ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: McCain's Bush problem

Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2008 9:19 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** McCain’s Bush problem: Yes, Jeremiah Wright could be a huge liability for Obama if he becomes the nominee. Sure, questions about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness could also hurt her in a general election, as well as Bill Clinton’s return to the White House. But according to the latest NBC/WSJ poll, the biggest political albatross heading into November is -- drum roll, please -- George Bush. In the poll, 43% say McCain being too closely aligned to Bush and his policies is a major concern. That’s compared with 36% who say that about Clinton’s apparent flip-flops; 34% who say that about Obama’s bitter-guns-religion remark; 32% who say that about Wright and Bill Ayers; 31% who say that about Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness; 27% who say that about Bill Clinton having too much influence on policy decisions; 17% who say that about Obama not being patriotic enough; and 16% who believe McCain might be too old. When you add that Bush problem to other macro-political trends -- just 27% approve of Bush’s job (his lowest mark ever in the survey), just 15% think the country is on the right track, 81% believe the country is in a recession -- that’s quite a head wind McCain and the Republicans are facing. So while the political world might beat the Wright issue to death or parse every little thing Bill says, let’s not forget overall dynamics of this presidential election.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd offers his first read on the turnaround in the latest NBC/WSJ poll.

*** Maverick or Bush ally? Of course, the above concern about Bush raises this question: Just how closely aligned is McCain to Bush? Well, the Arizona senator certainly has broken with Bush and the GOP on several issues: campaign finance reform (although Bush did sign that into law), judges (the Gang of 14), and torture. And those breaks certainly appear to help him among independents (see below). But some took place a while ago. What’s more, on the biggest issues out there -- Iraq, health care, economic policy (especially taxes) -- there is very little room between McCain and the president. McCain has spent the past several weeks since locking up the GOP nomination by solidifying his base, unveiling policy proposals, and raising money. But does he now begin breaking more with Bush? He started last week, when he disagreed with Bush’s handling of Katrina. What comes next? 

*** It’s the values, stupid…: While the overall political environment is tough for the GOP, McCain is running neck-and-neck with his Democratic rivals. In the NBC/WSJ survey, Obama leads the Arizona senator by three points (46%-43%) and Clinton is ahead of him by one (45%-44%). What’s going on here? Besides McCain’s appeal among independents, NBC/WSJ co-pollster Peter Hart (D) offers this explanation: values. “What is driving his image … is values,” he says. “It is faith, honor, country, and patriotism.” Indeed, 54% of respondents say that they identify with McCain’s background and set of values, compared with 46% of who say that of Clinton and 45% who say that of Obama, (which is a drop from the 50% who said this of the Illinois senator in late March). So ironically, if McCain ends up winning in November, it won’t be because of national security or Iraq; it will be because of values.

*** A house divided: Another thing that seems to be helping McCain is the ongoing contentious Democratic primary. In the poll, only 25% of Clinton voters say they would vote for Obama in the general with enthusiasm, with 30% saying they would NOT vote Obama. Similarly, just 26% of Obama voters say they would vote for Clinton enthusiastically in the general, with 22% saying they would NOT vote for Clinton. Moreover, nearly four in 10 Obama voters say they don’t identify with Clinton’s background and values, while almost five in 10 Clinton voters say the same about Obama. “The longer this contest is going on … the more they are beginning to dislike their opponent,” explains NBC/WSJ co-pollster Neil Newhouse (R). “It is extremely difficult for Republicans… But it’s being balanced by the fault lines [within] the Democratic Party.” The good news for the Democrats is that Obama’s or Clinton’s numbers will go up if they can bring their rival’s voters back in the fold. But is that an “if” or a “when”?

*** Has Obama become Clinton? What’s also interesting in the poll is that Obama’s support among independents isn’t too far off from Clinton’s. In an Obama-McCain match-up, McCain leads Obama among indies by 11 points (46%-35%), while his lead over Clinton is 14 points (46%-32%). Obama leads Clinton by three points (46%-43%) in the NBC/WSJ poll. But six to seven weeks of Wright and “bitter” have taken a toll on his standing with independents. The electability argument Obama used so well with superdelegates over the last few months is not backed up by facts anymore. The only thing Obama has going for him is his Dem opponent, who has similar image problems. The poll was conducted of 1,006 registered voters from April 25-28 -- as the Wright controversy resurfaced but BEFORE Obama’s speech denouncing his former pastor -- and it has an overall 3.1% margin of error.

