ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Hillary the decider?

Posted: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:56 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
WESTERVILLE, OH -- Clinton, who is stumping across Ohio two days before a must-win primary here, continued to drive home her argument that she is better prepared than her rival to deal with crises as president.

"When the cameras are gone and the lights are out, the president of the United States, as I know very well, is in that White House," she today told a group of supporters gathered in a high school gym here. "And, yes, there are advisers. There's all kinds of people who are saying do this and do that. But the president has to decide."

She continued, "When those calls come at 3:00 am, it might be a national security crisis. You know, it could be an economic crisis. You know, the economy's facing some really troubled waters. Think about what could happen if there were unrest in Nigeria, a terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia, oil would shoot to $150 a barrel."

Clinton needs to win in Ohio to stay in the race, according to many political observers, and she spoke today about the importance of the state, a place where the economy is tops on voters' minds.

"Ohio is once again the center of attention for a reason, because Ohio, as Ted Strickland says everywhere I travel with him, truly does represent America -- the kind of hopes and aspirations, the kind of challenges and opportunities, they're all right here in Ohio," she said. "I can go from one end of this state to another, and I can see the growth and the new jobs in a place like Columbus and then I can see the shuttered steel mills in Youngstown. I can be visiting with laid off workers in Toledo, who are just so worried about what's going to happen next and then I can be down in Cincinnati with financial services and others who are doing the jobs that they hope to attract and keep. It is a picture of America."

The event launched what the campaign is calling a "Solutions for America" caravan of canvassers who aim to knock on hundreds of thousands of doors. It kicked off what it's calling an 88 counties in 88 hours tour on Friday in Ohio to reach out to voters and supporters in every county.

State Director Robby Mook called this a "hotly contested race" and said he wasn't paying much attention to polls, focusing instead on getting out the vote. Mook said absentee and early voting rates had been high, but expressed some concern that bad weather could disproportionately affect the southeastern part of the state, where Clinton has a lot of support.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I was for Hillary from day 1 for the very reasons she has come to center on. Her experience, her knowledge of the world and of the USA is far and above that of Barack. Can Barack lead? Yes. But, that is not the question at this point in time. I just don't see anything in him that tells me he matches her wisdom, her capacity to be tough, her knowledge of a very wide range of issues, and her experience. I also see another George McGovern run comming down the road. Hillary is not as far left as Barack. That has become one issue more evident as time has past. He is just too far left to be my first choice. If he wins, I'll vote for the guy. Can't imagine another Republican running us further and further into the last century.
Her experience???  
(1) Voting for the war without looking closely to available intelligence or even watching TV for fresh news from the Middle East.
(2) Praising NAFTA which revealed to the most catastrophic agreement in recent history.
(3) Multiple connections with lobbyists.
(4) Implication in multiple financils scandals.
(4) Working against worker unions for the benefit of Wall Mart.
CCL: one has to be completely uninformed to overlook Clinton's misleading claims about experience.  Fortunatley, the majority of voters are not so naive.  
John Doe, Joseph Goebbels would have been proud of you.  Your unrelenting posting of propaganda you know to be false after repeated corrections by others proves that. You know that if you tell it often enough that some people will come to believe it. Your hatred seems to be only exceeded by your fear.  I don't know how you can sleep at night for fear of the bogeyman under your bed.
whats a guy to do?    i dont want an inexperienced guy as president [exit obama ] i dont want another clinton as president [ exit hillary ] and i dont want a grumpy old man as president [ exit mccain ] so, whats a guy to do?
So, wait a minute...is Clinton running as a Republican or a Democrat? She seems to be stealing all of Bush's best lines.  Or should I say Karl Rove's.

Really, Hill.  Shame on you.
The Clintons blew it on 2 late night call, and dozens of Americans died, right here in the US, due to their mismanagement. Do a websearch on Waco, Tx and David Koresh. 74 died, mostly innocent women and children, with the Clintons giving the commands. I voted for them in 92, I am deeply sorry I did.
Insanity, this woman must take us for fools. What makes her more qualified to be President or answer the phone at 3AM?

