ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Clinton doubts Obama on natl security

Posted: Saturday, March 01, 2008 2:18 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
IN THE SKY OVER TEXAS, MARCH 1 -- Clinton feels good about her prospects in Texas despite the state's intricate process for awarding delegates based on both primary and caucus results.

"We feel really good about it. We are training people," she told reporters on her campaign plane Saturday afternoon. "We are recruiting precinct captains. We feel good about it."

"I feel good about our campaigns and about what people are focusing on now. The kind of questions that are being asked, but obviously people have to be given a chance to vote and that hasn't happened yet.”

The New York senator said she had been focusing on Texas since last spring as part of a strategy of winning the big states. This was an interesting comment because a few weeks ago, she told reporters that grown men were crying over trying to figure out the Texas process. When reminded about those comments, she said they had known about the process, but that the primary is what most people paid attention to. (Note: In a Feb. 18 press conference on the plane before taking off from Madison, Wis., Clinton was asked to explain to the press how Texas' delegate allocation worked. Her response: "I have no idea. I mean, I've got people trying to understand it as we speak...Grown men are crying over trying to understand it," she joked. "I had no idea how bizarre it was until, you know, we had to start figuring it out.")

Polls show the race is tight in Texas and Ohio. Clinton would not comment on the "buyer's remorse" argument her camp put forward in a conference call Friday. Top aides said any loss by Obama on Tuesday would be a sign of voter dissatisfaction with the candidate, despite his having won 11 contests in a row.

She declined to answer whether she needs victories in both Ohio and Texas, despite the fact that her husband and others have said she has to win both to stay in the race

Clinton said she would continue to stress national security Obama, calling it a "defining issue" in the election with McCain as the Republican nominee and issuing a challenge a day after a fierce back and forth over a Clinton ad called "Children" that Obama's camp called an attempt to appeal to people's fears.

"If Sen. Obama is unwilling to engage me over national security, how is he going to engage Sen. McCain?" she said, before going on to highlight the support she'd gotten from members of the military.  

Clinton's ad asks people to ask themselves who they would want answering the phone at 3 am in the White House in the event of a crisis, implying her Democratic rival wasn't up to the task. She was asked when she had had that "red phone" experience.

"I was involved in a lot of the decisions that were made,” Clinton said, “but again you're looking at it from the wrong perspective. No one who hasn't been president has ever done that, so that's not the question.

“The question is what have you done over the course of a lifetime to equip you for that moment, and I think you'll be able to imagine many things Sen. McCain will be able to say. He's never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience. Sen. Obama will put forth a speech he made in 2002.”

When asked why she should be trusted to run the White House after suffering a series of problems during her campaign, like running out of money and replacing top staffers, Clinton said McCain had faced challenges too, that campaigns were organic and evolving and that she was very proud of her campaign.

In response to reports the Obama camp played down his criticism of NAFTA with Canadian officals, she called it "disturbing that he would say one thing in Ohio and then have his camp send a private signal to a foreign government, which is representing exactly the opposite of what he's been saying in Ohio" and called it part of a pattern that deserved closer examination.

The senator reiterated her willingness to opt out of NAFTA if Canada and Mexico won't renegotiate. It's a position that has caused some alarm among economists and some Democrats who argue the opt out threat is bad for America's reputation in the world and say the trade agreement has been good for the American economy.

*** UPDATE *** The Clinton campaign is sending this video around. Question: Might the RNC use this if Obama becomes the nominee?

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I'll take Obama's speech over your "experience" anyday.  :-)
The only thing barack hussein obama can clealry guarantee the American Public is double talk and back tracking and double standards. BTW, he always says he was against the war from the start; however, where exactly was he when the final Iraq resolution vote was taken since he clealry was not a memeber of the U.S. Senate?  He has clearly abused all Americans by saying he voted against it. Furthermore, he has been totally reckless regarding Afghanistan. This guy is not qualified to president of anything in this country.
Any ties to a church for 20 years that has a preacher admiring Farakhan as "greatness" has swayed my views in favor of Clinton.

I don't think that obama hates whites as little white devils as Farakhan does, but it does allow me to believe he would not have Isreals (Jews) best interests in mind in a volatile region where we definately need an ally.

I tend to think of my ministers remarks as sacred. And for 20 years a memeber? Something has had to have worn off on him. Is there an underlying thought as his wife, Michelle obama had on American pride?