*** Super switcheroo: A former Clinton-appointed DNC chairman, and early endorser of Hillary Clinton, has switched to Obama. Indianapolis native Joe Andrew told the AP, "I am convinced that the primary process has devolved to the point that it's now bad for the Democratic Party.” He said he is switching, then, because "a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote to continue this process, and a vote to continue this process is a vote that assists (Republican) John McCain." Andrew and the Obama camp will make it official at a 10:00 am Indianapolis news conference. This brings Obama the closest he’s ever been to Clinton in the superdelegate total. SUPERDELEGATES: Clinton 267-Obama 248 (280 undeclared). Obama has an 11-5 superdelegate advantage since the Pennsylvania primary. And since Clinton’s victories in Ohio and Texas, Obama has picked up 35 supers to Clinton’s 14; PLEDGED: Obama 1,490-1,334; OVERALL: 1,738-1,601.

*** Just asking: But when is Clinton going to talk an Obama superdelegate into switching? Do they have a few in their pocket for May 7 if they somehow sweep Tuesday’s contests? For now, it seems it's Obama who continues to have more lure to superdelegates and continues to find the occasional Clinton switcher. The addition of Andrew to Obama's fold is a big deal because of his title and because of the fact Bill Clinton appointed him to the job in the '90s. But it's what Andrew said that could have resonance: "I am convinced that the primary process has devolved to the point that it's now bad for the Democratic Party.” Does Andrew become a Clinton superdelegate whip at this point?

*** Expectations setting: A new Mason-Dixon poll in North Carolina shows that the constant barrage of bad news for Obama over this last week has taken a toll. The new poll has Obama's once insurmountable lead in the Tar Heel state looking, well, surmountable. He leads by just seven points, 49%-42%. Whispers out of Indiana indicate Clinton's on the move in some private polls and might even have the lead in the Hoosier State. So if Clinton takes this momentum and closes like she has in the last few primaries, the Democrats could have some mess on their hands on May 7. The New York Times has a piece today that claims she needs a big win in Indiana, not just a narrow one. We'll see if that's a fair expectations bar, but one thing's for sure: It does seem as if the expectations game is playing in Obama's favor despite the bad climate for him right now.

*** On the trail: Clinton campaigns in Indiana, making stops in Indianapolis, Jeffersonville, and Terre Haute; McCain already appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe from Cleveland, OH, where he holds a town hall, and then -- in a blast from the past -- heads to Des Moines, IA; and Obama, like Clinton, is in Indiana, stumping in Columbia City, Middlebury, and Lakeport. And in the spouse watch, Michelle Obama is in Indiana and Bill Clinton is in West Virginia and Indiana.

Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 5 days
Countdown to West Virginia: 12 days
Countdown to Kentucky and Oregon: 19 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 187 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 264 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Can someone is the media please cover the pending civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

I need to have some clarity on this issue as a voter.
Is this not an issue to consider?
America would be enjoying peace and prosperity if only recent presidents had possessed the qualities of Barack Obama:

SLOW to disown those he disagrees with.

SLOW to disown those who disagree with him.

SLOW to demonize.

SLOW to begin unnecessary wars.

The prosperity comes when our nation's resources are not funneled into the increasing spiral of war.
I must say that the sample sizes for these polls are not substantial enough.  Are any of these polls cumulative?  If so, what is the total population polled?  Tens of millions of voters with a sample size of 100K cumulative?  Please bring some real polls to the table.  Thanks.
Hillary went negative first.. nationally with her comment about "your slum lord support ...Rezko " connection..
Lesson learned...People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones...
Got it....your not running the Ind. Magnet story because it doesn't contain the word WRIGHT in it.  I think we all see what is going on at MSNBC.

