ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: The tipping point

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:41 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd and Domenico Montanaro
War of words: Democrats who don't have a horse in the presidential race, but do have to worry about House and Senate races are starting to wonder aloud if this protracted primary fight has hit a tipping point. Every day this goes on, they say, is bad for the party as a whole. Every day this goes on, they say, is bad for the party as a whole. Remember, there's a reason that the party that gets its nominee first has won 9 of the last 10 presidential elections. Think about the most recent and memorable primary fights for presidential nominations: Ford-Reagan; Kennedy-Carter; Mondale-Hart, not a single ultimate general-election winner. And all three, to this day, have bitter partisans who still bicker about that fight. The same thing is happening with Obama-Clinton. There's a real bitterness developing that rivals these other three examples. Check out how James Carville didn't back down from his "Judas" remark on Richardson at all. In a conference call with reporters Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson said, "If I had said it, I would apologize, because I am representing the campaign. I did not say it, and if I had I would." Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign is using Gen. McPeak's "McCarthy" attack on President Clinton and trying to raise money off of it.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd talks about potential fatigue within the Democratic Party as a result of the prolonged nominating contest.
 
*** “Misspoke?”: The Clinton campaign in a conference call yesterday said Hillary Clinton “misspoke” when she said, “I remember landing under sniper fire” during her trip to Bosnia. OK. But there are two problems. What she said was with certitude (the remarks you can find on her Web site; those remarks on the web site, by the way, are "as delivered" not "prepared for delivery" as was mistakenly reported by one of us on TODAY). But beside that, as NBC’s Ron Allen writes, “Believe me, if you've ever been in a place where there is real sniper fire, it’s unforgettable…. As her team points out, Obama probably doesn't have very many, if any, similar experiences to talk about. But, apparently embellishing a story, or ‘misspeaking’ about it, will only lead to more questions about what Clinton really did when she was in places like Bosnia.” Or her role in the Irish peace talks or in children's health care, etc. This brings a focus back on her at a time when she'd rather see the press continue its focus on Obama. For instance, were it not for the Bosnia story, today's NYT piece on Obama's liberal record in the Senate might be the cable talker of choice.  
 
*** Women back in Focus: The last two weeks were dominated by race and yesterday, in addition to her speech on housing, Hillary Clinton held a “Women for Hillary” rally -- “the first such event in weeks,” notes NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones. This was something that was routine in Iowa and New Hampshire, but has faded of late. Is gender politics making a comeback?  Women, particularly older women, have been the backbone of Clinton's support both at the ballot box and apparently in her bank account. Pushing the issue of gender is also a way to create a movement that is similar to what has propelled Obama. The one demographic subgroup among women that has eluded Clinton to an extent has been educated younger white women. If she can crack this code, she'll have the chance to really make up ground fast in places like North Carolina and Indiana, let alone over-perform in the Philly suburbs and potentially keep Obama's vote total lower than expected in Pennsylvania.
 
*** Bluegrass primary? Bill Clinton campaigns hard in Kentucky today. Yes, Kentucky, which holds its primary on May 20th. Is this a sign this will go on and on and on -- even if Clinton loses Indiana or North Carolina? Clearly Kentucky is one Clinton's base states of the contests that remain and considering that the campaign still doesn't have the money to start paid advertising in Pennsylvania, let alone the May primaries, the campaign has now decided it's important to start showing up some of these places early so that Obama doesn't get the head start he's gotten in so many of these places. Bill Clinton's been used more and more as the campaign guinea pig, sending him first in some of these places to see what the response will be. He was in Indiana before his wife; he's hit North Carolina before his wife and now he'll hit Kentucky first as well.

*** Another sign of things to come? By the way, check out the added stop Hillary Clinton has made for Montana on 4/5 and 4/6. Montana is a JUNE primary state; the last day of the primary season. No doubt Clinton is sending the subtle message that she's in this race to the end. But why else would she set a Montana campaign stop two months before the primary? Is there an endorsement she's bagged that she'll unveil that day? Look for reporters to start making calls to Montana's Democratic hierarchy, all of whom would be good gets for Clinton: Gov. Schweitzer or Sens. Baucus and Tester.