I'm disheartend with the Democratic party supporting him and if they don't switch to Clinton then I will fvor McCain myself.

Say no to hatred.

Vote Clinton '08


she is leading in hte latest polls against McCai anyway for the general.
If we have problems in this campaign, I suspect it's not going to be because of mistakes I've made in the past. I think it's going to be the mistakes that I make in the future," Obama said on 60 Minutes.

------------------------------------------------------
We can not afford OBAMA and his mistakes.  We have had years of BUSH mistakes.
The time for mistakes is past, the world is hanging on a precarious thread.
A  MISTAKE BY OBAMA CAN MEAN YOUR DEATH!
He is so inexperienced he thinks Canada has a president.
I guess he is thinking of running for office there too. He is truly delusional.
His power hungry supporter are now threatening super delegates with dire consequences if they do not support OBAMA.  We will soon have the power of the criminal strong arms running our country.
Do not vote for such scum, NO OBAMA!

Invitation to all obama supporters.

We at  www.hillaryclinton.com  strive also for change.

Men have had their chance at running this country.

Come join us for REAL change.  We welcome you with open arms.


"I was involved in a lot of the decisions that were made,” Clinton said, “but again you're looking at it from the wrong perspective. No one who hasn't been president has ever done that, so that's not the question...."

Oh yes Hillary, that IS and WAS the question. You bark about your 35 years of experience as if it was all WHITE HOUSE experience and CRITICAL RED PHONE experience but you blew it when you had your red phone chance.... you supported an unjust war then turned around and gave Bush the green light to attack IRAN.....

No more red phones for you Hillary. The press had it right and no matter how much you try twisting the truth after the water drains and the spin cycle stops all you have left was your bad judgement. Go make some cookies...



Every slam she makes against Obama she subsequently shows applies to her.  We've seen multiple examples of why she's "all rhetoric and no reality" but this is the latest.

Senator Clinton:  "I'm ready to lead on Day 1."

The Reality:  (1) She had no plan for what to do after February 5 (witness the 0 for 11 record), (2) she had to lend money to her campaign after badly mismanaging the first 6 months, (3) she had no idea how Texas works and is only recruiting precinct captains.

She's ready to smear on Day 1 but certainly not ready to lead.
hahaha... I just had a funny... Hillary thinks she's the smartest person in the room and she can outwit the media and Americans with her fuzzy answers that leads to nowhere... hahahha....

I wonder if she knows Bill endorsed Obama....
I don't care how much or how littel Obama beats her in TX AND OH on Tuesday. I would just like the primary season come to some resolution, as I am getting really weary of Hillary's constant baloney. (TX always part of her strategy? Yeah, right. She also said it would be over Feb 5.)
Bill finally got it partially right today when he stated that Senator Clinton has only held elected office since 2000, thus throwing a grenade into her specious claims of "35 years of experience."

However, quick question for Bill Clinton about his wife's "career of being a public servant."

Since when does being a corporate lawyer at the Rose Law Firm and a member of the Board of Directors at WalMart equate to a career of being a public servant.
With all the turmoil during the second Clinton Term in the White house......can we assume that Mr. and Mrs Clinton weren't exactly on speaking terms and Mrs Clinton probably would not have heard the Presidents phone ringing?  Come on folks wake up.....remember those days in Washington....do we want them to return.  The answer is no.  Lets move on and let the Clintons try to fix their history problem without putting the nation through any more unproductive devisive politics.
Not only should she be reminded of the "grown men crying" remark, there is the "it will be over by Feb. 5," remark. The "It will be me," remark. The "inevitable" quasi-incumbent campaign. The Lack of money after Feb. 5th. And so much more...

The so-called "big state" strategy is only a hair's breadth different from the Giuliani "camp out in Florida," strategy. Every time you take a breath, the Clinton strategy is changing.

I hope that MSNBC has the cajones to vigorously question Mrs. Clinton on the incredulity of her and her campaign's comments. To suggest that the person with the momentum and the eleven straight wins is subject ot buyer's remorse is absolutely foolish. It is high time someone told the Emperess she has no clothes, shoes, hats, jewels, coats, scarves, underwear, NOTHING!!!!
Hey folks.  Think about all of Hillary's so called experience on national security.  No, really think about it.  Ask yourself of specific instances.  There just aren't any other than she lived with Bill. That's experience?

Experience seems to be Clinton's Ace card she keeps trying to play, i.e. you've got to know what to do after receiving a trouble call at 3 o'clock in the morning and all the rest.

