ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Hillary on Hill v. Bill, more

Posted: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:07 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
ALIQUIPPA, Pa. -- When pressed by reporters Wednesday about the fact that she is against the Colombia Free Trade deal while her husband is for it, the New York senator said husbands and wives often disagreed on things.

Clinton also discussed former Chief Strategist Mark Penn, why she wanted President Bush to consider skipping the opening ceremony of the Olympics and repeated calls she had made earlier to President Bush to address her questions about an endgame in Iraq and allowing Congress to debate any long-term security agreement during a roughly 13-minute press conference.

On the Colombia trade deal and disagreeing with her husband: "I have been a consistent and strong opponent of the Colombian Free Trade Agreement. I voted against CAFTA. I voted against fast-track authority for the president. I have been calling for changes in our trade policies. I have a long record of having a different attitude toward trade than my husband does. I don't think any married couple, who I know, agrees on everything, and we disagree on this."

More: "This is a great debate. You know, there are two sides to this issue. It's not 100 to nothing. I believe that the weight of the evidence, clearly in my view, supports my decision not to support the Colombia Free Trade Agreement. But, you know, very credible people, who care deeply about the country, and who have a commitment to work for working people in this country, have a different view."

She said she had not asked the former president not to speak publicly about his own views.

When asked about whether her connection to Mark Penn could hurt her with working class voters, she said she didn't believe it would.

"I don't see why it should, you know, my position is clear,” she said. “I'm on the record. I have been for quite some time. I've already taken votes that are very indicative of that record. I have a long history of supporting working people and families and a lot of great support from unions here in Pennsylvania and across the country and, you know, there wasn't any connection between my campaign and what he did in his independent business capacity. And if you contrast that, with what Mr. [Austan] Goolsbee who went to the Canadian government on behalf of the Obama campaign did, I think, it's quite stark. So I believe that we took appropriate action."

Clinton said Penn's firm continued to provide polling and advice, but he was no longer the chief strategist, and she did not answer a question about whether it would be good to sever ties with him.

On the Olympics: She said she was not of the view that the Olympic torch should not be run in America.

"I think you've got to separate out the Olympic movement, to an international sporting event that is hosted every two years,” she said, adding, “And that's why what I've called for is a government to government response. I believe that the President should not attend the opening ceremonies, because that is giving a seal of approval by our United States government. Unless until the Chinese government take actions to deal more forthrightly with their human rights' challenges, to begin to lift the oppression on the Tibetans and restore a cultural and religious freedom, work with the rest of the international community to try to resolve the genocide in Darfur. And on these matters, the Chinese government has to change. And that is what I believe the President should be looking for and using the pressure of his not attending the opening ceremonies as a means to exert some leverage on the Chinese government."

On the close race in Pennsylvania and Obama outspending her: "I've always believed this was going to be a close race,” she said. “Clearly Sen. Obama is investing an enormous amount of time and money in Pennsylvania, so he is running full speed toward April 22nd. He's outspending me maybe, two- or three-to-one in the state."

Clinton declined to answer a question about whether her daughter made a better surrogate than her husband, saying she felt she had two great surrogates and only hoped to amass the economic record that her husband had.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

How can anyone say that accepting 800,000 from Columbia has NO effect. I just can't get over the hypocrisies of Hilary's campaign, denote Penn, excuse her husband. Who has more direct effect on her ideas and policies, she admits they talk about everything. She uses his 2 terms as a springboard for her own political career and claim to experience, but when it's not convent for the voters she's targeting she disowns them. I use to like Hilary, now if Obama doesn't win the nomination. I simply won't vote.
Hillary & Bill are total hypocrytes.

Hillary is a congenital liar.
HRC is so wishy washy.
She knows damn well that Bill was,is and  always has been for the trade deal with the Colombians.
It is so clear that she knew this, this is just another way to get free publicity and we all know this.

This is just another NAFTA deal that there was a  slip that Penn let get out and if it hadn`t happen we would have never known until it was too late.

Late as in more jobs shipped to other countires.

NAFTA all over again. She got caught. Why do you think that Penn is still working with the campaign,
because they have too much invested in the Colombia
trade deal already and they will not back out now that is why Bill is pushing for it.
Theres money to be made and the Clintons do not care whom they have to step on to get it even if it is the American people.  

No! I say  that HRC is trying to pull a fast one, mark my words and see what the out come will be.
NAFTA all over again.


Pat Buchanan is a racist.....
Who cares ...... they willnot be in the WH again, and America will be better for it. Can we believe ANY SINGLE STATEMENT that she says? One word answer ... No.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=872891

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google