ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: McCain's econ challenge

Posted: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:21 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

 From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** McCain’s economic challenge: McCain has yet another opportunity to break through the Clinton-Obama storyline -- and the “bitter” controversy in particular -- when he delivers a major economic speech this morning at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. While the current political debate in the last few weeks has focused on whether Obama’s recent remarks on small-town America will doom him in the fall, or whether Bill Clinton and his trouble with the facts might do the same for Hillary, McCain has said things that are potentially more problematic for the general election. Two of them are on the economy, which has emerged as the nation’s No. 1 issue. “The issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should,” he said in December. And he mentioned this to the conservative Stephen Moore in 2005: “I’m going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics that I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated.” But McCain does have three things working in his favor: 1) his name isn’t George W. Bush; 2) he’s a budget hawk; and 3) he has time to strengthen his economic credentials -- hence his speech today.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd discusses the aftermath of Obama's "bitter" comments and previews McCain's speech on the economy today.

*** The speech: And McCain is using that time to re-brand his economic image. The speech he gives today is more than an economic speech; it appears to be philosophical on how he would conduct domestic policy -- carving out a Teddy Roosevelt approach. In the speech, per excerpts, McCain will make it clear that he isn’t a 100% laissez faire Republican (“We have a responsibility to act, and if I am elected president I intend to act decisively”); that he has a populist message (“Americans are also right to be offended when the extravagant salaries and severance deals of CEOs … bear no relation to the success of the company”); that he’s an ardent tax-cutter (both Obama and Clinton are “going to raise your taxes by thousands of dollars per year, and they have the audacity to hope you don’t mind”); and that he’s serious about cutting pork (“I will veto every bill with earmarks, until the Congress stops sending bills with earmarks”). Unlike McCain's previous attempts to speak about the economy, this speech actually sounds like McCain, both in words and in approach. He read his previous economic speeches -- this one seems like it fits his philosophy. The accountability/transparency argument for both business and government and the call for cutting pork is McCain. He still may have to explain his one time opposition (then support) for the Bush tax cuts, ditto for the cost of the war. But it appears today McCain will finally find his voice on the economy. McCain’s campaign reinforces the speech with a new TV ad that will air in “select” Ohio and Pennsylvania markets. “Taxes -- simpler, fairer,” the ad goes. “Energy -- cleaner, cheaper. Health care -- portable and affordable… Big ideas for serious problems. John McCain.

*** Obama passes his first test? As we said yesterday, we likely won’t know the damage from Obama’s “bitter” remarks until after the Pennsylvania, Indiana, and North Carolina contests. But a new Quinnipiac University poll shows that the controversy hasn’t seemed to hurt him just yet. The poll, which was conducted April 9-13 (the bitter comments became public on the 11th), has Clinton leading Obama in the state by six points (50%-44%), which is unchanged from last week's Quinnipiac survey. Moreover, the pollsters say there was no noticeable change in the results on April 12-13, when the "bitter" began to receive tons of media coverage. But that is just one clue, and more are certainly to come. Obama's folks are taking comfort in the Gallup tracking which also hasn't changed. Meanwhile, Obama gave his latest explanation of his remarks to the Philly Inquirer and Daily News. “‘The problem was that I just mangled it, which happens sometimes,’ he said. The thoughts that ran together, he said, were that people who feel abandoned find stability in their traditions but also are vulnerable to politicians exploiting wedge issues. ‘As a wise older woman who was talking to me the other day said, 'You misspoke, but you didn't lie,'" he said.”

