ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: It's close

Posted: Monday, March 03, 2008 9:13 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** It’s close in Ohio and Texas: The Clinton-Obama race has been exciting and fascinating, and according to two new polls released yesterday, it looks like excitement will continue into tomorrow’s pivotal contests. An MSNBC/McClatchy/Mason-Dixon survey has Obama up by one point in Texas, 46%-45%, and a Cleveland Plain Dealer/Mason-Dixon poll has Clinton leading by four points in Ohio, 47%-43%. Tuesday is going to be a fun night, folks… Nobody likes to be in a state that they think they might lose, so it is telling that Clinton is spending election night in Columbus, while Obama will be in San Antonio. Inside the polls, the subgroup breakdown is pretty predictable: Obama leads among men, those under 50, African Americans, and independents and Republicans; Clinton, meanwhile, leads among women, those over 50, whites, Hispanics, and Democrats.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on just how close the Democratic races in Ohio and Texas really are and what the outcomes could really mean.

*** Iraq returns to the trail? Also in those polls, the economy ranked as the most important issue in both Ohio and Texas -- followed by health care and then Iraq. But is that about to change? With its “3:00 am” ad, Clinton's camp successfully turned the final days of this campaign from NAFTA and domestic issues to national security. The question is whether this will turn out to be a good strategy. Sure, the Clinton folks are controlling the final hours of the message, but Obama's camp seems just as charged up about talking about Iraq.

*** Oh, Canada: In what feels like a Perry Mason moment, the Obama campaign is going to have a hard time somehow claiming their chief domestic policy adviser was meeting with the Canadians as a University of Chicago professor and not as an Obama emissary. The only thing the Obama campaign can be happy about is that this memo of the meeting leaked today and not three days ago when the Clinton campaign could have spent days harping on this. This really does hit the Obama campaign on credibility when it comes to the press corps and may hurt them on another story down the road. The press corps gave the Obama camp the benefit of the doubt on this story; it won't next time. Of course, we have another question: Why is the conservative Canadian government leaking this memo and getting involved in a Democratic primary race?

*** Reputation saving? In what almost reads like a campaign obit, the Los Angeles Times attempts to delve into just how the Clinton campaign found itself in this position. The most remarkable part of the story -- chief strategist's Mark Penn's attempt to basically make sure he has almost no allies left inside the campaign. "Penn said in an e-mail over the weekend that he had 'no direct authority in the campaign,' describing himself as merely 'an outside message advisor with no campaign staff reporting to me.'" More Penn: "I have had no say or involvement in four key areas -- the financial budget and resource allocation, political or organizational sides. Those were the responsibility of Patti Solis Doyle, Harold Ickes and Mike Henry, and they met separately on all matters relating to those areas." So in case it wasn't clear, Penn wants to make sure the world knows he had nothing to do with the campaign outside a few message ideas. This goes to some of the chief criticism of Penn we've heard is that he won't take a leadership role; he won't take responsibility. There are a lot of folks on the campaign that would want to "report" to him, but he did everything he could to shield himself from responsibility as this CYA response to the L.A. Times exemplifies. If Clinton wins Ohio and Texas tomorrow, just how much will Penn be trusted by the rest of the Clinton brain trust?

*** Richardson hearts Obama? Still sporting his post-election beard, Richardson stated on CBS yesterday that, "Whoever has the most delegates after Tuesday should be the nominee." Well, even if Clinton wins Ohio and Texas decisively tomorrow, Obama will have the most delegates after Tuesday. Is a Richardson endorsement of Obama coming soon? Say Wednesday…? If either candidate nets more than 10 delegates in tomorrow's contest, that would be considered a major upset. The most likely result is a five-delegate swing in one direction or the other.

*** “As far as I know”? Speaking of CBS, we imagine a qualifier Clinton gave on 60 Minutes last night is going to generate plenty of discussion today. In response to a bizarre question by Steve Kroft -- “You don’t believe that Sen. Obama is a Muslim,” following a discussion about that photo of Obama in Somali garb -- Clinton gave a bizarre answer: “Of course not. I mean, that, you know, there is no basis for that. I take him on the basis of what he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that.” Kroft followed: “You said you'd take Senator Obama at his word that he's not…a Muslim. You don't believe that he's…” Clinton interjected: “No. No, there is nothing to base that on. As far as I know.” As far as she knows? For a lawyer who has demanded precise language (example: the Farrakhan discussion at last week’s debate), Clinton’s dangling qualifier was a very odd statement. No doubt if she had that question to do over again, she would have said things clearer because this is how conspiracy theories start.

