. We combined these 100 only with the 77 African Americans that naturally fell into our national sample, for a total of 177 interviews with African Americans; these extra interviews were not combined with the full national sample of 700. The column in the topline document labeled “African Americans” shows the responses of these 177 respondents, as do the subgroups in the crosstabs for African Americans, African-American men, and African-American women.

The table below shows the margins of error for the three groups whose responses are shown in the topline document:

National cross section of voters: 700 interviews, +/- 3.7%
White voters: 520 interviews, +/- 4.3%
African-American voters: 177 interviews, +/- 7.4%

DiscussDiscuss (30 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton v. Obama on economy

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:21 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Obama and Clinton both delivered major addresses on the economy today. After Obama's speech, the Clinton campaign criticized it in an e-mail to the media:

“Presidents have to do more than announce principles," writes Clinton policy director Neera Tanden in the statement. "They have to solve problems. At a time of crisis in our financial markets, Senator Obama announced a series of broad, vague principles, while offering no new concrete solutions to provide Americans with greater confidence in the market or keep them in their homes.  The contrast could not be clearer -- on Monday, Senator Clinton announced a detailed, specific plan to address the housing and credit crisis.  On Tuesday, Senator McCain announced that he had no plan.  And today, Senator Obama offered just words.”

Obama spokesman Bill Burton responded this way: “We’ve all seen that the Clinton campaign never lets the facts get in the way of a good story, but they know full well that Barack Obama has offered thoughtful, detailed proposals to solve the housing crisis, one of which the New York Times just called the best idea from any candidate in the race. Senator Clinton’s new proposal this week amounted to calling for a meeting, so it’s pretty obvious that her latest kitchen sink attack is nothing more than just politics."

DiscussDiscuss (76 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Indicted PR gov, an Obama super

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:09 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Pete Williams
NBC's Chris Donovan points out that Puerto Rico's governor, Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, who was indicted today and charged with election law violations, is a Democratic party superdelegate who has endorsed Obama.

Gov. Acevedo Vilá and 12 of his supporters are accused of getting Puerto Rico businessmen to make illegal, unreported contributions to pay off debts from previous campaigns -- debts he never reported, another potential violation.

DiscussDiscuss (53 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain's preemptive strike

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:24 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
We'll have more on Obama's and Clinton's economic speeches later today, but below is McCain's preemptive attack, sent out earlier. Notice, the campaign includes both Obama AND Clinton this time.

By the way, intriguing stuff when Obama took the podium after NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg introduced him. Obama was effusive in his praise for Bloomberg, but said the reason he bought breakfast that morning is because he expects "payback." "I'm no dummy," Obama said, adding, "There are a lot of good steakhouses in New York." METAPHOR ALERT? By payback does he just mean a steak?

Also, anyone else notice Obama used the "R" word. "As most experts know, our economy is in a recession," Obama said.

That's been the subject of debate. The definition of a recession, as CNBC's Maria Bartiromo pointed out on Meet the Press this past Sunday, is two consecutive quarters of negative growth. That hasn't happened yet, and whatever it's labeled, everyone agrees the economy is at least in a slowdown or downturn.

Here's McCain's criticism/pre-emptive reaction to Clinton and Obama's speeches:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (64 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton to talk jobs, hit McCain

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:12 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
Here are excerpts from Hillary Clinton's speech in North Carolina today where she'll hit McCain and talk about job training.

Of course, the speech as given could include slightly different language, but this gives us at least some indication of where she's heading with her criticism:

Sometimes the phone rings at 3am in the White House and it’s an economic crisis. And we need a president who is ready and willing to answer that call. But I read Senator McCain's plan which does virtually nothing to ease the credit crisis or the housing crisis. The phone is ringing and he would just let it ring and ring.

Senator McCain is a friend of mine but he said himself, “The issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should.” He’d rather ignore the credit crisis and mortgage crisis -- or blame middle class families instead of offering solutions on their behalf.

We've had enough of a president who didn’t know enough about economics, and didn’t do enough for the middle class. I don't think we can afford four more years. I believe we have to answer the call and act aggressively to deal with the housing and credit crises. That’s the kind of president we need after eight years of George Bush.

While we are fighting to create jobs, and keep them here in America, today I’m announcing that I will commit $2.5 billion each year to help workers train for new jobs and improve their skills for their existing jobs as well.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (65 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain and Romney, together again

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:58 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
McCain will host a $1,000 a plate fundraiser in Salt Lake City today with Mitt Romney, the Salt Lake Tribune reports. Romney will then travel with the McCain campaign to Denver. 

"Romney, who dropped out of the race after poor showings in the primaries, received nearly 90 percent of the Utah GOP vote on Feb. 5, while McCain had just 5 percent," the Tribune writes. "Romney is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as are more than 60 percent of the state's residents.
   
"While McCain raised about $183,000 from Utahns since January 2007, Romney raised millions. Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., who has been the subject of media speculation as a possible McCain running mate, will be in attendance, organizers said." 

DiscussDiscuss (35 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First Thoughts: Myth buster

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:55 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Domenico Montanaro
*** Myth buster: Pollster Peter Hart calls the NBC/WSJ poll a “myth buster” survey; it really breaks down a lot of the myths we've been hearing over the last week like: (1) that the Wright controversy was the beginning of the end for the Obama campaign -- certainly not the case, but there’s no telling how much more Wright stuff comes out; (2) It was surprising how few people knew who Wright was (about half). People who followed story, though, were really disturbed (55%); (3) The premise that the Clinton campaign would turn out to be a stronger campaign or stronger among independents. (4) That the bar facing a black candidate would be higher than for a woman or a person over 70; There's a bar, but not higher; (5) That somehow this Wright story is over. If you look at it overall numbers, you can be misled. Among 29% of ALL voters, they need more answers from Obama. They have hesitations and uncertainties; they want to know, “Is he safe?” -- both in the sense of credentials/experience but also in terms of life story. The Wright controversy, the poll indicates, has taken a bit of the shine off Obama, brought him out of the stratosphere, notes pollster Bill McInturff. Clinton also faces a similar amount of uncertainties, but among a different group of people.
 
*** Not the one you’d think: But the poll didn’t indicate the past couple of weeks’ news hurt Obama the most; it was Clinton (sniper fire?). She’s sporting the lowest personal ratings of the campaign. Her 37% positive rating is the lowest the NBC/WSJ poll has recorded since March 2001, two months after she was elected to the U.S. Senate from New York. As for the damage this controversy did or didn't do to Obama, it's a mixed bag. Yes, Obama saw some of his numbers go down slightly among certain voting groups, most notably Republicans. But he's still much more competitive with independent voters when matched up against John McCain than Hillary Clinton is. And he still sports a net-positive personal rating of 49-32, which is down only slightly from two weeks ago, when it was 51-28. Again, the biggest shift in those negative numbers was among Republicans. 

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd explains the new NBC News/WSJ poll, saying Obama maintained a good perception among voters, despite the Wright controversy.
 
*** McCain-ocrats? For the second poll in a row, more than 20% of Clinton and Obama supporters say they would support McCain when he's matched up against the other Democrat. There is clearly some hardening of feelings among some of the most core supporters of both Democrats, though it may be Obama voters, who are bitterer in the long run.
 
*** Carolina on my mind: By the way, Clinton also talks economy again today, and does it in North Carolina. With her foray into NC and Bill’s all-out campaigning in a bunch of other post-PA states, all signs are pointing to this going on at least through the last contests in June. But keep a particular eye on Clinton in Carolina. This is becoming more and more of a must-win state; A combination of a 15-20 point win in Pennsylvania and an upset in the Tar Heel state would shake up this race in the same way Obama's 11-contest win streak in February did.
 
*** Shakedown: Why didn't the Clinton campaign get superdelegates to sign on to that letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi rather than donors? Doesn't this letter coming only from major donors make it look like a threat or a shakedown? Wouldn't this letter coming from fellow superdelegates have had more impact? One Dem operative who doesn't have a horse in this fight reminds us: "Members of Congress -- who are superdelegates -- make up the DCCC. Threatening the DCCC is essentially threatening the very superdelegates HRC's trying to court. The HRC donor letter will just push undeclared superdelegates in Congress leaning toward Obama to endorse him sooner. It also reinforces the notion that the Clintons will destroy the party to win the WH. I just don't get it."
 
*** Supers turned off: A handful of undecided and pledged superdelegates come forward to tell NBC/NJ’s Matthew Berger that her campaign's tactics in recent weeks are doing more harm than good
 
*** A fall preview: Those who love the Veepstakes will enjoy today's Obama speech, not for the substance but for the person who will introduce him: Michael Bloomberg. While the mayor says he's not endorsing anyone (yet?), this is the second time Bloomberg has given Obama a high profile photo-op (remember the meeting at that diner a few months back?). As for Obama's economic speech, per the campaign, "Obama takes on special interests for housing/economic crisis; lays out principles for new regulatory framework." Obama, himself, previewed the speech on the plane yesterday. "I will be giving some, I will be outlining, my thoughts on the current state of the economy. How we got there and some very specific prescriptions, what helped trigger the financial crisis and the financial problems." But it will be the potential of Obama-Bloomberg that could be the most important take-away. In fact, considering that anti-Israel sentiments being expressed by the Rev. Wright in these newly circulating church bulletins (see Andrea Mitchell’s reporting on TODAY below in the Obama section). A fortunate thing for Obama is at least these church bulletins aren’t video. The idea of a Jewish running mate might end up making more and more sense for Obama as the summer wears on.
 
*** Hooked? Also, did McCain take the bait? Back from his vacation, Obama made a point of trying to shift the focus to him vs. McCain again. (No talk of Hillary, by the way.) Then the McCain camp releases a statement bashing Obama this morning before his speech, calling this election a “clear choice.” (Again, no mention of Hillary.)
 
*** Swing-state campaigning: McCain campaigns today in Colorado, a state particularly the Obama campaign has been selling as a potential Dem Red State pick up. We’ve already seen McCain in Michigan. How many Dems are thinking that the longer this Clinton-Obama contest goes on, the harder it is becoming for Democrats to campaign and make in-roads in those potential pick up states? The DNC tries to do its part, attacking McCain’s viability out West, including Colorado and even his home state, in a conference call today with state Democratic Party leaders from those two states and Utah and Nevada.
 
*** On the trail: Clinton makes three stops in North Carolina, including the economic address; McCain raises money in Salt Lake City and Denver, where he also will take questions from reporters; Obama speaks on the economy at Cooper Union in New York City; Bill Clinton hits the trail hard in Pennsylvania with five stops; and so does Chelsea with three of her own in PA.
 
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 26 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 40 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 222 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 299 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (63 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

NBC/WSJ poll: Is Obama safe choice?

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:51 AM by Domenico Montanaro

"As reassuring as the poll is for Sen. Obama, Mr. Hart and Mr. McInturff agreed that it did indicate that a substantial number of voters question whether the first-term senator would be a safe choice, or whether more needs to be known about him. Mr. McInturff said some voters are wondering, 'Do we know enough about this guy?' the Wall Street Journal writes.
 
"While the senator's support among Democrats is little changed, he did slip among conservatives and Republican voters, groups that had shown some attraction to Sen. Obama's message of changing partisan politics in Washington. 'I think the survey does indicate that this has taken a little of the patina off Sen. Obama,' Mr. McInturff said."

For more, click here.

DiscussDiscuss (35 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:43 AM by Domenico Montanaro

PENNSYLVANIA: 4/22 (158 delegates)
It looks like the Philly Dem Committee may stay out of the Dem primary and not endorse either candidate; that's good news for Obama as most of the Dem establishment in the state has been siding with Clinton. Of course, "For Clinton and Obama, a City Committee endorsement would probably carry little weight because swaying voters in a presidential race is difficult. The only practical advantage, political consultant Larry Ceisler said, might be logistical, in that the Democratic machinery might ‘help get people to the polls, make sure there is no trouble at the polls, and be the eyes and ears on the ground.’
 
“That is probably not enough to make either campaign press too hard for an endorsement, which goes well with the sentiment voiced this week by ward leaders."
 
Some other notes from NBC/NJ’s Matthew Berger: Rendell told the Clinton campaign to hold off on visiting Pittsburgh until they had garnered the endorsements of both Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato. His heavy campaigning for Clinton has angered some Republicans who say he isn’t spending enough time on state issues and Democrats who say he isn’t doing enough to elect Democrats to the state legislature. 
 
Pennsylvania is 30 percent Catholic, and Obama is planning small roundtable meetings with Catholic voters to focus on economy, jobs and healthcare issues, as well as play down the Rev. Jeremiah Wright issue. “Clinton backers Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week wrote a letter to Pennsylvania Catholics emphasizing her plans on health care, mortgage foreclosures and fuel costs.” 
 
NORTH CAROLINA: 5/6 (115 delegates)
Some notes from NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann: Today kicks off a three-day Clinton blitz that will see all three members of the former First Family in the Tar Heel State between now and Saturday. Today, Hillary Clinton hits Raleigh, Winston-Salem, and Fayetteville; tomorrow, Bill Clinton visits Greensboro and points west in a marathon five-stop day; and Saturday, Chelsea Clinton joins former senator John Edwards in addressing the state's Young Democrats organization. Gone are the days of local speculation that Hillary would be writing off North Carolina; reporters now are too busy Mapquesting the trip between Kannapolis and Salisbury and praying that they still have time to profile their third Republican gubernatorial candidate this week.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (22 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Going to Carolina...

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:39 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Clinton makes her first stop in NC today, a state that is becoming more and more of a must-win if she is to complete a comeback. NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones reports she will announce a new proposal to support job training, during a stop at a technical college in Raleigh, NC Thursday morning. The new plan would cost $12.5 billion over five years. The stop will be the first of a six-day tour through North Carolina, Indiana and Pennsylvania, where she'll focus on the economy, according to a briefing by her campaign staff.
 
The idea is to demonstrate Clinton's ability to be a steward of the economy and she will be highlighting state and local initiatives that she believes are working. The focus on job training and re-training, is something North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley has also pushed and Clinton argues the federal government should partner with state and local governments on these kinds of initiatives.
 
The plan would make job training available to displaced workers, provide new Pell grants for displaced workers who enroll in training and education programs to upgrade skills and support new on-the-job training programs. Her campaign said to expect more language today about John McCain and the economy.
 
Aides see North Carolina as an "uphill battle" but say it's also a place where they see opportunities.
 
"A group of prominent Hillary Clinton donors sent a letter to House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday asking her to retract her comments on superdelegates and stay out of the Democratic fight over their role in the presidential race. The 20 prominent Clinton supporters told Pelosi she should "clarify" recent statements to make it clear superdelegates -- nearly 800 party insiders and elected officials who are free to back any candidate -- could support the candidate they think would be the best nominee."
 
More: "Among the signees of the letter were prominent Democrats and Clinton supporters like Robert Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television; Bernard Schwartz, former chairman of Loral Space and Communications; and venture capitalist Steven Rattner. The signees reminded the House leader from California of their support for the party's House campaign committee and said ‘therefore’ she should ‘reflect in your comments a more open view’ about superdelegates.” 

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Foreign policy reactions

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:34 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Post on McCain's major foreign policy speech: "In his first extensive policy speech since securing the delegates needed to win the Republican presidential nomination, McCain delivered an impassioned argument that achieving democracy in Iraq is necessary for a peaceful world. ‘Those who argue that our goals in Iraq are unachievable are wrong, just as they were wrong a year ago when they declared the war already lost in Iraq,’ he said, without naming Democratic candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama. ‘Those who claim we should withdraw from Iraq in order to fight al-Qaeda more effectively elsewhere are making a dangerous mistake.’
 
“But even as McCain offered a defense of President Bush's current war policy, he outlined a sharp critique of the administration's dealings with foreign allies.”
 
L.A. Times lead: "McCain, carefully distancing himself from President Bush and seeking to sound a moderate tone, called Wednesday for stronger ties with allies and cautioned that American power "does not mean we can do whatever we want, whenever we want."
 
The upcoming issue of Time has an extensive profile of McCain the reformer and his relationship with lobbyists. From Michael Scherer's piece: "For most other senators, especially those lacking presidential ambitions, such untoward appearances would not raise much of an eyebrow. On any given day, thousands of lobbyists work their connections on Capitol Hill, hoping to obtain letters on their behalf or legislation in their favor. But for McCain, such questions become an issue of integrity. He is the one, after all, who regularly breaks the Senate's code of silence by alleging corruption by his peers. ‘Elected officials do act in particular ways in order to assist large soft-money donors,’ McCain wrote in a sworn statement from the 2002 Supreme Court case over his campaign-finance bill. ‘This skews and shapes the legislative process.’

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (18 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: More Wright; veep preview?

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:31 AM by Domenico Montanaro

NBC's Andrea Mitchell reported on TODAY, "And now -- even more controversy involving Reverend Wright. An Internet search reveals church bulletins over the past year with controversial 'pastor pages' from Wright. Some reprint anti-Israel writings from a range of people -- from Archbishop Desmond Tutu to an advisor to Elijah Muhammed and Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam to Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook.
 
"One of Marzook's columns, reprinted by the church from the Los Angeles Times, says: "Why should any Palestinian recognize the monstrous crimes carried out by Israel's founders and continued by its deformed modern Apartheid state?"
 
"Obama told the Jerusalem Post the church was 'outrageously wrong' to reprint the article, and he denounced Hamas.
 
"And Trumpet, a magazine run by Reverend Wright's daughters, quotes the pastor as saying: 'White supremacy is clearly in charge' in America. And slurring Italians' quote: 'garlic noses.' He also calls Jesus' crucifixion 'a public lynching Italian style.'"
 
"Still, Wright was praised Wednesday by the minister of the church the Clintons attended during their white house years.
 
"Well, I've heard Reverend Wright speak a number of times throughout the years," said the Rev. Dean Snyder, "and have the greatest respect for him as a leader."
 
Is this a Dem ticket preview? NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg is introducing Obama today for his speech on the economy. 

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (57 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The general election: MA state poll

Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:24 AM by Domenico Montanaro

After a week of taking a beating over the fact that a poll showed Clinton out-performing Obama against McCain in Mass., the Obama campaign now has its own blue-state electability argument. In a new Quinnipiac Univ. poll in Conn., Obama has a double-digit lead over McCain while Clinton only leads him by 3 points.

DiscussDiscuss (15 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

NBC-WSJ poll: New Clinton lows

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:30 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Chuck Todd
As expected, one of the two major Democratic candidates saw a downturn in the latest NBC/WSJ poll, but it's not the candidate that you think. Hillary Clinton is sporting the lowest personal ratings of the campaign. Moreover, her 37% positive rating is the lowest the NBC/WSJ poll has recorded since March 2001, two months after she was elected to the U.S. Senate from New York.

The poll was conducted Monday and Tuesday this week by Hart-McInturff and surveyed 700 registered voters, which gives the poll a margin of error of +/- 3.7%. In addition, we oversampled African-Americans in order to get a more reliable cross-tab on many of the questions we asked in this poll regarding Sen. Barack Obama's speech on race and overall response to last week's Rev. Jeremiah Wright dustup.

On that issue specifically, 32% of folks said he "sufficiently addressed the issue," while 26% of those folks believe he needs to address the Wright controversy further; 31% of voters surveyed did not see the speech or had no opinion. Interestingly, of those voters who said they saw the speech, 47% said Obama sufficiently addressed the Wright issue while 37% said he needs to address it further. Among whites, 45% were satisfied with Obama's explanation, 38% were not; Among blacks, 67% said the speech was sufficient while 25% want him to address it further.

Overall, 55% of voters told us that they were "disturbed" by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright videos that circulated so widely on cable TV and the Internet.

As for the damage this controversy did or didn't do to Obama, it's a mixed bag. Yes, Obama saw some of his numbers go down slightly among certain voting groups, most notably Republicans. But he's still much more competitive with independent voters when matched up against John McCain than Hillary Clinton. And he still sports a net-positive personal rating of 49-32, which is down only slightly from two weeks ago when it was 51-28. Again, the biggest shift in those negative numbers were among Republicans.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (99 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton tactics turn off some superdelegates

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:55 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Matthew E. Berger
At a time when Sen. Hillary Clinton is increasingly relying on superdelegates to vault her to the Democratic Party's nomination, a handful of undecided and pledged superdelegates are coming forward to say her campaign's tactics in recent weeks are doing more harm than good.
 
The Democratic Party insiders say they believe Clinton's direct attacks against Sen. Barack Obama in recent days are hurting the party and its chances in November, and also say it is showing a calculated, desperate-to-win side of Clinton that they dislike.
 
"In looking at the manner in which the candidates are campaigning, I think it would be best they focused their attention on the presumptive nominee and showed our party which one is better in campaigning against McCain," said Garry Shay, a California superdelegate, who announced his support for Clinton.
 
Unlike some in the party, these superdelegates said they do not believe Clinton should drop out of the race. They said they are committed to the democratic process, and want to allow the states still remaining to cast their ballots. But they acknowledged Obama is the likely nominee and suggested the personal attacks were only hurting the party and its viability.
 
The Clinton campaign has been actively wooing these delegates, believing a plurality represents the strongest, and increasingly the only, way for her to win the nomination. But one undeclared delegate, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the recent tactics are turning her and other superdelegates off.
 
"I don't think anybody's saying 'step aside,' but 'stop with the garbage' is what people want to say," the delegate said. "Just chill a little bit."
 
As activists committed to the party, they said, they have been impressed by Obama's ability to bring new Democrats into the fold, and they worry that Clinton is threatening that.
 
"We like the fact that there is a candidate that has won so many states overwhelmingly," the delegate said. "We're feeling her advisors are leading her in a path that diminishes her as well as him."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (90 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain proposes League of Democracies

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:01 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy
MONTEREY, Calif. -- In McCain’s first major policy address since locking up the GOP nomination this morning, his campaign did its best to make its candidate look presidential. Using two teleprompters on the wings of the podium, McCain delivered a 30-minute speech that showed how a potential McCain presidency would try to change the shape of U.S. foreign policy.
 
Two new ideas came out of McCain’s speech, both focusing on shoring up relations with the country’s democratic allies.
 
“We have to strengthen our global alliances as the core of a new global compact -- a League of Democracies -- that can harness the vast influence of the more than one hundred democratic nations around the world to advance our values and defend our shared interests,” McCain said, reading from prepared texts.

But during the question-and-answer portion of the event following his speech, McCain expanded on his “League of Democracies” proposal.

VIDEO: John McCain calls for the United States to work more respectfully with democratic allies and live up to its duties as a world leader.
 

“It’s not just [a commitment of] mine. President Sarkozy of France is talking about the same thing; Prime Minister Brown of England, Chancellor Merkel is another talking about the same thing,” McCain said in response to a question about containing an Iranian nuclear program, arguing that a coalition of democratic countries could be more effective in pressuring the Iranians to abandon their nuclear ambitions. CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (70 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama calls Wright issue a distraction

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 4:41 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
GREENSBORO, N.C. -- Obama defended his controversial former pastor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright today, on the heels of statements by Hillary Clinton that she would have left Wright's church had she been in Obama's place.
 
Obama invited the audience in Greensboro to come to Trinity United Church, the church Wright founded and where he preached for 30 years. Obama called it a "wonderful, welcoming church" that had a pastor who was "trying to teach a lesson connecting scripture to our daily lives and people struggle with illness and family and finances and all the things that people normally talk about."
 
Turning to Wright, Obama said his "former pastor said some objectionable things when I wasn't in church on those particular days, and I have condemned them out right."
 
But trying to contextualize Wright's comments, Obama added, "I do have to remind people though this is somebody who was preaching at least three sermons at least a week for 30 years. And so,  [sic] got boiled down; They found five or six of his most offensive statements, boiled that down to a … half-minute sound clip and just played it over and over again."
 
He said the clips spoke "to some of the racial divisions that we have in this country and tapped into those divisions. I hope people don't get distracted by this because as I said in my speech last week on Tuesday; we can't afford to be distracted."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (102 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

NH reaction; GOP strategy v. Clinton

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 3:15 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
A couple of other items from today...

Bill Clinton's comments that Democrats “let New Hampshire go out of turn,” and that they have a Democratic Secretary of State, is causing a mini stir in the Granite State.

The New Hampshire Union Leader: "Former New Hampshire Democratic Chairman Kathy Sullivan, a state Clinton campaign co-chair, said she believed that Bill Clinton was criticizing the DNC in his remarks, not New Hampshire.

"But the former president also appeared to imply in his statement that the DNC allowed the New Hampshire primary to be held earlier than scheduled in the DNC rules because Secretary of State Bill Gardner, who set the date of the New Hampshire primary as set out by state law, is a Democrat.

"Sullivan said Bill Clinton was mistaken to suggest that Gardner's party affiliation was in any way related to New Hampshire receiving a waiver from the DNC.

"Clinton campaign spokesman Kathleen Strand said, 'Hillary and Bill Clinton have been staunch and ardent supporters' of the first-in-the-nation primary in New Hampshire. 'That's indisputable.'

"She said the former president was not criticizing New Hampshire, but instead saying that 'just as New Hampshire voters had a voice, Michigan and Florida votes should have a voice' and that 'Obama should know better than anyone in this campaign that the campaign is not over until the last vote is counted. New Hampshire made that point to him pretty clearly.'"

This article from Salon is an interesting read. It lays out what the Republican strategy would be for a Nominee Clinton:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (68 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama hits McCain on economics

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:33 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
GREENSBORO, NC -- Playing off Bush's ownership society theme from 2004, Obama said McCain, like Bush, was offering an "on your own" prescription for dealing with a rapidly sinking economy.

"According to John McCain, he said the best for us to address the fact that millions of Americans are losing their homes is to just sit back and watch it happen," Obama said. "In his entire speech yesterday, he offered not one policy, not one idea, not one bit of relief for the nearly 35,000 North Carolinians who were forced to foreclose on their dream in the last few months. Not one, not one single idea or a single policy prescription."

VIDEO: Barack Obama criticizes John McCain's speech on the economy, likening his policy to that of President Bush.

Pointing a finger at the president, Obama said that Bush had led the country down this road in a similar manner for the past eight years.

"It's the idea that the government has no rule at all in solving the challenges facing working families," Obama said. "That all we can do is hand out tax breaks to the wealthiest people and let the chips fall where they may. George Bush called this the ownership society, but he really meant is, 'You’re On Your Own Society.'"

"If you lose your job, you're on your own," Obama chanted. "If you're a child in poverty, pull yourself up by your bootstraps; you're on your own. If you were lured in by deceptive mortgage practices you're on your own."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (91 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: 'Saddle up'

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli
PARKERSBURG, W.V. -- Bill Clinton kicked off a day of campaigning here by making a personal appeal to voters, saying Hillary's success depends on "real" people like those who came to see him. And as the rhetoric heats up between the Democratic campaigns, Bill Clinton offered this message: "Saddle up."

"If a politician doesn't wanna get beat up, he shouldn't run for office," he said. "If a politician doesn't wanna get beat up, he shouldn't run for office. If a football player doesn't want to get tackled or want the risk of an a occasional clip he shouldn't put the pads on."

Clinton then alluded to the resignations and calls for resignations that have been traded back and forth between the campaigns.

"I don't think any of these people oughta be asked to resign," he said. "All these guys that say bad things about any other campaign, they say, 'Should they resign?' My answer is no; they're repeating party line. They oughta stay right where they are. Let's just saddle up and have an argument. What's the matter with that? That's what America's about, right?"

And while some are "moaning and groaning," he said there are larger issues to gripe about. "None of these politicians are gonna have anything like the tough time half the people in this audience have already had for the last seven years," he said to applause. "This is about you. Don't you let anybody take this election away from you."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (79 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Power speaks out again

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:51 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Samantha Power was at the Columbia University School of Law where she was plugging her book. Here's part of Huffington Post's write up:

"Power labeled herself 'amazed' that Clinton had tried to get so much 'political mileage' from comments Power made, in which she suggested that the next commander-in-chief would consider conditions on the ground when implementing his or her Iraq withdrawal plan.

" 'What I was saying is that you have to take into account what the generals on the ground are telling you,' Power told the room of several hundred undergraduate and graduate students. 'Take for example that 3 am phone call [from Clinton's campaign commercial]... She is not going to answer the phone and play a voicemail she recorded in 2007. That is crazy. She is going to judge the situation in 2009. Of course she is going to take into account what the generals have to say about the Iraq situation and what they are saying on the ground.'"

Here are some other interesting nuggets toward the end of the piece:
"Power called Obama's willingness to meet, without preconditions, world leaders with whom America did not always see eye-to-eye, one of the turning points of the Democratic primary: 'I can tell you about the conference call the day [after Obama made the proclamation],' she recalled. 'People were like, 'Did you need to say that?' And he was like 'yeah, definitely.''"

"She emphasized that, unlike President Bush, Obama would put greater focus on the general welfare of the Iraqi people (looking at population displacements, health conditions, economic insecurities), when considering U.S. policy in that country. She also drew a picture of an Obama administration that was filled with different viewpoints and congenial debate.

"And, to the delight of many in the crowd, she even hinted that she could be part of that hypothetical cabinet. 'Because of the kind of campaign that Senator Obama has run,' Power said, 'it seemed appropriate for someone of my Irish temper to step aside, at least for a while. We will see what happens there.'"

DiscussDiscuss (58 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton team explains Wright decision

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:49 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Here's the Clinton team's explanation of the candidate's decision to weigh in on the Wright controversy...
 
To: Interested Parties
From: The Clinton Campaign
Date: March 26, 2008
RE: The Obama Record: Just Words

Yesterday, a Pennsylvania editorial board asked Sen. Clinton how she would have "responded if [her] pastor had said some of the things that Rev. Wright said?"  In response, she said Rev. Wright would not have been her pastor, an honest view shared by many Americans.

The Obama campaign's response?  Attack Sen. Clinton and accuse her of trying to divert attention from the Bosnia trip story and her record of foreign policy experience.  

Sen. Clinton’s response was sincere.  The Obama attack was disingenuous. CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Wright here, right now

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:11 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Domenico Montanaro
 *** Wright here, right now: There's nothing that bothers some inside the Clinton campaign more than the constant reading in between the lines of the senator's motivations when she chooses to answer a specific question. But this has been a constant issue for Clinton ever since she decided to follow in her husband's footsteps. For the first time, Clinton decided to weigh in on the Wright controversy, saying he would not have been her pastor. But for more than a week, Clinton had declined to address it and was even complimentary of Obama’s speech on race last week. She certainly had ample opportunity to be critical on this issue, so why now? In the shadow of the Bosnia sniper “misstatement,” (her newest iteration is that she was “sleep deprived”) this certainly seems like an attempt to change the subject and take the spotlight off her. After all, whenever there has been a heavy focus on one of these candidates, the other has benefited. This week, so far, the spotlight has been on Clinton. If you missed all three evening newscasts, it's clear Clinton had one of the worst earned media days in a few months. By the way, why did the campaign decide to sit down with Richard Mellon Scaife's newspaper ed board? We know that Bill Clinton and Scaife broke bread and apparently called a truce, but wow.
 
*** Nothing's changed; no one's voted and yet...: What's with all this, it's time for Clinton to drop out talk? Clinton, for the first time herself, acknowledged the chatter in a very newsy press avail yesterday. The campaign is in full pushback mode on this very issue as they seem to worry that the whispers of party elders and undecided SuperDelegates is actually getting loud. The campaign released a "myth-fact" white paper addressing what they claim is the false idea that they have no mathematical chance. And Bill Clinton made the focus of his Kentucky stumping pushing back on this idea HRC is done. As we noted yesterday, she does have a mathematical chance, but her chances rest largely on the shoulders of these undecided SuperDelegates, some of whom are talking to the press about their own handwringing. But for those calling for Clinton to get out, ask yourself, why? She does have a chance. Sure it's somewhat of a longshot, but it's not so improbable that the Obama campaign is ignoring her in the same way McCain ignored Huckabee. And remember their own personal experience. Bill Clinton, for instance, knows firsthand had one of the major Democratic candidates in '92 (say Tsongas or Kerrey) decided to stay in for the long haul, that candidate just might have stolen the nomination away from Clinton when he was limping to the nomination in April and May struggling to dispatch semi-gadfly Jerry Brown. As the Maryland (or is it Virginia lottery) ad campaign used to say, "you can't win if you don't play."

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd talks about Hillary Clinton's decision to weigh in on the Wright controversy and continued calls for her to get out of the race for the sake of the Democratic Party.
 
*** ‘Hell to Pay’: There seems to be a want by the Democratic Party to establish a critical mass and get this over with. See Maria Cantwell, Phil Bredesen and Harry Reid. Cantwell yesterday implied the winner of the pledged delegates would have the strongest claim to the nomination when the primaries are finished. Meanwhile, check out Bredesen’s “hell to pay” comment and Reid tersely saying the nomination WILL be wrapped up before convention.
 
*** While you were gone: Obama’s back on the trail (in 5/6 North Carolina), but how will he choose to get back in the game? It looks like by picking a fight with McCain. Per the campaign, Obama in his speech today on the economy “will focus on Senator McCain's speech on the housing crisis that offered no new ideas and no relief for Americans facing foreclosure,” Obama’s campaign spokesman Bill Burton writes. “Senator Obama will make clear that Americans can't afford four more years of Bush economics that lets Wall Street thrive as Main Street struggles.” Obviously, this is a renewed attempt by the campaign to jump-start the inevitability memo of a McCain-Obama general. Let's see if the McCain campaign bites on this one.
 
*** The tax man cometh: After two days of the Clinton campaign criticizing Obama in conference calls for not releasing tax returns prior to 2006 (even though his campaign had been criticizing Clinton on transparency, for not releasing even her 2007 tax returns -- something Obama had done), the Obama campaign released all of Obama’s back to 2000. And made them available on the Web. Camp Clinton has said the Clintons would release theirs very soon, perhaps in a week or so. Among the things the press grabbed on to with Obama's tax returns: the jump in charitable contributions (including money he gave to Rev. Wright's church) and the sharp rise in income for Michelle Obama as Barack rose through the ranks. Beyond that, though, no major landmines appear to be in these returns. Though we do wonder why the campaign didn't release tax returns going back to his first year in elective office ('96). It's a small opening the Obama folks have given to the Clinton campaign to harp on. 
 
*** The real Dream Ticket? Reports NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann, Mike Gravel said in a statement, "Today, I am announcing my plan to join the Libertarian Party, because the Democratic Party no longer represents my vision for our great country." Is the real ’08 Dream Ticket some version of Paul-Gravel?
 
*** Coming later today: A special NBC/WSJ poll on race and the fallout in the pres. race following the Rev. Wright controversy and Obama's historic speech on race relations.
 
*** On The Trail: Clinton participates in an event in DC with her daughter Chelsea; McCain holds two more fundraisers in California and speaks to the LA World Affairs Council; Obama’s back from vacation with a town hall in Greensboro, NC; and Bill Clinton makes three stops in West Virginia, a May 13 primary state where Clinton is favored.
 
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 27 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 41 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 223 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 300 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: Is the party moving?

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:06 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Phil Bredesen, the two-term governor of Tennessee who is uncommitted to either Clinton or Obama, “joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in warning that superdelegates should not overturn the outcome from primaries and caucuses,” Politico reports. “If Obama were denied the nomination by Democratic insiders after winning the party’s popular vote, Bredesen said, ‘There would be hell to pay in the party for a long time to come.’” 
 
And check out this exchange with Sen. Maj. Leader Harry Reid in the Las Vegas Journal-Review: “Reid said he remains convinced the nominee will be decided well before the August national convention. He wore a serene and mysterious smile….
 
Question: Do you still think the Democratic race can be resolved before the convention?
Reid: Easy.
Q: How is that?
Reid: It will be done.
Q: It just will?
Reid: Yep.
Q: Magically?
Reid: No, it will be done. I had a conversation with Governor Dean (Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean) today. Things are being done.
 
On Michigan and Florida, Reid said, "Michigan and Florida wouldn't play by the rules. They're not my rules. They're not the caucus' rules. They're DNC rules. They broke the rules. Michigan and Florida delegates are going to be seated. They're going to be a part of the convention. It's a question of whether anything can be worked out to change this prior to the 2,025. They're the ones causing all the problems. No one else did. And so they will be seated. They're big states. They represent 29 million people. We want to make sure their delegates are part of the convention that takes place in Denver."
 
PENNSYLVANIA: 4/22 (158 delegates)
Some PA notes, per NBC/NJ’s Matthew Berger:
The economy is the focus of Clinton’s first 30-second ads in Pennsylvania. It is believed her ad buy is significantly less than Obama’s and focuses primarily in the Philadelphia media market. She spent about $600,000, Obama spent close to $1.6 million. 

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Bill as J.R.?

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:04 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Bill Clinton, campaigning in Kentucky, compared the Dem primary to an episode of the '80s prime-time soap opera, Dallas. "This is the darnedest election I ever saw, isn't it? It seems like a long-running episode of Dallas or something, it's like a saga, you know?"
 
OK, so clearly Bill is J.R., right? Is Hillary SueEllen? Is Obama, Bobby or is he Cliff Barnes? Sorry, we couldn't help ourselves.
 
On a more serious note, NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli reports Bill Clinton pushed back against those trying to nudge his wife out of the race. "Now there's a new tactic," he said. "It's to say, 'Oh what a bad sport you are for wanting to let the people of Kentucky and West Virginia and Oregon and North Carolina and Pennsylvania vote. You could get ahead in the popular vote, but you're gonna be outspent. And why don't you just pack it in and while we're at it, we're gonna disenfranchise the people in Florida and Michigan, even if it costs us the general election.’”
 
NYT's MoDowd believes HRC has now set her sights on the VP slot. "One Hillary pal said she wouldn’t want to go back to a Senate full of lawmakers who’d abandoned her for Obama. And even if she could get to be majority leader, would it be much fun working with Nancy Pelosi, whose distaste for the Clintons has led her to subtly maneuver for Obama?
 
“Maybe The Terminator is thinking: if she could just get her pump in the door. Dick Cheney, after all, was able to run the White House and the world from the vice president’s residence, calling every shot while serving under a less experienced and younger president. And Observatory Circle is just up the street from where Hillary now lives." 
 
The Clinton campaign is pushing back HARD on this idea that she doesn't have a chance. In a release last night, the campaign released three myths, two of which, had to do with her chances for the nomination:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (56 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: GOP and the economy

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:01 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The New York Times covers McCain's speech on the mortgage/housing issue and notes he drew a "sharp distinction" from his Dem foes. He "warned Tuesday against vigorous government action to solve the deepening mortgage crisis and the market turmoil it has caused, saying that ‘it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.’” More: "McCain has often addressed the mortgage crisis in general terms on the campaign trail, but in Tuesday’s remarks he offered a more comprehensive look at the challenge facing the nation -- and the roots of the problem. He blamed a profusion of complicated and recently devised financial instruments ‘that weren’t particularly well understood by even the most sophisticated banks, lenders and hedge funds.’
 
“Mr. McCain appeared to be trying to confront questions about his dexterity in dealing with the economy, a subject that he has admitted is not his strongest suit. But his remarks drew a quick, pointed rebuke from Mrs. Clinton, who criticized Mr. McCain’s hands-off, market-oriented approach, saying it would lead to ‘a downward spiral that would cause tremendous economic pain and loss’ for Americans." 
 
McCain's "remarks came on a busy campaign swing through the Los Angeles area, where he picked up the endorsement of former First Lady Nancy Reagan. McCain also attended a fundraiser hosted by former Univision Chairman A. Jerrold Perenchio and his wife, Margaret.
 
“Reagan greeted McCain in the late afternoon during a brief meeting in front of her Bel-Air home. In a prepared statement, she called McCain ‘a good friend for over 30 years.’ She said she and her husband got to know McCain after his 5 1/2 -year imprisonment in North Vietnam, and ‘were impressed by the courage he had shown.’ ‘I believe John's record and experience have prepared him well to be our next president,’ her statement added.
 
“Reagan was not expected to speak to reporters, but she spoke up when McCain was asked about the timing of the endorsement. ‘Ronnie and I always waited until everything was decided, and then we endorsed. Well, obviously this is the nominee of the party,’ she said, looking up at McCain and patting his arm several times."
 
The Boston Globe notes, "McCain's longtime effort to crack down on tobacco is being put to a new test. Within weeks, the Senate is expected to vote on legislation to allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco. McCain agreed months ago to cosponsor the current bill with Senator Edward M. Kennedy, but McCain's policy adviser said the senator won't commit to voting for it until he sees the final legislation.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: The tax man

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:58 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Post follows the NYT on doing a story about Obama's liberalism. "As Obama heads into the final presidential primaries, Sen. John McCain and other Republicans have already started to brand him a standard-order left-winger, ‘a down-the-line liberal,’ as McCain strategist Charles R. Black Jr. put it, in a long line of Democratic White House hopefuls.
 
“Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign has also started slapping the L-word on Obama, warning that his appeal among moderate voters will diminish as they become more aware of liberal positions he took in the past, such as calling for single-payer health care and an end to the U.S. embargo against Cuba. ‘The evidence is that the more [voters] have been learning about him, the more his coalition has been shrinking,’ Clinton strategist Mark Penn said.
 
“The double-barreled attack has presented Democratic voters with some persistent questions about Obama: Just how liberal is he? And even if he truly is a new kind of candidate, can he avoid being pigeonholed with an old label under sustained assault?"
 
Tomorrow, Obama is giving what the campaign is billing as a major economic speech at Cooper Union in NYC.
 
The NYT covers the release of Obama's tax returns going back to 2000 and decides to lead with the couple's increased charitable donations: "Some of the largest donations went to the Trinity United Church of Christ, whose pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., has been in the news for inflammatory messages in his sermons, causing Mr. Obama to distance himself from Mr. Wright, his former spiritual mentor. All told, the couple gave $27,500 to the church in 2005 and 2006.
 
“Although the campaign has not released the couple’s 2007 return, it has said the Obamas gave $240,000 to charity in 2007. This compares with charitable donations as low as $1,050 a few years ago.
 
