ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



First thoughts: Obama's tough night

Posted: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:05 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: ,

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Obama’s tough night: Last night wasn’t a good debate for Obama. Period. But it wasn't a great debate for Clinton either. Of course, that may not matter to her campaign -- in a two-way debate, it's not about which candidate narrowly wins, but which candidate gets pummeled in the post-debate reviews. And Obama is getting pummeled because, well, he did get pummeled, a bit by Clinton and a little bit by the moderators. In the first 40 minutes of the debate, most of the questions were focused on Obama's negatives (except for a lone Bosnia-sniper question to Clinton, with no follow up) and that's what helped create what was a near disastrous performance for the front-runner. Obama was weak in a lot of his answers on his personal negatives. (Did he really compare Tom Coburn to a one-time '60s radical/terrorist?) Meanwhile, Clinton piled on, particularly (and surprisingly, actually) on Bill Ayers, the former '60s radical who has tenuous ties to Obama. We’re not sure if Clinton's piling on ever is good for her in the long run -- see her current poll standing -- it created some post-debate issues for Obama. Many news organizations will feel compelled to do Ayers stories in the next few days (and they already have). While some may question the fairness and relevancy of the Ayers issue, it's not going to be good for Obama.
 
*** Backlash? This debate is going to lead a lot of Obama supporters to ratchet up the calls on Clinton to either withdraw or tone down the attacks. Clinton supporters will point to this debate as proof that he's not yet ready for the general, that's why she should stay in, and that's why superdelegates should overturn the winner of pledged delegates. Still, Obama supporters -- and probably some neutral Democrats, too -- are going to be livid at how damaging this debate was to both of them. And the calls for getting the primary over with are going to rise. Indeed, per an aide, the Obama campaign is going to try to seize on last night’s negativity by announcing the support of Pennsylvania voters “who have switched their allegiance from Clinton to Obama, largely because of her negativity.”

VIDEO: NBC Deputy Political Director Mark Murray gives a post-game analysis of last night's debate and looks ahead at the approaching Pennsylvania primary.

*** Where we go from here: Overall, with the spotlight on him very bright, Obama didn't step up. He got rattled early on and never picked his game back up. Clinton wasn't very warm (outside of he first few minutes), but she didn't have the spotlight on her very bright. And as we've noted here quite a few times, whenever the spotlight is on one candidate, the other seems to benefit. Last night, the spotlight was on Obama, and for a short period of time, expect Clinton to benefit. But the question is whether she can sustain any benefit since as the negativity goes on, she pays a bigger price than Obama. Let's see what Pennsylvania decides in five days. A big Clinton victory and this debate will be seen as an important turning point. But a narrow victory (less than five points) and she could find herself facing more calls to get out.

*** Two other takeaways: Could last night’s true winner be John McCain? That appears to be the scoring by quite a few pundits. One other thing, and you can take this to the bank: that was the final debate of the primary season. The Obama folks still control the debate schedule and until they don't, don't count on more debates. The control could change, but not before May 6.

*** The delegate count: Obama picked up an Oklahoma superdelegate, add-on Reggie Whitten. Clinton now leads in superdelegates 257-235. Since Sunday, Obama has picked up five supers to Clinton’s zero. With his three elected superdelegate pick-ups yesterday, Obama has moved past Clinton among the group (U.S. Senators, Reps and governors): 96-94. In the overall count now, Obama leads by 142 (1,651-1,509). He has a 164 pledged-delegate lead (1,416-1,252).

*** Flash Gordon: All three presidential candidates meet with British PM Gordon Brown at the British embassy in DC today. Obama goes at 9:00 am ET, McCain goes at 10:00 am ET, and Clinton goes at 11:00 am ET. Why do we have visions of the three presidential candidates all waiting in the waiting area -- like at the doctor’s or dentist’s office? Per NBC’s John Yang, Brown also meets with President Bush today and will hold a joint news conference (two questions from British reporters, two questions from the White House press corps).

*** On the trail: Elsewhere today, Clinton stops by Haverford College, tapes an appearance on Colbert, and attends a block party in Philly; Obama heads to North Carolina, stumping in Raleigh and Greenville; and Bill Clinton has a whopping six campaign events in Pennsylvania.