*** Body language: One thing about Clinton is that she seems re-fired up again -- for some reason, there does seem to be a lot more life left in the Clinton campaign than there seemed a week ago. “Things are breaking our way,” communications Howard Wolfson just said on Morning Joe. Is that wishful thinking? Or is there something here? Of course, is it right to say that contests -- in which Clinton led by some 20 points a while back, but are now essentially deadlocked -- are breaking the Clinton camp’s way? Or are they holding on for dear life? If anything, the one thing the Clinton campaign has succeeded at is moving the burden of expectations on Obama. A month ago, he trailed in three of the four March 4 states by double-digits, now, if he loses three of the four by a combined total of, say, six points, it will be considered devastating for Obama and not Clinton. That's the price Obama's paying for his financial lead and for winning 11 contests in a row. Of course, even Obama has remarked that the challenger needs to knock out the champ and not win on points…

*** On the trail: Clinton stumps in Toledo, OH before heading to Texas, where she stumps in Beaumont and then Austin; Huckabee travels across the Lone Star State, hitting Dallas, Abilene, Midland, San Antonio, and Houston; McCain begins his day in Phoenix, AZ before jetting to Texas; and Obama campaigns in San Antonio, Dallas, and Houston. Also, Bill Clinton spends his day in South Texas and El Paso.

Countdown to Ohio and Texas: 1 day
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 246 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 323 days

Click here to sign up for First Read emails
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

country is in serious truble.
only clinton can fix it!
vote obama is a big risk. I am very worry about he will change this great, beautiful america to a what kind of society?
wake up, peple!
An independent
Obama swung a backroom deal with Canada regarding NAFTA? Sounds like old time politics to me.
The more I read jaycee ventura's posts, the more skeptical I am about Obama.
It is time for "change", it's time for Hillary Clinton.hillaryclinton.com .
Thanks to jaycee, I now support Hillary Clinton
So Jaycee, after months of bashing Hillary and her supporters you now are turning on the charming sweet talk?  I'd say you've learned a lot from your mentor.  Neither Obama or Hillary are going to make it into the White House - there has been too much of a division and the DNC has just sat back and allowed it to happen.  Both "sides" Obama and Hillary have played dirty and shot themselves in the foot.  Both sides have alientated each other.  For a year that should have easily been the year of the Dems, it will once again stay with the ruling republicans.  What a shame.  
I supported the Clinton's during the nineties, but she once again showed her poor judgment last night on 60-minutes. She is a trained lawyer, and understands that her weak answer about the false smears will only reinforce the concern that uneducated voters have about Senator Obama. It is shameful . . .I hope that Bill Richardson & John Edwards remind her of the damage she is doing to the party!
There will be a swing of more than 10 delegates because Obama is beginning to be found out at last for the liar he is.

The polling trends have been towards Clinton in the last few days- this drip, drip of bad publicity for Obama is going to continue that trend.  The undecideds and waverers are going to have second thoughts about backing a candidate who is now being exposed for what he is - a politician on the make.
Tuesday will be a test for Clinton.  Will she go scorched earth and attempt to drag this out or do the right thing and bow out with some credibility left.  Shame on the media for giving in to her critiques about fairness of coverage.  The fact that she is still in the race after her month long string of losses shows that she is not getting dumped on too bad.  Were the situation reversed, Obama would have been run out on a rail.  Now, she has somehow fostered the illusion that Obama has to sweep all four or his campaign is in trouble.  She has already shown that she doesn't care much about the future of the party in the general, but I hope she will do the right thing and call it quits if she doesn't crush him in the two big contests on Tuesday.  Call it quits before the damage you are doing is permanent.
I am fed up with the politics as usual in DC.  I don't particularly want a lib running the country but Barack has a different tone.  Barack seems to be real smart and speaks of reaching out to all in America.  I like that.

