ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First Thoughts: Obama's back to the wall

Posted: Friday, May 02, 2008 9:31 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Obama’s back against the wall: After Pennsylvania, a lot of folks -- including us -- figured that Obama would win North Carolina by as much, or even more, than Clinton won the Keystone State, thus erasing the gains she made there in delegates and the popular vote. But the race in Carolina is tightening from the double-digit lead he once held; a new Research 2000 poll has him up by seven points, 51%-44%. After several days of Jeremiah Wright dominating the news -- plus some new polls showing an erosion of support -- Obama's back is against the wall, at least in terms of perception and momentum. Of course, almost every time a candidate's back has been against the wall this campaign (think Clinton and McCain in NH, Obama and McCain in SC, and Clinton in OH and PA), that candidate has flourished. Will Obama continue the trend? His appearance on Meet the Press this Sunday might offer some clues.

VIDEO: NBC Deputy Political Director Mark Murray gives his first read on the tightening North Carolina race and previews Tuesday's primary there and in Indiana.

*** The front-runner spotlight: Should Tuesday’s results end up giving Clinton more momentum and extend this race even longer, it could be the worse thing to happen to Clinton. Why? It could invite the dreaded front-runner spotlight. Think about it: None of the remaining candidates has done well when the media spotlight was on them the brightest. The most intense coverage McCain received was in the first six months of 2007, the worst six months of his campaign and the period of time he was the closest thing the GOP had to an inevitable nominee. Clinton's toughest coverage came from about October 2007 to March 1, 2008, the worst six months of her campaign and the time she was considered the inevitable nominee. Now, it's Obama's turn in this version of "kill the man." Remember that game? Where the goal was for everyone to tackle the person with the football? Welcome to political kill the man, in which the media and opponents have successfully tackled McCain last year, Clinton earlier this year, and Obama now. Of course, someone has to survive this war of attrition. We're not going to find new candidates to tackle, are we?

*** 96 hours to go: Indiana and North Carolina are the two biggest states left on the calendar (sorry Puerto Rico, we know you may have a higher turnout than Indiana and more voters, you won't have more delegates). And because of the fairly large and swing nature of Indiana and North Carolina, it's fair to say that if either candidate sweeps the contests, it's going to be a major turning point in the campaign. An Obama sweep, and Clinton might not last the week. A Clinton sweep, meanwhile, and a contested convention is guaranteed.  A split decision, and the trickle to Obama by uncommitted superdelegates probably continues and Obama keeps up his successful limp toward the finish line.

*** The over and under: So with this in mind, let's have some Vegas-like fun. If Vegas were charged with setting the line, our best guess is that Clinton would be giving three points in Indiana, while Obama would giving five points in North Carolina. This doesn't mean this is the prediction for either state we're making, this is simply the margin of victory projection that we think would invite an even amount of money being bet on each candidate. If you actually could find someone to take a bet on the margin of victory for both candidates, you'd need to ask yourself this question when looking at the polling: Where will undecideds go? Does Obama nab any of these undecideds? There are some analysts who believe Obama won't win many of them in either North Carolina or Indiana. And if that's the case, watch out -- both states could be VERY surprising. Undecideds haven't broken for Obama since February. Is this a race deal? So while folks aren't lying to pollsters about support for Obama, those who want to vote against Obama on race are saying they are undecided.

*** Bill works it hard in Carolina: The Clinton campaign clearly seems to smell something in North Carolina. Bill Clinton is barnstorming the state like nobody's business on Monday. He's got nine -- count 'em NINE -- stops on Monday.  Phew. One of us has argued that Hillary wouldn't have gotten this far without Bill, and can't get across the finish line because of him. BUT, if she pulls the upset in North Carolina, it will be Bill's victory. It's just stunning how well he's working these small southern towns. In fact, whoever the nominee is, Bill may be showing the playbook for how to use the former president: send him to these Ruby Red Southern states and let him do his thing. He may be gaffe-a-week prone on the national stage, but sending him to the rural white parts of the South might be a smart move if he'll agree to do it -- if Obama's the nominee. Perhaps the only way he'll agree to campaign this hard in the fall in these areas is if his wife's on the ticket. And it's this last point that we think many of us have overlooked: Has Clinton stayed in this race for so long against all delegate math odds because she wants to force Obama's hand on the No. 2 slot?

