ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama tangles with the press

Posted: Monday, March 03, 2008 5:58 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
SAN ANTONIO, Texas -- Led by the Chicago press corps that has covered Obama for years, the candidate today faced a barrage of questions in what turned out to be a contentious news conference.

Questions centered on why his campaign had denied that a meeting occurred between his chief economic advisor and Canadian officials as well as questions on his relationship with Tony Rezko, a Chicago land developer and fast food magnate, now on trial for corruption charges.
 
Obama claimed that when he had first denied the meeting between Austan Goolsbee and any members of the Canadian administration he provided "the information that [he] had at the time."
 
He added, "Nobody reached out to the Canadians to try to reassure them. They reached out, unbeknownst to the rest of us; They reached out to Mr. Goolsbee, who provided them with a tangible conversation and repeated what we've said on the campaign trail."
 
When did the meeting take place? Why did the Canadian officials reach out? Did Goolsbee not come forward right away and admit the meeting to Campaign Manager David Plouffe and Obama when both denied it last week? These are questions that went unanswered as the press conference was cut short.
 
Much of the back and forth, though, between reporters and Obama was about his relationship with Tony Rezko, with reporters demanding to know why new details were emerging from the case though Obama and his staff had claimed they had been forthright with all the details. 
 
Obama and Carol Marin, political editor at NBC5 in Chicago and columnist at the Chicago Sun-Times, tangled over how up front Obama had been about Rezko. Obama cut off her line of questioning, saying that Marin's questions were personally motivated.
 
"Carol, can I just say I have to really dispute this,” Obama said. “It is true that you wanted an individual sit down, but I don't think that's fair to speak for the entire Chicago press corps because on this -- Let me finish," he interjected as she tried to interrupt.

“Before you were reporting on these issues I had an avail,” Obama said, pointing to members of the Chicago press corps who were present, “where I literally stood there and took every question people could think of."
 
Lynn Sweet from the Chicago Sun-Times then jumped in and told Obama that he may have answered questions for the Chicago press, but many other reporters hadn't had a chance to hear him on the issue.
 
"I just want to make that point an issue," Obama said. "You may still have questions, which I'm happy to answer, but I don't think it's fair to suggest somehow that we've been trying to hide the ball on this. There have been more attacks. There have been several hundred stories written on this issue. The fact of the matter remains unchallenged."
 
Obama went on to detail his relationship with Rezko, repeating that the land deal had been a "bone-headed" move. 
 
"On the other hand, there have been no allegations that I betrayed the public trust,” he argued. “There have been no allegations that I did him any favors.”
 
A third reporter followed, asking Obama why information about fundraisers or other details had not been answered by the campaign. He raised the issue of how details were emerging in the case, like the fact that Obama and Rezko had toured the property that resulted in the questionable land deal between the two men.
 
Obama continued to say that reporters' interest was due to the fact this was "a hot story."
 
He claimed that his campaign would be happy to provide the details, but when asked why the campaign hadn't been forthcoming, he said, "What happens is these requests I think can go on forever, and, at some point, we've tried to respond to what's pertinent to the question that's been raised."
 
He added, "There's no question that he raised money for us, and there's no dispute that we've tried to get rid of that money."
 
Toward the end of the press conference, the question of Goolsbee's meeting was raised again. Obama answered curtly and then walked out after a staffer called last question. The press erupted with shouts, but Obama continued to walk out.
 
He paused only to say, "Come on guys; I answered like eight questions. We're running late.”

On the flight from San Antonio to Dallas, Obama, unsurprisingly, did not wander back to make small talk with the traveling press corps.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hurry November ... hurry!  Then we'll have just one person to beat up on.  HA!
I see that censor comments
Well Well, Americans want 4 years or Oratory in the White House. They get what they deserve.

A talk show host job it is not.
Well. If Hil-Liar-y thinks she could win with the burned  Democratic base in November ... dream on.

My family has never voted Republican but we will vote for McCain if Hil-Liar-y would be the Democratic nominee. And so would be millions - she is the ultimate fake, the ultimate devider.

I am glad that I live in a swing state !!!! My vote would count double against Hillary (by voting for McCain).