Hillary just hits me wrong.  She draws a strong negative from me.

I am from Pennsylvania where I will vote for Barack in the April primary but hopefully the people in Ohio and Texas will send Hillary packing.  
Fact Check:

Good points. Hillary was supposed to win Texas and Ohio and less then two - three weeks ago was ahead by double digits. Now both States are virtual ties with Obama most likely comning out of Texas with the majority of delegates following the primary votes and the caucas meetings, as well as a split of delegates in Ohio. So where is this breaking her way movement? I don't see it.  
VOTE OBAMA !!!!
Hey First Read staff, did you ever find out what was the  content of Barack Obama's two-minute ads on this Monday night?  Inquiring minds want to know!
our country is in serious truble,only Clinton can fix it.
vote Obama is a big risk. he will change our great, beautiful country to what kind of society?
wake up, people!
an independent
I've come to a conclusion and it's been a long time coming. This democratic primary has been a battle ground, for the canidates and their constintuents. My girlfriend and I have almost broken up multiple times simply because she is staunch Hillary and I'm staunch Obama. But, over the past few days, I've grown to accept the first true Female contender as well... a phenomenon of equal granduer as her elliquent rival. I'm not saying here that I'm stopping my support for Obama. I still connect most with his message of hope and most specifically optimism about our country's future. But, to all my fellow Obamaites, Hillary Clinton is AMAZING! I woke up and read about how she has been up since 5 this morning talking to Ohio voters. Give the woman some credit for her passion. And for all you "rival" Clintonites, give the dude some credit! He is an inhuman FORCE. He built a brand name comprimable to his rival within a year and has inspired millions who haven't felt inspired in decades, if ever.
What's my point? We are the democratic party, people. And we have two amazing canidates. This should not be our demise in the national election. We are priming are contenders in an the most contested primary, probably ever. And though I like McCain as a person, I refuse to select him as my president. So, the day before possibly the last primary contest, all of you need to begin considering, how amazing your rivals have been and remember that your similarities greatly outweigh your differences.
The media is as responsible as anyone for parroting the Clinton campaign line about moving expectations, but the delegate math is clearer, and less kind to Clinton.

While narrow wins by Clinton in either Texas or Ohio (or both) may be trumpeted by her campaign as signs the race must continue, the reality is she needs to blow out Obama by substantial margins in the remaining contests to hope to come close to matching his pledged delegates.

The Clinton campaign has penned (pun not intended) their own demise in this campaign - with unprecedented name recognition, a large fundraising lead, and most of the party apparatus on board - they've run one of the least effective campaigns in our lifetimes.  

If Clinton doesn't succeed Tuesday by wide margins - 60% or better - she needs to withdraw. She can salvage some political capital with a graceful exit.
ME in CA

I too have wondered why the media doesn't question her 35 years expereince, maybe she can go for 40 years if she belonged to the girl scouts when growing up.  You can umpire major league baseball for 35 years, but if they put you in a baseball uniform and sit you on the bench it doesn't make you a ball player.

Jaycee

I agree Hillary & the Clintons ar the most polarizing people at a time when wew do not need this.  I am a 50+ white male, a life long Republican who switched to Independent so that I can vote for Obama in the primary in NC.  If he doen't get nominated I will vote for McCain in the national election because he does have "35 + Years" of true experience.
What a complete distortion of the delegate math: "if he loses three of the four by a combined total of, say, six points, it will be considered devastating for Obama".

