ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Junior Super Tuesday

Posted: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 8:58 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

John Harwood of CNBC and the New York Times offers of a primer of what to watch for tonight. “Should Mr. Obama sweep all four contests, her hopes will plainly be extinguished. Should she carry Ohio and Texas — as her husband, former President Bill Clinton, said she must to retain a shot at the nomination — she will no doubt fight on to the next big battle, on April 22 in Pennsylvania, and, perhaps, all the way to the convention in Denver. Trickier to handicap would be a split decision, in which Mrs. Clinton won Ohio, for example, but lost Texas. For people who want to think about possible permutations, keep this one in mind. Because of the way Texas allocates delegates, it is entirely possible that Mrs. Clinton could win the popular vote there but lose to Mr. Obama on delegates.”

The Politico’s Roger Simon: “The stage has been set for a Hillary Clinton comeback on Tuesday. Nobody knows if she has the votes to do it, but the opportunity is ripe. She not only is vigorously attacking Barack Obama but simultaneously portraying herself as a victim. It is a nifty political two-step.” He adds: “Nor do I think, as some do, that Bill Clinton’s statement that she needs to win both Texas and Ohio to gain the nomination was (yet another) grievous tactical error. The Clinton campaign had to serve notice that Tuesday is it. The campaign is facing elimination after 11 Obama victories in a row and with superdelegates swinging his way. Both Clintons had to motivate voters in Texas and Ohio by serving final notice. They had to tell them: Get up off the couch and vote now, or it’s all over.”

NBC political analyst Charlie Cook writes in his CongressDaily column, “[W]inning by slight percentages in Texas and Ohio aren’t real wins for Clinton. A ‘win’ would be anything that significantly closes the gap in delegates. Symbolic victories mean nothing at this point, other than encouraging her to plow ahead in this campaign, amassing a greater campaign debt than already exists and delaying her ability to get on with the next phase of her life.”

Democrats don’t necessarily seem to want the Clinton-Obama race to end. From a new Washington Post/ABC poll: “Democrats by more than a 2-1 margin say Hillary Clinton should stay in the presidential race even if she loses either the Texas or Ohio primary today. But if she fails in both, fewer than half say they’d want her to fight on. Many, in that case, have another idea for Clinton: the vice presidency.”

The New York Daily News’ DeFrank about sums it up: “If Hillary Clinton wins Texas and Ohio Tuesday, she's back from the political boneyard. If she loses both, she's finished. And if it's a split decision, anything is possible.” 
 
But, as Reuters notes, “Even a split decision in the two states would leave her with a steep climb to overtake Obama's lead of roughly 150 pledged convention delegates who select the nominee, and increase the pressure on her to quit.”

The cover of the New York Daily News: “Win or it’s adios!” “Hillary faces do-or-die primary battles today in Texas and Ohio.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Doesn't Hillary have to win Ohio and Texas with 60% plus to have ANY hope of catching up with Obama in Pledged Delegates?? Should that not be the "bar" tonight in everyone's analysis? Does anyone think that the Superdelegates will go over to Hillary in droves if she is BEHIND in PLEDGED DELEGATES, POPULAR VOTE, and NUMBER of STATES WON??? What would that do to the party? Obama and Hillary will have no trouble winning states like NY, NJ, and MA over McCain. The key states will be Missouri, Virginia, etc. that will take cross-over GOP votes and Independents in addition to the Democratic base. Obama has shown in state after state that he can win these voters. So unless Hillary wins really big victories tonight will there be a realistic scenario whereby she could win more Pledged Delegates? This is not early in the season when she won NH. There really are not that many contests left. And if she HAS to win EACH by over 60%, is that really plausible? Will she win in my state of North Carolina by 60% plus of the vote? Unlikely. Oregon? Mississippi? Pennsylvania? All over 60% of the vote?? Very unlikely. So why go on?? Doesn't she risk becoming a "spoiler" - just helping McCain solidify his campaign? Of course, if she wins with over 60% tonight, then all bets are off. But if she just ekes out small wins - and actually LOSES in the overall DELEGATE fight - then what is her justification for continuing? And, how about releasing those tax returns NOW? What is she hiding??
Susan, Raleigh, NC (Sent Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:42 AM)
Good call Susan but the Press has bent over backward for her.
Can you imagine any other candidate, Obama for instance, that could have lost 11 in a row, be behind in delegates  and still get the benefit of a doubt that she did? I don't think it is any more than the Press and many Politjunkies wanting this to go to the convention for the spectacle of it. Unfortunately in a spectacle such as this the Democrats will be the Christians and the Republicans will be the lions and Limbaugh and his ditto heads will be laying on their sides eating grapes and laughing.
Time for Spartacus to wipe the stupid grin from their faces.

Obama! Today and in November and on Inauguration day.
Any support that I may have had  for Hillary Clinton went out the window the moment she decided to dip into the bag of scare tactics usually employed by the Republican Party.  Her 3 am call commercial is appalling. All we need now from her, is a threat barometer at the corner of our screens telling us how voting for Obama equates to terrorism at home.  She is sacrificing the party’s chances for personal ambitions. Shame on YOU Hillary Clinton. You will not scare a vote out of us. And really what would you do if that call did come, other than roll over and say, “Hey Bill, what should I do?” I am myself picking up the phone right now and calling my friends across the county to encourage them to vote for Obama and a cleaner race, a better democratic party.
Why are white men on both sides of the isle afraid of Senator Clinton?
I commend the comments of "CitizenJ" below.  Self indulgence could truely kill the democrats from winning the election...
The best case for dems would be Hillary Pres. Obama VP. We dont need the white House for 4 yrs. we need at least 12 to clean up the maga disaster created by Daddy,s Cheerleader.
Serxism is alive and well in America.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=727456

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google