“As for the other tax returns, ‘A spokesman for that campaign, Howard Wolfson, said that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton would release her returns dating from 2000 in the next week and that the Clintons had released 20 years of returns, until 2000, when Bill Clinton left the White House. Although there is no legal requirement that candidates release their tax returns, it has been common practice since the ’70s. A release typically occurs after a candidate becomes a party nominee, not in the primaries. Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, has not released his returns."

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The General Election

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:55 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Here's a set of issues that will no doubt come up in the fall.
 
"The Bush administration issued a grim report on Tuesday on the financial outlook for Medicare and Social Security, but said the condition of the programs had not significantly deteriorated since last spring. The new report, like the one issued last April, said Medicare’s hospital insurance trust fund would be exhausted in 2019, while Social Security’s reserves would be depleted in 2041." 
 
The L.A. Times notes the pres. campaigns greeted the new report with almost "deafening" silence. "As a result, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the presumed Republican presidential nominee, had little to say when the latest numbers were released projecting Medicare going into the red by 2019 and Social Security following in 2041. The Democratic contenders, Sens. Barack Obama of Illinois and Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, also sidestepped the issue." 
 
USA Today compares the health care plans of the three candidates and LARGELY lumps Clinton and Obama together and compares them to McCain's philosophy on the issue. 
 
McClatchy notes how both Clinton and Obama are ducking the gun issue and considering the primary states that are upcoming, every one of them has their share of Democratic voting gun advocates: PA, NC, KY, WV, IN, MT, SD and OR. 
 
The unintended consequence of the long primary campaign? Huge turnout and voter registration numbers for the Dems.
 
Here’s some fodder… check out Howard Dean’s assailing of the GOP, as quoted in the University of Wisconsin student paper. He said there is “no future” for youth in the Republican Party. “When you look at the candidates on our side who stood up and debated, people under 30 … looked at that lineup of our candidates and said, ‘That looks like us in 20 years,’” Dean said. He added when those young people looked at the Republican candidates, they saw “1950s television.”
 
And then, “They can’t become more diverse,” Dean said. “Who in their right mind, if they were African American or Hispanic or Asian American, if they were gay or lesbian, would join the Republican Party?”

DiscussDiscuss (20 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Not my party: Gravel bolts

Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:54 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

But he was the LIFE of the party! As NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann writes, One-time Democratic candidate Mike Gravel is leaving the Democratic Party, accusing it of "work[ing] in tandem with the corporate interests that control what we read and hear in the media." Greener pastures await, he says, with his joining today of the Libertarian Party, where he hopes to continue his presidential bid.

DiscussDiscuss (21 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Chelsea asked about Monica

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:19 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
Campaigning in Indianapolis for her mother, Chelsea Clinton had a quick retort when asked a question she had never had before. When a male student asked her if her mother's credibility had been hurt during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton quickly responded.
 
"Wow, you're the first person actually that's ever asked me that question, in the, maybe 70 college campuses that I've been to," Clinton bitterly said at Butler University.  "And I don't think that's any of your business." 

VIDEO: Chelsea Clinton had a speedy retort when asked about the Monica Lewinsky scandal during a visit to Butler University in Indianapolis.

The students gathered to see Clinton quickly erupted into applause. Clinton took one more question, on global warming, and then wrapped up the event.

*** UPDATE *** AP reports, "The college student who got a stinging brushback from Chelsea Clinton when he asked about the Monica Lewinsky scandal said Wednesday he's a Clinton supporter who was trying to get her to show 'what makes Hillary so strong.'

"Evan Strange, a Butler University student who works on the school's newspaper, The Butler Collegian, said he had asked Chelsea Clinton her opinion "on the criticism of her mother that how she handled the Lewinsky scandal might be a sign of weakness and she might not be a strong enough candidate to be president."

"I'm a supporter of Hillary. I love Hillary," Strange said Wednesday on CBS' "The Early Show." "He said he asked the question because his friends 'always bring up that scandal. It's not something I asked to cause trouble but to show those people what makes Hillary so strong.' He said that by brushing him off, Chelsea Clinton missed an opportunity to show her mother's strength.

" 'I was very surprised' at the rebuke, Strange said. 'I can see where she'd get a little defensive because of the question and hearing Lewinsky over and over again, but I would like to hear her say something about Hillary rather than dismissing the question.'"

DiscussDiscuss (1902 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton goes after McCain, Wright

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:14 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
GREENSBURG, Pa. -- Hillary Clinton compared her Republican rival McCain to Depression-era President Herbert Hoover in response to his criticism of her proposal to help homeowners facing foreclosures.

She also told reporters Tuesday that had the Rev. Jeremiah Wright been her pastor, she would have left the church and reiterated her explanation for misspeaking about dodging sniper fire in Bosnia.

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton takes questions from reporters during a campaign stop in Pennsylvania.

Clinton has proposed the government help people who are struggling to keep their homes by freezing foreclosures, guaranteeing new loans and possibly acting as a temporary purchaser of mortgages. McCain today warned against this kind of action saying, "I have always been committed to the principle that it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers."

Clinton bashed him for those remarks, which were read to her by a reporter.

"It sounds remarkably like Herbert Hoover,” she said, “and I don't think that's good economic policy. You know, we have a framework of regulation. It needs to be updated and modernized. The government has a number of tools at its disposal that are well-suited for just this situation, and I think that inaction has contributed to the problems we face today, and I believe further inaction would exacerbate those problems."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (145 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain on housing, hits Clinton plan

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:12 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
SANTA ANA, Calif. -- In what were his most extensive remarks on the current housing crisis to date, McCain spoke to nearly 20 cameras and a small crowd of local business owners here this morning and expressed his confidence in the foundations of the U.S. economy.

After what amounted to a brief primer on the creation of the subprime housing bubble, McCain tried to demonstrate his economic knowledge by explaining in some detail the "series of complex, inter-connected financial bets that were not transparent or fully understood," which contributed to the broader economic crisis now facing the country.

VIDEO: John McCain says that the government is not in the business of saving and rewarding banks or small borrowers who behave irresponsibly.

"I have always been committed to the principle that it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers," McCain said, beginning his proposed solutions. "Government assistance to the banking system should be based solely on preventing systemic risk that would endanger the entire financial system and the economy."

McCain did not specifically address the Fed's recent alleged "bail out" of Bear Stearns, but he seemed to imply support for such moves geared toward protecting the "entire financial system."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (41 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama camp responds

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:05 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Obama's campaign responded to Clinton's comments on the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

“After originally refusing to play politics with this issue, it’s disappointing to see Hillary Clinton’s campaign sink to this low in a transparent effort to distract attention away from the story she made up about dodging sniper fire in Bosnia,"  Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton writes. "The truth is, Barack Obama has already spoken out against his pastor’s offensive comments and addressed the issue of race in America with a deeply personal and uncommonly honest speech. The American people deserve better than tired political games that do nothing to solve the larger challenges facing this country.”

Clinton told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review editorial board, "He would not have been my pastor. You don't choose your family, but you choose what church you want to attend." She continued, "You know, I spoke out against Don Imus (who was fired from his radio and television shows after making racially insensitive remarks), saying that hate speech was unacceptable in any setting, and I believe that. I just think you have to speak out against that. You certainly have to do that, if not explicitly, then implicitly by getting up and moving."

She repeated similar comments at an on-camera press conference later in the day.

DiscussDiscuss (312 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Is Maria Cantwell wavering?

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:40 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
The Vancouver Columbian  [hat tip to our friends at Hotline] paraphrases Sen. Maria Cantwell as saying, “…[T]he candidate with the most pledged delegates at the end of the primary season in late June will have the strongest claim to the party’s presidential nomination.”

The paper adds, “Cantwell said she wouldn’t object to a primary contest that went into the summer if it focused on the issues facing the nation, but added, ‘We wouldn’t want to tear apart the party.’

“ ‘I think it’s important that we let it play out in June,’ she said. At that point, she said, ‘I’d be urging my party to make a decision.’”

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Nancy Reagan, McCain and stem cells

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:08 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Chris Donovan
In light of today’s news of Nancy Reagan’s endorsement of McCain -- the two will appear together this afternoon, the campaign said -- McCain has credited Nancy Reagan, in part, for his change in position on federal funding for stem cell research. He explained her impact on Meet the Press in 2005, and reiterated his support at the MSNBC presidential debate (with Nancy Reagan present) in May 2007.

Here's what was said:

FROM MEET THE PRESS (June 19, 2005):
TIM RUSSERT: Let me turn to another ethical, moral, political issue, stem cell research. In 2000, John McCain and 19 other senators wrote a letter which said "Since 1996 Congress has banned federal funding for `research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed.' ...we support [this law]."

You've changed your mind.

McCAIN: Yes, I have.

RUSSERT: Why?

McCAIN: For a large number of reasons, ranging from getting briefed by very smart people on this issue and including discussing this with Nancy Reagan who, as you know, is a very strong advocate for stem cell research. I want to make it clear that those of us who support this do not believe that it has anything to do with human cloning and all of us are against human cloning. I look forward to the debate. It's a very complex scientific issue. But for us to throw away opportunities to cure diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's and many others I think would be a mistake. I look forward to the debate. It's interesting that more than two-thirds of the American people support stem cell research.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (34 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's tax returns, rising fortunes

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 2:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Jim Popkin
The tax returns for Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, offer insights into the power couple's rising fortunes as Obama became a U.S. Senator and then a potential presidential candidate.

Obama today released his tax returns from 2000 to 2006. They show a steep increase in income. In 2000, for example, the Obamas' combined income was $240,505. That includes Sen. Obama's salary as a young state senator in Illinois, his fees ($16,500) as a "foundation director/educational speaker" and Michelle Obama's salary as a hospital administrator.

In 2006, by contrast, the Obamas' combined income was $983,826. Obama had become a U.S. Senator by then, making about $165,000 a year, and his wife's income at the University of Chicago hospitals had climbed sharply to about $265,000 a year. Sen. Obama's book-writing career also had become profitable, earning him $551,240 in author fees in tax year 2006 alone. Mrs. Obama also made $51,200 that year, as director of TreeHouse Foods, "a food manufacturer servicing primarily the retail grocery and foodservice chains," according to the company's website.

The Obamas' best financial year came in 2005, when their total combined income was $1.6 million. That included $1.2 million in author fees for Sen. Obama's best-selling books. Michelle Obama's salary that year was $316,962 plus another $45,000 for her role as director of TreeHouse Foods.

The Obamas became more charitable as their incomes grew. In 2000, the couple gave $2,350 to charity, or about 1 percent of their gross income. In 2006, they donated $60,307 to charities, or about 6 percent of their gross income. In 2005, the Obamas list a $5,000 donation to their church, Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, where the controversial Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr., was Sen. Obama's pastor. If Sen. Obama tithed more regularly to the church, there's no record of it in these tax returns.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (87 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: Issues not 'ya-ya-ya-ing'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 2:07 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli
FRANKFORT, Kent. -- Kicking off his first visit to the Bluegrass state, Bill Clinton said the primary contest should focus on issues, not "ya-ya-ing," referring in passing to an Obama supporter's claim that he engaged in McCarthyism last week.

Clinton was talking to the crowd at the Frankfort Convention Center about energy independence, when he stopped mid-thought.
 
"This is really what this election oughta be about, these kind of things, not a lot of this ya-ya-ing I hear about all the time," he said.

That line drew some applause, prompting the former president to reflect a moment. He then decided then to share one of his "Clinton's law of politics." "The level of sanctimony in the rhetoric is inversely related to the public benefit of the policy," he said, chuckling before adding: "I need to quit this. Somebody will probably figure out how to ... accuse me of being Joe McCarthy again on that."

VIDEO: Bill Clinton jokes about a comparison of him to Joe McCarthy, made by an Obama supporter over the weekend.

It was a passing reference, really. He then continued on to describe how cars could run on lithium batteries to get 100 miles per gallon. But it was the first public acknowledgement of the flap over his remarks in North Carolina last week that some viewed as an unspoken swipe at Obama's patriotism.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (41 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama NC backer 'appalled'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:57 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
RALEIGH, N.C. -- North Carolina reporters got a taste of conference call campaigning this afternoon, with Team Obama getting Carolina backer Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-1) on the horn to slam Hillary Clinton over her reported exaggerations of the perils of a trip to Bosnia in 1996. Butterfield, the only member of North Carolina's Democratic congressional delegation to have endorsed a candidate, said he is "appalled" on behalf of his constituents over the claim. Calling the misstatement "a strike against" the New York senator, he added that she owes the citizens of his state -- and America -- an apology for it.

Butterfield also expressed doubt that Clinton's tenure as First Lady has uniquely readied her for a position at the helm of America's foreign policy. "And now that she has missrepresented and exaggerated her trip to Bosnia," he argued, "[that] really leads me to the conclusion that she not only lacks the qualifications but that she doesn't see the importance of being accurate in making statements regarding her qualifications."

The call assures that Clinton's "minor blip," as she has called the incident, will be on the news media's radar in the Tar Heel State. New polling shows Obama bouncing back from deflated  numbers last week to regain a substantial lead after his recent visit to the state. (Note: this from a new PPP poll) 

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (87 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama releases tax returns to 2000

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:50 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
The Obama campaign released six years of tax returns today, trying to underscore their argument that they operate with transparency and pressure the  Clinton campaign to do the same. 
 
Communications Director Robert Gibbs asked why Sen. Clinton couldn't get someone to go down to Kinkos and photocopy her returns, so that the public could see how she could afford to loan her campaign $5 million and the $20 million payout from Yucaipa, a holding company that invests in tax shelter in the Cayman Islands.
 
The Obamas reported a gross income of more than $980,000 in 2006, a dip in income from 2005 when the couple reported close to $1.7 million in gross income.  You can see the tax returns here.
 
Asked why the campaign had decided to release the tax returns now, Gibbs sidestepped the question and pointed to the release of tax returns for 2007 earlier this year. He also asked for the address of the glass house the Clinton campaign resided in, when told that Clinton spokesman Phil Singer had questioned why Obama hadn't released his schedules from his years in the Illinois senate.
 
Obama has been questioned about his schedules by reporters before and has said that as a state senator, there was little in the way of record keeping by himself or his miniscule staff. Gibbs today said that his public correspondence is available and that the Clinton campaign had it. 
 
Clinton's schedules from her years as First Lady were just released after much arm-twisting by the press and conservative non-profit groups. Her tax returns have yet to be released.

DiscussDiscuss (26 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill Clinton Indiana wrap up

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:48 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli
SOUTH BEND, Ind. -- Amid a festive crowd celebrating Dyngus Day in the Hoosier State, Bill Clinton yesterday morning upped the ante on seating delegates from Florida and Michigan, criticizing his party’s “strategy of denying and disempowering and disenfranchising the voters” there. His argument to seat Florida’s delegates in particular came as he continued to claim that his wife would be the most electable general election candidate.
 
Clinton curiously said Democrats “let New Hampshire go out of turn,” adding that they have a Democratic Secretary of State. “The Florida voters are totally innocent. They asked to vote on time,” he said.
 
The Democratic National Committee’s preliminary calendar called for New Hampshire to vote on Jan. 22. But that Democratic secretary of state, Bill Gardner, moved the first-in-the-nation primary to Jan. 8 when Michigan settled on Jan. 15. The DNC chose not to sanction New Hampshire, since the calendar rules were originally set in part to protect the Granite State’s tradition of being the first-in-the-nation primary.
 
Clinton was joined by his daughter, Chelsea, and former Maryland Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend campaigning in what locals dubbed the “Dyngus Day Capital of the World.” Though Dyngus Days elsewhere have reportedly included drenching women with water, the event locally featured just brats, beers and Polish music. The event here is closely associated with politics, as well, which is what drew Townsend’s father, Robert F. Kennedy, to South Bend 40 years ago.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (14 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Not 'my pastor'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:36 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Clinton decided to weigh in on the Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy, telling the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, "He would not have been my pastor," Clinton said. "You don't choose your family, but you choose what church you want to attend."

She continued later, "You know, I spoke out against Don Imus (who was fired from his radio and television shows after making racially insensitive remarks), saying that hate speech was unacceptable in any setting, and I believe that. I just think you have to speak out against that. You certainly have to do that, if not explicitly, then implicitly by getting up and moving."

On her sniper gaffe, "I was sleep-deprived, and I misspoke." 

On earmarks: "I am proud of my earmarks. Part of the reason that I won New York by 67 percent are my earmarks."

DiscussDiscuss (84 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain and teleprompters

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:18 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
In a constant effort to improve its candidate's big speech abilities, the McCain campaign is using both a large flat screen monitor and two side pannel teleprompters for the candidate to read his prepared remarks on the housing crisis outside of LA, which he is delivering now. Teleprompters are nothing new for any of these candidates, but the McCain campaign had expressed concern that the side panel prompters made McCain look like he was watching a tennis match, but by using the large monitor fixed in the back of the room, McCain rarely shifted his gaze from straight ahead.

The hope is that by surrounding him with teleprompters McCain will be able to look more natural speaking to nearly 20 cameras in what will be his most extensive remarks on the housing crisis to date.

DiscussDiscuss (26 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain agrees with bin Laden?

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:16 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy
PALM SPRINGS, Calif. -- Usually the political response to a new message from Osama bin Laden is one of universal condemnation, but at a VFW hall in Chula Vista here yesterday, John McCain announced his support of bin Laden's most recent message.

"General Petraeus is correct when he says that the central battleground in the struggle against Al Qaeda is Iraq, and Osama bin Laden just confirmed that again with his comments last week," McCain said before quoting a line from a recent audio recording of bin Laden calling for support of the Mujahadeen in Iraq. 

VIDEO: McCain tells an audience that he agrees with Osama bin Laden's statement that Iraq is a primary battleground in the U.S. struggle against Al Qaeda.

McCain told reporters after his town hall, "General Petraeus and I and Osama bin Laden are in agreement. It is hard to understand why Senator Clinton and Senator Obama do not understand that [Iraq is the central battleground]. I don't know if it is naiveté or what the problem is but it's obvious that they're dead wrong, and they're wrong when they say that we should leave Iraq immediately… and it's time that they acknowledge that the surge is succeeding and the benefits of success in Iraq will spread throughout the entire Middle East."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

A former KY gov's colorful endorsement

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:43 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
FRANKFORT, Kent. -- Former Kentucky Governor Julian Carroll announced he's backing Clinton in the Democratic primary for president. Carroll announced his choice in the state capital before an event featuring Bill Clinton, who makes his first visit to the Bluegrass State today.
 
Carroll said he has known the Clintons since 1974, when he ascended to the governorship of Kentucky. "Look at me, I'm still goin! Look at that!" said Carroll, 76, kicking his heels at the podium.
 
"We need for our delegates to be cast in the lot of Hillary Clinton at the convention," he added. "That's what this is all about. ... I came today to put my personal endorsement, not only on my friend Bill Clinton ... but on Hillary Clinton, to be the next Democratic President of the United States."
 
Carroll was elected to a full term as governor in 1975; he now serves as a state senator representing a district that includes Frankfort.
 
The visit to Kentucky is the first by either Clinton, and comes two months before the state's primary. Hillary Clinton is expected to visit the state later this week.

DiscussDiscuss (48 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Math? What math?

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 11:09 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
On the subject of delegate math and what Clinton’s path to the nomination is with the current mathematical configuration, top Clinton aide and DNC rules guru Harold Ickes assailed the Obama campaign, rather than lay out Clinton's arithmetic.

“I hope they don’t get their hands on the federal budget, because they can’t count,” he said of the Obama campaign.

He stressed that neither campaign can win the nomination without the now 794 superdelegates. “Either candidate needs a substantial number of superdelegates to win,” Ickes said.

“The math argument has been turned on its head,” he said. He went on to hint that one of the ways the math is changing or might change is because “new information” is coming out or might come out about Obama, Ickes said.

For reference, here’s our superdelegate math today from First Thoughts:

If the remaining contests split up "as expected" meaning Clinton wins her base states (PA, KY, WV, etc.) and Obama wins his base states (NC, OR, MT, etc.) and the two split Indiana down the middle, the two campaigns will likely split those 566 delegates right down the middle 283-283 (margin of error +/- 5 delegates). This means Obama would need 34% of the uncommitted superdelegates to hit the magic 2024 number, while Clinton would need 72% of the uncommitted Supers to hit 2024. 

DiscussDiscuss (46 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Word of the Day: 'Misspoke'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 11:03 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Ron Allen
Here's my nominee for the word of the day -- if such a thing exists. It came from Hillary Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson yesterday, responding to questions about the senator's description of landing, "under sniper fire," at the Tuzla, Bosnia, airport while First Lady, as the war was winding down, back in 1996.

After citing numerous articles from the time, referring to the danger, and how unusual it was for a first lady to travel to such a war-torn place, Team Clinton conceded she "misspoke" about the sniper fire. And running with, "our heads down," from the airport.

Clinton herself told the editorial boards of the Philadelphia Daily News and Inquirer that she “misspoke.” Further clarifying her comments, she said the pilot aboard her aircraft had warned there was sniper fire in the area at the time when she was arriving in Tuzla.

VIDEO: NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports on Hillary Clinton misspeaking about being under fire during a 1996 trip to Bosnia.

“[W]hat I was told was that we had to land a certain way and move quickly because of the threat of sniper fire,” she said. “So I misspoke -- I didn't say that in my book or other times, but if I said something that made it seem as though there was actual fire -- that's not what I was told. I was told we had to land a certain way, we had to have our bulletproof stuff on because of the threat of sniper fire."

She added later, "I gave contemporaneous accounts, I wrote about a lot of this in my book. you know, I think that, a minor blip, you know, if I said something that, you know, I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a mistatement."

So why does this matter? Because Clinton has been accused of inflating her national security credentials to prove she has "passed the Commander-In-Chief test. That's the "test" that exists somewhere in the minds of her campaign staff, a test Sen. Barack Obama has not passed, according to Team Clinton, even though by every measure, except electoral votes won, he's winning the race.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (69 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: The tipping point

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:41 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Domenico Montanaro
War of words: Democrats who don't have a horse in the presidential race, but do have to worry about House and Senate races are starting to wonder aloud if this protracted primary fight has hit a tipping point. Every day this goes on, they say, is bad for the party as a whole. Every day this goes on, they say, is bad for the party as a whole. Remember, there's a reason that the party that gets its nominee first has won 9 of the last 10 presidential elections. Think about the most recent and memorable primary fights for presidential nominations: Ford-Reagan; Kennedy-Carter; Mondale-Hart, not a single ultimate general-election winner. And all three, to this day, have bitter partisans who still bicker about that fight. The same thing is happening with Obama-Clinton. There's a real bitterness developing that rivals these other three examples. Check out how James Carville didn't back down from his "Judas" remark on Richardson at all. In a conference call with reporters Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson said, "If I had said it, I would apologize, because I am representing the campaign. I did not say it, and if I had I would." Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign is using Gen. McPeak's "McCarthy" attack on President Clinton and trying to raise money off of it.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd talks about potential fatigue within the Democratic Party as a result of the prolonged nominating contest.
 
*** “Misspoke?”: The Clinton campaign in a conference call yesterday said Hillary Clinton “misspoke” when she said, “I remember landing under sniper fire” during her trip to Bosnia. OK. But there are two problems. What she said was with certitude (the remarks you can find on her Web site; those remarks on the web site, by the way, are "as delivered" not "prepared for delivery" as was mistakenly reported by one of us on TODAY). But beside that, as NBC’s Ron Allen writes, “Believe me, if you've ever been in a place where there is real sniper fire, it’s unforgettable…. As her team points out, Obama probably doesn't have very many, if any, similar experiences to talk about. But, apparently embellishing a story, or ‘misspeaking’ about it, will only lead to more questions about what Clinton really did when she was in places like Bosnia.” Or her role in the Irish peace talks or in children's health care, etc. This brings a focus back on her at a time when she'd rather see the press continue its focus on Obama. For instance, were it not for the Bosnia story, today's NYT piece on Obama's liberal record in the Senate might be the cable talker of choice.  
 
*** Women back in Focus: The last two weeks were dominated by race and yesterday, in addition to her speech on housing, Hillary Clinton held a “Women for Hillary” rally -- “the first such event in weeks,” notes NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones. This was something that was routine in Iowa and New Hampshire, but has faded of late. Is gender politics making a comeback?  Women, particularly older women, have been the backbone of Clinton's support both at the ballot box and apparently in her bank account. Pushing the issue of gender is also a way to create a movement that is similar to what has propelled Obama. The one demographic subgroup among women that has eluded Clinton to an extent has been educated younger white women. If she can crack this code, she'll have the chance to really make up ground fast in places like North Carolina and Indiana, let alone over-perform in the Philly suburbs and potentially keep Obama's vote total lower than expected in Pennsylvania.
 
*** Bluegrass primary? Bill Clinton campaigns hard in Kentucky today. Yes, Kentucky, which holds its primary on May 20th. Is this a sign this will go on and on and on -- even if Clinton loses Indiana or North Carolina? Clearly Kentucky is one Clinton's base states of the contests that remain and considering that the campaign still doesn't have the money to start paid advertising in Pennsylvania, let alone the May primaries, the campaign has now decided it's important to start showing up some of these places early so that Obama doesn't get the head start he's gotten in so many of these places. Bill Clinton's been used more and more as the campaign guinea pig, sending him first in some of these places to see what the response will be. He was in Indiana before his wife; he's hit North Carolina before his wife and now he'll hit Kentucky first as well.

*** Another sign of things to come? By the way, check out the added stop Hillary Clinton has made for Montana on 4/5 and 4/6. Montana is a JUNE primary state; the last day of the primary season. No doubt Clinton is sending the subtle message that she's in this race to the end. But why else would she set a Montana campaign stop two months before the primary? Is there an endorsement she's bagged that she'll unveil that day? Look for reporters to start making calls to Montana's Democratic hierarchy, all of whom would be good gets for Clinton: Gov. Schweitzer or Sens. Baucus and Tester.

*** More fun with delegate math: It's been a while since we've done the percentage game on the delegate count. Here's where things stand right now. Obama leads among pledged delegates 1408-1251; Clinton leads among superdelegates, 255-218. Added together, Obama's overall delegate lead is 120, 1626-1506. Now, what's left? There are still 10 pledged delegates NBC News hasn’t allocated from contests already held. In addition, there are 566 delegates at stake in the remaining contests. On the supers front, there are 321 folks who haven't picked sides (76 of whom have yet to be named; they'll get named at state convention meetings held between now and the end of June). OK, now, let's play the math game. If the remaining contests split up "as expected" meaning Clinton wins her base states (PA, KY, WV etc.) and Obama wins his base states (NC, OR, MT etc.) and the two split Indiana down the middle, the two campaigns will likely split those 566 delegates right down the middle 283-283 (margin of error +/- 5 delegates). This means Obama would need 34% of the uncommitted superdelegates to hit the magic 2024 number, while Clinton would need 72% of the uncommitted Supers to hit 2024.  

*** Messages of the day: While Obama finishes up his vacation, both Clinton and McCain have major speeches today on two different topics. Clinton will focus on Social Security, timed for the release of the government's report on the long-term viability of the government trust fund. Word is Clinton will pop McCain on the issue; Meanwhile, McCain, fresh from Iraq, will talk about the housing/mortgage issue in a speech in California. The speech is more of a lesson in how this happened and a promise that he'll be open to some government solutions but he wants to make sure we're not bailing out speculators. Like Clinton and Obama, he calls for a summit of sorts, McCain's summit would be with the largest mortgage lenders.
 
*** On the trail: Clinton makes two stops in Pennsylvania, including a town hall and a meeting at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review; McCain again raises money in California; Bill Clinton makes four stops in Kentucky; and Obama is still on vacation with his family and will be back Wednesday.
 
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 28 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 42 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 224 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 301 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (57 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: 'Fuzzy math'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:36 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The New York Post calls the latest Clinton spin, that she leads Obama in electoral votes, “fuzzy math.” “She's behind Barack Obama in popular votes, delegates and overall wins, but Hillary Rodham Clinton's backers have found a new way to claim their candidate is on top…”

PENNSYLVANIA: 4/22 (158 delegates)
“Democratic Party enrollment surged past the 4 million mark Monday, setting a state record on the last day Pennsylvanians had to register to vote in next month's presidential primary. The figures, which showed modest declines in the ranks of Republicans and independents, reflected intense interest in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination and recruitment efforts by both candidates.”

Some notes from NBC/NJ’s Matthew Berger:
*The Obama team has not released which cities the candidate will visit in a six-day bus tour across the state, which starts Friday in western Pennsylvania and conclude in the southeast.

*Obama’s team may still be getting their bearings in the Keystone State. They labeled a press release with the dateline “Pennsylvania, Pa.”

*SEIU leaders said they are planning on focusing on “member-to-member” contacts throughout Pennsylvania, choosing not to air advertisements for Obama at this time. “We think in Pennsylvania, the more workers can talk to workers, the more influential we can be,” said Anna Burger, SEIU Secretary-Treasurer, in a conference call with reporters Monday.

At 4:30 p.m. Monday, as the doors to Chester County Voter Services automatically clicked shut, several people pleaded for entry, to register to vote for the primary. Election officials across the state said they had never seen a rush like what occurred over the weekend. Obama campaign aides were at the Voter Services door, ready to give those shut out alternative suggestions to register in time. 

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (19 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: 'Misspoke'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:31 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Clinton's '96 Bosnia trip is getting renewed scrutiny as the campaign -- and the candidate -- now admits Clinton “misspoke” when she talked about her remembrances of that trip. The archive video footage seems to contradict Clinton's memory. "Video footage of that trip shows a smiling Clinton and her then-teenage daughter, Chelsea, casually walking -- without helmets -- from the helicopter to an outdoor welcoming ceremony,” the LA Times writes. "‘On one occasion, she misspoke,’ Clinton campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson said Monday in reference to her Washington speech.

“In fact, Clinton also referred to having to move the Bosnia welcoming ceremony inside at least one other time, on Feb. 29. But, Wolfson insisted, Clinton was potentially in danger. ‘There were reports of snipers in the hills and they were forced to cut short an event on the tarmac. That is what she wrote in her book,’ he said of Clinton's memoirs.

“The Obama camp jumped on the discrepancies. ‘When you make a false claim that's in your prepared remarks, it's not misspeaking, it's misleading, and it's part of a troubling pattern of Sen. Clinton inflating her foreign policy experience," Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said.’

In a meeting with the joint editorial boards of the Philadelphia Daily News and Inquirer, Clinton acknowledged that she “misspoke,” made a “misstatement” in her remarks on her 1996 Bosnia trip. Here’s what she said, in part: "Now let me tell you what I can remember, OK -- because what I was told was that we had to land a certain way and move quickly because of the threat of sniper fire. So I misspoke -- I didn't say that in my book or other times but if I said something that made it seem as though there was actual fire -- that's not what I was told. I was told we had to land a certain way, we had to have our bulletproof stuff on because of the threat of sniper fire."

More: "I gave contemporaneous accounts, I wrote about a lot of this in my book. you know, I think that, a minor blip, you know, if I said something that, you know, I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a mistatement."

The Boston Globe: “Clinton's recall of Bosnia faulted.”

Clinton should have owned the news cycle with her unveiling of her mortgage/housing plan but the mini-feeding frenzy that developed over the Bosnia trip seemed to step on things.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (54 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: 'We’re succeeding'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:29 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Returning from his eighth trip to Iraq, McCain didn't back down on his promise to see the war through despite yesterday's tragic milestone of 4,000 deaths. “We're succeeding. I don't care what anybody says. I've seen the facts on the ground," the Arizona senator insisted a day after a roadside bomb in Baghdad killed four U.S. soldiers and rockets pounded the U.S.-protected Green Zone there, and a wave of attacks left at least 61 Iraqis dead nationwide. The events transpired as bin Laden called on the people of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Saudi Arabia to ‘help in support of their mujahedeen brothers in Iraq, which is the greatest opportunity and the biggest task.’”

Did McCain really say he agrees with Osama bin Laden? On the day the 4,000th American troop was killed in Iraq, McCain said, per NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy, "General Petraeus is correct when he says that the central battleground in the struggle against Al Qaeda is Iraq, and Osama bin Laden just confirmed that again with his comments last week," referring to a recent audio recording of bin Laden calling for support of the Mujahadeen in Iraq. 

McCain told reporters after his town hall, "Gen. Petraeus and I and Osama bin Laden are in agreement. It is hard to understand why Senator Clinton and Senator Obama do not understand that [Iraq is the central battleground]. I don't know if it is naiveté or what the problem is but it's obvious that they're dead wrong, and they're wrong when they say that we should leave Iraq immediately… and it's time that they acknowledge that the surge is succeeding and the benefits of success in Iraq will spread throughout the entire Middle East."

The al Qaeda-Iraq argument is a tack the RNC is also taking up against Clinton and Obama, as they wrote in one recent document e-mailed to media, entitled: “While Bin Laden Urges Followers To Fight In Iraq, Clinton And Obama Deny That It Is A Key Terrorist Battleground.”

The DNC has been going after McCain on Iraq and his offhanded “100 years” comment, which is almost assuredly going to end up in ads.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (20 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: 'Most liberal?'

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:27 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The NYT looks at the National Journal rating of Obama as the most liberal member of the Senate and the fallout it could cause. "In many ways, the Obama campaign is challenging the fundamental political premise that has prevailed in Washington for more than a generation: that any majority coalition must be carefully centrist, if not center-right. Bill Clinton ran in 1992 as a candidate willing to break with liberal orthodoxy on many issues, including crime and welfare, and eager to move the party -- which had lost five of the six previous presidential elections -- to the middle. Mr. Clinton’s New Democrats assumed a certain level of conservatism among voters.

Mr. Obama and his allies are basing his campaign on a different bet: that the right-leaning political landscape Mr. Clinton confronted has changed. Several major Democratic strategists, and outside analysts as well, argue that the country has shifted to the left because of the Iraq war, the economy and seven-plus years of President Bush, and that it has become open to a new progressive majority."
 
McClatchy does a fact-check of sorts on Obama's senate record vs. his presidential rhetoric. "Obama says if he were president, he'd take politically courageous stands while forging the consensus needed to enact universal healthcare, immigration revisions, global warming legislation and a withdrawal from Iraq. His three-year record in the Senate, however, offers little evidence that he can do what he's promising. His party was in the minority for his first two years, and in the third he began campaigning for president and missed lots of time on Capitol Hill. He was absent from or only partly involved in some key bipartisan efforts to head off stalemates on judicial nominations, immigration and Iraq war policy."
 
In an interview with Carroll County, Iowa, columnist Doug Burns of the Iowa Independent, ex-Iowa Dem Chair/Obama Iowa co-chair Gordon Fischer says his hit on Pres. Clinton on the blue dress comment was wrong. "It was stupid, idiotic," Fischer said. "I deserve all the venom."
 
“In a phone interview, Fischer explained that anger with what he believed to be President Clinton's challenge to Obama's patriotism motivated the post on his blog and a challenging if not hostile comment on Facebook. The swirl of media attention has so far centered on the post on Fisher's personal blog in which he references Monica Lewinsky's infamous blue dress.
 
More Fischer: “He has removed the controversial post from his personal blog, iowatrueblue.com, but the Facebook comment is alive and readable. When asked if the "you are now on notice" line was a warning shot before the blog post or a threat of some other action, Fischer, a Des Moines employment lawyer who chaired the IDP from 2002 to 2004, said it was meant in a more general sense for both Obama and Clinton supporters whom he believes are engaging in damaging internacine warfare. ‘The feeling I had was that some folks in both camps need to rein in the excesses,’ Fischer said. ‘I myself need to be reined in.’”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (23 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

It just gets weirder...

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:22 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Eliot Spitzer steps down after he’s found linked to a high-priced prostitution ring. His successor -- a history making blind African American -- is widely hailed as a uniter not a divider by both sides. Then, we find out he and his wife have both had extramarital affairs and last night, in an interview with local TV station NY1, David Paterson admits to youthful marijuana and cocaine use. (The New York Post today dubs him Doobie Dave for it.)

Here’s the transcript of part of the interview with NY1’s Dominic Carter:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (9 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Money and McCarthy

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:00 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Here's the latest fundraising e-mail effort in this livewire contest's war of vitriol...

Dear Friend,

Do you think Bill Clinton is like Joe McCarthy?

Of course you don't. Neither do I. But Barack Obama must because this past weekend, his campaign compared President Clinton to Joe McCarthy. Joe McCarthy!

Ever since we won in Ohio and Texas we have been seeing these kinds of personal attacks from the Obama campaign. It's hard to believe that a campaign that talks so much about changing the tenor of our politics would employ these kinds of tactics, but its the kind of thing we are seeing every day from Senator Obama and his campaign.

Here is just a small sample of the words they have used to describe Hillary and her campaign: "disingenuous," "divisive," "untruthful," "dishonest," and much more.

Well I'm not going to stand for it, and neither should you. There's no better way to fight back than to show your support for our campaign in the face of these attacks.

Click here to make a contribution and help us fight the negative attacks.

I appreciate everything you're doing to help Hillary win, and I know she does too. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Terry McAuliffe
Chairman, Hillary Clinton for President

DiscussDiscuss (59 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: 'She can win;' Obama, well…

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:23 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli
Here are some interesting quotes from two small Bill Clinton events in South Bend, Ind., this morning. The first is from a Dyngus Day celebration at the West Side Democratic Club:

"She can win this race, and we have got to win. And she will win in Florida. And I must say that this new strategy of denying and disempowering and disenfranchising the voters in Florida and Michigan is I believe a terrible mistake. Hillary believes their votes should be counted. And I don't know how we're gonna go to those people in the general election and say you gotta vote for us even though we dumped all over you in the primary. We let New Hampshire go out of turn. They had a Democratic Secretary of State. The Florida voters are totally innocent. They asked to vote on time. So for all those reasons I think she's the most electable.”

VIDEO: Bill Clinton touts his wife's general election chances against McCain during a campaign stop in South Bend, Ind.

The second quote is from a Solidarity Day event at an Elks club:

"I think she can win the election. And I believe that she will win Ohio, Florida, West Virginia, and Arkansas -- four states that we have lost the last two times. If we win Ohio and Florida, it's inconceivable that we could lose the election. And I think that we are running the risk of throwing both Florida and Michigan away if she doesn't get nominated because of the events of the last few days where there has been a deliberate attempt to disenfranchise those voters. And don't you think there has not been a message there. Don't you think that they didn't get it?

“And Sen. McCain is not going to be easy to beat; he has always run well in Michigan. He will run pretty well in Florida. She can win.  Look, if we win these four states we will win the White House; there is no point in doing this if we are not going to win."

DiscussDiscuss (61 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton rallies PA women

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:06 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
BLUE BELL, Pa. -- In the first such event in weeks, Clinton revved up the crowd at a "Women for Hillary" rally outside Philadelphia Monday.

It was of no surprise to find the gym at Montgomery County Community College populated overwhelmingly by women. They made up about 90 percent of the crowd.

It's been a while since the New York senator hoping to become the first woman president has focused on issues of specific concern to women or held a woman-specific event.

She spent some time talking about the changing attitudes in the country and the erosion of barriers holding back women and others. She said the changes had allowed her and Obama to run for the Democratic nomination.

"I think that says a lot,” she said. It says a lot about who we are as a party and who we are as a country.”

Clinton brought back lines we haven't heard in a long time, like mentioning the women who come up to her and tell her they were born before women could vote but would live long enough to see a woman president. Variations on that phrase were common in the Iowa days.

Clinton said issues like the economy and health care were of special concern to women.

"Women make most of the healthcare decisions in America," she said. "For women, healthcare is a constant worry. You never can have it far from your mind, can you? Because you think about it all the time, 'What happens if--?' You know, I'm the designated worrier in my family and most women I know assume that role and the piece of mind that is never there because, can you let your son or your daughter play sports if you don't have health insurance? What if something happens?"

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

SEIU to focus on Obama ground game

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 2:49 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Matthew Berger
PHILADELPHIA, Pa. -- SEIU leaders said they are planning on focusing on “member-to-member” contacts throughout Pennsylvania, choosing not to air advertisements for Obama at this time.

“We think in Pennsylvania, the more workers can talk to workers, the more influential we can be,” said Anna Burger, SEIU Secretary-Treasurer, in a conference call with reporters Monday.

There are more than 75,000 SEIU members in the Keystone State, and the union is setting up eight sites across Pennsylvania. The focus has been on registration through Monday, the deadline for residents to register to vote or change their party affiliation. The next step will be educating members.

While SEIU aired ads for Obama, shortly after announcing their national endorsement, before the Ohio primary, they are not planning to go on television or radio in Pennsylvania at this time. “But that could change,” Burger said.

“We think the candidates are spending so much on the air, it's more important for us to be on the door and on the ground,” she said.

After a compressed primary schedule earlier this year, union officials said the extra time has allowed them to ensure their membership rolls are up to date and to better organize themselves in the field, which lessened the need for media buys. Burger said members have been spontaneously reaching out to union officials, interested in the race and getting involved.

When asked if Obama could win the union vote in Pennsylvania, with polls showing Clinton at a 15-point advantage, Burger said she thought “we can narrow the gap.”

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The candidates on Iraq and 4,000

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 1:54 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
On the heels of the news that the U.S. death toll in Iraq has risen to 4,000, the Clinton and Obama campaigns issued statements. Here they are:

CLINTON: "Five years after the start of the war in Iraq, there have now been 4,000 U.S. military deaths in Iraq. On this solemn day, we remember the sacrifice of our brave men and women in uniform. We honor the tens of thousands more who have suffered wounds both visible and invisible, wounds that scar bodies and minds, and hearts as well. We honor the sacrifices of their families, a price paid in empty places at the dinner table, in the struggle to raise children alone, in the wrenching reversal of parents burying children.

"In the last five years, our soldiers have done everything we asked of them and more. They were asked to remove Saddam Hussein from power and bring him to justice and they did. They were asked to give the Iraqi people the opportunity for free and fair elections and they did. They were asked to give the Iraqi government the space and time for political reconciliation, and they did. So for every American soldier who has made the ultimate sacrifice for this mission, we should imagine carved in stone: 'They gave their life for the greatest gift one can give to a fellow human being, the gift of freedom.'