It's Hillary that has to win by 65-70% just to catch up with Obama!  Impossible for her of course.
In regards to the allegations of the Obama chief domestic policy advisor contacting the Canadian government in regards to Obama's talks about NAFTA, it is very worrisome to me.  I consider myself to be a thinker.  In other words, I don't believe everything that I hear.  It is hard for me to believe that the Obama campaign would contact the Canadians and say this, even if it was true, before the primary election takes place in Ohio.  That does not make any sense.  What would be the purpose?  At this point and time, the candidates have no real authority on this matter so why would either feel the need to justify their positions on this matter to the Canadian government.  Furthermore, why would the Canadian government leak this information out?  If this was true, wouldn't it be to their benefit (Canadian government)to keep quiet about this matter?  In my opinion, it is the Conservative Canadian government that should not be trusted.  Why are the Canadians interested in our elections?  What do they stand to gain since they are obviously trying to sway votes?
To the 'not pass the ny bar in two tries' deal.  I can't say that I have anything against Hill even though I'm an Obama fan. Regardless, at least it wasn't 894 out of a naval academy class of 899, that would be the bottom 1% for McCain, ha!
Hillary goes, I vote for McCain. I will NOT ever trust Obama, especially the way the Media is fawning over him. My GOD... if anyone has divided this party, it is Obama, his stupid racist wife and the media. I can't vote for someonoe who isn't patriotic. Or who's wife isn't proud of america. She is not a lady, but rather a rat.
Why do you think the Republicans have urged their flock to vote for Obama?  There's even a movement by Republicans to become a Democrat for a day!  Why?  Why did big Republican donors gave so heavily to get Obama off the ground last year?  Why has the corporate-owend media viciously gone after Hillary since the middle of last year?  So they could have a so-called liberal democrat in the White House?  I don't think so.  

Their entire strategy has been to knock out Hillary Clinton.  Why?  Step back for a minute and look at the facts.  Bill Clinton did the most for average Americans than any president since FDR, most of the time against a Republican congress.  Jobs? UP. Wages for middle income earners?  UP.  Crime? DOWN.  teen pregnancy? DOWN.  Drug use? DOWN.  Individual net worth? UP. Home ownership? UP. National debt left by Reagan/Buch?  WIPED OUT and HUGE SURPLUS ACCUMULATED.  The middle class never had it so good.
Everyone needs to read the following article.  Karl Rove's whole strategy has been to knock out Hillary and then remake Obama in the Republicans' image and take him out in the general.  

You may think of Obama as the stronger candidate against McCain.  Wait til the Republicans get him in their sights.  If he knocks out Hillary, the Republicans will remake him "in their own image" and transform his positive image into a negative one.  That's apart from aksing Americans to vote for someone with no military or international relations experience in a time of war.  It's a Rovian delight.

Everyone needs to read this article to understand the "through the looking glass" strategy of Rove and Co.:  

http://thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Winter08/2008Election.html

Whom do you think Hillary will have available EVERY DAY to consult with on every major decision or policy initiative?  YES - Bill Clinton, the most successful Democratic president in 60 years.  Why do you think the Republicans went after him so viciously?  Because he was morally challenged?  I don't think so! The reason was that he was EFFECTIVE and they could not defeat him any other way.  

Do you honestly think Republicans in the Congress are going to break the leashes of their corporate masters in order to play ball with Barack?  If so, then I have some swampland in Arizona for you.  Remember when they shut down the government?

The Clintons have been there and they have done that - against a Republican majority.  Oh, you say, that's the past and we need to look forward etc.  Ask yourself:  how many effective presidents have we actually had?  We have the chance to have the most effective president back in the White House and you  want to throw it aside for an untested, unvetted young man?  Please don't let the Republicans and corporate media take that chance away from us.  There really is too much at stake in this election.  

Yes, if Hillary wins, we will have to pay a price. The price we will have to pay for the progress if Hillary gets elected will be to endure another corporate media propaganda onslaught against the Clintons.  I think most Americans now understand that for what it is and I am willing to pay that price.
Maybe I am crazy but this Canada thing is a bit fishy...I think it is odd that we know that the Bill Clinton was just associated with the Canadian business person Frank Giustra with a whole lot of money donated to the Clinton foundation and now on this page it is stated the question  -- Why is the conservative Canadian government leaking this memo and getting involved in a Democratic primary race?
keeping your word=Ill. Senate- Vote me in I want to work for you!!    oh wait this looks better       US Senate=Russett ask if he would use it as stepping stone-Obama said thats a "silly" question. We have heard that ans in debate. Now Vote for me dont listen to anyone else. Uniter =unites Blacks -than  oh dont have time i am campaigning. Double talk,double satandards,and double faced.Bad judgement -he thought Americans are stupid and easly led.Not good for job!!!
Hillary is a fine senator; she could even be the majority leader someday.  But Obama is far-and-away best suited to be president at this moment in our history because of his generation, his intellect, his unique background.
What a surprise! BO is starting to stink! Hope its not too late again for the dems. It might be a John Kerry situation again.......this time people choose  hope over experience. Boy are people stupid!!! Oh thats right, we've had moron George for 7 yrs, so I guess its not too shocking.
The Obama/Canada memo has been around for days.  Its just that MSNBC decided not to report on it.  In the memo, we find out that one of Obama's advisors met with a Canadian official to reassure him that Obama's "anti-NAFTA" stance was really a bunch of political talk.  In other words, he was pandering in Ohio.  
Thank you for picking up the story about Clinton's comment on 60 minutes.  This is BARELY being covered. And Hillary says the media is biased against HER?