Countdown to Pennsylvania: 5 days
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 19 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 201 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 278 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Good job, Hillary! No scripted jokes and no direct vetting of Obama - let the moderators do it. Add in a smattering of your natural humour (loved the Dick Cheney sarcasm!)  and this was your best debate!

GO HILLARY!
Look, you play the hand you're dealt.  No whining.  I thought he played it ok.  But the fact that ABC used a question fed to them by Sean Hannity and then followed up with a patriotism question is inexcusable.  Good news for NBC?  A lot of people will no longer will be watching This Week with George.
The American media is largely the reason Americans are ignorant and easily swayed by emotions. Hopefully more Americans are waking up to this fact and demanding more accountability from the people they expect to do a good job. Judging people on trivialities that have no bearing on how they will govern is a mistake. Bill Clinton for all his flaws was agood president. George Bush was the 'compasionate' conservative and turned out to be the worst thing for this country. Americans beware!
Yep.  I was so ticked off at ABC.  Thanks.  A republican shouldn't be able to sell a free ride in this country, but that is what the media has given him.
That wasn't a debate...that was a Senator Clinton infomercial...Stephanopoulos appears to still be on the Clinton payroll.

50 minutes on negatives...I thought they were supposed to be debating issues and it turns out ABC just chose to pay them lip service at the end of the debate...

"Oh, by the way, the economy..."
The Saturday Night Live skit would be VERY appropriate now.  Perhaps they could have George telling Charlie, "Charlie, you continue taking a tire iron to Obama's knees while I run and get the brilliant wonder junior Senator from New York a beer and a shot."
When the pressure is on, Obama folds like a cheap chair. Obama would be nothing short of a puppet if he were in the White House, controlled both by Congress and special interest groups.
Don't kid yourselves - the media elite are so out of touch with the voters in this country. Case in point - ABC's debate last night.

Hillary Clinton is definitely out as far as being electable in November. That was clear not only last night but by the comments I'm reading this morning, as well as people I have talked with. Everyone is pretty angry and fed up with Hillary.

Now she will try and see to it that Barack Obama is not elected in November. Does she realize the damage she is doing to him? This is all inside the beltway stuff we witnessed last night.

If she had any class - any at all - she would campaign for Barack Obama in PA.

She's not going to get elected in November. Period.

I too saw that "Screw 'em" comment.

Notice Senator Obama didn't bring it up? However, if he had said "screw 'em", the moderators would have for sure mentioned it.

The media in this country could care less about the working class in this country who are about to cast a very important vote in PA on Tuesday. As usual, they were dismissed completely last night. And NOT by Barack Obama.

Kudo's to him for showing up at the debate knowing he was going to be questioned by a former Clinton aide. He never said a word.

Imagine that - it was more important for the moderators to ask a question that Sean Hannity wanted asked - instead of the questions voters in PA wanted asked.
Let's see...Hillary had the answers, was calm and composed, didn't get rattled, and was in control.  Obama hmmmed and hawed and never said anything of substance.  Let's vote substance over charisma...even if you don't like Hillary.  We voted for charm with Bush and look where it got us!  Go Hillary...it ain't over!
Clinton continues to act like she's in the tank for the Republicans.  I assume that, in four years, she believes that we'll look back on this election and say "Well, Democrats lost the fight because Hill wasn't the nominee." She fails to realize that we're actually going to say "Well, Democrats lost the fight because Hill was doing the Republicans' work for them during the primary and damaged Obama as much as she could."
How will people feel when Obama is elected to be president, and he gives the same ceremony to Rev. Wright as Bush has done for the Pope.
Pile it on folks. Look - the unaffiliated and uncommitted who tuned in last night will see it for what it was - a Former Clinton lackey (George S.) and an elitist (Charlie "teachers make more than $97k" Gibson) asking Q's about trivial items that almost all have been beat into the ground. These two were nothing more than tweedle dee and tweedle dum playing it up for the Queen so that she could find a chance to hatchet Obama. http://thedeadguy.com/?p=31
**************
Unfortunately...