Vanity is vanity
Tired of the Media,Scottsbluff,Ne.: "Now you see the the photo in Iraq and how it looks. Do you still think having these type of photos with an American President should be spread across the world?"


Here's a little nugget of geographical wisdom for you, sir:  Kenya is not in Iraq.
I apologize if I keep repeating myself, but:

I know one will read this whose mind I can change, but my husband says GO! DO it, do whatever you can.  My husband is from Scotland.  He has a science Ph.D.  Men and women both think that he is a really smart AND a cool guy (who adores smart women - he thinks smart women should rule the world).  He has always treated me as an equal, even though I only have a B.A.  His colleagues, men and women, treat me as if my opinion and knowledge is equally as great as theirs'.

As much as he believes in the high intelligence and capabilities of women, he thinks that if the Democrats don't vote for Obama NOW, we will never change the world and we will be stuck with the Republican craziness FOREVER!!!! (and I full heartedly agree).

I'm a knee jerk, liberal, woman over 50, for Obama (even though I loved the Clintons!) because I think we really, really need what Obama stands for NOW!  I really do want a woman president, but we need Obama now! at this point in time.  PLEEEZZZE!!!!!

This is from my heart!!!!   Let's give the Clintons their due after we have had a break from Bush/Clinton/Bush/?????   Really,! Bill, convince Hillary that it's going to be okay! she will have her historic moment a little bit later.

I might sound crazy, but I know I'm pretty sure I'm, not (everyone tells me that I'm smarter than I think I am (even my Republican friends) so I'm giving this a shot.  PLEAZE!!!, VOTE FOR OBAMA, give 'politics' a CHANCE AT CHANGE.
As much as l love the clintons, l think and l wish that is time for Senator clinton, to get out of the raca for the unity of the party if she loses either Tx or Ohio next tuesday and become a team player.Americans still love the Clintons,and will need some help from the clintons during the general election.That's the only way to beat sentor McCain and his Repulican machine.
We are in a SH*THOLE in Iraq thanks to the complicity of Clinton and McCain invading the wrong country!

You want HER to be "The Decider"???

She didn't read the NIE; she just based her decision on a "brief".

WTF?  Is that how she will wage war in the future?

Did she work "the nightshift" making that decision?  Nope.  She must have went to bed that night dreaming of being a War President someday.  She hedged her bet that the invasion would be quick and easy.

That's who you want as President?

We already have a bafoon as a President making snap decisions.
Last time the lights were out is when Sen. Clinton voted to support the Iraq war which was the wrong war at the wrong time in the wrong place for the wrong reasons even if Sadam had WMD like  almost everyone erroneously thought.  Many other Democrats are also at fault for not wanting to appear "weak on defense" in the face of the 2002 elections and going along with the Rove/Cheney/W hype.  Hillary is doubly at fault for what I believe was her mercenary interest in positioning herself to run for President as a "macho" supporter of military intervention.  It takes more courage to be right and avoid unnecessary wars.  It will take immense courage and brains and charisma and leadership to get us out of Iraq in the best way possible without further destabilizing the country and the region.  Hillary does not have it.  Obama maybe.  Let's vote our Hope and not our Fears.
"those who are in the know"???  Rockefeller is about as good as you can get on security. Then we have Lewis. Kennedy. Kennedy. Kerry. Who is "in the know"  movie stars? Ohhhh that's right jack nicholson? Now there is a guy for women rights and has done so much for our nation..right?
CARL ROVE is calling for Hillary not to quit, to go to the convention.  Yeah think the Reps. want Hillary to run for a reason?  They will EAT HER ALIVE with everything foing on now.
She will NOT RELEASE HER TAX FORMS.
She won't return money from a disbarred lawyer accused of the worst case of sexual harrassment by the EEOC!!!  what a woman for women...huh? She sold your souls for $170,000.00 women of America!!  
She doesn't talk for me, she doesn't represent me, She makes ALL women look WEAK, and I'm a female democrat from PA!
The Clinton's won't release the following:
1.  DONOR list for The Clinton library.
2. DONOR list for The Clinton foundation.
3. Papers from the white house years.
There is the Peter Paul thing, that isn't over!
Bill's international dealings with a country deamed by the U.S. government and SENATE (his wife included) as having terrible civil and human rights violations. He did this for his canadian buddy to make LOTS of money, and in return gave LOTS of money to ....guess who?  The CLINTON FOUNDATION!!!  Just a teeny cooincidence though.
There are so many dirty deals and secrets being kept by the Clintons, Hillary included!!! Her husband giving a "get out of jail free card" to terrorists for heavens sake!  Look it up...he did it!!
If Carl Rove, G.W., Cheney, limbaugh, oReilly, and McCain are against Obama...that's enough for me!  I want OBAMA....BECAUSE THEY WANT HILLARY!
Why would that be???
Wake up Democrats before it's too late, or WE will hand the Presidency to the war and FEAR mongors!  And remember...HIllary was with them until she decided to run for President!!!
Hillary Clinton is the same old TIRED DIRTY politics I'm soooo sick and tired of!!!!!!