I am FURIOUS that she would say such a thing knowing darn well that it is an out an out lie.  America is seeing Hillary's true colors know that she's under pressure.  This shows someone who has no moral integrity and will do ANYTHING to knock someone down and build their own self interests.

In contrast, Barack Obama co-sponsored legislation to HELP his (presumed) opponent, John McCain when the argument came up that he may not be able to run for President because he was born in Panama.

There is very little difference in policy between Obama and Clinton BUT A HUGE DIFFERENCE IN CHARACTER.

If you want someone for President who actually has some values and practices those values- the choice should be crystal clear.
'...Hillary Clinton lost the Jan. 26 vote there by a 2-to-1 margin and saw her standing with African Americans nationwide become strained...'

Race baiting by Bill and the Clinton campaign sealed Hillary's fate....

POETIC JUSTICE

'..."If there's fighting internally, the candidate has to step up and make it clear what direction she wants to go and stop this stuff dead in its tracks..'


From the LA Times:


'...How did the Clinton campaign get here?

By Peter Nicholas, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 3, 2008

WASHINGTON -- As they mapped out a campaign schedule for Bill Clinton, top aides to Hillary Rodham Clinton kept his time short in South Carolina. They were probably going to lose the state, they figured, and they wanted their most powerful surrogate to move on to Georgia, Alabama and other Southern states.

But the former president shelved the plan, according to campaign aides. Day after day he stayed in South Carolina, getting into angry confrontations with the press and others. In the end, Hillary Clinton lost the Jan. 26 vote there by a 2-to-1 margin and saw her standing with African Americans nationwide become strained.

Hillary Clinton may be one of the most disciplined figures in national politics, but she has presided over a campaign operation riven by feuding, rival fiefdoms and second-guessing of top staff members.

Those tensions partly explain why Clinton today stands where, just a few months ago, few expected she'd be: struggling to catch up to Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination. If she loses either of the crucial contests Tuesday in Texas and Ohio, Clinton may face calls from senior party officials to end her campaign.

Some polls show her leading in Ohio but tied in Texas; the race in both states is considered close.

Already, some in Clinton's senior staff are pointing fingers over what went wrong, with some of the blame aimed at Clinton herself. As the race unfolded, neither Clinton nor anyone else resolved the internal power struggles that played out with destructive effect and continue to this day.

Chief strategist and pollster Mark Penn clashed with senior advisor Harold Ickes, former deputy campaign manager Mike Henry and others. Field organizers battled with Clinton's headquarters in northern Virginia. Campaign themes were rolled out and discarded, reflecting tensions among a staff bitterly divided over what Clinton's basic message should be.

The dispute over Bill Clinton's schedule shows how easily plans can unravel. Some campaign staffers didn't expect to win South Carolina overall, but "our strategy was to go after specific districts in South Carolina" to add to the delegate total while freeing Bill Clinton to spend time in other Southern states, said a Clinton campaign aide.

But Bill Clinton said " 'I need to be in South Carolina,' " the aide said. "It was a one-man mission out there."

Obama, who leads Clinton in delegates, would pose problems for any candidate. But aides to Clinton said the dysfunction within her campaign team made its task that much tougher.

Joe Trippi, a senior advisor to John Edwards' now-dropped Democratic campaign, said: "At some point the candidate has to step in and bust heads and say 'Enough!'

"If there's fighting internally, the candidate has to step up and make it clear what direction she wants to go and stop this stuff dead in its tracks. Otherwise there's going to be a struggle for power and control right until the end. It's crippling."

