ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First Thoughts: Obama's back to the wall

Posted: Friday, May 02, 2008 9:31 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Obama’s back against the wall: After Pennsylvania, a lot of folks -- including us -- figured that Obama would win North Carolina by as much, or even more, than Clinton won the Keystone State, thus erasing the gains she made there in delegates and the popular vote. But the race in Carolina is tightening from the double-digit lead he once held; a new Research 2000 poll has him up by seven points, 51%-44%. After several days of Jeremiah Wright dominating the news -- plus some new polls showing an erosion of support -- Obama's back is against the wall, at least in terms of perception and momentum. Of course, almost every time a candidate's back has been against the wall this campaign (think Clinton and McCain in NH, Obama and McCain in SC, and Clinton in OH and PA), that candidate has flourished. Will Obama continue the trend? His appearance on Meet the Press this Sunday might offer some clues.

VIDEO: NBC Deputy Political Director Mark Murray gives his first read on the tightening North Carolina race and previews Tuesday's primary there and in Indiana.

*** The front-runner spotlight: Should Tuesday’s results end up giving Clinton more momentum and extend this race even longer, it could be the worse thing to happen to Clinton. Why? It could invite the dreaded front-runner spotlight. Think about it: None of the remaining candidates has done well when the media spotlight was on them the brightest. The most intense coverage McCain received was in the first six months of 2007, the worst six months of his campaign and the period of time he was the closest thing the GOP had to an inevitable nominee. Clinton's toughest coverage came from about October 2007 to March 1, 2008, the worst six months of her campaign and the time she was considered the inevitable nominee. Now, it's Obama's turn in this version of "kill the man." Remember that game? Where the goal was for everyone to tackle the person with the football? Welcome to political kill the man, in which the media and opponents have successfully tackled McCain last year, Clinton earlier this year, and Obama now. Of course, someone has to survive this war of attrition. We're not going to find new candidates to tackle, are we?

*** 96 hours to go: Indiana and North Carolina are the two biggest states left on the calendar (sorry Puerto Rico, we know you may have a higher turnout than Indiana and more voters, you won't have more delegates). And because of the fairly large and swing nature of Indiana and North Carolina, it's fair to say that if either candidate sweeps the contests, it's going to be a major turning point in the campaign. An Obama sweep, and Clinton might not last the week. A Clinton sweep, meanwhile, and a contested convention is guaranteed.  A split decision, and the trickle to Obama by uncommitted superdelegates probably continues and Obama keeps up his successful limp toward the finish line.

*** The over and under: So with this in mind, let's have some Vegas-like fun. If Vegas were charged with setting the line, our best guess is that Clinton would be giving three points in Indiana, while Obama would giving five points in North Carolina. This doesn't mean this is the prediction for either state we're making, this is simply the margin of victory projection that we think would invite an even amount of money being bet on each candidate. If you actually could find someone to take a bet on the margin of victory for both candidates, you'd need to ask yourself this question when looking at the polling: Where will undecideds go? Does Obama nab any of these undecideds? There are some analysts who believe Obama won't win many of them in either North Carolina or Indiana. And if that's the case, watch out -- both states could be VERY surprising. Undecideds haven't broken for Obama since February. Is this a race deal? So while folks aren't lying to pollsters about support for Obama, those who want to vote against Obama on race are saying they are undecided.

*** Bill works it hard in Carolina: The Clinton campaign clearly seems to smell something in North Carolina. Bill Clinton is barnstorming the state like nobody's business on Monday. He's got nine -- count 'em NINE -- stops on Monday.  Phew. One of us has argued that Hillary wouldn't have gotten this far without Bill, and can't get across the finish line because of him. BUT, if she pulls the upset in North Carolina, it will be Bill's victory. It's just stunning how well he's working these small southern towns. In fact, whoever the nominee is, Bill may be showing the playbook for how to use the former president: send him to these Ruby Red Southern states and let him do his thing. He may be gaffe-a-week prone on the national stage, but sending him to the rural white parts of the South might be a smart move if he'll agree to do it -- if Obama's the nominee. Perhaps the only way he'll agree to campaign this hard in the fall in these areas is if his wife's on the ticket. And it's this last point that we think many of us have overlooked: Has Clinton stayed in this race for so long against all delegate math odds because she wants to force Obama's hand on the No. 2 slot?