*** The day in delegates: Today, Obama camp unveiled another former DNC Chair, Paul G. Kirk. Yesterday, Clinton added four superdelegates to her total; Obama added two, including a switch from Clinton. Clinton got four New York add-ons (Obama will get three after the Illinois convention this weekend) and CT DNC member John Olsen (president of the state AFL-CIO). But Clinton lost a key IN supporter Joe Andrew, a former DNC chair appointed by Bill Clinton. Obama also got TX DNC member John Patrick, the state AFL-CIO vice president. The count: SUPERDELEGATES: Clinton 272-250; PLEDGED: Obama 1,490-1,334; OVERALL: 1,740-1,606.

*** Louisiana special watch: In Louisiana tomorrow, there’s a special election between Don Cazayoux (D) and Woody Jenkins (R) to replace Rep. Richard Baker (R), who resigned his seat to take a lobbying job. And as it stands right now, after the Democrats captured Denny Hastert’s seat earlier in the year, Democrats are well positioned to win a second GOP-held district. The reason, says David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report, is that Cazayoux appears to be the better candidate. “Democrats have a better candidate… I think the candidate is important in a special election,” in which turnout is usually low. The Republican groups -- the NRCC and Freedom’s Watch -- have tried to nationalize this race by linking the conservative Cazayoux to Obama and Pelosi on taxes and health care. But Democrats believe that by nationalizing the race, especially bringing Obama’s name into the mix, will help boost the turnout of African Americans, who make up about 35% of the district.

*** Don’t you forget about me: By the way, Guam votes tomorrow (or is Sunday or did it take place yesterday; that whole International Dateline confuses us). Four pledged delegates at stake.

*** On the trail: Clinton campaigns in North Carolina, stumping in Hendersonville and Greensboro and speaking at the North Carolina Democratic Party Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in Raleigh; McCain campaigns in Colorado, where he holds a health care town hall and speaks to reporters before heading to Arizona; and Obama has a morning event in Hammond, IN, then goes to the Tar Heel State, holding a rally in Charlotte and also speaking at the J-J Dinner in Raleigh. Also, Bill Clinton campaigns in Indiana and Michelle Obama is in North Carolina.
 
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 4 days
Countdown to West Virginia: 11 days
Countdown to Kentucky and Oregon: 18 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 186 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 263 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I’m not trying to be all syrupy, but don’t you think Barack & Michelle Obama make a nice couple?  Not like Bill & Hill, or John & Cindy, or W & Laura.

The reason I mention this is because the two of them have done a nice job these past few days trying to dispel the notion that they are elitists and not in touch with everyday Americans.  If people would wake up and get smart, they would see that the Clinton’s could not be more unlike everyday Americans, and the McCain’s at best represent only about 21% (the crowd that still thinks W is doing a good job).  I hope this latest effort by Senator Obama is resonating with folks, and that we can finally put this nomination process to bed next week in Indiana & North Carolina.
Do you all have any polling data for Guam, or any information as to how it's electorate is leaning?
And why is his back against the wall...... Because people like YOU in the media, have ON PURPOSE ignored important stories like Magnaquench, Sid Bluementhal, Mickey Kantor!!!!!!

No let's put Rev. Wright's picture on the political page ON MORE FREAKIN' TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  
why are you playing down yet another super-super delegate for obama and saying is back is against the wall? even if he takes both states she is far from even pulling even...
MSNBC, report what the others are reporting.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/01/clinton.iran/index.html

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/30/iran-condemns-clinton-for-threatening-to-attack/

Paul v. Clinton, MSNBC where is it?

HRC’s ties to black revolutionaries while at Yale, MSNBC where is it?

HCR criticizes Indiana plant closings which Bill approved while in office, MSNBC where is it?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4757257&page=1
"Now, it's Obama's turn in this version of "kill the man." Remember that game? Where the goal was for everyone to tackle the person with the football? Welcome to political kill the man, in which the media and opponents have successfully tackled McCain last year, Clinton earlier this year, and Obama now. Of course, someone has to survive this war of attrition. We're not going to find new candidates to tackle, are we?"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Wow! Did you just admit that the media selects a candidate to pile on in attempt to politcally "kill him"? It's a fun game, but sadly the outcome is predictable - a whole lot of talking and no solutions. Again. But hey, at least no one is bitter about it, right?

I like how NBC used a NY Times article about Reverend Wright to make it this morning's headlines on its site.  Even CNN has moved on past the story so I'm surprised your guys are trying to juice it for a third straight day by writing stories about the story.