Last month, after a series of defeats, Hillary Clinton chose a new campaign manager, replacing Patti Solis Doyle. But she left in place many senior people, including Penn and Ickes, who have been involved in incessant turf wars.

As the campaign faces a make-or-break moment, some high-level officials are trying to play down their role in the campaign. Penn said in an e-mail over the weekend that he had "no direct authority in the campaign," describing himself as merely "an outside message advisor with no campaign staff reporting to me."

"I have had no say or involvement in four key areas -- the financial budget and resource allocation, political or organizational sides. Those were the responsibility of Patti Solis Doyle, Harold Ickes and Mike Henry, and they met separately on all matters relating to those areas."

Howard Wolfson, the campaign's communications chief, answered that it was Penn who had top responsibility for both its strategy and message. Another aide said Penn spoke to Clinton routinely about the campaign's message and ran daily meetings on the topic.

One running debate within Clinton's campaign was whether her defeats -- she has lost 11 straight contests -- were due to organizational lapses or a faulty message.

Some aides say organizational problems were the most significant, as Obama outworked Clinton in many states and sent in organizers earlier.

That problem may go back to well before the lead-off contest, in Iowa. In June, Clinton's Iowa staff requested 150 organizers; headquarters approved a budget for 90.

By September, Iowa staff were sending out warnings about Obama's strength. "We are being outnumbered on the ground on a daily basis by his campaign, and it is beginning to show results," said a memo to top campaign officials on Sept. 26, about three months before the state's caucuses...'

The decline and fall of the House of Clinton.....

Hillary's 'career of evil' is coming to an end...

OK,  Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont,  tommorrow is your big day to show you are grown ups who are eligible to vote for a change in who you want in the White House.
Show us you can look past the color of someone's skin or their religion and make your pick of the content of their character.  Let go of your old biases, take the high road to a better America
She will do ANYTHING to get elected.
Chuck Todd: Please explain why the MSNBC delegate count differs so much from the CNN count?
I am DISGUSTED by Clinton's comments on 60 Minutes about Obama being Muslim. For an attorney who demands concise statements - and demanded Obama "reject" instead of "denounce" Farrakhan's support - she was certainly "wishy-washy" in her response. She should not be allowing this vicious rumor to go on. This is only contributing to the fear-mongering. She is despicable - God forbid she campaign on her merits because she has none.
The race was over after after the blowouts in Wisconsin and Hawaii.  She's down by 15 in North Carolina now, but will need to win there by 40 points.  Everyone talks about how Obama gets a free pass with the media, but nobody wants to point out the Emperor is wearing no clothes (notice I didn't go with pantsuit).

http://infogiant.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/is-hillary-getting-a-free-pass/
It seems that you pretty like to make clinton bolder than ever. So biased and disgusting.
UTICA, New York—The Democratic Party presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio remain too close to call between Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, with momentum sloshing back and forth, a new Zogby International poll for Reuters/C-SPAN/Houston Chronicle two-day telephone tracking poll shows. As voters in these two big states prepare to wrap up their voting tomorrow, neither candidate has been able to break away from the other.

The two delegate-rich states with elections on Tuesday are among the last of the big states left in the primary election season, and both candidates stand to split the delegates under the partys proportional delegate apportionment scheme.

