ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



The reviews of Obama's speech are in

Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:36 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
The reviews from political analysts and liberal bloggers are mostly positive. Here's a sample of their reviews and/or smart takes...

The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder: "I do think that Obama's speech was a marvel of contemporary political rhetoric. Politically, analytically and emotively, it hit many high notes. His acknowledgment of white working class resentments (busing) and about the perception that there's been no racial progress, his willingness to stick by his friends, his grasp of history, his sense that our views of race are cramped and caricatured... all of that is something that even those who disagree with the substance of his speech, can, I think, appreciate."

The Politico's Ben Smith: A smart colleague notes that this speech is the polar opposite of this year's other big speech on faith, in which Mitt Romney went to Texas to talk about Mormonism, but made just one reference to his Mormon faith. Obama mentions Wright by name 14 times.

TPM's David Kurtz: "It is remarkable for its nuance, for its long view of history, and for its decency. I am not sure, on first take, how effective it is politically. Your thoughts? Late Update: The text is one thing. Delivery is another. And Obama doesn't seem to have his A game today."

TPM's Josh Marshall: "I think I have to dissent from David's view that Obama didn't bring his A-game to the speech this morning. I was only able to listen/watch out of the corner of my eye because I was on deadline for something else. But my sense was that the tempo and tenor was suited to the occasion. The kind of stirring delivery he's made a trademark of in his victory celebrations would not have been appropriate for the moment."

The pro-Obama Andrew Sullivan: "Alas, I cannot give a more considered response right now as I have to get on the road. But I do want to say that this searing, nuanced, gut-wrenching, loyal, and deeply, deeply Christian speech is the most honest speech on race in America in my adult lifetime. It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history... I have never felt more convinced that this man's candidacy - not this man, his candidacy - and what he can bring us to achieve - is an historic opportunity."

The pro-Clinton Taylor Marsh: "Senator Obama gave a speech today that is larger than politics, but it in no way ends his political challenges. The national wound of race Barack didn't want to touch is now reopened nationally and in the spotlight again. While his campaign wants to move on, the country will not, because everyone will be talking about race, through the invitation of Obama's speech today."

Scout Finch from DailyKos (which is mostly pro-Obama): "This speech is amazingly honest and will hopefully spark a long overdue discussion on race in America. We'll see if it is enough to blunt to criticism of his relationship with Reverend Wright.  I think he's done a spectacular job thus far of denouncing specific remarks by Reverend Wright, while still standing steadfastly by him and his community."

*** UPDATE *** Here's the take from CBN's David Brody: "We won't know for awhile how voters view Barack Obama's speech today on race relations but The Brody File saw it as a HUGE positive for Obama and a successful turning point for the future of his campaign."

*** UDPATE II *** Hotline On Call's Jennifer Skalka: "Obama gave an eloquent speech today that will do much to quiet the increasingly polarizing debate about race in the Democratic contest. But more importantly, and more tellingly, he gave a deeply personal talk about his race, about his experience as a biracial American. And voters needed to hear it. Not because his biography is, in and of itself, the answer for these confusing times, but because, perhaps, only a person of his experience can dare all of us to be our better selves."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

No more division!  No more parsing!  Not this time!
Obama '08!
The MEDIA is CRAZY to say this is a great speech instead of addressing the real issues of the man NOT choosing to seperate himself from a known ANTI-AMERICAN pastor. I expected this sort of spin from the media though.

So Sen. Obama LIED?

OBAMA is DONE... OVER and FINISHED (very sad). When you loose TRUST with the American people, it is VERY difficult to get this back... if at all.

TRUST is the single value Americas really care about and NEED most in their lives right now.

HOPE does not pay my bills; car insurance, mortgage, health insurance..

BUT TRUSTING in someone to help make things right DOES... and Obama has totally 100% lost this, not only are the chickens NOT coming home to roost, neither is TRUST !

