ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Battle for Pennsylvania: One day to go

Posted: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:10 AM by Domenico Montanaro

In addition to the MSNBC/McClatchy/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette poll, which has Clinton up by five over Obama (48%-43%), there are two other surveys out. Quinnipiac has Clinton leading by seven points (51%-44%), and Suffolk University has her up by 10 points (52%-42%). 

The New York Times: "Obama sharpened his tone against Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday as the six-week Pennsylvania primary contest raced to a close, with the rivals marshaling extensive resources in a battle for undecided voters and delegates that could determine whether the Democratic nominating fight carries on." More: "The intensity of Mr. Obama’s campaign and his willingness to air negative attacks in recent days suggest he harbored hope of ending the Clinton campaign here or avoiding a major loss that would keep the race alive."

And attention 2008 history book writers: "Neil Oxman, a media consultant here, estimated that by the end of the six-week campaign, Mr. Obama will have spent more than $9 million on television and Mrs. Clinton will have spent almost $4 million.

The Washington Post has similar piece: "The volleying in the final hours reflected the high stakes in Tuesday's contest. Clinton is favored to win, but the senator from New York may still face renewed pressure to end her candidacy unless she rolls up a sizable margin in the popular vote and significant gains in the overall delegate count. As the candidates jostled with one another, their advisers mounted a final effort to shape expectations for what will constitute victory on Tuesday. The Pennsylvania race has forced Obama to rewrite his script from earlier contests, with the result being a more aggressive tone and style in the final hours of this campaign than had been the case in previous states. Far more than at any other time in the campaign, Obama has applied pressure to Clinton, both on the stump and in his increasingly negative advertising.

The Boston Globe: “The exchange highlighted a sharp negative turn in the Democratic presidential campaign before tomorrow's primary in Pennsylvania, where some recent polls have shown Clinton's lead shrinking to single digits.”

Per NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones, Clinton yesterday criticized Obama for what she described as his compliments for John McCain. "Sen. Obama said today that John McCain would be better for the country than George Bush," she said. "Now, Sen. McCain is a real American patriot who has served our country with distinction, but Sen. McCain would follow the same failed policies that have been so wrong for our country the last seven years."

Clinton then did something she does often. She asked the audience a series of questions in a shout-and-response style we've seen many times before, starting Iowa with "Are you ready for a president who..." and more recently "Who will you hire to..." The exercise revs up the crowd, as it did today. "Sen. McCain thinks it's okay to keep our troops in Iraq for the next 100 years. Is that better than George Bush?" she asked eliciting a big “No!” from the audience. "Sen. McCain will continue the failed economic policies of George Bush that have brought us deficit and increasing debt. Is that better than George Bush? (Crowd: No!) Sen. McCain does not have a health-care plan that will cover every American. In fact, we will have more and more uninsured Americans. Is that better than George Bush? (Crowd: No!) Sen. McCain has no plans to end the housing foreclosure crisis or cut the cost of gas at the pump. Is that better than George Bush? (Crowd: No!) We need a nominee who will take on John McCain, not cheer on John McCain, and I will be that nominee."

Of course, Clinton herself complimented McCain a few weeks ago when she said that McCain had passed the commander-in-chief test -- as had she -- but that Obama had just given one speech. Bill Clinton also has praised McCain on the stump.

The New York Daily News: “Many observers believe Clinton has to do decisively well in Pennsylvania to keep party insiders from backing her rival, Barack Obama, and pushing her to drop out of the contest. Clinton needs ‘blowout numbers,’ says Peter Fenn, a Democratic consultant who isn't affiliated with either campaign.”

And watch those late deciders. “If the pattern of previous primaries and caucuses holds, the biggest procrastinators -- those who make up their minds on Tuesday -- will probably break for Senator Hillary Clinton. If they side with her again in Pennsylvania, it may help Clinton hold off Senator Barack Obama with a big-enough victory to save her candidacy, again.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The Youth vote and those over 200,000 new voters are not among the 'likely voters' polled by traditional methods...  We'll see how it breaks...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ojuupmnvmw

Obama'08
All you freakaziod cult members of the Obama camp just don't get it. A huge majority of us Hillary supporters will NEVER vote for Obama and/or will be voting for McCain. Sorry,but we dislike the extremes of BOTH partys.

Obama's national poll drop may reflect the effectiveness of Hillary’s campaigning and the recent debate. This would be a shame given that the recent Pennsylvania “debate” was not a debate. It was an ambush and I think Barack did amazingly well considering what he was up against. The evening was choreographed to help Clinton. Barack was treated condescendingly by the moderators. The only “negative” questions Hillary received were ones that she wanted. She wanted to raise again the question of Barack’s electablity. She wanted a chance to “win back” voters disappointed by the Bosnea story. Her demeanor was smug and very different from previous debates gving one the impression that she was part of the planning and knew exactly the “questions” planned. The camera frequently focused on Chelsea and Clinton supporters during the “debate”. The only commentator at the end was negative about Barrack leaving just the question Hillary wants the superdelegates to worry about. I am not generally one to accept conspiracy theories but this “debate” for me was over the top and I don’t doubt at all Hillary was central in planning its choreography.” It this “debate” is responsible for the change in the polls in Clinton’s favor, it will be a sad day for the democratic party.