*** The day in delegates: Today, Obama camp unveiled another former DNC Chair, Paul G. Kirk. Yesterday, Clinton added four superdelegates to her total; Obama added two, including a switch from Clinton. Clinton got four New York add-ons (Obama will get three after the Illinois convention this weekend) and CT DNC member John Olsen (president of the state AFL-CIO). But Clinton lost a key IN supporter Joe Andrew, a former DNC chair appointed by Bill Clinton. Obama also got TX DNC member John Patrick, the state AFL-CIO vice president. The count: SUPERDELEGATES: Clinton 272-250; PLEDGED: Obama 1,490-1,334; OVERALL: 1,740-1,606.

*** Louisiana special watch: In Louisiana tomorrow, there’s a special election between Don Cazayoux (D) and Woody Jenkins (R) to replace Rep. Richard Baker (R), who resigned his seat to take a lobbying job. And as it stands right now, after the Democrats captured Denny Hastert’s seat earlier in the year, Democrats are well positioned to win a second GOP-held district. The reason, says David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report, is that Cazayoux appears to be the better candidate. “Democrats have a better candidate… I think the candidate is important in a special election,” in which turnout is usually low. The Republican groups -- the NRCC and Freedom’s Watch -- have tried to nationalize this race by linking the conservative Cazayoux to Obama and Pelosi on taxes and health care. But Democrats believe that by nationalizing the race, especially bringing Obama’s name into the mix, will help boost the turnout of African Americans, who make up about 35% of the district.

*** Don’t you forget about me: By the way, Guam votes tomorrow (or is Sunday or did it take place yesterday; that whole International Dateline confuses us). Four pledged delegates at stake.

*** On the trail: Clinton campaigns in North Carolina, stumping in Hendersonville and Greensboro and speaking at the North Carolina Democratic Party Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in Raleigh; McCain campaigns in Colorado, where he holds a health care town hall and speaks to reporters before heading to Arizona; and Obama has a morning event in Hammond, IN, then goes to the Tar Heel State, holding a rally in Charlotte and also speaking at the J-J Dinner in Raleigh. Also, Bill Clinton campaigns in Indiana and Michelle Obama is in North Carolina.
 
Countdown to North Carolina, Indiana: 4 days
Countdown to West Virginia: 11 days
Countdown to Kentucky and Oregon: 18 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 186 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 263 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

If NC is close or Obama loses, the MSNBC commentators can take their bow.  A week of solid Rev. Wright, under the pretense of that's what the voters want, is taking it's toll!  Too bad that, if the media is going all negative, they didn't balance their coverage.  Everyone knows there's plenty of negative to report about Hillary!
Eh, just more trying to create an artificial race where there isn't one (because after all, if we don't pretend there's a race, you guys don't have much to do for a few months).

Obama's back against the wall? Really. Don't think so.
Interesting that Obama had brought the Pennsylvania race to within 5 prior to that primary yet Hillary still won by 9.  

Is it possible this "tightening of the race" in NC is equally as misleading?  In fact, the tightening to 7 is lower than the 5 in Penn so using the same math, he could still win it by double digits....
Obama has been hit hard by external circumstances, and he has survived! So the effects are short term. look across the horizon, and see him emergining as the nominee. No gimmicks!!!
Obama's back is not to the wall. That is MSNBC spin. Last night, watching Hardball, at the end of the show, Chris said to the panel it is really close and the guests did not what to say.  Chris said, "I know, but we have to say it" (is close).  