What else will he lie about?  
William Ayers?
Tony Resko?
You can't make everything better with a speech.  His judgment and past can be cleared up with a speech...um no no.  His whole campaign can be run on a speech...um no no.  What if George Bush just gave a speech after he effed things up....doesn't help the situation.  I would like somebody with experience so we don't have to hear a speech!

Should Hillary deliver a speech on gender divide and make everything all better?  Guess what!!  She doesn't need to, because she has shown to succeed by her actions and not her words!!
Taylor Marsh's is the most honest assessment, and she admits that it was a powerful, transcendent, but somehow tries to spin it that a discussion about race is a bad thing.  Senator Obama's message is obviously that race discussion in the open political forum is better than the whispered conversations at dinner tables.  

She got it right, but for the wrong reasons.  this will work FOR his candidacy, not against it, in the long run.
Having heard Mr. Obama's speech today, I have never been more proud to be an American.  Viewers in other countries could have no better demonstration, as Mr. Obama so eloquently expressed, of the "genius" of the American system: the fact that we can change.


New York City
Still nothing beats the Tardis Speech from the Throne

http://tardis-db.co.uk/main.html
I'm a white teacher at a 60% minority school and deal with the challenges in educating our African-American students daily. From this experience, I believe Obama is a man who can guide us in a new direction. A man who can push this hot button issue and allow real dialogue.

I was deeply moved and am more steeled than ever in my support for this candidacy.
http://twocanpete.blogspot.com
When a person of wealth and privilage stills claims discrimination and wants to disparage their country you have to wonder if they aren't just mad about the color of their skin.
Keith Olbermann:

We are in the midst of a sea change. You have never wavered. You have never once put your finger to the wind to see what the rest of the media was saying. Your have remained steadfast in all of your reporting, every single night, with guests such as Jonathan Turley, John Dean, Richard Wolffe, Jonathan Alter, Howard Fineman and Rachael Maddow.

You may never fully realize what a difference you have made in these last few years. But you have. Countdown is the only program we can turn to when we want honest reporting. We get inundated with opinions all day long, with most everyone echoing each other over and over, depending on what the polls show. Most of us are now able to see through it all.

And while we will never fully be able to rid ourselves of the liars, the war mongers, the racists, the hate mongers and the hypocrites, at least we know we have a program we can turn to with a host who not only knows instinctively when our government and large chunks of the media are lying, we know also we have a man who will never be afraid to say so.

The air waves belong to us, the people, not a particular party. You and your guests may be the only people on television who understands this.  

The old way will not work any longer.

Thank you.

Obama/Webb 2008
Ignorance will always abound -stubborness will always rule in the hearts of some.  I applaud Senator Obama for confronting the issue head on as only he can, but unfortunately, the ignorant will choose to find fault.  They are too stubborn to view the world with open eyes - they will see the world their own limited & narrow viewpoint.
Alas most people won't listen to it, won't read it, wouldn't be able to understand it if they did.  They've made up their minds.  A year ago, I thought if the democrats could unite with a top notch candidate and pull in some independents and a few republicans, they'd win back the white house.  We got the top notch candidate in Obama.  Thanks to Hillary's lust for power, we'll have another four years of Republican rule.  This will be a sad day in history.
If Obama wants "unity", of his party he would "demand" that the Florida "fair" vote stand and all delegates be seated at the Democratic convention. Otherwise he will definitly loose the election.
I thought he could have nodded his head and pointed his finger more during the speech.  :-)

Just a little humor about the styles of Obama and Clinton.
I got chills reading the full text of the speech . . . I think this will go donw in history as one of the great speeches of the early twenty-first century.

I'm a white male, but I agree with everything Mr. Obama says. I hate so many things about the current political system (and don't let any of his opponents tell you that they don't hate it too . . . just listen o how they talk about each other).

We're at a crossroads. We, the people, can let this race get drug into the usual mud of politics and come out with no real changes to the problems in the system that we all hate, or we can reject it and unite behind change.