A lot of what was said last evening regarding Sen. Obama's "associations" will be brought to bare come November if he is our nominee.

William Ayers hosted a fundraiser for Sen. Obama only a few years ago in support of his Senate campaign yet Mr. Ayers is an admitted "Terrorist" who was with a group who blew up..
The Pentagon
The US Capitol
Numerous police headquarters throughout the United States (resulting in 1 death).

Ya know, I am seriously beginning to wonder about his "Judgment" to actually lead this country.

Known association include:
Rev. Wright - Anti-American
Tony Resko - Curuption Charges
William Ayres - Admitted Terrorist !!

What next that will be brought to light... only time will tell... but America, is THIS the person you will chose to lead your country??

Unreal!
This debate will actually help Obama.  The media insiders and Washingtonians are so slow to catch on to why Obama is doing so well this campaign: he has been unrelenting in helping America to see that we can have a new kind of politics.  That travesty of a debate was so transparent last night.  It was clear that ABC had it in for Obama.  In a time of war and recession, the moderators spent the first hour on character assassination.
Chuck, you keep saying that last night was not good for Obama. Your opinion.... definatly not fact. I see it differently from here in my cookie baking world!
That debate (dare I call it that) was a hit job, and a joke on the american public. I don't care about flag pins or bosnia, I care about whether or not social security is still around when I retire, or whether my husband's employer will outsource yet more jobs and lay him off.  I think given the circumstances Obama did well, he showed he has the metal to stand up to whatever the republicans will throw at him in the general.
They were indeed intent on making it a tough night for Barack. He's not complaining. He answered everything with class. All the attention was on Barack, that's good for HIM. Hillary WAS given time to admit she LIED about her experience in Bosnia. She seemed to sort of say, well, you know, I lie once in a while...
I didn't know Chuck Todd was THAT opposed to Obama. The most interesting thing I find is how time tells the political tale. The subtext of this race seems to be bringing all that normally lies dormant to the light.

The "debate" illustrated this to the fullest. I would ask my fellow voters how does a flag pin make someone a better president? Why not an American ring or star spangled glasses?
I know there are a lot of people in this country, myself included, who would like to finally see a female president.  Germany has Angela Merkel.  England had Margaret Thatcher.  It is unfortunate that the first serious female candidate for president in this country had to be Hillary Clinton.  That is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.  We should be able to do better than that.

Keep it up, Hillary.  Keep criticizing Obama for alleged relationships with terrorists, when your husband pardoned terrorists on the last day of his term.  I'm sure no one will notice the hypocrisy.

Obama in 2008.  Integrity matters and the Clintons have none.
This will backfire on Clinton. Obama stood out as the ONLY one in that debate, moderators INCLUDED, that wanted to talk issues, ways to help the People. George and Charles were disgusting! Looking for a new job at the National Enquirer?
PA Voter (Sent Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:22 AM)

Bill Clinton pardoned two of those admitted terrorist!! So what ya say about that?
For the 1st time in 32 years of voting I crossed lines and voted democratic in the MO primary. After the latest discusting performance last night and the allowance of ABC to allow a Clinton operative to run what was supposed to be a debate it looks like I will be going back to the other side and WILL NEVER, EVER spend a single dime watching anything ABC produces...EVER!!
So let me get this straight - Senator Obama had a bad night because he focused on the issues, refused to pick all the low hanging fruit that is Senator Clinton's lies and conflicts of interest, and he became annoyed at having to reanswer questions about things that he has addressed AD NASEUM for weeks on end?

It is amazing how out of touch the American media is with the people who are forced to watch them preen and primp daily about their ridiculous "theories" - We want OUT OF IRAQ! We want FAIR TRADE! We want HEALTH CARE!  When is anybody gonna get that and quit telling us about the "Catholic vote" the "beer vote" and assorted other IRRELEVANT DRIVEL?