OBAMA'08
It took a skit on Saturday Night Live for the press to wake up and stop with the favoritism. I'm glad the writers strike ended before November's election.
Most people do not know the facts about this Rezko thing.  I have read that the seller agreed to split the property in two; one lot had a house on it and the other was a vacant lot.  Apparently, Rezko paid full price for the vacant lot and somehow Obama got a $300,000 discount on the house.  That is all I know, because not much has been written about it.  However, I think that will change.  The press now seems more interested in this deal now that Tony Rezko's trial has started in Chicago.
HaHaHa!  The Obama supporters are still standing by their man in the face of the serious accusations.  Of course Canada does not want to get caught in the middle of our presidential race - so they backed off.  But the guy didn't tell Obama he met with the Canadian embassy?  Get real!  And a high powered man from Canada attends a meeting with possibly the next president of the U.S. and lies on his report?  Only diehards will stand by all this.  And, hey, this is only the beginning.  
Well, Hillary should be elated - this Rezco thing is a weak story that has been thoroughly vetted and it is the ONLY thing Hillary has to throw that may stick. Hillary's campaign representative started obsessing about this on Stephanopolis' show Sunday - but I thought this was to ridiculous to stick - apparently it has stuck despite being utterly ridiculous and thoroughly examined already.

What a disgusting, deplorable thing to do. I'm sickened by Hillary - and as a woman I am embarrassed by her tactics.

Obama needs to stop being so nice to her - he needs to throw the kitchen sink back. Whitewater, Travelgate, dealings at the Rose law firm (where Hillary gained 15 of her "35 years" of experience)and on...and on....and on....and on...with the scandals with which Hillary's name is associated....
Tax returns - public documents - William Jefferson Clinton library/foundation contributions....where is all the information? Sounds like getting a pass to me.
Also there are still dozens of questions from the 90's such as Whitewater, Vince Foster, scandals, etc. She would be a timb bomb for the Democrats. Obama may have questions to answer, but she is old bathwater at best.
Wow!  I'm seeing what is happening here.  It's almost as if there is a media "group-think" happening.  We love Obama. He's golden.  We love writing and talking about him.  He's a rich character.  He inspires us.  Hillary's upset.  Oh, no!  We got the Clinton machine turning against us.  Let's turn on Obama now.  Let's dissect and polverize him.  Let's manipulate popular opinion.  If it is true that Hillary Clinton was being treated unfairly in the media, I think it is now true that instead of leveling the playing field, the media has tilted it in her favor. The problem is, by tilting the ground in her favor, more negativity and degradation is surfacing because this is what her campaign has been about.  And while I don't think that Barack Obama should be favored, anymore than I think Hillary should be favored by the media, at least when Barack Obama was in the media forefront he uplifted, inspired, and moved us to think of all the wonderful potential in ourselves and in our United States.
What about Peter Paul and Hillary?  The press has seemed to completely ignore all Hillary's past (go to YouTube and watch "Hillary Clinton Scandal 1/2").  I think this is pretty ridiculous.  The Clinton machine doing its best steamroller impression.
Just answer the questions Senator.  What are you so afraid of?  Please, tell us why you denied the Canada meeting took place.  You didn't know a member of your campaign was going to Canada?  Really?  Really?

And while you're at it why don't you explain that the land sale of the portion of Rezko property you bought, supposedly owned by his wife, helped defray debts that Tony incurred while he tried to hide his assets from his creditors?  He just wanted you to have a bigger back yard.  Isn't that sweet?

And please please explain how it is that you can honestly say that you don't take money from federal lobbyists when you collect it from law firms with federal lobbying operations and pacs?  And why you think it's okay to take money from firms that have pending issues in congress who also happen to have multimillion dollar lobbying operations in Washington?

And I'd love to hear more about the grant the Woods Fund gave, while you were on its board, to an organization founded and run by an employee of the PLO (that's a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel...but you probably knew that because you're such a foreign policy genius).

And can we hear a little more about the change you're going to bring to Washington?  'Cause all I see is the same old crap.

I emailed your campaign several weeks ago saying that you're a liar and a fraud and that it was only a matter of time before everyone found out.  