As for me . . . I say "not this time"
I have heard some of it and I am impressed. This man is special. We all know it. People want to put him down because he is special.
I agree with him on everything. We need a PRESIDENT who is willing to tackle all issue head on.
No more secrecy and divide.
You certainly have to applaud the courage of a man who is willing to make himself the lightning rod for the most divisive issue in American politics.  Especially when that man’s ancestry almost perfectly embodies the “melting pot” that American was supposed to become.  A brilliant speech, indeed, delivered on a whole other level -- and from the heart.

The politics of divisiveness?  Not this time.

Obama/Webb 08
Obama is OVER.

Obama is UNELECTABLE.

Obama's speech today did nothing but harm him more. His attempts to defend his "mentor" and "pastor" Jeremiah Wright are fruitless. It's telling that Obama seems willing to throw his ill, white, grandmother who took him in under the bus but not his racist friend and pastor. obama also admitted (after lying about it over the weekend) that he was in fact in his "church" during Wright's offensive comments. WOW.

Obama cannot defend the indefensible.

The only question that remains is how fast can the Dems get this toxic loser out of the race before he completely destroys any chance for a Dem victory in November???
I'm going to agree with my Republican husband...."brilliant, absolutely brilliant.  He has just won the nomination and probably the election".

I must say, it is a pleasure to listen/read a well-written speech again.  

He addressed those who wished to rattle his cage and it did it well.

Bravo - give your speechwriter a raise!
You know how in real estate its ...... location, location, location?  Well in politics its....judgment, judgment, judgment. Mr. Obama get a big fat "F" for a failure in judgment for sitting, year after year, under his Pastor’s venomous racial hatred, bigotry and unpatriotic trashing our country.   No amount of distancing from words will ever redeem a failure in judgment.
On balance, the reviews are very fair. All agree that the speech was substanitive and historic.

Those that support Clinton will continue to maintain that the intimations feel short, while Obama supporters believe it went well beyond expectations.

In the final analysis, ALL of us experienced  COMPLETELY cogent, inclusive speech that can can only be assaulted by those intent on continued division.
The reviews are spot on.  This guy does not stumble, but just keeps going, very aware of what's going on around him but never losing sight of the big picture or his own role in it.

As to Pat, yes, Keith O is pretty steadfast.
Most of what I read to reject the speech today is systemic of the context of his speech. I won't name anyone but their input is pretty consistent.

Jonah Goldberg said on "Morning Joe"

As long as guys like me can keep up the issue of Obama's minister then the issue of race remains a part of the discussion.

So while I don't suggest we ignore him or his ilk, but we can comprehend that the motive isn't understanding but division. Acknowledge that and .....
YES WE CAN.....move past this
"HOPE does not pay my bills; car insurance, mortgage, health insurance.."

You're right. YOU should pay your bills, car insurance, mortgage, and health insurance. Take responsibility for your life, you bum. The country has bigger things to deal with than giving you handouts.
I was reminded today why I fell under the spell of Barack Obama the first time I heard him speak four years ago.  Brilliance combined with honesty in a man more authentic, more decent than anyone in political life since Abraham Lincoln. If you read Doris Kearn Goodwin's Lincoln book "Team of Rivals" the similarities between these two men in character and personality are striking.
Obama gets an "A" for speeches and a "F" for action.  The American people can see through this rhetoric.  His ACTION was staying with and now continuing to standby a pastor who is clearly racist and denounces the United States.  His rhetoric of saying he knew nothing and rarely knew of Rezko based on a earlier debate this year and yet his ACTION shows that Rezko contributed close to a half million dollars to his campaign and they had adjoining properties and a close relationship.  We all know Obama has the ability to gives these great speeches.  So what.  These speeches mean nothing when you have a candidate whose action shows that he has a close relationship from a person of criminal activity and a candidate that has a close relationship with a pastor that denounces the United States and a candidate that voted "present" on many controversial votes that might affect his political career.  The American people are smart enough to see that Obama's action is what defines him not his speeches!   America will never elect Obama for President based on his actions!        
I'm sorry he has shown any reason that he should win. I believe it is him and his camp that have brought race into this election. Our economy needs help for everyone. He has been taught that only his people suffer. We are one nation and the middle class and poor are hurting. The middle class are black, white, brown, red, all colors. I want a president that looks at this country alot different than him. He will never be president.
What concerns me are the children attending these services listening to this hate and anger. Are they leaving the church feeling all warm and fuzzy? Or do they leave confused with hate in their hearts?
So all a person, any person has to do is give a speech and he / she can be president.  A flimflam man is KNOWN for being a good speaker, that is how they bamboozle you!
Wow now who wants to come with me and find my puppy and I have candy for you little innocents!???
AMBER ALERT (Sent Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:22 PM)
--------------------------------------------
So many words, just words and NOTHING HAS CHANGED!
I hope the fools that swallow this crap whole do not choke to death!
Wright is still a racist and Obama is still a liar!
OMG!!