"I recall the great honor of meeting many of our brave men and women who have served our country. In meeting them, I am always struck by how, no matter how great their suffering, no matter how grave their own injuries, they always say the same thing to me: "Promise that you'll take care of my buddies. They're still over there. Promise you'll keep them safe."
I have looked those men and women in the eye. I have made that promise. And I intend to honor it by bringing a responsible end to this war, and bringing our troops home safely."

OBAMA: "It is with great sadness that we have reached another grim milestone in Iraq, with at least 4,000 of our finest Americans having been killed. Each death is a tragedy, and we honor every fallen American and send our thoughts and prayers to their families. It is past time to end this war that should never have been waged by bringing our troops home, and finally pushing Iraq's leaders to take responsibility for their future. As we do, we must serve the memory of all who have died as well as they served our country, by providing support for their families, caring for our troops and veterans, and upholding the American values which our fallen heroes exemplified through their service."

DiscussDiscuss (70 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama adviser invokes 'blue dress'

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 1:33 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Obama adviser Gordon Fischer invoked the Monica Lewinsky scandal on his blog while defending another adviser's likening of Bill Clinton to Joe McCarthy, saying Bill Clinton has put "a stain on his legacy, much worse, much deeper, than the one on Monica's blue dress."

He has since apologized for the comment.

"B. Clinton questions Obama's patriotism. In repsonse, an Obama aide compared B. Clinton to Joe McCarthy. This is patently unfair. To McCarthy,"
Fischer, a former Iowa Democratic Party chairman who was seen as a key Iowa pick up for Obama, wrote on his blog. "When Joe McCarthy questioned others' patriotism, McCarthy (1) actually believed, at least aparently, the questions were genuine, and (2) he did so in order to build up, not tear down, his own party, the GOP. Bill Clinton cannot possibly seriously believe Obama is not a patriot, and cannot possibly be said to be helping -- instead he is hurting -- his own party.  B. Clinton should never be forgiven.  Period.  This is a stain on his legacy, much worse, much deeper, than the one on Monica's blue dress."

He later wrote ABC News, part of which he posted on his blog: "On my individual blog, I made a stupid comment.  I sincerely apologize for a tasteless and gratituous comment I made here about President Clinton. It was unnecessary and wrong. I have since deleted the comment, and again apologize for making it. It will not happen again. I hope my readers will accept my apology and we can move on to the very important issues facing our state and country. Thank you."

"A sincere apology is always a good thing," Clinton Communication Director Howard Wolfson said in a conference call with reporters. "But I don’t know why he would apologize; it seems consistent with the kind of campaign the Obama campaign is trying to run."

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton talks housing crisis, Iraq

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:56 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
PHILADELPHIA, Pa. -- Clinton called for a non-partisan federal emergency working group on home foreclosures that would meet to figure out how best to deal with the mortgage crisis.

The senator catalogued the problems facing the economy, including high gas prices, job losses and the credit crunch that has stemmed from problems in the mortgage market and said "confidence" was the currency of the American economy that the federal government should take stronger steps to shore it up.

"How do we keep today's turmoil from spiraling into a long and painful recession?" Clinton asked in her opening remarks.

She said more than 10 percent of all homeowners were struggling with mortgages underwater, a figure she said was the highest percentage since the Great Depression.

VIDEO: Clinton lays out her policy for combating the home foreclosure crisis during a speech in Philadelphia, Pa.

Clinton went on to repeat her call for a moratorium on home foreclosures and said she supported the legislation introduced by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) that would expand the government's capacity to guarantee new loans from banks that help families facing foreclosure. She also said a government entity like the Federal Housing Authority may have to act as a temporary purchaser of mortgages.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (34 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama camp spin

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:11 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
Trying to set the tone of the day again, the Obama campaign held a morning conference call to push back against Clinton's speech this morning on leadership in the economy.

Campaign manager David Plouffe claimed that Clinton couldn't change the system, when she was "wallowing" in special interest influence and money. He cited issue break-out sessions lobbyists had paid to attend with Clinton as well as ties to the financial industry, which he claimed would make it difficult for her to provide real reform.

Looking more broadly at the state of the race and the delegate count, Plouffe claimed that the Clinton campaign tried to create a new rationale every day for how the nominee should be selected. "Next, it will be that only states starting with 'N' should count" toward picking the nominee, Plouffe said.

He also acknowledged, after prodding, that Gen. McPeak's comments, which compared Bill Clinton to Joe McCarthy, didn't have a place in the race, but adamantly insisted that the Clinton campaign had a habit of making inappropriate comments and then saying their meaning was misinterpreted.

DiscussDiscuss (79 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Fred's back

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:32 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
It's back to Hollywood for Fred Thompson. The as-seen-on-TV candidate, who dropped out after his once-vaunted presidential run faded, has been signed by a high-powered Hollywood agency.

The "William Morris Agency announced this week that it has signed the actor/politician, signaling a return to the screen for the former senator from Tennessee," the AP reports.

Maybe he can become president in 2008 after all -- even if it is just pretend.

DiscussDiscuss (18 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Clinton's Day

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:55 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Domenico Montanaro
*** Clinton’s day: The candidates have been taking a breather. Clinton was down all weekend, and Obama has left the continental U.S. for some quality time with the family and won’t check back in until Wednesday. (BTW, since he's reportedly so close, will Obama stop off in Puerto Rico on his way home? But we digress). It should be a slow week but noting that we’ve said THAT before. As for today, it is Clinton’s day. She could dominate the news cycle with a major speech on the housing crisis in Pennsylvania. On this issue, Clinton has devoted more campaign time to the issue than either Obama or McCain. It's potentially in Clinton's wheelhouse for a number of reasons: (1) She's seen as the candidate of policy positions; she's bread and butter not inspiration and that could play well with Pennsylvania's blue-collar housing-nervous electorate and (2) Her last name is a solid credential on the economy. While Clinton's tried to (sometimes clumsily; see Bosnia) claim foreign policy experience in her days as First Lady, the real benefit she should be figuring out how to get out of the Clinton presidential years is credit on the economy; those were the real successes of the Clinton year; if anything foreign policy was, at best, a mixed bag and only now being seen in a more positive light by some because of the current president.
 
*** "All this other stuff..." Bill Clinton's Friday afternoon comments about why he thinks a Clinton-McCain contest will be better for the country has been viewed by Obama supporters has an attack on the candidate's patriotism. But be sure to focus on this phrase, "all this other stuff" intruding on the campaign and less on the "loves America" line. Wasn't Clinton sending another message to the crowd of older, white male voters? (Remember, he was at a VFW and there was barely a member of the audience under 60, according to our reporter in the field)? The message: That if you don't want to talk about race, then Clinton's the candidate; if you do want race intruding into the campaign, then support Obama. There are many older, white voters, while sympathetic to Obama's message on race, don't want to be reminded to take their medicine and the subtle message Clinton may actually have been sending was just that, support Clinton and avoid taking your race medicine.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd discusses the Clinton campaign's reaction to Gov. Bill Richardson's endorsement of Obama last week.
 
*** The latest spin: So yesterday on the Sunday shows, two Clinton surrogates made their latest case to the superdelegates, which is, add up the electoral votes of the states won by Clinton vs. the states won by Obama. Why this metric? Because it is the only metric the Clinton campaign has come up with yet has her ahead: she's behind in popular vote, behind in delegates earned JUST through primaries and behind in pledged delegates. Of course, keep in mind, two of Kerry's final primary victories in '04 which essentially drove everyone out of the race (though the candidates did fight through Wisconsin) was Virginia and Tennessee; Kerry didn't carry either state. The motivation to use this Electoral College talking point is yet another attempt by the Clinton camp to discount some of Obama's small-state victories because Obama's won nearly twice the number of states. If you recall, in '00, during the recount dispute, the Bush campaign made sure the country saw that county-by-county map from around the country which showed the country in a sea of red. Obama's victory map, right now, looks more impressive than Clinton's visually. By the way, one other point, there's a reason Clinton's done well in bigger states, and that's time. Obama starts off behind some 15-20 points in most of these big states; when he campaigns in the state, he always closes the gap to a point. But is the de facto lever pull for less informed Dems Clinton until Obama spends an enormous amount of money? Just asking...
 
*** Hello, my name is…: The NYT’s/CNBC’s John Harwood curtain raises the planned re-introduction of McCain to the American populace. Campaign Manager Rick “Davis’s plan involves laying a sturdier foundation for Mr. McCain’s positive, but relatively shallow, public image,” Harwood writes. “It starts in earnest on March 31 with a ‘Service for America’ tour, intended to link the senator’s biography with his values and policy stances. Along the way, it will underscore life events that occurred in battleground states -- like Virginia, where Mr. McCain attended high school, and Florida, where he trained as a Navy pilot. He will address the dominant domestic issue with events in April promoting his economic agenda.” In addition, McCain will also continue to try and put together a campaign infrastructure; He still doesn't have a pollster and he may need a new media consultant since Mark McKinnnon has said he won't work against Obama. By the way, will conservative talk radio take a break from Rev. Wright to discuss the NYT piece about McCain's two flirtations with leaving the GOP? Our guess: no. What's done is done; had the GOP primary still been active when this story hit, then maybe this would have become a hot topic.
 
*** California going e-Bay? Speaking of the McCain team, get to know e-Bay CEO Meg Whitman, who may be using her role as National co-chair of McCain's campaign to size up a California governor’s run in 2010. The L.A. Times has the scoop (Addendum: Actually, our friends at the Cailfornia Target Book broke the news of Whitman's interest in running for governor back in December) on the pro-choice businesswoman who wasn't a registered Republican for much of her time in California. The state GOP is always looking for a non-conforming party person to run for statewide office and it looks like Whitman is the current dream candidate for 2010.
 
*** Dyngus Day: Sometimes we wish we worked for Stewart or Conan or Jay or Dave or even Jimmy. Why? Because of days like this. Bill Clinton is in Indiana (with Chelsea), celebrating Dyngus Day, which according to one Google search, is a Polish holiday where guys get to drench gals in water. (Seriously, we’re not making this up!); Apparently tomorrow, gals get to throw dishes at the guys. Just what part of Dyngus Day will Bill Clinton take part in? Ok, sorry, couldn't help ourselves, but seriously...

*** The Delegate Count: Obama leads Clinton 1,626-1,506 overall. This includes the pledged count of Obama 1,408, Clinton 1,251 and the superdelegate count of Clinton 255, Obama 218. in the popular vote, Obama is ahead 13,405,271-12,706,194.
 
*** On the trail: Today is the last day voters in Pennsylvania voters can register to vote as Dems to participate in the 4/22 Dem primary. Clinton makes three stops in Pennsylvania, including her housing speech; McCain has two California fundraisers and holds a town hall there; Bill Clinton makes five stops in Indiana (including Dyngus Day celebrations); and Obama is on family vacation.
 
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 29 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 43 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 225 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 302 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.  
 
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (100 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: Exaggerations…

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:45 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Post does some resume busting on both Obama and Clinton, writing about instances where both Clinton and Obama embellished their roles in various policy fights. 
 
AP: “Clinton and Barack Obama took a much-needed rest from their presidential campaigns on Easter Sunday as their tight race for the Democratic nomination looked set to drag on for months. Republican John McCain, who has locked up his party's nomination, returned from an overseas trip where he tried to polish his foreign policy credentials and prepared for a fundraising swing through Western states this week.” More: “Clinton took Friday through Sunday off from active campaigning and was scheduled to resume events in Pennsylvania on Monday. Obama, who campaigned in Oregon on Saturday, was taking a vacation with his family and would not return to active campaigning until Wednesday in North Carolina.”
 
Sen. Arlen Specter urged Attorney General Michael Mukasey to investigate the passport breaches of all three presidential candidates, “saying the breach could be a violation of several federal criminal statutes. Specter also indicated that the Judiciary Committee might take a look as well. ‘Privacy is a very fundamental matter. And if you can't have privacy for Senator McCain and Senator Clinton and Senator Obama, so what's the average person facing?’ he said.” 
 
The Boston Globe profiles James Roosevelt, co-chairman of the Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee. He was called “unflappable” and “perfect” for the job by supporters of both Clinton and Obama. When it’s formed in June, Roosevelt will also co-chair the convention credentials committee, which is where the Florida-Michigan fight goes if it’s not settled beforehand. Roosevelt "is going to have to be Jesus and Moses all at the same time, and maybe Solomon, too,” said Don Fowler, the 1995 party chairman, who appointed Roosevelt to the RBC co-chairmanship. 
 
Salon's Walter Shapiro laments the Dem primary calendar. "With more than five months to the Denver Convention, the problem for the Democrats remains the crazy-quilt schedule that caused far too many to vote too soon. That is the real buyer's remorse -- a front-loaded political calendar that has turned most partisan Democrats into now-irrelevant bystanders just when a real decision is needed."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (29 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Happy Dyngus Day!

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:40 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Clinton hits the trail today in Philly to give what the campaign is billing as a major speech. She'll unveil a four-part plan to address underwater mortgages, the broader housing crisis and credit crisis. She'll call for a broader government role in buying out underwater mortgages and protecting homeowners. Clinton has consistently talked more about this issue more than either of her two foes, Obama or McCain. (See excerpts below.)
 
Meanwhile, Bill and Chelsea hit Indiana all day today. They'll be there for something called Dyngus Day. According to one Google search, Dyngus Day is a day where guys get to drench gals in water; apparently tomorrow, gals get to throw dishes at the guys. It's a Polish holiday. Of course, what part of Dyngus Day will Bill Clinton take part in?
 
The newest Clinton campaign talking point to justify how superdelegates can vote for Clinton over Obama: the number of electoral votes Clinton has won in her primary/caucus wins vs. Obama. Both Evan Bayh and Ed Rendell tested out this talking point on Sunday shows.
 
"So far, Mrs. Clinton has won states with a total of 219 Electoral College votes, not counting Florida and Michigan, while Mr. Obama has won states with a total of 202 electoral votes." 
 
This is the only metric the Clinton campaign has come up with yet has her ahead: she's behind in popular vote, behind in delegates earned JUST through primaries and behind in pledged delegates.
 
Of course, keep in mind, two of Kerry's final primary victories in '04 which essentially drove everyone out of the race (though the candidates did fight through Wisconsin) was Virginia and Tennessee; Kerry didn't carry either state. The motivation to use this Electoral College talking point is yet another attempt by the Clinton camp to discount some of Obama's small-state victories because Obama's won nearly twice the number of states. If you recall, in '00, during the recount dispute, the Bush campaign made sure the country saw that county-by-county map from around the country which showed the country in a sea of red. Obama's victory map, right now, looks more impressive than Clinton's visually.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: The Bush 'tightrope'

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:36 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Post looks at the "tightrope" McCain is walking in regards to Pres. Bush. "Throughout a week-long trip that took him to more than a dozen meetings with leaders in five countries, McCain walked a fine line on Iraq and other issues as the all-but-certain Republican nominee confronted perhaps the central dilemma of his presidential campaign -- the question of what role Bush and the legacy of the past seven years will play in his campaign for the White House."
 
More: "At home, the answer may determine how well McCain succeeds in keeping his Republican base happy while also attracting the independents and Democrats he will need to win in November. And, win or lose, it will shape his image abroad, where a debate is already raging over whether a McCain presidency would be a de facto third term for the embattled incumbent." 
 
NYT's Harwood has some details of what McCain's spring is going to look like. "The visible part of Mr. Davis’s plan involves laying a sturdier foundation for Mr. McCain’s positive, but relatively shallow, public image. It starts in earnest on March 31 with a “Service for America” tour, intended to link the senator’s biography with his values and policy stances. Along the way, it will underscore life events that occurred in battleground states -- like Virginia, where Mr. McCain attended high school, and Florida, where he trained as a Navy pilot. He will address the dominant domestic issue with events in April promoting his economic agenda.
 
“Drawing attention amid the Clinton-Obama battle will not be easy. Mr. Davis counts on regional news media coverage from Mr. McCain’s travels and on the instinct for the spotlight of “the best earned-media candidate in history.”
 
“The campaign plans cable television advertising, but only a little, because Mr. McCain is demonstrably not the best candidate in history at raising money. The $12 million he collected in February was less than a quarter of the $55 million for Mr. Obama, of Illinois. To close that gap, the campaign has scheduled a dozen fund-raising events for the next week alone and promises a similar pace throughout the spring."
 
More: "Another priority is to bolster Mr. McCain’s campaign infrastructure, which has been skeletal since his 2007 fund-raising collapsed. His early triumph in the nominating process allowed him to install operatives at the Republican National Committee, who in tandem with White House political aides can help with strategic planning.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (13 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Addressing Wright on Easter

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:31 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Times looks at a fact that has been largely overlooked the last six weeks: the amount of outside special interest money that has benefited Obama, particularly unions like SEIU. 
 
Obama gave an interview with Philly radio talk show host Michael Smerconish that airs today. Obama, asked if he ever spoke with Rev. Wright about some of his controversial views, said, "I'll be honest with you, I didn't have that many conversations with him over the last year just because I've been so busy. I haven't been going to church. I wasn't hearing a lot of these comments. In fact, the ones that are most offensive are ones that I just never knew about until they were reported on.
 
"I had conversations with him in the past -- in fact from the day that I first met him -- about some of his views. But understand this, something else that I think has not gotten reported on enough, is despite these very offensive views, this guy has built one of the finest churches in Chicago. It's not some crackpot church. I mean, witness the fact that Bill Clinton invited him to the White House when he was having his personal crises.
 
"This is a pillar of the community and if you go there this Easter Sunday and you sat down in the pew, you'd think, 'Well this is just like any other church.' You got kids and little girls with bows in their hair and people dressed in their Sunday finest. They're talking about Jesus and the Resurrection.
 
"So I don't want to suggest that somehow this was...the loop that you've been seeing typified services all the time. But that's the danger of the YouTube era. It doesn't excuse what he said, but it is to just give it some perspective so people understand."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (73 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Spitzer: The man behind the fall?

Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:30 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Meet Roger Stone. A long time attack dog of Eliot Spitzer’s, “who boasts of being the sleaziest man in American politics” and who predicted Spitzer "wouldn't serve his full term."
 
“The comments didn't draw much attention at the time since Stone was a well-known enemy of Spitzer who worked for the governor's nemesis, Majority Leader Joe Bruno,” the New York Daily News reports. “Nobody knew that Stone had already tipped off the feds to Spitzer's high-priced hooker habit in a Nov. 19 letter to the FBI. It also cattily mentioned the governor's fetish for having sex with socks on. It's unclear whether the prosecutors knew anything about Spitzer's involvement in the Emperors Club VIP call girl ring when Stone wrote the letter.”

DiscussDiscuss (8 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Hagel critical of war, McCain

Posted: Sunday, March 23, 2008 8:33 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Abigail Williams and Frank Thorp
After telling the American public for the last month that he is stepping out of the mess of political life,  Sen. Chuck Hagel spent the morning telling those left in office how to clean up after he's gone.

Invoking the recent Gallup poll showing that 81% of the American public did not like the direction America was headed, Hagel called for a new consensus within the next administration and emphasized the need for a bi-partisan coalition no matter who takes the White House.

Referring to Sen. John McCain as a "good friend," Hagel continued to criticize the Republican presidential candidate's foreign policy platform, pointing to a financial toll of $12 billion to $15 billion a month for the Iraq war and a high casualty rate.

"We have lost 900 Americans since the surge began," Hagel said. "We are in a mess in Iraq. And the reality is we are going to have to deal with it."

Hagel was blunt but could offer no specifics on the troop levels needed in the present or future. He was however, quick to absolve himself from finding any solution.

"I don't intend to be in the government next year," he said. "I don't anticipate it, and I don't look forward to it."

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCarthy comparison, a 'laugh'?

Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 4:02 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
RALEIGH, NC -- The back-and-forth continues between Teams Obama and Clinton over the former president's comments in Charlotte yesterday, which some have interpreted as a swipe at Obama's patriotism.

Yesterday, Obama surrogate Gen. Tony McPeak decried Bill Clinton's remarks as echoes of Joe McCarthy's anti-Communist fear-mongering during the Red Scare.

That, said Clinton spokesman Phil Singer, is "an outrage that doesn't pass the laugh test."

In a statement issued this afternoon, Singer went on to say that McPeak was "willfully and deliberately distorting Bill Clinton's remarks" and accused the rival campaign of using the incident as a distraction from Obama's "recent political troubles."

Bill Clinton said in Charlotte yesterday that a general-election matchup between his wife and John McCain would represent "an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country, and people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

DiscussDiscuss (64 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: Hil to focus on NC

Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 11:09 AM by Chuck Todd

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
CARY, NC -- Call it "courting the 'old coot' vote."

After an afternoon of controversy sparked by comments made in Charlotte, NC, Bill Clinton stuck to lighter fare at a senior center in Cary, a well-to-do suburb of Raleigh.  

"I've become a nut with these crazy Sudoku puzzles!" he exclaimed to knowing chuckles from a crowded audience of not a few octogenarians.  Clinton went on to clarify that his affection for the addictive numerical mind-benders is derived from an article in the Journal of American Medicine claiming that "after 50,  if you do one crossword puzzle, one set of math problems or a sudoku puzzle a day you cut your chances of Alzheimers in half!"  

"Interesting, huh?"  he added brightly.   

The mature humor came at the same time the Clinton campaign issued a statement to clarify the former president's earlier remark that a matchup between McCain and Clinton would be one "between two people who love this country" without "all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics." A campaign spokesman says that the comment was meant to lament, not launch, attacks on rival candidates' patriotism.

Clinton also said in Cary that today's swing through the Tar Heel State marks "the beginning of what I hope will be many trips to North Carolina between now and your primary day."  He mentioned that his wife will be in the state "next week, and I think every week" until May 6th.

"This whole thing could come down to what you all decide to do in North Carolina," he said, prompting applause from Democrats who have had the chance to cast precious few decisive votes in a presidential primary during their long lifetimes.

DiscussDiscuss (83 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama in Oregon comfort zone

Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 10:43 AM by Chuck Todd

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
EUGENE, Ore. -- The crowd at the University of Oregon let Barack Obama off the hook Friday night, even though he bet against their team in the NCAA tournament.

"I'm glad I'm not an opposing team. This is what they call the pit," Obama said as he looked out over the crowd of 9000 "quacking" fans in Mac Court stadium.

"Alright ducks I know this is a tough night for you. But I tell you what, Illinois didn't even make the  NCAA this year," Obama said.

Oregon lost to Mississippi State last night, and Obama's bracket had chosen the Bulldogs to win over over the Ducks.

But there was no need for Obama to win over this crowd. Obama fans started lining up at 6am this morning. Garrett and Heather Bridgens, school teachers from nearby Cottage Grove, OR said their high school students had taken turns waiting in line all day.

Around 6000 people who couldn't get into the event waited in an overflow to see Obama and others thronged the sidewalks of the school in a long procession waving cheerfully at the motorcade as it passed by.

It was a good end to a difficult week. Obama bounded on stage to "The City of Blinding Light," a campaign staple that has been missing from the road lately as the campaign has tried to move away from rallies towards more sober town halls and message events.

Obama addressed the comments made by Reverend Jeremiah Wright by rwferencing the speech he gave in Philadelphia. He called the focus on it a "distraction" and promised the crowd thar "this time we will not be distracted. This time we will not be waylaid.'

Obama will wrap up his Oregon tour Saturday with a town hall in Medford.

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McPeak's sharp tongue stabs Bubba

Posted: Saturday, March 22, 2008 10:25 AM by Chuck Todd

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
SALEM, Ore. -- General Tony McPeak, a co-chair of the Obama campaign, and a former Chief of Staff of the United States Airforce in the Clinton Administration, President Clinton's comments on patriotic Americans Friday to Joe McCarthy.  

"I think it's horrible. I'm really disappointed because I worked for President Clinton, you know?" McPeak said when asked by reporters.

"We know Barack Obama don't we? Do we think Barack Obama loves America? Is this stupid or what?" he demanded of the press surrounding him.

"It sounds more like McCarthy. I grew up, I was going to college when Joe
McCarthy was accusing good Americans of being traitors, so I've had enough of it," he added.

Told that the Clinton campaign had tried to distance itself from Bill Clinton's comment, McPeak implied that the campaign had been down this road before with the former president.

"It's a use of language as a disguised insult.  We've seen this before, this
little clever spin that's put on stuff," he said.

"I have no idea what his intentions are but I'm disappointed in the statement. I think Bill Clinton is, or ought to be, better than that," McPeak concluded.

DiscussDiscuss (57 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Richardson: Clinton call got 'heated'

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 7:05 PM by Chuck Todd
Filed Under:


From NBC's Lee Cowan
PORTLAND -- Bill Richardson described the conversation he had with Hillary Clinton on his decision to endorse Barack Obama as "heated" in an exclusive with NBC Nightly News today.
 
Both Richardson and Obama shared the spotlight this afternoon at a press conference and later in a sit down interview with NBC's Lee Cowan. (Please insert link to NN spot)

Richardson described the conversation that he had with Clinton last night "tough."

"It was tough to make the call, but I did. It got a little heated. It got a little tense. But it was understood, and I'm proud of my decision."

He stressed that his decision to endorse Obama came a week before, but it was reinforced by the speech Obama gave on race last Tuesday. He cited his own racial background as a Hispanic to underscore why the speech was so significant.
CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (44 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Contractors in passport case I.D.'d

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 5:36 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Jim Popkin and Libby Leist
Two of the government contractors who allegedly took a peek at Sen. Barack Obama's passport records worked for a Virginia-based firm called Stanley, Inc., according to U.S. government officials with knowledge of the State Department passport controversy.

NBC News contacted a Stanley, Inc. spokeswoman this afternoon, and informed her that two sources had confirmed that employees at her firm were involved with the scandal. The spokeswoman would only comment: "We've been directed by the State Department to direct all media calls to them."

The government officials tell NBC News that Stanley Inc. fired the two workers. A worker at a second contracting company, not related to Stanley, Inc.,  also allegedly took a look at the Obama files and those belonging to Sen. John McCain. That person has been disciplined but not yet been fired, State Department officials say.

Stanley, Inc., is headquartered in Arlington, Va. and is employee-owned. The State Department awarded it a contract for $164 million in 2006. The contract calls for Stanley to print and mail millions of new U.S. passports.

One Stanley, Inc., contractor allegedly looked at Obama's passport records on January 9, and then a second Stanley employee allegedly took a peek at similar Obama records on February 21, the officials said. Stanley, Inc., fired both workers after the alleged security breaches were discovered.

According to its website: "Stanley has approximately 3,500 employees at more than 100 locations in the U.S. and worldwide. Stanley offers a full-spectrum systems integration portfolio of services, providing comprehensive solutions for all phases of a program, product, or business lifecycle to meet each customer's mission-critical requirements."

DiscussDiscuss (47 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain wraps up overseas trip in Paris

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 3:50 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Bethany Thomas
PARIS -- John McCain wrapped up his five-country swing to the Middle East and Europe by meeting with two familiar faces- one old and one new.  In London this morning, former Prime Minister Tony Blair and McCain had breakfast together at the swanky Mandarin Oriental hotel.  A quick photo-op for reporters before the official visit quickly became a reflection of McCain's recent travels.  On the friendship with Britain, McCain said, "What I've learned from our trip is that our alliance and our relationship is still strong. There are areas such as climate change, transparency of international financial institutions, Israeli-Palestinian peace process and others that we need to work with more closely together."

Throughout the entire week, McCain has been careful to distinguish this trip as a Congressional fact-finding mission that he's leading as the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee.  Nevertheless, questions on the election and McCain's candidacy have followed him and various world leaders at every country's stop.  This morning Mr. Blair tried to deflect the question, but when asked if he was interested in the race, he said, "I think there's great interest in the election everywhere."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (49 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Reading between Bill Clinton lines about Obama?

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 3:47 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann (see update)
CHARLOTTE, NC -- At a small VFW hall in Charlotte, NC, today, former president Bill Clinton contemplated a McCain/Clinton general election matchup, saying that it would one between "two people who loved this country" without "all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country," said the former president. "And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

In the wake of controversy over comments made by  Barack Obama's former minister, Clinton's comments could be seen as an effort to draw attention to the issue of patriotism in a state with a high population of veterans.

The former president made the comments to less than 80 audience members at an invite-only event focused on veterans issues.  The audience was subdued as Clinton gravely outlined a message of patriotism and honor for military service, The small sea of navy-blue VFW caps nodded along in agreement.

Take away ten of the cameras and fifty degrees Farenheit, and this could have been a John McCain event in Waterloo, Iowa, in November 2007.

The message was different, but the mood was much the same.

Update: Bill Clinton spokesperson Matt McKenna clarifies the former president's comment: "Actually, as is indicated by the quote itself, President Clinton was talking about the need to talk about issues, rather than falsely questioning any candidate's patriotism.

He was lamenting that these kind of distractions 'always seems to intrude' on political campaigns. This consistent with his criticism of the 'politics of personal destruction,' which dates back 16 years."

DiscussDiscuss (0 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama gives fiery speech after endorsement

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 1:50 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
PORTLAND -- After Richardson endorsed Obama this morning, hailing him as a "once in a lifetime leader," Obama gave one of the fieriest speeches he has delivered in weeks.

"It's not just a change in parties. It's not just putting forward a bunch of ten point plans. It's restoring a sense that this government is working for you and fighting for you and is of and by the United States of America," he said.
 
He and Richardson took the stage together, and they hugged twice, when Richardson turned to Obama to say he endorsed him for president and at the end of his speech.  The largely white audience in Portland, shouted, screamed and chanted "Yes We Can!" To which Richardson, who had sprinkled some Spanish into his speech, shouted back, "Si se puede! Si se puede!"

DiscussDiscuss (61 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Richardson: 'He appealed to the best in us'

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 1:39 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
In his remarks today, Bill Richardson specifically cited Obama's speech on race Tuesday as a reason for his endorsement.

"Earlier this week, an extraordinary American gave a historic speech. Senator Barack Obama addressed the issue of race with the eloquence and sincerity and decency and optimism we have come to expect of him," he said, according to his prepared remarks. "He did not seek to evade tough issues or to soothe us with comforting half-truths. Rather, he inspired us by reminding us of the awesome potential residing in our own responsibility."

VIDEO: New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson endorses Barack Obama for president before an enthusiastic crowd in Portland, Ore.

Richardson continued, "Senator Obama could have given a safer speech. He is, after all, well ahead in the delegate count for our party's nomination. He could have just waited for the controversy over the deplorable remarks of Reverend Wright to subside, as it surely would have. Instead, Senator Obama showed us once again what kind of leader he is. He spoke to us as adults... He appealed to the best in us."

"As a Hispanic, I was particularly touched by his words. I have been troubled by the demonization of immigrants--specifically Hispanics-- by too many in this country... Senator Obama has started a discussion in this country long overdue and rejects the politics of pitting race against race."

Click below for Richardson's full remarks....

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (56 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

There were three types of breaches

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 12:28 PM by Mark Murray

From MSNBC's David Shuster
Here's what we know so far:
(1) Fall 2007. A training exercise last fall involved somebody typing in Hillary Clinton's name... The person involved was not fired.
 
(2-a) January 9, 2008. A contractor looked at the passport file of Barack Obama. The supervisor felt it was a firing offense. The contractor was fired. But the immediate supervisor didn't notify officials outside office of consular affairs.
 
(2-b) February 21, 2008. Another contractor looked at Obama's passport file. Supervisor felt it was a firing offense. The contractor was fired. The immediate supervisor didn't notify officials outside office of consular affairs.
 
(3) March 14, 2008. A third contractor accessed Obama's passport file and McCain's passport file. Supervisor felt it was not a firing offense. The contractor suspended. The immediate supervisor didn't notify officials outside office of consular affairs.
 
Key questions: What made the Jan. 9 and Feb. 21 breaches of Obama more serious than the fall '07 breach of Clinton and the March 14 breaches of Obama/McCain?

DiscussDiscuss (48 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Passports for McCain, Clinton also breached

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 12:14 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Andrea Mitchell
NBC News has learned that McCain's passport file was also apparantly breached, and
we have confirmed that Sen. Clinton's was as well.

Secretary of State Rice called Clinton today to notify her that her passport file was breached in 2007.

Clinton's Senate office released this statement: "This morning, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice contacted Senator Clinton in order to inform her that the Senator's passport file was breached in 2007. The State Department will be briefing Senator Clinton's staff this afternoon to provide details about the recent unauthorized breaches of passport records. Senator Clinton will closely monitor the State Department's investigation into this and the other breaches of private passport information."

DiscussDiscuss (36 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

A word of caution

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:23 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Andrea Mitchell
In the story about passport breach, here's a word of caution before leaping to conclusions about the official in charge of management and consular affairs -- Maura Harty -- who had been appointed by Bill Clinton as ambassador to Paraguay.

Harty actually started out in the Reagan Administration and rose to become a special assistant to former Secretary of State George Shultz.

In addition, Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy started in 1973 during the Nixon Adminstration - when Henry Kissinger was Secretary of State.

They both rose through the ranks under both Republican and Democratic presidents.

I'd caution against assuming any particular connection to the Clintons unless we can establish that. They are not known to be particularly political. They will surely have to answer questions about management and competence, however.  

DiscussDiscuss (75 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Rice apologizes to Obama

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:00 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Libby Leist
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said this morning she has spoken to Obama today to express her regret over the unauthorized passport breaches. She did not know about it until yesterday and could not comment whether any laws were broken

"I told him that I was sorry, and I told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned somebody had looked into my passport," she said. "We are very concerned about this."

"We are going to do an investigation through the inspector general, who will get to the bottom of it to make certain nothing ... was going on"

VIDEO: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says she will launch a full investigation into the unauthorized inquiry into Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's passport file.

The State Department is in contact with Obama's office and will provide briefings. "None of us wants to have a circumstance in which any Americans passport file is looked at in an unauthorized way," Rice added.

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama camp trying to work the refs

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:50 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
With so much attention on the NCAA basketball tournament -- even among the presidential contenders -- the analogy is perhaps more apt than ever: After a week of tough press scrutiny, the Obama campaign is trying to work the refs to even out the coverage.

With the fresh speculation whether the Rev. Wright episode will hurt Obama's chances in the general election, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe held a conference call with reporters arguing that voters' concerns about Clinton's honesty and trustworthiness are damaging to her claims of electability.

"It will be next to impossible to win a general election if more than half the electorate doesn’t see you as trustworthy," Plouffe said, citing a Gallup poll showing that just 44% of Americans rate Clinton as honest and trustworthy, compared with 67% for McCain and 63% for Obama. "The American people will simply not elect someone they don’t see as honest and trustworthy."

He went on to cite examples in which he said Clinton was being dishonest: telling voters in Ohio that she was against NAFTA (when she attended White House-organized meetings on the trade accord), pushing for re-votes in Florida and Michigan (when she said earlier that those contests didn't count), and even saying Obama wasn't a Muslim "as far as I know" (when she knows well Obama is a Christian).

Also on the call, Obama adviser Greg Craig implored the press to scrutinize why Clinton's White House schedules didn't confirm her claims to foreign policy experience (on Rwanda, Yugoslavia, and Northern Ireland). "I think her claims, with respect to foreign policy, achievements are inflated." 

On its own conference call following the Obama one, the Clinton campaign charged that the Obama camp was "desperate to change the subject" after its tough week -- by disenfranchising voters in Michigan and Florida, peddling photos of Bill Clinton with Rev. Wright, and now attacking Clinton's character. "It is not a pretty sight," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said.

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: A bad week for everyone

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:13 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Mark Murray
*** A bad week for everyone: While it may be hard to compare weeks during this campaign, we imagine there haven’t been many that have been this bad for all three campaigns. It was an odd war of attrition, a contest of who had the LESS bad week. For McCain, it was his Shiite-Sunni gaffe, which allowed Democrats to have a field day criticizing his understanding of Iraq, as well as his commander-in-chief credentials. For Clinton, it was the failure to have re-votes in Florida and Michigan, which makes her path toward winning the Democratic much, much more difficult. But hands down, no one had a tougher week than Obama. Just look at the post-Rev. Wright/pre-race speech poll numbers that are still circulating; it's what makes the Clinton and McCain folks think their week went better than Obama’s did. That said, two developments that occurred last night -- the news that Bill Richardson is endorsing Obama and the breach of his passport records -- have changed the subject, at least in the short term. But we do have this question for the Obama campaign: Why did it leak that photo of Wright with Bill Clinton? Doesn’t that just give cable networks another excuse to run the video of Wright? How does that turn the page? It was an odd decision to say the least.

*** Richardson’s endorsement: When John Edwards made an appearance on Leno last night, we were bracing ourselves for a possible endorsement. We just didn’t know it would be coming from Bill Richardson, who will formally throw his support behind Obama at a campaign event today in Portland, OR. The endorsement isn’t too much of a surprise -- Richardson had been hinting his support for Obama for a while. Still, it’s significant for two reasons: 1) Richardson becomes the second Dem presidential contender to endorse Obama, while none has backed Clinton (Biden and Edwards are still neutral); and 2) Richardson specifically cited Obama’s speech on race as a reason for getting off the fence. “He asked us to rise above our racially divided past, and to seize the opportunity to carry forward the work of many patriots of all races, who struggled and died to bring us together,” he said in a letter to his supporters. “As a Hispanic, I was particularly touched by his words.” The Obama camp, though, has to be a bit disappointed the endorsement didn’t come before Texas. In fact, of the remaining contests, Puerto Rico is the only one left with a significant Hispanic population. Expect some bitterness from Clinton land on this one, in particular because many of them believe that without Bill Clinton appointing Richardson to two Cabinet posts, he wouldn't have had the experience that makes him a viable veep candidate. Of course, Richardson’s endorsement means another superdelegate for Obama, raising his overall delegate total (pledged and supers) to 1,626 vs. 1,506 for Clinton.

VIDEO: NBC's Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on Bill Richardson's endorsement of Barack Obama, and continuing talk of race in the presidential campaign. 

*** Breach: While the Richardson endorsement is certainly good news for the Obama campaign, it might actually get more of a political payoff from the news that three contract workers at the State Department had accessed his passport records. The reason? It allows the Obama camp to bash the Bush Administration and galvanize Democratic voters, who might think -- even if it’s not true -- that the Administration is engaged in dirty tricks. “Our government's duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement last night. “This is a serious matter that merits a complete investigation, and we demand to know who looked at Senator Obama's passport file, for what purpose, and why it took so long for them to reveal this security breach.” Déjà vu '92. It's likely a few idiotic rogue wannabe political consultants, but who knows what an investigation will turn up.

*** The downballot omission: Yesterday, Clinton chief strategist Mark Penn released a memo seizing on recent poll numbers showing Clinton’s improved standing versus Obama. He wrote, “Ultimately, this Democratic nominating process is meant to select the candidate who will: a) be the best president – the best commander-in-chief, steward of the economy, and exercise leadership; b) defeat John McCain; and c) promote and defend core Democratic principles such as universal health care. On all three fronts, Hillary is the best choice for the Democratic Party." But he left out this consideration: Who would be the best leader for the party when considering downballot races? As we’ve pointed out before, what has been good for the Clintons (winning two presidential elections), hasn’t always been good for the party (which lost control of Congress, state legislatures, and governorships while Clinton was president). Can Clinton’s campaign make the pitch to superdelegates that the party would benefit as a whole from a Clinton restoration? Remember, these superdelegates aren't going to worry about who will be the best president. Many of them will be thinking: Who will be the best nominee to keep me in power?

*** McCain's money woes? FEC reports are in for all three presidential candidates, and there are a few headlines. First, the presidential field combined has raised just short of $800 million since last year. That's a stunning figure; the remaining three candidates will pass a $1 billion BEFORE the conventions. Two, McCain raise slightly less money in February than he did in January. That's not a good sign. He can't afford to be raising $11-15 million a month; he needs to get that monthly average above $20 million, at a minimum. No doubt, the McCain folks expect to be outspent by their eventual Dem opponent, as both Obama and Clinton are raising money at an amazing clip. But McCain needs to keep the ratio to less than 2-to-1, and $11-15 million a month doesn't cut it.

*** Typical clumsiness? Obama's defense of his grandmother racial issues by calling her a "typical white person" has many folks up in arms, who rightly claim that if either Clinton or McCain had said the phrase "typical black person" in a similar, there would be a full-fledged media firestorm. Of course, had Obama said this pre-Rev. Wright, would anyone have cared? It shows where this campaign is right now and why Obama's walking a tightrope. Every word he says on race is being scrutinized. This was an odd thing to say and offensive to a number of folks. No doubt we'll hear an apology from Obama. He obviously didn't mean for how it came across but, well, words matter.

*** On the trail: Clinton is down in New York; McCain remains in England and then heads to France; and Obama campaigns all day in Oregon, visiting Portland, Corvallis, and Eugene. Also, Bill Clinton stumps in North Carolina.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 32 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 46 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 228 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 305 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.       

DiscussDiscuss (64 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: No do-overs...

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray

It's official: Florida and Michigan re-vote proposals are dead.

Politico's Smith notes that without the re-votes, the Clinton campaign's hope of catching Obama in the popular vote is diminishing. "In Pennsylvania, for instance, more than 1.2 million Democrats turned out for the last contested Democratic primary, the 2002 governor’s race. Given the higher interest, Democratic operatives there — who declined to be quoted speculating — said they could imagine the vote getting as high as 2 million. Under that, highly optimistic scenario, an unprecedented blowout for Clinton — a margin of 20 percent, for instance — would give her 400,000 more votes in the state, and still leave her with more than 300,000 to make up.”