Time's up Senator.
There is just not much the press is reporting on Obama, only the same old crap over and over. Hillary is an easy target because she is:
divisive
uses aggressive tactics to draw the attention of the media
Desperate
Very ambitious
The media has already had enough of Hillary in these 8 years in the White House and 7 years in the Senate. This long Clinton-media relationship has soured over Hillary's polarizing persona and meaningless complaints of media bias.
It is not because the media is "mean" towards Hillary; it is because Hillary has already had her share ofmedia spotlight for so long. During this period of public appearances, Hillary has thrust herself with her stupid antics. All the media can do is report on those antics and her portrayal of herself as a divisive politician through her own actions.
You Hillary supporters need to quit babbling about the media being deliebrately in favor of Obama.
I do not expect this to be posted , but your coverage is so biased in favor of Mrs. Clinton, that it is laughable.  Today on your Political page, you show a headline that Mrs. Clinton leads in 4 polls, you do not show that it is 4 polls in Ohio,as per the story ( incidentally the Reuters/Zogby poll shows Obama leading in Ohio ) and not in Texas where Obama leads in most polls. Most days you have a flattering picture of Mrs. Clinton on the page.  You report extensively on President Clinton,  in effect , giving her double  the coverage
To quote a real journalist  "Good night and good luck"
I dont trust this Barack Hussein Obama. He may deny his muslim roots but all his close friends are muslims from Middle eastern region. Rezko a Syrian born, is a close friend of Iraqi born billionaire Nadhmi Auchi.

This man is so dangerous to our country. He will sell us to the Islamic fundamentals. He says he opposed the war and if he did it may have had more to do with his Iraqi frinds rather than concern for the US.

I dont trust him.
THE PIECES ARE STARTING TO CRUMBLE, OBAMA IS A LOOSER.
There is only 1 reason why the Press is behaving in this manner towards Barack......and that reason is their all consuming desire to keep the Democrat Primary tight, and if possible, in disarray.......It is good for their ratings ($$$$$) and that's all the cynical media cares about!
"Obama is done" ...?  Ummm... you're not paying much attention.  

Obama's been putting up with a great deal here, and the public is impressed with his candor, integrity and humanity.  Impressed enough to make him the Democratic candidate.  Shout all you like, there will be evidence in about thirty hours.

The Rezko thing is a non-story.  He received funds from a shady Chicago land dealer.  He donated them to charity.  No one has alleged that he did the shady guy any favors.  Have you never known anyone, even called them a friend, who turned out to be of less than stellar character?  I can list several in my own past, but I don't think that impugns my own character.

Rezko also partnered with several reputable Chicago non-profits on projects to provide low-income housing.  He hoodwinked lots of good folks.  That doesn't have anything to do with Obama's character, which, frankly, impresses me deeply.  How many people do you know who would turn down big money law jobs to work in poor neighborhoods at $12,000/year.  That's exactly what he did.  That's not a photo op, it's not a youth group mission trip.  It's two years.  That's integrity, and integrity is what we need so desperately.
There's no there there, If the Clinton's want to take it to the mat even when the numbers show they can't win.....then let's do it! We can take this all the way to the convention. If the Clinton's try to steal the nomination because it's rightfully Hillary's and succeed the Republicans will be back in the white house, and the Democratic party will be history. Let's Do It! The Clinton's with all their scandals and lie's (and she's just getting warmed up)will be  remembered for it all.......Let's Do It!
The corporate media is finally realizing this guy may be our next president, and now they're trying to sabotage him. It was okay so long as he was the exotic challenger. But now - a rookie who doesn't owe anyone anything might be president? How would they CONTROL him, god forbid?
Is the media turning nasty at the last minute, what's the point? What is the point of building up the momentum of Obama to then try to demolish it at the last minute, what on earth is the point of doing that?
THE MEDIA ARE SUCH SHEEP.DID NOT KNOW SO MANY WATCHED SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE. IF HE DID A ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS NEWS CONFERENCE, SHOULD THE MEDIA NOT READ THE TRANSCRIPTS FIRST. IF THEY WERE ASKING THE SAME QUESTIONS THAN THEY WERE CREATED THE NEWS, NOT REPORTING IT. WE ALL NO THE MEDIA HAS BEEN CRITICIZED FOR BEING EASY ON OBAMA SO LETS PICK TODAY TO BE"TOUGH". WHAT A JOKE. IF OBAMA WAS DIRTY ON RESZKO WE ALL WOULD KNOW IT BY NOW
I guess Obama should have had more BBQ's for the press, then this would have never happened and he could still be considered a "Mavrick".