CHAMELEONS ONCE SEEN....

It's not really an empty suit, it's multiple suits, the problem with chameleons are that regardless of the color of suit they wear today, behind the kaleidoscope of colors, it's still scaly, cold blooded, calculating, clever, opportunistic, and always trying to blend into their surroundings, it's how they stay alive....

But as anyone knows, once you see the chameleon, and put a good eye on him, it's hard for him to fade back into the back ground, that so carefully gave him cover through "color"....  It doesn't matter where he moves, jumps, swims, crawls, walks, or even talks.  Your eyes follow, and see the chameleon for what he is.... all the gifts of camouflage that so delicately hid his image are gone.....

The game is up Obama, you have never fooled many of us, mostly because we don't all operate on the guilt ridden liberal latte platitude, that your chameleon like gambit has allowed you to so successfully manipulate.  You ran a campaign on words, because that's really all you had to offer, you actual political resume is paper thin, your inexperience and lack of JUDGMENT is palpable.  The con game is not going to work, not anymore "Elmer Gantry" was character in a movie, not running for President.  

We see you Obama, you can't fade into the background anymore.  You ultimately have to be "somebody" someone with an identity... if you can't define what that identity is, then it is up to others to define it for you....

Your initial resounding success, at this slipping from one philosophical color, to another philosophical color, as clever as it has been,  has also been your greatest failure. In that nobody really knows who you are... the blank slate that you claim to be, is there to be colored in, because you have refused to color it in yourself.... You chose your surroundings, to color it for you.

"Yes we do."

See you Obama, and it is not the "Chameleon" you had "hoped" for.  It's the "Chameleon" that your really are....


Francis Crosby

OMG!!


CHAMELEONS ONCE SEEN....

It's not really an empty suit, it's multiple suits, the problem with chameleons are that regardless of the color of suit they wear today, behind the kaleidoscope of colors, it's still scaly, cold blooded, calculating, clever, opportunistic, and always trying to blend into their surroundings, it's how they stay alive....

But as anyone knows, once you see the chameleon, and put a good eye on him, it's hard for him to fade back into the back ground, that so carefully gave him cover through "color"....  It doesn't matter where he moves, jumps, swims, crawls, walks, or even talks.  Your eyes follow, and see the chameleon for what he is.... all the gifts of camouflage that so delicately hid his image are gone.....

The game is up Obama, you have never fooled many of us, mostly because we don't all operate on the guilt ridden liberal latte platitude, that your chameleon like gambit has allowed you to so successfully manipulate.  You ran a campaign on words, because that's really all you had to offer, you actual political resume is paper thin, your inexperience and lack of JUDGMENT is palpable.  The con game is not going to work, not anymore "Elmer Gantry" was character in a movie, not running for President.  

We see you Obama, you can't fade into the background anymore.  You ultimately have to be "somebody" someone with an identity... if you can't define what that identity is, then it is up to others to define it for you....