*** More fun with delegate math: It's been a while since we've done the percentage game on the delegate count. Here's where things stand right now. Obama leads among pledged delegates 1408-1251; Clinton leads among superdelegates, 255-218. Added together, Obama's overall delegate lead is 120, 1626-1506. Now, what's left? There are still 10 pledged delegates NBC News hasn’t allocated from contests already held. In addition, there are 566 delegates at stake in the remaining contests. On the supers front, there are 321 folks who haven't picked sides (76 of whom have yet to be named; they'll get named at state convention meetings held between now and the end of June). OK, now, let's play the math game. If the remaining contests split up "as expected" meaning Clinton wins her base states (PA, KY, WV etc.) and Obama wins his base states (NC, OR, MT etc.) and the two split Indiana down the middle, the two campaigns will likely split those 566 delegates right down the middle 283-283 (margin of error +/- 5 delegates). This means Obama would need 34% of the uncommitted superdelegates to hit the magic 2024 number, while Clinton would need 72% of the uncommitted Supers to hit 2024.  

*** Messages of the day: While Obama finishes up his vacation, both Clinton and McCain have major speeches today on two different topics. Clinton will focus on Social Security, timed for the release of the government's report on the long-term viability of the government trust fund. Word is Clinton will pop McCain on the issue; Meanwhile, McCain, fresh from Iraq, will talk about the housing/mortgage issue in a speech in California. The speech is more of a lesson in how this happened and a promise that he'll be open to some government solutions but he wants to make sure we're not bailing out speculators. Like Clinton and Obama, he calls for a summit of sorts, McCain's summit would be with the largest mortgage lenders.
 
*** On the trail: Clinton makes two stops in Pennsylvania, including a town hall and a meeting at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review; McCain again raises money in California; Bill Clinton makes four stops in Kentucky; and Obama is still on vacation with his family and will be back Wednesday.
 
Countdown to Pennsylvania: 28 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 42 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 224 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 301 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639 to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

She says she misspoke?  Are you totally out of control now?  I am supposed to believe you misspoke twice in the same day with prepared remarks?  Oh wait, you will change your story again and move the goals posts.  I get it now.

If you want any chance of regaining your credibility, release your tax returns immediately.  Otherwise, quit the race now.
Woman Voter in PA wrote yesterday: “I am PROUN[sic}D TO SAY I AM ONE OF THESE WOMAN IN PA. I just came from her HQ in Johnstown PA and I can say that it is an AWESOME sight to see so many Woman supporting Sen. Clinton !!!   I am very very proud to be an American as she is the best solution for ALL Americans.”

This is a serious question that I’m hoping the blogger who posted this can answer.  I am legitimately curious about this and hope you can shed some light.  I don’t begrudge you for being in favor of one candidate or another but am just wondering what you say to young women and young men (not sure if you have kids) about the following:

1) Senator Clinton’s actions in Michigan and Florida in which she pledged one thing and then later says something completely different.  How do we justify to our kids that “you should just throw a big enough temper-tantrum and you’ll get your way.”
2) Senator Clinton’s persistent “stretching the truth” or “clumsy” language as First Read put it about her experience both on domestic and foreign relations issues.  When we teach our kids, we call it LYING.  How is this a good role model for our children?  “Stretch the truth until you can no longer get away with it and then say that you “misspoke.”

Thanks.  Hope to hear from you.

Did Hillary also "misspeak" about SCHIP, FMLA, NAFTA, Macadonia and Northern Ireland?  These accounts too have been debunked as wild exaggerations or terribly misleading, but the TV press gave her a free pass.  Isn't it time you guys looked at this pattern, especially considering that "experience" is the foundation of her campaign and she says the reason that she matches up well against McCain is that she passes "the commander-in-chief" test?
I heard your commentaries on The Tipping Point last night Chuck.  And I have one question for you, WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG?  Not only did I reach my tipping point as February winded down (in the days prior to Ohio and Texas) but I regularly wrote about it in First Read comments :).  This is old news to me but its good to know some people are finally getting it.