Consider this: Any leader does not stand alone. They surround themselves with an intelligent, capable and highly experienced staff.  In the case of the presidency, there will be a cadre of advisors and a cabinet at minimum.  No President is going to be making decisions based solely on their own knowledge, AND THAT INCLUDES HILLARY or any other person holding that office.  She, as any other President would, is going to evaluate all advice and recommendations from all these people around them (including members of the Congress as well) and then decide.  This is one of Obama's greatest strengths. He has the sage judgement and competencies to make the best decision to achieve the greatest benefit and outcome for the future.  This, together with advice from all who surround him,  will result in the most competent national security stance.  But he has something more, he has a vision for changing Washington for the better (bringing people together) and for offering people hope for changing the future for the people by divesting power and placing it in them, and not just in Washington.  I think this is over many people's heads and certainly is beyond the Clintons.
   
HP and everyone else on Clinton's staff who's trying to push the "black superdelegates are being pressured, etc, etc,"

The article that tried to make that point quoted two individuals who have been ardent supporters of Senator Clinton.  It quoted NOBODY else.  This was a purposeful storyline advanced by the Clinton team in order to paint Barack black again so that they could solidify the hispanic vote in Texas.

Shame on them.
Since she doesn't have much else to back up her "experience" or "judgment" claims, perhaps Senator Clinton could point to the strategic similarities she shares with a US President.  I think Newsweek gets credit for pointing out that Senator Clinton's strategy after Feb 5 was stunningly similar to President Bush's after the invasion of Iraq:  nonexistent.

Yeh, me too.  I feel good.  Really good.  Feelin'good.  Grooovy.  Yeh.  Feelin' groovy.

Lost 20 some points each in 4 states in 2 weeks.  Feelin' good now.

Now we  got him on the run!!!

  It is apparent to me at this time that Hillary Clinton is up against the most brillantly run campaign this country has seen in some time. His ability to respond to her new ad that quick is unbelievable.
  It is true that she underestimated him early, and then he bushwacked her on Super Tuesday in all those small cacus states. He then rides an 11 state win streak based on anti- hillary fevor(both press & public) to an acknowleged yet misleading lead. I agree Clinton won't catch him  before convention in pledged delegates
  However, Hillary Clinton is better than the campaign she has run. She could still win, though it won't be pretty. In fact it will be ugly (scorched earth).
  Her real problem is even if Super delegates give her nomination they will force Barrack Obama on her as V.P. That is why in last 2 debates when asked by moderator if Barrack is qualified to serve she won't say no.She is in a box.
  While I feel Clinton is probably better candidate I do know for sure Obama is the better politician and campaigner.
 
 
NAFTA is a joke as far as truckers are concerned. Mexico and Canada truckers can come here and haul point to point no problem. We on the other hand can not. We are not even allowed in Mexico unless we go thru all kinds of hoops and expense. We can go into Canada and deliver but the only thing we can load is right back to the states or deadhead out. thats really fair? Also the US is the only country that I know of that you have to pay a fee to get back into. NAFTA is a one sided agreement that dosent benifent the average american worker.


She's just now recruiting precinct captains? If so, she's in trouble.

Also, I don't think Clinton can make a compelling argument with respect to national security. She didn't seem to understand U.S. policy toward Taiwan nor with respect to use of nuclear weapons against non-governmental organizations.

And now she is calling for a renewed effort in Afghanistan, seven months after Obama called for the same, and several months after the Bush Administration signaled an interest in executing the same.

Her public career has been oriented towards children and health issues. If she wants to claim expertise here, at least she can make a credible argument. On foreign affairs and security issues, she can't.
Hillary concerned about Obama on national security??  One only needs to compare how Clinton has ran her campaign vs Obama's to realize which has the better judgement and organizational skills, Hillary's campaign has been in utter chaos since the begining with constant staff shake ups, resignations and firings of top advisors, ect.. If Hillary cannot even organize and run a campaign successfully she is not the one I would want in command during a national crisis,
That Obama is more teflon than the Bush bunch----Will he survive Rezko on Monday?A pig in a poke?Family member and his and her groups not happy with Obama----less so with the idiots that sent them there.
I like Obama but his hesitance and mistakes on the campaign trail remind me of Bush on 9/11. remember that panicked look? Americans voted for Bush because they felt he was the kind of guys they'd want to have a beer with: look what it brought us. Every debate Clinton dazzles with her knowledge. Al Qaeda will come after us with a vengeance because of Iraq. The only one who understands both diplomacy and military responses if Clinton. I'll vote for my safety before I vote for the cool guy.
OK people!