*** Going for the kill: Question: How often do you see a politician -- who’s leading a contest in high single digits -- launch a negative TV ad? Well, that’s what Clinton (who’s ahead in Pennsylvania but trailing in the overall nomination race) did yesterday, when her campaign unveiled a man/woman-on-the-street TV ad in Pennsylvania that criticized Obama over his comments. “I was very insulted by Barack Obama,” says one person in the ad. “It just shows how out of touch Barack Obama is,” adds another. This is a gamble in this respect: It means the Clinton camp is going for the political kill on this issue, both with PA voters and undecided superdelegates. If Clinton doesn't win Pennsylvania by bigger margins than, say, where polls have things now, will supers deem this tactic as having failed and pressure the Clinton camp to stop the constant hits? Expect Obama to respond on the paid airways in some form today. Meanwhile, the Obama camp has launched a Web ad (i.e., no money behind it) that slams Clinton on her ties to lobbyists. And don’t miss the fact that liberal (“elite?”) op-ed writers have begun coming to Obama’s defense. See below.  and

*** More auditions: Another day, another fresh opportunity for more veep speculation. Romney, for example, appeared on Morning Joe previewing McCain's economic speech today. In addition, Biden speaks on Iraq today, auditioning in a way for the Dem second slot. In his speech at Georgetown, he challenges both McCain and Bush on Iraq and foreign policy. “When it comes to Iraq, there is no daylight between John McCain and George W. Bush,” Biden will say, according to excerpts. “They are joined at the hip. When it comes to Iraq, there will be no change with a McCain Administration.” The role of the running mate is usually of attack dog in some form, be it on the personal or on policy. Biden is flexing his ability to challenge McCain, something both Clinton and Obama will need help with if they are the Dem nominee. As for Romney, having him as a surrogate on the economy is probably the best use of his skills right now.

*** And just asking: Wouldn't an Edwards endorsement be helpful this week? In fact, could this be the last week it's still helpful to Clinton? 

*** On the trail: Elsewhere today, Clinton speaks to the Newspaper Association of America in DC; McCain, in Pennsylvania, holds a media avail at Villanova University before appearing on MSNBC’s Hardball; and Obama addresses the Building Trades Legislative Conference in DC and his interview on HBO’s Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel airs at 10:00 pm ET. Also, Michelle Obama stumps in Pennsylvania.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 7 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 21 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 203 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 280 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I didn't think I would ever say this, but if she wins the Dem nomination, I am voting for McCain.
The only solution for democrats is to tax people higher and just make people as miserable as possible.  That has always been the liberal way of dealing with problems.  John McCain is not the brightest bulb in the socket when it comes to economics, but at least he will let people keep their money.  Obama and The Clinton's think that raising people's taxes and let them feel as miserable as they can is not the answer.  I cannot figure out how The Clinton's had so much earmark money given to New YorkState and still they cannot transform them into jobs.  Once again, the Clinton's lie about the fact that they can make jobs appear magically when they have not even done so in New York state.

Hillary Clinton
A Liar for all Seasons
So Clinton is going for the kill over Obama's "bitter" remark, eh? This could come back to haunt her as most people I've talked to think it's just another feeble attempt on her part. Most people I've talked to say, yes, they ARE bitter over gas prices and they don't think anyone in politics is listening to them; afterall 80% of the people are AGAINST the Iraq war and yet we're told over and over again that the "surge" is working and we will probably have to be there for the next decade. It will be intersting to see how PA goes; from the sounds of it, they won't be voting on the "bitter" issue, For most of them it's purly black and white.
"Wouldn't an Edwards endorsement be helpful this week? In fact, could this be the last week it's still helpful to Clinton?"
**************************************************
Maybe.  However, I don't think that Edwards is going to endorse at all.  I think that if he was going to endorse anybody, he would have done so by now.

What about Al Gore - particularly with Hillary throwing him under the proverbial with her comments about elitism?

http://thepajamapundit.com/
OK, big John spending and tax cutter...you've done the easy part, cutting rich peoples taxes now please turn to America and tell us exactly which programs you will cut...be specific now, we are tired of the 'waste' and 'pork' storyline because frankly if you cut 100% of both you've done nothing to improve the economy of the US or made a dent in the deficit or debt...tell us all which programs you will cut
If John Edwards endorses Hillary Clinton after building his entire campaign against special interest money, he will cement a legacy of opportunism and millions of Americans will laugh when they hear his name.  Not only will he be backing a losing candidate, he will also forever be seen as the guy who says one thing and does another.  At least in that way, he would be like the Clintons.
"He misspoke but he didn't lie".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is how Hillary Clinton should have handled the whole "bitter" controversy. But no. She has to go out and quite possibly lose the state of PA for Senator Obama in November.