Carville's pretty bitter, huh?  I used to be a fan.  He is mistaken that loyalty trumps everything else.  Perhaps he has made his money off politics too long...

I have my own line in the sand...I do not support the Clinton's tactics.  I believe they are ruining the Dem. party.  I will never vote for either of them again.  Obama had to defend himself and its gotten nasty.  Who didn't see this coming?

If Obama is not the nominee, most likely I will not vote for either Clinton and McCain (and this has never happened to me before, I have never not voted for President).  I still believe I can go to the polls and vote down ballot for Dems.  I may reregister as an Independent (we'll see how this plays out).

Tremendously supporting Obama, HOPE, 08

Read the David Brooks article
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/opinion/25brooks.html
Hillary knew what she was doing when she "Misspoke" This is another example of how Hillary tries to beef up her resume with things like her so called foreign policy experience (which anybody with a brain knows she has none), this so clled 35 years of experience, which she has some and her inability about finding solutions to whatever problem there might be.
You don't "confuse" a photo-op landing with one in which you are actually being shot at. Clinton lied, again.
Hillary Clinton speak with Fork Tongue.
Tell the truth. We make mistake but in the end lairs can hurt all of us.
This year's election is different. Usually we have to wait until the general election to see Willie Horton adds.
*******IMPORTANT - Words from PA*******

I must say, there is serious doubt in recent days regarding the elect ability factor for Sen. Obama. The words and associations present by the candidates is disturbing, to say the very least.

I have spoken to many persons in my county as I am an active member of the Dem. party here in PA and I will say, I have spoken to persons who were previously leaning toward Obama and with absolute certainty - MANY are saying there is MORE explanation required as to Sen. Obamas 'Chosen' associations with his Pastor, Tony Resko and now - as someone pointed out in last nights meeting a person known as William Ayers (???).

IF he is chosen as our parties nominee, the words I am hearing from persons on the street indicate that either they will not vote or they will vote for McCain as most in my county (PA) cannot bring themselves to vote for Sen. Obama who to many here, seem extreme.


SPeaking of delegate math when will MSNBC add Puerto Rico's primary to the day-by-day political calendar on this page.  Why are you leaving them off? What's the bias all about?  Even the dreaded FAUX News Channel reported about PR yesterday.  Where is the NBC article?
Just wanted to share something I read last night about North Carolina.

It has gone for the GOP since 1980. Jimmy Carter was the last Democrat to carry it in 1976. Even John Edwards on the ticket in 2004 could not bring it over to the Democratic side.

The African American population is 21% in NC. In South Carolina it is 29%. In Georgia it is also 29%. And in Mississippi it is 39%.

So why is NC suddenly so important in everyone's eyes? Seems like it is demographically pretty even as far as who it would "favor." It is not a liberal state, does not have as large an African-American population as other Southern states, and is quite rural except for the three cities of Raleigh, Greensboro, and Charlotte.
Liar, liar, pantsuit's on fire. Senator McCain misspoke when confusing the players in Iraq. As Chuck NY rightfully points out, these were prepared remarks.