“And few Pennsylvania Democrats actually expect such a result, despite Clinton’s lead in many state polls. Clinton’s convincing victory in Ohio, for instance — a whiter, more conservative state — was by a margin of 10 percent." More:  For Clinton to pick up her lead in the popular vote with 6 million ballots cast, she’d need a 12 percent margin across the states — that’s a 56 percent to 44 percent average win. With 5 million ballots, she would need a 14 percent margin — that’s a 57 percent to 43 percent overall victory, including expected defeats in states counting for well over 1 million votes.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The passport breach

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:11 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

This little passport imbroglio is just the type of distraction the Obama campaign was looking for, no? Here's the original Washington Times story on the incident: "Two State Department employees were fired recently and a third disciplined for improperly accessing electronic personal data on Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, Bush administration officials said today. The officials, all contract workers, used their authorized computer network access to look up files within the department's consular affairs section, which processes and stores passport information, and read Mr. Obama's passport application and other records, in violation of department privacy rules, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement: "This is an outrageous breach of security and privacy, even from an Administration that has shown little regard for either over the last eight years. Our government's duty is to protect the private information of the American people, not use it for political purposes. This is a serious matter that merits a complete investigation, and we demand to know who looked at Senator Obama's passport file, for what purpose, and why it took so long for them to reveal this security breach.”

Clinton spokesman Jay Carson added, "It is outrageous and the Bush Administration should get to the bottom of it."

Per NBC’s Libby Leist, A senior State Department official insisted there was "no political motivation" to these incidents. He says they were low-level contract employees doing administrative work and they accessed the Obama records out of "curiosity." This official doesn't believe any of this information was sent anywhere. The records were accessed on three different occasions by three separate individuals -- on January 9, February 21, and March 14. 

On conference call last night, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell adds, Patrick Kennedy of the State Department said there is no reason to think that the contract employees will not cooperate with the inspector general, even though they acknowledge that fired employees have no obligation to do so. The IG would have no legal authority over these fired contract employees. At this stage, Kennedy and spokesman Sean McCormick say they are not forwarding this to the Justice Department. Moreover, McCormick said he first learned about the incidents from a reporter's call yesterday -- not from an official internal report.

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: scrutinizing that experience

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:09 AM by Mark Murray

The Washington Post uses the release of Clinton's White House schedules to look at her experience claims. "On March 22, 1999, Hillary Rodham Clinton arrived at the Itihadiya Palace in Egypt for what her schedule said was a ‘courtesy call with President Mubarak.’ Aides blocked out 9 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. Then she embarked on visits to a mosque, museum, clinic, bazaar, youth center, groundwater project, university and the Temple of Luxor. Almost exactly nine years later to the day, Clinton's trip to Egypt offers a case study of her foreign policy role during her husband's presidency. While traveling across North Africa, she devoted little time to heads of state and negotiated no agreements, but instead met community leaders, explored local issues and culture, hit major tourist sites and gave speeches on women's rights and other topics important to her.”

“Whether that has made her ‘tested and ready’ to be president from the first day, as she now claims, is a burning issue on the campaign trail." More: "While Clinton's advertisements have boasted that she is best prepared for a 3 a.m. crisis phone call, the schedules contain no evidence that Clinton was at the table during major national security decisions. They do not list her as attending National Security Council meetings or joining briefings in the Situation Room. She did not have a national security clearance. And the documents make clear that at moments of major crisis, Clinton was often busy with her own agenda."

The Obama camp seized on the NAFTA campaigning Clinton did during her husband's push for the trade pact's passage in '93. The news was revealed in her White House schedules released on Wednesday.

The New York Times reports, "[T]his week, Mrs. Clinton’s electability argument has taken on a new dimension that for her and her advisers is both discomfiting and unpredictable, but also potentially helpful. Some Democrats are now looking at the racially incendiary and anti-American remarks of Mr. Obama’s longtime pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., and wondering if that association could weaken Mr. Obama as a nominee. Clinton advisers have asked their allies not to talk openly about the issue, for fear it could create a voter backlash and alienate black Democrats. They also say Mr. Obama, of Illinois, is in enough trouble over Mr. Wright that they do not need to foment more — and, besides, cable television is keeping the issue alive."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: More veep speculation

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:08 AM by Mark Murray

National Journal's Kirk Victor looks at the decision-making process behind McCain's veep search. "[F]airly or not, the decision assumes more importance than usual in McCain's case because he will be 72 on Inauguration Day ... and because he has had cancer... Folks on and off Capitol Hill also say that McCain, perhaps more than other recent nominees, has more competing considerations to weigh in selecting a running mate. They cite his famous maverick ways ... and his acknowledgement that economics is not his strong suit."

Karl Rove weighs in on the national security question for the campaign: "Elections are rarely decided over just one issue; to win, candidates don't need to have a majority of Americans agreeing with them on every big issue. But when it comes to choosing a president, Americans take seriously the candidates' views and experience on national security. Voters instinctively understand a president's principal constitutional responsibility is protecting the country.

The Democrats have two candidates with less national security experience and fewer credentials than the presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain. And they are compounding these difficulties with positions on Iraq and terrorist surveillance that are shared by a shrinking minority of Americans."

With McCain in France today, the liberal Campaign for America’s Future has released a video hitting McCain on the Airbus tanker deal.

DiscussDiscuss (5 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Watching NCAA hoops...

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:07 AM by Mark Murray

Richardson sent an email to supporters to explain his reasons for picking Obama. "Earlier this week, Senator Barack Obama gave an historic speech that addressed the issue of race with the eloquence, sincerity, and optimism we have come to expect of him. He inspired us by reminding us of the awesome potential residing in our own responsibility. He asked us to rise above our racially divided past, and to seize the opportunity to carry forward the work of many patriots of all races, who struggled and died to bring us together.”

“As a Hispanic, I was particularly touched by his words. I have been troubled by the demonization of immigrants--specifically Hispanics-- by too many in this country. Hate crimes against Hispanics are rising as a direct result and now, in tough economic times, people look for scapegoats and I fear that people will continue to exploit our racial differences--and place blame on others not like them. We all know the real culprit -- the disastrous economic policies of the Bush Administration!

“Senator Obama has started a discussion in this country long overdue and rejects the politics of pitting race against race. He understands clearly that only by bringing people together, only by bridging our differences can we all succeed together as Americans. His words are those of a courageous, thoughtful and inspiring leader, who understands that a house divided against itself cannot stand. And, after nearly eight years of George W. Bush, we desperately need such a leader.”

Per NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan, Obama often has been billed as the wine-drinking candidate, who’s unable to attract the working-class, beer-track voters that are the staple of the Democratic Party. It's no exaggeration to say that in a sports bar in Beckley, West Virginia yesterday Obama found the answer to winning over those regular Joes. Plopping down at a table with a group of men, he sat, talked, ate two chicken wings, and dissected the NCAA tournament. Why didn't Mississippi State make his final four pick? "They don't have good free throws," he explained. "Pittsburgh is hot," he declared, insisting that it had nothing to do with politics. He told the assembled crowd that he watched ESPN’s Sports Center to unwind. By the end of the visit, the bar patrons -- who had appeared more interested in the games playing on the multiple TV screens when he walked in -- applauded when he walked out.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (11 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Fundraising

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:06 AM by Mark Murray

Wow! The entire Dem and GOP presidential fields, since this campaign began, have collectively raised just under $800 million. This means, the remaining candidates will easily push that number over a $1 billion. Think about that: $1 billion dollars. Granted, the dollar isn't worth as much as it was four years ago, but wow. "Obama, the freshman Democratic senator from Illinois, reported raising $192.7 million and spending $154.7 million on his campaign through the end of February. He spent $42.7 million in February while competing in more than 30 nominating contests.”

“Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) was second in fundraising. She collected $34.6 million in February, pushing her total to $173.8 million. That includes $10 million from her Senate campaign account and a $5-million personal loan. Clinton owes consultants and other vendors an additional $3.7 million. The presumptive GOP nominee, John McCain, raised $11 million in February, his best month. Overall, the Arizona senator had raised $60.2 million, and spent $49 million through the end of February. McCain paid off much of his debt to consultants and other vendors. An aide to McCain said Thursday that McCain had raised more in the month of March than he did in any three-month period previously."

The New York Times notes McCain actually raised less in February than he did in January when he WASN'T yet the presumptive nominee.

McCain's $11 million haul has to become his fundraising floor. If he simply averages $11-15 million a month between now and November, he'll have a SERIOUS resource deficit compared to his eventual Dem foe. Can McCain start raising $20-25 million a month? We'll find out on April 20, when his March fundraising is released. March is the first OFFICIAL month he was raising cash as the presumptive nominee.

DiscussDiscuss (4 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

It's the economy...

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:04 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

The Los Angeles Times notes, "Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, who are running for president as economic populists, are benefiting handsomely from Wall Street donations, easily surpassing Republican John McCain in campaign contributions from the troubled financial services sector. It is part of a broader fundraising shift toward Democrats, compared to past campaigns when Republicans were the favorites of Wall Street.”

“Some Democrats worry that the influx of money will make their candidates less willing to call for increased regulation of financial markets, which have been in turmoil after a wave of foreclosures on sub-prime mortgages. These concerned Democrats argue that their candidates, and presumptive Republican nominee McCain, should be willing to push for financial institutions to accept more government regulation -- in exchange for likely future bailouts, such as the recent deal the Federal Reserve orchestrated for JPMorgan Chase & Co. to take over Bear Stearns Cos."

There are some folks who wonder if the Democrats in the '90s got talked into being "yes people" for Wall Street so that they didn't create an enemy in Wall Street that they had in the '70s and '80s. And that led to bipartisan lack of regulation of the money markets.

DiscussDiscuss (3 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Legitimacy of nominee at stake

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:45 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
TERRE HAUTE, IN -- Clinton kept the pressure on Obama for another day, urging him to sign on to a re-vote in Michigan and saying not re-doing primaries there and in Florida would call into question the legitimacy of the ultimate nominee.
  
"I went to Michigan yesterday because I feel so strongly that it is not in the best interests of our party or our chances for victory in November to deny the rights of the people of Florida and Michigan. I do not see how two of our largest and most significant states can be disenfranchised and left out of the process of picking our nominee without raising serious questions about the legitimacy of that nominee," she told reporters after a roundtable at a diner. "So again I would call on Sen. Obama to join me in supporting the rights of the people of Michigan and Florida to have their voices and their votes counted."

She said she would support finding a way to seat the two states' delegates regardless of the outcome. "I would be in favor of fixing this problem no matter what my position," she said. "I have been consistently in favor of it. Remember, I'm the one who kept my name on the ballot. I had no idea what the outcome would be. I did not run advertising in Florida. I abided by the rules and did not campaign in Florida. I didn't know what the outcome would be."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (268 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain in London

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:03 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
Continuing their trip through the Middle East and Europe, Sens. McCain, Lieberman, and Graham stopped in London today. At a press conference following a meeting with Prime Minister Gordon Brown, McCain said they discussed climate change, the world's economy, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
 
McCain continued to view his foreign policy gaffe in Jordan as simple "misspeak." Asked about Obama's comments yesterday that maybe this is why McCain voted to go to war with a country with no ties to Al Qaeda, McCain dismissed the notion.
 
"Well, we all misspeak from time to time, and I immediately corrected it," McCain told an international press corps outside No. 10 Downing Street. "Just as Sen. Obama said he was looking forward to meeting the President of Canada, we all misspeak from time to time."
 
"It's very clear that I have a lot of experience in Iraq and the situation," McCain continued. "It was my eighth visit there. We just move on."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (58 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama fills out his brackets

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:58 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan and NBC's Mark Murray
If there's one thing outside of politics that can steal a candidate's attention -- especially the hoops enthusiast Obama -- it's March Madness, which begins in the next hour or two.

Obama has his money on the University of North Carolina to win the NCAA tournament this year beating out UCLA in the final.

Image: Barack Obama's bracket picks

His top bracket picks include: UNC in the East, Kansas in the Midwest, Pittsburgh in the South, and UCLA in the West. Some of those picks don't seem to be by accident, at least according to our political eyes: UNC is the flagship university in North Carolina (which has its primary on May 6), Pittsburgh is in Pennsylvania (which goes on April 22); and Kansas is where his mother's family hailed from.

Obama is a huge basketball fan, and was even caught pondering over his bracket when sitting in an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper. He joked that he was focusing on what was "important."

Obama was the last person to submit his bracket to the friendly staff-only betting pool. (Entry was $10.) Hotline reported this morning that Obama spokesmen "Bill Burton and Dan Pfeiffer both have Georgetown in the championship, but UCLA winning. Speechwriter Jon Favreau and Ben Finkenbinder have Kansas. Strategist David Axelrod and policy dir Heather Higginbottom picked UNC."

Asked why he was taking so long filling out his own bracket, Obama said: "I'm taking this very seriously. It's a science."

Obama has been playing basketball since he was in high school. He regularly finds a way to sneak some court time in on the campaign trail, shooting hoops with secret service, staff and just yesterday the troops from Fort Bragg.

DiscussDiscuss (91 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: McCain represents a third Bush term

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:51 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
CHARLESTON, WV -- Obama declared that McCain would carry out a "third Bush term" in a speech that stressed that detrimental effects the Iraq war has had on the American economy.
 
"When you're spending over $50 to fill up your car because the price of oil is four times what it was before Iraq, you're paying a price for this war. When Iraq is costing each household about $100 a month, you're paying a price for this war," Obama told an invited crowd at the University of West Virginia in Charleston.
 
The speech followed one he gave yesterday in North Carolina, where Obama argued that the war had strategically damaged the United States. 
 
In today's speech, he hit McCain early and often in his speech, saying that his call to renew the Bush tax cuts during war time was irresponsible. "John McCain once opposed these tax cuts -- he rightly called them unfair and fiscally irresponsible. But now he has done an about face and wants to make them permanent, just like he wants a permanent occupation in Iraq. No matter what the costs, no matter what the consequences, John McCain seems determined to carry out a third Bush term," Obama said.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (76 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama camp goes after Clinton on NAFTA

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:11 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray and NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
Seizing on the release of a White House schedule showing Clinton at a 1993 NAFTA meeting, as well as a report suggesting that she praised the trade accord while there, the Obama campaign held a conference call arguing that Clinton hadn't been honest with voters.

Obama communications director Robert Gibbs noted that when campaigning in Ohio, Clinton told voters that she had been a critic of NAFTA. “How is that even possible, Sen. Clinton?” Gibbs added that the voters are owed not only an apology but an explanation for what the truth is.

Strategist David Axelrod chimed in, reminding reporters when Clinton wagged her finger in Ohio -- “Shame on you, Sen. Obama” -- over an Obama flier tying Clinton to NAFTA. Axelrod said she did that knowing she had been the featured speaker of White House-organized events talking up NAFTA. "This is a question of political character," Axelrod said

NAFTA was a defining issue in the race in Ohio, and despite wide opposition to the trade deal, Clinton managed to win handily in the state by presenting herself as a staunch advocate against it and for calling on a moratorium on all trade deals if she becomes president. Her campaign also seized on news that an Obama economic adviser had told Canadians that Obama's opposition to the trade accord was political positioning -- which the Clinton campaign once again pointed to when responding to the conference call.

"Instead of attacking Senator Clinton, Senator Obama should explain to the American people why his top economic policy advisor was telling the Canadians that his promise to fix NAFTA shouldn’t be taken seriously," Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said in an email. "The fact is that independent accounts make clear that Senator Clinton did not support NAFTA and that she is the candidate Americans can trust to fix it."

DiscussDiscuss (93 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain also picks UNC

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 12:11 PM by Mark Murray

From MSNBC's Adam Verdugo
McCain has also released his NCAA brackets. His Final Four picks: UNC, Kansas, Memphis, and UConn.

His championship game is UNC vs. UConn, and -- like Obama did -- he has UNC winning the game.

Also worth noting: McCain picked 10-seed Arizona over 7-seed West Virginia in the first round. But he has his home state Wildcats losing to Duke in the second round.

DiscussDiscuss (54 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Libby disbarred

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:30 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Pete Williams
The Washington, DC local court of appeals today formally disbarred Scooter Libby, Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff.  

In a brief order, the court said the local bar association had investigated Libby's conviction and determined the crimes of which he was found guilty, including obstruction of justice and perjury, are crimes of "moral turpitude."

"When a member of the Bar is convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude,
disbarment is mandatory," the court said today.

DiscussDiscuss (24 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

New Penn memo: 'The shift to Hillary'

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:05 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
The latest campaign missive from Clinton chief strategist Mark Penn...

To: Interested Parties
From: Mark Penn, Chief Strategist
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008
Re: Polling Memo – The Shift to Hillary

There are some pretty big changes happening out there with the voters. Barack Obama recently declared himself the frontrunner in the race, although there are 10 contests remaining and MI and FL have not yet been decided. But a look at the polls shows that Sen. Obama’s lead nationally with Democrats has been evaporating. The Gallup daily tracking poll shows Hillary leading Sen. Obama among Democrats by 7 points, and the latest Zogby/Reuters poll has Sen. Obama’s lead down from 14 points last month to just 3 points now. This suggests a strong swing in momentum in the race to Hillary since the Texas and Ohio primaries earlier this month.

The more that the voters learn about Barack Obama, the more his ability to beat John McCain is declining compared to Hillary. For a long time we have explained that poll numbers for a candidate who has not yet been vetted or tested are not firm numbers, and we are beginning to see that clearly. Just a month ago, the Obama campaign claimed that the polls showed Barack Obama doing better than Hillary against Sen. McCain. Now such numbers are a lot harder to find.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (58 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: The new math

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:25 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Mark Murray
*** The new math: With Florida and Michigan re-dos all but dead, the Obama folks have successfully kept the delegate path very narrow for Clinton. As the New York Times’ Nagourney front-pages, “Without new votes in Florida and Michigan, it will be that much more difficult for Mrs. Clinton to achieve a majority in the total popular vote in the primary season, narrow Mr. Obama’s lead among pledged delegates or build a new wave of momentum.” By the way, did the Clinton campaign err in sending the candidate to Michigan yesterday? Some supporters of the re-do in that state believe that her visit to the state -- combined with the public release of the Clinton sugar daddies who promised to pony up $12 million -- spooked some undecided lawmakers who were queasy about the prospect of the re-do looking like a totally Clinton-funded event. And as it turned out, Clinton was in Michigan pushing process, while Obama was having a debate with McCain about Iraq. It's a rare day that Team Clinton took their eye off the message ball. But doesn't that underscore the need they have for this Michigan re-vote -- that they were willing to cede the Iraq anniversary to Obama and McCain? One other question: Does anyone think that one of the many reasons Obama has shown hesitancy to endorse a full revote in Michigan has to do with the controversy surrounding Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick? Does Obama really want to have to find ways to avoid being seen with Kilpatrick during a campaign in the state? The last thing Obama needs is to be drawn into some controversy that may appear divisive on the race front.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on Barack Obama's pastor problem and latest polls showing him losing ground to Hillary Clinton.

*** Is it safe? It's been a week since Rev. Wright became a household name and his sermons became discussion at the water cooler. Should the Obama campaign take heart in the fact that no new controversial sermons have become public? One would assume a slew of journalists have been scouring his sermons for more crazy statements and simply haven't found any ... yet? On the flip side, who else besides the Los Angeles Times yesterday and Nicholas Kristof today has attempted to look at Wright in a positive light (who he is, what he stands for, why he had thousands of parishioners including Obama, etc)? Of course, Wright's words are going to live, the "Is Obama Wright" YouTube continues to make the rounds and it's a taste of how the patriotism card could be used against Obama in a general.  and

*** Redacted! So how scrubbed were those Hillary Clinton schedules? Scrubbed enough that the names of David "redacted" Kendall and Bob "redacted" Bennett apparently never appeared on them. As expected, the schedules didn’t reveal that much. If anything, they only served as a tool to distract a lot of media to comb through them to find, well, nothing other than to attempt to recreate salacious days during some of the more dramatic moments of the Clinton years. The collective press corps now eagerly awaits those tax returns. When they’re released, will Yucaipa become a household name?  Of course, the release of these schedules gives the appearance of transparency, even though there was a lot that was redacted. This could turn out to be a helpful talking point for the Clinton campaign as they fight this message meme that they aren't being transparent about their post-presidency income and the Clinton library donations.

*** A Clinton-McCain alliance? Yesterday, while campaigning in Allentown, Bill Clinton praised McCain, NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli reports. "He paid as high a price as you can pay to serve this country without getting killed, and we have to honor that," Clinton said. "[And] he has some redeeming qualities for a Republican: he doesn't believe in torture, he supported campaign finance reform and he doesn't think global warming is a myth… So it is not gonna be all that easy to beat him." Of course, Obama has also praised McCain and his service. But Clinton’s praise came on the very day -- the fifth anniversary of the Iraq war -- in which the Obama and McCain camps were trading barbs over the Iraq war. So in that context, it was fascinating that Clinton would be so effusive in his praise. Meanwhile, McCain's been similarly deferential to Clinton, but not so much to Obama. In fact, the tone of the Mark Salter’s attack release yesterday is a reminder to some that there really is no love lost between Team McCain and Team Obama. There is a lot more contempt for Obama with McCain folks than there is for Clinton.

*** Another GOP retirement: First Read has learned that New York Rep. Tom Reynolds (R) -- who chaired the National Republican Congressional Committee in the ’04 and ’06 cycles, and who was once thought of as a possible successor to then-Speaker Denny Hastert -- is retiring. Reynolds narrowly held onto his seat in 2006, after he got caught up in the controversy over Mark Foley. Democrats are optimistic about their chances in his New York district, but it’s still fairly Republican; Bush got 55% of the vote there in 2004. But it’s yet another GOP retirement. By the way, what kind of message is being sent to the House Republicans that the last TWO NRCC chairs (Reynolds and Virginia's Tom Davis) have both decided to get out?

*** London calling: McCain’s taxpayer-financed overseas trip has taken him to Iraq, Jordan, and Israel. And today it takes him to London, where -- among other things -- he holds a fundraiser for his campaign. (His campaign is covering the costs for the fundraiser, which only US citizens can attend.) It's another sign, by the way, of the growing importance of overseas donors, since globalization has moved a lot of US citizens around the world, especially London. Also, don't miss another Lieberman-save for McCain on a potential Jewish holiday faux pas over Purim. Lieberman is turning into McCain's overseas MVP.

*** Here’s … an endorsement? Edwards is on Leno tonight. Will he hint at his endorsement? Unlikely. We're just shocked he'd schedule anything on the first day of the NCAA tourney. Come on, John, we thought you were more of a hoops fan than THAT! Jay can wait -- it's the most important hoops day of the year! In fairness, however, Edwards’ Tar Heels don’t play until tomorrow night… And speaking of, a memo to the campaigns: Please don’t hold any conference calls, etc. past noon, except perhaps during the 5:00 pm-to-7:00 pm window. We can all take a slight break these next two days, right?

*** On the trail: Clinton stumps in Indiana, making stops in Terre Haute, Anderson, and Evansville. Obama, meanwhile, gives his third big speech in three days -- this one from Charleston, WV on Iraq and its impact on the US economy. Afterwards, he campaigns in Beckley, WV before heading to Oregon.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 33 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 47 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 229 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 306 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.   

DiscussDiscuss (81 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: The narrow path

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:13 AM by Mark Murray

The New York Times’ Nagourney has CW-setting expectations for Clinton and her fight for the nomination now that FL and MI are essentially dead:
1) "She has to defeat Mr. Obama soundly in Pennsylvania next month to buttress her argument that she holds an advantage in big general election states."
2) "She needs to lead in the total popular vote after the primaries end in June."
3) "And Mrs. Clinton is looking for some development to shake confidence in Mr. Obama so that superdelegates."

More: "Clinton’s advisers had hoped that the uproar over inflammatory remarks made by Mr. Obama’s longtime pastor that has rocked his campaign for a week might lead voters and superdelegates to question whether they really know enough about Mr. Obama to back him. Although it is still early to judge his success, the speech Mr. Obama delivered on race in Philadelphia to address the controversy was well received and praised even by some Clinton supporters."

And: "Clinton’s advisers said they had spent recent days making the case to wavering superdelegates that Mr. Obama’s association with Mr. Wright would doom their party in the general election. That argument could be Mrs. Clinton’s last hope for winning this contest."

So will the Clinton campaign be walking a fine line using Wright to make the case to superdelegates? Or does it make some of these undecided supers uncomfortable that the Clinton campaign is using it?

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (34 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Looking ahead: Clinton still up in PA

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:09 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

Clinton’s lead keeps growing. A new Philadelphia Daily News/Franklin & Marshall poll has Clinton leading by 16 points, 51% to 35% among likely voters. The new poll results come from Hillary “aggressively courting votes” in the state, says poll director G. Terry Madonna. "She's been in every region of the state, speaking to large and enthusiastic crowds, and Obama has really not put on a full-court press here," Madonna said. 
 
Notes NBC/NJ's Matthew Berger: The poll was taken at a low point for Obama, amid the Wright controversy and before his well-received speech. But it shows Obama losing supporters he had a month ago, and finds that about one in five of each candidate’s backers said they would vote for McCain if the other person won the Democratic nomination.
 
Sen. Bob Casey is staying out of the Democratic race. Two theories have emerged as to why.

DiscussDiscuss (27 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Scrutiny vs. transparency

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:08 AM by Mark Murray

The Washington Post's Libby Copeland on the release of the Clinton schedules: "As a matter of fact, there's a difference between being transparent and being scrutinized. Clinton is one of the most studied figures in public life, but she's also one of the most opaque. This is why the release of these documents seems like much more of the same. Just paper. We know what she did on any particular day -- we might even know where she stood -- but not what she felt. Not what she said to her husband, the president. Not what she thought about it all.”

“All mechanics. On Dec. 19, 1998, the day Bill Clinton was impeached by the House, Hillary Clinton's schedule made no mention of the fact that she and her husband would take to the South Lawn to criticize the vote and to vow to stay in office. It noted that she visited the House Democratic Caucus in the morning but not that she told members there that she loved her husband."

The Los Angeles Times’ coverage of the schedules is headlined: "Hillary Clinton's schedules shed little light on work as first lady." The article notes this phenomenon: "Over time, Clinton's schedules offer less and less information. In 1993, her first year as first lady, the records include the names of people she met with. But federal archivists blotted out those names, citing privacy issues. In spring 1994, Clinton's schedulers appear to have stopped including names -- so her days are filled with one ‘private meeting’ after another, with no mention of whom she met with or why.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (19 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Purim = Halloween?

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:07 AM by Mark Murray

When McCain made a foreign policy gaffe in Jordan on Tuesday, it was Sen. Joe Lieberman who quietly pointed out the mistake, giving McCain an opportunity to correct himself in front of the international press corps. In Israel yesterday, NBC’s Lauren Appelbaum reports, Lieberman once again intervened when McCain made an incorrect reference about the Jewish holiday Purim -- by calling the holiday "their version of Halloween here."
 
McCain made the incorrect statement during a press conference with Defense Minister Ehud Barak after touring the Israeli city of Sderot to view buildings damaged by Hamas rocket fire. McCain was discussing the numerous rock attacks on the city. "Nine hundred rocket attacks in less than three months, an average of one every one to two hours. Obviously this puts an enormous and hard to understand strain on the people here, especially the children. As they celebrate their version of Halloween here, they are somewhere close to a 15-second warning, which is the amount of time they have from the time the rocket is launched to get to safety. That's not a way for people to live obviously."
 
Purim is not the equivalent of an Israeli Halloween, Appelbaum notes. The holiday -- although a joyous one -- commemorates a time when the Jewish people living in Persia were saved from mass execution. When Sen. Lieberman had a chance to speak at the press conference, he placed the blame of the mistake on himself. "I had a brief exchange with one of the mothers whose children was in there in a costume for Purim," Lieberman, who is Jewish and celebrates the holiday, said. "And it's my fault that I said to Senator McCain that this is the Israeli version of Halloween. It is in the sense because the kids dress up and it's a very happy holiday and actually it is in the sense that the sweets are very important of both holidays."
 
"Could I just say that I understand this is the holiday of Hadassah, otherwise known as Esther," McCain later said. Those in attendance quickly made light of the mistake.
 
McCain’s mistake wasn’t a big deal. But what is interesting, Appelbaum points out, is Lieberman's role during this trip. In two days, Lieberman has intervened twice in front of the press -- once helping McCain with a correction on Sunnis/Shiites and once putting the blame on himself regarding the description of Purim.

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: How much damage was done?

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:05 AM by Mark Murray

The Washington Post's Dan Balz points out an important fact about this campaign in his lead:  "The pattern in Campaign 2008 is that nothing lasts; nothing has a shelf life of more than half a day. Cable and the Internet simply churn information too quickly. In this age of the continuous news cycle, the new pushes out the old regardless of significance or importance."

Also in his piece is this important point: “Democratic strategists see the dangers ahead for Obama. While not lethal to his hopes of winning the Democratic nomination or the presidency, they say, the damage could be lasting. ‘This has tarnished Obama's image, though certainly not in a fatal way, and we will see it used by the GOP repeatedly if he is the nominee,’ one strategist said in an e-mail on Wednesday. ‘At the end of the day, I believe whoever the Democratic nominee is will win, but those who think that, if Obama is the nominee, he won't have Clinton-like negatives by Election Day are naive. This whole episode underlines that point.’”

Bottom line: Obama can't make the case anymore that he expands the map in the fall; he just has a different path to 270 than Clinton -- but it's just as narrow. Trade Ohio (20 EVs) with the combination of Colorado/Virginia (21 EVs).

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Iraq politics: 'So?'

Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:04 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

Obama and McCain exchanged words yesterday on Iraq while Clinton was in Michigan pushing for a revote.

The Chicago Tribune: “Sen. Barack Obama mocked rivals Sen. John McCain and Sen. Hillary Clinton as he delivered a speech here today highlighting his early opposition to the Iraq war on the fifth anniversary of the conflict’s start.”

Per the Washington Post, “President Bush sought yesterday to convince a skeptical public that the United States is on the cusp of winning the war in Iraq, arguing in a speech at the Pentagon that the recent buildup of U.S. forces has stabilized that country and ‘opened the door to a major strategic victory in the war on terror.’ Vice President Cheney said separately that it does not matter whether the public supports a continued U.S. presence in Iraq, and he likened Bush's leadership to that of Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War.”

“After a reporter cited polls showing that two-thirds of Americans oppose the Iraq war, Cheney responded: ‘So?’”

DiscussDiscuss (21 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill praises McCain, calls him tough to beat

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:52 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
ALLENTOWN, PA -- Bill Clinton, who earlier today criticized McCain over the US presence in Iraq, praised the likely Republican nominee at a local college, saying he's a "very fine man" who'll be tough to beat.

"He paid as high a price as you can pay to serve this country without getting killed, and we have to honor that," Clinton said. "[And] he has some redeeming qualities for a Republican: he doesn't believe in toture, he supported campaign finance reform and he doesn't think global warming is a myth... So it is not gonna be all that easy to beat him."

He made the case that it's Hillary who would best match up against the Arizona senator, specifically mentioning her support in the military community.

Clinton also mentioned the endorsement yesterday of Pennsylvania Rep. Jack Murtha, whom he said was "one of the most prominent opponents of the Iraq war." "He said she would be the best commander-in-chief, the best person to bring our troops home from Iraq," Clinton said.

The former president, who has frequented high school gyms of late, drew one of the largest crowds in recent weeks at the Muhlenberg College basketball arena. And before the largely student crowd, he highlighted his wife's plan to forgive some student loan debt in return for public service.

DiscussDiscuss (104 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

More on those Clinton schedules...

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:46 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Jim Popkin
Hillary Clinton's calendar entries are full of unexplained private meetings on key dates when she and President Clinton were fending off a variety of scandals, the newly released White House records show.

Take Jan. 21, 1998. That's the day when most Americans first learned, courtesy of the Washington Post, that President Clinton had had a relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Mrs. Clinton's calendar entry shows that she left the White House at 7:25 pm that evening and returned 25 minutes later. The National Archives, which released the 17,484 calendar pages today, has excised the reason for the brief trip and the names of any of the people whom Mrs. Clinton may have met. The Archives, working in consultation with President Clinton's representatives, cite privacy concerns in blacking out all details of the trip.

Dec. 22, 2000 also remains a bit of a mystery. That's the day when Mrs. Clinton and the President met in the White House with a New York rabbi who successfully lobbied President Clinton to commute the sentences of four Hassidic men who had been convicted of massive fraud and conspiracy. The commutations were extremely controversial at the time, and photos of the meeting exist. And yet, there's no mention of it in Mrs. Clinton's daily log. The calendar simply lists four separate "private meetings" in the Map Room that day, with no names attached.

On Jan. 4, 1996, the calendars also record four "private" meetings that the First Lady held with her chief of staff, Maggie Williams, and undisclosed others. That's the same day that one of the First Lady's aides discovered a stack of Mrs. Clinton's law-firm billing records in the private quarters of the White House. Whitewater investigators had been searching for the subpoenaed documents for months. 

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Down the ballot

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:31 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: , ,

From NBC's Chuck Todd
So far, we haven't seen any indie expenditure groups pop up to attack Clinton or Obama  from the right, but here's early evidence of some GOP money starting to flow into indie groups to help prop up key Senate and House Republicans.

This ad praises Minnesota's Norm Coleman (R) who faces a VERY expensive fight with Al Franken (D).

DiscussDiscuss (25 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

'NAFTA briefing drop-by'

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:14 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
With a hat tip to the Politico's Ben Smith, will this end up being the biggest news from the release of Clinton's White House schedules? The AP writes: "She was also involved in helping her husband win congressional approval of the North American Free Trade Agreement, a deal she now criticizes and says she would try to change."

Here's the entry from the schedule on November 10, 1993:
NAFTA BRIEFING DROP-BY
Room.450, OEOB
CLOSED PRESS
PARTICIPANTS: Approx. 120 expected to attend (See briefing book for further info]
FORMAT:
- Alexis Herman intros HRC for brief remarks
- HRC concludes program
Staff Contact: Doris Matsui

DiscussDiscuss (101 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill touts Hillary's electability

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:51 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
BETHLEHEM, PA -- Bill Clinton told voters in Northeastern Pennsylvania today that his wife is the only Democratic candidate "who can stack up against Sen. McCain on the national security issues," and that a victory in this state could pave the way to her winning the nomination.

Also, on the anniversary of the start of the Iraq war, he also faced off with a heckler who claimed he had "gutted" the military as president.

Clinton was actually talking about an area where he said his wife is more conservative than President Bush -- the budget -- and he cited his own policies in his Administration. “It is true that when I was president we had four surpluses in a row for the first time in 70 years,” he said.

At that point, a man in the back of the room began shouting out at the former president, saying he “gutted the military” in office, and “showed disgust for the military. The crowd quickly drowned him out with boos, as Clinton offered a tongue-in-cheek rejoinder.

“Yeah, I gutted the military,” he said. “That’s why two former chairmen of the joint chiefs of staff are for Hillary. That’s why 34 generals and admirals are for Hillary.” Turning serious, he continued: “In every respect, military readiness was greater when I left office than it is today. The Republicans gutted the military.”

And before returning to fiscal issues, he offered a clue that he’s seen this kind of feedback before from a crowd. “You know, whenever you find somebody screaming it’s normally because they don’t have the facts on their side,” he said.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain camp fires back at Obama

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:20 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC's Mark Murray
McCain senior adviser Mark Salter just released this statement regarding the Iraq speech Obama gave earlier in the day. If this biting statement by Salter -- often viewed as McCain's alter ego -- is any indication, an Obama-McCain general election might be as contentious as the Obama-Clinton primary has been.

"Senator Obama says that ending the war will not be easy, that 'there will be dangers involved.' Yet, in that patented way of his, he declines to name those dangers. Let me enumerate a few: al Qaeda, which is now on the run, will survive, claim victory and continue to provoke sectarian tensions that, while they have been subdued by the 'tactics' of the surge, still exist and are ripe for provocation by al Qaeda, which would almost certainly ignite again civil war in Iraq, a civil war that could easily descend into genocide. To say that invading Iraq was used as a recruiting tool for al Qaeda is one thing. To pretend that our defeat there won't provide an even bigger one is foolish supposition. Iran, which trains Shia extremists and is known to arm and equip Sunni extremists, a fact Senator Obama is apparently unaware of, will also view our premature withdrawal as a victory, as will other countries in the region, and the biggest state supporter of terrorists, a country with nuclear ambitions and a stated desire to destroy the State of Israel, will see its influence in the Middle East grow significantly. These are some of 'dangers,' that our premature withdrawal from Iraq will engender, and they all have the potential to destabilize the entire region. A realistic plan to prevent them from occurring is what people with experience in statecraft call 'strategy,' something Senator Obama has not offered yet.

"Senator Obama, as has also become a habit of his 'new politics,' mischaracterizes John McCain's position by saying McCain did not want to reduce troops because the violence in Iraq was too high, and now do not wish to do so because the violence in down. The reason violence is down is because General Petraeus' counterinsurgency is, which even Senator Obama recognizes, succeeding.  Those 'tactics,' are advancing our 'strategy.' Deprive General Petraeus of the resources and manpower to employ those tactics, or worse, leave Iraq altogether, and our strategy will collapse. That is national security 101. John McCain wants American forces to come home when our clear and serious interests at stake in Iraq, which nearly 4,000 Americans have given their lives to secure, are truly safe, when al Qaeda is defeated; Iran's influence is contained, and the potential for a truly cataclysmic civil war in Iraq is remote.  That, I think, is what is called 'making us safer.' Senator Obama's plan, if it can be charitably described as one, would do the reverse."

*** UPDATE *** Obama spokesman Bill Burton responds, “We wish the McCain campaign well as they try to figure out the difference between Iran and al Qaeda. Yesterday, Senator McCain said that Iran is “taking al Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back,” to Iraq. This was shortly after telling talk radio host Hugh Hewitt, “As you know, there are al Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they’re moving back into Iraq.” Or does Senator McCain believe the clarification that he issued yesterday, “I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al Qaeda.” Or does he believe the statement that he issued today: “Al Qaeda and Shia extremists -- with support from external powers such as Iran -- are on the run but not defeated." Huh?"

More: “This fall, John McCain will support George Bush Foreign Policy 101: endless war in Iraq; a policy of not talking to adversaries that has not worked; and a disturbing tendency to conflate very different threats. Barack Obama will offer a clean break from the failed policies of the past. He will end the war in Iraq, finish the job in Afghanistan, and focus on the threats of the 21st century.”

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton calls on Obama to accept MI re-vote

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:30 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones and NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
DETROIT -- Clinton today stepped up the pressure on Obama to back a re-vote in Michigan, calling it a crucial test of whether he means what he says or not.

"Sen. Obama speaks passionately on the campaign trail about empowering the American people. Today, I'm asking him to match those words with actions to make sure the people of Michigan and Florida have a voice and a vote in this election," she told local members of the AFSCME union, which has endorsed her. "I have accepted the plan for a new vote in Michigan, proposed in draft legislation and approved by the Democratic National Committee. In fact the DNC put out a statement earlier this morning making clear that the proposal fits within the DNC rules. It is fully within the party's rules. I call on Sen. Obama to do the same."

Clinton said 600,000 voters in Michigan and 1.7 million Florida voters were at risk of being shut out of the Democratic process. "I think that's wrong and frankly it is un-American and we cannot let that continue," she said. "This goes way beyond this election and it goes way beyond who's running, because no matter where you were born or how much money you were born into, no matter where you worship or the color of your skin, it is a bedrock American principle that we are all equal in the voting booth."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (87 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: McCain will beat Hillary on experience

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:12 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
FAYETTEVILLE, NC -- On the fifth anniversary of the Iraq war, Obama renewed his argument that those with long-term experience in Washington lacked the wisdom to properly bring the war to an end and claimed that Democrats could not win in November if they ran on claims of experience against McCain.

Pointing to Clinton's argument that both she and McCain had passed the "commander-in-chief test," Obama argued that the argument was more focused on years spent in Washington than it was on the judgments made in those years.

"There is a security gap in this country -- a gap between the rhetoric of those who claim to be tough on national security, and the reality of growing insecurity caused by their decisions. A gap between Washington experience, and the wisdom of Washington's judgments. A gap between the rhetoric of those who tout their support for our troops, and the overburdened state of our military," he said.

Obama targeted as many of his remarks against McCain as he did Clinton, a tacit acknowledgment that an overriding concern for Democrats is who is best able to beat the Republican nominee in November. Obama openly said that Clinton's emphasis on experience as an overriding factor in choosing a president would lead Democrats to failure.

"It is time to have a debate with John McCain about the future of our national security. And the way to win that debate is not to compete with John McCain over who has more experience in Washington, because that's a contest that he'll win," he said.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (70 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The DNC weighs in on Michigan

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:40 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC's Mark Murray
DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee co-chairs Alexis Herman and James Roosevelt issued the following memo to members of the committee:

"We have recently been asked whether the legislation as proposed by Michigan would fit within the framework of the National Party’s Delegate Selection Rules. Our review of this legislation indicates that it would, in fact, fit within the framework of the Rules if, it were, passed by the state legislature and used by the Michigan State Democratic Party as the basis of drafting a formal Delegate Selection Plan. If a formal Delegate Selection Plan is received we will convene a meeting of the RBC to consider such a Plan."

DiscussDiscuss (145 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The Clinton camp's rebuttal

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:32 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
Here's the Clinton campaign's memo arguing that Obama is holding up a re-vote in Michigan: "On February 8, 2008, Barack Obama stood in the aisle of his airplane and told reporters that he would be 'fine' with a new primary in Michigan if it could be done in a way that gave him and Senator Clinton time to make their respective cases and the DNC signed off.  Since then, such a plan has garnered broad support from top Michigan lawmakers and the DNC has given its blessing.

"So Barack Obama is on board, right? Guess again. It turns out that his comments about being fine with a re-vote if the above conditions were met were just words."

Below is the entire memo...

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (158 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The Obama campaign's argument on Michigan

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:26 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
The Obama campaign just released a memo from top lawyer Bob Bauer, which contains concerns about the re-vote plan in Michigan -- the chief one being that Republicans, independents, and even Democrats who voted in the January 15 GOP primary would be disqualified from participating in the do-over.