Then MSNBC refuses to run the story in Indiana about a defense plant in Valparaiso, IN named Magnequench. In a Hillary AD she talks about how this company made components for guided missles and the company was purchased in China.  Hillary blames Bush for approving this sale, but Huffington Post and ABC News reported that the sale was during Bill Clinton's administration and approved by President Bill Clinton, thus costing Hoosiers 200 jobs. This one of the biggest stories of the campaign, yet MSNBC refuses to run it.   It seems to me that MSNBC is protected by the First Amendment, but not protected by the Clinton camp.  Please post this message as it is accurate and factual.
Maybe, just maybe, Obama's back wouldn't be so "up against the wall" if every news media organization didn't keep constantly flashing rev. wright's photo and quotes as part of their breaking news.  

It WAS a story, but not THE story.  Now its keeping focus away from some pretty underhanded tactics by the Clinton machine (repeated illegal WVWV robo-calls, staged Florida voter protests, and 527 ads that violate the "issues" restrictions.  

I'm an independent, and yes, I'm an Obama supporter (despite voting for Bill twice) because this kind of dirty, cheap politics has to stop.  
America asked for the video of the Clinton advisor calling people from Indiana names.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-MzByUHIzw&feature=email

Notice George Stephanopolous standing right there.
We didn't call it "kill the man." In Grand Forks, North Dakota, we called it "Cough-up."
the newest zogby pollhas obama ahead of clinton in nc.c. by mroe than 20 points...where is your blaring headline/ about that this morning?
for that matter, why is your reporting especially chris matthews and the commentator of race for the white house, so lopsided in favor of clinton? every night this week and last ech found numerous excuses to talk wright/obama, whie ignoring the fact that clinton cannot win.
I think without Bill Clinton Obama would have buried her by now.  But he has made one of the most impressive, tireless, consuming campaign course for his wife that I do have to tip my cap for him even if I can't stand the Clinton's.  

If Obama had an instantly recognizable and famous small town surrogate like him it would make the world of difference.

Instead, he has to carry the burden of an attacking media, GOP, Clinton Brand, the entire catalog of political and pundit opposition sans the blogosphere.

It's amazing he's event still in this, but he's got integrity, he's honest, and fights for it.  Thats why I like Obama.
Of course it is reasonable to assume the opponents will go after their opposition.  

And I don’t personally care who Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, Andrea Mitchell, Pat Buchanan or David Gregory plan to vote for in November.

Their reporting of the “bitter” comment as well as the Rev. Wright controversy was and continues to be appalling.

All these journalists and pundits did and continue to do is talk as if Rev. Wright was going to blow up the country. I don’t  give a damn how anyone in the media spins this - it was race baiting reporting. And it scared the country. Senator Obama’s “bitter” comment was completely over-blown. Why is it that I understood immediately what Obama was talking about, yet no one that I recall put his statement in the manner it was intended?

It’s fine for McCain or Hillary’s surrogates to mislead the public. They’re politicians.

Is it the media’s job to do it as well? I don’t think so.  

I can only voice my opinion as both a viewer and a voter. I did not go to journalism school, I was never a politician.

But from what I’ve been hearing, I believe the mainstream media in this country have become lazy, shallow and too afraid to think independently. In other words, dishonest. That is a shame.

That’s how we got into Iraq.

When are we going to become a progressive, sophisticated country? Never.

Especially not with 90% of the media we have today.

Hillary Clinton and Bill O'Reilly - two supporters of this awful war we have in Iraq. Yet everyone applauds them.
The only reason that Obama's back is to the wall is because the media has taken to trashing Obama with stupid distractions like Wright.  The media wants the race to continue so they can keep profitting from the indecision.  The media has ignored Hillary "Republican" Clinton's foulups and has completely ignored McCain's numerous verbal blunders.  It's time for the media to stop trying to make the news and get back to reproting the news.  It's time for the media to start focusing on the real issues instead of headline grabbing distractions.

Go Obama!
Here we go again with MSNBC spin...I'm dizzy.  You are not fair, nor are you balanced.

RPC--today--polls say he's up by twelve.  They average the four most recent polls to come up with this number.  They simply do just select one so they can sit and spin.

