Why no mention of the FACT that Canada has said several times, in several ways, that it was the CLINTON camp that called Canada???  Come on... give Canada some credit for setting that record straight!!

Another Bosnia-like lie.  This one is also going to blow up in HRC's face.  Latest PPP poll in PA has Obama up by 2 points.  After this NAFTA lie by HRC gets out, that number is going to rise quite a bit.

Did Obama call Mexico and Canada's Goverment b4 the speech?

Perhaps this news cycle the media can accurately report that it was the Clinton campign that did the wink wink with Canada.  Its really academic....Obama will be our Nominee.

Dems beat McCain

OBAMA LEADS IN PA,http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2008/04/obama-takes-lead-in-pennsylvania.html

"...after it was revealed that an economic adviser had met with Canadian officials on the topic. (To reassure or to not reassure? That’s the question.)"

So, even though this has been debunked and the Canadian government has stated it originally was the Clinton campaign that approached it to "reassure" it was all posturing, MSNBC still insists on falsely reporting that the Obama camp did it. Not only is MSNBC buying into the practice of believing anyone who accuses another of doing what the accuser actually is doing, but it's not taking the balanced and principled effort to report the entire story. And, despite even having at its disposal Sen. Clinton's released White House schedules, which document her tacit (if not explicit) endorsement and championing of NAFTA. I know the public isn't paying MSM journalists' salaries; however, we are paying for the public airwaves, so it would be nice if we at least got the best, most accurate coverage possible.

And don't forget about her Outsourcing to India deals. Not only was she in favor of NAFTA, she's also a strong proponent of outsourcing, especially to India.  Tons of information can be found on the Net about all the money the Clintons made on that deal.  No wonder she's refusing to show her income tax returns.

Maybe this was a "sleep deprived" memory....

http://twocanpete.blogspot.com/
Let's go over this one more time. Canada is not the problem!!! Canada has enviornmental and labor laws with teeth. China does not! Canada does not have slave labor camps, child labor, and half of their water unfit to drink due to industrial pollution. China has all those things and more. Canada does have vast quantities of oil, minerals, and lumber that we need and an appetite for our finished goods.

What I don't understand is why she insists on making these statements that she was opposed to NAFTA from the beginning even AFTER news stories and hard evidence has come out showing she lobbied for NAFTA's passage from the beginning.  Seriously, once the evidence came to light she should have dialed down her rhetoric.  Perhaps she has been telling the story long enough that she now actually believes it to be true, despite being confronted with evidence to the contrary.

Caught in another exaggeration or outright lie. Perhaps we should begin forging all the exaggerations or lies from Hillary and mend them into a single word or a campaign slogan for Obama. We can start with something like Bosta or Naftia. If we want to include her false claims of experience and her claim of winning Texas we could lengthen the word for now to "Bostaxperaxs" or perhaps "Naftiaxperaxas". On the other hand if we keep merging portions of exaggerations or lies from Hillary into a single word or campaign slogan we wouldn't have enough room on the largest of bill-boards or banners to write it all out. We would need the side of a very large building no doubt.  

We know Hillary that your only pause on Nafta was due to the fact that you thought it might preclude and upstage your failed health care plans and not because you thought that NAFTA was wrong. I recall seeing a video of you at the time being asked about NAFTA and you stated "I think it would be good for the country". The Obama camp needs to find that video (MSNBC has it) and play it over and over and over again as a TV campaign ad.  

Since you have no facts on 'Canada', that story should be shoved back in Hillary's sink, and sent down the disposal.

This is another Nafta smoking gun. Not that it was needed. NAFTA was a platform she proffered for her senate seat. Senator Clinton should produce these people she claims she adressed regarding her professed, dissatisfaction, and disagreement with NAFTA.

Paying attention Pennsylvaina?

Where is the Clinton gag reflex, when it comes to telling lies?

Pulling for Obama '08

Hillary, you got caught again, with another lie.

the clock is ticking on your Tax Returns, remember you promised before/by April 15.