All of a sudden, NBC has figured out that the American public is craving to know what's going on in the Black church?

If you guys want to juice it for ratings, go ahead, but please don't get conservative when ever you get around to do multiple stories about McCain and Hagee and McCain and Falwell and how those preachers believed that 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina were deserved by America.    

LOL, gimme a break....
Indiana and North Carolina --
There's the pitch
It's a sinker thrown by Hillary...Obama swings the bat with a mighty thunder...
Some where birds are singing and some where children are laughing but there's no joy in Billary ...The
Mighty Barack has crushed her "testicular fortitude" out of the park!!!!

(catcher of the hanglia said,
" I'll be selling it on Ebay, stay tuned ">)
Obama should win North Carolina by 15 points or more, and if he doesn't it will be a failure.
He's got more money, more resources, and more support among black voters (NC has a very large black population) than Hillary.
If he wins by single digits something is definitely wrong.
He should also sweep both Indiana and NC. Again, if he doesn't there's something seriously wrong. The once mighty Obama machine is sputtering and studdering.....no way to start a general election campaign
Chuck, I'm disappointed!  You usually bring reason to this.

Hillary's back was against the wall in Ohio and Pennsylvania?  She was the vastly overwhelming favorite going into each of those states, as you reported at the time.

I hope you're not letting your judgment be hijacked.
Hey Indiana!

"Those people are sh!t" according to Clinton campaign staffer, regarding Indiana: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-MzByUHIzw&feature=email

I think Hillary should reject, renounce, repudiate, tar and feather her staffer immediately.
Unless a candidate decides issues based on merit and principle, that candidate is not worthy of being considered for president. The issues in this election are too important for anything less than a principled stand on issues.

Could this be the year that the high road becomes the choice of preference in American politics? The magnitude of the issues demands no less.
Interesting how "first read" is quickly becoming a rather Anti-Obama thing.  
Go Obama!

If the Clintons smell something in North Carolina, maybe they should check their campaign.  Lots of things smell there.
Please Chuck or anyone on your staff, report the following.

I have been reading most of the comments on your post Chuck Todd and it seems that many are asking why MSNBC, NBC and the rest of MSM isn't reporting about Peter Paul's lawsuit against the Clintons filed in California. Why is the networks so afraid to talk about this?
Wow! It must be so nice to have a former President to campaign for you, knee cap your opponents for you, and lend you his record so you can run on it! Then you get to sit back and be a "fighter" while cherry picking which states are "important" and feeding the media "popular vote" analysis that completely ignores the caucus states!

Strength and experience indeed - we should all be so lucky!
Chuck, How come you didn't mention the Zogby poll today which has Obama up by 15 points in NC?
Please remember that the polls in NC that were shown in previous weeks had a LARGE % of UNDECIDED voters. Obama has not slipped - he has actually gone up a few points. But Hillary has gained more. That is why the race is tightening. Go back to last week and you'll see that there was a 15 to 20 % of undecided voters. Now more people are making up their minds. I still think Obama will win. But NC is demographiclly more like TN than SC. We have just 21% African-American - SC has 37%. Much of the state is rural. Our governor appeals to the blue collar voters who Hillary attracts. We have a huge number of recent retirees from NY and New England. Yes we have many colleges but many of these kids are registered in their home states. We have only one large city - Charlotte. Greensboro, Asheville, and Raleigh are not huge. So Obama should win - but probably neither he nor Hillary would carry NC in November. Remember Kerry lost here in 2004 even with Edwards on the ticket. It is a very conservative state.
True that the polls M-Th look really good for Clitnon, but today's polls seem much better for Obama.. Did he get back some momentum with his heartfelt reject of Wright?