DOH!
Sounds like this was an unscheduled press conference.
Obama has a schedule to keep.
Don't wory you will be Rezkoed out over time.  
Upcoming scandals will include the Peter Paul fraud lawsuit against the Clinton's, and the Hillary's refusal to return $170,000 to IPA a company on trial for 103 cases of sexual harassment.    

This is the change we can expect from Obama?  Obama has run his campaign on being the candidate of change. Of being different than other politicians.

OBama getting angry and running out on the reporters
while in the middle of questioning him, just goes to show you that he can't stand the heat.

Answer the questions OBama.......we the voters have a right to know.
My fellow Americans,

I have, for too long, endured the divisiveness that continues to erode our country.  For too long, have special interest held sway in our government—this alone is criminal.  And for too long have I watched the price of oil cause inflation in the United States (I believe this is a plot to destabilize our country’s economy by greed oil companies who set record profits each quarter, and others. . .)  For too long, have I watched our valiant men in uniform, sacrificed (some of which were my friends.) As an American, I am tired of seeing my government (who takes 25-30% of my hard earned wages) unable to agree on almost anything.  This has to stop.  Now, I am sure Hillary Clinton would like to bring our broken country back together, but I fear she simply has too much fight in her personality to be anything other than divisive in her politics as we saw in the last debate, and we continue to see in her negative political attacks. Furthermore, I remember the good and the bad times of the previous Clintons, and no matter how many “super delegates are in their pocket,” I do not wish to revisit those times. I have, for too long endured political speeches that promised only more back- biting once the election was won.  However, as I am often reminded, we are all in this together. After all, we are all Americans.  Republicans see things one way, Democrats see it another, Independents like myself are wishing for the two opposing sides to come together because  WE ARE REALLY ALL ON THE  SAME SIDE!—The American Side.  Now I do not want socialism, or anything similar to it.  What I do want is for my government to work and not be dysfunctional. For too long, have we “The People” paid for a government bought by special interest, and for far too long have we sent money to other countries while some Americans are poor, homeless, and helpless.  For too long, has our governments turned their backs on public education, health care, and the working man/woman.  For far too long have I read about our fallen heroes, our soldiers who will never return--home.
As an American, I deserve better from our politicians.

Now, I do not know Obama personally; however, he is the only person who actually has plans of “substance” ready to address these problems.  I say give the man a chance because he seems like our best  “hope” for the future.  Time will tell.
Senator Obama, despite the wishes of his kool-aid followers, is not as pure as the driven snow. How the heck did he get from street organizer to Presidential candidate in such a short period of time? Wake up people!

And, of course, you answer is to drag up the Ken Starr garbage -none of which was proven - to combat the truth about Obama coming to the forefront.

Hey - Senator Stutterer - where are the Afghanistan Senate hearings - Oh I forgot, you are too busy running for President. God forbid you get elected the George Bush reading of the goat book will look statesmen-like.

Hillary Clinton is the only choice for America's future and safety.
REPORTERS HOOTING AND HOLLERING WHEN HIS STAFF CALLED LAST QUESTION. OUTRAGEOUS. THIS IS NOT ONLY LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM. SOME COULD CONSTRUE IT AS MEDIA BEHAVIOR BEING THE NEWS STORY. UNHEARD OF!
The media is so self-serving.  They want to see this campaign go on as long as possible.  Suddenly, they are resurrecting stories that have been reported to death, just to take swipes at Obama.  Senator Obama has answered every question about the Rezko matter.  In fact, he's answered them multiple times.
As a supporter of Senator Obama, I want to hear the story and I want to hear answers to the questions.  It doesn't alarm me that there are questions about the appearance of impropriety.  No more than Senator Clinton's supporters appear to be bothered by the ample proof of her poor judgment during her tenure in the White House and prior, and her attacking and smearing of the numerous women her husband was caught with.  The inconsistency of her record of supporting women's rights, but denigrating women who cross her, is characteristic of her situational ethics.   Just as running for Senator in a state in which she never had residency before it suited her political ambitions.  Senator Clinton's personal and political history is replete with subsuming principle to ambition and denying the written record for the sake of positioning.  