P.S. Why oh why does Chris Matthews say every night that Senator Obama doesn't seem comfortable "in a bar with 5 or 6 white guys"? Chris, please give me a break. Senator Obama has lived his ENTIRE LIFE with "white guys". We don't need your crackpot not-so-man-on-the-street opinions about Senator Obama's street cred with white people - we are smarter than that! Stick with politics - PLEASE!
One would think that National Enquirer moderated the debate.  So issues affecting real people we discussed.
FIRST READ TEAM: Your reporting on the debate is way off base and absolutely ridiculous! You must have watched a completely different debate. Why not commend Obama for withstanding literally 3 against 1 the entire night? Do you think the questions were fair? Was Hillary Clinton pressed on anything? And yet your conclusion was it was a bad night for Obama after he answered every question thrown at him? Maybe you guys should go apply for jobs at ABC, you'd fit right in with their tactics! I used to have respect for this blog, but I no longer. If it wasn't for Keith Olberman and Dan Abrams I'd stop watching MSNBC altogether, but I'll definitely turn the channel now if Chuck comes on...pathetic!
I thought it was supposed to be a debate.  Do we care about the issuess? Hillary at cutting down, again. What a waste of time. Obama should have passed on this debate (or what ever it was), they have debated enough.
How can the media elite be out of touch with such an elitist like Obama?
Dear Mr. Todd,

The public seems to have a very different impression than you did.  Your own MSNBC poll shows Obama winning.

Last night was not a debate it was a public Lynching, and Senator Obama held through the fire.  Last night will only make his candidacy stronger.  It is your duty to point out how little the REAL issues were addressed to the candidates and the failure of ABC news to add any substance to the campaign.  Both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama performed well in the evil funhouse, but Senator Obama wins because he didn't get tripped up.
Talking about last night,  Obama Look so down, Incompetents last night, it was a poor performance and again, Hillary show her ability to confront and do well,.  Are you talking about who is more able to confront McCain in November?  Don’t even think to say or hold the idea that Obama will do a better job than Hillary, it is impossible.  
Obama never can do good when he is confronted, he is good talking and talking and talking, but when is confronted with the fact, face to face, he look desperate, angry and uncomfortable, just like last night.
What's up NBC? Afraid to discuss openly how poor a job ABC did with this debate? The list of things a voter MIGHT be interested in but was ignored is huge. At least, the conflict of interest Stephanapoulos had should be mentioned. He worked for Bill Clinton (and, by inference from this campaign, Hillary Clinton as well).

Poor Jennings and Brinkley. Their successors have succeeded in completely besmirching the news reputations these two worked so hard for.

Yours is getting there as well. Please, a little honesty about the moderators.
As for Hillary 'piling on' Obama - she did not bring up the major topics - the moderators did.  Good debating technique is to take advantage and she did.  In the past she has not done this with the finesse she did last night. She was not shrill. She was not frustrated. The simply concurred with the moderators inferences and tweaked the info where it was lacking.  

I sense Geoff Garin is earning his paycheck.
Ad another super for Obama:

Breaking News: Thomas Backs Obama
You heard it here first. Council member and newly elected superdelegate Harry Thomas Jr., initially a supporter of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, is announcing in minutes that he will cast his vote at the Democratic National Convention in Denver for Sen. Barack Obama.

Thomas received more than 100 phone calls and e-mails from constituents who feared that he would use his power as a superdelegate to vote for Clinton despite the city's overwhelming support of Obama in the Potomac Primary.

"After meeting with the candidates and listening to my constituents, I have to honor the 83 percent who support Barack Obama," he said in an interview, referring to the results of the Democratic primary.

Thomas will make the announcement at 10 p.m. at a debate watch party.


Also,

Philadelphia Daily News endorses Obama
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20080417_VOTE_FOR_BARACK_OBAMA.html

Plus: The Obama campaign tells Stephanopoulos that “prominent Pennsylvania supporters” will switch their support from Clinton to Obama Thursday morning due to Clinton’s negativity.
http://thepage.time.com/2008/04/17/philadelphia-daily-news-endorses-obama/

One other point.  Obama would have handled this debate in a very different way if it had been against a Republican rather than a Democrat.  Unlike Hillary he does not want to do damage to the party.
Did last night convince anyone ?
Hillary was RELENTLESSLY NEGATIVE
She had nothing positive....

All Hillary has is cheap shots
Is THAT what you want in a nominee ?
A cheap shot artist with baggage a mile high ?

Hillary also failed the Commander in Cheif test ?

