ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Hillary questions Obama's security creds

Posted: Thursday, March 06, 2008 5:47 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: , , ,

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones and Aswini Anburajan
WASHINGTON, DC -- Hillary Clinton today suggested Barack Obama had not met the commander-in-chief test.

She said that proving he was ready would be important with John McCain as the Republican nominee and with national security as a key issue in the election.
 
"I think it's imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander-in-chief threshold, and I believe that I've done that. Certainly, Sen. McCain has done that, and you'll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy," she said during a meeting with military officers and other national security experts in Washington, which was convened to discuss her own readiness for the job and her plans for dealing with the war in Afghanistan.

The New York senator began the meeting by talking about the support she had received from military officers. "As president, I will draw on the experience of leaders such as those you see before you to confront our challenges and to seize our opportunities to build a safer and more just world," she said, adding that she was grateful to have her own experience to draw on having lived at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue and having traveled to more than 80 countries representing the country.

She mentioned having had a conversation today with King Abdullah of Jordan to discuss challenges facing the region. "Some may believe that experience doesn't matter or that even in today's world it is a liability. But as generals and admirals, ambassadors, and other senior leaders charged with protecting our security know, experience doesn't just count for something. Often when lives are on the line and a decision must be made, experience counts for everything. In this election, we need a nominee who can pass the commander-in-chief test," she said.

But in a conference call with reporters today, Obama foreign affairs adviser Susan Rice questioned Clinton's own experience. "You don't get that experience from being married to a commander in chief," she said.

Rice and Greg Craig, another Obama adviser, repeated a constant theme of the Obama campaign that Clinton's initial vote for the war in Iraq made her judgment on foreign policy poorer than Obama's. Rice also tried to walk a fine line by trying to discredit any substantive work that Clinton had done as First Lady, while trying not to undermine the role.

She praised the work of Laura Bush and Clinton as goodwill ambassadors who did "laudable work" on specific issues in the international arena, but she said that the U.S. government does not turn to the First Lady in a time of crisis. She also claimed that Clinton's claims that she had played roles in the conflict in Bosnia, Macedonia, and Northern Ireland were overstated.

"She took a trip to Bosnia with Chelsea, Sinbad and Sheryl Crow. She claimed that bullets were flying in the air, but she was at a meet and greet and concert for the troops," Rice claimed.

The Clinton campaign has been pushing the national security theme hard for days, beginning with their release of the "Children" ad -- with a ringing phone and a question about who voters want answering the phone at 3:00 am in the event of a crisis. 

During the brief Q&A at her meeting, Clinton was asked about her role when her husband answered phone calls during crises in the middle of the night.

"I don't talk about the conversations that I had with my husband in the White House, but obviously I was there for a lot of phone calls at different times of the day and night, and I have a very clear idea of what it takes to be prepared and ready to not only to answer the phone but then to make the decisions that are required depending on what the crisis is."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Puh-leaze.
Clinton: just take my word for it. I'm experienced. If you question that, then you are Ken Starr.

Paper tiger
Ok, here it goes.  Here we have Two Democrats, Hillary and Obama, competing against each other.  Democrats, yes democrats, who I noticed have a tendency to vote for-- guess which party--that is right—Democrats. Now, stay with my reasoning here; I will not go too fast for you, ok. Since the “Democrats” are voting for “Democratic Presidential Nominees” is it just possible, even plausible, and down right probable, that the “Democrats” will vote for a “DEMOCRAT” during the general election! Furthermore, and I will try not to get too complex here, since the “Democrats” have been turning out in record numbers to vote or Hillary or Obama (both of which are: democrats,) isn’t it probable that they will vote for a “DEMOCRATIC” candidate!  Now comes the “tricky part.”  Doesn’t this simply, and I mean very simple, basic logic suggest that Hillary’s argument that she can win the “Big Blue States” against another “DEMOCRAT” become meaningless?  And finally, since Barrack Obama seems to be able to draw in independents better than Hillary, wouldn't he be (and I’m just spit balling here) A MORE ELECT ABLE  PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE—since he is leading in the popular vote and in pledged delegates that represent the will of the American People.  Oh, rest assure, we Democrats will prevail because somewhere, I once read, yes,  that’s’ it---A government for the people—by the people---Yes, yes They must have been talking about the “Super Delegates.”   Not.
What is Hillary's deal with puffing up John McCain.  The favorable remarks she gives towards him make one believe she's running ON HIS TICKET!  

