ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Michelle defends, re-introduces husband

Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2008 6:22 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Aswini Anburajan
JEFFERSONVILLE, Ind. -- Michelle Obama spoke to the heart of the conservative attack against her husband Wednesday morning, telling a room full of Obama supporters that it was incumbent on them to get the true picture of who her husband was out to undecided voters before Tuesday's primary.

"There are a lot of people who don't know anything about us,” she said. “Anything other than the caricatures that have been painted of us in the media. And that is the nature of the process.”

She claimed that if she or her husband had just had 15 or 30 minutes to individually meet with each voter, the nominating process would have ended long ago but building that degree of familiarity with the electorate was impossible.

"And the game counts on that," she said. "It counts on the fact that there's no way that all these people are really going to know who Barack Obama is, so let me paint a different picture really quickly, which hopefully will stick and will distract people from what they're really asking for anyway."

Her comments reflected on the controversies that have embroiled her husband both recently -- Rev. Wright and William Ayres -- but also to false rumors circulating about him, including photos that try to prove he doesn't put his hand over his heart during the pledge of allegiance and e-mails claiming he's a Muslim. 

Conservatives have latched onto these false rumors as well as the Wright controversy to argue that Obama is not patriotic, tarnishing his image as a post-partisan figure untainted by the ideological struggles between liberals and conservatives in the baby boom generation.

Or, as Sen. John McCain had said in an interview with Chris Matthews on Hardball, he couldn't comment on whether Obama was an elitist or not, because he just didn't know Obama that well.

Mrs. Obama embraced the argument that her husband was unknown, arguing that it established him as an "underdog."

"But anybody who's talking about change is an underdog because there's a whole system and a history that says, 'Uh-uh, we're not ready for that; We don't need that, that change is scary; you should wonder who his pastor is,'" she joked. "You know there's always something."

Using the recent attacks on Obama as an x-factor in American politics as a rallying cry for the campaign's supporters, she called the supporters in attendance the campaign's "validators." She urged them to "get on the phone," "have some arguments," heart to hearts," in order to allay the doubts voters may have about Obama.

"You know 20 other people in your lives who are afraid, who don't really understand Barack," Mrs. Obama said. "They are confused on an issue; they believe something that's not true. They think he's a Muslim; they think he's a 'this'; they think he's all the names that have come up and have stuck or not stuck. You know you've talked to these people. I would love to talk to them, but I can't.”

"So this is the difficult thing. This is why it's always an uphill battle," she continued. "Folks in this country believe that, who they think they know, is safer than who they're not quite sure that they know."

She also joked about how she and her husband were labeled as elitist, while she worried about spending too much at Target, and after they had just paid off their student loans only a few years ago. She claimed that because they were so recently in debt, they were closer to the lives of the Americans they wished to represent and had a set of values that they use to practice in their politics -- unlike their political opponents. 

"Our values transcend it all,” she said. “And its not that other candidates have values; it’s just how they are translated in their politics. Sometimes folks who have been in this for a while, they just don't know how to be anything than what the process has been. That's why sometimes you need new blood just to shake it up a bit."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Getting to know you and your values....

NBC Family Ties/ Brian Williams' focus on Who is Obama  http://youtube.com/watch?v=7An5LPXjOa4&feature=related

Obama tribute to his Mother       http://youtube.com/watch?v=eRYh3Ae-DoQ&feature=related

Pass it on.


It seems that the Reverend Wright issue is not a controversy - we all seem to agree.  Why do you use the word "controversy"?
Excerpt from an AP article (dated May 1, 2008 ("Defection of Longtime Superdelgate Jolts Clinton," by David Espo)) about the Democratic Primary:

"Former President Bill Clinton was in West Virginia on his wife's behalf. In Clarksburg, he called her a scrapper and contrasted her appeal among working-class voters with the elitists he said support Obama.

'The great divide in this country is not by race or even income, it's by those who think they are better than everyone else and think they should play by a different set of rules,' he said. 'In West Virginia and Arkansas, we know that when we see it.'"