One aspect that has not been commented on by the press is----what mother in their right mind brings her 16 year old daughter into harms way and possible sniper fire?
Ok...She "mispoke", how in the world do you misspeak on a topic like this! Hillary mispoke on what could have been a tragic event at the time for her and her daughter. I don't know about the general public..but when I served in the military I remember when my plane was shot at. You don't forget..and all of sudden lie about something like this. Again same ol politics. I have a question...Does it make you wonder where this country is headed when we allow politicians... to grossly mis-lead the public. If we l Americans lose what is our status as a great civiliazation..then it's our fault. Not the politicians because we elect them. W. Durant said " Great civilizations are not conquered from external means but rather crumble from within" The American public needs to bear heed to this. But yeah...but it seems no one in this country likes to hear constructive critisism of itself..or your UNPATRIOTIC! I still will support Obama. He's not perfect but he is the best candidate..I choose honesty any day over someone trying to pull the wool over my eyes. And if he dosen't ghet the nomination...I will vote for McCain! You see America ..African Americans can vote republican. I don't need goverment..to solve my problems!
Way to go Dems I have just yesterday changed my afiliation to Independence because of how angry I am with what's happening with the party. I truly thought the dems were a shooin for the presidency not anymore. Previous history of 1968,1972, and 1980 proves that point. How sad the Democratic party has become such a laughing stock.
is hillary running for president of the women of the united states? can you imagine the up-roar that would occur if a male candidate held a 'men for whomever' rally? the hens would surely be a cackl'in, no double standard here
Why is it when Hillary Clinton makes a mistake, or says she "misspoke" people make a big deal out of it and call her names?  Yet when Senator Obama makes a mistake or misspeaks, "I only did 5 hrs work" "Rezko raised $150000" "I never heard those things"  people are willing to accept his explaination.  I find it baffling people will accept him at his word at the same time villifying Senator Clinton for a much more minor mistake.
"I believe strongly that in a democracy, we should respect the will of the people and to me, that means it's time to do away with the Electoral College and move to the popular election of our president." - Hillary Clinton to CBS News, Nov 20, 2000.
"One aspect that has not been commented on by the press is----what mother in their right mind brings her 16 year old daughter into harms way and possible sniper fire?" (Michael Steuer)

THANK YOU for saying this. I was struck by the irony of Clinton's comparing being President to being the mother of a family at the Women's Summit in Pennsylvania, and then seeing Chelsea next to her in the file footage from Bosnia when she'd indicated there was sniper fire. Even if, as she's tried to say since, there was only the threat of sniper fire, why did she let her daughter step off the plane? Is the best way to protect yourself from sniper fire to hug an 8-year old girl to your chest?

I have to say, too, I'm dismayed at their sending Bill to campaign in Kentucky and their setting up the beginnings of an apparatus in Montana. I am so sick of this already. The thought that it will continue until June just makes me ill. Good or bad, I just do not want to hear the name "Clinton" anymore.
Of course this prolonged primary is damaging the party.  With the fight going on, even with many now admitting that it's pretty much apparent that Clinton cannot win the nomination without completely destroying it, no one has the spine in the party to take control of things and provide some direction.
The hands off of the leaders is frustrating because i read the supers are waiting for some sign and lead from the leaders.
Everyone is ready to do something except take control and end this too long and destructive ending.
Could we please stop the ridiculous assertion that Obama lied when he said he did not hear the statements by his pastor that were currently being blasted 24/7 on FOX News, but then admitted in his speech that he was present to hear some things that may be considered controversial? It's been proven that the sermons being broadcast were given on days when Obama was not present, or even in the state of Illinois. By admitting he'd heard statements that could be considered controversial, he was simply indicating that to some, anything can be controversial. This was not an example of his being caught in a lie, or even fudging the truth, and it's certainly not on par with repeatedly claiming to be under fire in a foreign country until video evidence proves the lie.
Nafta, Ireland peace, FMLA, S Chip, Macedonia and Bosnia..  All lies.  Hillary didn't have national security clearance, she is not ready on day one even with Bill providing her with the Cliff notes
I support Hillary 100%.  We all are human and make mistakes.  Obama's associations with Willaim Ayers,
Rev Wright and Rezko (where is the coverage on Rezko??) are huge mistakes and ones that I cannot overlook. It is at the core of his character.  
Why did Hillary lie about her coming under sniper fire?Perhaps a guest on Meet the Press Sunday had the answer when talking about Bill's sly digs on race, being patriotic,etc he said Bill just can't resist it,even tho it has always come back to bite him its part of his make-up so it is with Hillary, lieing has become an ingrown part of her make up,she just can't resist it.!!!
Michiel Beloit in IL,
You know the problem here; you're just not willing to acknowledge it.  This was not a "minor" problem.  Senator Clinton has based her ENTIRE claim on the Presidency on the fact that she's the most experienced.  And, she won votes in Texas and Ohio based on the red phone ad in which she implicitly claimed tons of foreign policy experience.    It's like the Bush Administration with their constant drumbeat of "Saddam and Al Qaeda are linked."  Eventually, people start believing it.  In both Senator Clinton's "experience" claim and the Bush Administration's Al Qaeda claim, it was a lie.
Are some of these large numbers of people switching over to the Democratic side in registration in Pennsylvania 'Rush Limbaugh devotees?' Are they going to create mischief as they did in Texas and Ohio? Just a thought.
It’s becoming clearer every day that the only reason Hillary can possibly have to stay in this race is to do everything she can to ensure that John McCain wins in the fall.  Then she can run again against McCain in four years, when the electorate will finally wail “uncle” in response to TWELVE years of Bush…and she can step in as Savior….