Obama's national poll drop may reflect the effectiveness of Hillary’s campaigning and the recent debate. This would be a shame given that the recent Pennsylvania “debate” was not a debate. It was an ambush and I think Barack did amazingly well considering what he was up against. The evening was choreographed to help Clinton. Barack was treated condescendingly by the moderators. The only “negative” questions Hillary received were ones that she wanted. She wanted to raise again the question of Barack’s electablity. She wanted a chance to “win back” voters disappointed by the Bosnea story. Her demeanor was smug and very different from previous debates gving one the impression that she was part of the planning and knew exactly the “questions” planned. The camera frequently focused on Chelsea and Clinton supporters during the “debate”. The only commentator at the end was negative about Barrack leaving just the question Hillary wants the superdelegates to worry about. I am not generally one to accept conspiracy theories but this “debate” for me was over the top and I don’t doubt at all Hillary was central in planning its choreography.” It this “debate” is responsible for the change in the polls in Clinton’s favor, it will be a sad day for the democratic party.
Responding to negative campaigning from the oponent is not "Negative", it is positive.

That's all for now...
Gotta go donate more money for Barack's Campaign!!
Joan chicago il (Sent Monday, April 21, 2008 9:54 AM)

And your point is what?  Are we to say Obama is responsible for the blogs other post?  This makes no sense.  Being a frequent poster, it is not just democrats on this blog.  

If you actually pay attention to most of the jargon of the bloggers; many are republicans. Although, not to excuse the bloggers, but there are many who just do not support Hillary.  

There are too many issues with her, too many questions about her positions, such as she is against NAFTA, but records show she was a supporter.  

CAFTA, she says she is against it, but former Pres. Clinton lobbied for it, her chief strategist also lobbied for it.  She didn't fire him, she changed seats; nothing else.

How on earth do you lie about sniper fire, when your child is there?  

How do you live in the WH with as much reign as she had at that time and not get health care accomplished?  The problem is the republicans despise her and we see old fights hashed out and nothing again getting done.  She is not bringing anything, but baggage and the American people deserve much better.        
This is crazy... First, people are saying Obama shows weakness because he does not attack Hillary on her baggage, how would he look up against McCain?... Then when he does attack her, you blame him on attacking her and not being the person he says he is. The man cannot win with you people.
Hillary 2008 Obama still wet behind the ears Obama is not a Black man why does everyone think he is or would be the First Black American he is half white half black get real I am sick of hearing how he claims her grew up he don't know what poor is!
To all the idiots like Carol in CA - Obama does not WANT to run a negative campaign, he has been FORCED to do so. If not for Clintons' win at any cost (including the destruction of the democratic party) strategy, Obama would not be forced to attack back. He has never been the first to attack but he would be foolish to allow attacks on him to go unanswered because the American people are not smart enough to understand that his attempt to take the high road and NOT answer is NOT weakness. Thus he has to show strength in a manner that he is not happy with but, sadly, is the only way most people understand. As a white middle aged man I am going on record that if Hilary Clinton lies and attacks her way to the nomination I will work for and vote for McCain in November. McCain scares me but Hilary repulses me.
You guys missed this poll showing a 3 point Obama lead...

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_042108.pdf

To be fair you need to report on this.
GO OBAMA!
Kay, NY
J, FL
anne, PA
Wendell Klansaucer, East River, PA

Just a few of the people I was talking about. Just not smart enough to understand. In fact, the fact that ANYONE can possibly be fooled by Clintons lies illustrates the woeful state of our education system in this country.
All of you who have harped on Obama's comebacks against negative ads negative debates, and egative surrogates-----you are missing the point entirely.  He is doing PUSHBACK folks. When Kerry sat by and let it happen to him, look at the result.  If his opponents are going to the gutter with this hashed and rehashed stuff, he has to get down into the gutter with 'em in order to be able to point the way up for 'em.  There may be shades of poltics as usual with this, but I'm here to say that it is still a damn sight better than the same ole same ole we are barraged with day after day.  We can change, but it ain't going to be overnight----even the most staunch Democrat surely must know that.
there is a difference between stating negative facts and   slinging mud.

The more i read and hear, i think i'd like to vote for "none of the above". depressing isn't it?
trisha, hendersonville, nc
The Devil is not without his charms...


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=926289

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google