So I guess George Miller is now saying, "Shame on YOU, Hillary Clinton, shame on YOU!".  

Let's all agree now.  NAFTA was either improperly implemented or a downright mistake.  It was the brainchild of the Clinton Administration.  Instead of Hillary admitting it was a mistake and moving on, she continues to claim that she wholeheartedly opposed it.  If she had admitted that she didn't know it would have turned out this way and it was a mistake, I and many other American workers, would have a lot more respect for her.  

Just like George W., she can't admit to mistakes and learn from them to improve our condition.  We need someone in office who can admit to mistakes then correct them and move on. We all make mistakes, even the high and mighty politicians.

George Stephanopolis, the host of ABC This Week, who was in the whitehouse at the time, backed up Hillary's claims that she was opposed to Nafta, but MSNBC, won't tell you that, because they love Obama.

He said she was oppose to it , but had to help the President get Nafta through, because that is what people who work for the benefit of the President do.   Many others who worked in the whitehouse have also confirmed that, but funny how MSNBC doesn't put a little footnote at the bottom of a Post like they always do when they Post something about Hillary.  

Here is the best part.  If you are going to hold Obama accountable on Pastor Wright, and call it a “JUDGMENT ISSUE,” then you had better hold Hillary accountable for Bill Clinton, and call it a judgement issue!  That’s right! Yes—I am going there!

Bill Clinton has abused Hillary in front of the whole nation with several scandals that would make the best wife–leave!  Let’s look at Hillary’s judgment concerning–Bill! What is her message to all women? That it is ok for their men to have--“affairs?” Is this her message?  You would think that she would have better "JUDGEMENT" than to stick with this guy. This is a very fair comparison concerning "JUDGMENT"
and one that is very close and personal: even more so than a person's selection of a church!  

In fact, I think we should run to the superdelagates to tell them how this could hurt Hillary’s ELECT ABILITY; because the Republicans will use this as Hillary’s bad JUDGMENT, concerning Bill’s affairs, and many other prior "Clintonian" issues.

Obama, you are too kind and good!  Good Luck

All Obama has to do is point his finger to the promises she made to New York when she ran for Senate, too. Promised 2 million jobs and they've currently lost 300,000. Same thing is promising now and we all know how good her "word" is!

Gee !!
Are they gonna accuse Hillary of 'misleading' voters
Was Hillary tired when she spoke about NAFTA
Maybe she just 'misspoke'

George Miller is a progressive Calif. Congressman
He's an ally of Nancy Pelosi, our House Speaker

The walls are closing in one the Klintons
Keep talking about pocket book issues
Keep talking to working people  !!

Ask Hillary about her sponsorship of ;outsourcing' deals with Indian companies.....
See is she 'misspeaks' ....

Clinton busted once again!  I don't see how anyone can trust anything she says anymore.  I hope that she tries to attack Rep. Miller liked she attacked Sinbad so the story gets even more traction.  Soon even more people will come out and expose her lie.  Her ONLY complaint against NAFTA was that the timing of it interfered with her failed healthcare initiative.

You mean Hillary lied?  No!  It can't be!

Obama in 2008.  Integrity matters and the Clintons have none.

I wonder if the people of Ohio knew the truth about Hillary Clinton and NAFTA if they would still vote for her?
This is just another case of Hillary Clinton
"lying with such ease it's frightening"-David Geffen

I wonder if the people of Ohio knew the truth about Hillary Clinton and NAFTA if they would still vote for her?
This is just another case of Hillary Clinton
"lying with such ease it's frightening"-David Geffen

Even as someone who prefers Obama, I have to admire how well the Clinton campaign plays the media

1. Need more cash? Leak a few stories about not being able to pay staffers (second time they've pulled that stunt to help close a a month out strong), or how much Obama's campaign out-funded them in the previous month

2. Need to put a positve spin on PA even though a) Clinton is expected to win BIG and b) she still won't have anywhere near the lead in the delegate count or the popular vote? Have a poll released that shows the Obama is now in the lead (does anyone really believe that he has come back by over 30 POINTS in 3 weeks???), so that Clinton can claim another "striking comeback" after she wins the state

Love 'em or hate 'em, you have to admire how skilfully they play the game, eh?