She probably has realized the reality of the situation.  It's will be very very tough to win enough pledged delegates so she wants to tank the party and endorse McCain.  

Anything good about the Clinton legacy went downt he tubes with these primaries in my view.  
Wait, I thought she wanted to keep it positive....?? Oh she wants BARACK to keep it positive. Yea OK Hillary, special rules for girls.
So Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, and Laura Bush also have the experience to be commander-in-chief? Hillary's claim that she has the experience to answer that red phone at 3am is laughable. She is exaggerating her foreign policy credentials. She'll say and do anything to win.
Why didn't any reporters ask what exactly is the "commander-in-chief threshold"?

What do you guys and gals do all day long besides transcribe stories from the AP newswire to your own website?

All I know about Clinton's remarks, though, is that, her overseas trips with Sheryl Crow and Sinbad do not push somebody over any "commander in chief" threshold I could ever imagine.  What IS necessary, however, is the judgment to make the right decisions the first time.  Clinton has a history of failing the first time, from the bar exams to health care to Iraq.  She refuses to acknowledge what went wrong when she failed, only that she was "duped" and "tricked" by the Republicans...
Hillary, you are the wife of a former president and for that we are supposed to believe you have vast commander-in-chief experience? You aren't any more qualified for the job than my wife is.
It does not surprise me that Sen. Clinton can pass a test she made up, and won't share with others.
CLINTONS TIED TO REZKO

Since the name of Chicago defendant Antoin ‘Tony’ Rezko has come up in national debate, it seems fair to look at donations from other defendants in Chicago’s “Operation Board Games.”

Of the other five defendants, three have donated to the Clintons or to Clinton supporters, three have donated mostly to Republicans, and at least two have donated to Obama’s political opponents. None have donated to Obama...
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/clintons-tied-to-rezko.php
Well, I'm a doctor, and I take a lot of calls at night.  My husband doesn't really feel qualified to give advice to women in labour or deliver babies just because he's been next to me at 3AM when I answer the phone!
What a joke.  Voting to authorize a war without reading the intelligence on it.... shows poor judgment.  This is not who I want to be commander in chief.
Senator Clinton will lose a national security argument against Senator McCain.  She should think of a different argument.

Senator Obama will beat Senator McCain on national security because he showed the judgment to be against the debacle in Iraq, he showed the judgment to seek strikes against Al Quaeda in Pakistan (something the Bush administration is finally doing) and he shows the judgment that negotiation is not a reward for good behavior, rather it is what we do to stop bad behavior.

Senator Obama is the right candidate, at the right moment with the right judgment to be the 44th President of these United States of America.
"I think it's imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander-in-chief threshold, and I believe that I've done that. Certainly, Sen. McCain has done that
_________________________________________________

And exactly how have you done that Hillary?  You continue to raise McCain, the republican nominee in case you did not know, up on a pedastal, while simutaneously lowering a person you claim to be honored by and is also a fellow democrat.  Whether you know it or not, in that statement you actually raised McCain above yourself in your desperate attempt to belittle Obama. You have no sense of loyalty, shame, humility, care, concern, or sense of fairness! Hillary you care about no one but yourself.  I am ashamed that you are representing American women.  

... Her(HRC) ad says:
As chairman of the oversight committee charged with the force of fighting al Qaeda in Afghanistan, he was too busy running for President to hold even one hearing.