Bob, Chicago
just a note Obama according to reports just out will pick up another three superdelegates .Msnbc needs to fix the count again
Dan, Madison, WI- MSNBC hasn't reported on the Magnequench story or the robocall story in North Carolina because they don't want to interupt the Rev. Wright coverage.  ABC also did a report on the robocall story, but at that time they did not know who was behind it.  We now know it is a group of Clinton supporters.  See story in Huffington Post.  Save your breath people, MSNBC is going to ride the Rev. Wright story all the way to the convention.
Rose,Omaha  
McCain winning on Values means 4 more years of Bush. This Country is so stupid. It's going to elect another Bush based on Values.  Values don't put food on the table; they don't reduce taxes; they don't save the environment.  What do values mean? If you aren't white anglo saxon evangelical bible beating christian, you have no place in this country.  If that's the case, then where can I get my emmigration papers for Canada or England?
Letter to MSNBC

Enough is Enough!

I'm now forced to watch CNN in the mornings and at night because they aren't driveling Wright's name every three seconds. We had the deadliest month in Iraq, over 80,000 jobs lost last month, inflation, etc., not counting Hillary's pastor molests a seven year old girl and you would rather waist our time with race baiting rather then worried about our kids? Get over yourselves.

Being I work for a media based company with over five thousand domain names, I understand ratings, I have to do reports on them... I will be forwarding this email to every friend and Obama group I can find. So, pay attention to your ratings as my intent is now a kitchen sink strategy.

Enough is Enough, I'm done with MSNBC
Obama-Rama-Ding-Dongs want to "quick-foot" the nominating process before their boy is fully vetted.
NOT SO FAST PEOPLE! There's no hurry here, the general election isn't until November.
We don't need to make a quick decision, we need to make the RIGHT decision.
It's clear that Obama will get beaten badly if we run him in the fall. The Wright controversy, 'Tony Rezko,' and his association with domestic terrorist William Ayers will do him, and our party in. If his campaign is falling apart NOW, imagine what will happen in September when the Republicans ratchet up the rhetoric against him.
Hillary may have her own baggage.
But, we know what to expect from her, and we know what they're going to attack her with.
They've been doing it for 16 years, and she's still standing.
I was undecided until two days ago. Now I'm absolutely convinced that Hillary is the right candidate.
Mission accomplished....America the mediocre.  The marble mouthed low IQ'd Bush has certainly been the worst president in memory.  McCain would only further America's progression to 3rd rate.  
Why isn't your front page telling the public more about Iran's complaint to the United Nations about Hillary's comment that she would obliterate Iran? This is real news are you reporter's or part of Hillary's campaign. I am disgusted with MSN.
What happen to Hillary having to win every state by 58% to even have a chance at becoming the president beginning with OH and TX....It didn't happen....What's going with the media???? Something is stinking in this room and they're the only ones left?
Like the first writer. its over.  Obama and hope Biden is with him  57%.  McCain 43%.  
Give it up Hillary
"Clinton closes, like in the last few primaries.."?
What are you talking about?
It would have been decent of you (something I don't think MSNBC is capable of anymore) to report the true story about PA. The story is how Obama closed the once 27% lead that she had and narrowed it to 9.  That is the true story.  It is funny how when Clinton is closing in on a lead you are screaming it from the roof tops.  Your constant barage of coverage about "Obama's bad news" was unprofessional and contrived.  You helped to create a mountain where their was none.  
I have not turned my television to your channel since the PA primary.  Your reporting is unprofessional in that you do not report the facts.  Why are you so scared of the Clintons?  I just don't get it.  We have such an opportunity to move in a new direction and something holds you back.  Again, why are you so afraid of the Clintons that you cannot and do not report all the news?
Here’s a story that if it is picked up by the mainstream media – as was the Reverend Wright story – could turn the momentum in Indiana.

Last night ABC reported about the closing of a defense industry plant in Valparaiso, IN and its move to China. This event was important not only because of the lost jobs, but also because it appears that some important, proprietary defense-related technology also may have been compromised.

