ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Secret to Hillary's success

Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:12 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** The secret to Hillary’s success: So how did Clinton win so decisively last night? The answer is women, specifically white women. They continue to be as important to her success in these primaries as new voters and African-Americans have been to Obama. Per the exit polls, 47% of the Pennsylvania Democratic electorate last night was made up of white women, higher than any other race/gender subgroup. Clinton ended up winning them by more than 30 points, 66%-34%; in Ohio, she won this group, 67%-31%. The question that everyone seems to be asking now is: Why can’t Obama put Clinton away? The AP’s Ron Fournier takes a stab at answering this, and he points to five reasons (race, working-class voters, friends in trouble, inexperience, and mettle). But to us, women seem to be the bigger reason. They continue to rally to her side; nothing has shaken their confidence in her. If Clinton continues to beat Obama by 30-plus points among white women, how can he knock her out?

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on the questions following the Clinton victory in the Pennsylvania primary.

*** Rocking the suburbs: What’s more, Clinton must have won white women decisively across the state's geographic landscape, because there's no other explanation for her pulling off the upset in the Philly suburbs. To most lay observers, Obama looked to be a lock to win the Philly ‘burbs; the only question was by how much. But he didn’t win them. Overall, Obama carried just seven of the state's 67 counties. In his successful gubernatorial primary win over Bob Casey in 2002, Ed Rendell carried 10 counties -- and the big difference between Rendell's path and Obama's was that Rendell carried Montgomery and Bucks counties, while Obama lost MontCo narrowly and got clobbered in Bucks. This success by Clinton in the suburbs, by the way, might be the best talking point the campaign has going forward because it's the first evidence in weeks that Clinton has finally cut into Obama's coalition. Of course, Pennsylvania could simply be her Wisconsin, where everything that happens in the state, well, stays in the state. Remember Wisconsin? That was Obama's supposed big break through in cutting into Clinton's coalition of white, working-class voters and even white women. Wisconsin didn't take for Obama. Will Pennsylvania take for Clinton?

*** The Tar Heel equalizer? Like it or not, the Obama folks are going to have to deal with the fact that popular vote is going to be a metric for SOME superdelegates. The good news for them is that not every superdelegate thinks this is a fair barometer, but enough do that the Clinton campaign is going to successfully tout this measurement. But this fight for the popular vote could be very short-lived. While the contest for pledged delegates is over, with Obama holding what now appears to be an insurmountable 150+ lead, the fight for the popular vote lives on for another two weeks. But it may be on for ONLY another two weeks. Why? North Carolina. A top-10 population state, Clinton can't afford to lose it at all -- let alone lose it by 10 points or more -- because if she loses the state by 10 points, she'll lose 150,000 of the 200,000 in popular vote she gained yesterday. And if she loses by 15 points, he can wipe out the 200,000-plus she netted completely. After May 6, there's just not enough vote for her to catch up. So while all eyes may be on Indiana as a "tie breaker" (the words of Obama, not us), North Carolina may be a bigger key in two weeks. Because of North Carolina’s size, the Clinton campaign is going to have a harder time dismissing the state's significance than they did Mississippi and some of the smaller states. The Clinton campaign has an effective talking point against Obama on this idea he can't win in certain big states, but the effective talking point Obama has is that he competes in every state. And this is why she can't avoid North Carolina because it's a big state, so it's not something she can avoid. She can keep going if she wins Indiana but she can't win the nomination; if she wins North Carolina, THAT would be a game changer, period.

*** Another Obama-is-Reagan analogy: Now what? The biggest shot in the arm for Clinton appears to be financial. The campaign took pains last night to make sure everyone was updated minute by minute about her online fundraising success last night (some $2.5 million in the three hours following the Pennsylvania election call). Financially, the Clinton camp is living dollar in, dollar out (while the debt piles up). This could mean the significance of Pennsylvania won't fully be known until after May 6. Why? Because if Obama sweeps Indiana and North Carolina, one of the reasons will be his financial advantage. In fact, there's a chance that what Obama did to Clinton in Pennsylvania is akin to what Reagan did to the Soviet Union in the 1980s -- He dragged her into a spending war she couldn't keep up with. Still, as of right now, Obama's looking like someone who is limping to the nomination battered and bruised rather than sailing through smoothly. Bottom line: this is a cold war and the candidate with the deeper pockets is likely to hang on.

*** It’s a bird, it's a plane, it’s another Obama superdelegate: Before the sun even rose, the Obama campaign rolled out the endorsement of Oklahoma Gov. Brad Henry, a superdelegate and someone from one of those uncontested red states. Interestingly, Oklahoma is a state Clinton carried on February 5 -- by A LOT. By the way, does Clinton have an interesting superdelegate endorsement or two in her back pocket right now? She just hasn't had a BIG endorsement in weeks. Of the remaining "gets" the one that seems most likely to come to her side (and would serve as a real boost) would be John Edwards, although he’s not a super. Newsweek's Howard Fineman said on MSNBC last night Elizabeth Edwards is likely to show up at a Clinton rally or two, but can she convince the ex-candidate to come over? It's a tough decision for John Edwards since Obama is such a heavy favorite in his home state.