If Iran attacked ANYBODY in the Middle East she's committing us to 'massive retaliation' ?
HELLO ?
It sounds like NATO....
Except NATO members were democracies with populations glad to have US troops stationed in their countries.
Populations who regarded us as allies....

Just like .... SAUDI ARABIA !

Hillary is embedding us into the Middle East ?
IS this sabre rattling against Iran ?
Does she, like John McCain and Geroge Bush want a war with Iran ?
WHY ?
There's NO EXCUSE for another war !!
Let's finish up the wars we have now
Put the 'American Middle East Empire' back on the shelf for a while
Let's take care of issues at home

Hillary FAILS the 'Commander in Cheif' Test
She sounds like she's pandering to the neo-cons

Bye, bye Hill
You've got NOTHING TO SAY
(and you take so long to say it)
Mr. Stephanopoulos and Mrs. Clinton also referred to statements by Mr. Ayers in an article in The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2001, that Mrs. Clinton said were “deeply hurtful to people in New York.”

“I don’t regret setting bombs,” Mr. Ayers said then. “I feel we didn’t do enough.”

Mr. Ayers did not make the remarks after the attacks on the World Trade Center that day. The interview had been conducted earlier, in connection with a memoir that he had published, “Fugitive Days,” and he was referring to his experience in the Weather Underground.

After Mrs. Clinton criticized Mr. Obama for not severing all Ayers ties, Mr. Obama said, “By Senator Clinton’s own vetting standards, I don’t think she would make it, since President Clinton pardoned or commuted the sentences of two members of the Weather Underground.”

That referred to commutations by Mr. Clinton in January 2001, shortly before leaving office, for Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg. Ms. Evans had been convicted of weapons and explosives charges connected with eight bombings in the mid-’80s and sentenced to 40 years in prison. Ms. Rosenberg had been charged in connection with a 1981 armed robbery in which two police officers and a security guard were killed, and was serving 58 years after being convicted of weapons charges in a 1984 case.

How come charlie & george didn't tell the truth.

This is a great debate. Thank god, it was not hosted by NBC or CNN. Obama finally got real questions for which he should have had ready answers. Over the last year Barack Obama has gotten a complete pass on his record, his life and everything associated to his political rise. In fact, if Senator Obama had been subjected to the scrutiny that Hillary Clinton has been subjected to he would have turned to ash by now.

I don't think the debate did Hillary much good.  After all, she was forced to say that he was electable which is in direct contrast to what she has been saying to the superdelegates.  While I didn't think that Obama's performance was that great, except for the Ayres thing, I thought that the Wright exchange felt old.  We've heard the same question and explanation so many times that I don't think that anyone changed their minds on the issue once stated.  So basically, her supporters think she won and his supporters think he did fine.  Nothing new except a waste of 2 hours.  Wish I'd watched American Idol!
Voters again disserved by 'journalists'/media.  Disappointing.

Obama is totally my man and totally for the right reasons, but I tuned in only for last half and he definitely appeared to be 'finishing it out', leading me to wonder what had happened in first half; i.e., his demeanor was not one of having 'folded', but rather one of a person who is speaking but is sure that no one is listening, precisely the effect that only being able to look at these two hostile 'modertors' would be expected to have.  Poor format; 'debate', my ass.
It tickled me to know that Sean Hannity was behind the scripted questions attacking Obama last night.  Charlie Gibson, George Stepanopoulos and the Clintons were all in on it.  They had a prepared script (of which "Hillbilly" had a copy) and Obama's answers forced them to abandon the "script" they had feverently worked on to "set the brother up."  The Clintons have now opened their bedroom door and have climbed into bed with the Republican right wingers to keep Obama out of "their" White House.  This campaign is all about race, nothing more, nothing less.  So, America, don't complain that you're paying $4 a gallon at the pump, don't complaint about milk being $5 a gallon, don't complain about your sons and daughters dying in Iraq, don't complain about America being hated on the world stage.  It was and is CERTAIN elite members of white America that have run this nation into the ground.  Whether Obama wins or loses, it was just thrilling to see Obama take on Gibson, Stephanopoulos and the Clintons in a 4 on 1 scripted contest and he held his own.  Did you see the look in their eyes?  Did you see Gibson's hands literally shaking with his scripted card in his hand at the end of the debate?  Did you see the hurt in Chelsea's eyes and the anger in Rendell's eyes?  As an ordiinary citizen, Obama delivered a knock out punch last night and pulled the veil off the evil conspiracy to keep him out of the White House and to bring change for all of America.  The morning polls shows that ordinary citizens have no doubt that Obama plummeted Clinton last night.  God Bless You, Obama.  My prayers are with you.  
Dear Mr. Todd -