Oh wait, she’s already cast herself as Savior, right? Since Bill Richardson is “Judas…...”
"I support Hillary 100%.  We all are human and make mistakes.  Obama's associations with Willaim Ayers,
Rev Wright and Rezko (where is the coverage on Rezko??) are huge mistakes and ones that I cannot overlook. It is at the core of his character."

And apparently hypocrisy is at the core of yours.
The "Tipping Point" for me is Rezko, Rev. Wright and the William Ayers questions and that is just three of them.  There will be more.  Perfect she ain't but
at least we have seen all her warts.  Obama's are just now been exposed.  
1.   So Richardson was not Judas when he was actually running for Prez himself?  C'mon Carville.
2.   The Math. Chuck, doesn't the 2025 'magic number' decrease if one 'excludes' MI and FL?  I.e., if they have 300 delegates between them, wouldn't the number needed to 'win' decrease by half that (or all of it?)?  
The Clinton's have shown themselves to be pathelogical liars, expecting the rest of us to accept complete fabrications as having "misspoken". Had Obama done the same, the outcry would have been deafening.

Likewise, the Clintons are again attempting "New Math", discounting the Will of the Voters who have placed Obama ahead in the delegate count, popular vote, and number of states won. NOW at this stage of the campaign, the potential Electoral Count should be relevant. Once again, were Obama in the same position, he would not have been allowed this charade and would have been forced out of the contest by now. What's "Democartic" about this kind of behavior?

In the General Election, the ONLY one who can defeat the Democrats are the Democrats themselves. Unfortunately, the jobs is being well performed.
Dee in Tennessee a Hillraiser (Sent Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:18 AM)

Dee, I feel the same way about Clinton's associations with Norman Hsu, Whitewater, role in Monica Lewinsky's scandal, Chinagate, Johnny Chung, James Riady, John Huang, and Charlie Trie. I also feel the same way about Bill Clinton's relationships with Sally Perdue, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Juantia Broaddrick. So I agree you should look at the people that a politician surround themselves with!!!

RECORDS SET by Bill Clinton

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

Dear JB,NC

I think there is interest in NC for a couple of reasons: 1) Charlotte area has many young people as well as many transplants from the Northeast which appeal to Democrats, 2) Raleigh has many young people from the university area as well as a high number of blacks  3) Many of the military, Fort Bragg & Camp Lejeune are not as gung ho about staying in Iraq as they were 4 years ago and McCain means more of the same.  I for one was a life long Republican that switched to Independent so that I can vote in the Democratic primary. I know of at least thirty other Northeners that have done the same because we like Obama and we saw first hand in New York what Hillary the carpetbagger is all about, HERSELF.
If Senator Obama were caught telling such bold-faced lies as Senator Clinton on her Bosnia experience, HE WOULD BE DONE!!!! How can anyone still support her? These people cannot be shamed. They never have been able to be. Any sane person would hide under the nearest bed, and never come out. Not them. They just keep on keepin on.