Your initial resounding success, at this slipping from one philosophical color, to another philosophical color, as clever as it has been,  has also been your greatest failure. In that nobody really knows who you are... the blank slate that you claim to be, is there to be colored in, because you have refused to color it in yourself.... You chose your surroundings, to color it for you.

"Yes we do."

See you Obama, and it is not the "Chameleon" you had "hoped" for.  It's the "Chameleon" that your really are....


Francis Crosby

Obama must have been wearing Romney's magic underwear for this one.

Great Speech
The Senator missed the point.  He needs to convince Wright he is wrong.  Not to convince us that these wrong views won't prevent him from making the right judgements.
Natalie,
When in glass houses, don't throw stones.  Hillary Clinton should heed those words.  Why?  Because she has spent the past year ranting about how her opponent has "nothing but speeches." (you xeroxed her quite well in your post).  Yet, when her SCHIP claims have been denounced by those involved, her claims on Northern Ireland have been denounced by those who achieved the peace, and her claims about Bosnia have been utterly rejected by those who were on the comedy and singing mission with her, what does she have?  A SPEECH.  One speech in Beijing.  That's it.  
It made my leg tingle.
Pat, Boston re: Keith - Amen!

I just cannot think of anything that Sen. Clinton would have to say that could rivet the national attention to that podium.
People will be discussing this and the issue which is important to the nation, not just some petty political swipe of the day. When it's from the Clintons, it's Bill being Bubba, throwing blacks under the bus when they've supported him for so long, or Ferraro's unfortunate and old pol remarks, hiding documents-again. And now it's the visuals of an activist black church suddenly thrust back in the media, churches like those down south that Bill Clinton is very familiar and comfortable around but knows darn well that PA blue collar men would not.
Timing? Is this SC all over again from the Clintons?
This is why no one will be riveted, ever, anytime Sen. Clinton takes the podium. No one will discuss around their schools, offices, blogs, etc., her vision, her speeches. Ever.
Whoever is our President, must want to be and be the President of the United States. Not just want to be President.
So all a person, any person has to do is give a speech and he / she can be president.  A flimflam man is KNOWN for being a good speaker, that is how they bamboozle you!
Wow now who wants to come with me and find my puppy and I have candy for you little innocents!???
AMBER ALERT (Sent Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:22 PM)
--------------------------------------------
So many words, just words and NOTHING HAS CHANGED!
I hope the fools that swallow this crap whole do not choke to death!
Wright is still a racist and Obama is still a liar!
OBAMA=LOSER
To all reviewers it was / is all that and more.  Yes - we will be talking about this through the week and that is not all bad either for the country or his candidacy.  It was only a speech that he could give from his unique position among the candidates.

Their will be those who praise and those who will vilify each to their own experiences.
Well let's see he started out as far back as 1787 and then he started bragging about his wins in the white states. He blames the racial tension in South Carolina basically on the Clinton's. He lied before , because he said he know how Wrights racist words were  divisive, making excuses, more excuses blah, blah, blah, Geraldine Ferraro brought up, OJ. Well, he covered all his bases, but the speech was just empty meaningless words trying to prevent even more damage. It was not effective at all.
These RACIST Democrats, including the Clintons, are NOT being addressed by the media. MSNBC is doing this country a deep disservice by not bringing the Racist Democrats to the forefront, I can't believe the Racist Clintons have divided this country so much. just so she can have the nomination
I am white.  I want to ask white people how many family, friends, colleagues, clients, etc. would they still be speaking to if held to the same standard to which detractors are holding Obama for his association with the reverend?  Are any of you willing to NOW, TODAY call out anyone with whom you interact who ever said something you found offensive to another race, religion, gender, etc.?  Would you get a divorce?  Quit your job?  Move out of your neighborhood?  Disown your own offspring?  Put your frail old father out on the street?  Maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe you'd impress me with your righteousness.  Maybe you will be an inspiration and example for us all to follow.  Kinda doubt it, though.  
It's a good thing he is not white or a woman of any color because then no one would pay any attention to this speech.
And thank you for helping to split the democrats kieth by commiting yourself to the Obama like a news man should.I wish I had an hour a night to vent about my favorite canidate.
Natalie,
On your second post, I have to respond again.  You are quite effective in xeroxing the "poll-group tested" lines that Mark Penn gives Hillary and her supporters.  But again, just because you say it doesn't mean it's true.  WHAT ACTION?  2 months ago, I would have given her credit for SCHIP and maybe partial credit for Northern Ireland.  Now we know that the two things she holds up as "getting results" are NOT HER ACCOMPLISHMENTS.  She's snookered the media and obviously you but that doesn't mean her claim of "results, actions, fight" rather than "words" is accurate.  No, in the harsh light of day, her claims have been shown to be false.
few points.  