   
Obamo is for us. He is the only true canadate. Do Not Let Another Clinton OR A Repuplican in Office.
Would it make any sence at all for him to meet with the Canadian goverment or its offcials on this issue NAFTA and remember WHO it was that created NAFTA and who said it was such a boon to the American worker when you remember that than you will know who it was behind it.Hint,Hint The Clintons

 
Obama Bought Home Without Rezko Discount, Seller Says (Update1)

By Timothy J. Burger

Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The couple who sold Barack Obama his Chicago home said the Illinois senator's $1.65 million bid ``was the best offer'' and they didn't cut their asking price because a campaign donor bought their adjacent land, according to e-mails between Obama's presidential campaign and the seller.

The Illinois senator has said he made a ``boneheaded'' move in involving contributor Antoin ``Tony'' Rezko, a Chicago businessman, in the purchase of the property on June 15, 2005.

Rezko's wife, Rita, also an Obama donor, bought the adjoining plot in Hyde Park from the couple, Fredric Wondisford and Sally Radovick, for the $625,000 asking price, the same day that Obama bought the house for $300,000 less than the asking price. Antoin Rezko was under federal investigation at the time.

Rezko was indicted on unrelated fraud charges 16 months later, in October 2006. Obama has since returned about $85,000 in campaign contributions made or raised by Rezko. Obama's Democratic presidential rival, Hillary Clinton, has questioned Obama's ties with Rezko.

``We still don't have answers about Senator Obama and his dealings with Mr. Rezko,'' Clinton, 60, a New York senator, said in a Feb. 11 interview with the Politico newspaper.

The sellers hadn't previously made their side of the story public out of concern for their privacy, according to Bill Burton, a spokesman for Obama's campaign. They approached Obama's Senate office 15 months ago and agreed to break their silence now through the campaign out of concern that the story was being distorted in the media, Burton said.

Toured Property

Burton said Obama, 46, toured the property with Rezko for 15 to 30 minutes at some point before the purchase. Burton said Obama wanted Rezko's opinion of the property because Rezko was a real-estate developer in the area. Burton said he didn't know when the pre-sale tour occurred.

Burton said a campaign adviser discussed the sale with Wondisford by phone and followed up with an e-mail to Wondisford repeating his points. Wondisford responded: ``I confirm that the three points below are accurate,'' according to the e-mail, provided to Bloomberg News and authenticated through records shown by the adviser.

The e-mail says that the sellers ``did not offer or give the Obamas a `discount' on the house price on the basis of or in relation to the price offered and accepted on the lot.'' It also says that ``in the course of the negotiation over the sales price,'' Obama and his wife, Michelle, ``made several offers until the one accepted at $1.65 million, and that this was the best offer you received on the house.''

Wondisford has declined to talk directly about the matter.

Three Bids

The Obamas submitted three bids: $1.3 million on Jan. 15, 2005; $1.5 million on Jan. 21; and $1.65 million on Jan. 23, according to a copy of the sale contract shown to Bloomberg News. Obama received more than $1.2 million in book royalties and a book advance in 2005, the year he was sworn in to the U.S. Senate, his financial disclosure statement shows.

The e-mail between Wondisford and the campaign adviser also says that the sellers had ``stipulated that the closing dates for the two properties were to be the same.'' In January 2006, Rita Rezko sold the Obamas one-sixth of the lot, for $104,500, to expand their yard. She later sold the rest of the land to Michael Sreenan, who said by e-mail yesterday that he bought it in late December 2006 for $575,000.