She really and truly has no class. Just like her husband when he was in the White House.

Once again, Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow - you both consistently refuse to be a part of the mob mentality we see all over tv. Without either of you I swear I would have to come to the conclusion that the commentators we listen to on a daily basis were all nothing but a bunch of fools, unable to think for themselves.

Which as we all know is dangerous.

To the voters: And now the Republicans are trying to tell us that they know how to connect with working class people.

They're lying. And if you don't know that by now, you never will.
Me thinks that Senator Clinton is gonna need to keep that shot glass nearby next Tuesday . . . the good folks of Pennsylvania might not look too kindly on the Queen of the Liberal Elites pretending like she's the daughter of a share cropper . . . her "common folk" routine this week makes that Bosnia story seem like Masterpiece Theater . . .
I love the web ad.  So simple, and comical.  I am an avid Obama supporter.  I don't believe Obama is perfect but she is shameful.  I wonder if she can help herself.  She doesn't really have a good role model at home.  She is so desperate because this is her last chance to be President.  In eight years, she will be near 70.  If McCain can't do it at age 70ish, she can't either.  

Shady lady.  

I wish this primary season were over so we could focus on the real differences between the Democratic and Republican nominees.  
Regarding the Quinnipiac poll:  is it possible, just possible, that this entire story has been built on the media ELITE and Senator Clinton condescendingly commanding small town voters how they must think and that they must be outraged?  The AP ran an enlightening story yesterday based on interviews it did across Pennsylvania.  Guess what?  Pennsylvanians are a whole lot more level-headed than the junior Senator from New York.  She's outraged, OUTRAGED.  They look at Obama's comments, understand them in context and say, "yes, he could have spoken better.  and yes, we aren't particularly excited about a lot of our jobs being shipped overseas."
So John have you finished your book on economics for dummies?

Who did you get to write a good pander to em economy plan?
Now study hard b/c you can hardly remember anything in these your golden years.
Dontcha just love all the old people cliches John.
Hmmmmm...have others out there picked up on this timeline?

Sunday, 4/6: Obama makes his remarks.

Friday, 4/11 (nearly a whole week later): the press picks up on them.

4/11-now: Hillary slams Barack daily on his words.

Saturday, 4/12: "I am not bitter" stickers are distributed by the Clinton campaign

Monday, 4/14: Clinton comes out with a TV ad.

So, maybe it isn't unreasonable to believe that the Clinton camp can create a tv ad in a weekend.  But, am I to believe that there is an overnight sticker press and distributer?  Give me a break!

Clinton was sitting on these remarks, prepping the elaborate response, and then feigning fury in order to rile up the Penns.  THAT is what I call politics as usual.  THAT is what I call condescension.  THAT is why Americans are bitter.

We are bitter because politicians like Hillary only pretend to care when it's politically convenient.  I'm sure she cares more about her $800,000 for the Columbian trade deal than about steel workers.  I'm sure she cares more about her wink-wink-nod-nod to Canada and all that goes with it than about factory workers.  I'm sure she cares more about her lobbyist and PAC's interests than about the average duck-hunter or Christian's dinner table.

I'm sure she cares more about herself than us.
Someone please explain to me how you can constantly say lower taxes, less government, and at the same time expect to grow the military and continue to fund our troops.  It seems like a logical infallacy to me.
My feeling is that if the comments were to hurt him it would have been reflected in this new poll.  These are the type of comments that could elicit an instant kneejerk negative reaction.  They are not the type of comments that one needs to let set in before making a judgement. If they are instead considered thoughtfully or even ring true I think it will help Obama, especially with Clinton seriously overplaying her hand with her new attack ad. Pennsylvanians are not stupid
By politicians exploiting the wedge, he meant to say Hillary and Bill and their supporters
Edwards would be a fool to endorse Clinton at this point.  What could he possibly gain?  She has already lost the nomination and the respect of most party leaders.  Do you actually think he would want to embrace that?
Hillary Clinton can beat McCain. Obama cannot.  It's a simple fact the Obamabots can grasp because they've sipped too much Kool Aide and have been hypmotized by the Obamarama himself.
This ad looks like a Mark Penn ad to me.  
Yes McCain has an "econ challenge" in this campaign. But even more importantly he is COGNITIVELY CHALLENGED!! And no that's not a personal attack, thats a PLEA in defense of Americans. We deserve a leader who can THINK and solve some serious problems, not YET ANOTHER leader who is a puppet for the corporate greed of the "regressive" party.
Yes We Can!
Obama '08

I'd cling to these values...