That's a lie.  Not one of these subcommittees is "charged with the force of fighting al Qaeda in Afghanistan" (Hillary seems to have the Senate confused with the Army) but the one with the most direct jurisdiction would be the Subcommittee on Near East and South and Central Asian Affairs, which is chaired by John Kerry.  Obama is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs.  

Furthermore, Obama's subcommittee didn't meet frequently before he the chair, either.  I can't find a record of their meetings online anywhere, but I vaguely remember hearing on the news when this "story" first broke months ago that the subcommittee had often gone years without meeting.  If anyone can find that story, I'd love to put up a source.  The subcommittee didn't meet much because most important issues relating to NATO have been handled by the full Foreign Relations Committee.  Obama has been an active participant in the full committee.

by Troutnut(dkos)
--
Clinton Says Obama Was MIA on Afghanistan. But Was She, Too?

excerpt:  ... But the full foreign relations committee, under the guidance of Senator Joe Biden, has held several hearings on Afghanistan that covered NATO's role there. It's not as if the foreign relations committee did nothing on Afghanistan because Obama did not take on the mission. Also, as happens with many committees, the chair of the full committee reserves the right to handle the big issues him- or herself, and Afghanistan counts as a big issue.

FULL ARTICLE:  http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/03/7442_clinton_says_ob.html
No doubt you get exoperience within proximity. Saying you don't get first hand experience of being a president if your husband was President and you were the First Lady is rediculous. Of course you do. she isn't saying I have had experience being president but just that she is experienced in what it takes to be a president. She is a life long politician and political activist.

I am  profess neither party but when the democrats put goofey John Kerry up aginst Bush, it was a joke. Kerry was/is a joke. Why not put the stronger and less pliable candidate against the Republicans? Doesn't obama resemble Kerry? Wafey. Goofey. Not firm/rigid. I sincerely don't see him as a politician, therefore, I certainly can't visualize him as president.
Sounding like a war-monger is probably not a way to get Democratic votes. Her belligerant commander in chief talk gives me a cold chill. I fear that she will want to prove she is tough with military adventures to compensate for the perception of women.

"I think it's imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander-in-chief threshold"  Is that what her Iraqi invasion vote was all about? So she could demonstrate she could cross the threshhold? Is that why all those people died so she could fill her resume to run for president?

I am so tired of George Bush wannabees.

Real military commanders will tell you that they don't want war and are man enough to admit it. Resorting to war is an admission of failure.
I'm honestly not sure I'm comfortable with candidates having discussions with foreign leaders now on there own.  It just doesn't seem right to me.

One of the things that bothers me most about the Clinton campaign is how self-aggrandizing they are, and how they expect everything that HRC as taken as THE TRUTH with no questions asked.

She convened this meeting to talk about her qualifications.  Uh OK.  But a meeting where people talk (as was described) doesn't seem to prove much of anything.

I honestly don't think any of the candidates in this race have been "vetted" as foreign policy experts or as having the "right stuff" in terms of security credentials.  But if I have to choose between Clinton and McCain on the issue of security credentials, I hate to break it to Hillary but I'll choose McCain any day of the week.  I think its a HUGE mistake for her and her campaign to make this a dominant issue of her campaign.

Obama, at least, can draw distinctions between him and McCain.  Hillary just is a weaker clone of McCain (more like Bush) when it comes to national security.  Who needs that?  Not us.

Obama 08

(and thanks for the kind words Ian)
A brief survey of the leaders Clinton dealt with reveals that while important for the history books, their current status hardly makes them relevant to a possible Hillary Clinton administration:

Russian President Boris Yeltsin - dead
Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto - assassinated
John Hume, leader of Northern Ireland Social Democratic and Labor Party and co-signer of the Good Friday peace agreement - retired.
David Trimble, head of Ulster Unionist Party and First Minister of Northern Ireland (co-signer of Good Froday agreement) - obscure member of British Conservative Party.
Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman - retired.
Turkish Prime Minister Tansu Ciller - retired.
Jordanian King Hussein - dead.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair - resigned.
South African President Nelson Mandela - retired.
Chinese President Jiang Zemin - retired.
Philippine President Fidel Ramos - retired, former member of Carlyle Group International Advisory Board.
Indian Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao - dead.
Moroccan King Hassan - dead.
Bosnian President Alija Izetbegovic - dead.
German Chancellor Helmut Kohl - retired, enmeshed in scandal.
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin - assassinated.
Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat - dead.
Saudi King Fahd - dead.
Indonesian President Suharto - dead.
French President Jacques Chirac - retired.
Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo - retired, serves on international advisory board of Coca Cola Company.
Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso - retired.
Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien - retired.
Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating - retired.
Japanese Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto - dead.
Argentine President Carlos Menem - retired, under investigation for fraud.

Senator Clinton has quite an array of world leaders in her scrap book. Unfortunately, they are only relevant to her if she is writing a history book, testifying on their behalf in a criminal trial, or conducting a seance. As far as calling at 3 am world leaders listed in Clinton’s Rolodex, only people like Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern may be of assistance since he is one of the very few world leaders who was in power when Hillary was First Lady.

----posted by Alexa at http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=814
Did she get in the Dukakis tank?

This woman and her campaing are shams.
Here are some Real Tough Questions you should get ready for Senator Clinton

• What type of Foreign Policy Experience has Senator Clinton had
• While President Clinton was in the White House was Hillary Clinton giving security clearance to read any national intelligent information in case a crisis came up
• What Foreign Leaders has she met with and what were the bases of the meetings.
• Why didn’t Senator Clinton read NIE Report before she voted to go to war?
• Do you think if Chelsea were in the military, she would have exercised more precaution before agreeing with President Bush War Strategy
• Why did it take Senator Clinton until now to regret her vote?
• What makes her a more qualified woman to be President over someone like Barbara Boxer who actually had the courage to vote against the War
• Why is your campaign taking money from a Firm being accused of  Serial Sexual Harassment?
• Has one of Senator Clintons campaign chairman also taken money from Tony Rezko and if so
• Has Senator Clintons campaign chairman given the money back or donated to charity
• Don’t you think Courage is more important than being Politically Safe?
We need Hillary in office so we don't have to be afraid of our own shadows. Do you not see the damage she is doing to the Democratic "brand" with the path she's now choosing to continue down. Its like she's saying, "It's mine! If I can't have it no one can"
Remember two women in the Bible each claiming to be the mother of that baby, the fake was willing see the baby (Democratic Party) cut in two. Hillary is out of control.
I doubt that Mrs. Clinton was in the bedroom with Bill when the 3am calls came in...

I think Monica has a better argument of knowing most of the details on the calls since Bill was MIA from Hillary and had transferred all calls to the Lincoln bedroom.
Hillary spent the vast majority of her legal career in Little Rock working for an all-white coporate law firm representing big busines and corporations.  To this day, the Rose Law Firm has no non-white lawyers.  Just check out the firm's web site!  While she took a job out of law school with the Childrens Legal defense Fund, she stayed less than a year to sell out and become a corporate lawyer and a woman who spent most of her time fighting for the interests of Walmart.  Whats so great about that experience?
Alexa

Since most of the presidents/leaders she had tea with have either retired or are dead, she too should consider retiring and keep her senate seat. This election is about the future not the past. Since she is not going to accept that advice, why not ask those leaders that are still alive to write letters of endorsement emphasizing the experience she gained.
SO YOU ARE CRYING THAT HILLARY IS SAYING IT'S MINE.
OBAMA IS SAYING IT'S MINE.  LOOKS LIKE A CONTEST.
GEE I THOUGHT THAT WAS WHAT THIS ELECTION IS SUPPOSE TO BE, OR WERE WE JUST WATCHING A ROCK STAR BEING CROWNED PRINCE OF AMERICA, ELECTION OVER?  REMINDS US OF KING BUSH'S ELECTION.  REALLY, LET'S HOPE REALLY HARD THAT WE DON'T HAVE THOSE HANGING CHADS AGAIN.
MSNBC, YOU LEFT SOMETHING OUT;

  SUSAN RICE SAID THAT NEITHER CLINTON NOR OBAMA HAD THE EXPERIENCE TO ANSWER THE 3 CALL.