Bauer writes, "Since any Republican or independent who did not vote in January in the Republican primary is fully free to participate in the June primary, the effect of the proposal is to enfranchise a class of Republicans while disenfranchising a class of Democrats—the ones who chose to vote in the Republican primary when they correctly understood that the Democratic contest was meaningless."

Below is the entire memo...

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (70 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Running out the clock?

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:19 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Mark Murray
*** Running out the clock? It appears the Michigan re-vote legislation is hanging by a thread. Clinton is traveling to the state today to try and bring more attention to the fact that it isn't her campaign that is standing in the way of re-vote. Her desire to make this case is obvious: Clinton needs these do-over contests in Florida and Michigan -- and needs to win them by big margins -- to convince superdelegates that she should be the nominee. The question is: Will primary voters in other states care about this issue? (Or will they see this as pure politics, given the fact that Clinton never spoke up about Michigan and Florida until right before the South Carolina primary?) The Obama campaign appears to be gambling that they won't. After all, no matter how long you’ve served in the Senate, you know this one truism about American politics: It’s always easier to do nothing. This is good politics for Clinton if there is a re-vote or if she's the nominee, because while Florida is a battleground in the general, Dems have a path to 270 electoral votes without it. Michigan, on the other hand, is an absolute electoral vote necessisity for the Dems. This is TRULY the big Obama gamble; killing the Michigan revote may expedite his path to the Dem nomination, but he's got real work to do if he’s the nominee. By the way, by going to Michigan today, isn't Clinton sending the message that without a re-vote, her chances at the nomination are much more remote?

*** The known and unknown about Obama’s speech: The speech on race that Obama gave yesterday has drawn rave reviews. It was a bold and daring speech. Could anyone else have discussed both the injustice of slavery and white fears of busing? As we predicted, he hit a homerun with the media elite; in fact it was batting practice -- with the political world watching. It's hard to find an editorial board in the country that didn't praise him for this speech. But as others including NBC’s Tim Russert and MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough have pointed out, its political impact is unknown. Will it play as well in Scranton and Asheville as it played in DC? What was interesting was the reaction on the right. The thought leaders on the right seemed to praise the speech, while its political leaders clearly see gain in keeping the Wright story alive (see Newt Gingrich's comments). While McCain may not be comfortable using the race card in the general against Obama, plenty of others may see the electoral map pragmatism in it. In fact, one thing may have become clear yesterday, regardless of how well received Obama's speech was: His electoral map has probably shrunk. His path to 270 will be different than Clinton's, but it will be just as much of a tightrope. Obama may trade Ohio for Virginia and Colorado, he won't be simply adding to the 2000/2004 Dem map.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on Barack Obama's racial divide speech and takes a look at Hillary Clinton's search for a Michigan revote.

*** A few other race thoughts: Yesterday presented an opportunity for Obama to audition in front of millions of Americans responding to one of the nation’s trickiest topics. And here’s a question these voters may be asking themselves: After the last eight years, which person -- Clinton, McCain, Obama -- do they want to see on their TV sets for the next four to eight years? On that test, Obama probably scored very high marks. Neither Clinton nor McCain appear to have an ability to give that great speech; it's never been their strong suit. But it's not as if the current occupant got to the White House by being a great orator. One other unintended consequence of Obama’s speech: If he’s elected president, does this mean Democrats can no longer accuse the religious right of being too political? One thing the American public is learning is that the black churches are just as political as the Christian conservatives.

*** Beyond Pennsylvania: On this fifth anniversary of the beginning of the Iraq war, Obama gives yet another big speech today -- this one in Fayetteville, NC on the topic of Iraq. Indeed, Obama's schedule this week includes travel in three states, none of which are Pennsylvania. He's in North Carolina today (May 6 primary), West Virginia tomorrow (May 13 primary) and Oregon on Friday (May 20 mail-in primary, with ballots mailed to voters as early as May 2). Of course, this is central to his path to the nomination: While Clinton is expected to do well in Pennsylvania (and Kentucky and West Virginia, too), Obama has the opportunity to offset those losses in other contests, allowing him to hold on to his 100-plus lead in pledged delegates. Clinton's schedule is also now showing diversity from Pennsylvania with West Virginia and Indiana on the docket. Bottom line: Both campaigns are sending the message that Pennsylvania, while important, is not the new Iowa. If anything, the next Iowa may very well be Indiana.

*** McCain’s misstep: For those who have focused on every word of the Jeremiah Wright controversy or who have paid attention to every nuance in the back-and-forth over re-dos for Florida and Michigan, you might have forgotten that McCain has been overseas in the Middle East on a CODEL with two of his closest friends in the Senate. And yesterday, the presumptive GOP nominee -- who has staked much of his candidacy on his support for and knowledge of the Iraq war -- made a pretty significant misstep: He stated several times that Iran (a Shiite country) was helping Al Qaeda (a Sunni organization), which obviously is incorrect. After friend Joe Lieberman, who is accompanying the Arizona senator, whispered into his ear, McCain corrected himself. As we asked earlier, what would have been the reaction if Obama or Clinton had made this mistake? (Or what would have been the reaction if either of them, after clinching the Dem nomination, had taken a taxpayer-funded trip to the Middle East that seems more political than senatorial?) One of the ironies of this presidential contest is that despite his high profile, McCain’s words, actions, and past haven’t received the scrutiny that a presumptive nominee usually gets.

*** Is the worm turning? Earlier this week, we noted that the Clinton campaign hadn’t publicly announced the support of a new superdelegate since February 7 -- and that since Super Tuesday, Clinton had lost seven supers (including Eliot Spitzer) while Obama had gained 47. But that now has changed. Per NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones, Iraq war critic Rep. Jack Murtha of Pennsylvania is now backing Clinton. It’s a BIG pick up. "Her experience and careful consideration of these issues convinced me that she is best qualified to lead our nation and to bring credibility back to the White House," he said in a statement. In addition, we learned through the Charleston Gazette that DNC Committeeman Pat Maroney is supporting Clinton, and Maroney previously wasn’t on our list. So Clinton picks up two new superdelegates, which changes our superdelegate count to Clinton 255, Obama 217 and our overall count to Obama 1,625, Clinton 1,506.

*** A significant hire: Speaking of the Clinton camp, here is some news we reported last night, but which bears repeating: The campaign has hired Democratic pollster Geoff Garin. The question becomes, of course: How does this impact pollster and chief strategist Mark Penn? Some in the campaign have been arguing for months that the chief strategist shouldn't be polling his own message ideas. Garin, one of the most respected Dem pollsters in the country, is someone who will have instant credibility inside the campaign and -- more importantly -- with worried anti-Penn donors. Above all, Garin brings an expertise in many of the key states where Clinton needs big victories, including Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Indiana. In fact, there are very few Democrats who win in Indiana without the help of Garin. By the way, news of Garin's hire has warmed the hearts of quite a few Clinton supporters, at least the ones we've heard from.

*** Confronting the big issue: So President Bush -- like Obama today and Clinton on Monday -- is giving a major speech marking the Iraq war anniversary. Of course, such a speech is totally appropriate. But Bush still hasn't addressed the nation on the current economic angst that is gripping the country.

*** On the trail: Elsewhere today, Clinton is in West Virginia, where she has a discussion with veterans in Huntington and then holds a town hall in Charleston; McCain remains overseas; Obama holds a town hall in Charlotte, NC after his Iraq speech; and Bill Clinton spends his day in Pennsylvania.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 34 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 48 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 230 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 307 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

DiscussDiscuss (133 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's speech: The analysis

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:17 AM by Mark Murray

The Washington Post: "The speech drew praise for its forthright expression of black-white divisions and for its call to all Americans to begin to reconcile those differences. Whether it will solve the potentially serious political problems that Wright's long-standing relationship with Obama has created is a far different question, and one upon which political strategists disagreed on Tuesday after the address."

The New York Times: “In a speech whose frankness about race many historians said could be likened only to speeches by Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln, Senator Barack Obama, speaking across the street from where the Constitution was written, traced the country’s race problem back to not simply the country’s ‘original sin of slavery’ but the protections for it embedded in the Constitution. Yet the speech was also hopeful, patriotic, quintessentially American — delivered against a blue backdrop and a phalanx of stars and stripes.” 

The Los Angeles Times adds, “It was a speech that seemed unlikely to come from a politician viewed as simply white or black. Obama rejected the most controversial of Wright's comments, while saying he could never renounce the man who had helped introduce the senator to Christianity, officiated at his wedding and baptized his children.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (78 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's speech: The reviews

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:15 AM by Mark Murray

Here's a round up of editorials and local feedback from around the country. As expected, it is hard to find a negative editorial about Obama's speech. The New York Times’ editorial: "We can’t know how effective Mr. Obama’s words will be with those who will not draw the distinctions between faith and politics that he drew, or who will reject his frank talk about race. What is evident, though, is that he not only cleared the air over a particular controversy — he raised the discussion to a higher plane."

The Washington Post: "We don't agree with the way Mr. Obama described some of those problems yesterday or with some of his solutions for them. But he was right to condemn the Rev. Wright's words, was eloquent in describing the persistent challenge of race and racism in American society -- and was right in proposing that this year's campaign rise above ‘a politics that breeds division and conflict and cynicism.’”

The Arizona Republic’s editorial page: "This was the biggest speech of Obama's political life, the most majestic and sweeping any candidate has given thus far in the presidential campaign. It was also the riskiest, a gamble that Americans have the fortitude and willingness to face this searing issue."

The Baltimore Sun: "win or lose, Mr. Obama's thoughtful exposition of race in America was an important contribution to this presidential campaign."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (96 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: Getting desperate?

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:13 AM by Mark Murray

Is Clinton looking too desperate in her need for more contests? "In a sign of how badly she thinks she needs the Michigan delegates to catch the Democratic front-runner, Senator Barack Obama, Mrs. Clinton made a last-minute schedule change and planned to fly to Detroit on Wednesday to plead with Michigan lawmakers to approve a new primary election in June to replace the January contest that awarded no delegates."

More: "Obama’s campaign has resisted a new contest, saying that Michigan Democrats are divided, that a revote would not make much difference in the overall delegate count and that the Clinton camp was trying to change the rules to suit itself. The Michigan Legislature, which would vote on approving a new election, is deeply torn on it because of cost, legal questions and logistical difficulties." The Clinton campaign is accusing Obama's campaign of standing in the way of a re-vote. But "John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat who supports Mr. Obama, said the Obama campaign supported a new election to resolve the impasse — in theory. But it would be expensive and possibly illegal.”

“‘While a redo would be an excellent way to solve it, there’s a little problem of about  $12 million,’ Mr. Conyers said. ‘I also question the legality of someone raising private money to conduct a public election.’ Interestingly, Clinton supporters Ed Rendell and Jon Corzine, who ‘are trying to line up money to pay for a Michigan revote,’ contacted the financier George Soros, a Democratic donor, on Monday and asked him to help pay for a revote.”

“Mr. Soros, who has contributed to Mr. Obama but has no formal campaign role, refused, a spokesman, Michael Vachon said, adding, ‘George Soros does not support holding another primary in Michigan, because he believes doing so will further delay the selection of a Democratic candidate for November.’”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (46 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Looking ahead: New PA radio ads

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray

PENNSYLVANIA: Obama launches two radio ads in the state, focusing on Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Harrisburg. One is aimed at students and focuses on the war and student loans; the other targets independents, noting he does not take money from lobbyists.

INDIANA: Here's Bill Clinton campaigning in Indiana yesterday, per NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli: "We need your help," he said at the end of his remarks. "I believe she will win a big victory in Pennsylvania. I believe she will win in West Virginia and Kentucky. Nobody believes she can win in Indiana because it borders Illinois. If you show them they're wrong, she'll be the nominee, and she'll be the president."

NORTH CAROLINA: Carly Lindauer, who served as Clinton's New Hampshire deputy communications director, will be press wrangling for Hillary in North Carolina. She also recently worked for the campaign in Wisconsin, Vermont, and Missouri.

DiscussDiscuss (15 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Release the schedules...

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:11 AM by Mark Murray

What will reporters seize on today regarding the release of Hillary Clinton's schedules from her White House years? Will this spark stories about what's in the schedules or what hasn't been released? Will reporters focus on specific periods of times that coincide with the experience argument she's been making? For instance, during the Irish peace process negotiations, what was her day-to-day schedule? During the health-care fight, whom did she meet with? During the year of Monica, with whom did she consult? How much did she use the White House to launch her New York Senate campaign?

The New York Times: "The records to be released Tuesday amount to virtually all of her schedules of meetings, speeches and the like as first lady. They are being released in response to a suit brought under the Freedom of Information Act by the conservative group, Judicial Watch. The National Archives has explained the delay in making them public by arguing that the vetting process takes time. The Archives said in a statement Tuesday that the records, to be released both in Washington and in Little Rock, Ark., the site of the Archives-administered Clinton Presidential Library, were from the staff files of Patti Solis Doyle, Mrs. Clinton’s former campaign manager, who was her chief White House scheduler."

The coverage of Murtha’s endorsement stresses his challenge to the Iraq war in 2005.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (18 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Whoops

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:10 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

File this story in the "if Clinton or Obama had done this it would have been front-page news" file. The Washington Post reports, "John McCain, in the midst of a trip to the Middle East that he hoped would help burnish his foreign policy expertise, incorrectly asserted Tuesday that Iran is training and supplying al-Qaeda in Iraq, confusing the Sunni insurgent group with the Shiite extremists who U.S. officials believe are supported by their religious brethren in the neighboring country. The mistake, which he quickly corrected after a brief whisper from a colleague, was an unwelcome stumble as McCain."

“Democrats pointed out that McCain made the same assertion in a radio interview with talk show host Hugh Hewitt on Monday night, saying that ‘there are al-Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they're moving back into Iraq.’ In a statement, Democratic Party spokeswoman Karen Finney seized on the mistakes. ‘After eight years of the Bush Administration's incompetence in Iraq, McCain's comments don't give the American people a reason to believe that he can be trusted to offer a clear way forward,’ she said. ‘Not only is Senator McCain wrong on Iraq once again, but he showed he either doesn't understand the challenges facing Iraq and the region or is willing to ignore the facts on the ground.’”

“A spokesman for McCain's campaign accused the Democrats of launching unwarranted political attacks. ‘In a press conference today, John McCain misspoke and immediately corrected himself by stating that Iran is in fact supporting radical Islamic extremists in Iraq, not al Qaeda -- as the transcript shows,’ Brian Rogers said from McCain's Virginia headquarters. ‘Democrats have launched political attacks today because they know the American people have deep concerns about their candidates' judgment and readiness to lead as commander in chief.’”

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Is Russ getting close?

Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:09 AM by Mark Murray

Russ Feingold came closer to endorsing Obama during an editorial board meeting with the La Cross Tribune. "Feingold said he voted for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the Wisconsin presidential primary, and is ‘highly inclined’ to cast his superdelegate vote for Obama at the Democratic National Convention because Obama won Wisconsin. The past few weeks have been bad news for Democrats, Feingold said, mentioning problems between the campaigns of Obama and U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.”

“Obama’s speech Tuesday about racial issues raised by his Chicago pastor was ‘very convincing,’ Feingold said. ‘He pushed it away pretty good today, but it’s going to keep coming back.’”

DiscussDiscuss (8 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton camp hires another pollster

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:53 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Chuck Todd
First Read has learned that the Clinton campaign has hired Democratic pollster Geoff Garin to do polling for the campaign. Garin and his firm has plenty of experience polling in the upcoming battlegrounds of Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Indiana.

The question becomes, of course: How does this impact pollster and chief strategist Mark Penn? Some in the campaign have been arguing for months that the chief strategist shouldn't be polling his own message ideas.

Garin, one of the most respected Dem pollsters in the country, is someone who will have instant credibility inside the campaign and -- more importantly -- with worried anti-Penn donors.

DiscussDiscuss (50 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain in Jerusalem

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:30 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Bethany Thomas
JERUSALEM -- Led by one of the museum guides, McCain toured the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum earlier this afternoon. He arrived to a cheering and enthusiastic crowd outside the somber facility. One man even chanted, "Mac is back!"

The senator was visibly moved as he walked through the entire facility and laid a wreath in remembrance. Most of the tour was spent with the guide explaining display after display and McCain solemnly shaking his head in understanding and disbelief of the horror. Sens. Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman trailed slightly behind. McCain rarely spoke except when he learned that the late astronaut Ilan Ramon (who died in the Columbia shuttle crash) was the eighth fighter pilot in the 1981 operation to blow up the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq. McCain exclaimed, "He must have been young! In that seat you're the last one out."

McCain also visited the Children's Memorial, which pays tribute to the 1.5 million kids who died. He came out of the site looking choked up.

The three senators signed a guest book on their way out. McCain wrote: "I am deeply moved. Never again."

Speaking to reporters after the museum tour, McCain praised the founders for creating a "remembrance of the courage and bravery and sustainability of the human spirit." He also cited Viktor Frankl's book "Man's Search for Meaning".  One couldn't help but think that McCain reflected back to his time in captivity in Vietnam when he spoke about the book's concept that "they could take everything from us but our right to choose and we have chosen now as a nation and a world to make sure that never again is a reality."

DiscussDiscuss (20 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill talks up HRC on economy, electability

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:55 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
LAWRENCEBURG, IN -- Kicking off another small town tour in another primary state, Bill Clinton devoted nearly half of his time this morning to the state of the economy, calling recent moves by the Federal Reserve “commendable” but saying that it is Hillary who has the best solutions for the country.

“She is way the best prepared to take the reins of this economy and turn it around,” he told about 200 people gathered at the Dearborn Adult Center here. “She understands all these financial problems, and she understands what we have to do over the long run to create more jobs and raise incomes.”

Lamenting the growing inequality of incomes today, Clinton said his wife would pursue a “middle-class economic strategy,” one of “strategy of shared benefits, shared opportunities, and shared responsibilities.” “We gave billions of dollars to the big oil companies and the nuclear industry when they were making money hand over fist,” he said. “Hillary says we ought to invest it in America, in creating energy independence for America.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (108 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Race, identity, and Obama's next stop

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:42 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann
As he comes off of a sweeping address that thrust the racial politics of America into the spotlight, here's just a few thoughts on the climate that Obama will walk into tomorrow when he visits North Carolina.

He will speak less than 24 hours before state legislators come together for a special session to vote on the expulsion of a black congressman suspected of fraud; the accused lawmaker alleges that the charges are racially motivated. Obama also will walk into a local news cycle spinning around the death of a beloved UNC student at the hands of a troubled black juvenile, who is widely believed to represent the failures of the state's probationary system.

When he lands in Fayetteville, where he will talk about Iraq, he'll be 100 miles south of Durham, the site of the explosive racial confrontation kindled by the Duke lacrosse case. He'll be 100 miles northwest of the North Carolina house district that will be examined by the U.S. Supreme Court this fall to determine the constitutionality of racially gerrymandered "influence" districts. Just southwest of that is Wilmington, which saw a formal apology from the state's Democratic Party last year for the violent race riots perpetrated there by white supremacist Democrats in 1898.

And he'll be less than 200 miles northeast of the South Carolina capitol, the spot just referenced in his Philadelphia speech where the Confederate flag still flies.

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Hillary talks Obama, MI, records

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:35 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
PHILADELPHIA -- Clinton told reporters she looked forward to reading the much-anticipated speech on race and religion rival Barack Obama delivered today and said it was important to talk about issues of race and gender.

She also expressed disappointment at reports that a proposal for a re-vote in Michigan was in danger of dying and talked about the upcoming release of some of her records.

"I did not have a chance to see or to read yet Sen. Obama's speech but I'm very glad that he gave it. It's an important topic. Issues of race and gender in America have been complicated throughout history and they are complicated in this primary campaign. There have been detours and pitfalls along the way, but we should remember that this is a historic moment for the Democratic Party and for our country. We will be nominating either the first  African-American or woman for the presidency of the United States and that is something that all Americans can and should celebrate."

More: "I think it's important to address these issues of race and gender and I am looking forward to reading it, which I haven't had the chance to do. Bu I think that, you know, these are difficult issues and we have seen that in this campaign. Race and gender are difficult issues and therefore we need to have more discussion about them. So obviously, the more that Sen. Obama and I talk try to about it or try to put it in some context, the more people will feel free to do so as well and I think that's helpful for the country."

Her reaction to news that the prospects of Michigan's re-vote were on life support: "I think that would be real shame. I think that, you know, my campaign has been very public in its support of a re-vote. We have said we would support the people and government of Michigan in trying to do that, which I think is exactly the right thing to do, so I would hope that some last minute compromise would be worked out so that there can be a re-vote and I think there should be a re-vote."

On the release of her first lady schedules: "I think I'm probably the most transparent person in public life," she said, citing the many books that had been written about her. "I understand that the National Archives is finally going to release 11,000 pages of my schedules tomorrow, which, as you know has been totally their prerogative, as their process under law, which they have followed very painstakingly, and I am told that tomorrow they're gong to do it, although I'm told that, I don't know that for a fact. Stay tuned. There will be a lot more. The book and writing and words about me will continue to fill many archives and warehouses across the world."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (63 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain's Sunni-Shiite faux pas

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:22 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC's Mark Murray
As one of my NBC colleagues just asked: What if Clinton or Obama had made this mistake?

The Washington Post: "Sen. John McCain, traveling in the Middle East to promote his foreign policy expertise, misidentified in remarks Tuesday which broad category of Iraqi extremists are allegedly receiving support from Iran. He said several times that Iran, a predominately Shiite country, was supplying the mostly Sunni militant group, al-Qaeda. In fact, officials have said they believe Iran is helping Shiite extremists in Iraq."

More: "Pressed to elaborate, McCain said it was 'common knowledge and has been reported in the media that al-Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran, that's well known. And it's unfortunate.' A few moments later, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, standing just behind McCain, stepped forward and whispered in the presidential candidate's ear. McCain then said: 'I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al-Qaeda.'"

*** UPDATE *** McCain spokesman Brian Rogers emails First Read: “In a press conference today, John McCain misspoke and immediately corrected himself by stating that Iran is in fact supporting radical Islamic extremists in Iraq, not Al Qaeda -- as the transcript shows. Democrats have launched political attacks today because they know the American people have deep concerns about their candidates’ judgment and readiness to lead as commander in chief.”

*** UPDATE II *** The DNC counters, "The campaign’s blatant deception ignores the fact that McCain made identical comments during a one-on-one interview with Hugh Hewitt. McCain told Hewitt, 'As you know, there are al Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they’re moving back into Iraq.'"

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

HRC's First Lady schedules to be released

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:15 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Jeannie Ohm and Mark Murray
The National Archives has announced that it will be releasing tomorrow Hillary Clinton's schedules as First Lady.

Below is the press release from the National Archives...

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (51 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

MI re-do 'all but dead'

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:44 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Chuck Todd
First Read confirms, per a Michigan source, this report from the Michigan Information and Research Service (MIRS)

Subject: MIRS BREAKING NEWS: June 3 Primary All But Dead-- 11:50 AM

Senate Democrats emerged from a closed-door caucus this morning and proclaimed that a fledging idea floated by top Michigan Democrats to create a special June 3 primary election is all but dead.

"The votes aren't there to do it," said Sen. Buzz THOMAS (D-Detroit), the co-chair of the Barack OBAMA campaign in Michigan

Sen. Gretchen WHITMER, a supporter of Hillary CLINTON, also conceded the chances of a June 3 redo of the Democratic presidential primary were slim. She stopped short of declaring it dead, saying instead that it was "on life support" and in need of CPR.

The Legislature would need to approve a bill by a two-third vote to put in place a June 3 special primary that would replace the results of the Jan. 15 presidential primary, which the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is not recognizing because the early date violated national party rules.

Support for the primary is weak for numerous reasons, the biggest reason being Obama's reluctance to sign off. Republicans, local clerks and state officials, however, also have raised concerns about rushing to create a special primary for logistical and legal reasons.

Without the redo, Michigan Democrats and independents risk not having a substantive voice in the Clinton-Obama horserace before a DNC deadline for states to report their delegate count expires on June 10.

DiscussDiscuss (76 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The reviews of Obama's speech are in

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:36 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
The reviews from political analysts and liberal bloggers are mostly positive. Here's a sample of their reviews and/or smart takes...

The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder: "I do think that Obama's speech was a marvel of contemporary political rhetoric. Politically, analytically and emotively, it hit many high notes. His acknowledgment of white working class resentments (busing) and about the perception that there's been no racial progress, his willingness to stick by his friends, his grasp of history, his sense that our views of race are cramped and caricatured... all of that is something that even those who disagree with the substance of his speech, can, I think, appreciate."

The Politico's Ben Smith: A smart colleague notes that this speech is the polar opposite of this year's other big speech on faith, in which Mitt Romney went to Texas to talk about Mormonism, but made just one reference to his Mormon faith. Obama mentions Wright by name 14 times.

TPM's David Kurtz: "It is remarkable for its nuance, for its long view of history, and for its decency. I am not sure, on first take, how effective it is politically. Your thoughts? Late Update: The text is one thing. Delivery is another. And Obama doesn't seem to have his A game today."

TPM's Josh Marshall: "I think I have to dissent from David's view that Obama didn't bring his A-game to the speech this morning. I was only able to listen/watch out of the corner of my eye because I was on deadline for something else. But my sense was that the tempo and tenor was suited to the occasion. The kind of stirring delivery he's made a trademark of in his victory celebrations would not have been appropriate for the moment."

The pro-Obama Andrew Sullivan: "Alas, I cannot give a more considered response right now as I have to get on the road. But I do want to say that this searing, nuanced, gut-wrenching, loyal, and deeply, deeply Christian speech is the most honest speech on race in America in my adult lifetime. It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history... I have never felt more convinced that this man's candidacy - not this man, his candidacy - and what he can bring us to achieve - is an historic opportunity."

The pro-Clinton Taylor Marsh: "Senator Obama gave a speech today that is larger than politics, but it in no way ends his political challenges. The national wound of race Barack didn't want to touch is now reopened nationally and in the spotlight again. While his campaign wants to move on, the country will not, because everyone will be talking about race, through the invitation of Obama's speech today."

Scout Finch from DailyKos (which is mostly pro-Obama): "This speech is amazingly honest and will hopefully spark a long overdue discussion on race in America. We'll see if it is enough to blunt to criticism of his relationship with Reverend Wright.  I think he's done a spectacular job thus far of denouncing specific remarks by Reverend Wright, while still standing steadfastly by him and his community."

*** UPDATE *** Here's the take from CBN's David Brody: "We won't know for awhile how voters view Barack Obama's speech today on race relations but The Brody File saw it as a HUGE positive for Obama and a successful turning point for the future of his campaign."

*** UDPATE II *** Hotline On Call's Jennifer Skalka: "Obama gave an eloquent speech today that will do much to quiet the increasingly polarizing debate about race in the Democratic contest. But more importantly, and more tellingly, he gave a deeply personal talk about his race, about his experience as a biracial American. And voters needed to hear it. Not because his biography is, in and of itself, the answer for these confusing times, but because, perhaps, only a person of his experience can dare all of us to be our better selves."

DiscussDiscuss (79 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The full text of Obama's speech

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:52 AM by Mark Murray

“A More Perfect Union”
Constitution Center
Tuesday, March 18th, 2008
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.” 

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy.  Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787. 

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished.  It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations. 

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution – a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time. 

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States.  What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (96 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama addresses America's racial legacy

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:41 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
PHILADELPHIA -- Barack Obama gave a sweeping address on race in this country today, using the statements made by his pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, to reflect broadly on the racial stereotypes and conditions that have polarized the country.
 
"The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through -- a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American."

Obama's speech comes after a week of negative news stories and cable news chatter over Wright's comments. Obama tried to staunch the flow of criticisms through a series of interviews on Friday evening, but the story didn't go away.

In today's speech, Obama did not shy away from addressing the controversy that Wright's comments sparked. "Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork," he said. "We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (109 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Color before Obama's speech

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:17 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
PHILADELPHIA -- The auditorium is tiny with about 187 seats by my count. The number of press inside the venue have been limited, with a large overflow for more press members in a separate room. So many media applied to be at the event that the campaign actually had to remove some names. When Michelle Obama entered and sat ath the corner right in the front row, photographers flocked over to snap her picture. he eventually got up and left. People from the community, all dressed in suits, are walking in clutching their tickets. Seats are assigned and tickets are hard to come by. 
 
Aides are testing the podium, the teleprompter and the microphone repeatedly. Reporters are staying put afraid that their front row seat to one of the most compelling moments for the Obama campaign might be stolen.

DiscussDiscuss (71 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Obama's big speech

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Mark Murray
*** Obama’s big speech: The last time a top presidential candidate gave an important speech on a sensitive topic was last December, when Mitt Romney talked about American faith. His speech drew favorable reviews, but he didn’t talk much about his own Mormon faith, an issue that ultimately hurt his campaign (evidenced by polls and even the rise of Mike Huckabee). After a week dominated by race -- whether Geraldine Ferraro’s remarks or those by Rev. Jeremiah Wright -- Obama will give a speech on the subject in Philadelphia at 10:15 am ET. Unlike what Romney did, Obama will address the controversy facing him head on. “He'll discuss the controversy surrounding the offensive remarks made by Reverend Wright, but also why they were so contrary to the purpose of his candidacy, which is based on the recognition that there is far more that unites us than divides us," an Obama aide emails First Read. If Obama can't hit a homerun on this speech today, then he won’t be president. This is in his wheelhouse; it's what has motivated him for the beginning. As he told PBS’ Gwen Ifill yesterday, noting he comes from a white mother and a black father: “It’s in my DNA to believe that all of us have something fundamental in common.”

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on Democratic hopeful Barack Obama's speech addressing race in America.

*** The damage report: Yet it also seems that the controversy surrounding Wright and his remarks has hurt Obama -- so far. A new USA Today/Gallup poll shows Clinton outperforming Obama when matched up against McCain -- something that hasn’t happened often in the past several weeks. In the poll, Clinton is ahead of McCain by five points nationally (51%-46%), while Obama leads him by two (49%-47%). That said, a new CNN poll conducted as Wright’s comments saturated the TV networks shows Obama up by seven points over Clinton nationally (52%-45%). Obama’s speech today has the potential to bookend this Wright controversy, at least in the short term.

*** Let’s talk about race, baby… Let’s talk about you and me: Speaking of race, did anybody else catch Bill Clinton calling the interpretation of his comparison of Obama to Jesse Jackson a “total myth and a mugging”? Should he really have used the term "mugging"? Clearly, the former president believes he was wronged in how he was criticized, even as members of Clinton's campaign have all but admitted he stepped over the line in his remarks about Obama. Just askin’: If Obama is being compelled to give a speech about his race, and Romney felt forced to give one about his faith, will Hillary Clinton ever have to give a speech about her husband? Has this campaign shown that it is better to address the elephant in the room, or leave it alone? If Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee, the GOP and the press will likely force her to give one about his role at some point. Months ago, many Clinton partisans said she wouldn't need to until the general. That's probably still the case.

*** Hoosier daddy: Today, Bill Clinton campaigns in Indiana, a sign that the Clinton campaign has picked its next "do or die" state after Pennsylvania. It won't be North Carolina, but Indiana -- a state Obama plans to campaign in vigorously, too. In fact, an argument can be made that PA and NC will cancel each other out, and the real test will be the Hoosier State. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton also has Indiana on her schedule this week, as well as West Virginia, a state that comes later in the May calendar. How soon before Obama heads to Oregon? The ballots will go out relatively soon, no?

*** Just askin’ II: If Edwards were to endorse Clinton wouldn’t this be the week to do it -- when Obama’s support among whites is taking a hit?

*** The Florida and Michigan soap operas: Ok, so now with a Florida re-vote dead, all eyes are on Michigan. The legislation is written, but lawmakers in Michigan apparently want sign-off from the campaigns and there's clearly a hesitance from Team Obama. The Clinton folks believe they have Obama in a box on this one, and it's possible Obama's current tenuous political situation re: Wright makes it even harder for him to find a reason to come out against the new plan. Some Obama partisans are apparently unhappy that independents who might have voted in the original Dem primary -- but decided to vote in the GOP primary in Michigan -- won't have a chance to vote in this new primary (and because it also violates DNC rules to have folks vote in a GOP primary AND a Dem primary). Is that an argument that will hold up? Whatever happens, it has to happen this week in Michigan because the state legislature leaves for a two-week recess beginning Friday.

*** The buck stops where? Why hasn't Bush addressed the country on the economy? Sure, there are a bunch of elected Republican members of Congress and a certain GOP presidential nominee who would fear Bush doing that and putting a GOP brand on this economic downturn, but isn't this one of those leadership moments when the country wants to understand better what he thinks government can do about the economy? Even when it seems the country doesn't really listen to Bush anymore during these speeches (notice the lack of poll bumps he gets after national addresses), this does seem like one of those times he should at least try.

*** On the trail: Elsewhere today, Clinton campaigns in Pennsylvania and McCain remains overseas. Also, the liberal Take Back America conference in DC continues, with (among other things) a discussion on MLK and the civil-rights movement.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 35 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 49 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 231 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 308 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.  

DiscussDiscuss (130 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's speech: The Wright stuff?

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:10 AM by Mark Murray

Here is how the Obama campaign is previewing Obama’s speech, per an aide: “As the events of the last few weeks have pushed the issue of race to the forefront of this campaign, Senator Obama will deliver an address that seeks to understand the divisions that still exist in our society and begin an honest, open conversation about how our generation can begin to move beyond the battles and tensions of previous generations. He’ll discuss the controversy surrounding the offensive remarks made by Reverend Wright, but also why they were so contrary to the purpose of his candidacy, which is based on the recognition that there is far more that unites us than divides us.” 

The New York Times: "Obama, in a speech Tuesday in Philadelphia, will repeat his earlier denunciations of the minister’s words, aides said. But they said he would also use the opportunity to open a broader discussion of race, which his campaign has said throughout the contest that it wants to transcend. He will bluntly address racial divisions, one aide said, talking about the way they play out in church, in the campaign, and beyond. Mr. Obama continued to write the speech on Monday evening, which he believes could be one of the most important of his presidential candidacy, aides said. His wife, Michelle, had not been scheduled to travel with him this week, but hastily made plans to be in Philadelphia."

More: "Obama concluded over the weekend that he had not sufficiently explained his association with the pastor. He told several aides he was worried that if voters did not hear directly from him — in the setting of a major speech — doubts and questions about him might grow.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (65 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: The low road?

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:09 AM by Mark Murray

"A majority of Democratic voters say it would be unfair for Hillary Rodham Clinton to win the presidential nomination through the support of ‘super delegates’ if she lags among the convention delegates elected in primaries and caucuses, according to a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll. If that happens, one in five say they wouldn't vote for the New York senator in the general election."

Politico's Roger Simon gets Obama strategist David Axelrod to say some tough things about the Clinton campaign. "Is it possible to win the Democratic nomination in such a way as to make winning not worth it? The Barack Obama campaign thinks so. It thinks Hillary Clinton’s campaign is willing to take any road to the White House, including the low road. ‘They would do anything to win, and that means anything,’ David Axelrod, Obama’s chief strategist, told me Monday. ‘There is a frenetic energy around them to commandeer this election in any way they can.’”

“Axelrod went on: ‘She is the ultimate Washington inside player. She is always asking, “How do we wire the vote? How do we wire the system to get the results we want?”’” More: "Another Obama senior aide told me he believed Clinton was willing to ‘destroy the party’ just as long as she ends up with the nomination.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (23 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Looking ahead: Clinton up in PA

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:05 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

PENNSYLVANIA: From a new Quinnipiac Univ. poll: “The momentum in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary battle has shifted back to New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, who now leads Illinois Sen. Barack Obama 53 – 41 percent among likely primary voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. This compares to a 49 – 43 percent Sen. Clinton lead in a February 27 poll by the independent Quinnipiac University. In that survey, the momentum was with Sen. Obama who had narrowed a 52 – 36 percent gap from a February 14 poll.”

INDIANA: The Indianapolis Star notices all the attention the Clintons are lavishing on Indiana this week. "Obama was the first to appeal directly to Hoosiers for their votes this year, with a rally and town hall meeting Saturday in Plainfield. But if Clinton lost anything by arriving second, she’s making up for it in the attention she and her husband are paying the state this week. Her visits will include meeting with a small group of people at an as-yet-unidentified diner in Terre Haute, followed by a town hall meeting at the Anderson High School Wigwam gymnasium and a rally in Evansville. Complete details were not available Monday."
 
Clinton's chief Indiana surrogate, Evan Bayh, "conceded that Obama, from neighboring Illinois, has some built-in advantages in wooing Indiana voters. ‘He’ll outspend Sen. Clinton … he’s been doing that in other states.’ And, Bayh said, about 20 percent of Indiana households get their television news from Chicago stations, so they have been familiar with Obama since he won his Senate seat in 2004.”

DiscussDiscuss (36 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: A 'mugging'?

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:04 AM by Mark Murray

Bill Clinton, in an interview, said the criticism he received over remarks about Obama in South Carolina was a "mugging." More Clinton: “‘They made up a race story out of that,’ Mr. Clinton said. ‘There was no disrespect to Senator Obama in that. So I think that our side got a bum rap about what was said about South Carolina. But the point is, that’s political tactics. They thought they could hurt me with that, and so they put a bizarre spin on it, and it worked for a while.’”

“The campaign did not play ‘a race card,’ Mr. Clinton told CNN. ‘We had some played against us,’ he said, ‘but we didn’t play any.’ Mr. Clinton has been campaigning for months, sometimes conducting three or more events a day and speaking to large town halls and rallies. (Mrs. Clinton usually campaigns separately.)

DiscussDiscuss (26 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: O'Bama

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:03 AM by Mark Murray

Everyone's Irish on St. Patrick’s Day, even Barack Obama who -- with a Kenyan father and a mother from Kansas and an upbringing in Hawaii -- doesn't immediately appear to fit the bill for the quintessential Irish American, NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan reports. But Obama boasted of his Irish roots at a short speech yesterday honoring Irish Americans at the Society for Irish Women's St. Patrick's Day dinner in Scranton. His only green accoutrement was a borrowed green tie.

Obama told the crowd that one of his earliest American relatives emigrated from Ireland and since then the small town where that ancestor hailed from, Moneygall, has adopted Obama. The senator also began the day with a talk with the Irish prime minister and promised the crowd that if he were to become president, "Ireland would have a friend in the White House."

Playing with the pronunciation of his name, he joked that "Bar - achk!" pronounced with a throaty emphasis on the "achk" was an old Celtic name.

Here's an interesting fact, courtesy of Bloomberg News: "Less than one-third of the 191 black members of the boards of the largest 250 U.S. companies have contributed to the Illinois senator's campaign, according to Federal Election Commission records. The list of board members was compiled by Black Enterprise magazine. Former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk, who is backing Obama, said the relative lack of support reflects a systemic problem: black corporate leaders haven't yet developed the habit of opening their wallets for candidates. Kirk said he encountered a similar reticence in his failed bid as the Democratic nominee for a Texas U.S. Senate seat in 2002."

DiscussDiscuss (2 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Iraq politics

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:02 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

The New York Times writes, "Though they could have allowed the milestone to be overshadowed by the crisis on Wall Street, Senators John McCain, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama aggressively seized on Iraq. That they did so, in the face of risks for each of them in the handling of the issue, was evidence of the large role all sides believe the war will continue to play in months ahead, even as the weakening economy takes center stage. Of the three, Mrs. Clinton, Democrat of New York, moved the most aggressively, and perhaps most unexpectedly, given the extent to which her vote in 2002 to authorize the war has caused her problems with Democratic primary voters."

More: "While Iraq may have faded from public consciousness a bit, in reflection of a drop in the number of casualties and rising concern about the economy, it remains a politically defining issue for both parties, one sure to shape the arguments about national security this fall. The day’s back-and-forth amounted to a preview of that debate."

The DNC is up with a new Web video tying Bush to McCain on the issue of Iraq. “Bush and McCain: Wrong then, wrong now,” the video concludes.

DiscussDiscuss (4 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

It's the economy...

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:01 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

The Los Angeles Times leads: "For months, the top presidential candidates have focused on showing a war-weary public that they have what it takes to be the next commander in chief. But on Monday, as the Iraq war entered its sixth year, they faced a test with far more relevance to the everyday lives of Americans: whether they could serve as economist in chief."

"Though McCain, Clinton and Obama have talked often about taxes and spending cuts, discussing the tools available to the Federal Reserve to stem financial crises did not appear to be natural terrain for any of them. On Monday, the three applauded the Fed's weekend move that paved the way for the buyout of Wall Street brokerage Bear Stearns. But none of the candidates offered specific economic policy proposals beyond their past statements addressing the months-old housing mortgage crunch."

More: "The upheaval in the financial markets has provided a pointed lesson in how little control candidates have at times over their campaigns' agendas and atmospherics. As much as they wanted, or expected, the 2008 race to hinge on the war or the demand for expanded healthcare coverage, the economy is now the No. 1 issue -- and it is forcing the candidates to formulate responses to problems without obvious solutions."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (9 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

New York: Start spreading the news...

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:00 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

Oy, here we go again? The new governor, David Paterson, and his wife admitted to extramarital affairs, hours after to being sworn in. For what they’re worth, these are rumors we heard about hours after it was clear he was going to be governor. The New York Daily News: "In a stunning revelation, both Paterson, 53, and his wife, Michelle, 46, acknowledged in a joint interview they each had intimate relationships with others during a rocky period in their marriage several years ago.”

“In the course of several interviews in the past few days, Paterson said he maintained a relationship for two or three years with ‘a woman other than my wife,’ beginning in 1999. As part of that relationship, Paterson said, he and the other woman sometimes stayed at an upper West Side hotel — the Days Inn at Broadway and W. 94th St. He said members of his Albany legislative staff often used the same hotel when they visit the city."

DiscussDiscuss (3 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Campaigns respond to no-vote in Fla.

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:23 PM by Chuck Todd

From the Obama campaign: "“We hope that all parties can agree on a fair seating of the Florida delegates so that Florida can participate in the Democratic Convention, and we look forward to working with the Florida Democratic Party and competing vigorously in the state so that Barack Obama can put Florida back into the Democratic column in November.”