Ye Old Clinton--Arkansas-- Flip-Flop:  First she's for NAFTA then she's against.  First she's for the war, then she's against it.

Ye Old Flip-Flop--Hillary--
Let's jus HillBilly our way outa this one--k

NAFTA, Taxes, White House papers, Donor List........

She is such a LIAR....

When do you guys report Bills TIRade???? Look @ huffington Post to see Bill in his real form.

And when does MSNBC make Hill stop lying about Obama blocking any vote????

Look, let's just get one thing straight: the fight over who is more negative or who is more positive is all a crock.

FACT 1) Both campaigns have a TON of supporters (both high-profile, like Ferraro and Wright, and not-so-high profile, like patty,sd), and among those supporters, there are those who want to see the race run positively, and there are those who want to drag it into the gutter. Don't tell me which campaign has been more negative. There are morons on both sides.
MY OPINION) I say look at the candidates themselves: I have seen more positivity out of Obama than Hillary, but that's just my opinion (I've heard Obama on Today say that one of the most important qualities he's learned is empathy, and he is always admitting his faults... whereas I always get this feeling of "Oh, uh huh, yeah right, shame on you" from Hillary... not to mention the sarcasm)

FACT 2) Wright may have been racist or unpatriotic in his commentary, but look at the kinds of responses people are giving back. These reactionary comments have made Wright look like a saint. People are now using this topic as an excuse to bring everything back out of the closet and turn racist themselves under the guise of "he started it!!". It doesn't matter who started it... do you really want to perpetuate it? End it. Don't just put it back in the closet. Look at yourself and realize your bias and destroy it. Just stop.
MY OPINION 2-1) Hussein is an awesome name. I've known some guys named Adolf who were teased every day of their school lives, and they were the nicest people you'll ever meet. Could you elect a president named Adolf? If you can't, your vision is cloudy. Period.
MY OPINION 2-2) Guilt by association is the stupidest thing to come along since pet rocks. Do you really want to be judged by everyone you knew that held a similar role that Wright did? And even more, do you really think you're a paragon of virtue if you're using a hatred that you think is RIGHTEOUS to combat Wright's statements? Maybe it would've been righteous if you'd written a respectful letter of protest to the TUCC, but if you're spouting off at the mouth on some message board, you're actually worse than he is. You're using the internet in a cowardly fashion to air your racist rants. At least he did it out in the open, and there was a point behind what he was saying, so you could dig in and ponder what was behind it. Internet spammers are just bricks, you really wanna try to dig deeper in THAT?

So... who's more negative? Does it even matter when you're negative too? Check yourself before you open your mouth.

Stick to the issues and get back on the path.

NAFTA will come back to bite Hillary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG00SWAqcvw

She was for it before she was against it.

http://thepajamapundit.com/

Well Miller may not remember Clinton lobbying against Nafta but others do. However everyone does remember Obama criticizing Nafta while his top surrogate was in Canada reaasuring  government that nothing would change.

HRC supported NAFTA and Bill pushed it through.

She SAYS that behind closed doors she opposed NAFTA, but why should we believe her?  I mean, she just LIED to our faces about snipergate.

If she didn't support NAFTA then why didn't she stand up and fight against it?  I want a president that says what they want and what they think is best for the country, and not a president that just goes along with what someone else says.

Gee, that sounds like another pattern:

Voted for war but didn't really want war.
Voted for bankruptcy law, but hoped it wouldn't pass.
Supported NAFTA, but really didn't.
Landed in sniper fire, but again, really didn't.

Two patterns, repeated LYING and repeated flip-flopping.