It's time for us to moved to phase 2
Mending the party
 Mrs Clinton will you please step aside if you do not win Texas and Ohio by large margins.
For once listen to your husband and the your party, so we can start working on John Mccain.

I lost respect for your husband, after he gave George Bush the baton, instead of handing it intact to Al Gore .
I still have respect for you at this time.
Think of the American People that you care so much about.
Hold your head high and pass the baton.
It's 3 am......the phone in the White House is ringing......
It's BILL...... and he wants some PIZZA
Precisely, Roger Georgia
We TRUST HILLARY implicitly with our national security. We do not trust Obama because he's unknown, unqualfied and unelectable. Obama is too risky for the Dems to nominate.

Hillary Clinton is clearly the most intelligent, most qualified, most experienced, most capable, with the best grasp of domestic and international issues of any candidate in the race. She will be a GREAT President.

By the time the DNC convention rolls around in late August, the obamarama will have faded, it's already growing tired and silly. The Dems do not want to find themselves in an impossible situation of having to nominate an unelectable Obama, Hillary MUST stay in this race through the convention no matter what happens on Tuesday.

VOTE SMART!  VOTE HILLARY!
What I don't understand is how could she not have known that the war on Iraq was a big lie.  I, who did not have access to the NIE, figured it out on my own that it was a total construction by the Bush administration and a diversion from the real enemy because 1 - the longer the "War on Terror" the more popular he remains since it was obvious his administration was going to be a total debacle and 2 - c'mon people, didn't you think it would be Jeb that was going to try to continue on the legacy not W?  He had to prove he was better than little brother.  Bush bashing aside - Senator Obama knew that this was a "dumb war" just like so many of us out there.  Yeah, he may not have been in the Senate at the time.  But that Clinton campaign argument makes no sense.  I mean think about it.  She criticizes Obama for "only" giving a speech against the war (a small correct thing) but she made a decision to authorize the war (a big incorrect thing).  I mean, do they really believe in the saying - go big or go home?  Hmmm, kind of sounds like her approach to health care reform, too.  I say doing something that is "right" that may lead to incremental change is better than going for broke in the "wrong" direction.
Since when does sleeping at the White House qualify as experience?  With all the people who spent the night there when Bill was president, it's no wonder we don't have a hoard of pseudo experienced candidates.  Hillary's mantra of experience by osmosis is simply wishful thinking.  If anything, experience shows that Hillary has demonstrated remarkably consistent poor judgment.  
IRS eyes UCC over Obama's Hartford speech

The IRS said in the letter that it was concerned about articles posted on the church's Web site and on other sites stating that Obama had addressed nearly 10,000 people at the event. The agency also said Obama volunteers had staffed campaign tables "outside the center to promote his campaign." http://www.connpost.com/ci_8378716?source=rss
I would'nt trust Senator Clinton with our security or finances. She voted for the war in Iraq and with Bush on Iran. When I look at her campaign I know without a doubt she can't be trusted to run this country...not to mention her failure with health care in the past. She also has a trial comming up dealing with her INTEGRIY in her 2000 senate campaign.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=722414

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google