Is it me, or does it seem that Clinton, and McCain are trying to trump Barack's "more perfect Union speech", by giving major speeches of their own, just a week later? LOL with that.

Pulling for Obama '08
The sad thing about The Tipping Point kind of issue is that IF Barack Obama becomes "unelectable" it will be because of all these attacks from Clinton and because the Democratic party did not unify around him early enough.  Were the party to unify around him now, they could win in Nov.  If this goes on for three or more more months than neither is electable.  This was the scorched earth policy unleashed by the Clintons a month (or so) ago.  Many of us saw it coming.  Nobody took care to stop it.  We get what we get.  This was not inevitable, this was purposeful.

Obama can survive the only horrid blow that he has had so far (the Wright loop played out of context over and over).  He showed himself to have tremendous leadership potential.  But can he win with the Clinton's leading the charge against him in the general?  Hmmm, how high are her negatives?

This is what we do in America.  We seek to tear down those among us who would rise us up.

Sad here in central CT...but willing to believe it can and will be different.

YES WE CAN!

Woman for Obama 08
At least Hillary went to a country in a state of war while First Lady.  Laura Bush hasn't, Barbara Bush hasn't, Nancy Reagan never did...and we can be sure McNasty hasn't brought his trophy barbie doll wife on any of his mid-east trips.  So, whether Hillary mispoke, exaggerated, lied, whatever, about dodging bullets, etc., is irrelevant.  She's done more substantive things as First Lady than any other First Lady that preceded her, or followed her, save, except, Eleanor Roosevelt.  
To 'thought for the day'

Perhaps your county Dems wouldn't vote for Obama because he's black and are only looking for an excuse to use not to vote for him.   If any of them have half an open mind or heart they wouldn't make up their minds so quickly especially using the reasons listed.
Read the posts above concerning Ms Hillary and on other posts of First Read, not exactly a fan club for her?   She has a lot more baggage to explain truthfully.
Its called democracy, people: messy, argumentative, yes, but healthy and green and growing. Out of debate and discussion comes a better solution. This is what makes America strong: our freedom of speech, of assembly, and the freedom of the press. Hillary is toughing Obama's campaign, everything is getting aired now. She's laying the groundwork for the change that is coming. Obama is new on the national scene and needs to be tested and exposed in the public square if he is to assume the mantle of the Presidency. Everything is working as it should be. (I'll say it again, we need new pundits. I'm smarter than David Brooks and Chuck Todd!)
Well, now it all depends on what the definition of "misspoke" is. If it means lied, then yes, she misspoke about the snipers and many other things.
Clinton is living up to her original label; divisive.  She will ruin the Democratic Party.  I stopped supporting her when she and her husband started pulling the race card, making Obama a candidate who happened to be black into the "black candidate" way back in So. Carolina.   I resent that and the MSM are continuing to be ringside cheerleaders for her behavior.  Clinton and Carville now represent "old politics".  I'm going to cast my lot with the young people...I have faith in them and their audacious hope.!!!
Poll this morning has said over 50 % unhappy with Obama . I believe it was Rasmussin . I talked to Dnc this morning and Fl. and Mi wont be seated .They can vote in Jan. Obama had to drag his feet and run clock down so now it is pretty well sealed . I believe our only hope is Hillary. She maybe could help with these two states in Nov. They will not vote for Obama. With an over 50% disfavor rateing and the ire of these 2 states He will not have a chance.Exit polls go up each time as to Obamas ability to  not get Hillarys voters. I wouldnt even vote if he is on the ticket.vp or pres. NO. The party is makeing a big mistake because they assume dem. states will vote dem in Nov.Wrong I have talked to hundreds of people and they all say Obama they will go repub or not vote. He is toast. Trying to stop election now has turned even more away.The tough fight hasnt even started for him and he had to take a vacation after  one tough week?? Pleeeeeeeeeeease.,His wife wont be proud of her country this year. Wright wont be wailing from White House and Farrakhan wont be cruising the halls. Black Panthers wont have security of the place. Not this year
The Party is trying to shut this thing down now.  Bill Richardson got the ball rolling last week.  And everyone seems to be ignoring Harry Reid's comments that were reported by Molly Ball yesterday in the Las Vegas Review Journal:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/16948521.html
Iowan: The 'magic number' of 2025 is calculated without FL and MI. If those two states were to be counted, the delegate count would increase. Chuck probably knows the number.
As for Sen Clinton's electoral college remarks, those were made in the context of what happened to Al Gore in 2000. Note, however, that the electoral college is still around and is likely never to go away and that a winning candidate must reach 270 electoral college votes. Many Obama supporters, particularly those younger voters who have not followed politics probably honestly believe that he has a chance of picking up red states; many would say that that is doubtful. Look again at the electoral map for 2000 or 2004 and place upon it an overlay of the current results in the Dem primaries. What red states will Obama be able to win? And what if he truly can't win Ohio or Florida?
Of course, if media outlets such as First Read continue to portray every Clinton statement as beneath contempt and every Obama statement (no matter how false) as excusable.
I remember during the debate on campaign finance reform, the Republican line was that if the bans on soft money went through, the mainstream media would be choosing our next President. Hats off to Mitch McConnell ... he was right.
Michiel W So. Beloit, IL