You have missed the entire point of the debate - the total lack of serious journalistic integrity or skill on the part of the moderators.
Wake Up!! Did you watch the same debate the American public did last night? Have you seen the abc news website now more than 12,000 complaints about the debate.

Americans want to know about issues and policy positions - not gossip and inneundo.

You should make a list of the questions asked- they were ridiculous:

Do you think your pastor loves his country?
Why don't you wear a flag lapel?

compare these questions to ones asked by Walter Cronkite in earlier Presidential debates
This was shameful.  This is exactly how we wound up with Bush/Cheney for 8 years.  I have always liked Charlie and George, but to talk about flag pins instead of why our soldiers are dying in a Civil War in Iraq leaves me speechless.

If we voters allow this election to spin out of control again and not be about substance instead of emotion, we will get exactly the govt we deserve. Just like last time.

Let ABC know what you think, and switch over to another news channel.  That is exactly what I plan on doing tonight.
Oh of course, men can NEVER, EVER say that a FEMALE actually ran circles around a MAN! God forbid if anyone even breathes that truth. The gender related truth is that, as a woman, she must do %100 better than him, otherwise she gets no credit whatsoever. Welcome to the mans world folks. As females, we are damned if we do and damned if we don't. She OBVIOUSLY kicked butt Chuck....shhhhhh..you can't say it though.
It's about time Obama faced some tough questioning, instead of the usual; "are you comfortable Senator Obama, can we get you a pillow and a cold drink?"
Hear Hear for ABC News!...at least THEY have some integrity....unlike SOME "newsmen" I know. (Do you get it, Chucky, Markie, and Little Dom-Dom?)
Poor little Obama,  they picked on me.  Without a smooth talking prepared script  he don't do so good.  He is showing  to more people now what we knew all along, he ain't presidential material.
All this corruption is now showing up in Obama's past. We knew the Clinton's were corrupt, but now we're seeing the man the advocates 'Change' is just as corrupt. Biden was wrong, Barack is not a 'clean candidate', and appears to be every bit as corrupt and Bill and Hillary.
I simply do not understand punditry.  She admitted to lying and "...stating things I knew were not true..." and she gets a pass?  I think we have had almost sixteen years of presidential lies.  How on earth is this race even close.  He was cool headed under 'fire' and she seemed shrill and petulant.  Come on Todd, your analysis is usually better than this.  I do not see myself, a staunch Democrat, closing ranks behind Clinton.  I will stay home or organize a grass roots campaign for a write in candidate.  I am so over this race, it is ridiculous.
Senator Obama is the one who tried to remember, that as the one ahead, he had a responsibility to try to keep the party together.  If he is not the nominee, I will remove myself from the democratic list.  I'm so happy to know that I never have to vote for clinton, because I never will.  She is an embarrasement to the democratic party.
All the Obama supporters are upset that their candidate is being exposed for what he is. The truth hurts, doesn't it? All of Obama's fans are becoming bitter and angry people. That's good news for churches and gun shops, but bad news for Barack.
An hour on campaign gaffes and weak "negative" associations... and health care, the economy, all the other issues that -really- matter got bypassed.

Obama didn't lose.  The American People lost.
Funny how the people's comments here mostly think Obama did very well in the "debate". Pundits, you don't really have a clue, do you? We are tired of the character assassination circus. Obama was upset the issues weren't being debated, and he wasn't the only one.
I hope Russert and Williams were watching last night.
THAT is how a debate should be conducted.
Tough questions for both candidates. Not puff-ball for one, and slash-attack towards the other.
Great job by ABC!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=907930

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google