Luke 6: 28
  Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.

Matt. 5: 44
  But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

"..the torch has been passed to a new generations of
Americans....Ask not what your country can do for you...
Ask what you can do for your country"---JFK..

Barack knows his mission. We'll all pray for both our candidates..That they do honor and find justice for the good of all the American people...
For a guy who made a big thing out of lapel flag pins not being a sign of patiotism well what is a flag draped podium and flags all around can obamma say IM AN ALL AMERICAN  
In terms of "Going for the kill", good observation but I have a question for you.  Since when has Clinton listened to the superdelegates?  They have been telling her to tone it down for how many weeks...what makes you think they will listen after PA no matter what the result.

And thanks for pointing out that they are truly in their own league with their negative campaigning.  It appears to me that this is a watershed moment in American politics.  Do you want to see more of this (horrific campaigning) VOTE CLINTON.  Are you repulsed by this kind of campaigning DON'T VOTE FOR CLINTON.  It seems to me at this point that a vote for her just sends the message that you find her way of campaigning acceptable.  No ends justify these means (and its not even that her "end" is that good).

Never, not in a million years, would I vote for her.  Sorry to my fellow Dems, I reached my tipping point on her weeks ago.  Notice, I'm apologizing...not her.  Business as usual.

Obama 08
I think "McCain's Economic WALL" would be a better post title...


Obviously Hillary (and the ignorant elitist media) jumped the ship a bit on the "bitter" comment.  Why Hillary (and the ignorant elitist media) felt like THEY have some deep connection with small-town voters in PA is beyond me, seeing as how the talking heads on the news are wearing suits more expensive than most of these small-town folks cars, and seeing as how Hillary Clinton has been followed by secret service for the past twenty years, she obviously has no idea.  She went for the political gotcha-moment, and was too busy basking in her own self-indulgent aura to realize, you know what, a lot of small town folks really ARE bitter.  They're crazy mad and crazy bitter about the government and about tactical politicians.  That's what Obama was saying, these small town folks aren't stupid.  They understood it.  But Hillary didn't.  She played tactical politician, swung back a shot of Canadian whiskey (no Kentucky or Tennessee bourbon for that lass), and she's trying to command these small town folks to think their lives are just fantastic!
You are bitter well what will hope do for you NOYHING enjoy your new politics it is the same as the old you have been had!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!UP WITH ANGER and BITTERNESS DOWN WITH HOPE
I'm from a small town in PA. My family hunts and we go to church. And you know what, we don't need a lady like Hillary Clinton to tell us how to feel about anything. We'll all be voting for Barack Obama in the primary. The man may not have spoken as well as he could have but he didn't have the nerve to tell me how I feel and take up for me to win something he hasn't earned.
McCain's beer baroness wife stole some recipes from the Food Network and she calls them her own on the McCain.  It seems like small potatoEs but ordinary Americans don't do this crap.  Let's see how fait the main stream media is in our country.  Will they cover this news?  Here's a link to the story with pictures of the exact same recipes on the two web sites...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-weiner/mccain-family-recipes-lif_b_96666.html
All you demorats are shameful obamma and hilliary what makes him so different. SYNTAX OBAMMA said he used the wrong SYNTAX thats like bill clinton saying what it means, will IT still mean IT when obbama gets done explaining BIRDS OF A FEATHER HILLIARY AND OBBAMMA
Edwards (whom I supported) has had ample opportunities to endorse Clinton and he hasn't.  Not saying he won't.  But I find its interesting that he hasn't already.

I have already stated on a number of occasions why I think Obama is better for Edwards' supporters.  The shorthand is Clinton is more of the "same".  And we, the struggling middle class, obviously need something else because the "same" hasn't been working.  Not to mention, she's just not electable.  So its really asking us middle class if we think McCain's our man and I don't think we do.