Let's get crystal clear about Hillary's being there for "the 3 a.m. call."

Do you REALLY think Hillary was actually sleeping in the same bedroom as her husband for eight full years when such calls came in?  

I would say that she missed the critical first moments of the "3 a.m. calls."  

If Hillary was in the same room it was only because he buzzed her to join him in his bedroom minutes later.  

Get in your Time Machine.   It's now 1995.

Yes, It's morning in America, but only because HRC's alarm clock says "3:15 a.m." when Bill wakes her up.

Get Real!
Obama calls what he is now doing about the ad and his lack of national security gravitas "whining"

President McCain is spelled O-B-A-M-A
She's become out of touch with reality.

According to her, only the big states count, not the rest of the country.  I don't know about you, but those of us who live in Wisconsin take offense to that statement.

She's been preparing for the Texas Primary for a year and had no idea as to the prima-caucus?  Texans; she apparently is saying that those of you in the caucus are insignificant.  How does that make you feel? Hillary, you are losing it and losing the race.  

Vote Obama!
She thinks the best way to defend America is to invade Iraq and threaten Iran, even though intelligence reports show Iraq was not developing nuclear weapons and that Iran apparently halted nuclear weapons research and development many years ago.
Instead of demanding that Bush stop the war and focus on al quaida, she allowed herself to be a 'Republican' for the duration of Republican control of both chambers of Congress by voting on the war and other hawkish foreign policies. That is why she calls McCain "a friend".
Hillary knows no diplomatic consensus and prefers confrontational, war monging approach to dealing with our foes. But if we employ such an approach, our foes become increasingly reclusive. That is why Bush failed to accomplish many of his foreign policies.
For me, Hillary is simply Bush's successor who will inherit his hawkish foreign policies, since she calls herself a 'fighter' rather than a consensus seeker.
The best approach to national security is to focus on strengthening our borders and domestic defenses, including anti-nuclear weapons research, before we confront evil regimes.
Senator Clinton: You may have doubts but we've learned not to trust your judgment.

Here's what we look to instead.  In the past week, the Chairman of the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee and the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee BOTH endorsed Obama.  They have BOTH known you for the entire 35 years of your experience and yet they endorsed him.  I know some of your hacks will write in with slander against "the two white men who don't know anything," but intelligent voters will see that the two MOST EXPERIENCED individuals in the Senate on the issues of foreign relations and intelligence have implicitly denounced Senator Clinton.
"iIwill sit down and meet with our enemies" - owekay, you think? They don't want to meet with you  - for example Al Queida wants your head on a platter.

Wake up america! He isn't a leader in the world domain neither would he be in our borders. He is an empty shell of inspiration. The shine is gone and the substance is showing.

The tide is turning in Clintons favor!

Clinton '08
Good judgement is something that equips you and defines you over a lifetime.  Hillary completely missed the point of Obama's response in the decision to go to war in Iraq and stary there.  I for one would want the person answering the red phone at 3a.m. to be a person of sound mind and excellent judgement!
With 10 years of hate from the republicans and this assault from the media towards senator Clinton: Isn't it amazing that the woman is still a viable candidate? All these sources and years of trying to sink her: to me it indicates the kind of strength and preseverance I want in a president.
you go Hillary!!!
One of our nation’s top military figures, General Shelton served two terms as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush.  

In announcing his endorsement, General Shelton said, “I’ve been with Senator Clinton when she has been with our military men and women.  I know from those experiences that she understands the demands and sacrifice of military life. I am confident she will always put the readiness and well being of our troops first.  She is ready to be Commander-in-
Chief                                                  
www.hillaryclinton.com     CHECK IT OUT
We should doubt him: he thinks he can go and make nice with dictators like Castro. On top of that he is anti military and keeps yapping about peace. Who needs a hippie friend of Farrahkan in the white house?
Oh, my. More of the same at this late date.  I guess the kitchen sink missed its target.  