To contact the reporter on this story: Timothy J. Burger in Washington at Tburger2@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: February 18, 2008 15:04 EST

  Email this article  Printer friendly format
 
 
I find it simply amazing that the Obama worshipers can only post on here that his 17 year relationship with a dirty crooked businessman is Hillary's fault, or they try to deflect it with some 1993 garbage that Hillary has been vetted for a hundred times over. St. Obama is going down kids, I need to buy more stock in prozac right away...lol
don't forget Hillary and Bill have been involved with secretive scams for a long time, and are PROFESSIONALS.   BILL AND HILLARY HAVE ACCEPTED MONEY AND JET TRAVEL FROM ASIANS, CANADIANS, FOR who knows what, but billions and billions of money is involved, and much of it earmarked for Hillary's run and Bill's Library, and their family vacations. I hope Obama is not involved.   Thank God for McCain!!
I don't care what anyone says - Obama is GREAT! My family and friends are voting for him tomorrow! I can't stand to hear Hillary talk its like listening to my Mother - I tun her out! And I would never pick her to represent women of America - she sat back knowing her husband was cheating only to advance her career!
I was going to vote for obama, in the last couple days, I have changed my mind. I do not know enought about him, but what I have heard the last couple days is pretty scary. I don't think he has a clue.
What a bunch of silly fools you Obamaites are.  The press asks a couple of legitimate questions about matters that should have been aired months ago, and you complain that this is somehow something improper being done by Sen. Clinton.  Of course, you must be right.  Obviously Saint Barack can do no wrong.
There is nothing to the NAFTA Canda story you morons. The meeting was not an official meeting and nothing happened that contradicted what he has said publicly. Hillary is over playing this and the media thinks it has a story. The Rezko thing has been played out to death. There is nothing there as he has been forthright about everything. For all you Clinton people how many scandals do they have in their closet? Where are those tax returns? Clinton is eating her own and killing this party. Put an end to this divisive bs...
Great, so now Clinton whines about the media and bullies them to review her distorted characterizations of him meanwhile her scandalous past gets swept under the rug... She is a totally self-absorbed politician committed solely to her own goals willing to do anything to win including ripping apart the Democratic party, fear-mongering, and flip-flopping on every issue she can.

She is a joke and if people vote for her they deserve the self-serving president that they'll get.  Does anyone remember the way Bill was in the White House?  He rode the internet bubble to solid approval numbers allowing him to take his philandering to the ultimate level.  Now, Hillary's made a deal with the devil to help her get the president so she can be Lady Macbeth.

Please don't vote for Hillary.  It will be a depressing time with her as leader as the same kind of polarization that has existed the last 15 years will be even more pronounced.

We need transformation, not a fighter who will inspire  the opposition to dig in their heels and fight back just as hard....
What about Peter Paul and Hillary?  The press has seemed to completely ignore all Hillary's past (go to YouTube and watch "Hillary Clinton Scandal 1/2").  I think this is pretty ridiculous.  The Clinton machine doing its best steamroller impression.
Congratulations Aswini and Domenico,

we are now getting reporting of the facts.

Obama supporters can deny all they want, Hillary Clinton did not start the REZKO TRIAL, she did not release the memo between Obama camp and Canada Official in Chicago----- so you can stop saying she is attacking Obama.   OBAMA SAYS HE MAD A BONE-HEADED DECISION ABOUT REAL ESTATE DEAL WITH REZKO.
AND THIS CANDIDATE IS ATTACKING HILLARY CLINTON ON USING GOOD JUDGMENT.  GIVE US A BREAK.  IF THE MEDIA COVER-UP OF OBAMA HAS NOW BEEN BROKEN, HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD STAY IN THE RACE UNTIL THE END.
THE REPUBLICANS HAVE HAD ALL OF THIS INFORMATION FROM DAY ONE AND HAVE ALREADY STARTED USING IT ON FOX.  DO YOU PEOPLE THINK THAT KARL ROVE WOULD NOT BE OUT THERE DOING HIS THING IN THIS ELECTION.  BUSH AND COMPANY ARE STILL HATING THAT BUSH SR. GOT BEATEN BY CLINTON.   THIS IS A NEW DAY....DO WE WANT A PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE WHO HAS NOT FULLY DISCLOSED EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM THAT COULD BE USED AGAINST HIM IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.  HE HAS NO RESPECT FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IF HE NOW THINKS THAT THE LATEST REVELATIONS WON'T GO AGAINST HIM IN THE FALL.

OBAMA WALKS OUT ON THE PRESS PEOPLE, "COME ON GUYS, I ANSWERED LIKE 8 QUSTIONS.  WE'RE RUNNING LATE."

HELLO, OBAMA -- WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH YOU GET OUT??   AND YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE READY FOR THE PRESIDENCY.