From the Clinton campaign: “Today’s announcement brings us no closer to counting the votes of the nearly 1.7 million people who voted in January.  We hope the Obama campaign shares our belief that Florida’s voters must be counted and cannot be disenfranchised.”

DiscussDiscuss (60 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama reviewing Mich. plan

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:09 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
The Obama campaign has put out an official statement on the Michigan re-vote proposal that is now circulating among state Democratic leaders and the two campaigns.

“Considering the fact that Senator Clinton is currently trying to prevent and delay votes in Texas from being counted because she didn't like the outcome, it's pretty apparent that the Clinton campaign’s views on voting are dependent on their own political interest.  Hillary Clinton herself said in January that the Michigan primary “didn’t count for anything.” Now, she is cynically trying to change the rules at the eleventh hour for her own benefit. We received a very complex proposal for Michigan re-vote legislation today and are reviewing it to make sure that any solution for Michigan is fair and practical.  We continue to believe a fair seating of the delegation deserves strong consideration.” 

DiscussDiscuss (4 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

No re-vote in Florida

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 5:55 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Mark Murray
First Read has obtained a letter from Florida Democratic Party chair Karen Thurman, in which she says there won't be a re-vote in her state. This seems to mean: 1) that Florida's delegates won't be seated; 2) that they will, via a vote from the credentials committee; or 3) that there will be some sort of compromise (like counting delegates by half).

"Thousands of people responded. We spent the weekend reviewing your messages, and while your reasons vary widely, the consensus is clear: Florida doesn't want to vote again," Thurman writes. "So we won't."

"A party-run primary or caucus has been ruled out, and it's simply not possible for the state to hold another election, even if the Party were to pay for it. Republican Speaker of the Florida House Marco Rubio refuses to even consider that option. Florida is finally moving to paper ballots, which is a good thing, but it means that at least 15 counties do not have the capacity to handle a major election before the June 10th DNC primary deadline. This doesn't mean that Democrats are giving up on Florida voters. It means that a solution will have to come from the DNC Rules & Bylaws Committee, which is scheduled to meet again in April."

Here's the full letter...

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (21 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's PBS interview

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 5:30 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray, Andrea Mitchell, and Chuck Todd
PBS's NewsHour tonight will air an interview it conducted with Obama. A couple of choice exchanges, according to a transcript of the interview...

On whether Rev. Wright's comments have damaged Obama's campaign: "I would say that it has been a distraction from the core message of our campaign. I think part of what has always been the essence of my politics, not just this campaign, but my life is the idea that we’ve got to bring people together. Now, part of that is biographical as somebody who comes from a diverse background with a white mother and an African-American father growing up in Hawaii and Asia. You know, it’s in my DNA to believe that all of us have something fundamental in common." 

On Clinton's criticism of Obama on Iraq: "I mean, this is somebody who authorized the war, who continues not to want to claim that vote that sent us into war. If we had – if I had had my way, we would not be in this war. And so, I think Senator Clinton has a lot of chutzpah, as they say, to in some way to suggest that I’m the person who has not been clear about my positions on Iraq. I have been opposed to this war from the start."

"What I do believe is that we’ve got to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in. And that means, I believe, a phased redeployment, with a timetable, with a pace of about one to two brigades per month pulling our combat troops out; but also, redoubling our diplomatic strategy inside Iraq as well as with the regional players including Iran and Syria. It means dealing with the humanitarian issues involved. And by the way, I’m the only person who has issued a detailed plan to deal with the potential fallout as we are withdrawing."

DiscussDiscuss (41 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton camp wants re-vote in MI

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:32 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
The Clinton campaign is stepping up the pressure for Obama to agree to a re-vote in Michigan. Of course, trailing Obama in the delegate count, they have a greater interest in having a do-over there and in Florida. 

Said Clinton adviser Harold Ickes, who as a member of the DNC voted to strip both states of all their delegates: “The right to vote is the foundation of our democracy. If Barack Obama's campaign stands in the way of a new vote, he will be putting his own political interests ahead of the people of Michigan. They deserve to have a voice and a vote in the Democratic Party’s nominating process. A re-vote is the only way Michigan can be assured its delegation will be seated, and vote in Denver. If the Obama campaign thwarts a fair election process for the people of Michigan, it will jeopardize the Democratic nominee’s ability to carry the state in the general election.”

*** UPDATE *** Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor weighs in: “Considering the fact that Sen. Clinton is currently trying to prevent and delay votes in Texas from being counted because she didn't like the outcome, it's pretty apparent that the Clinton campaign’s views on voting are dependent on their own political interest. Hillary Clinton herself said in January that the Michigan primary “didn’t count for anything.” Now, she is cynically trying to change the rules at the eleventh hour for her own benefit. We received a very complex proposal for Michigan re-vote legislation today and are reviewing it to make sure that any solution for Michigan is fair and practical. We continue to believe a fair seating of the delegation deserves strong consideration.”

DiscussDiscuss (71 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Delegate update

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:54 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray and Chuck Todd
According to our new numbers, Obama actually lost a pledged delegate in California, so that brings the NBC hard count to Obama 1,408, Clinton 1,251.

The Obama campaign announced the support from a new superdelegate, Margie Gavin Woods of Illinois. However, Woods was already on NBC's superdelegate list for Obama, so the super split remains Clinton 253, Obama 217.

That brings us to a total of Obama 1,625, Clinton 1,504.

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama criticizes Bush on the economy

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:22 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
MONACA, PA -- Obama claimed that the economy was "teetering on a potential crisis" at a news conference here today and pointed a finger at President Bush, accusing him of poor fiscal management.

"History will not judge President bush kindly," Obama said of the economic downturn over the weekend, arguing that Bush appeared nonchalant over the potential crisis in remarks last week.

"When I saw the president in his press conference, almost lighthearted and joking about some of these issues, I think it did not instill the kind of confidence in the American people and certainly it didn't instill any confidence in me that the Administration is taking the situation seriously," Obama said.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (46 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama to deliver major speech on race

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:37 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
After a week dominated by race -- whether it was Geraldine Ferraro’s remarks or those by Rev. Jeremiah Wright that popped up on YouTube and the network news -- Obama will give a speech on the subject tomorrow morning from Philadelphia.

DiscussDiscuss (67 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton hits rivals in Iraq speech

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:42 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones and NBC's Mark Murray
WASHINGTON, DC -- Before speaking on the economy, Hillary Clinton delivered what her campaign billed as a major speech on Iraq -- in which she sharpened her attacks on rivals Barack Obama and John McCain for their policies on dealing with the country, and offered more specifics on her previously announced proposals for withdrawing troops and helping to increase stability there.

In remarks timed to highlight Iraq ahead of the five-year anniversary of the start of the war, Clinton sought to portray herself as best-prepared to deal with Iraq and as the only candidate with a concrete plan for getting troops out.

"The American people don't have to guess whether I'm ready to lead or whether I understand the realities on the ground in Iraq or whether I'd be too dependent on advisers to help me determine the right way forward," she told a small crowd at George Washington University today.

As part of a continued effort to paint Obama as a man of words and not action, Clinton this morning repeated her argument that Obama had done little to end the war in Iraq and noted that a (now former) foreign policy adviser told the BBC that he would not necessarily act on his plan to withdraw troops within 16 months if he becomes president.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (50 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton speaks on the economy

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:39 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
WASHINGTON, DC -- In remarks after her speech on Iraq here this morning, Hillary Clinton said she was watching the developments in US financial markets closely after efforts by the Federal Reserve over the weekend to try to head off a crisis. 

The Fed has lowered the discount rate to increase liquidity in the market and helped JP Morgan buy troubled firm Bear Stearns.

Clinton said she had spoken this morning with the Treasury secretary and the president of the New York Federal Reserve about the steps taken yesterday to restore confidence in the market and said that as a senator from New York, she was concerned about the impact these developments could have on workers and families -- both on Wall Street and on Main Street -- and on the city's economy as a whole.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (80 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Iraq is back

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:17 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Mark Murray
*** Iraq is back: Overshadowed in the last few weeks by the economy, the horserace, and even the recent back-and-forths over Geraldine Ferraro and Rev. Wright, the issue of Iraq returns to the campaign trail today. Just before the war’s five-year anniversary, John McCain is in the country, as is Vice President Cheney. Meanwhile, at George Washington University in DC, Clinton gives a speech this morning on Iraq. Per the New York Times, Clinton will discuss “her plan to begin withdrawing American troops within 60 days of coming into office… She was also expected to attack Mr. Obama over a recent statement by a former foreign policy adviser, Samantha Power, in which she said the Iraq withdrawal plan Mr. Obama had outlined while campaigning was a ‘best-case scenario’ that he would revisit once in office.” But is that the pot calling the kettle black? Earlier this month, the New York Sun reported that retired Gen. Jack Keane, who had briefed Clinton on Iraq and who had been asked to be a campaign adviser on military issues, said he had “no doubts whatsoever that if [Clinton] were president in January '09 she would not act irresponsibly and issue orders to conduct an immediate withdrawal from Iraq.” This should be a week the Obama campaign was looking forward to but it's not obvious he's going to get the advantage on Iraq that, perhaps, his campaign expected a few months ago.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on the presidential candidates' focus on the Iraq anniversary and not the economy situation.

*** Obama’s Iowa sweep: So the trashing of the caucus process was not good for Clinton's campaign, which got killed at the Iowa county convention re-caucus. Obama picked up an additional nine delegates, mostly from Edwards’ January 3 haul. The overall delegate take for each candidate: 25 for Obama (that's up from 16 ); 14 for Clinton (that's down one from her 15); and six hung with Edwards (down from 14). That takes Obama’s pledged lead over Clinton to 1,409 to 1,250. With the superdelegates thrown in (253 for Clinton, 217 for Obama), the delegate count stands at Obama 1,626, Clinton 1,503. This is more evidence that the outsider candidate (Obama) continues to beat the insider candidate (Clinton) at the ultimate insider game: the battle for delegates in odd county convention processes.

*** Full disclosure: After releasing all of Obama’s Rezko records and sitting with Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times reporters on Friday, the Obama campaign has upped the ante for Team Clinton. Yesterday, the Obama camp asked Clinton to release all of her tax records, disclose all of her earmarks, and make the donations to the Clinton presidential library and foundation public. The Clinton camp, in response, says Obama should release his tax returns for every year he's been in public office and every earmark he requested as a state senator. The pushback is obvious: try to cloud the lack of disclosure in the Clinton campaign with questions of lack of disclosure on the Obama front. This is the road the Obama campaign clearly wants to go down. The question is whether bareknuckles politics ultimately hurts Obama's image or whether a fight for disclosure brings back the bad news of the Clinton years Democratic voters -- and superdelegates -- might be tired of.

*** Clinton’s super problem: By our count, the Clinton campaign hasn’t publicly announced the support of a new superdelegate since just after February 5. Indeed, since Super Tuesday, Obama has gained 47 new superdelegates, while Clinton has lost seven (including Eliot Spitzer). Does Clinton have a bigger problem on the superdelegate front than folks realize? Why do we think party leaders -- who saw the Democrats lose governorships, state legislatures, and the control of Congress during the Clinton years -- suddenly jump on board the Clinton campaign? Isn't this the reason the Clinton campaign has only been able to keep uncommitted supers from climbing board Obama's bandwagon but they haven't been able to woo a new super to their side in a month? ? Isn't this also an explanation for why the Clinton campaign has done so poorly in the caucuses? The caucuses are made up of the activists who follow this stuff closer and think about things like electability and who can help the party keep Congress, etc. If Clinton's not winning over caucus activists, why should we believe she'll win over a large enough chunk of superdelegates to overcome Obama's pledged delegate lead? Ultimately, her best chance is to convince supers that Obama is completely unelectable on par with McGovern, an argument that might have been helped a tad by Rev. Wright.

*** Just askin’: Just how lucky is McCain that the political media world’s focus is on Clinton vs. Obama? Otherwise, wouldn’t his Iraq trip -- with Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman -- be getting a lot more scrutiny, as would the fact that he’s using taxpayer dollars to pay for a campaign trip? If there were two nominees right now, would McCain have even tried this? Probably not, since everything he was doing would be under more scrutiny.

*** I am liberal, hear me roar: While Clinton will be talking withdrawal from Iraq at George Washington University, across town in DC, the liberal Take Back America conference -- which famously booed Clinton over her Iraq views in 2006 and 2007 -- begins today. The confab, sponsored by the Campaign for America’s Future, today features a speech by Donna Edwards, who beat incumbent Rep. Al Wynn (D) in a primary last month and hears from Sen. Jim Webb later tonight. The theme of the conference, organizers told First Read last week, is that 2008 has an opportunity to be a sea-change election for the Democrats.

*** It’s the economy… : Today should be a major Iraq day, and instead it appears Washington (and New York) and the media will be consumed with the economy. The campaigns are all prepared for an Iraq week, but don't seem to be prepared for a week dominated by the economy. None of the three candidates has been aggressive about reacting to what's actually going on with the economy. All have plans about housing and taxes, etc. But none seem to be tempted into talking about why there's a credit crunch or what's going to pull the country out of this economic funk. And surprisingly, the media isn't demanding answers from the candidate on their prescriptions for the economy.

*** On the trail: Elsewhere today, Clinton heads to Albany after her Iraq speech to attend David Paterson’s swearing-in ceremony; McCain remains overseas; and Obama is in Pennsylvania, where he stumps in Monaca and Scranton.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 36 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 50 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 232 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 309 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.  

DiscussDiscuss (73 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: Trench warfare time

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:14 AM by Mark Murray

Remember the World War I trench warfare that never moved the lines? The Politico uses that analogy to discuss the next two and a half months, after which it’s unlikely that Obama’s pledged delegate lead changes much. “There are 10 scheduled contests left, but thanks to proportional allocation, not enough pledged delegates to be had for either Barack Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton to clinch the nomination. And, because of increasingly firm demographic voting trends, it appears to be a foregone conclusion who will capture most of the remaining states. So on June 3, when South Dakota and Montana end the current voting calendar, the contours of the race aren't likely to be much different from what they are today. That means 2 1/2 months of conference calls, attacks, counterattacks and millions of dollars spent, all to move the political needle just a few inches.” 

The Politico adds, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) reiterated her position Sunday that superdelegates should reflect the will of voters in the Democratic nominating process — a nod to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), whose campaign is making the same case.”

Reading in between the lines of the quotes from various superdelegates in this Sunday New York Times story, Clinton has a lot more work to do to convince these folks about her viability than she does the media.

John Harwood of CNBC and the New York Times looks at the backroom potential for a deal on Florida and Michigan delegates, and he quotes delegate veteran/consultant Tad Devine on what seems to be the biggest hurdle to a re-do: the cost. Is it worth $15-50 million in implementation and cost of new campaigns in these two states when, maybe, 20 delegates will get split at best?

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (36 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton v. Obama: The Obama offensive

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray

If yesterday's back-and-forth conference calls were any indication, the Clinton v. Obama race is going to nastier and more personal. "Obama communications director Robert Gibbs called on Clinton to release full post-White House tax returns; disclose all ‘earmarks,’ or pet projects, the New York senator had inserted into spending bills; and release all documents on the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Presidential Library, including a list of donors."

“‘This is a tried and true technique of the Obama campaign that has repeatedly shifted negative when they find the momentum working against them,’ said senior Clinton strategist Mark Penn. He suggested the Obama campaign was trying to ‘deflect public opinion from their losses in Ohio and Texas’ and from Clinton's strength in Pennsylvania."

Clinton communications director Howard Wolfson made a great point during his campaign’s response call: If the Obama campaign was so sure this race was wrapped up on the delegate front, then why were they preparing a full-frontal assault? While many of us can't find a delegate path for Obama, Wolfson claims the Obama campaign must have found one. Also of note from yesterday's conf. calls, NBC/NJ's Athena Jones notes: For at least the third time in the last two days, when given an opportunity to comment on Obama's handling of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the campaign declined.

Indeed, NBC’s Abby Livingston reports that while campaigning on Saturday, Clinton was asked about Wright. She said, “I think those are questions for Senator Obama and for the Obama campaign.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (73 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Looking ahead: Does PA really matter?

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:10 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

PENNSYLVANIA: Some notes from NBC/NJ’s Matthew E. Berger… The Clinton campaign opens its Allentown office Monday. It’s one of six in the state. No Clinton family members or key surrogates are expected in the state, making it the first in 10 days without a Clinton in Pennsylvania.
 
Obama will go to Philadelphia on Tuesday, but no details have been released. He’s holding a town hall Monday in Monaca (35 miles northwest of Pittsburgh) and speaking at the Society of Irish Women dinner in Scranton.
 
There’s only one more week for independents and Republicans to change their registration to Democratic for the primary. Already, more than 35,000 voters have changed their affiliation to vote in the primary since the beginning of the year, according to the Secretary of State’s office, and more than 80,000 new registrations have been completed. Obama aides circled the Philadelphia streets over the weekend, registering voters.
 
Putting Pennsylvania in perspective… Larry Eichel of the Philadelphia Inquirer suggests the Pennsylvania primary isn’t as all-important as many might think, especially if Florida and Michigan get to vote afterwards. “Analysts also have noticed that there will be more delegates at stake on May 6 when North Carolina and Indiana vote, 187, than the 158 available in Pennsylvania. Florida and Michigan account for 313.” The only way the state would matter is if Obama wins. “Such an outcome would undercut Clinton's oft-made argument that she is the preferred choice of the big states that dominate the Electoral College. For that reason, an Obama win would have a huge impact on the undeclared superdelegates, who hold the nomination in their hands.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (16 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: that 3:00 am call

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:09 AM by Mark Murray

Here’s an interesting fact-check type of story from the Washington Post, which looks at how many presidents ever had to make snap decisions at 3:00 am. Apparently, the only calls that come at that time are heads-up calls, not decision-making calls.

On Saturday, the New York Times reported that “influential” fundraisers for Clinton “have stepped up their behind-the-scenes pressure on national party leaders to resolve the matter” of Florida and Michigan, “with some even threatening to withhold their donations to the Democratic National Committee unless it seats the delegates from the two states or holds new primaries there.”

Yet it looks like activists at DailyKos are willing to make up for any donations that are lost.

DiscussDiscuss (13 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Visiting Baghdad

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:08 AM by Mark Murray

The AP: “Explosions rocked Iraq's capital on Monday as Vice President Dick Cheney and Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain visited ahead of the fifth anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion… McCain, the Republican party's likely presidential nominee who has linked his political future to U.S. military success in Iraq, met Monday with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki shortly before the Iraqi leader began talks with Cheney. The Arizona senator stressed the importance of a U.S. commitment to Iraq and warned a U.S.-Iraqi military operation to clear al-Qaeda from its last urban stronghold of Mosul will be ‘very difficult and very important.’”

How is it McCain is getting away with a CODEL with two of his closest senate friends, Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman? The New York Times: "The three senators are also visiting Israel, London and Paris. Mr. McCain has said the trip is not primarily political. He told reporters last Friday: ‘I do want to emphasize again that the three of us are going as members of the Armed Services Committee.’ On Thursday, however, Mr. McCain will attend a $1,000-a-plate fund-raising lunch at a home in London. His campaign has said Congress will be reimbursed for the political parts of the trip, including the fund-raiser.”

“Mr. McCain’s advisers have been cautious about the perception that he is exploiting his overseas trip for political gain. None of his top political advisers are traveling with him, and his campaign has been careful to route questions about it to his Senate office. But they say they believe that the trip is clearly beneficial to Mr. McCain, enabling him to showcase his national security credentials while his Democratic counterparts continue to battle for the nomination."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (12 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: How does he respond?

Posted: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:05 AM by Mark Murray

This was easily Obama's toughest weekend as a candidate. This is a test for him as a candidate. Does he wilt or does he get back up off the map and fight on without losing who he is?

The AP's Fournier writes, "Arrogance is a common vice in presidential politics. A person must be more than a little self-important to wake up one day and say, ‘I belong in the Oval Office.’ But there's a line smart politicians don't cross — somewhere between ‘I'm qualified to be president’ and ‘I'm born to be president.’ Wherever it lies, Barack Obama better watch his step."

More: "Obama's cool self-confidence got him into trouble in New Hampshire when he said Clinton was ‘likable enough,’ faint praise that grated on female votes who didn't appreciate him condescending to the former first lady. Privately, aides and associates of Obama tell stories about a boss who can be aloof and ungracious. He holds firmly to views and doesn't like to be challenged, traits that President Bush packaged and sold under the ‘resolute’ brand in the 2004 election. For Bush, those qualities proved to be dangerous in a time of war and in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (39 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Hillary hits two St. Patrick's Day parades

Posted: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:30 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
SCRANTON, PA -- Hillary Clinton spent Saturday celebrating the luck of the Irish at two massive St. Patrick's Day parades on opposites ends of the Keystone State.

As the senator walked, waved and held babies, including her niece Fiona in Scranton, her campaign held two conference calls to highlight her commitment to Northern Ireland and to hit Obama on issues from Tony Rezko to tax documents.

At the tail end of the roughly mile-long sea of green that was the Pittsburgh parade route, an emcee called Clinton a friend of the Pittsburgh Irish, and the senator briefly took the mic, telling the crowd, "May the luck of the Irish be with you," before heading on to Scranton, in the eastern part of the state.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (14 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Iowa update, part II

Posted: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:34 AM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
Last night, when I reported the net gain of 7 delegates for Obama out of yesterday's 99 county Democratic conventions, it was based on 96% of conventions reporting. But there were two Cong. districts where Edwards was teetering on the edge of viability, the 1st and the 4th. Well, Edwards teetered the wrong way and Obama netted the delegates. So, here are the final results:

Statewide: Obama won 52%, Clinton 32% and Edwards 16%. There are 16 delegates split up proportionately with Obama nabbing 8 delegates to Clinton's 5 and Edwards' 3.

Cong. District 1 (6 delegates): Obama won 54% to Clinton's 31% and Edwards' 14% (no viability). Obama won these delegates 4-2.

Cong. District 2 (7 delegates): Obama won 51% to Clinton's 30% to Edwards' 19%. Obama won these delegates 4-2-1
 
Cong. District 3: (6 delegates): Obama won 51% to Clinton's 31% to Edwards 18%. Obama won these delegates 3-2-1.
 
Cong. District 4: (6 delegates): Obama won 55% to Clinton's 34% to Edwards' 11% (no viability). Obama won these delegates 4-2.

Cong. District 5 (4 delegates): Obama won 47% to Clinton's 37% and Edwards' 15%. Obama won these delegates 2-1-1.
 
So the overall delegate take for each candidate: 25 for Obama (that's up from 16 during the Jan. 3 caucuses). 14 for Clinton (that's down one from her 15 during Jan. 3). And 6 hung with Edwards, that's down from 14 on Jan. 3.

So here's the new delegate total

Pledged Count: Obama leads 1,409-1,250
Superdelegates: Clinton leads 253-217
OVERALL TOTAL: Obama leads 1,626-1,503

Obama netted 10 delegates from this new Iowa exercise; that's more delegates than Clinton netted out of Ohio on March 4. Wonder if the Clintons want those negative comments about caucuses back? Will this negative caucus talk cost Clinton more delegates when other caucus states meet for state conventions?

DiscussDiscuss (47 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Iowa update

Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 7:17 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
We have final delegate allocation estimates directly from the Iowa Democratic Party based on today's 99 county conventions.  The results, Obama indeed did gain 7 delegates to up his total from 16 (earned on Jan. 3) to 23 now. Clinton upped her total by 1, from 15 to 16 and Edwards dropped 8 delegates to 6. Those six will be up for grabs, perhaps, at the Iowa Democratic Party state convention in June.

Here's the updated delegate total, counting these new Iowa allocations:

Pledged
Count: Obama leads 1,407-1,252
Superdelegates: Clinton leads 253-217
OVERALL TOTAL: Obama leads 1,624-1,505

DiscussDiscuss (36 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Another fight for Iowa

Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:46 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
The Clinton and Obama campaigns just got done fighting over Iowa... again!  The state's 99 county Democratic parties held conventions today and the two campaigns were actively fighting to gain even more pledged delegates. At stake: the 14 pledged delegates John Edwards earned during the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses.

Tonight, the Obama campaign claimed a gain of 7 pledged delegates, added to the 16 they earned on Jan. 3. Obama's manager, David Plouffe, also said their math had Clinton actually losing one of her 15 delegates that she garnered on Jan. 3.  BTW, if the 7 number is accurate, it would be two short of what Clinton netted out of Ohio.

Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign acknowledges Obama gained, but only three delegates and they say they didn't lose any. We're still trying to gather the results ourselves but it appears both campaigns are admitting Obama gained some delegates tonight.

This won't be the only time the campaigns will fight over delegates supposedly already allocated. Many of the caucus states will be holding conventions between now and June and both campaigns will try and win an extra delegate or two. One wonders if the Clinton campaign's trashing of the caucuses will end up hurting her when these caucus states meet to finalize and re-allocate their caucuses during their respective convention processes.

DiscussDiscuss (35 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain brings in $4 to $5 million

Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 12:49 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
After holding eight fundraisers in five days -- some of which the candidate didn't even attend -- the unofficial weekend fundraising total for the McCain campaign was between $4 and $5 million. The most lucrative fundraiser was at the Plaza Hotel in New York City, where the campaign raised more than $2 million. But the presumptive GOP nominee finished strong with a final finance event in Chicago, which netted nearly $1 million.

McCain lingered a little longer than usual in the Windy City, presumably due to the knowledge that he was done looking for handouts for at least a week while he travels overseas as the leader of a congressional delegation of members of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

DiscussDiscuss (2 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Confessional Friday for Obama

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:47 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
The Obama campaign has clearly decided that this Friday afternoon and evening is a bad news dump day. Not only will Obama be making the rounds explaining his denunciation of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright on MSNBC and other outlets tonight, the campaign also announced Wright would no longer be a member of the campaign's African American Religious Leadership Committee.

In addition to trying to put an end to the Wright controvery, Obama also spent time with the ed boards of the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times where he detailed his relationship with Tony Rezko.

In an interview with the Tribune, Obama admitted that "Rezko was a more significant fundraiser" in Obama's earlier campaigns than previously known. "Rezko raised as much as $250,000 for the first three offices Obama sought," the senator admitted. More from the Tribune piece: "In an extensive interview that he hoped would quell the lingering controversy over his relationship with Rezko, Obama said that voters concerned about his judgment should view it as 'a mistake in not seeing the potential conflicts of interest.' But he added that voters should also 'see somebody who is not engaged in any wrongdoing . . . and who they can trust.'"

A classic Friday evening bad news dump by the Obama campaign; frankly, as far as timing is concerned, it was probably smart, tactically, to attempt to bury this Rezko admission under the Wright controversy. We'll see if it works.  Clearly the campaign realizes they need to be as transparent as possible if they hope the transparency argument against Clinton regarding her tax returns, earmarks and presidential library records stays valid.

DiscussDiscuss (70 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

New York state of mind

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 5:34 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
New York Governor-to-be David Paterson is widely regarded in the New York State Senate as the right antidote to what was the tense, rocky and brief tenure of Eliot Spitzer. But with a hat tip to Ben Smith at Politico, we direct your attention to a Playboy article written in 2002 by Paterson's Chief of Staff Charles O'Byrne.

O'Byrne, a former Jesuit priest, who presided at John F. Kennedy Jr.'s wedding, wrote, "Indeed, the celibacy requirement made me postpone my decision to enter religious life (as did the number of obese, alcoholic and generally depressed middle-aged priests I encountered). Although I regarded celibacy as unnatural and probably unhealthy, the church demanded it, so I eventually decided I was ready to make the sacrifice. To test myself, I ab­stained from sex for a year before I said goodbye to civilian life.

"Once in the seminary, I quickly learned some harsh truths. Many of my classmates in the New York archdiocesan system were exceptionally narrow­-minded, and some were out-and-out bigots who made offensive remarks about Jews and Hispanics, among others, all the while offering pious phrases about Jesus. I protested, but nothing happened. I protested some more, and then told a friend what was going on. My friend wrote to John Cardinal O'Connor and urged him to investigate what sounded like officially approved hate crimes. With reason to fear a me­dia scandal, the archdiocese pretend­ed to discipline the seminary superior who had coddled the bigots, but in reality it merely shuffled him off to a cushy job. I was expelled from the seminary.

He later joined the Jesuits, but adds, "As time went on, however, I became aware that there was sex all around me -- including relationships between Jesuits. One of my best friends, a virgin at 30, was surprised when his superior encouraged him to respond to the sexual overtures of an older Jesuit. When another friend fell in love with a woman, the seminary superiors supported his relationship. In theology classes, certain priest-professors even shared information about their sex lives."

More: "The reality of religious life was often masked from the rest of the world. Seminary life, I realized, could pro­duce some weird characters. There was the clerical professor who ate a quart of ice cream each night before going to bed and kept pictures of his Irish setter and his mother on his desk. There was the drunk who poured vodka into his soda can to hide his constant boozing. And there was the 250-pound assistant rector (who was to judge our worthi­ness to be priests) who walked around the bedroom floor of our residence in various states of undress, sometimes naked. I also worried about the men we referred to as ‘boyologists' --priests who were too much into their students or into the seminarians with whom they were living."

He concluded, "For me, the contradictions proved too much, and I decided to leave the active ministry. It wasn’t an easy decision to make. I believe in the supremacy of one’s conscience -- that forum where God alone speaks to the individual as a counselor and guide. I could not serve two masters -- the official church and my conscience."

And there's more where that came from...

DiscussDiscuss (12 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama responds to Wright comments

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 4:41 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
In a statement on Huffington Post, Obama responded to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's comments. Here's some of what he writes:

The pastor of my church, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who recently preached his last sermon and is in the process of retiring, has touched off a firestorm over the last few days. He's drawn attention as the result of some inflammatory and appalling remarks he made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents.

Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue. ...

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church. ...

With Rev. Wright's retirement and the ascension of my new pastor, Rev. Otis Moss, III, Michelle and I look forward to continuing a relationship with a church that has done so much good. And while Rev. Wright's statements have pained and angered me, I believe that Americans will judge me not on the basis of what someone else said, but on the basis of who I am and what I believe in; on my values, judgment and experience to be President of the United States.

DiscussDiscuss (51 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

No plans for Wright to step down

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 3:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Mark Hudspeth
The Obama campaign says they have no plans to ask the Rev. Jeremiah Wright to step down from a campaign spiritual advisory committee. They're stressing that this committee -- the African American Religious Leadership Committee -- was a laundry list of people associated with the campaign and didn't really do anything. The group never actually met.

They say Wright has no formal role on the campaign (unlike some others on this committe who do have a formal role in faith-based outreach). They say he was included mostly out of respect to his long relationship with Obama.

Aides say he was not present during the Christmas 2007 sermon or the post-Sept. 11 sermon. They weren't sure about some of the others in question, are not sure when the last time the two spoke, and they stressed they don't speak frequently.

DiscussDiscuss (68 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Delegates: Obama picks up another

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 2:45 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Obama picked up another superdelegate -- his sixth since March 4th -- Wisconsin's Melissa Schroeder.

BY THE NUMBERS:
Pledged Count: Obama leads 1,400-1,251
Superdelegates: Clinton leads 253-217
OVERALL TOTAL: Obama leads 1,617-1,504

Since Super Tuesday, Obama is +47, Clinton is -7.
Since March 4, Obama is +6, Clinton is -1 (Spitzer).

NOTE: With the victory earlier this week by Andre Carson in a special election to replace his grandmother, the late Rep. Julia Carson, in IN-7, the superdelegate total moved back up to 795. ... Carson is Congress' second Muslim representative. Minnesota's Keith Ellison is the other.

*** UPDATE *** For those wondering about unallocated delegates, the numbers are unchanged since the last update. There are 10 delegates, which remain unallocated, including nine Texas caucus delegates and one from Democrats Abroad. Texas, overall, remains a 92-92 split as now.

DiscussDiscuss (75 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain critical of Bush, post 9/11

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 2:28 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
McCain said this at his town hall in Springfield, PA this morning:

"After 9/11 I think that we made a mistake by telling Americans they ought to go on a trip, or shop. I think we should've told Americans to join the military, the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps, volunteer organizations -- all of the organizations that allow people to serve this nation. There's wonderful programs out there some of them government and some of them volunteer... I think Americans are ready, they're ready to make many of the sacrifices if it's clearly explained to them how important it is and the crisis and the challenges we face." 

DiscussDiscuss (38 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

About that Senate conversation...

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 1:52 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Remember that caught on C-SPAN Clinton-Obama conversation in the seats of the Senate yesterday? AP reports that they spoke about trying to change the tone -- at least of their surrogates.

"They approached one another and spoke about how supporters for both campaigns have said things they reject," said Clinton spokesman Phil Singer, per AP. "They agreed that the contrasts between their respective records, qualifications and issues should be what drives this campaign, and nothing else."

"An Obama adviser, speaking on a condition of anonymity about the private conversation, gave a similar account, while stressing that it was Obama who approached Clinton on the subject. They committed to making sure that their supporters don't get overheated in the future, the adviser said."

DiscussDiscuss (51 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain rails against pork, Dems

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:33 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
While speaking to more than 500 people at the Springfield Country Club in Springfield, PA, McCain criticized the senate's late night last night as unproductive and meaningless. While going into his usual rant about the need to reign in earmarks in Washington, McCain said that the fact that only 29 senators voted for a one-year moratorium on earmarks proposed by Sen. DeMint showed that "the senate is disconnected from the American people."
 
"I again want to emphasize the vote last night, 29 votes in favor of a moratorium on earmarks and pork barrel spending, which shows the last place in America where they don’t get it is Washington, DC," McCain told reporters after his town hall. "Americans want this process stopped; they want waste and mismanagement of their tax dollars stopped, and it indicates the absolute requirement for the next President of the Unites States [to stop it]."
 
In his speech, he didn't mention that his two Democratic opponents supported the bill, but in his town hall, he gave both Clinton and Obama credit while criticizing the Democratic delegation in the senate as a whole for only mustering six votes in favor of the moratorium. But McCain also challenged his Democratic opponents to go further, as he had yesterday while speaking to reporters on his plane.
 
"Well, the first thing they can do if they’re against the earmarks is ask that the money that they’ve gotten, hundreds of millions that they’ve gotten in pork barrel projects, not be spent," McCain said, calling on both Obama and Clinton to take retroactive steps to stop earmarks. "A lot of that money’s not spent. So ask for it; if you’re against it, say it shouldn’t be spent, and I’m sure we could get it through that they wouldn’t have -- that that money wouldn’t have to be spent."

DiscussDiscuss (27 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Michigan re-vote mo'

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:07 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** 'So You're Tellin' Me There's A Chance…': While the idea of a Florida re-vote seems to be fading after yesterday, there’s a lot of momentum in Michigan for a June 3 re-vote, according to informed sources in the state. There are a couple of hurdles, including who pays for the primary. The state would pass a law that would appropriate the money to run this special primary election; not a mail-in, but a full bore in-person 100% open primary. The state, in turn, would be reimbursed by the Democratic Party or potentially other entities or even seeing if it's possible for donors to contribute to the state directly. Everyone seems to be on board in the state Democratic world of Michigan, including the governor, the Dingells, Carl Levin, the Kilpatricks and the UAW. For those that follow Michigan Democratic politics closely, you'll know getting all those folks in agreement isn't easy. The only thing that could stop this primary logistically is if the state party is told -- legally -- they can't raise the large soft money contributions they would need to raise in order to come up with the $10-12 million.

*** Terms for a settlement? The momentum for a revote in Michigan might actually expedite the negotiations between Clinton and Obama on what to do with Florida and Michigan delegates. There are some competing proposals out there. Obama's camp isn't interested in extending the campaign primary schedule, and Clinton's camp isn't interested in losing its argument that it already won Michigan and Florida. So some seating of a, say, 52-48 split on delegates with supers voting how they want, could be more possible as this revote stuff makes its way through the Michigan legislature. So the most interesting thing to could come out of this Michigan re-vote momentum is that negotiations for seating these delegates gets more serious.

*** The speaker speaks: For the second time in the past week, Nancy Pelosi yesterday shot down the idea of a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton “dream ticket.” "Take it from me, that won't be the ticket," she said, per NBC's Mike Viqueira. If this isn’t yet another sign that Pelosi is pretty much in Obama’s corner -- knocking down the idea that you can still get Obama if you vote Clinton -- we don’t know what is. Most of her House kitchen cabinet is behind Obama, and this just seems like another signal. No doubt the Clinton folks know this, which means it could make Pelosi's hope of playing elder stateswoman who can settle this at the end a bit harder.

*** Mother's Day: As disciples of presidential historian James David Barber will tell you, some of the greatest influences on modern American presidents have been their mothers. After reading today’s front-page New York Times profile of Obama’s late mother, we are pretty sure of this: If Obama goes on to win the White House, Ann Dunham Soetoro -- who was born in Kansas, moved to Hawaii, married a man from African, then married a man from Indonesia, and became an anthropologist -- could very well be the most fascinating presidential mother in this country’s history. 

*** Just when you thought you were out…: ...Iowa pulls you right back in. Under the radar, but coming up on Saturday are the Iowa county conventions, where delegates actually RE-caucus -- viability, threshold and all. Why does this matter? All those Edwards delegates (14 in total). Remember, Edwards finished second with 30% of the vote or 4,046 (out of 13,485) delegates to the county conventions. Where will they go? Do they go to Obama because of Clinton’s dissing of caucuses since Iowa? Do they go to Clinton? Or do these fiercely loyal delegates stick to Edwards, so they can wield more influence at the state convention? In a race for delegates, this normally mundane exercise is worth watching this weekend…

*** Clinton's TOO strong in Pennsylvania? If Clinton scores the endorsements that are rumored in Pittsburgh today, it will underscore the strength she has in this state. The establishment in Pennsylvania is not split at all. It's 95% behind Clinton, making a victory in the state all but assured this far out. And yet, is it good for Clinton to be this strong in the state this early? Will it spook Obama out of the state? Will it spook the media where they won't value a Clinton victory as much as they did in Ohio? Clinton is locking down this state early; Obama's headed to Indiana this weekend. The Pennsylvania race will inevitably close, but it does seem Clinton has a distinct advantage. She just doesn't want to get too far ahead, devaluing a potential victory.

*** On the trail: Clinton stumps in Pittsburgh (where she may lock up more key endorsements); McCain holds a media avail and town hall in Springfield, PA before heading to Chicago to raise money; and Obama is down in Chicago.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 39 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 53 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 235 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 312 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (88 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton vs. Obama: Earmark wars

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:06 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Obama released every request he's made since coming to the Senate. "Philippe Reines, a senior adviser to Clinton, said in an e-mail that she ‘will make public the requests she submits this year,’ though he did not say when that will happen. He noted that Clinton has announced the earmarks she has won, but he did not say whether she will match Obama's disclosure and reveal all of her requests. Obama has pledged to make Washington more transparent if he is elected president, and his campaign cast the disclosure as part of his call for more openness.”

“But Obama's list raised questions because it includes $8 million for a defense contractor that has ties to one of his most prodigious campaign fundraisers. According to the earmark disclosure, the money was for a project overseen by General Dynamics. Obama's Illinois finance chairman, James S. Crown, serves on the company's board of directors, and his family holds a sizable stake in the firm. Crown and his wife, Paula Crown, are members of Obama's national finance committee and have raised more than $200,000 for the campaign, according to Obama's campaign Web site."

The AP’s Calvin Woodward writes, “In kindergarten, you're not allowed to call anyone a monster or make fun of someone's middle name. But this is politics, in a land where freedom of speech is carved into the rock of the republic. And these are grown-ups with thick skins stretched over awesome amounts of self-esteem.” More: “A cycle of insult and puffy indignation has taken hold in the contest between Democratic Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, with supporters of Republican Sen. John McCain gleefully pitching in. It's been a time to denounce, dissociate, distance and regret, to nurse tender sensitivities, and to see the occasional offender cut from a campaign.”

The New York Daily News previews Iowa’s county conventions: “Remember Iowa? Suddenly, the state that started the 2008 race will matter again Saturday, and it could be the second time it kicks Hillary Clinton. The delegates chosen in the state's January caucuses to back Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards must show up at county conventions Saturday -- and they don't have to stick with their candidates. That means not only are the 14 delegates won by since-departed John Edwards up for grabs -- more than in all of Wyoming - so are Clinton and Obama backers.”
 
Obama and Clinton agreed to… ANOTHER debate. Debate 21 (!) will take place in Philadelphia next month -- date to be determined. Obama also agreed to a debate in North Carolina April 19.

DiscussDiscuss (28 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight: Wooing supers

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:04 AM by Domenico Montanaro

After lots of fanfare yesterday morning, the Florida Democratic Party’s mail-in plan looks like it may be DOA.

Meanwhile, “Michigan Democrats are close to an agreement with presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama to hold a do-over primary,” the AP reports. “The Clinton campaign made it clear that it strongly prefers a state-run primary to mail-in voting during the meeting, according to a campaign official speaking anonymously about the private talks.”

Clinton hosted uncommitted superdelegates (a.k.a. members of Congress) at her DC home on Wednesday night. "After the Clinton reception, Chris Haylor, a campaign official, sent out a memo listing the undecided lawmakers who had attended and asking for help with lobbying them. ‘We encourage you all to seek them out today and thank them for attending and to get their feedback,’ he wrote. ‘We want to make sure we strike while the iron is hot.’”

“Among those on Haylor's list were several Southerners (Rep. Robert E. ‘Bud’ Cramer of Alabama; Reps. Lincoln Davis and Bart Gordon of Tennessee; and Rep. Heath Shuler of North Carolina), as well as a handful of Californians (Reps. Susan A. Davis, Sam Farr and Bob Filner) an Oklahoman (Rep. Dan Boren) and an Arizonan (Rep. Gabrielle Giffords)."