Texas - Democrats
2-29/3-2
2-28/3-1
2-27/29
2-26/28

Clinton
44%
43%
43%
42%

Obama
47%
47%
45%
48%

Gravel
2%
1%
<1%
<1%

Someone else
1%
2%
3%
3%

Not sure
6%
7%
8%
7%

I think Obama is feeling the heat to close the deal because there is more news coverage now on him and it is calling into question his experience and past. He was on ABC's Good Morning America this morning and he was asked about his deal on the house he bought. Obama would not answer the question yes/no on whether he would supply documents on that sale. Looking a little guilty or like he has something got hide. Also, the head-to-head national polls between him and McCain are now showing him behind and show Hillary even with McCain. The argument that he would do better against McCain in November no longer holds water. So, he is trying very hard not to show he is becoming desperate. The longer it goes the better for Hillary. If Hillary wins both Texas and Ohio, I think Obama is on the ropes.
I worked with Hillary as long ago as 1993 and have always respected her smarts and toughness.  But the "as far as I know, Obama is not a Muslim quote" is so war-roomy, calculating and nasty that there is no way I can ever vote for her again.  Barack is right.  This country, its dollar and its reputation, need a fresh start that is inclusive and positive about American leadership and aims.
I'm glad that Iraq is starting to get some play again.  I don't believe that the Demacratic candidates are going to let Bush and McCain claim that the surge is working when none of the political benchmarks have been met and their are still over 4 million refugees in country with no economy.  We have armed all sides of the conflict and we are supervising a tactical cease fire until we leave.

Additionally Bush and McCain claim they won't talk to dictators but they will talk to Musharef, China, Putin, Saudia Arabia, Jordan, Eygypt, etc but not with Cuba and Iran, how bizarre.  And what is even more bizarre while we have lost 4000 killed and 30000 wounded and are proclaiming that Iran is the biggest threat our puppet government in Iraq is giving the president of Iran a heros welcome and proclaiming them as their biggest supporter.  ANd to top that off the president of Iran who is in Iraq is bad mouthing the very American service people who are keeping their corrupt government in place.  WE can't talk to dictators, that we don't like, but the Iraq goverment can?  Its time to make Bush and McCain explain this total contradiction in policy.  If we are supposedly there for democracy and all the parties are blaming us for the turmoil and violence, then why are we going to stay there 100 years.  Bizarre.
I thought it was over on SUPER TUESDAY,then you guys declared it over after the run of wins in the small states now its over after texas well then it will be over.
Hey lets circulate a picture of Hillary hugging some woman then make vague suggestions that she is a lesbeian and have Omama go on National TV and say he takes her at her word that she is not. Hillary is a lowdown scumbag. Even if she is the nominee, She will have destroyed the Democratic Party in the process. Her scumbag politics will cost her many, many votes, and the Republicans will win in November.
Don't forget people.  Saturday is the Wyoming caucuses (which Obama will win) and a week from today is the Mississippi primary (which Obama will win).  So even if Clinton gains 5 to 10 delegates from tomorrow, she will promptly lose them in the next week.  She will then go to Pennsylvania for SEVEN weeks to campaign (where polls have already closed her once huge lead to 4%).  Even if she wins Pennsylvania she will net only a few delegates or none at all since she was not even able to field a full slate of delegates.  Obama will win NC, OR, SD, and is leading in IN.  Clinton can't close the pledged delegate lead.  If she somehow becomes the nominee it will have only been by stealing the nomination.  That will mean a McCain White House.  This woman has no chance at becoming president.
I am astounded that Morning Joe wasted so much time this morning on Senator Clinton's stupid remark about her answer to the 6o Minutes question regarding Senator Obama's religion. What else would you have expected her to say, in South Carolina it was the snide remarks President Clinton made about race now Senator Clinton is taking the same approach about religion. Both of them will say and do anything to discredit Senator Obama. I hope the people of Ohio,Texas,Rhode Island and Vermont see through this vile campaign and vote for Senator Obama
I'm glad that Iraq is starting to get some play again.  I don't believe that the Demacratic candidates are going to let Bush and McCain claim that the surge is working when none of the political benchmarks have been met and their are still over 4 million refugees in country with no economy.  We have armed all sides of the conflict and we are supervising a tactical cease fire until we leave.