I will say one thing, though:  The Clinton campaign really has its bloggers up and running on all of the political sites.  I hope the campaign isn't providing the script, however, because their bloggers really have some sewrious deficiencies when it comes to spelling and grammar! Not the very best advertisement, is it?!
Hillary should listen to her husband:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGW38Zy4bJo
The Clinton campaign just keeps moving those goal posts.  She must really have learned from GWBush.  Keep changing the expectations.  Is this the leader you want?
Personally, I doubt Hillary on National Security.  
Who would answer the phone at 3 AM, Bill or Hillery?  No thanks, we need a clean break for change.
I'll start listening to any news from the Clinton camp as soon as she turns over her taxes. I know she's busy, but one call to the IRS, and they would fax her a copy so she doesn't have to "find" hers.
The most damaging story I've read about her came out yesterday.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/29/718538.aspx
If Obama played Hillary's mud-slinging games, this story would not have been buried.
I read it - Shame on you Hillary, for selling out every woman in America!

I believe the tide is turning in Hillary's favor and I find a little movement on the media's part on her behalf (although it is small--they give Obama the lead on all stories, rallies, etc.)  Hillary is experienced, willing to roll up her sleeves (not just talk about it) and do the work.  She is capable.  Obama is getting the bulk of the media coverage and that is so unfair.  Maybe soon the media will have buyer's remorse and see what they have created.  We can only hope and pray.  
In Ohio Obama talks about NAFTA like it's the devil, in Canada he changes his tune. He singns a contract about campaign financing and now he flip flops about that. He feels sorry for palestininans who kill jews every chance they get, then goes and pleads with jews for their vote. He is an empty suit who will say anything to get in the white house and no one in the media will report it because they want to be part of a "movement". Sure, a "movement" for style over of substance. Wake up people you are being hoodwinked (to quote Malcolm X as Obama does daily)
****************************************************
HILLARY IS WORKING AT "STEALING" THE NOMINATION !
****************************************************
Why don't you all report the change in the polls the last 2 days that show Clinton is gaining ground? Hmmm......bias at NBC? Nooooooo! They don't have time for biased reporting they are too busy working Obama talking points into the script.
Why have all these roadblocks been put up against the Clinton Campaign???

Delegates should be awarded by popular vote not by district"s (non Hispanic and non white. Why should some votes count more than others? Sounds undemocratic to me.

Please vote for Hilliary - A True Democrat.
The heart of any presidential candidate should be based their tactics on fear or attacks. This is so Americans-backwards. What we need in the future is someone who is able to bring us together as a nation, and heal the scars since Bush's 7 years of plummeting US moralities around the world.

It's time to give Americans first, not second, third or last. It's time to vote a president into office who will work for the people, by the people and of the people--not lobbying on special interests' behalf. And all of these come to a president who has the judgment to be right on Day One, not authorize a cold-call to destroy the US reputation in a war that had caused us millions in seconds.




Hillary Clinton needs to look in the mirror if she is concerned about someone who may not be qualified on issues of national security.  Perhaps she should read John Dickerson's (Slate) account of a conference call held with her chief strategist recently where no one could answer the following question, "What one thing on Senator Clinton's resume could you point to which demonstrates how she has responded to an international crisis?"

There is no answer.  Hillary has no prior experience in dealing with an international crisis, except for her Iraq war vote which she got wrong.  She claims to be personally acquainted with the leaders of many countries, however, the leaders that she knew are no longer the Heads of State.

I'm not buying what she is selling.  She is ridiculous.
How shameful it is that Obama would say one thing to the people of Ohio regarding NAFTA and then send a backchannel message to the Canadians contradicting that message.  I hope that voters in Ohio and Texas will choose Senator Clinton's experience and trustworthiness over Obama's inexperience and sneakiness.
YEAH YOU GO GIRL - HILLARY ALL THE WAY!
Show the MEN and the WHOLE world that us women can declare war!  We won't do it just because a leader said bad things about our father or for oil either!  We can be just as tough as men!  We have at least 2 allies in the world so we got all the friends we need!  Who cares about the rest of the world as long as a WOMAN is president!
Interesting that a reporter would ask HRC about the NAFTA story that has been debunked by both the Canadien Govt. and the Obama campaign as of two days ago now, yet, HRC comments as if the allegations are true and attributable to Obama himself.  The same playing "fast and loose" with the truth she's displayed throughout the campaign as exampled by the Reagan and Pakistan "bombing" comments.
I am voting McCain, but why is there so much pro Obama press. This is undermining the electoral process. Your job is to report not decide. We are getting  sick of the Obama love 24/7. Shame on you, where are real journalists like Cronkite and Murrow? Go work for the tabloids.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=720442

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google