*** Perception vs. reality: Perception always means more than reality. For instance, last night, just how important was it that Clinton's lead got to 10 points rather quickly and stayed there before settling down to 9 points? With 99% of precincts reporting, it was Clinton 54.69%, Obama 45.31%. What if her lead was 6-7 all night, and then ended overnight at 9 points? It's a little thing, but perception for her (and her donors) is everything right now. For those wondering, Clinton won Ohio by more than 10 points, 55.23% vs. 44.77%.

*** Where we stand: Obama leads in pledged delegates per the NBC hard count (1482 to 1326), overall delegates (1720 to 1588), the popular vote (14,447,568 to 13,964,439), and total number of contests won (29 to 15). Note: We’re not including Texas in this last total, given that Clinton won the primary but Obama won the caucus and netted the most delegates. That new popular vote total (not counting FL or MI) has Obama leading Clinton, 49%-47%. For those keeping score, that's a difference of 483,129. Projecting the rest out…

 

Total votes

Clinton

Obama

Projection

NC

1,500,000

675,000

825,000

45%-55%

IN

900,000

460,000

440,000

51%-49%

WV

400,000

240,000

160,000

60%-40%

KY

500,000

300,000

200,000

60%-40%

OR

600,000

270,000

330,000

45%-55%

SD

100,000

45,000

55,000 

45%-55%

MT

125,000

56,250

68,750

45%-55%

TOTAL

 

2,046,250

2,078,750

 

So those remaining contests, per this conservative projection, bring Obama’s popular vote lead to 515,629. If you add Florida, that gives Clinton almost another 300,000 more. So you if you include the Sunshine State, Obama will still lead her by about 215,000 popular votes. No wonder Clinton herself decided to start talking about Michigan again, because she can't "win" the popular vote without it. The problem: Even many Clinton supporters believe it’s not a valid measurement.

*** We can stop the delegate math: Turning to the delegate math, if Clinton nets approximately 16 delegates out of Pennsylvania, she'll trail in the pledged battle by 150 delegates. With just 408 pledged delegates remaining, that means she'd need 68% of all pledged delegates left to overtake Obama. Now, if Obama and Clinton simply split the 187 delegates up for grabs on May 6 basically down the middle (which would be a rosy projection in Clinton's favor) and Obama's pledged delegate lead simply stayed at 150 and didn’t grow to 160 (the most likely outcome in two weeks), Clinton would need to win 85% of the then 221 remaining delegates up for grabs. 85%! As we mentioned on air last night, the battle for pledged delegates is over, Obama will win that metric and win it by some 100+ delegates.

*** The GOP goes there…: This morning, NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann reports, the North Carolina GOP will unveil a 30-second ad that attacks Democratic gubernatorial candidates Beverly Perdue and Richard Moore for their endorsements of Obama. The ad, per the party, will reference "controversial figures from Barack Obama's past" and raise the question of the candidates' "judgment" in supporting him. The ad will be unveiled at an 11:00 am press conference. So far, the Democratic gubernatorial campaigns say that they have not yet seen it and declined to comment before knowing the content. But it's anticipated by Democratic bigs in the state that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright will play a starring role.

*** Back on The Hill: Per NBC’s Ken Strickland, both Clinton and Obama will return to the Senate today to vote on a bill challenging a Supreme Court ruling on equal pay. Last year, the Supreme Court ruled in Ledbetter vs. Goodyear that lawsuits claiming pay discrimination had to follow Equal Employment Opportunity Commission procedures and be filed within 180 days of when the employer first gave Ms. Ledbetter her check. The legislation would allow the 180-day-clock to run each time a paycheck is received. Today’s vote, Strickland adds, is only procedural, requiring 60 votes to advance the bill. It's unlikely supporters will muster that many votes, let alone the 67 needed to overcome the president's veto threat.
 
*** On the trail: Clinton holds a rally in Indianapolis before returning to DC; McCain -- on the third leg of his tour -- is in Kentucky; and Obama holds a town hall in New Albany, IN before heading to DC. Also, Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife in North Carolina, making five stops there.

Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 13 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 195 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 272 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Everyone is always saying - "just do the math"!  So why does the media fall (or allow itself to be shoved)right into Hillary's spin on the results of the Pennsylvania primary?  My math says that the only way you get to a "double digit" victory is if you round his numbers down and round her numbers up.  But in reality - it was short of double digit!!
Steve in San Diego.  Didn't California also vote for HRC?  Anyway, nice comment to welcome those voters into your camp for the GE.  This is why BO will not win in November, he and his supporters are nasty and mean spirited.  They claim a positive campaign and 90% of the comments on this board are either negative or immature insults.  I have posted what I feel are rational opinions as to why I do not support BO, but what I  see in response is just vitriol.  I can tell you now your candidate will have to run a 50 state campaign because McCain IS going to be competitive in CA, NY, NJ and MA.  Read some MA papers as how they are already fed up with BO 1.0 where the rookie Deval Patrick cannot govern even with a Democratic senate.  Current polls have BO tied with McCain in MA (even with Kennedy, Kerry and Patrick).  Oh and didn't he lose that primary too?
Obama can out spend Hillary by a large margin, but he can't seal the deal. I think it stinks to even talk about money deciding who gets to be president, but thats how it is. Just think what the results might be had Hillary spent more. No way Obama beats McBush!

To Steve in San Diego:  Why people vote for Obama I will never know.
Too little too late. Hillary has run a horrible campaign and some still vote for her? How can she help the economy if she can't keep from going into debt in her campaign? She couldn't outright fire Penn because she owes him too much money.

Experience? Show me. She didn't have a clearance when First Lady so she wasn't privvy to the details of crises during her husband's terms. She failed at health care once so her experience is one of failure. She failed the D.C. bar exam and decided to follow Bill to Arkansas.

A woman in the White House would be historic but why should it be Hillary? Neither Thatcher, Merkel, nor Bachelet rode to the leadership of their country on the coattails of their husbands. They did it on their own. If you want to see a female president, let's find one who can do it on their own and not because of whom they are married to.
This whole popular vote thing is absolutely ABSURD.  Many of the states Obama won (and he won BIG, no less) were caucuses which are not properly tallied into the popular vote.  Minnesota, for example, only counts for 1/4 of what Missouri counts for.  States like Iowa and Hawaii would have never held a caucus in the first place if they knew that Clinton was going to change the rules of the game when it's almost over, because they don't count, either.
Well done Hillary. Hillary has once again proven she can win big in the big, electoral rich, must win states for the Dems in November. Hillary has won ALL of these states, while Obama has won NONE. Obama's caucus wins are meaningless in a general election. Seriously friends, are you really delusional enough to believe that states like Utah are "in play" for the Dems in NOvember? LOL.

Hillary is the most qualified and most electable candidate in the race. If you cannot win in states like Ohio, Penn, New York, New Jersey, Mass. California, Florida and Michigan, you cannot win the Presidency. In polls today, Obama LOSES to McCain in these state matchups!!

Obama is unelectable. Outspending Hillary 4 to 1 has not changed that fact. Obama has failed to close the deal. Game over. Hillary MUST be the nominee of the Dem party for a victory in November.

Once again, the ONLY voting group that Obama won in Pennsylvania was the black vote. You can't be elected President if you can't carry any other voting group.

The Democratic party and the superdelegates would be wise to remember that for decades white women have been the majority voting block of the Dem party and WHITE WOMEN WANT HILLARY!  You see the numbers. When women vote, Democrats win.

*VOTE SMART!  VOTE PATRIOTIC!  VOTE HILLARY CLINTON!*
I think Chuck hit the nail on the head. This isnt about Barak Obama having a problem with blue collar or working class voters. Because Obama performs well among white men. People must understand that this is a trancending and historic election. The first african american and woman canidate for president. The reason why Hilary Clinton won in Pennsyvania is simple. WOMEN! Women are devoted to her almost as much as african americans are to Obama. Even if Obama was down to Clinton by 100+ plus delegates and popular vote and states won, african americans would still vote for him 80-20, 90-10. So even though Clinton is down in the math, women will still vote for her in mass numbers. Women make up over half of the voters! Im surprised Obama didnt lose by more than the Ohio number because Pennsylvania is actually older than Ohio and has double the amount of voters over 60 than Ohio does.

When the democratic party come together around Obama Im certain that women will too. Democrats are turning out record numbers. Obama will have the winning coalition in November to beat McCain, but if the superdelegates overrule the will of the people. That spells disaster.
The "upset" in the Philly suburbs is easily explained the so called rebublican converts are republicans answering the call of conservative talk radio hosts to vote for Hillary. Why?? Because they don't want to run against Barack. Why?? Because he'll win!!!
The GOP ads in North Carolina and other states reveal the shadowy work of Karl Rove. There is an obvious strategic similarity among GOP efforts in several states that can only be explained by national coordination. Not surprisingly, the ads are all anti-Obama, softening him up for the general election.

Brilliant...use the state-level races to affect the presidential contest, without the need for McCain or RNC money.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=935854

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google