   DAN ABRAMS (MSNBC) HAD THAT CLIP OF SUSAN RICE ON HIS SHOW AND RATED IT A "BLUNDER"....SHE ADMITS THAT OBAMA DOESN'T HAVE EXPERIENCE, IN HER ATTEMPT TO ATTACK HILLARY CLINTON.  WOW, NOT SURE I'D WANT HER ADVISING ME ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR ANY AFFAIRS.

 (Bet you don't post this one either)

AGAIN, THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS RIP HILLARY, THEY MUST BE ABLE TO COME UP WITH SOME POSITIVES TO TELL US ABOUT OBAMA.  PLEASE SOMETHING.  OH, THE ONE THAT HE DOESN'T PLAY THE POLITICS OF DISTRUCTION, RIGHT?
HE'S LEAVING THAT UP TO YOU.
I think Hillary has realized she can't win elected delegates and is hedging her bets for 2012 and is now trying to sabotage the democrats.  How else do you explain her McCain comment.  Are you kidding me?  She actually thinks McCain is more worthy of being president than Obama from her own party? She is not a team player and I hope all democrats realize how disgusting her comments were.  I mean did she make a deal with McCain to sabotage Obama and the dems?  No wonder Rush Limbaugh wants her to win!
You know Senator Clinton... you are starting to look pathetic.  In fact Larry David wrote an article about the red phone...it includes a montage of the 'many faces of Hillary' which you've earned Hillary 'I don't want to attack any of my fellow candidates' she said back in Iowa to later becoming the 'media victim' that 'throws the kitchen sink' at her opponent.  But in truth she fights like a girl...she can dish it out but if a question gets directed her way it's 'don't be mean to lil ol me'.   The article suggests that we may not want someone so unstable to answer any phone at any time in the white house.  It also points out that Obama is stable and more moderate when he's winning and when he's losing.  Senator Clinton you have been all over the place... your credibility is splintering.  It was someone from your campaign talking to someone in Canada about NAFTA.  Right now you look like the 'same old, same old washington politician that is willing to DO ANYTHING to win and it's really sad because you are the first woman to make it so far... You are not representing us well Hillary.  I think you should try to hold on to your senate seat.  I don't think you're 'ready'.
Mcain/Clinton 08! Cause thats the way she sounds.  
why are you press still wasting your time on hillary, why can't we focus on how Obama will bring mc cain down from their Bushmc cain avenue?
She is a camelion
Why are all the major news outlets IGNORING the fact that Hillary was behind NAFTAgate as was reported yesterday on First Read? Obama was taken to task when it was thought to be his campaign! Obama is going to loose this race because the media has decided they want it to go to the convention. What a shape the media rules American politics by coloring the news to fit their grand plan. SHAME
I can't tell if this comment was made by the Republican Chicken Hawk and Neo-Con Condi Rice , or by the security advisor to our new and improved "O-bam-a! Uniter-not-Divider" Susan Rice:

"She took a trip to Bosnia with Chelsea, Sinbad and Sheryl Crow. She claimed that bullets were flying in the air, but she was at a meet and greet and concert for the troops," Rice claimed.