DiscussDiscuss (18 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Revisiting SCHIP

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:03 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Boston Globe front-pages Clinton’s role in SCHIP: “Clinton, who has frequently described herself on the campaign trail as playing a pivotal role in forging a children's health insurance plan, had little to do with crafting the landmark legislation or ushering it through Congress, according to several lawmakers, staffers, and healthcare advocates involved in the issue.”

More: "In campaign speeches, Clinton describes the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, as an initiative ‘I helped to start.’ Addressing Iowa voters in November, Clinton said, ‘in 1997, I joined forces with members of Congress and we passed the State Children's Health Insurance Program.’ Clinton regularly cites the number of children in each state who are covered by the program, and mothers of sick children have appeared at Clinton campaign rallies to thank her.”

“But the Clinton White House, while supportive of the idea of expanding children's health, fought the first SCHIP effort, spearheaded by Senators Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, and Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, because of fears that it would derail a bigger budget bill. And several current and former lawmakers and staff said Hillary Clinton had no role in helping to write the congressional legislation, which grew out of a similar program approved in Massachusetts in 1996."

DiscussDiscuss (17 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Blue to red?

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:59 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Politico’s Martin writes how McCain’s campaign will try to turn some blue states red. “Though still very early in the planning stages, McCain aides have begun eyeing between 20 and 25 states that could be competitive, a list that includes some places that are anything but rock-ribbed conservative. Next month, they’ll make this case symbolically by sending the candidate on a different-kind-of-Republican tour into places where party members typically don’t tread.” 

McCain's earmark moratorium bill didn't pass, despite the support of both his potential Dem foes. What does it say that all three presidential candidates supported something that couldn't pass? That's future leadership ability, no? Then again, Congress loves its earmarks…

Per NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy, McCain spoke to reporters on his plane yesterday evening while on his way to Philadelphia for a fundraiser, telling about his day at the Senate, including a brief exchange of pleasantries with Sen. Clinton. He also weighed in on comments made by Obama about McCain’s shifting position on President Bush’s tax cuts. ”Well, it’s very clear that I voted to make those tax cuts permanent on several times,” McCain said. “Sen. Obama has stated very clearly his desire to increase America’s taxes… He wants to raise American’s taxes and put more of their money into the hands of the government. I want to keep it in the wallets and purses of the American people.”
 
For another dig at Obama, McCain commented on the Democrat’s decision to release his earmarks today, urging him to go further. “We urged him to do so,” McCain said. “Now, he has lots of money that he got in earmarks that have not been spent, so I hope that Sen. Obama will say that that earmark money should go back to the Treasury and in fact back to the taxpayers rather than on needless earmark pork-barrel projects which he has sponsored which we all know are incredible wastes of the taxpayers’ dollars. So give that money back to the taxpayers is my, is my strong recommendation both to Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (9 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Allaying Jewish concerns

Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:57 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Here is the Times’ front-page profile of Obama’s mother. It’s a fascinating read. “Though it is impossible to pinpoint the imprint of a parent on the life of a grown child, people who knew Ms. Soetoro well say they see her influence unmistakably in Mr. Obama.”

Obama didn't appreciate the Wayne Allard stunt that called for appropriating every Obama presidential proposal. Apparently Schumer called Allard an a**, though Allard said the amendment wasn't his idea. Obama apparently asked Allard, "You working this hard," Allard shot back: "Vote yes." Allard, by the way, didn't vote for his own amendment.

Obama continues to make efforts to allay Jewish concerns. "Barack Obama has a solid Senate record in support of Israel… Yet there is unease among some Jewish voters about the Illinois senator and Democratic presidential contender. Why? Part of it is a division between blacks and Jews that's been growing for years, a split that Obama has challenged fellow blacks to confront. Another element is the praise Obama has received from Black Muslim leader Louis Farrakhan, whose disparaging comments about Judaism are toxic to many voters. Obama's own pastor has a history of supporting Palestinian causes."

“Finally, there are rumors and outright lies about the candidate that have gained an audience through repetition in e-mails and on Web sites. Obama is working hard to win over this vocal, powerful and reliably Democratic voting bloc. Jews have accounted for about 4 percent of Democratic primary voters so far this year, and Clinton has held a 52-46 percent edge over Obama among them, according to exit polls.”

“On the day of the Mississippi primary this week, Obama took time to call Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to express condolences over the deadly terrorist attack on a rabbinical seminary in Jerusalem. He also reaffirmed his support for Israel's right to defend itself and for its commitment to negotiations with Palestinians and underscored the need to stop Iran from supporting terrorism or getting nuclear weapons. The effort by the candidate and his advisers to calm disquiet among Jewish voters began more than a year ago."

Where do Jews go if Obama is the nominee? How big of a problem is this for him? Does it put Florida in jeopardy if enough older Jewish voters end up going for McCain?

The New York Post looks at the comments made by Obama’s former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, “who stepped down from his post after 36 years, preaches a form of black liberation theology, stressing ties to Africa and ways to empower Chicago's struggling black community.”

DiscussDiscuss (24 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Ferraro: Time to move on

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:22 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
Geraldine Ferraro is hoping to put the controversy over her comments about Obama to bed, but puts the blame over the flare up squarely on the Obama campaign.
 
"I do think this was a mistake on part of the Obama campaign," she said in an interview with NBC affiliate WJAR in Providence, RI. "They didn't have to do this, and they did it to hurt Hillary. I just think that's bad. I think it's bad business, and I think it's bad politics. I was accused of being divisive. I think those tactics are divisive."
 
Saying she "was talking to the facts," Ferraro stressed she did not make a mistake and was not the one who brought up race in this primary fight. Instead, she continued to state her motivations behind her statements. "The enthusiasm that you get from the black community on this black candidate is wonderful, and I don't think you can deny it."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (83 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

June 3 Michigan re-vote is VERY possible

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:22 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
While the idea of Florica re-vote seems to be fading, there is a lot of momentum among Michigan Democrats for a June 3 re-vote, according to informed sources in the state. There are a couple of hurdles, including who would pay for the primary (100% Clinton donors or 50-50 split between Clinton and Obama donors; the preference of state Democrats). The state would pass a law that would appropriate the money to run this special primary election; not a mail-in, but a full bore in-person 100% open primary. The state, in turn, would be reimbursed by the Democratic Party or potentially other entities or even seeing if it's possible for donors to contribute to the state directly. Everyone seems to be on board in the state Democratic world of Michigan, including the governor, the Dingells, Carl Levin, the Kilpatricks and the U.A.W. For those that follow Michigan Democratic politics closely, you'll know getting all those folks in agreement isn't easy.

Also, there appears to be very little GOP resistance in the state legis. (or even the McCain campaign) from allowing this to happen. So, barring some major objection by the Obama folks (who are being briefed on this plan later today), the possibility of a Michigan re-vote on June 3 is very high. The only thing that could stop this primary logistically is if the state party is told, legally, they can't raise the large soft money contributions they would need to raise in order to come up with the $10-12 million.

All of this needs to be agreed to (including by the state legislature) in the next 10-14 days.

Ok, Florida, is the ball now in your court?

DiscussDiscuss (55 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton camp: Key(stone) to WH is PA

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:17 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
Pennsylvania counts -- a lot, the Clinton campaign stressed on a conference call with reporters.

“If Barack Obama can’t win there, how can he win the general election?” Chief Strategist Mark Penn asked, re-iterating the thesis of a memo the Clinton camp sent out yesterday. That memo was ridiculed by the Obama campaign in a response e-mail to the media, which line-by-line commented on and edited the Clinton memo.

“If someone on my staff wrote that I’d fire them,” said Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, a Clinton supporter who was also on the call.

All this comes on the heels of an Obama conference call yesterday when Obama Campaign Manager David Plouffe stressed, “This is not just about Pennsylvania. They [the Clinton campaign] are the prohibitive favorite in Pennsylvania. We will not be defined by Pennsylvania. We will try to get the most votes and delegates, but we won’t cherry-pick states.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, a Clinton surrogate also on the call, took humbrage. “Diminishing Pennsylvania is offensive,” he said.

Plouffe added in yesterday's call a famliar refrain for the Obama campaign: “This is a race for delegates.” He also stressed Obama will focus on, in addition to Pennsylvania, the other nine contests, including Indiana and North Carolina, which combined have more delegates at stake (187) than Pennsylvania (158).

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (91 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Rudy returns

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:13 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Matthew E. Berger


CAMP HILL, PA -- With McCain called back to Washington to vote in the Senate, Rudy Giuliani pitched in and headlined a $1,000-a-plate luncheon for the Arizona senator, and said he believed the Republicans can win Pennsylvania.

VIDEO: While campaigning for his former opponent, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani talks to reporters about the differences between the Arizona senator and his Democratic competitors.

“I would consider this for John a very doable state, a state he could win” Giuliani told reporters after the luncheon. “Someone like John McCain that has outreach to independent and to Democratic voters, this is a perfect state for him.” (Indeed, a recent Pennsylvania poll shows McCain leading both Clinton and Obama in the Keystone State.)

Asked about the potential of a McCain-Giuliani ticket, or even a McCain-Romney ticket, Giuliani demurred. “The choice of vice president is up to John McCain,” he said. “I’m sure he’ll make a very good choice. I’m not going to comment on that at all.”

No stranger to New York controversies, Giuliani said his thoughts were with the Spitzer family. “I feel great sadness for the governor and for his family and for his children,” he said. “He made a decision he believed was the right one, and I just pray for them.”

Although he didn't rule it out, Giuliani said he wasn’t thinking about running for governor himself in 2010. “I’m not considering running for anything right now,” he said. “I’m just back in my law firm, back in business, getting used to my private life, and it’s quote enjoyable. So I’m not thinking about running for anything right now.”

DiscussDiscuss (18 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Pelosi: Dream team unlikely

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:29 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Mike Viqueira
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said today that "a lifetime of political gut" tells her that an Obama-Clinton or Clinton-Obama ticket is not in the offing.

"Take it from me, that won't be the ticket."

She added that while she has no doubt that there will be a "dream team," it will not include both of the two principals currently battling it out. "I just don't think it's going to happen," she said.

She was asked to clarify remarks she made earlier in the week to school children in Boston, where she was quoted as calling the prospect "impossible."

She also expressed a bit of anxiety about the tone of the Democratic campaign.

DiscussDiscuss (53 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain's big guests in Philly

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:21 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Matthew E. Berger

Rudy Giuliani and Tom Ridge will be joining McCain at his Philadelphia fundraiser tonight, per the McCain campaign.

DiscussDiscuss (7 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Hillary's Razorback advantage

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:39 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
A new Arkansas-based poll shows Clinton with a significant general election advantage in a state where she spent much of her adult life. According to the poll, Clinton leads McCain in Arkansas, 51%-36%.

Meanwhile, Obama trails McCain in the state, 27%-43%.

Not surprisingly, Arkansas went for Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996. But Bush carried the state in 2000 and 2004.

DiscussDiscuss (31 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Judging the Florida Democratic Party

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:44 AM by Chuck Todd


From NBC's Chuck Todd
Last week, during an appearance on MSNBC's "Tim Russert," I made a declaration that Florida's Democratic Party was one of the worst in the country; a comment that raised the ire of many Democrats in the state of Florida.

I've been deluged with facts about the state of the party from 2004 forward. Admittedly, I based my declaration on the history of the party which thru 2004 was disastrous. When you compare the number of Democrats in the state with the number of elections the party won, it really was no contest, Florida's Democratic Party was clearly one of under-performers compared to other state parties. The party has struggled to regain its footing since the exits of Lawton Chiles and Bob Graham who dominated the Democratic scene for three decades.

Well, after pouring through the stats, the facts are not there right now to back up my claim that Florida is currently one of the worst state parties in the country. Now, the party still has a lot of work to do before the state party can be called one of the best but it appears since 2004, there's been improvement. There was a massive staff turnover in 2005 after the double-gut punches of losing the state for Kerry by a greater margin than Gore lost it and then Betty Castor losing an election in a campaign she won. (Many a candidate wins a campaign and loses the election; happens more often than you realize but the Republican ground game was just better than the Democrats and that was difference between winning and losing for Castor in that contest with Mel Martinez.)
CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (46 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama talks Spitzer, race, FL-MI

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:11 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Hudspeth and Mark Murray
In a media avail aboard his campaign plane, Obama answered questions on a host of issues, including Spitzer's resignation, race, re-votes in Florida and Michigan, and the upcoming campaign in Pennsylvania.

On Spitzer: "Obviously, it’s a tragedy. It’s heartbreaking for the family, but I suspect that it would not have been possible to function as governor, that what he said is right, that he needs to spend time healing himself and his family." Asked in a follow-up question whether Spitzer should be prosecuted, he replied: "You know, I won't offer an opinion on that."

On race becoming an issue in the Clinton-Obama contest: "As I said yesterday, I do think it's unfortunate. It's not entirely unexpected. You know, as I've said before, race and gender issues are very powerful in our society. They've been an organizing principle of our politics since the earliest days of our country. And so it would be naïve for me to think that we could just brush them aside. And I know that sometimes Sen. Clinton and others accuse me of being naïve, but I'm not naïve enough to think that we're going to solve the country's racial problems, and some of these other divisions in the span of six months or a year. What I do think is that our campaign has pointed towards the future, an era where these distinctions are less prominent in our politics."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (75 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Delegate update: Clinton gains 5 in CO

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:42 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
Clinton
picked up a net of five delegates of the remaining unallocated nine delegates in Colorado. Obama now wins a 35-20 split there.

The pledged delegate count has Obama leading: 1,400-1,251.
The superdelegate count has Clinton leading: 253-216.
The GRAND TOTAL stands at Obama leading: 1,616-1,504.

There are still 10 delegates unallocated from previously completed contests, including nine from the Texas caucuses (Texas is currently a 92-92 tie) and one from Democrats Abroad.

*** UPDATE *** (Thanks "Nevin Nolte, Cedar Rapids, Iowa" for pointing out the typo of the 254 for Clinton. It should be and now is 253 because of the Spitzer fallout.) 

*** UPDATE 2 *** For those wondering about California, NBC News already has a 203-167 split for Clinton. California's statewide results page had indicated a 207-163 split, but its county results page reflected the 203-167 total.

DiscussDiscuss (25 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: The great '08 paradox

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:17 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** The great ‘08 paradox: Perhaps the biggest takeaway from the latest NBC/WSJ poll is the poor shape the GOP finds itself in today: The party’s fav/unfav has increased (34%-49%); Bush’s approval rating remains in the 30s; a whopping 76% say they want a president who takes a different approach from Bush; and Democrats lead by double digits in generic presidential and congressional contests. On top of it all, for the first time since 1992, a plurality of registered voters (43%) believe they’re worse off than they were four years ago -- hardly a good sign for a party trying to hold onto the presidency. And yet … McCain seems like he’ll be more than competitive come November. He trails Obama by just three points (44%-47%) and Clinton two points (45%-47%). Also, while a surprising 52% of Republicans say they would have preferred a different GOP nominee, the crosstabs show Republican voters siding with him in general election match ups. And get this: Just 44% of Democrats have a negative view of him.

*** Style vs. substance: Clinton leads Obama on almost every individual issue the poll measured, but she trails him on electability (48% think Obama would have the better chance of beating McCain, versus 38% who think this of Clinton), favorability, and who is seen as the more “acceptable” candidate. Why the disconnect? Because style is often more important than substance in presidential politics. Kerry and Gore both led Bush on the issues, but how far did that get them? Indeed, this latest NBC/WSJ poll shows that more voters think a candidate’s leadership style and trustworthiness (48%) is more important than ideas and policies (32%) when asked to pick between the two. But that is hardly the only thing going on here. Obama has improved on eight of 10 attributes, including the commander-in-chief question (he trails Clinton here by just five points among Democrats). Clinton, on the other hand, has stagnated on nine out of 10 attributes and has dropped in the other: being likeable. Overall, Clinton leads Obama in the Dem horserace, 47%-43%, the closest it has ever been in the poll.

*** Compare and contrast: It’s also noteworthy that, according to the poll, Clinton’s and McCain’s top attributes among all voters are similar: being knowledgeable of the presidency, having strong leadership qualities, and being a good commander-in-chief. Yet McCain has higher scores on these attributes than Clinton does. On the flip side, McCain’s strengths are Obama’s weaknesses and vice versa. McCain’s worst attributes -- being likeable, being inspirational and exciting, and bringing real change -- are among Obama’s top categories. His worst categories: commander-in-chief, positions on the issues, and knowledge of the presidency. Do Democrats go for a nominee that covers a flank against McCain? Or capitalizes on one?

*** Legacy watch: Bill Clinton’s legacy has taken a real hit in the last year. In March 2007, his fav/unfav was 49%-35%. Now it’s a net negative: 42%-45%. His numbers have gradually gotten worse as the campaign has gone on. In November, it was 47%-40%; in January, it was 44%-41%, and now it’s 42%-45%. The reason? His support among African Americans and Obama voters has greatly eroded. Similarly, the poll shows that Obama voters have a more negative impression of Clinton than Clinton voters do of Obama.

*** Uniting the Dems: Nearly four in 10 Democrats believe the protracted primary is bad for the party, and just one in four think the long process is good. So this begs the question: Which of the two Democrats will have an easier time uniting the party? Well, according to the NBC/WSJ survey, Obama voters have a lower opinion of Clinton than Clinton voters have of Obama. Clinton's fav/unfav among Obama voters was 69%-17%; now it has decreased to 45%-33%. Meanwhile, Obama’s fav/unfav among Clinton voters was 55%-20%; now it’s pretty much the same at 53%-24%. Does this mean Obama voters have taken this campaign a lot more personally than Clinton's supporters? Or does this mean Obama's voters are more intensely loyal to their candidate than Clinton's? These are questions the superdelegates may end up debating amongst themselves at some point. 

*** Other interesting numbers in the poll: The percentage of respondents who correctly identified Obama as a Christian increased from 18% to 37%. But those identifying him as a Muslim also increased five points (from 8% to 13%). Fifty-eight percent said globalization has been bad for the country; just 25% said it has been good. Congress’ approval rating is at 19%. And just 14% view Nader in a positive light; 37% have a negative impression of him. The poll was conducted March 7-10 among 1,012 registered voters, and it has a 3.1% margin of error. 

*** Getting closer to a re-vote? According to the Washington Post, the Florida Democratic Party has set June 3 as the date for a possible mail-in do-over election. The party confirms the date to First Read, but cautions that nothing is set in stone, due to the fact that Florida Democrats are disagreeing about the particulars. But there are a lot of unanswered questions about how the election will be conducted, including if it passes muster with the Justice Department since Florida is a state that has to get pre-clearance for their elections, even party-run ones. South Carolina Democrats and Republicans have faced this issue in the past. By the way, Michigan also appears closer to coming up with some sort of re-vote compromise.

*** The Limbaugh effect: Want more proof that the liberal blogosphere has turned into a big-time ally for the Obama campaign? It has really begun to push the “Limbaugh Effect” story to explain why Republicans, per exit polls, have begun to break for Clinton in Ohio, Texas, and Mississippi. But let's not get carried away on this issue since all three states have Southern tendencies (yes, you Southern Ohio), meaning identity politics is more likely to trump everything else. Until there's an actual swing of Republicans voting for Clinton in a state without culturally Southern tendencies, then assume this so-called "Limbaugh effect" is nothing more than an urban myth.

*** The delegate count: Obama leads, 1,614-1,497. The NBC pledged number has Obama leading, 1,398-1,244. Clinton leads in superdelegates, 253-216.

*** On the trail: Clinton, McCain, and Obama are all in DC for Senate business today, although McCain later travels to Philly for a fundraiser there. Also, Bill Clinton holds fundraisers in New York and Michelle Obama campaigns in Pennsylvania.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 40 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 54 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 236 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 313 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (108 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton vs. Obama: Ferraro resigns

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:15 AM by Mark Murray

The Boston Globe covers Ferraro’s resignation yesterday from Clinton’s finance committee. “‘I am stepping down from your finance committee so I can speak for myself and you can continue to speak for yourself about what is at stake in this campaign. The Obama campaign is attacking me to hurt you. I won't let that happen.’”
 
“Earlier yesterday, the 1984 vice presidential nominee apologized to those who thought it racially insensitive for her to suggest that Obama wouldn't be the Democratic front-runner if he were not black. But she then declared: ‘It wasn't a racist comment. It was a statement of fact.’”

The New York Times uses the resignation as a peg to write how race has once again become an issue in the Clinton-Obama contest. “[R]ace, as well as sex, have been unavoidable subtexts of the Democratic campaign since the two candidates began seeking to be the first African-American or the first woman to lead a party’s presidential ticket. In the primaries and caucuses this winter, too, Mrs. Clinton has enjoyed substantial support from women, while Mr. Obama has increasingly drawn overwhelming votes from blacks."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (64 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The Delegate fight: Re-do on June 3?

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:13 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

The Florida Democratic Party’s mail-in primary plan could be unveiled as early as today. According to one memo obtained by the Washington Post, Election Day would officially be June 3. "In a document obtained by The Washington Post, dated yesterday, Florida Democratic Party Chairwoman Karen L. Thurman urged Florida's Democratic members of Congress, along with Clinton and Obama, to consider the vote-by-mail proposal carefully. ‘Because of the unprecedented nature of the national race, a situation that previously was a relatively minor, party-insider issue now has the potential to result in irreparable damage for years to come,’ she wrote, before detailing at length a mail-in-primary process.”

“Under her timetable, fundraising and a public comment period would begin today and end April 12, about when ballots go to production. Overseas and military ballots would be sent out April 19. Fifty temporary election offices would be set up May 1 in poor areas to ensure access to voters with mail difficulties. On May 9, the bulk of the ballots would be shipped out, and the election would officially be on June 3, a day shared with Montana and South Dakota."

The AP adds, however: Florida's nine Democratic congressmen voted Tuesday night to oppose a mail-in vote. Thurman urged them to reconsider.” Clinton's Florida surrogates and the Obama campaign also oppose the idea.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (53 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: SNL wars

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:12 AM by Mark Murray

So apparently Clinton is truly back in the game for the Dem nod. How do we know? The RNC sent out a fundraising email focused solely on Clinton, something the GOP committee hasn't done in over a month.

In her interview with NPR this morning, Clinton defended her role in the Northern Ireland peace process. She acknowledged that she was neither a principal negotiator nor at the negotiating table. But she described role as "instrumental."

Bad news for Clinton? Both the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times did stories about the speculation SNL is in the tank for Clinton. The show's writers and producers deny the charge and now the likelihood they over compensate is very likely. Per the New York Times: "The show did ask Mr. Obama to appear this week, and Mr. Downey wrote an editorial response for him to deliver, but the senator declined. ‘I hope it was scheduling and not because he hates us,’ Mr. Downey said."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (35 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Big Labor gearing up

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:11 AM by Mark Murray

The AFL-CIO unveiled its $53 million anti-McCain campaign yesterday. "The campaign will encompass 23 states, but the union, which has not endorsed a candidate in the Democratic primaries and caucuses, listed Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all key battleground states, as its top priorities."

The RNC’s Alex Conant responded to the labor group’s efforts this way: “Voters looking for something new will find it in John McCain’s campaign to help working families – not the AFL-CIO’s partisan attacks. The AFL-CIO’s campaign against John McCain clearly demonstrates their priorities lie in attack politics as opposed to focusing on American families. Considering Senators Obama and Clinton’s frequent denunciations of special interests, they must reject the unions’ campaign against Senator McCain.”

NBC's Kelly O'Donnell reports on McCain's extended comments yesterday on his veep search. McCain was asked if he will weigh friendship or a personal bond as a factor in his selection of a running mate. He said, "I don't think a personal bond is important. I think what's important is that you can work with the person." He said many people he sees are offering their own suggestions and deadpanned that "most of them are wrong."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (8 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Obama hearts Obama

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:10 AM by Mark Murray

Check out how the town of Obama, Japan is embracing the Illinois senator’s presidential bid.

DiscussDiscuss (10 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Congress: One thing they agree on

Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:09 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

Clinton, Obama, and McCain all support it: a one-year ban on congressional earmarks. But most of their colleagues -- including their leaderships and some of their closest supporters -- do not, NBC’s Ken Strickland reports. And when the measure comes up for a vote today on the Senate floor, the threesome will like find themselves on the losing side.

The measure, however, will meet stiff resistance on the Senate floor. Yesterday, Majority Leader Harry Reid called the effort "a publicity stunt." Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Democrat and Obama's No. 1 supporter, is also against it. As for McCain's pull among his GOP colleagues, fewer than ten publicly back the measure. Why? Strickland notes that most feel the Senate passed legislation last year that brought substantial reform to earmark process, making it more open and transparent. Others simply say the Constitution gives Congress the right to control spending -- all spending.

DiscussDiscuss (7 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Distancing from Ferraro, hitting Obama

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:50 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
The Clinton campaign sought to make it clear Wednesday that it did not agree with comments Geraldine Ferraro, a supporter and a former vice presidential candidate, has made to the effect that Obama would not be where he is today if he were not a black man.

"Let me make clear that we were completely unaware of Mrs. Ferraro's remarks, prior to their being made.” Communications Director Howard Wolfson said on a conference call with reporters in response to a question about whether this sort of thing might be a campaign tactic. “We did nothing in any way to encourage them. When Sen. Clinton spoke to them, she made clear that she disagreed with them and that she, in fact, rejected them and, look, as she said, there are supporters in both campaigns who have said things that the candidates disagreed with, that the candidates have rejected.

“It's important when that happens to make clear the disagreement, which we did immediately, and I think it is incumbent upon all of us to focus on the issues that matter most to the American people.”

When questioned about why the campaign hadn't taken a more aggressive approach to dealing with Ferraro, who is on the campaign's finance committee, but is not a paid staffer, Wolfson said different situations led to different responses and used the opportunity to instead talk about instances in which Obama supporters had said controversial things.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (91 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

New poll: Clinton up in PA

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:00 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Lauren Appelbaum
While a new poll among Pennsylvania voters shows Clinton leading by 18 points, both Obama and her lose to McCain in head-to-head match ups. According to the Strategic Vision (R) poll, which will be released tomorrow, Obama fares better in a contest with McCain.
 
In the Democratic contest in the Keystone State, Clinton leads Obama outright in Pennsylvania, 56%-38%.

But in hypothetical match ups for the general election, McCain is ahead of Obama, 47%-44%, with 9% undecided. Against Clinton, the Arizona Republican leads 48%-42%, with 10% undecided.

DiscussDiscuss (88 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The primary vs. general fallacy

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:55 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Mark Murray and Domenico Montanaro
The Clinton campaign put out a memo today asserting that “if Barack Obama can’t win [in Pennsylvania], how will he win the general election?”

The memo continues, ”Pennsylvania is of particular importance, along with Ohio, Florida and Michigan, because it is dominated by the swing voters who are critical to a Democratic victory in November.  No Democrat has won the presidency without winning Pennsylvania since 1948.  And no candidate has won the Democratic nomination without winning Pennsylvania since 1972.”

But, as one of us writes, there is a fallacy to this kind of argument that hasn’t received much attention: “Recent history shows that winning a state in the primary season -- no matter its importance on the map -- doesn’t guarantee success in the general election.

“In 2004, for example, John Kerry won early Democratic contests in Iowa, Arizona, and Missouri, but he fell short in all three states when pitted against George W. Bush. In 1992, Bill Clinton captured primaries in Florida and Texas, but lost those states in the general election.

"And in 1984 -- in a primary that has drawn parallels to the current Democratic race -- Walter Mondale secured the Democratic nomination over Gary Hart in part by winning large industrial states like Illinois, New York and Pennsylvania. But in the end, he wound up winning just one state against Ronald Reagan: his home state of Minnesota.
 
“The opposite also is true. There are numerous examples of candidates losing states during the primaries but then going on to win them in the general election. Bill Clinton, for instance, captured Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire in his 1992 contest against George H.W. Bush. But he lost all three in the primaries.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (156 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill heckled again

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
ERIE, Pa. -- Bill Clinton has gotten used to this by now.

Early on in an event in Northwest Pennsylvania, Clinton was beginning a regular line in his speech comparing the state of the nation now to when he was president in the 1990s. A young man then started shouting at the former president, repeating "1991 Bilderberg." After a moment or two, Clinton stopped trying to speak over him and acknowledged the heckler.

"Look, this is the deal, folks," he said. "All these people that are paranoid about the world come and scream at me everywhere."

The man said that if Clinton heard him out, he'd leave, so Clinton did so. But as he shouted about Bilderberg, NAFTA and the Trans-Texas Corridor, the crowd drowned him out with boos.

Eventually, Clinton rather calmly addressed the remarks of the heckler. "You said you would go if I answered the question," Clinton said. "All right, here's the answer."

He said he did attend the 1991 conference of global players at the invitation of Vernon Jordan. "To the best of my knowledge, NAFTA was not discussed by anybody in my presence," he said. "I was talking to people who happen to be from Europe who did not give a rip about NAFTA."

Clinton then gave a general defense of his role in NAFTA, saying he tried to get labor and environmental standards into that agreement, "but I couldn't because it was already negotiated when I got there." He also said that as president, he enforced trade laws more than the current Bush administration has.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (62 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bush wanted Fallon out?

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:25 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's John Yang
In her off-camera, on-the-record gaggle, White House Press Scretary Dana Perino denied that Admiral Fallon's departure indicated that the administration doesn't tolerate dissent. She called that "nonsense. The President welcome robust and healthy debate. ... The President is in no way asking that people not talk to the media," she said. (Save that last phrase for future reference.)

VIDEO: March 11: After being portrayed in Esquire magazine as "brazenly challenging" President Bush over a potential war with Iran, Adm. William Fallon said those words had become a distraction, forcing him to step aside as leader of Central Command. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.

On the other hand, she noted that Fallon participated in a weekly secure videoteleconference with the president and had "ample opportunity" to express himself privately.

Perino also clearly indicated that Bush wanted Fallon gone, repeatedly saying that he had asked Gates to handle "this matter" within the Pentagon. "He asked Secretary Gates to handle this in the Pentagon and it was," she said.

Timeline: Defense Secretary Gates called National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley Tuesday morning to tell him that Fallon was going and Hadley informed Bush before the president left for Tennessee.

DiscussDiscuss (45 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain on Romney, choosing a VP

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:53 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy and NBC's Kelly O'Donnell


On his campaign charter plane, McCain spoke to reporters about Romney’s comments in a television interview that aired last night where he said he would be “honored” to serve as McCain’s running mate.

When a reporter said that it sounded like Romney would be open to sharing the ticket with him, a smiling McCain said he understood that Romney had mentioned his interest in serving as running mate.

“I got that impression,” he said.

He went on to say that his campaign is “just starting the process.”

“We’ve had at least a hundred volunteers to lead the search effort for the VP candidate,” McCain said, smiling again, of supporters volunteering their advice. “Incredible acts of generosity and willingness to serve the country.”

In describing the campaign’s steps so far towards defining their VP selection process McCain predicted that they should have a process nailed down with the next “few days or a week.”

DiscussDiscuss (45 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Delegate update: the Spitzer effect

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:13 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
This is albeit gratuitously political, but as we noted in First Thoughts yesterday, Clinton loses a superdelegate with the Spitzer resignation. Here’s why:

Lt. Gov. David Paterson, who will take over the governorship, is already a Clinton superdelegate. State Sen. Joseph Bruno (R) will fill Paterson’s role as lieutenant governor, but since Bruno is a Republican, and there’s no provision in NYS to replace a lieutenant governor until the next election, Paterson will not be replaced as a superdelegate.

This brings Clinton’s superdelegate lead to 253-216.
The NBC pledged number has Obama leading, 1,398-1,244.
That brings the GRAND TOTAL to Obama ahead, 1,614-1,497.

VIDEO: March 12: Sen. Hillary Clinton tells supporters in Washington, D.C. that Florida and Michigan's Democratic delegates should be counted, either by honoring January's election results or by holding new contests.

*** UPDATE *** Pledged total has been corrected to reflect 1,398 for Obama. 1,394 was the total before the full Mississippi totals were factored in. (Thanks First Read commenter "Angel")

DiscussDiscuss (128 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Delegate update

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:00 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Obama leads Clinton 1,614-1,498.

That includes the NBC News pledged delegate total of Obama 1,398, Clinton 1,244 and the NBC superdelegate total of Clinton 254, Obama 216.

Obama won a 19-14 delegate split in Mississippi.

There are also 19 other delegates which have not yet been allocated from previously completed contests, including nine from the Texas caucuses, nine from Colorado and one from Dems Abroad.

DiscussDiscuss (67 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Spitzer resigns

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:56 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer resigned his post, effective Monday, March 17th.

VIDEO: March 12: New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer announces his resignation.

Spitzer has said he's "begun to atone" for his personal indiscretions with his wife and family and that he's deeply sorry for not living up to his own expections.

"For those who are given much, much is expected," Spitzer said, adding that he did not want his personal turmoil to get in the way of the state's governance.

In referring to his own administration, he said he now thinks of it as "what might have been."

The March 17th date, Spitzer said, was at the request of Lt. Gov. David Paterson.

DiscussDiscuss (42 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Spitzer to resign

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:55 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC's Mark Murray
Breaking News: Per the AP, "A top state official says New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer will resign effective Monday after being linked to a prostitution ring."

CNBC is reporting that Spitzer will announce his resignation at 11:00 am ET.

DiscussDiscuss (43 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Back to square one

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:24 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro

*** Back to square one? It took just two victories in one week -- including last night’s 61%-37% win in Mississippi -- for Obama to erase the net delegate gains Clinton picked up on March 4. Will the pattern repeat itself in the next two months? Clinton goes on to win Pennsylvania, but Obama negates that after victories two weeks later in North Carolina and Indiana. If so, how does Clinton change the dynamics and math of the race? Going back to Mississippi, Obama’s formula to success was the same as in other Deep South states he’s won. He beat her among African Americans, 92%-8%, while Clinton beat him among whites, 70%-26%. One other thing: The turnout was huge. More than 400,000 participated in the primary -- near the 460,000 Mississippians who voted for Kerry and Edwards 2004 in the GENERAL ELECTION! Is there a hidden vote here than Obama can tap into if he’s the nominee? Perhaps, but it will have to be greater than the nearly 700,000 who voted for Bush in 2004…

VIDEO: March 12: NBC's Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on indentity politics in the Mississippi primary results and the media's focus on Geraldine Ferraro's comments about presidential candidate Barak Obama.

*** The delegate count: Obama leads Clinton 1,610-1,496. That includes the NBC News pledged delegate total of Obama 1,394, Clinton 1,242 and the NBC superdelegate total of Clinton 254, Obama 216. Obama, so far, has a 15-12 delegate lead in Mississippi, with six delegates yet to be allocated (most of which will go to Obama). There are also 19 other delegates that have not yet been allocated from previously completed contests, including nine from the Texas caucuses, nine from Colorado and one from Dems Abroad. There are now 566 pledged delegates left, and Clinton needs 64% to overcome Obama's pledged delegate lead. Obama needs 46% of all remaining delegates (including undecided superdelegates) to get to 2025.

*** The popular vote: By winning by almost 100,000 votes in Mississippi yesterday, Obama increased his popular vote lead over Clinton to approximately 700,000. It’s Obama 13,402,903, Clinton 12,705,360. And now even if you include Florida and Michigan, Obama leads the popular vote. That total is Obama 13,979,117, Clinton 13,904,497. This is fitting a pattern for Obama: When he wins a state, he wins it by a large margin and pads his lead in delegates and votes; hen Clinton wins, she usually does so narrowly.

*** "I will stand my ground … and I won’t back down": This Ferraro controversy isn’t going away anytime soon. On ABC this morning, Ferraro once again stood by her earlier remark that the only reason why Obama is in the position he’s in is because he’s black. “Every time somebody opens their mouth [in the Clinton campaign], Bill Clinton-racist, Ed Rendell-racist,” Ferraro said this morning. “My concern is how I’ve been treated. I am absolutely offended… And to take it out on Hillary, because they can’t talk about the issues.” This will dominate the political news today (unless Eliot Spitzer chooses this day to resign as New York governor), and will force the Clinton campaign to once again respond to it. In pure political terms, however, does this controversy help Clinton with white voters in Pennsylvania? Of course, short-term gains for Clinton could be major long-term pains. Obama's campaign has taken pains to be a candidate for president who happens to be black rather than the black candidate for president. But these controversies sometimes force him to be the black candidate rather than just the candidate with a unique racial background.

VIDEO: March 11: Hillary Clinton says she does not agree with Geraldine Ferraro who said that if Barack Obama "was a white man he wouldn't be in this position." MSNBC's Contessa Brewer talks with NBC's Chuck Todd.

*** Florida, Florida, Florida: Fresh off the email this morning is a letter from Clinton manager Maggie Williams to Obama manager David Plouffe calling for the Obama campaign to do one of two things: 1) accept the Florida and Michigan results or 2) join them in calling for a re-vote. The Florida Democrats appear to be on the verge of submitting a new plan to the DNC for approval that would result in a mail-in primary election, something the Obama camp has already raised doubts about and something the Florida House Dems unanimously opposed last night. So what does Obama do? The campaign has been VERY cautious on this issue. Surprisingly, they haven't called for a re-vote, mostly because the last thing the campaign wants to do is give Clinton more contests to compete and therefore extend the race. But shouldn't Obama, who is made a lot of hay about the fact he's campaigned in every state and taken every contest so seriously, be on the side of a re-vote? Sure, at this point, winning Florida seems remote and who knows if Michigan Democrats can agree on anything. But there's a difference between playing not to lose and playing like you have nothing to lose. Clinton has nothing to lose because she's behind, so it's easy for her to be for a re-vote. Obama obviously has more to lose but how often does a prevent defense work in football or politics?

*** Ain’t too proud to beg: Romney told FOX yesterday: "I think any Republican leader in this country would be honored to be asked to serve as the vice presidential nominee, myself included.” He did something most veep wannabes don't do -- he admitted he want the job. Doesn't this guarantee he won't get the job now?

*** On the trail: Clinton is in DC, where she speaks to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in the morning and then to the National Newspaper Publishers Association in the evening; McCain stumps in yet another battleground state, this one that began his 2008 comeback -- New Hampshire; and Obama has a media availability in Chicago. Also, Bill and Chelsea Clinton campaign in Pennsylvania.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 41 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 55 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 237 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 314 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

DiscussDiscuss (131 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama's win in Mississippi

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:22 AM by Domenico Montanaro

OBAMA’S WIN IN MISSISSIPPI.
With 99% of precincts reporting, Obama defeated Clinton, 61%-37% (253,441 to 154,842).

The Clarion-Ledger: "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama carried a majority of Mississippi in Tuesday's primary, with significant wins in counties in southwestern and central Mississippi and in the Delta."

The Boston Globe: “Clinton and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, campaigned vigorously in Mississippi, but Obama's win was widely expected. Tellingly, neither candidate was anywhere near Mississippi yesterday while voters went to the polls. Both were campaigning in Pennsylvania, whose April 22 primary is the next big prize and where recent polls have shown Clinton leading by between 4 to 19 percentage points.”

The AP: “A quarter of whites said race was important to their votes, and they voted overwhelmingly for Clinton. Thirty-seven percent of blacks said race was important to their votes and nearly all voted for Obama.”

DiscussDiscuss (65 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton vs. Obama: Ferraro, Day 2

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:20 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The New York Times: "Reached at her home in Manhattan on Tuesday evening, she said that, in her original remarks, she was asked why there had been so much excitement about Mr. Obama’s candidacy. ‘And I said, “I think part of it is because he’s black,”’ she said. ‘People are excited about this historic candidacy. I am, too.’”

“But the Obama campaign ‘twisted’ her remarks, she said. ‘I am livid at this thing,’ she said. ‘Any time you say anything to anybody about the Obama campaign, it immediately becomes a racist attack.’ The Clinton campaign did not contact her on Tuesday, Ms. Ferraro said. ‘I don’t want them to reach out to me,’ she said. ‘I’m exercising my First Amendment rights. If they don’t like it, tough. I don’t intend ever to have anybody tell me that I can’t say what I want to say.’”

VIDEO: March 12: TODAY’s Matt Lauer talks with Barack Obama about comments by Geraldine Ferraro suggesting race as a factor in his campaign. Obama also weighs in on the Spitzer scandal.

More: "The Ferraro comments overshadowed an increasingly bitter dispute between the campaigns about the candidates’ qualifications to serve as commander in chief. On Tuesday, Greg Craig, a former official in the administration of President Bill Clinton, and now a vocal supporter of Mr. Obama, issued a blistering rebuttal to Mrs. Clinton’s assertions that she had been deeply involved in her husband’s foreign policy successes."

The Boston Globe recaps the spat yesterday over Ferraro’s words.

The New York Post: "Fresh racial slap at Obama."

DiscussDiscuss (49 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The delegate fight

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:15 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Washington Post looks at the potential superdelegate battle. "A core group of superdelegates and party leaders -- he mentioned former vice president Al Gore, former senator John Edwards and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson -- could come to the candidates and try to establish ground rules of decorum for the remaining contests. There would have to be a lot of advance work before any visible meeting, Ross says, because once there is a visible meeting an outcome is expected by the public. And if none is produced, that only reinforces the idea of chaos and intractability."

The New York Times’ Healy notes both campaigns are fighting over the definition of "winner" regarding their victories -- with Clinton's campaign making an Electoral College argument (because of their victories in some key big states) and Obama making a 50-state, new map argument (because of some of their victories).

Despite not having the support of the state's House Democrats, Bill Nelson and the Florida Democratic Party apparently are close to submitting a new mail-in primary plan to the DNC, the New York Times writes. "The state party would most likely submit the proposal to Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, by week’s end, said the spokesman, Dan McLaughlin. Mr. Nelson is a supporter of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.”

VIDEO: March 11: Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL, joins the Morning Joe team to argue for a re-vote in the Democratic primaries of Florida and Michigan.