In essence, your not really telling the poll truth, MSM.

Shame on you.

Quit with the Clinton Support and be fair and balanced.

America is not stupid.
Hillary did fill the Gap from double digits to only seven points; But Obama denounced his radical Pastor remember??  That was a pre-planned facade to make it look like Obama was appalled by his long time Pastor, "as if after 20 years he never knew how radical he was.  Well if people are that stupid to think that lovely speech he gave demouncing Rev. Wright was honest and true,  "personally I don't" - then maybe his lead will go back up to double digits again.
Once upon a time, a President to voters to vote for the candidate who made them think, not the candidate who tried to make them afraid.  That President was named Bill Clinton.

This cycle Senator Clinton is trying very hard to stir your fears and your cynicisms.  Why?  Because Senator Obama has asked us all to think.

Senator Obama has told us that we are the change we have been waiting for.  He has told us that in our unity, we (the People) have power to change Washington and get real reforms finally passed (like healthcare, and fixing our schools!)  

Senator Obama has given us the tools to come together.

If you are not afraid of being inspired, or too cynical to want to find hope again, please check out this link:

http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

You can check to see if you agree with Senator Obama on the issues facing us.  You can read some thoughts from his supporters (on the blogs).  You can join with those in your area who are already working to be the change this Country so desperately needs.

Our Country is on the wrong track.  If we all work together we can get our Country back on track and fast.  Divided we have little chance of doing anything to solve our really big problems, we can nibble around the edges (as Washington has done for years), listen to some more endless partisan bickering and watch politicians score meaningless political points until the cows come home...

OR we can come together around a common purpose -- getting our Country back on track -- and roll-up our sleeves and get to work and fix our problems block by block, town by town, county by county, state by state and finally Washington itself.

Yes we can!!  Don't let anyone tell you we cannot!  No one person can stop we the American people in action.  I believe that we CAN do anything if we put elbow grease behind it, how about you?
This race is over.  No matter what happens Obama will finish the race with over a 100 pledge delegate lead.  He would have the pledge delegate lead even counting florida and michigan.

The democrats have never not given the winner to the pledge delegate leader and they aren't about to do it to the first serious african american candidate.  This race is all a myth.  It is all for television ratings.  
Why is it that all Hillary had to do was Win in Pennsylvania, yet Obama, the front runner, has to beat her by double digits in NC?
He knocked her 30 point poll lead down to 9.3%. She has knocked hos 17 point lead down to 7, so far.  I think his "win" of 20+ points is bigger and more important considering she has a strong hold in Pennsylvania!

Why don't you run the following You Tube video showing just how Clinton feels about those "white people" in Indiana?  I challenge you to run this on your loop 24/7 like you did for the Rev. Wright.  THis just shows how sick the Clinton's and their supporters are.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/2/93316/53926/838/507664
Well, after reading about the gas tax panderings of Hillary and Mc Cain , and reading about their Bomb Iran thoughts, it appears possible that Americans might just elect a president less competent than the incumbent.
The potential campaign betweens these two will make all the campaigns of the past seem like genteel tea parties. The Clinton mafia will do what they do and the Mc Cain will have such a field day with the real Clinton scandals ( as opposed the manufactured ones  for Obama) that Mrs. Clinton will finally get what she deserves and what the Obama campaign has been reluctant to do   ( Read the Politco article )
It does not bode well for the US or the world.
In North Carolina Obama has always led Clinton, but up until these latest polls the number of people who hadn't made up their minds was very large. There were many, many stories here in NC about how ambivalent many people were. There were record numbers of undecided voters. This week more are choosing. Obama is still leading, and has actually gone up several points in the latest numbers to the upper 40s to as high as 51%, but Hillary has increased from numbers in the mid 30% range up to the low to mid 40% range. Most polls here now show about 5 to 8 percent still undecided. It will probably be close.
OMG!!