Hillary Clinton has mentioned this event several times over the past couple weeks and attempts to put the blame at the feet of the Bush administration. The only problem with her storyline is that the selling of this company to the Chinese, which led to its eventual move to China, initially okayed by President Clinton. The Clinton administration gave their approval despite protestation from several defense experts concerned about the loss of a key defense technology. Even Senator Bayh has put the blame on the Clinton administration.

Of course, Hillary conveniently forgets to mention this part of the story. I understand that she is not Bill Clinton. But why not be truthful with the American people? Why the deception? Does she just think we are dumb or what? She cannot be trusted.

This story is so much more important than the Reverend Wright story. Hopefully, the media will take notice.
MSNBC and the other corporate media outfits won't report on this, but it is a MAJOR story:
John McCain has gotten away with the bald-faced lies that he has always been critical of the Bush administration's conduct of the Iraq war and that he always said it would be "tough."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-bergmann/five-years-since-mission_b_99398.html

This article shows McCain_repeatedly_ parroting the White House line that the war would be short and easy and could be won with a number of troops that was small relative to the 1991 Gulf War.

McCain never criticized the conduct of the war or Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld until it became apparent to the most clueless idiot that it was a complete disaster around 2006.


Sorry to interrupt your wall-to-wall coverage of the Rev. Wright, but it might be of concern to some folks that the man the corporate media wants to see installed in the White House is a clueless idiot, a warmonger with atrocious judgment, and a liar to top it all off. If this guy gets elected, people might get nostalgic about the good old days when Bush was president.
CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE.  We do not need the Clintons again, Hillary & Bill are a twofer.  Bill does not exhibit self control, he still gets red faced and wags his finger at us.  Remember Monica.  McSame has a short fuse and possibly some senior moments. Obama is thoughtful, has intellect, discipline and a sense of curiosity that would serve him well as a leader.
So now the polls are measureing the 'enthusiasm' of the voters when they vote for one Democratic candidate versus the other.  

I reminded of Richard Nixon's response to the statement that the voters would not 'pull the voting lever very hard.'   "It doesn't matter how hard they pull the lever, all that matters is that pull the lever for you.?
I encourage anyone that has submitted comments to MSNBC.com’s First Read and has seen very few of their comments posted, if at all, unlike the names listed above, to write an actual letter, not email, but a traditional letter that you mail through the United States Post Office to Phil Griffin the Executive in Charge of MSNBC and voice your outrage at not only the way that the editors of First Read deliberately post 98% of only Pro-Obama comments, but the way people like Mika Brzezinski can’t conduct herself in a professional and objective manner.

Phil Griffin’s address is

Phil Griffin
Senior Vice President, NBC News
Executive in Charge, MSNBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
27% approve of Bush’s job