“‘Unless Howard Dean changes his mind and seats the Florida delegation as apportioned by the January primary,’ Mr. McLaughlin said, ‘this is the most fair and inclusive way to allow Floridians to have their voices heard.’”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (47 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Discarding the IA playbook

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:13 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The Wall Street Journal examines Clinton's plan for Pennsylvania. "What it will not do is mimic the tactics it used in Iowa -- flying the candidate around on a ‘Hill-A-Copter’ that costs several thousand dollars a day to charter; spending more than $95,000 on sandwich platters for caucus-night parties; or paying an estimated $3,000 for 600 snow shovels and thousands of pounds of rock salt to clear sidewalks for caucus goers when the forecast didn't call for snow. Such expenses left the Clinton campaign hobbling into New Hampshire and led to Sen. Hillary Clinton's $5 million loan to her campaign in January.”

More: “Sen. Clinton is expected to host more interactive roundtable events to talk to voters about the economy -- an approach that paid off in Ohio, where people have similar economic concerns. In Iowa the campaign flooded the airwaves with statewide television ads. Given the size and diversity of Pennsylvania, the campaign could mostly rely on targeted ads in cheaper, local markets, particularly in smaller rural areas where Sen. Clinton is popular, aides say. Television ads may be used less in Philadelphia, for example, where the large black population gives Sen. Obama an edge and air time is costly. In places like Allentown and Harrisburg, which have large Latino populations, ads may emphasize Sen. Clinton's appeal to Latinos."

The Philadelphia Inquirer: "With a full six weeks to go before the Pennsylvania primary, Sen. Hillary Clinton drew nearly 4,000 standing, shouting, chanting supporters to a rally on the Temple University campus last night. A clearly energized Clinton gave a rousing populist speech that hammered President Bush and didn't include some pointed attacks she'd leveled earlier in the day at her rival, Sen. Barack Obama."

The AP fact-checks Clinton’s claims on Obama and energy. She routinely says that he voted for the “Dick Cheney” energy bill. “Both sides refer to votes on an energy bill Congress passed in 2005. In the Senate, Clinton voted against the bill and Obama voted for it. It is a stretch to call it ‘Dick Cheney's energy bill,’ a hot-button reference for many Democrats. Although the House bill was framed according to the vice president's energy priorities, by the time it passed the Senate many of those measures, such as drilling in an Arctic wildlife refuge, had been stripped away. Its broad new benefits for nuclear power and the coal industry mirrored Cheney's priorities, however.
 
“Although opposed by environmentalists, many Democrats viewed the final bill as the best compromise that could be achieved in a GOP-controlled Congress. Clinton at the time said she opposed the bill because it did not do enough to cut reliance on foreign oil and address global warming. Clinton's claim that the bill ‘was loaded with new tax breaks for oil companies’ also overstates the case.”

DiscussDiscuss (62 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: The 'big dog'

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:10 AM by Domenico Montanaro

Mitt Romney told FOX, "I think any Republican leader in this country would be honored to be asked to serve as the vice presidential nominee, myself included.” He also “called Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ‘Chihuahuas’ and McCain the ‘big dog’ on national security.

The Washington Post: "[A] $35 billion contract has been awarded to Europe's Airbus consortium to build the latest generation of tanker planes. The decision has sparked anger from Boeing's congressional supporters and critics of outsourcing. It has also focused attention on McCain's reliance on lobbyists in his campaign for president because his finance chairman and several other top advisers lobbied for Airbus last year when it was in fierce competition with Boeing for the Air Force contract.”

“McCain has spoken out for years against the influence of special interests in Washington, but his campaign includes a number of prominent Washington lobbyists, including campaign manager Rick Davis, who founded a lobbying firm, and top political adviser, Charles R. Black Jr., chief executive of a well-known Washington firm. Neither of them lobbied for Airbus."

"McCain finance chairman Thomas G. Loeffler and Susan E. Nelson, who left Loeffler's lobbying firm to be McCain's finance director, both began lobbying for Airbus's parent company in 2007, Senate records show. William L. Ball III, a former secretary of the Navy and frequent McCain surrogate on the trail, also lobbied for Airbus, as did John Green, who recently took a leave from Ogilvy Public Relations to serve as McCain's legislative liaison."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (25 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Downplaying PA expectations

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:09 AM by Domenico Montanaro

OBAMA: Downplaying PA expectations
The AP takes a look at how Obama is managing expectations for Pennsylvania. "Obama's revised strategy is, essentially, a mathematical calculation. If Clinton wins a few more delegates than he does in Pennsylvania, Obama figures, he can offset them in the nine states and territories scheduled to vote later. His current lead of roughly 100 delegates would stay about the same, the thinking goes. That would position him to tell the all-important superdelegates this summer there is no justification for them to tip the nomination to Clinton."

More: "With 42 days left before the April 22 Pennsylvania primary, Obama has time to conduct such saturation campaigning. Clinton must win Pennsylvania to make her case to superdelegates. Rather than go for the knockout punch, however, the Obama campaign is playing down expectations, emphasizing the need to keep campaigning in other states, and portraying Pennsylvania as clearly favorable to Clinton. ‘It's an uphill fight for us,’ David Axelrod, Obama's chief media strategist, said in an interview. ‘It's a mistake to reduce the contest to one state.’”

VIDEO: March 11: Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., talks to Hardball’s Chris Matthews about his Mississippi primary win and his plans to topple Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in the 2008 race. 

The only thing about this strategy along with the hesitance by Obama to embrace the re-votes in Michigan and Florida is that there is a cautious, playing not to lose, rather than playing to win. Do cautious presidential candidates win elections? Or should Obama be more aggressive about Pennsylvania or more aggressive about embracing the re-vote in Michigan and Florida, even if there is a risk of giving Clinton a few more lifelines?

DiscussDiscuss (37 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Spitzer fallout

Posted: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:05 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The New York Times’ lead: “State government remained paralyzed on Tuesday as Gov. Eliot Spitzer, reeling from revelations that he had been a client of a prostitution ring, was engaged in an intense legal and family debate about whether to resign or, as aides said his wife was urging, to stay on. Mr. Spitzer did not emerge from his apartment at Fifth Avenue and 79th Street in Manhattan as Albany remained roiled and riveted by the deepening crisis.”

The Times’ editorial page says Spitzer “has now twice violated his obligations to the people of New York. He violated their trust when, according to law enforcement officials, he patronized a prostitution ring. He compounded that violation Tuesday by hiding in his Fifth Avenue apartment and refusing to explain his actions or his future plans. To put it bluntly, Mr. Spitzer must either resign immediately or explain why he deserves to continue in office. It is almost impossible for us to imagine how he can survive this scandal and provide the credible leadership that his state needs.” 

VIDEO: When will New York’s governor, Eliot Spitzer -- caught up in a prostitution scandal -- resign? TODAY’s Natalie Morales reports.

The Washington Post's Baker wonders if Spitzer's troubles will hurt Clinton. "Now, his apparent involvement with a prostitution ring has not only distracted attention from her efforts to take down the front-runner, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), it has also brought back unhelpful memories of her own husband's dalliances in office. There on cable television again were pictures of Bill Clinton hugging Monica S. Lewinsky. And the image of Spitzer's wife standing painfully by his side while he acknowledged unspecified wrongdoing could not help but remind some of Hillary Clinton's own stand-by-her-man moment."

The Boston Globe: “As New York Governor Eliot Spitzer weighs his political future after being accused of patronizing a high-priced prostitute, Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton is faced with an awkward choice: Call for the resignation of a fellow Empire State Democrat and raise comparisons with her own husband's behavior as president, or keep quiet and risk the appearance of condoning Spitzer's alleged offense.”

The New York Daily News: “It was a double whammy of a day for Hillary Clinton, who got pounded at the polls in Mississippi as Gov. Spitzer's mushrooming sex scandal brought ugly headlines reminiscent of her husband's philandering.”

DiscussDiscuss (20 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain defends role in Pentagon process

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:31 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
ST. LOUIS, MO -- McCain kicked off a heavy week of fundraising with a dinner last night and a town hall this morning at Savvis, Inc. where he faced several questions about the Pentagon's recent decision to pass over Boeing for a major defense contract.

Speaking within just a few miles of the city's Boeing factory, McCain defended his role in the process, but said that if deemed necessary he would be open to a thorough review of the Pentagon's selection.

"I think my record is very clear on this issue, including a paper trail of letters that we wrote to the Department of Defense during this process saying clearly and unequivocally we just want a fair process and we don't want a repeat of the previous process," McCain said about his involvement.

McCain added, "I'm more than willing to go through a review process--of what the process that was pursued by the United States Air Force in making that decision."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (44 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Bill: Hill needs 'big, big victory' in PA

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli
CANONSBURG, Pa. -- After a rare two-day hiatus, Bill Clinton returned to the campaign trail today in Pennsylvania, a state he promised that his family expects to cover “like a wet blanket between now and April 22.” The former president again set the bar for his wife’s campaign, saying, “She’s got to win a big victory” in the Keystone State.
 
“If she wins a big, big victory in Pennsylvania, I think it’ll give her a real big boost going into the next primaries,” he said in a crowded senior center in this Western Pennsylvania town. “We’re gonna have primaries in Indiana, North Carolina, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon, Montana, South Dakota and Puerto Rico. So we’re heading around the bend there, and I think I feel good about it. But I think just as I felt she had to win in Texas and Ohio -- and she did, and won handily -- I think she’s got to win a big victory in Pennsylvania. I think if she does, she can be nominated, but it’s up to you.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (140 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama wins Mississippi

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:20 PM by Mark Murray

NBC News declares Barack Obama as the projected winner in Mississippi's Democratic primary.

DiscussDiscuss (114 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama leading in Mississippi

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:00 PM by Mark Murray

NBC News will declare the Mississippi Democratic primary as "too early to call." But Barack Obama is leading.

DiscussDiscuss (43 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Ferraro vigorously defends remarks

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:25 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Geraldine Ferraro defended her remarks and went even further in another interview with the Daily Breeze, where Ferraro's original comments appeared. This time SHE claimed to be the victim of racism and said, "Sexism is a bigger problem." ...

"But far from backing off from her initial remark, Ferraro defended it and elaborated on it.

" 'Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let's address reality and the problems we're facing in this world, you're accused of being racist, so you have to shut up,' Ferraro said. 'Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?'...

"Ferraro said she was simply stating an obvious truth, as seen in exit polls that show Obama taking as much as 80 percent of the black vote in the Democratic primaries.

" 'In all honesty, do you think that if he were a white male, there would be a reason for the black community to get excited for a historic first?' Ferraro said. 'Am I pointing out something that doesn't exist?' ...

"She also said she is familiar with [Obama adviser David] Axelrod from his work for minority candidates in New York.

" 'He knows damn well that the best thing to do in a situation like this is to come back and hit with race,' Ferraro said, adding that the response is a sign that the Obama campaign is 'worried' about the first-term senator's lack of experience.
Ferraro said she was not trying to diminish Obama's candidacy, and acknowledged up front that she would not have been the vice presidential nominee in 1984 if she had been a man.

"But she also echoed remarks of feminist leaders like Gloria Steinem, who argued in the New York Times that Obama would not have succeeded if he were a woman because gender is 'the most restricting force in American life.'

" 'Sexism is a bigger problem,' Ferraro argued. 'It's OK to be sexist in some people's minds. It's not OK to be racist.'"

(Hat tip to First Read commenter Phyllis, Mystic, CT for finding the article.)

(And thanks to Pat, Davis, CA for this YouTube link of Ferraro defending the comments on Fox News.)

DiscussDiscuss (461 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Ferraro context

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:51 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's David Gelles
I just spoke to reporter Jim Farber, who wrote the Ferraro story for the "Daily Breeze" of Torrance, Calif. He told me the Ferraro interview took place on Feb. 28th, five days before the Ohio and Texas primaries. The article ran in the paper on March 7th. 

But it's important to remember that Ferraro made her comments at the time when many thought the Clinton campaign was about to go under.

The article ran with the headline, "Geraldine Ferraro lets her emotions do the talking."

This is the quote the campaigns are fighting over:

"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," she continued. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept." Ferraro does not buy the notion of Obama as the great reconciler.

Farber says the parentheses "(of any color)" is a direct quote.

DiscussDiscuss (124 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The Ferraro back and forth

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:46 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
As the fallout from the Geraldine Ferraro back and forth continues, here's a chronology of some of the comments and statements from both sides:

Geraldine Ferraro, Torrance Daily Breeze, March 7:
"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

The Clinton campaign's Howard Wolfson this morning to Politico:
"We disagree with her."

Obama adviser David Axelrod, in a conference call with reporters today:
“Ferraro should be denounced and censured by the campaign. Samantha [Power] resigned, because it was not consistent with the kind of campaign we want to run. We want a candidate and president who will live by their words.”

Hillary Clinton in Pennsylvania today:
"I do not agree with that. It is regrettable that any of our supporters on both sides, because we’ve both had that experience, say things that kind of veer off into the personal. We ought to keep this on the issues. There are differences between us. There are differences between our approaches on health care, on energy, on our experience, on our results that we’ve produced for people. That’s what this campaign should be about."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton this afternoon after Clinton's statement:
"With Senator Clinton's refusal to denounce or reject Ms. Ferraro, she has once again proven that her campaign gets to live by its own rules and its own double standard, and will only decry offensive comments when it's politically advantageous to Senator Clinton. Her refusal to take responsibility for her own supporter's remarks is exactly the kind of tactic that feeds the American people's cynicism about politics today and it's why Barack Obama's message of change has resonated so strongly in every corner of the country."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (105 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Fallon resigns Pentagon post

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:38 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
The top U.S. Commander for Iraq and Afghanistan, Admiral William “Fox” Fallon, resigned today, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in a news conference minutes ago. As NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski reported this morning on the NBC News blog Field Notes, “The Pentagon sharks [were] circling ... Fallon for a magazine interview in which he appears to openly criticize President Bush on the administration's Iran policy. The very public comments raised speculation Fallon would either volunteer or be forced to resign."

Per AP, "Gates said Fallon had asked him Tuesday morning for permission to retire and Gates agreed. Gates said the decision was entirely Fallon's and that Gates believed it was 'the right thing to do.'" Gates also denied that Fallon's position on Iran policy was any different than that of the president's, despite the current issue of Esquire Magazine , which "portrays Fallon as the one person in the military or Pentagon standing between the White House and war with Iran," Miklaszewski writes. "The article credits Fallon with 'brazenly challenging his commander in chief' over a possible war with Iran, which Fallon called an 'ill-advised action,' and implies Fallon would resign rather than go to war against Iran.

“Asked on Monday whether Defense Secretary Robert Gates still has full confidence in Fallon, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell would only say that Fallon 'still enjoys a working -- a good working relationship with the Secretary of Defense.'  

“Although reporters did not specifically ask about a possible Fallon resignation, Morrell freely offered, 'Admiral Fallon serves at the pleasure of the president.' That’s not exactly a ringing endorsement, but far from a political death knell.

“Still, the gruff, outspoken CENTCOM commander has his detractors. 'How many times can [Fallon] get away with these kinds of remarks,' before he's forced out the door, asked one senior Pentagon official. The reason may be that on Iran, Gates and many senior military officials happen to agree with Fallon.

DiscussDiscuss (83 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama camp responds to Ferraro

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:58 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
The Obama campaign called for Geraldine Ferraro to step down as a member of the Clinton campaign’s finance committee for comments she made suggesting Obama’s race is why he’s a leading presidential candidate.

"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," Ferraro told Torrance CA’s Daily Breeze Friday as we and others reported this morning. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

The Clinton campaign had this response: "We disagree with her," Spokesman Howard Wolfson told Politico.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), called Ferraro a “good friend” and credits her with “clearing a path” for women, but added that “In the heat of the campaign though things get said that shouldn’t. It’s disappointing that Clinton supporters have tried to diminish” Obama. “To suggest that he’s getting preferential treatment” because of his race, she sad, “is out of line. I urge Sen. Clinton to call on advisers and supporters to change the tone of their campaign.”

Axelrod said the Clinton campaign’s response was not enough and that “she ought to be removed” from any responsibilities she has on the campaign’s finance committee or in any other way related to the campaign.

“Ferraro should be denounced and censured by the campaign,” Axelrod said. “Samantha [Power] resigned, because it was not consistent with the kind of campaign we want to run. We want a candidate and president who will live by their words.”

*** UPDATE *** Clinton responded to Ferraro's comments

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (146 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Hillary on the attack in PA

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:05 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- After kicking off her Pennsylvania campaign with a positive speech to an energetic crowd in the northeastern part of the state yesterday, Hillary Clinton brought the fight against Obama here to the capital on Tuesday, hitting her rival on energy policy, NAFTA and Iraq and reprising her campaign's latest attack theme that paints him as a man of talk and not action.

Moments before the event was scheduled to begin in a packed auditorium here, the theme to "Rocky" blasted through the speakers, that classic movie about a fighter that was set in the Keystone State. The New York senator portrays herself as a leader who is ready to fight to get things done.

Today, she began by linking the wisdom of the nation's founders to her campaign.

"Right out of Pennsylvania came so much of the genius that created our government," she said, "and it was a unique combination of the lofty goals and values that kept us looking toward a better tomorrow and an understanding of what it would take. I think we're at a turning point moment in American history right now where we are called upon to look toward the future with confidence and optimism, but to understand what it will take, the hard work to translate all of those hopes and dreams into the reality of people's lives right here in Harrisburg. That is what my campaign is about."

And she continued the hope versus hard work theme she's been highlighting for months now, as she spoke about making a better future for America's children.

"We can't just hope that it happens," she said. "We can't just wish it happens. We can't just gaze heavenward and cross our fingers that it happens. We have to be prepared to work for that future. That's going to require, first and foremost, a new president in the White House."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (242 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Who is David Paterson?

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:51 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC's Chris Donovan
Just in case Gov. Eliot Spitzer at any point does end up resigning, here's a little nugget about the history that would be made with Lt. Gov. David Paterson taking office:

IF David Paterson, who is also legally blind, is sworn in, he would become the first African-American governor of New York, but also only the FOURTH African-American governor of a U.S. state in history. Of the previous three, two of the governors were elected (Deval Patrick and Douglas Wilder) and one ascended from his position as lieutenant governor because of scandal (P.B.S. Pinchback).

- Gov. Deval Patrick (Massachusetts) became governor in January 2007 after being elected in November 2006; he is currently the only African American to serve as governor of a U.S. state.

- Gov. Douglas Wilder (Virginia) became governor in January 1990 after being elected in November 1989; he was the first African American to be elected governor.

- Gov. Pinckney Benton Stewart Pinchback (Louisiana) became the first African-American governor in American history in December 1872; he was the president of the state senate and took over the job as lieutenant governor when the occupant of that office died in 1871, and then a year later he became governor after then-governor Henry Clay Warmoth was impeached and suspended; Pinchback served for five weeks between December 1872 and January 1873, at which time Warmoth's term expired

Here is Paterson's official bio:

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (62 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Reports: Spitzer to resign

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:50 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC’s Robert Windrem
The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and the Albany Times Union are reporting that New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D) will resign after being linked to a prostitution ring.

NYT: “Top aides to Gov. Elliot Spitzer said Tuesday morning that they expect the governor to resign his office, although the timing of the resignation remains uncertain.”

Video: NBC's Mike Taibbi reports on New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer facing calls to resign amid a sex scandal.

WSJ: “Eliot Spitzer, the onetime nemesis of Wall Street now engulfed in a sex scandal, is likely to resign, perhaps as early as today, according to a person close to him. The resignation would effectively end Mr. Spitzer's political career just 16 months after he was elected New York's governor by a wide margin. ‘But first he's dealing with this personal tragedy at home,’ this person said.”

The Albany Times-Union: “Spitzer publicly apologized to his wife and family Monday and began planning to exit his office in shame as both his life and political career were unraveling over his role as a patron of an international sex ring, according to government sources. Aides close to Spitzer, 48, expect Lt. Gov. David Paterson, 53, a Harlem Democrat, will succeed him as governor before the week's end to fill out the remaining 33 months of his term.”

DiscussDiscuss (92 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Dems to focus on 'jobs, jobs, jobs'

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:44 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From NBC’s Wendy Jones
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Flanked by an ironworker and green-energy company official, several members of Congress talked this morning about Democratic budget priorities.

As Sen. Debbie Stabenow put it, last year the focus was on college education, children's health insurance and veterans' health care: this year it's "jobs, jobs, jobs." Especially green-collar jobs. "If we want to have the vehicle of the future...to meet CAFE standards...we need battery storage...China, Korea and Japan are funding these advanced battery initiatives at hundreds of times the rate we are...."

Coming from Michigan, Stabenow noted: "Ford created the first hybrid, the Ford Escape...but they had to go to Japan for the battery. We don't want to change from dependence on foreign oil to dependence on foreign batteries."

Sen. Ted Kennedy warned that "In all the time I've been in the Senate, I've never seen the kind of anxiety I am seeing now among American workers...they've worked hard, they've played by the rules...they've volunteered to go to Iraq and Afghanistan, and now they face the perfect storm and wonder who is going to do something about it."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (63 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

RNC: Mississippi won't be in play

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:40 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

From NBC's Mark Murray
The Republican National Committee disagrees with our speculation earlier this morning that Mississippi could be in play in the general election if Obama becomes the Dem nominee.

Demographically, Obama might have some advantages in the state, RNC spokesman Alex Conant tells First Read. But ideologically, Conant adds, Obama will have a tough time in Mississippi. "It hasn't gone Democrat in over 30 years," he said. 

DiscussDiscuss (121 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Hillary to fire back

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:20 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Andrea Mitchell
A day after Obama hit Clinton hard in Mississippi, she is going to return the favor in Pennsylvania. Clinton is going to hammer Obama this afternoon in Harrisburg, Pa., according to prepared speech excerpts released by her campaign.

She will go after him on issues that started to work for her in Ohio, and the campaign thinks could have similar impact on voters in Pennsylvania -- NAFTA, Iraq, Energy and being true to his promises.

Examples show she's following up on the Goolsbee-Canadian government issue and on Samantha Power. See below:

"The true test comes when it's time to match rhetoric with results,” Clinton will say. “And unfortunately, we've seen that Senator Obama's promises and speeches are often just words." …

"On the campaign trail, Sen. Obama talks about clean energy. But in the Senate, he voted for Dick Cheney's energy bill loaded with new tax breaks for oil companies. When he faced a tough choice, his support for a clean energy future turned out to be just words." …

*** UPDATE *** The Obama campaign responds

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (67 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama camp questions HRC's experience

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:59 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC's Mark Murray
In one of its sharpest rebukes of Clinton's foreign policy experience, the Obama campaign has released a memo arguing that Clinton herself hasn't passed the commander-in-chief test. "When your entire campaign is based upon a claim of experience, it is important that you have evidence to support that claim. Hillary Clinton’s argument that she has passed “the commander-in-chief test” is simply not supported by her record," Obama adviser Greg Craig says in the memo.

"There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton played an important domestic policy role when she was first lady," Craig continues. "It is well known, for example, that she led the failed effort to pass universal health insurance. There is no reason to believe, however, that she was a key player in foreign policy at any time during the Clinton Administration.  he did not sit in on National Security Council meetings. She did not have a security clearance.  She did not attend meetings in the Situation Room. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy, nor did she have her own national security staff. She did not do any heavy-lifting with foreign governments, whether they were friendly or not. She never managed a foreign policy crisis, and there is no evidence to suggest that she participated in the decision-making that occurred in connection with any such crisis. As far as the record shows, Senator Clinton never answered the phone either to make a decision on any pressing national security issue -- not at 3 AM or at any other time of day."

Below is the full memo...

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (66 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

First thoughts: Albany shocker

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:27 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Albany Shocker: The Spitzer story is something that is simply shocking. But like the other recent sex scandals -- Vitter’s and Craig’s -- this one is likely to have very little national effect, unless Spitzer decides to stay in office. Assuming a fairly quick resignation, this will fade into being only a fascinating New York City/Albany story with a new star being born, Lt. Gov. David Paterson, who would become governor. The trouble only starts if Spitzer won't go, then he risks having prominent New Yorkers like Hillary Clinton being forced to call for his resignation and putting him in an even more precarious position. By the way, for those wondering, Spitzer is a superdelegate, as is Paterson. Both have endorsed Clinton. Should Spitzer resign, the number of superdelegates will simply be subtracted by one, since there's no provision in New York for a lieutenant governor to be replaced until the next election.

Video:  NBC's Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on the likelihood N.Y. Gov. Eliot Spitzer will resign; plus Barack Obama-Hillary Clinton battle.

*** The Magnolia match up: Can Obama win yet another state and pick up some more momentum heading into Pennsylvania? Could he win by such a margin that he erases the net delegates Clinton gained from her victories last week? Or can Clinton pull off the upset in a state Obama is favored to win? We’ll find out the answers to these questions in today’s Mississippi primary, where 33 pledged delegates are at stake. Polls open at 8:00 am ET and close at 8:00 pm ET.

*** Turning Mississippi blue? Take a look at Alabama (Obama won it by 14 points), Georgia (by 35 points), Louisiana (by 21 points) and South Carolina (by 28 points), and you'll get an idea about Obama's likely margin of victory. Frankly, if Clinton keeps Obama under 15 points, she may have a moral victory. That said, it wouldn't be surprising if Obama won by 20-plus points considering the makeup of Mississippi's electorate. In fact, Mississippi is one of those rare Southern states that might be in play in the general election if Obama becomes the nominee. One Dem statistician tells First Read that there are three red states that could swing if African-American turnout was ever maximized (both in registration and in actual turnout): Georgia, Louisiana and, yes, Mississippi. So don't assume this is just one of those untouchable red states for the Dems when watching returns roll in tonight. 

Video: NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports on the Democratic battle today in Mississippi's primary.

*** Veep chatter: The big Clinton-Obama story yesterday was Obama pushing back against the idea that he would be Clinton’s vice president. Interestingly, Clinton supporter Ed Rendell seemed to backtrack a bit more than anyone else in the Clinton campaign when he admitted that he thinks Clinton would make a good veep for Obama. "It would be great and either way,” he said, per NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones. He added: "Whether it was Sen. Obama for the president and Sen. Clinton for vice president or vice versa. I think it would be great." While many analysts have picked up on this Clinton storyline as proof Clinton is trying to diminish Obama, don't assume this isn't ALSO an attempt by the Clintons to remind Obama that she should be considered for the veep slot if he's the nominee. It appears more likely every day that Clinton's Plan B is the VP slot, not Senate majority leader as so many others have speculated.

*** When surrogates attack: As Samantha Power’s “monster” comment to the Scotsman taught us, sometimes a remark by an adviser/surrogate to a fairly untraditional media outlet can produce a political firestorm. Will this statement by Clinton supporter Geraldine Ferraro spark a similar controversy? "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," Ferraro told Torrance CA’s Daily Breeze. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept." The Clinton campaign quickly distanced itself from this comment, because this is a slippery slope argument that could be demeaning to both Clinton and Obama.

*** Obama playing offense: Yesterday, Obama resurrected the Somali garb story, accusing the Clinton campaign of leaking the photo that made its way to Drudge, NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan notes.  Obama said, "… when in the midst of a campaign you decide to throw the kitchen sink at your opponent because you're behind and your campaign starts leaking photos of me when I'm traveling overseas, wearing, in native clothes of those folks to make people afraid." Obama was very matter of fact about this -- the first time he's been this way on a story that hasn’t proven to be true.

*** The Rezko headache: Obama’s name came up tangentially at the Rezko trial yesterday -- regarding nominations to an Illinois health planning board. At a minimum, Obama's name is being mentioned just enough that the trial is going to provide a blueprint for some reporters to write some negative stories about Obama. 
 
*** On the trail: Clinton, in Pennsylvania, stumps in Harrisburg and Philadelphia before returning to DC later in the evening; McCain is in the potential battleground state of Missouri, campaigning in St. Louis; and Obama holds a town hall in Fairless Hills, PA.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 42 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 238 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 315 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.    

DiscussDiscuss (73 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Spitzer's sex scandal

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:24 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: ,

The New York Times reports, “Gov. Eliot Spitzer continued to weigh whether to resign Tuesday, a day after law enforcement officials said he was a client of a high-end prostitution ring broken up last week by federal authorities. Mr. Spitzer was receiving counsel from his advisers late Monday at his Fifth Avenue apartment, and had not emerged as of early Tuesday morning.”

The New York Times editorial page stopped just short of calling for his resignation. “He did not just betray his family in a private matter. He betrayed the public, and it is hard to see how he will recover from this mess and go on to lead the reformist agenda on which he was elected to office.”

Per WNBC's Jay Dedapper, multiple New York Democratic Senate and Assembly sources say Eliot Spitzer WILL resign soon, certainly by the end of the week. They say a transition team is already in the process of being assembled, and several judges have been approached about presiding over a swearing-in ceremony. The sources say Spitzer has been urged to step down "for the good of the party.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (24 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton vs. Obama: Veep this

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:22 AM by Mark Murray

Obama yesterday pushed back on the veep chatter. "Calling Clinton's tactics an attempt ‘to bamboozle you, to hoodwink you,’ Obama said voters had to make a choice. ‘I want everybody to be absolutely clear,’ he said. ‘I don't want anybody here thinking that somehow, “Well, you know, maybe I can get both.” Don't think that way. You have to make a choice in this election.’”

The Boston Globe adds, “Obama yesterday ridiculed recent suggestions by Hillary Clinton and her top supporters that he might make a good running mate as part of a so-called Democratic dream team for the general election. For starters, Obama said, he has won twice as many states as Clinton, secured the most delegates, and captured a larger share of the overall popular vote to date.”

The Washington Post: "The vice presidency came up repeatedly Monday at a news conference called by Obama's campaign to showcase former military leaders backing him. Clifford Alexander Jr., a former secretary of the Army, said that ‘people of all backgrounds -- white, black, Latino -- all see this is more surrealistic than any other sense.’ ‘There's something of an implied compliment, as well,’ said Richard Danzig, secretary of the Navy during the Clinton administration. ‘It's nice to think Senator Clinton thinks Senator Obama's clearly qualified to sit a heartbeat away from the presidency.’”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (22 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

The Magnolia match up

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:21 AM by Mark Murray

The Clarion Ledger: "[V]oter turnout is still expected to be light to moderate in an election that also includes two open congressional seats and a U.S. Senate contest. Between 125,000 to 150,000 voters will cast ballots, Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann predicted. He said 100,000 headed to the polls in the 2004 presidential primary that featured eight contenders for the Democratic nomination, including ultimate nominee Sen. John Kerry. Mississippi has 1.78 million registered voters."

More: "Mississippi does not require voters to declare party affiliation when they register to vote. Therefore, residents who usually vote Republican can cast a ballot today for Obama or Clinton. But those voters would have to forgo voting in the Republican congressional primaries."

The Boston Globe’s primer on the race: “Blacks are expected to constitute more than half of Democratic voters, and Barack Obama has swept states with large African-American electorates so far. Hillary Clinton was first lady of neighboring Arkansas for 16 years. Obama led by between 6 and 24 percentage points in polls last week. Both candidates have campaigned in the state, though Obama stumped there yesterday, while Clinton spent the day in Pennsylvania, site of the next big showdown on April 22.”

DiscussDiscuss (8 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Next contests: Kicking off PA

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:19 AM by Mark Murray

PENNSYLVANIA: Clinton kicked off the next big primary race yesterday in Scranton, PA, a town where she has deep roots, NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones reports. Clinton was greeted by a big, enthusiastic crowd and long lines and was accompanied by supporter Gov. Ed Rendell, Lt. Gov. Catherine Baker Knoll, and two local mayors.

The senator's great-grandparents settled in Scranton in the 1880s; her father and grandfather grew up in the town; and she spent time in this part of the state as a child. She delivered her usual speech, heavy on warm memories of time she spent here and ended by asking the mostly white audience of more than 2,500 for their help. Several hundred waited in overflow to greet the senator after the main event.
   
"I want to turn out every voter.... I hope young people particularly will get involved, because I think that northeastern Pennsylvania is the key to my winning the Keystone State. That's what I think," she told the crowd packed into the gym at Scranton High School. "I don't think it's giving anything away to tell you that the governor and I will be back here on Saturday for the St. Patrick's Day parade."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (15 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Clinton: Ferraro's tough words

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:18 AM by Mark Murray

Clinton supporter/ex-VP nominee Geraldine Ferraro had some tough things to say about Obama in an interview with the Torrance Daily Breeze. "When the subject turned to Obama, Clinton's rival for the Democratic Party nomination, Ferraro's comments took on a decidedly bitter edge. ‘I think what America feels about a woman becoming president takes a very secondary place to Obama's campaign - to a kind of campaign that it would be hard for anyone to run against,’ she said. ‘For one thing, you have the press, which has been uniquely hard on her. It's been a very sexist media. Some just don't like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign.’”

“‘If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,’ she continued. ‘And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.’ Ferraro does not buy the notion of Obama as the great reconciler.”

“‘I was reading an article that said young Republicans are out there campaigning for Obama because they believe he's going to be able to put an end to partisanship,’ Ferraro said, clearly annoyed. ‘Dear God! Anyone that has worked in the Congress knows that for over 200 years this country has had partisanship - that's the way our country is.’”

Politico asked Howard Wolfson for reaction to Ferraro's skin color remark. “‘We disagree with her,’ said spokesman Howard Wolfson.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (48 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

McCain: Those lobbyist ties...

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:16 AM by Mark Murray

Here come the McCain campaign lobbyist stories… The AP: “Top current advisers to Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign last year lobbied for a European plane maker that beat Boeing to a $35 billion Air Force tanker contract, taking sides in a bidding fight that McCain has tried to referee for more than five years. Two of the advisers gave up their lobbying work when they joined McCain's campaign. A third, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, lobbied for the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. while serving as McCain's national finance chairman.”

The Washington Post tracks down a native Cuban, who interviewed McCain while he was a POW. "The Granma clipping in Barral's restaurant, dated Jan. 24, 1970, recalls one of the defining periods of McCain's life, his 5 1/2 years as a prisoner of war after his Navy jet was shot down over North Vietnam. The tale of that photo and how an obscure Cuban psychologist came to interview McCain -- now a 71-year-old U.S. senator from Arizona and the presumptive Republican presidential nominee -- rouses the echoes, curiosities and suspicions of another era."

The first round of health articles hit today, with McCain promising a full release of his medical records in the next two months.

A big fundraising week for McCain… "Six days after clinching the Republican nomination, McCain headed Monday to a fundraiser in St. Louis. He planned to continue today in New York, Wednesday in Boston, Thursday in Pennsylvania and Friday in Chicago to counter an explosion in giving to the Democratic contenders who each set personal bests in February."

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (8 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama: Rezko trial watch

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:15 AM by Mark Murray

The Chicago Sun-Times says that “Obama's name again surfaced in the [Rezko] trial as Obama was mentioned in a memo about legislation that downsized the planning board in 2003. Rezko's lawyers sought to show that others besides Rezko were recommending candidates for the planning board, but the memo's reference to Obama focused solely on Obama's role in crafting the legislation.”

The New York Times: “Mr. Obama has not been accused of any wrongdoing, and his name is expected to come up only tangentially during the trial. But given his tight race against Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination, each mention of Mr. Obama’s name is being closely watched.”

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) “on Monday defended his prediction that terrorists would celebrate if Democrat Barack Obama were elected president, despite a rebuke from aides to John McCain, the GOP's apparent presidential nominee. ‘(Obama will) certainly be viewed as a savior for them,’ Rep. Steve King told The Associated Press. ‘That's why you will see them supporting him, encouraging him.’”

DiscussDiscuss (20 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Down the ballot

Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:14 AM by Mark Murray

Al Franken is now the de facto Minnesota Senate nominee because his chief primary rival, Mike Ciresi, dropped out. Get ready for the highest profile Senate match-up of 2008: Franken v. Norm Coleman.

The AP: Franken has raised millions more in campaign funds and lined up most of the important union endorsements, but Ciresi's impressive resume as a trial attorney and personal wealth positioned him as a potential spoiler to Franken's ambition.”

DiscussDiscuss (5 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

A NAFTA stretch?

Posted: Monday, March 10, 2008 10:42 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Aswini Anburajan
COLUMBUS, Miss. -- Attempting to re-write history on her positions on NAFTA is something that Barack Obama has accused Hillary Clinton of doing in recent weeks. But in Mississippi Monday, Obama found himself re-weaving the tale of his own recent past in connection with the unpopular trade deal.

After telling the crowd that Clinton was confronted by Tim Russert with making numerous statements in support of NAFTA at a recent MSNBC debate, Obama then attempted to pass off the meeting between a senior economic advisor, Austan Gooslbee, and members of the Canadian Embassy as nothing more than a goodwill mission that underscored Obama's commitment to renegotiating NAFTA.

"We've got one of my economic advisors, he goes and visits a Canadian Embassy and they're asking him questions and he says, 'Well Senator Obama isn't planning to repeal NAFTA, but he wants to amend it to make it stronger for U.S. workers.'"

Obama went on to say that Canadian Embassy put an inaccurate spin on the meeting and the Clintons took advantage of it.

"The Canadian Embassy writes it up as, 'Well, maybe Obama is not as tough on NAFTA as you might think,' and the Clintons start waving this and saying, 'See. Actually he's the one.’" Well no, this was not my policy. This was theirs," Obama said of the Clintons.

That's not quite how the story goes. Goolsbee, a professor at the University of Chicago in addition to being an adviser, didn't exactly go and visit a Canadian Embassy like he was on a tour of his own. He was invited by Canadian diplomats to the consulate in Chicago Feb. 8 to discuss trade with Canadian diplomats.

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (104 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

What about that 'Dream Ticket'?

Posted: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:39 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
OLD FORGE, Pa. -- Clinton spoke to the press about reports linking New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer to a prostitution ring after she was mobbed by fans here at Revello's Pizzeria in northeast Pennsylvania, where she has deep roots.

After greeting supporters outside the pizza parlor and spending several minutes talking and posing for pictures with people inside, Clinton responded to questions about Spitzer.

"I don't have any comment on that," she said, "but I obviously am sending, you know, my best wishes and thoughts to the governor and to his family."

When asked whether she thought the beleaguered governor could survive this latest scandal, the senator said, "Let's wait and see what comes out over the next days, but right now I don't have any comment, and I think it's appropriate just to wish his family well, and we'll wait and see how things develop."

The issue of a "Dream Ticket"  with both Clinton and Obama was raised, an idea she and her husband have both hinted at in recent days, with a reporter asking how she could reconcile suggesting the Illinois senator had not passed the Commander-In-Chief test while suggesting he could make a good vice president, Clinton dodged the question, saying it was too soon to discuss running mates.

"Well, you know, this thing has really been given a life of its own," she said. "You know, a lot of Democrats like us both and have been, you know, very hopeful that they wouldn't have to make a choice, but obviously Democrats have to make a choice, and I'm looking forward to getting the nomination, and it's premature to talk about whoever might be on whose ticket, but I believe I am ready to serve on Day One."

DiscussDiscuss (99 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama surrogates defend candidate

Posted: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:43 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Victoria Riess and Lauren Gall
Seeking to further combat the Clinton campaign’s insinuations that Obama would not be suited to serve as Commander-In-Chief, the candidate was praised by three of his military advisors in a press conference in DC.

The advisers, took of whom served under Bill Clinton, lauded Obama’s judgment and leadership qualities, touted his ability to unify the country.
 
Clifford Alexander, Secretary of the Army in the Carter administration reflected on Obama's qualifications. "I've known Barack since the mid-90s,” he said, “I've seen him in lots of positions, and I compare his leadership skills, most favorably, with the civilian and military leaders that I've seen throughout my professional life."
 
Secretary of the Navy under the Clinton administration, Richard Danzig, described Obama's ability to lead as obvious. "I think people recognize, anybody who deals with Sen. Barack Obama, what an extraordinary Commander-In-Chief he would be," Danzig said. "And I think it's difficult for others to effectively deny that. … The reality is, as Secretary Alexander said right at the outset, and Secretary Peters seconded it, it's character, and it's judgment."
 
Susan Rice, foreign policy adviser to Obama, re-iterated that “none of the three remaining candidates in the field have been in an executive position whereby they've had to respond to that proverbial 3 am crisis, and for Sen. Clinton and others to suggest that somehow their experience as first lady or some other set of experience uniquely qualifies them for that phone call is a dubious proposition.”
 
Alexander said with regard to Clinton’s tendency to name military officials in her list of supporters, "I do think that it is important not to count the countries you've gone into, and not to count the number of people that you know, but to understand fully that you are going to be a better leader if you have consistency, good judgment, thoughtfulness, and an ability to execute. Sen. Obama during this campaign has exhibited those traits."

DiscussDiscuss (59 Comments) Email thisEmail this | Link to thisLink to this

Obama responds to Clinton charges

Posted: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:12 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan and NBC’s Ben Weltman and Domenico Montanaro
COLUMBUS, Miss. -- In a fiery speech, Obama pushed back hard against charges by Hillary Clinton and her campaign that he is not suited to be Commander-In-Chief, and expressed disbelief at the Clintons’ suggestions that he be vice president.

“Now first of all, with all due respect, with all due respect,” Obama began, “I have won twice as many states as Sen. Clinton. I have won more of the popular vote than Senator Clinton. I have more delegates than Senator Clinton. So I don't know how somebody who is in second place, is offering the vice presidency to the person who is in first place.

“I mean, I am just wondering, because if I was in second place I could understand it. But I am in first place right now. So that's point number one.”

He went on to point out how Clinton could consider him as his VP when she and the campaign have been saying that he is not ready to be Commander-In-Chief.

“But there's a second point,” he said. “This is an interesting point. I want you guys to follow me on this. President Bill Clinton, back in 1992 when he was being asked about his selection for Vice President, he said that the only criteria, the most important criteria for a Vice President, is that that person is ready, if I fell out, in the first week, that he or she will be ready to be the Commander-In-Chief.

“That was his criteria. Now they have been spending the last two, three weeks, you remember with that advertisement with the phone call, getting all the Generals to say, ‘Well, he is not ready. I am ready on Day One; he may not be ready yet.’ But I don't understand, if I am not ready, how is it that you think I should be such a great Vice President.”

CONTINUED >>

DiscussDiscuss (85 Comments) Email thisEmail this |