Race Poll Results Spread
North Carolina Democratic Primary Zogby Obama 50, Clinton 34 Obama +16.0
Indiana Democratic Primary Zogby Clinton 42, Obama 42 Tie
North Carolina Democratic Primary Research 2000 Obama 51, Clinton 44 Obama +7.0
Democratic Presidential Nomination CNN Obama 46, Clinton 45 Obama +1.0
General Election: McCain vs. Clinton CNN McCain 44, Clinton 49 Clinton +5.0
General Election: McCain vs. Obama CNN McCain 45, Obama 49 Obama +4.0
Indiana Democratic Primary Downs Center Clinton 52, Obama 45 Clinton +7.0
Democratic Presidential Nomination Pew Research Obama 47, Clinton 45 Obama +2.0
General Election: McCain vs. Clinton Pew Research McCain 45, Clinton 49 Clinton +4.0
General Election: McCain vs. Obama Pew Research McCain 44, Obama 50 Obama +6.0

You are more than welcome to continue lower Obama's expectations though..
I wonder if the media will discuss the video that is breaking from youtube in which a Clinton advisor calls folks from Indiana a truly reprehensible term. Since apparently the candidates are all subject to being judged by the brazen and bizarre behavior of their acquaintances, I do think team Clinton should have to answer for denigrating an entire state's populace and using racial epithets. It'll be interesting if this actually happens or if the media finds itself unable to blink from the "crazy black man" spectacle it has unceasingly promoted.
Chuck, new Zogby poll in NC has Obama up 16 points. Also, it would be interesting if a comparison of all the polling organizations was done showing the accuracy of their predictions in various contests, say within one week of an election.
Obama will be the one on top
Ole'
Want change from someone you can trust to follow through? OBAMA 08'
Looks like the NC race just got untightened.

Fresh Zogby poll out today shows Obama with 16 point lead in NC and all tied up in Indiana.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1495

SurveyUSA Oregon: Obama, +6
You have just proved my point.  In Penn HRC was up 15 to 20 points and won by 9-10 points, MSNBC (especially Chris Matthews) reported she killed Obama. OMG will he ever get up again? Now the reverse may happen in NC and MSNBC reports his back is against the wall.  OMG you guys are full of yourself.  

To continue facts: The last 2 nites David Gregory's show was almost TOTALLY about Wright.  The panel said they had caller phoning them saying enough about Wright.  Hasn't MSNBC had enough.  MSNBC can't figure out why this issue is still alive well ITS BECAUSE OF YOUR WILLINGNESS TO CONTINUE REPORT ON IT!!!!  

Bob, Chicago

"Should Tuesday’s results end up giving Clinton more momentum and extend this race even longer, it could be the worse thing to happen to Clinton. Why? It could invite the dreaded front-runner spotlight. Think about it:"
***************************

Only in the MSM's demented controversy feeding mind could someone who is behind by every democratic measure be considered a front runner.

Here is what the media wants: They want Clinton to win BOTH, so that for the next several weeks they can indulge themselves in "ooooh ahhhh, OMG so much drama, looks like Clinton will win it! wow!!!" Then they want Obama to make a comeback - something happens to Clinton like, oh, say PETER PAUL. Then they can go on for another few weeks with "ooooh ahhhh OMG it's gonna be close!!!" Then, ultimately, they want this to go to the Democratic National Convention with each candidate having an advantage in one metric, with delegates split. They want riots to ensue, and they will have puditry-fodder for the next several months.

But of course, two years into McCain's presidency, they will then be saying to themselves "shit, we are totally screwed. This country is in worse shape than we ever could have imagined. Maybe we were wrong to have put our own immediate self-interests ahead of what's good for the nation."
When will MSNBC start reporting real news on the delegates? I have been watching Chris, David and Keith all week. Chris and even more David have done nothing but talk about Rev. Wright to a fault. At some point I would hope they would turn to a balanced form of reporting and focusing on thr REAL issues that we are all concerned about, econmy, war, food and fuel. When a pastor takes the headlines for 5 streight days, one would think he speaks for a candidate or he is running for office. Please focus on what WE ALL care about, I have seen enough of the same 15 second spot.... Please replace Pat Bucanaan with somebody who understands the problems of TODAY and not the 70's and 80's. Please make some changes or I will need to use my remote to go back to ESPN where the scores are more accurate. The last time I was at a gas station or food store I didn't see the rev. Wright in my checkout lane, I saw other American's facing the same $$$$ problems. Please debate the issues we all have not what took place in a church 5 years ago......
You know what's funny? How the media has pummeled Senator Obama, and then eagerly looks at the polls to see how much he is bleeding! lol

Are you folks reporting the news or creating it? Hmmmmmmm
Someone with an insatiable bias will come on here and talk about Wright again. Look at MSNBCS article today "Between the pulpit and pews, a gulf on Wright". http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24420115/. Oh no, is it possible that pews could disagree with pulpit on any issue? Oh and they are still going to church?