Msnbc and race, nothing new there, so if a voter is undecided the voter is racist. What a joke msnbc is with their joke reporting.  It's always about race with msn, and has been right from the beginning with Eugen Robinson, and the Bradley effect, as to why New Hampshire voters did not vote for Obama.  

The reason "typical white people" like me don't vote for Obama is because "we" like the other candidate better. Not because he is black, race has been played by the Obama campaign over and over again, and now it's catching up to them.  That's too bad, it really turned me off to Obama and group, Clyburn and the rest.  

The color of his skin has nothing to do with, my position, it's the way the campaign has used Obama's color to drive a wedge through the Democratic party, and call people racist who don't vote for Obama. That's what has turned people off to Obama, we are not stupid out here... There's plenty about him for the "typical white person" to vote against other than his color.  Obama is a neophyte and it shows on every level, that's Obama's problem. Not that he is (half black and half white.)   As soon as Obama stopped the soring talk, flying above eveyone like a hang glider, and started to talk policy he has struggled every since.  Hum wonder what that is about????  

Also about Rev Wright, Obama and Michelle chose Rev Wright, he did not chose them.... They had a choice and he was their inspiration.  That is not "Typical White Person's" fault either.  Oh it's not Hillary's fault, and it's not John McCain's fault.  It's Obama and Michelle fault.  So just suck it up and move on, blacks are far more racist than white people, just look at the way "they vote"  msnbc are such race baiters. We are tired of it out here and it's going to cost your candidate the election with your low ball underhanded tacticts.
INTERESTING

STEPHANOPOULOS & ABCNews Hosting town meeting for Clinton.
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashabh.htm

What Obama wishes he could say
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10010.html

What Obama wishes he could say
http://www.236.com/news/2008/05/01/how_superdelegates_can_break_u_6205.php
Wow ... I've never seen so many Obama cry babies .. if you can't take the heat then get out of the damm fire ...
MSNBC, Chuck Todd, Morning Joe, Chris Matthews, David Gregory, and Pat Buchannan, sucks! your  reporting about the issues or should I say non issues is worst than FOX!
Advice for Chuck Todd--don't try your hand at poker--you face will give you away. Time and time again on TV when talking about Obama and the campaign we can see he is so anti-Obama. The race is over for everyone except the media that keeps trying to find things to keep it going.
Media should show some backbone and report this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RR_vyHTfqro

This is FAR WORSE that the so-called bitter comments.
I'm not really one for blogging.  Especially now, as I've tried here several times but have not been "approved" for who knows what reason.  

I still think there's a story about the dirty underbelly of the Clinton policial machine: WVWV robo-calls in a series of states to attempt to confuse voters (directed at African-Americans per NPR), the staged Florida delegate rally the other day, and the 527 ads that clearly violate the rules and favor Hillary.

I know the media just wants this to go on and on because they want a story, but you are harming the process by your biased choices of what to cover.
Meanwhile, in the "McCain Lies" news front that MSNBC and the rest of the elite corporate media refuses to cover:

From http://thinkprogress.org/

McCain said yesterday of Bush's ridiculous "Mission Accomplished" banner: 'I thought it was wrong at the time.'"

But while the White House has actually acknowledged making an error, McCain himself used the term “mission accomplished” when talking about the Iraq war on at least two occasions in 2003:


– “Their morale could not be higher. This is a mission accomplished. They know how much influence Saddam Hussein had on the Iraqi people, how much more difficult it made to get their cooperation.” [This Week, ABC, 12/14/03]

– During an appearance on Fox News, host Neil Cavuto said, “many argue the conflict isn’t over.” McCain answered, “Well, then why was there a banner that said mission accomplished on the aircraft carrier? Look, the — I have said a long time that reconstruction of Iraq would be a long, long, difficult process, but the conflict — the major conflict is over, the regime change has been accomplished.” [FOX, Your World With Neil Cavuto, 6/11/03]

The fiction that this not particularly bright and intellectually incurious person is some sort of military genius and foreign policy expert continues to be propagated by the corporate media.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=971485

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google