1.  The other night in his damage control interviews, he said that he never heard this type of talk when he was in the pew.  He even went as far to say he would have gotten up and walked out.  Yet, now he admits he heard such talk and didn't agree with it.  Yet, now he tries to deflect it onto those who have heard words in churches they didn't agree with?  What a walking contradiction.

2.  He talks about bringing everyone together to beat this issue, yet he denounces Rev. Wrights words, yet he still had his children listen to these words on Sundays?   If he doesn't believe those words, and he thinks we need to get past those types of speeches in order to make things better,  then why have the next generation, IE your children, listen to those types of words.  Especially when children are more likely to believe what they heard, instead of dicifering what's right and what's wrong?? Makes absolutely no sense.  

3.  He says we shouldn't be wasting time on things like this and the words of surrogates like Gerry F???? WTF.  It's been a campaign policy of his to spin the words of Clinton surrogates and play the race card.  WHere was he when the news networds were beating up Gerry F and HRC over Gerrys' words???  Instead he said those words have no place in this election process.  All the while Axelrod was attacking HRC over those words from Gerry F.

THE AUDACITY OF HYPOCRISY.

Also, I hate the fact that he choose more to deflect onto others the hatred of his Rev., from comparisons to other Rev's, to the Gerry F comments, and even to go as far as to say things about his white Grandmother.   This speech was all about politics and all about him attempting to deflect the damage with a bunch of words in which he was really saying.  "Let's just forget this and move on"  "nothing to see here"  and if you comment on this issue, you are the problem.  What a crock of crap.
AMERICA THE BRAVE.. WRIGHT?

Keep in mind that 90% of America will think the way that the MEDIA wants them to think, so guess what tha means??

If you are hearing such positive spin from this speech in the press, he has in fact done what he needed to do.

Remember that this speech aired at almost 11:00AM EST. Most people are working at this time. I do not know if will be re-aired in prime time, in all fairness it should be so that all Americans get to see it in it's entirety. They will only hear what the media wants them to hear.

I will say what I said before in other posts...

This speech was a GREAT speech, BUT given the circumstances it was probably only a double when he needed a home run.

If he was to give this speech before the Rev. Wright fiasco, what would be your thoughts?
Pretty good reviews. Maybe enough to nail down the nomination, if he hadn't already (oh no, the dreaded math argument rears its ugly head again).
Please note -
Every post that is mine is Kathryn in Bham. I think some people assumed that the Kathryn in the last blog was me, but I did comment under Kathryn in Bham.

I agree that this speech was stunning. My pre-speech comments were that I was looking forward to something of a 'King - like' speech, which is what we got. I don't think that it separated Obama from the race issue, but rather showed his credibility with regards to this issue. That is what I was saying; not that his speech was anything less than a call to action and rallying of his troops. I tried clarifying on that blog, but Mark didn't post my comments...
Exceptional, articulate, believable, honest...Obama because of this controversy received an incredible opportunity to demonstrate his vast appeal.  Courageous. He will be ready and right on day one.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=779342

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google