Obama is not Wright.

1. One talks constantly about similarity (no red or blue states but he united states, we are one under the stars and stipes, coming together to solve common problems and bring down common obstacles), the other quickly delves into talking about differences.

2. one is even tempered, and throughful whether he's up or down, attacked or praised while the other is flamboyant in speech and style and contorversial and appears attention-seeking.

3. One is black and focuses on black issues, the other is from black and white background and brought up by white parents and focuses on all issues.

4. One is a lawmaker and aspiring president and the other a pastor.

Let anyone who agrees with everyone close to them that they willingly associate with remain critical on this board after the thoughful denounciation today for which Wright gave him no choice based on questioning his political integrity! One thing we have seen from Obama is whether it hurts or not he speaks his beliefs (as with the gas tax and earlier explanation of why Wright is the way he is, or why voters do not vote their econmoic interest but rather vote focused on less central issues). We should not let him lose because he is not a panderer and a great politician that tells us what we want every 4 years.

How can he sit in church for 20 years and listen to this man. WE all do this every week. CAtholics listening to priests that are rumored and later confirmed as pedophiles. Christians listening to controversial pastors. We all take the best and feed spiritually and sometimes leave behind a few of the social stuff.  

By the way, Wright was not saying the studd of the past 3 days (and not all was bad) for 20 x 52 weeks x 60 minutes. The worst of his previous statements ere condensed in 2 minutes.

How can he sit in church for 20 years. The same reason why I consistently visit my own uncle whose views on social issues are so different that we argue bitterly anytime we make a mistake of allowing conversations to go down that path. Then I try again in 5 years when I had forgotten the lat argument and I believe I saw "signs" of him changing. But we do agree on other issues including as role of family, spirituality so why banish him from my life. I am who I am and I cant change him.
Why is Rev. Jeremiah dominating the news?  Why isn't the fact that Hillary Clinton is such an "elitist" that she can't even manage to use the coffee machine at the local quick-shop or pump her own gas be an issue?  And why not pursue the fact that while she rode to work with that poor guy, she was on the phone the entire time doing an interview on radio?  The MSM picks the topics and the last couple of weeks it's been "get Obama".  Why not "get Hillary"?  Bill Clinton has been blasting caucus states of late.  Why should we vote for Hillary when they think we're nothing?  You all need to do a better job of watching the news.  The Wright issue is DEAD!  What about the Paul vs. Clinton case in California.  Why hasn't it been touched?  We voters are tired of the same old, same old, same old issues that are long since out of our interest.
"Back against the wall"
Serious nonsense there folks..
As soon as Hillary looks like she is within striking distance of overtaking Obama on pledged delegates, let us know.
We understand you folks at MSNBC are handicapped by a natural need to make as much money selling copy as you can.
We realize that in order to do this you must fan the flames of anti racial, religious and class fervor.
Keep it up and there will be more folks boycotting the advertisers of the NBC affiliates that are currently boycotting the ABC affiliates.
You know, as an Obama supporter, I feel confident but hardly unaware that he has had a difficult time of late.  But I think back to all those people who have been supporting him all these months.  And I feel confident that they are still with him.  I don't hear of any groundswell of support away from Obama to Clinton...you just don't see it in the streets, you don't hear it in people's voices, you don't read about it on the blogs.

You see people talking up some small groups of people as being more inclined to support Hillary.  And that's fine.  I don't doubt that both Obama and the Clintons have support that they can draw upon.

But to place the needs and desires of one group over another at this point in time is just ridiculous.

Obama doesn't fare as well as Clinton with certain groups of voters for different reasons (she panders to the white working class, much support among seniors is because they know her better and longer, and many women support her as the "woman" candidate, not all but many).  None of this is to say that he doesn't get their support (not all but many) with the Dem. party behind him for the general.

Obama's problem with white working class voters is the Clinton's constant knifing him in the back at every turn.  Obama has chosen not to do that to a fellow Dem.  He is (in parenting language) CHOOSING HIS BATTLES.  BTW, this is what Presidents do too.

He still has my proud support against great adversity.
"And it's this last point that we think many of us have overlooked: Has Clinton stayed in this race for so long against all delegate math odds because she wants to force Obama's hand on the No. 2 slot?"
*******************************************************

I don't think it'll happen.  If Clinton (somehow) becomes the nominee, Obama won't want to ruin his future chances of election by 'hitching himself to that wagon'.  If (when) Obama is the nominee, he won't want to taint the ticket by adding her as his running mate.