Give me a break...the point is no one says anything when she does something wrong.  Why can't you see the double standard?  It has been there the entire time.  

If Obama says something, it is talked about for a week.  {The nerve of him to say something about the Queen?}  She misspeaks alot of many of the issues that she is supposed to be a subject matter expert on.  Then to lie about being shot at in Bosnia, while her daughter was there too, is nonsense.
Enbellishing -misspeaking=there was no meeting with Canadian embassy    ok was a meeting NAFTA wasnt mentioned        ok it was mentioned  but we corrected statement made there (yep) Obamasother advisor tells  bbc oh he didntreally mean that is what he would do in Iraq he couldnt do that it was a political speech. My judgement is best elect me cause I didnt vote for war.2003 well maybe I would have 2004 My opion is same as Bushes. on and on  AND ON
No way this thing goes to Kentucky. The Dem brass will intervene by then. Or else McCain gets the win by summer...

http://www.political-buzz.com/
Face it, James Carville is a skunk
James Carville is a Democratic Karl Rove
He was ALWAYS known ofr his smear cmapaigns

It's just that Democrats looked the other way

I've gotten a dozen mailers from Carville
I just thorw them away
Why even read them
A skunk is a skunk

By the way, notice that ex-Clinton aid David Gergen LIED for Hillary
When NAFTA support was being discussed, he said that Hillary opposed NAFTA

THAT WAS A LIE
CNN seems to hire old Clinton aids to puff up Hillary and lie about her record
Regarding the Wright moment, Obama just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The Republicans, Hillary and media are trying to make something out of nothing.

It's his ‘I didn’t inhale’ Clinton moment: Obama really didn’t know that Rev. Wright was saying those Anti-American things in his sermons, and yes even after attending the same Trinity church for 20 years.

Give the guy a break (and a well deserved vacation).
WOW. Bills now got only 3 Pinocchios to Hillarys 5.  Never thought I would see that happen.  I can't help believe that both their mothers would be very disappointed in their actions and lying on the campaign trail.
It appears Politics is a nasty BUSINESS.  Currently one of the largest businesses in America.  The only upside to it is that the Clintons will drag the whole democratic party down with it in 2008.
Keep up the good work Bill & Hillary.
Hillary is the last line of defense against having another Republican in the White House. I don't want a Republican in the White House but I could never vote for OBama.  There is too much about O'Bama that
we do not know about yet.
I want this race to go on long enough to put Hillary on top. If MI and FL counted she would be in the lead. Obama is stealing from us just like Bush 2 did. If peoole had taken the time to look into Hussien Obama they would know there are questions about how he feels about this country, white people and his lack of judgement. This yellow dog may change colors if the voters don't wake up and put her over the top.




SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=803864

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google