OBAMA, WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU.  THIS IS A CREDIBILITY ISSUE.  THIS IS A JUDGEMENT ISSUE.  AND YOU HAVE A PROBLEM.  

TO OBAMA SUPPORTERS --  FACTS ARE FACTS.  OBAMA'S OWN WORDS HIS LAND DEAL "WAS A BONE-HEADED MOVE".

AND FOR OBAMA SUPPORTERS --  SEN. JAY ROCKERFELLER READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT ON IRAQ. HE IS NOW ENDORSING OBAMA.  FACT; SEN. ROCKERFELLER VOTED YES,
THE SAME AS HILLARY CLINTON.  OBAMA MADE THE STATEMENT IN THE PAST THAT HAD HE HAD THE INTELLEGENCE HE IS NOT SURE HOW HE WOULD HAVE VOTED.
THE LOGIC IS FLAWED HERE.  OBAMA WAS NOT IN THE SENATE.  ROCKERFELLER IS ON THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, HE COULD HAVE GIVEN SOME OF THE BRIEFINGS THAT SEN. CLINTON SAID SHE HAD RECEIVED BEFORE VOTING.   THEY VOTED THE SAME.  SEN. CLINTON WAS A JUNIOR SENATOR FROM NEW YORK, THE CITY WHERE THE TWIN TOWERS WENT DOWN.  DO YOU THINK THAT SHE WOULD UNDERSTANDABLY WANT TO GO AFTER GETTING INSPECTORS IN TO IRAQ TO SEE IF THEY HAD THE NUKES THAT COLIN POWELL AND CONDI RICE STATED WERE THERE.  SHE VOTED WITH THE WARNING TO BUSH THAT SHE DID NOT APPROVE OF PRE-EMPTIVE ATTACKS.  THAT SHE TRUSTED HIM TO GET THE INSPECTORS BACK INTO IRAQ AND MILITARY ACTION WAS A VERY LAST RESORT.  READ HER SPEECH DELIVERED TO THE SENATE AND LETTER TO BUSH.  

OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE A LEG TO STAND ON IN THIS ISSUE.
HALF OF AMERICA VOICED THEIR OBJECTIONS TO WAR IN IRAQ.  SO WHY DIDN'T HE MARCH ON WASHINGTON AND DEMAND THAT BUSH NOT GO TO WAR.  IF HE FELT SO PASSIONATELY ABOUT IT HE COULD HAVE STARTED A MOVEMENT AND DEMANDED BUSH BE REMOVED FOR EVEN ENTERTAINING THE IDEA OF WAR IN IRAQ.  HE GAVE A SPEECH AND THEN WAS A NO SHOW.  

BUT LET'S JUST KEEP ATTACKING CLINTON.  OBAMA IS A CRY BABY AND BLAMES THESE ATTACKS ON CLINTON.  EVEN THAT IS BONE-HEADED AS THE FACTS PROVE CLINTON HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.  SHE IS JUST DEMANDING THAT THE MEDIA REPORT WHAT IS FINALLY COMING TO LIGHT ABOUT OBAMA AND WHAT HAS PURPOSELY BEEN WITH HELD FROM THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES.  

NOW THE CNN PEOPLE ARE SAYING...OH WELL THE REZKO TRIAL WILL TAKES THREE MONTHS.  OKAY THEN, HANG IN THERE HILLARY, WE WILL STICK WITH YOU EVEN AFTER JUNE.

OBAMA SUPPORTERS, JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS.


AND ON THE FIGHT TO DALLAS, HE WOULD NOT TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.  WOW GUESS HE IS OUT OF WORDS...QUICK GET THE SPEECH WRITER BUSY.  SPEND MORE ON ATTACK ADS.
I'VE GOT TWICE AS MUCH MONEY, USE IT. SPIN, SPIN, SPIN,

AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS.
I am in a quoting mood today-- another Mark Twain moment, from Tom Sawyer--

"The only difference between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives."