Comment:  Isn't this a peculiar quote that deserves some attention from the blogosphere and the MSM?  Curious how President Clinton should use this phrasing when Senator Clinton's campaign can arguably be tied to the same "rule-changing" (e.g., the Florida/Michigan pact, the "it's the delegates, stupid" comments, etc.) that appears to be a key (and some might say, indispensable) part of the Clinton campaign strategy.  This is apart from the fact that Senator Clinton's policy prescriptions are presented in the same "I-know-what-is-best-for-America" tone that was evident at times during President Clinton's Administration.

I guess you could just sum this up by saying, "Pot . . . meet kettle."  (Isn't this deja vu . . . I mean, hasn't this been said with respect other comments made by the Clinton campaign before?)
I bet both Barrack and Michelle know how to pump gas!

Go Obama!
Being a Muslim would be a step up for what ever Obama is now, especially if Wright is any indication of Obama's background.
Michelle is an angry woman that occasionally blurts out extremist remarks. Barack should disown her.
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS ALL.
ABOUT HILLARY STAFFER.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-MzByUHIzw&feature=ema
Good for Michelle, but she has to realize the same way I did a while back, that a lot of these voters are not going to vote for an AA man with integrity regardless of how honest, and regardless of the great ideas and policies that he can bring to the table. They would rather see our country flushed down the toilet.  But, I do commend her for trying.

OBAMA, 2008!
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS ALL.
ABOUT HILLARY STAFFER.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-MzByUHIzw&feature=ema
Michelle is terrific and such a "rock" to Barack.  I admire both of them andI'll continue to suppoet them to the White House. I know he'll be a terrific President and she'll make a wonderful First Lady.
What a brillant and yet, down to earth team.  
"Yes we can!"
Sen. Clinton's judgement cannot be compared to Sen. Obama's and neither  can their sincerity to run for a public service.  The voters in the remaining nine primaries should reconsider their support for the Clintons.  This is why Sen. Clinton is not electable.

http://www.sftt.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=10&p=205231
I don't understand what the Obama campaign is thinking. Yesterday or certainly today was the day to change the subject from the running-on-fumes Pastor controversy. I would have suggested a comprehensive fuel conservation speech (carpooling ideas, flannel pajamas and sleep with socks in the winter, subsidies to reduce public transportation costs, etc. etc. etc). This would not only change the subject but offer a more credible solution to the energy problem than the ridiculous tax holiday. All the campaign rhetoric is about alternative energy sources and nothing about reducing consumption.

CMON BARACK-----CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!
WE are behind you and Barrack 100%.   I am from Ohio and have driven over to IN to canvass today and will do the same every day until May 6.  Keep the faith, what the devil meant for evil, God means for Good.
I'd look closer to home and not just to "conservative attacks".

If Barack Obama is sincere about changing the approach to politics and moving beyond politics of old, and let's assume he is, his biggest obstacle is represented by Jeremiah Wright and the rest of the entrenched black power structure, also represented by Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan.

These power mongers rely on victim status in order to perpetuate their control of their constituency.  Obama, with the message of looking beyond race, is a threat to that.

And look at who the entrenched black power structure has been aligned with in the past.  It is with the Clinton wing of the Democrat party, the "first black president" and his wife.

Perhaps conservatives have reacted predictably to the Wright rantings, but the origins of the current controversy might be traced to a different source.

Republicans really have no horse in this primary race that goes on and on.  They will work at weakening both potential candidates.  That's just the way it is for both parties.

But who has the most interest, especially currently, in making things hard on Barack Obama?

Any time Bill Clinton moans about having the race card played against him is probably an indicator he/they are playing it themselves.
Wow, a genuine people.

If the Democratic Party caters to the Clintons and allow her to destroy Obama for her own personal gain.....then I will sing around the rubble after it collapses and falls.  

Who's going to lead the new Progressive Party?  Russ Feingold?
The problem is not that we do not know O but that we are beginning to...
Months ago there were rumors that his church was "Afro-Centric" and I remember reading on MSNBC that it was untrue. Then we heard the church's pastor speaking...
The American people are not afraid of change, just weary of what exactly an O president would be...
M, how about explaining your own admission that you have never been proud of our country until now...I know a lot of people in Miami who are liberal and we still do not know exactly what you meant; please call me and explain?!?!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=969784

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google