Obama 08
I would vote for Al Sharpton before I vote for the snake Obama.  At least with Sharpton you know were he stands while Obama will tell you what you want to hear.  I will not follow this snake down his hole.
Dont worry Im sure alot of demorats will vote for MACAIN now republiucans might get tierd of OBAMMA BLAMING them for all the worlds problems this is a two party system,UNITER Obamma talks from both sides of his mouth,talk about saying anything to get elected how about bowling?
Ralph Nader is lookin' better and better.
j fl: you might want to talk to one of the intelligent thoughtful women who has decided that she cannot support a candidate who lies about her resume and who has courageously chosen to support Obama (I say courageously because women who support Obama are constantly attacked by people like you for being "turncoats and traitors").  You might then realize that there's no honor in flacking for your "girl" just because she's a female.  As you know, strong women think for themselves and look at the reality.
This would be the perfect time for Edwards to endorse Hillary. We need to keep this thing going, give people more time to find out what a mistake Obama really is.
Ever notice how Obama supporters "hawk" the board and are always first to post in The "First Thoughts" thread?
Hmmm, me-thinks paid political operatives are all around us.
More BS from the mccain BS express.
Pat Hungtington, won't it bother you if I say the truth that you are an idiot and a victim of propaganda? You seem to rally behind Hilliar NO matter the level of stupidity and arrogance in her actions and statements. Someone posted that she said almost the same things as Obama.
Chuck,
Here are the Clinton's own similar comments:
If voters want to avoid being labeled hypocrites and if they believe Obama is the one who is arrogant and elitist, in an article on Time.com, Hillary was quoted as saying:
"During the 1990s,
I cannot remember being asked about immigration. Why? Because the economy was working.
And average Americans didn't have to go around looking for others to blame" (does she think Americans blame their problems on scapegoats?)
Bill Clinton was also quoted as saying (repeatedly):
"The reason (George H. W. Bush's tactic) works so well now is that you have all these
economically insecure white people who are scared to death."
Bill's was reported by the Los Angels Times and Hillary's by the NY Sun.
Just like the Iraq War, the working class are once again being exploited - only this time by the Clinton machine. Once again they are being used for political purposes. Business as usual.

I do hope everyone is right - which is that the voters in PA recognize this for what it is.
__________
nashville_fan - too funny. I literally laughed out loud.
[[But McCain does have three things working in his favor: 1) his name isn’t George W. Bush; 2) he’s a budget hawk; and 3) he has time to strengthen his economic credentials ]]

You forgot #4: the media tries to downplay McCain's disturbing statements and actions as quickly as they can. If Obama had accused Shiite Iran of training Sunni Al Qaeda, the media would have gone into a feeding frenzy for weeks. They'd be opining endlessly about how this indicated that Obama was too inexperienced to be trusted with foreign policy.

But since all the clever pundits "know" that McCain's foreign policy expertise is "beyond question" as one of them put it on CNN, McCain's disturbing ignorance was quickly swept under the carpet. The corporate media is trying to saddle the country with a "foreign policy expert" McCain who doesn't know anything about foreigners except which ones he wants to bomb. #4 is definitely the best thing McCain has got going for him.
I'm really beginning to think that Obama doesn't need the democratic nomination. He can raise copious amounts of cash, He could run as a third party populist candidate and beat both Clinton and McCain. He would win the plurality of the votes in enough states to win in the electoral college.
Wow...if those folks in the ad were truly insulted I guess they prefer untruth to truth....but then on the other hand I think those same people were in the infomercial audience for "thighmaster" or was it "buns of steel"? You know things are economicaly tough when you allow yourself to be seen around the world playing to Hillary's pandering.  Too bad, they seemed like nice people but I guess you get what you get when you "cling" to Hillary.
I was a fervent Edwards supporter and would be immeasurably dissapointed if he endorses Clinton, who embodies the old Washington corrupted establishment and  everything he stands against.  I could care less about her "poverty platform"-it would have no resonance or meaning to her and would be politics as usual.
On a happier note-I think Biden would be an excellent VP candidate
HilLIEry needs to get the message that the people were trying to give her yesterday during her speech-- we are all tired of the lies, the negativity and the pretending to be something she is not.  The shot and beer theater was the last straw!  Who actually believes that she has ever hung out in a blue-collar bar, throwing back shots with the "working people"?  What an insult to all of us that work for our paychecks!  Okay, so now I am BITTER!  Thanks Hill for making Obama look like our only hope.


