The Clintons' policy differences, part II
Posted: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:18 PM by Mark Murray
From NBC's Mark Murray
Following our earlier report of policy disagreements between Bill and Hillary Clinton -- over NAFTA, the Colombian free trade deal, boycotting the Beijing Olympics' opening ceremony, and torture -- there are a couple more disagreements we forgot to mention.
One, Bill Clinton, as the New York Times reported earlier this year, supported Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev's bid to head Europe's Organization for Security and Cooperation -- while the US government and Hillary Clinton opposed it.
Two, Bill Clinton advised leaders in the United Arab Emirates on how to quell US opposition (including from his wife) to the port takeover by Dubai Ports World. At the time, a Clinton spokesman said that Bill's advice had involved just one phone call, and that he agreed with his wife that state-owned companies shouldn't own US ports.
Considering those two additional examples, the Clinton campaign might confront this question from critics: How do you explain some of Bill's financial ties to these disagreements?
As the Times reported, the Canadian mining capitalist Frank Giustra gave (or pledged to give) the Clinton Foundation a combined $131 million, which came after Bill accompanied Giustra to Kazakhstan, where Clinton issued his support for Nazarbayev and where Giustra afterwards won a lucrative mining contract.
Bill didn't earn any money when he advised the UAE regarding the Dubai Ports World controversy. But he has raked in hundreds of thousands of dollars by giving speeches in Dubai, and Dubai contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his presidential library.
And as already mentioned today, the New York Post reported that Bill earned $800,000 in speaking fees from a group supporting the Colombian trade agreement.
But Clinton campaign spokesman Jay Carson -- who previously handled press for Bill Clinton -- says it's unfair to link this money with these Bill-Hillary disagreements. Regarding the Colombian speech, Carson notes that Clinton supported the trade agreement well before he ever gave the speech. Clinton's support "had nothing to do with his speech," he said, adding it shouldn't be surprising that a Colombian group would support free trade with the US.
Indeed, Clinton always has been a free-trade advocate; his wife has been much more skeptical. (Given his position on trade, it might be even worth asking whether Bill Clinton -- in 2008 -- could win his party's presidential nomination.)
Carson also says that Giustra contributed money to the Clinton Foundation because he supports its initiatives combating AIDS and global warming. And regarding Dubai, "This is nothing," Carson said -- Clinton answered one phone call and his recommendation was consistent with his wife's position.
"There is no there-there to any of these things."