This really scares me. Just knowing those people are out there and that I might be near one of them.  They are either seriously delusional or else they are sociopaths. Whenever I see a vehicle with a Bush/Cheney bumper sticker I give it a wide berth. These are people who hate America and what it stands for. They don't believe in: the constitution, the bill of rights, the separation of powers, an independent and fair justice department, and non-partisan courts. They do believe torture, lifetime imprisonment without trial, wars of agression, killing thousands of innocents, and a secret police state.
Please report on this Robocall story here in NC. It has been reported by our local Raleigh NBC affiliate that a group with strong ties to the Clintons has been caught making Robocalls to NC African-American voters giving them BOGUS voting info. The NC Attorney General is looking into it. What happened was that blacks were receiving calls from a man calling himself "Lamont" telling them to WAIT to vote until they received a voting packet in the mail. The problem is that these packets were for absentee voting which expired almost a month ago. We DO have a short period with same day registration/voting which started about a week ago and goes until this Saturday - but these calls did not mention that. Instead they were telling people to WAIT to vote until they received this packet!! These calls have been traced to a group called "Women's Voices, Women's Votes" whose president just sent a large contribution to Hillary's campaign and whose Executive Director worked for Bill Clinton in his 1992 campaign and whose Attorney helped in Bill's Impeachment defense. I hope the MSM will check into this.
Chuck, what am I missing? "...if Clinton closes as she has in the last few primaries..."  Wasn't it Obama who "closed" in Pennsylvania -- from a 20 point to a 9.4 point gap? Did she "close" in SC? Virginia? Maryland? Where?
McCain has a John Sidney McCain problem, and the only thing that Dems have working against them is that they (both) actually said he was going to be a formidable candidate.  Wow.  And I can’t believe HRC tried to come after Barack for saying he thought he would be better than Bush 43.  Now the American people think higher of JSM that JSM probably thinks of himself. I bet 3 months ago McCain was thinking to himself, "How can I win this election??? I am a Republican who supports many of Bush's policies, I said we may be in Iraq for 100 years (which I believe was taken out of context), I'm a maverick, and no I don't play along side Dirk Nowitzki, I'm old and I have admitted I don't know much about the economy.  I don’t believe we are in a recession although credible sources have stated we are.  I'm not sure if I said this earlier but I'm OLD. I made a speech about the economy which proved in its entirety how I do not know much about the economy.  I’m had a senior movement which I forgot about that speech and hopefully the American people have as well.  I’m on the campaign trail and no one really knows about me.  Mitt Romney made me look worse than Barack did on ABC at a debate in earlier this year in FLA.  I secretly wish I had the mind of Ron Paul.  Mitt Romney would have better electability than me even after what happen in Texas.  I can’t choose my running mate because I forgot who’s in congress. I say “my friends” in most of my speeches because that’s my slang for “whats up dawg”----I’m hoping it’ll help me bite into a little of Barack’s youth vote. I’ve admitted that HRC and I are very good friends.  (Me speaking-If I were VP I don’t think I could say the same) AND, not only can I not get any of my rehearsed words on al qaeda in Iraq right, but I think I’ll forget that the US is in a war in Iraq.  
Lie down with dogs; get up with fleas.
"This brings Obama the closest he’s ever been to Clinton in the superdelegate total."
--Seriously FR, every day brings Obama the closest he's ever been to Clinton's superdelegate total.  (Maybe with the exception of the first days of this rat race).

I opt to defend Clinton on her choreographed carpool and coffee experience.  Because I give her points for doing it.

I shun Clinton on her gas tax position.  Once the candidate of the economy, she is proving to be more the candidate of pander.  AND also proving to be about as in tune with the economy as 'I don't know nuttin' McCain'.  AND her position is not very green, I guess her environmental speak is merely pander as well--economically, I understand, that it would be smart to maintain the gas tax and refund $25 some other way if that is what she wants to do.  Pander and dishonesty will get her nowhere.
Laura, VA...please get real, I beg you!
Obama has gotten nothing but puff-ball treatment by the media up until now.
Fidelity to one's country, and respect for its' customs and courtesies ARE issues; as is the associations that one makes while rising to any position of power in the government.
It's clear that Obama was not fully vetted, and that he cannot handle the pressure. He has flip flopped on the subject of his pastor. First he said he could no more disassociate with him than he could someone in his own family.
Two days ago he threw him under the bus.
We could have accepted that a month ago.
But instead he gave a disenguous lecture on race in America, and told us we all have to be more tolerant.
It's one thing to say, "okay this is enough, I'm getting off at the next stop."
It's all entirely different to continue riding the train when you know full well it's heading in the wrong direction,....THEN blame the engineer or the conductor because you ended up far away from where you wanted to go.
Obama knew that guy for 20 years. Went to his services every Sunday, and listened to everything he had to say.
He knew full well what he was all about and he wasn't going to dismiss any of it unless/until it started to hurt him in the polls.
When it did he cut Wright loose.
I'm sorry, but that isn't leadership, and we certainly don't need someone with that kind of "character" in the White House.
I'll be supporting Hillary for the nomination, thank you....you should be too!
Valid question! Why aren't you reporting this?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4757257&page=1
"Bush has done a terrific job in hos eight years. He had a lot of cleaning up to do after the Clinton administration. Lowering taxes is always a good idea, and he brought back status and dignity to the office. A great man."

--------

Okay. This totally made me giggle. This HAS to be irony and satire.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=966433

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google