Go home Hillary.

We don't need ANY MORE Clinton lies, drama, and scandal in the WHite House.


Obama 08

Well Miller may not remember Clinton lobbying against Nafta but others do. However everyone does remember Obama criticizing Nafta while his top surrogate was in Canada reaasuring  government that nothing would change.

FOR SOMEONE AGINST MUD SLINGING IT SEEMS THATS ALL THEY DO ON THE OBAMA SIDE THOUGHT HE WAS FOR CHANGE AND WOULDNT LET ANY OF HIS CAMP OR SUPPORTER DO THAT JUST ANOTHER LIE OF HIS AND JUST MORE WORDS NO ACTION AND IF HE OBJECTS TO THE FLORIDA VOTE GETTIG COUNTED HE SHOULD JUST BE LEFT OUT AND ALL GO TO CLINTON THAT WOULD ONLY BE FAIR TO FLORIDA

George Stephanopolis, the host of ABC This Week, who was in the whitehouse at the time, backed up Hillary's claims that she was opposed to Nafta, but MSNBC, won't tell you that, because they love Obama.
**************************************************
Yes, and Stephanopolis has absolutely no reason to shill for Hillary. Come ON - He has been a Clinton cheerleader forever and can hardly be considered objective. I watch his show nearly every week, and I have come to the conclusion that he is auditioning for another job with his old bosses.

Well, I remember Hillary ducking sniper fire on her way to oppose NAFTA and expedite the release of her records at the White House.  Her accountant was with her and that is when the tax returns were set on fire.

Hillary jumped on the returns to save them, but then Bill's dog ate them.  Talk about a fighter!  She is still doing hand-to-hand combat trying to get the list of donors to Bill's Library released.

Due to “you’re being DUPED” by Hillary and her statements, the flip-flop on NAFTA, the flip-flop on the Michigan/ Florida Re-vote, the flip-flop on the Iraq war, and her basic negative campaigning practices: then please listen with rapt interest to following:

WARNING: THIS MAY BE YOUR LAST CHANCE “TO CURE  YOURSELF” OF THE DREADFUL DISEASE CALLED: "CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS!"

If you believe that you have been brainwashed, by the “Clintonista  Brainwashing Machine,” and that you have been inadvertently infected with "CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS."   Quick, call for a quarantine procedure specialist and get this plague under control!

You can tell if you have "CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS" from the following telltale symptoms.
Every time you open your mouth, the following occurs: inaccuracies, inattention to detail, and flat out un-truths; not to mention distortions, disruptions, and miss-communications, temper-tantrums, and inconsiderate language communication.

You must seek the CURE IMMEDIATELY in order to avoid further BRAIN-ROT!

YOU MUST Read THE FOLLOWING TEN TIMES TO AVOID "CLINTONITIS-LARENGITIS:"

1. Obama is the one, the only one, who has great public education programs for our children: This inspires trust!

2. Obama is dedicated to his loved ones/family: This inspires trust!!

3. Obama is the one: who has spent his life serving others rather than trying to get rich(like hillary): This inspires trust!

4. The rich and powerful are few: but they will try to destroy Obama because of his stance on special interest: Obama's Courage inspires trust!

5. Obama is can speak the language of economics and can speak about real solutions: This inspires trust!


6.  Obama is the one who gave an historic speech that challenged us to see beyond the color of ones skin: This inspires trust!

Did you read the above ten times?
Good, then this will make sense to you now:
Clinton has failed to INSPIRE --anything!

...'Because she was a liar," Zeifman said. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."...'


Other than that, she was a fine lawyer



'...Hillary fired for lies, unethical behavior from Congressional job: former boss
by Ed Morrissey

As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary"s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy"s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation " one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman"s career.
Why?
"Because she was a liar," Zeifman said. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."...'