Like Bush, Obama is turning out to be a miserable failure as a uniter.
Mrs. Clinton forcefully denied the allegations on January 27, 1998, one day after the President's public denial. She admitted that the American people "should certainly be concerned" if a President had an affair and lied to cover it up. She acknowledged that it would be a "very serious offense." But she emphasized that the allegations were false -- a "pretty bad" smear. She noted that the President "has denied these allegations on all counts, unequivocally." And Mrs. Clinton shifted the focus away from the President, indicated that "this is a battle" and stated that "some folks are going to have a lot to answer for" when the facts come out.(461)

Hillary is continuing to prove time and time again she will say and do anything to get elected

Being the wife of a former President doesn't automatically qualify you to be commander-in-chief, or we might as well convince Laura Bush to run against McCain for the Republicans. Obama has had more experience in elective office than Hillary, only the brainwashed Hillary zealots would claim so otherwise. Obama is just going to keep on showing that he is the better man by getting more and more on the offensive but still staying positive, repeatedly demanding Hillary release her tax returns is definitely one way to respond to Hillary's kitchen sink Rovian campaign.
Keep it up, HRC.  I am hoping to go to Missouri for the summer and campaign for Obama.  With this attitude, should you become the nominee, I will campaign for McCain - as he is the best person to answer the red phone at 3am.
I have always loved the Clinton's, but frankly Hillary's claim to have 35 years experience befuddles me. When does visiting the taj mahal and all the other stuff she did during her husband's 8 years in office count as experience.It is judgement that counts. Obama was right on the war. Obama was right on pakistan (the bush admin. is doing exactly what he suggested) obama was right on talking to your enemies (We find out the bush admin. is secretly talking to Hamas). Hillary's judgement on the war was wrong. on her first approach to healthcare and all the secrecy was wrong. When has she made a good judgement on any issue of National security?
I think Clinton have been working too hard and need to rest. She's illucinating. I do't see where she can say she is more experience than anyone. Can she say she's ready more than McCain too? McCain have all the experience but he is missing strength, people function better when they are younger. Obama is the one we need. He have the right judgement. He is capable. He is ready to serve us, the people.
I am not sure why Sen. Clinton has so many super delegates.  The one memory I have of the Clinton years is, them losing the House and Senate. It scared me to deaf, because that night when Newt came on with his new contract with America, I had just graduated colllege and my Mom called me and told me, this is serious and bad for Dems. If she(her and Bill) are leaders they sure do not know how to bring their team or party along, and that is not leadership that is selfish. Nancy and Harry need to reflect on this, I really think if she wins the White House the leadership in the House and Senate will shift again to the Republicans in 2010.  Just my thoughts.  The Dems need to really think hard about that fact and I places in emaphasis on the Clintons did lose the House and the Senate for the Dems.
Wake up America! Hillary is the smartest, most experienced, toughest fighter, and a genuine genius. Don't belive me? Ask her,Don't believe her? ask Bill, don't believe him? Ask Chelsea........Oh I forgot, she only takes questions from students............
Hillary Clinton does have more incite to being the next commander in chief compared to Obama. Hillary has been with Bill since the very beginning of his political agenda and you would have to be absolutely comatose not to be aware of what it takes to be president. The Clintons' marriage, like  many marriages where there is a shared goal of success for
one spouse, where there is equal competency in intellect, knowledge, plus a common bond, etc. is simply completely different from most marriages. Hillary witnessed the workings of The White House for 8 years and it would be foolish for anyone to think this is irrelevant.  Maybe it was a "shared presidency"---I would think this would be a plus for anyone.  Trust me, there is a lot of truth to the the old saying,"behind every successful man is a woman".
Ask Bill Clinton.
She has lost my support.
It's Obama all the way baby.