Additionally Bush and McCain claim they won't talk to dictators but they will talk to Musharef, China, Putin, Saudia Arabia, Jordan, Eygypt, etc but not with Cuba and Iran, how bizarre.  And what is even more bizarre while we have lost 4000 killed and 30000 wounded and are proclaiming that Iran is the biggest threat our puppet government in Iraq is giving the president of Iran a heros welcome and proclaiming them as their biggest supporter.  ANd to top that off the president of Iran who is in Iraq is bad mouthing the very American service people who are keeping their corrupt government in place.  WE can't talk to dictators, that we don't like, but the Iraq goverment can?  Its time to make Bush and McCain explain this total contradiction in policy.  If we are supposedly there for democracy and all the parties are blaming us for the turmoil and violence, then why are we going to stay there 100 years.  Bizarre.
Why isn't the Obama NAFTA news breaking news? Where is the press in this? The people who will vote tomorrow need to know what is going on. Is Obama playing old time politics-saying one thing in public and another in private? This should be front and center for today! If it were any other candidate, we would hear about all day.
Hillary and her campaign have been spreading these Muslin rumors as a last minute campaign move in Ohio.
If the people saw the "60 min." clip you would be able to tell she is behind this Muslin rumor 100%.
Hillary and her campaign have been spreading these Muslin rumors as a last minute campaign move in Ohio.
If the people saw the "60 min." clip you would be able to tell she is behind this Muslin rumor 100%.
New polls just out, the momentum has definitly shifted to Hillary Clinton. Come visit hillaryclinton.com .
For those of you who haven't already made up your mind, maybe this will help.  This is the endorsement from the Dallas Morning News:

Editorial: We recommend Barack Obama




11:08 AM CST on Sunday, March 2, 2008

Texas Democrats have a chance to make history as they choose between two qualified presidential candidates. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton often seem to be singing from the same hymnbook, but that doesn't mean this race is a close call.

On questions of substance and leadership style, Mr. Obama is the better choice.

In sharp contrast to Mrs. Clinton's antics mocking his optimism, Mr. Obama has shown that it is possible to have both hope and intellectual heft. Her campaign has confused proximity to power with work experience, selectively taking credit for her husband's accomplishments.

Also Online
Voter Guide: Comparing Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama
At times, Obama-mania has threatened to obscure the substantive differences between the two candidates' proposed policies. A close examination shows that Mr. Obama is on the right side of several key issues.

Both senators aim to overhaul our health care system by lowering premiums and expanding subsidies. Mrs. Clinton's more mandate-centered approach could be a tougher sell, while Mr. Obama allows for more individual choice and avoids the appearance of insurance by coercion.

Both Democrats offer a significant upgrade from the current administration on environmental and energy issues. Both plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase our reliance on renewable resources. But Mr. Obama has rightly acknowledged the need to include nuclear energy in the mix; Mrs. Clinton has hedged.

Mr. Obama has echoed many of this newspaper's reservations about America's flawed death penalty system. And while he still allows for capital punishment in particularly heinous cases, he championed much-needed reforms in his home state. Mrs. Clinton, at times, has been an avowed death-penalty supporter; recently, she has chosen instead to highlight her push for more DNA testing.

Mrs. Clinton once touted NAFTA as one of her husband's biggest successes but now is threatening to withdraw from the free-trade accord. Mr. Obama is making similar threats but at least seeks ways to deliver on NAFTA's promise: microfinancing and financial aid to create jobs and increase incentives for Mexicans to stay at home.

On Iraq, Mrs. Clinton seeks an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops that, she says, could be completed over a single year. Her plan offers minimal military recourse in the likely event of chaos and civil war following America's withdrawal.

Mr. Obama has a slightly more gradual, flexible drawdown plan with the possibility of keeping a sizeable force in Iraq or nearby to pursue al-Qaeda fighters, train Iraqi forces and deploy quickly when crises erupt.

Mrs. Clinton's plan also is problematic because it hinges on holding talks with our enemies. She wants all of Iraq's neighbors – including Syria and Iran – to join a U.S.-organized regional security conference. But she hasn't explained how to accomplish this if Iran and Syria fail to accept the preconditions Mrs. Clinton insists that such "rogue regimes" must meet before her administration would meet with them.

Mr. Obama favors limited dialogue without preconditions, reasoning that communication – as opposed to silence – is the best way to resolve differences between enemies. That's sensible.

All in all, Mr. Obama offers Texas Democrats the best choice for leadership, for judgment – and for substance.

We are in a recession created by the Bush administration. Foreclosures are rising. Living wage jobs are MIA.

Hillary Clinton will hit the ground running to bring back the American dream. For those currently living below the poverty line through no fault of their own and bring back our middle class.

Obama needs more than 2 years in public office to fully grasp what our needs are...the presidency is no place for rookies.

Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas, and Vermont vote early,
vote Hillary our country needs her!!!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=724249

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google