I had also informed Hillary that the Douglas impeachment files were available for public inspection in the committee offices. She later removed the Douglas files without permission and carried them to the offices of the impeachment " where they were no longer accessible to the public.
Sierra, SF (Sent Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:31 AM)
Sierra, SF (Sent Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:31 AM)

Dang!! She has found her calling and it`s called HRC the LIAR!!

HRC just cannot tell the truth, got fired for lying.
Who would have thunk it... LOL!!!
Ireland = peace talks...... LOL!!
Bosnia = sniper fire....... LOL!!
Chelsea = Where?.......... LOL!!
NAFTA = I was against it............LOL!!
Open borders in Macedonia........... LOL!!
Oh, and this one comes to mind.
My husband didn`t sleep with that woman, or that woman and that woman either. Yeah right they deserve each other.


Go Obama '08

Pennsylvanians don`t fall for the lies, she did the same to the voters in Ohio on NAFTA and now they realized that she TOLD THEM A BALD FACED LIE!
HRC is proposing billions of dollars a year Wednesday to keep jobs from being shipped abroad as she appealed to blue collar workers in Pennsylvania. How can you believe this when she said the same thing in New York when running for the senate and the people in New York are still waiting for the 2000 jobs she promised back then. She blames it on the situation of who was president at that time. HRC simply cannot own up to her lies ( Oops! I mean misstatements.)
Shame on you HRC trying this same old tactic again, Pennsylvanians if you fall for this as the voters did in Ohio regarding NAFTA then it will be your loss, this woman simply cannot tell the truth.

Hillary opposed NAFTA? Was that before or after her
and Bill made " a killing" on NAFTA. Outsoucing in
India and TATA ring any bells?

Obama '08

I have a real problem with Hillary Clinton's tact on Nafta.  First off perhaps in private she was against it, some of the people who worked with her in the White House have backed up that theory.  But what difference does it make if she praised it in public?  She was the first lady and gave speeches praising it, it really doesn't matter whether she personally agreed with it or not, she talked the public into it.

Rochester, NY,

It doesn't matter if she opposed NAFTA behind the scenes!  She actively lobbied for it even though she didn't agree with it!  If that's no big deal then why is Obama staying in his church, even after his pastor said some outlandish things, so much worse?  At least Obama's decision didn't do serious HARM TO THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN LIVES/FAMILIES!

for those interested in knowing THE TRUTH!!!!!!

The Obama campaign has tried to deflect attention from Goolsbee by making false attacks on Hillary Clinton. Several members of the Clinton administration and Clinton biographers independently confirm that she was critical of NAFTA in the early 1990s.
DAVID GERGEN: "I was actually there in the Clinton White House during the NAFTA fight and I must tell you Hillary Clinton was extremely unenthusiastic about NAFTA. And I think that's putting it mildly. I'm not sure she objected to all the provisions of it but she just didn't see why her husband and that White House had to go and do that fight. She was very unhappy about it and wanted to move on to health care. So I do think there's some justification for her camp saying, you know, she's never been a great backer for NAFTA." [David Gergen, Anderson Cooper 360, 2/25/08]
DEE DEE MYERS: Q: And you know, Dee Dee, the first thing that came to my mind is, "Come on." What is she going to do?... Meyers: Right, and she did express - I was there too - and she did express reservations about it, as she said. [MSNBC, 3/20/08]
MICKEY KANTOR: "In August in 92, we had to make a decision," Mickey Kantor the former U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Clinton adviser, and free trade advocate recalled for the Huffington Post. "President Clinton had to make a decision as governor, whether or not he would support [George H.W. Bush's] NAFTA, and of course he did... Hillary Clinton was one of the great skeptics in the discussion as to whether he should do. So she was always skeptical beginning in 1992 and onward." [Huffington Post, 2/14/08]

It's only a matter of time ya'll. Barack Obama is the better choice for the 2 nominees. For obvious reasons.

It didn't work the first time lets try it again. Something tells me that with Miller now being out there plus her first lad schedule that this might work better this time around. The race is getting closer in PA so this could be an interesting couple of weeks.