Either way, he'll be avoiding a ticket with her name on it.

http://thepajamapundit.com/
Why am I seeing this mans name and face everyday.This is not news and it sure has nothing to do with the economy.Please let's get back to the issue's.People are hurting out here.
The MSM has injected their own opinions into this election and has purposefully leveled the playing field b/c they are addicted to their ratings.  The truth is that it benefits the liberal media to keep the democratic primary in the forefront and it benefits all the conservative media outlets to have Hillary win for their own purposes and to boost their ratings and arguments among their constituents for the next 8 years.

The Obama campaign has pushed so many buttons and gained so much support by threatening to change the political landscape, that corporate media interests, lobbyists, and conservative media outlets are all after him b/c he threatens to damage their brands and market shares.  The decision to cover Obama's recent issues more than the Bosnia issue was the media's, b/c they are competing for air time with their competitors, not trying to be fair as they should.

I have the courage to vote for Obama in the face of mounting forces that wish to protect their individual economic interests, as opposed to doing the right thing and keep their opinions to themselves and treat the candidates equally.  People should ask themselves if it is more important to vote for the man that wants to help us save our futures or the typical Washington politicians that actually wish to keep fighting the same old divisive fights.

I will never vote for someone who would lie about our troops in Bosnia for their own politial interests.  It is sickening to see Hillary act like Bush in using lies about foreign policy and our troops to accomplish their politial aspirations. I would also never vote for anyone who would practically declare another war with Iran for the same reason.  WAR MONGERING LIES.

By the way, Hillary's gaffe or mispeak about Bosnia is an out right LIE, not a mistake.  Her mistake was not in how she told the story, but instead a miscalculation that people are gullable enough to fall for it.  The media's miscalculation is that they believe that we will fall for their characterization and not to call it a LIE, LIE, LIE.

The media should remember that their biggest problem with Iraq and Bush is that we went there on a lie.  Do you guys actually think that Hillary would not do the same thing?

Obama has not recovered as quickly because it has been shoved down our throats and forced to consider it for longer than the Bosnia issue and OVER and OVER again.  The reality is that Bosnia is about our troops, something that REALLLY matters, not overplaying statements by peripheral players and associations.

WAKE UP!! Vote for the person that tries to be fair to everyone, including his opponent, not the candidate that would threaten the media and other countries, and be willing to do anyting, including LIE about our troops.  Our troops risk their lives and she LIED about their ability to protect her and that is UNFORGIVEABLE.  

I might have voted for Hillary if she managed to pull out the nomination, but after Bosnia, there is no doubt in my mind that if she gets the nomination, I will vote for McCain or not at all.
Senator Obama's back is not against the wall. The Clinton and  McCain campaigns have THEIR backs against the wall because they don't have any platform to present to the American people, they are just against Senator Obama, but the problem is they aren't any better . . . in fact they are worse. They are both basically saying "He is just as bad as us."

Not exactly a rallying cry.
The race thing (especially the Bradley affect) makes me incredibly sad, but no less an Obama supporter...

Maybe there isn't anything more to say other than every day I wake up and try to become part of the solution rather than part of the problem...it comes down to what else can you do...?

I'm often wrong on these races but on your betting lines, I'll put money on the North Carolina race but I wouldn't take the odds on the Indy race.

But remember, I'm usually wrong :)
Should it become necessary in the months from now to identify the moment that doomed Obama's presidential aspirations, attention is likely to focus on the hour between nine and ten this morning at the National Press Club. It was then that Wright, Obama's longtime pastor, reignited a controversy about race from which Obama had only recently recovered - and added lighter fuel.
Speaking before an audience that included Marion Barry, Cornel West, Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party and Nation of Islam official Jamil Muhammad, Wright praised Louis Farrakhan, defended the view that Zionism is racism, accused the United States of terrorism, repeated his view that the government created the AIDS virus to cause the genocide of racial minorities, stood by other past remarks ("God damn America") and held himself out as a spokesman for the black church in America.