Before I categorically rip into this recreated non-story fabrication, let me remind everyone -- Senator Obama IS running a different kind of campaign.  He IS practicing what he preaches and not rolling around in the mud.  How do I know this?  Senator Obama has not once responded to this nonsense by pointing out the numerous scandals both old (see real estate deals, cattle futures) and new and unvetted by the Republican attack machine (Norman Hsu, New York City which showed "0" votes for Senator Obama on election night in 80 precincts, but the subsequent audit showed that in every one of those precincts Senator Obama received significant numbers of the votes cast, President Bill Clinton's questionable relationships with dictators and people who steal from the elderly, otherwise known as InfoUSA, with which he could throw more mud at Senator Clinton than she could every throw his way.  I don't know if Senator Clinton (or her husband) are guilty of anything, what I do know is that Senator Clinton isn't making this campaign about their past, present and potential future scandals.  What a difference a candidate makes!  

On the fabrication, there was a great story about this in the Los Angeles Times.  If you read this, you will find as I did that there is nothing to find.  The Los Angeles Times wrote an indepth piece on this and then endorsed Senator Obama for Democratic Presidential nominee.  This repeated Rezko story is bull.  
Who let the dogs out? This is great. This crooked empty suit will off the stage soon enough. Then we can sit back and re-visit the Clinton years.
Will anyone tell us where OBAMA and HILLARY have
contributed their illegal monies. i.e. What Charities
did OBAMA GIVE THE ILLEGAL MONEY TO..?
What charity did HILLARY GIVE HER ILLEGAL MONEY TO..?

The reason I ask is this is one of the best ways to
launder illegal money.  i.e. OBAMA could give it to
his pastor and in turn that man could give it to those that will use it for the campaign of OBAMA.

The same holds true for Hillary.  When Hillary had the monies of Mr. Hsu I tried to find out who got
this charity pot of gold....I was told that it was
not for public knowledge.
SHAME ON YOU MSNBC AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA for not showing some backbone in this! Why won't U call Clinton out her shady tactics? U are happy to report on Rezko, but those of us that U haven't been fooled yet know for sure that Obama is clean with all this Rezko thing. Why don't U try Norman Hsu and those other shady folks Clinton's been dealing all these years?
If U keep going with this garbage, I'm checking out of Ur network for good!!!!
I feel sorry to see that Republicans have none viable candidate other than McCain who only can think about war all the times. I do not see he has any agendas to improve our ailing economy or fix our failing healthcare system.
Today he was defending NAFTA by saying that if we re-negotiate with other countries like Canada for NAFTA that might make them angry and will loose their support for Iraq war.
I do not understand the republicans and their so called leader Dear McCain who cares more for a dumb war than loosing our trade to other countries.
I don't know if American people understand the stakes we are facing at this pivotal moment when we are facing enormous anxieties over our lives; they really think a war monger like McCain can lift our nation.
Promoting Bush's failed Foreign policy, thirst for more wars and pledged for staying in Iraq for another 100 years at the expense of 12 billion dollars a month is not the solutions we can ask for.
HEY YOU HILLARY LOVERS!!! LISTEN TO THE SONG I AM ABOUT TO PLAY, OH RATHER POEM I AM ABOUT TO WRITE:  Hillary Clinton is crying, crying crying, throwing everything she has from wardrobe to kitchen sink but hey when all these mudlsinging anf fighting ends, only one man, NOT woman will be crowned as the NOMINEE and I am pretty happy and satisfied with the result that will show Barack Obama beating Hillarious, Hilliar Clinton.  Doesn't matter if she still hides her tax returns. Whats important is Americans knew more than being lied to.  OBAMA 2008!
Do not worry---the obamanoids will not desert him.The media is trying to clean up their drooling faces because they have been exposed.Hey Obama said --gee guys I answered 8 questions  goodby.Now leave me the hell alone I am busy campaigning.Saw him several times today and he was slandering clinton---guess he just has to have the power that any politician strives to get.
I am a Republican voting for Obama and was actually thinking ok this democratic party may not be so bad, but seeing how Clinton is acting and how the liberal media is feeding into her lies...repeating again and again that there is no evidence but we're reporting lies anyhow...If Clinton gets the nomination that the Democrats have lost me and thousands and thousand like me, all the young voters brought out by Obama will go republican, so if the Democrats want to shoot themselves in the foot and back Clinton...go ahead, you'll build the Republican party and make it stronger.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=726268

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google