Will Pa.Be tricked by the clinton like OHIO.

Hillary is rewriting history. The Clintons are liars and corrupt. They will say anything to win. Wake up America, let put and end to this corrupt Bush/Clinton dynasty.

MSNBC Questions Clinton's Truthiness, Says She Was Pro-NAFTA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG00SWAqcvw&eurl

NAFTA and Hillary Clinton's credibility problem
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFuA0z4kKD4

Hillary Rodham Clinton Flip-Flops on Iraq
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dFmTAPmrbo

A Pattern Of Hillary Clinton "Misstatements"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixg4F-qnQvQ

Hillary Clinton Lies about Bosnia: Lies Lies Lies Yeah!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8_odhuWfTk

"However everyone does remember Obama criticizing Nafta while his top surrogate was in Canada reaasuring  government that nothing would change." --Rich D pgh
******************************************************

Rich,

It would seem that maybe all of the facts to the "Nafta-Gate" story hasn't yet reached you. I just want to help give you a better understanding of the story so please read this article.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/reportsfromabroad/macdonald/20080310.html

Pennsylvanians don`t fall for the lies, she did the same to the voters in Ohio on NAFTA and now they realized that she TOLD THEM A BALD FACED LIE!
HRC is proposing billions of dollars a year Wednesday to keep jobs from being shipped abroad as she appealed to blue collar workers in Pennsylvania. How can you believe this when she said the same thing in New York when running for the senate and the people in New York are still waiting for the 2000 jobs she promised back then. She blames it on the situation of who was president at that time. HRC simply cannot own up to her lies ( Oops! I mean misstatements.)
Shame on you HRC trying this same old tactic again, Pennsylvanians if you fall for this as the voters did in Ohio regarding NAFTA then it will be your loss, this woman simply cannot tell the truth.

HRC just cannot tell the truth, got fired for lying.
Who would have thunk it... LOL!!!
Ireland = peace talks...... LOL!!
Bosnia = sniper fire....... LOL!!
Chelsea = Where?.......... LOL!!
NAFTA = I was against it............LOL!!
Open borders in Macedonia........... LOL!!
Oh, and this one comes to mind.
My husband didn`t sleep with that woman, or that woman and that woman either. Yeah right they deserve each other.

Isn't it worse if you publicly lobby FOR something that you are AGAINST? Just wondering...

Anything Obama has to say on the topic of NAFTA is just laughable after his secret meeting with Canadian officials in Chicago. Do we forget so quickly that he first denied it flat out as no contact at all and then amended it slightly and then finally only after the proof was blatant he confesses that yeah there was a conversation but trust me it wasn't about NAFTA and selling out Americans....yeah right..ROFLMAO

"George Stephanopolis, the host of ABC This Week, who was in the whitehouse at the time, backed up Hillary's claims that she was opposed to Nafta, but MSNBC, won't tell you that, because they love Obama."

I'm sorry, but she can;t have it both ways. If she's out holding pro meetings and luncheons about nafta, lobbying for it but saying something in private, sadly doesn't count. It just doesn't work that way. Sorry. Move on.

Damn it.. Hilary is out of control and she such a liar.  I don't understand why the media is not really spinning the fact that she is unelectable because she is a liar, just like Bush.  Say anything, do anything... to meet their personal agenda.

And Obama never attack her, he only defended himself

REmember this...

Bombshell: Watergate-Era Judiciary Chief of Staff: Hillary Clinton Fired For Lies, Unethical Behavior; Update: Audio Added
By Rizzuto

Tue Apr 01, 2008 - Not in the least surprising, we know Hillary is a liar but apparently, her pattern of lying and unethical behavior began even before she became a politician, when she was still a young staffer working on the Whitewater investigation. This from Dan Calabrese of North Star Writers Group:
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
Update: Here is audio of columnist Dan Calabrese on today's Wilkow Majority, explaining Hillary's lies in plain English.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):