Wright suggested that Obama was insincere in distancing himself from his pastor. "He didn't distance himself," Wright announced. "He had to distance himself, because he's a politician, from what the media was saying I had said, which was anti-American."
Explaining further, Wright said friends had written to him and said, "We both know that if Senator Obama did not say what he said, he would never get elected." The minister continued: "Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls."
Looks like Obama's "chicken's are coming home to roost!"
Our local TV station here in Chapel Hill, North Carolina said last night that the polls are tightening because the unusally large number of previously undecided voters were finally starting to make up their minds! Last week-end there were still 15% of people who were undecided. As of the latest poll that number has shrunk to just 5%! Some have gone to Obama, but more have gone to Hillary. Obama has 51% and Hillary has 44%, with 5% still undecided.
As written by EJ Dionne of the Washington Post

Two days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Jerry Falwell, appearing on Pat Robertson's "700 Club," declared: "I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way -- all of them who have tried to secularize America -- I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.' "

Gotta love the double standard
real nice putting wright's face big as life on the front page of your site today. are you sure your checks arent signed by murdouch at fox
why is nobody talking about the zogby poll that has Obama leading 50 to 34 for Clinton.Chuck please look into that.
This man will respond. He has shown incredible mettle in the face of crises with his crazy Reverend. I, for one/ like the fact that he presents himself as being dignified, calm, and thoughtful. I think tht we have had enough shoot-at-the-hip politicians like George W for awhile.
We simply do not need a president like Obama. How can anyone with an open mind really believe that he could sit under Rev. Wright's sermons and not share his racist and vindictive perspective of America. Listen to his sermons and rants about white people. He married Obama and Michelle. He baptised his children. For 20 years Obama believed in this man. Even a few weeks ago he stated that he could no more denounce his pastor than he could the black nation or his own mother. When the heat came down on him and he was in danger politically, only then did he reject him. Even his wife said how painful this was for him to do. Wright is right on only one thing. That Obama said what he did for political reasons only. Does this not prove how Obama really feels about race and America? Is this the work of an honest man for change in government. He is a fake and cannot be trusted to lead our country. How can people say they don't trust Hillary and believe in this fraud?
But Zogby - the most recent polls, taken Wednesday and Thursday, shows Obama up 16 points in NC, and tied in Indiana. That would be the knockout.

But it doesn't really matter, Chuck. He's so far ahead on points, he doesn't need a knockout - she does. Obama can lose both states, and as long as he harvests 80 delegates, he's still on target for a comfortable win in Denver. Wednesday morning he will be within 195 votes of clinching, with about 490 left to pick (217 in primaries, 50 or so elected add-ons and 220-ish other supers. You know he is guaranteed at least 90 from the primaries, 25-30 of the add-ons and will only need a third of the other super delegates.

That's when the flood begins. Hillary might stay in waiting for lightning to strike, but he'll have a majority of the convention in hand, well before the DNC Rules Committee meets, May 30.  
altho you keep deleting my posts....why no one is talking about what clinton advisor said about the people of indiana...why is the press so afraid of the clintons. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN_nQOHj__s
Could it now be that the media will pick up a little piece Tim Russett brought up last week in Meet the Press:
Hillary Clinton jumping on Barack Obama about William Ayers, the Weatherman, is one of the questions, and Jeremiah Wright.  John McCain has now picked up on the William Ayers situation.  Tom Hayden, the former radical from the '60s, has now written a piece which is basically saying, "Time out." And he writes this, "Hillary is blind to her own roots in the sixties.  ...  She was in Chicago for three nights during the 1968 street confrontations.  ...  She was involved in the New Haven defense of Bobby Seale during his murder trial in 1970, as the lead scheduler of student monitors.
"Most significantly in terms of her recent attacks on Barack, after Yale law school, Hillary went to work for the left-wing Bay Area law firm of Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, which specialized in Black Panthers and West Coast labor leaders prosecuted for being communists.  Two of the firm's partners, according to Treuhaft, were communists and two others `tolerated communists.'
"All these were honorable words and associations in my mind, but doesn't she see how the Hillary of today would accuse the Hillary of the sixties of associating with black revolutionaries who fought gun battles with police officers, and defending pro-communist lawyers who backed communists?  Doesn't the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, whom Hillary attacks today, represent the very essence of the black radicals Hillary was associating with in those days?"
Are we going to have a debate in November about past associations and pastors, or we going to have a debate about the war, health care and economy?

Or will we more intelligently go back to the issues?

Dang, is it just me or do Hillary and Barack look they've gone 12 rounds.  Haggard looking might be an apt description.  Wonder what they'd give for a good nights sleep?  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=971485

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google