Obama 08
"Hillary Clinton can beat McCain. Obama cannot.  It's a simple fact the Obamabots can grasp because they've sipped too much Kool Aide and have been hypmotized by the Obamarama himself" Pat Huninton

Do you need to have the difference between assertion and simple fact emplained? What you are doing is making an assertion without any logical backup.. A fact can be proved, and your dismissal of 15 Million Obama voters support for Obama based on "Drinking Cool Aide" and "being hypnotised" is obviously the ranting of someone who prefers to take comfort in opinion without the discomfort of thought..
Pat, in New York, keep on living in LALALAND.America is sending your beloved senator back to you.We don't need No condescending Elitist with a bankroll of 109 million, telling Us we're Not bitter.You & J.Merle (wherever he is these days)can start her reelction campaign. She's gonna need all the help she can get after her performance in the Primary's.It's really comical that her disallusioned supporter's can actually say that there OK with the status quo in America.I bet all of you smile real big when you pay the clerk's with a $50 bill after filling up your vehicle.I'm also sure that when paying your grocery bill, you just cackle at the rising cost of Food.No doubt , you get Hysterical laughing at your latest Insurance payment. I know I do!

All this makes me wanna do is laugh at the Stupidity of voter's who think Hillary gives a DAMN about them!
Who need's the Comedy channel, when you can come here & laugh at the Stupidity & Ignorance of some American's
Here's the Democratic problem:  While McCain sits back and takes his time to prepare for November, Obama doesn't even have time to identify a running mate who will balance his age, ideology, etc.  If she stays in through the convention, he'll be scrambling and will be lucky to come up with Dan Quayle.  Here's how it should be working:
http://digits.hrblock.com/ssDigits/digits.php?rType=1&sPath=1140&sNode=1140&uId=198
Let the candidates take their case before the delegates and the nation, at the convention in Denver.
Let the nation see what they both stand for, and we can make an intelligent, informed decision based upon their LIVE presentations.
It's the only fair thing to do.
Especially since Michigan's, and Florida's Democratic voters are being pre-empted and excluded from the nominating process by a technicality created, in part, by the G.O.P.
If one candidate or the other doesn't have the necessary 2025 delegates, then the rules call for a brokered convention. It would be riviting, political theater, and it would show the nation that Democrats can take care of their problems, their conflicts and their controversies in a fair, and reasonable manner.
Unless of course, somebody plans to throw a temper tantrum, and cause property damage, and/or physical harm to someone if they don't get their own freakin' way. Which is what Obama's supporters are tacitly threatening.
B. Johnson in PA, I've been saying the same thing since this hit.  I have family and friends in PA and the most amazing thing about this whole fiasco is what you pointed out: Pennsylvanians aren't interested in having a $100 million Yale grad telling them when they should and should not be outraged about some sleight.    It's the ultimate in condescension for Hillary and the Manhattan media elite to tell small town Pennsylvanians how they MUST think.  
Well i'm a 34 yr old single white male that makes 63k per year, i'm a self employed and considered "Rich" by the democrats, I just cut a check to the government for 19k for my federal taxes alone, I pay for my own health insurance, paid my own way through college and have a 401k and retirement savings.  I don't need or want government assistance, I just want more of my own money.  I don't want a 45% or 50% tax rate for nationalized health insurance, I pay for my own and it's not right to steal more of my money to pay for those who don't work, that simply is not my problem.  But it looks like the dems will be choosing Obama, who is easily beatable by McCain....
It doesn't matter how much old "Bomb Iran" McCain hones his economic message as long as he support the American occupation of Iraq.  It's breaking this country...there's no up side.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=891683

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google