I was in Hillary's camp until this past week.  Enough is enough.
If we know that the VOTERS aren't going to decide the nominee, if there is no way ethter candidate can achieve the nomination without the support of the SUPERDELEGATES, then WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR!  Come - on superdelegates!  It's your move.  
Enough talk about letting the voters have a say.  Don't insult our intelligence.  The voters and pledged delegates are split down the middle with no indications that the remaining states will change that.
Are we going to suffer through the negative attacks, distortions, distractions, misrepresentations, campaign propaganda, and maybe even outright lies, that are sure to come if this goes on to the convention?  This will seriously weaken the Democratic Party and its chance of winning in November.
Don't pander to us with your false high-minded ideals of letting the people decide.  We've demonstrated that we can't decide, decisively anyway.  So it's up to you, SUPERDELEGATES, to settle this.  The longer you wait, the more damage will be done.
She's an embarrassment to professional women everywhere.
I've been working as a chemist for seven years, so obviously my husband has seven years of experience being a chemist. My husband's been working as an electrical engineer for ten years, so obviously I have the credentials of ten years of electrical engineering.
As a working women, this argument makes me sick to my stomach. Yes, I would love to see a woman in the White House, BUT it should be someone who gets there on HER OWN MERITS, and not on her husband's record. It's EMBARRASSING to women.
GAME OVER.

HIllary Clinton has proven she can win the big states that are the must wins for the Dems in November.

Obama failed to close the deal. In Ohio, despite outspending Hillary 3 to 1, Obama carried only 5 out of 88 counties, FIVE! Those five counties are where the large black vote is, the only group of voters that Obama won. He carried the black vote by 86%. If you can't win Ohio, you can't win the Presidency.

Obama is unelectable. Obama needs to exit the race and the Dems need to rally behind Hillary, NOW.
The problem is that Barack (an African American) cannot go negative because if he does, then the "Big Bad African American has an attitude, and the little white lady is being attacked.  She knows the Country is still Racist and because most of this country is still Racist, he has to remain domicile.  Really the reason why Hillary get the uneducated votes is because they don't spend the time to research the information she puts out.  
FULL disclosure on the finances Clintons'!!!  Where exactly did the $5M come from?? Who is funding the library??   FULL disclosure on you white house phone and travel records Hillary!  What treaty in Kosovo did you negotiate?  That would be unprecedented (and scary) to have the first lady negotiating on our behalf.  That's the presidents job.
My son is a logger.  He calls me every morning on his way to work.  I have learned alot about logging, but that doesn't give me "experience" in the dangerous logging business.  If his "cutters" couldn't come to work, he wouldn't, in his "right mind" call and ask me to come to work with him, because I'm "experienced"!
If I had a "mock" logging symposium in my home, with loggers sitting around me...saying what I was going to do in the Logging Business...THAT doesn't make me a logging expert!  
These are all tactics.  Look at me sitting with generals!  
Look at me "looking" Presidential.  
That doesn't MAKE her "Presidential"!
Her sniveling petty attacks, constant complaining,
and lack of answering the tough Questions...
makes me question he ability to be President!
HOW will she mandate Health care.
What does she consider AFFORDABLE health care...$200. or $1000. a month.  What if you are a family with 2 children, WHAT will it cost a family of FOUR a month for her MANDATED Health care?
How will she ENFORCE this, with FINES, and then American's still won't have insurance??
When ALOT of American people are finding it difficult to pay for GAS, or buy that gallon of milk, how will they PAY for this insurance?
Will their wages be attached??
And if so, that means even less gas and milk for their families!
She has NEVER answered these questions!
She just keep talking about Obama.
Why doesn't she ANSWER THE QUESTIONS?
or doesn't she  want the American voters to know the answer until AFTER the nomination?

She seems to be more of same...
like her NEW FREIND John McCain...
and HIS FREIND BUSH!
Wow, Obama supporters are out in force today.  Good morning :) So I guess Clinton helping negotiate in Northern Ireland, acting as an envoy in Kosovo and fighting for women's rights in China (when they did not want her to come) doesn't count for anything.  I guess her experience on the Senate Armed Forces Committee (which I hear actually has meetings) does not count either.  I understand that Obama supporters are never going to believe the Hillary is experienced.  If you are undecided and reading these posts, I just ask you to look at her actual record.  She has done much more with foreign policy than her opponent.  Pointing out her qualifications does not make her a "monster" as the Obama campaign has called her.

Have a great day!

Hillary 08


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=739131

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google