ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama on NBC's Meet the Press

Posted: Sunday, May 04, 2008 1:41 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
About the same time Clinton appeared on ABC, Obama sat down with NBC's Tim Russert to discuss Jeremiah Wright, gas taxes, Clinton's comments on Iran, and the Obama-Clinton race.

On Wright: "Well, obviously it's distracted us. I mean, we ended up spending a lot of time talking about Reverend Wright instead of talking about gas prices and food prices and the situation in Iraq.  And so it, it's, it wasn't welcome. But, you know, I think that the American people understand that when I joined Trinity United Church of Christ, I was committing not to Pastor Wright, I was committing to a church and I was committing to Christ... [W]hen Reverend Wright, who married me and baptized our, our children, when he made those statements, or I learned of those statements that I found so objectionable, I, I felt that they didn't define him. And so I spoke in Philadelphia about these issues and tried to construct, you know, a, a conversation about issues of race. But when I saw, this week, him come out and speak in a way that was just as divisive, that didn't explain or apologize, but rather worsened some of the comments that he had made previously, I felt it was very important to make clear that that's not who I am, that's not who I stand for. I don't think it represented well the church or the African-American church. And I had to make a clear statement. Hopefully we've been able to put it behind us."

On what he's learned from the episode: "Well, when you're in national politics, it's always good to pull the Band-Aid off quick... But life's messy sometimes, and, you know, it's not always neat, and things don't proceed in textbook Political 101 fashion. And so, you know, when I reflect back, you know, what I'm proud of is that, in the speech in Philadelphia, I think I made a contribution to the overall dialogue about how we deal with race in America. And I think that me denouncing his words without denouncing him was, at the time, the right thing to do. You know, I'm, I'm sorry that he didn't see an opportunity for him to reflect on the justifiable anger and pain that he had caused and to maybe, you know, suggest to the American people that's not, that's not what he believed. But clearly, you know, one of the things when you're running for president is that you don't have -- all this stuff is happening under a spotlight, and you've got to deal with it quickly."

On the gas-tax debate: "[T]his defines, I think, the difference between myself and Senator Clinton.  This gas tax, which was first proposed by John McCain and then quickly adopted by Senator Clinton, is a classic Washington gimmick. It, it is a political response to a serious problem that we have neglected for decades. Now, here's, here's the upshot. You're looking at suspending a gas tax for three months.  The average driver would save 30 cents per day for a grand total of $28. That's assuming that the oil companies don't step in and raise prices by the same amount that the tax has been reduced... Now, Senator Clinton says that she's going to use the windfall profits tax to fill it. First of all, she's already said that she's going to use the windfall profits tax for something else, as I have, and, and that is to invest in clean energy and, and other important measures. So that money, she's already spending twice. More importantly, nobody thinks that George Bush is actually going to spend--or is actually going to sign a law for windfall profits taxes, so that's not going to happen this summer. So what this is, is a strategy to get through the next election."

On Hillary's "obliterate" Iran comment: "Well, it's not the language that we need right now, and I think it's language that's reflective of George Bush. We have had a foreign policy of bluster and saber-rattling and tough talk, and, in the meantime, we make a series of strategic decisions that actually strengthen Iran. So -- and, you know, the irony is, of course, Senator Clinton, during the course of this campaign, has at times said, 'We shouldn't speculate about Iran.' You know, 'We've got to be cautious when we're running for president.' She scolded me on a couple of occasions about this issue, and yet, a few days before an election, she's willing to use that language."

And on what the remaining superdelegates should do: "I think the superdelegates, by rule, can make their own decision. I think the superdelegates are going to take a look not at momentary snapshot polls, but they're going to take a look at who's run the campaign that can bring about change in American and can actually govern after the election. And the number of new people that we've brought in, the organizations that we've set up in all 50 states, the enthusiasm, the energy that our campaign has displayed indicates to me and should indicate to the superdelegates that the American people are ready to move in a new direction, and that's what we're offering. And I'm confident that, if I am the nominee, that I offer Democrats the best chance of winning in November."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I have voted Democratic since I was old enough to vote.
And I will vote Democratic again this year. If BO gets the nomination I will write Hillary Clinton's name in. I will never vote for the inexperienced BO. I can't believe it took him 20 years to know what his Reverand thought. AND he let the man marry him and baptize his children.
He also stood p and said he could NOT renounce this man just last month. Talk about flip flop.
Hmmm, I wonder why it is that so many Obama supporters gravitate to MSNBC. I don't think it's because they want to watch campaign news coverage that challenges their brand of conventional wisdom. It seems they want to preach to the choir and know where the church music is most harmonious.
I watched the MTP Russert and Obama show this morning, and I don't think I've ever heard Russert speak in such a sustained hushed and meek voice. The questions some here have complained about weren't tough, they gave the illusion of toughness while giving Obama a friendly environment to offer his anti-Wright comments to a national audience. No tough rebuttals from Russert. Not one. Softballs all.

From Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/hillary-says-that-regarding-rev-wright.html

"Sunday, May 04, 2008
Hillary Says That Regarding Rev. Wright, "We Should Move On"

Today, during a Town Hall meeting presented by "This Week with George Stephanopoulos", an extremely poised and articulate Indianapolis voter, Michelle Skinner, a Republican, posed a beautifully targeted question to Clinton:  

"Sen. Clinton, my question is: Do you think the discourse, the controversy going on with Rev. Wright, do you think this is relevant to Obama and his policy? Do you think this has accomplished anything or should we drop it, should we move on?"

Clinton: (trapped): "Well, we should definitely move on."

In this case--let's take her at her word.

Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/hillary-says-that-regarding-rev-wright.html
You don't have to be a Philly attorney to see where
Tim Russert stands, 100% for Obama!
wow, i just got interested in this race because we vote on tuesday. i was going to vote for hillary because, you know... that's the democratic thing to do.

but obama is clearly more principled and aligned with higher values than hillary. obama is proposing sustainable growth while hillary is talking about short sighted fixes and a new war with iran.

also, the people who support hillary are very negative (only talking about reverend wright, how obama can't get the white vote) while the supporters of obama tend to be very positive and make better sense.

this 62 year old white female just found a new candidate!
previous post:  Americans can see through all the sound bits,....  How about repeating sound bites of what Senator Clinton said to Bill O'rielly, last week:  "GOD BLESS US RICH PEOPLE".  Don't you think some of her blue collar workers would be offended by that.  I was!
Blue Collar White Women over 50"

as someone who is also working clas and a white woman over 50, i second that statement>

just say no to CLINgONs
Agree with brian s 2:57-but you won't post this-you never do.
As Jon Stewart said, elite, I want elite.  I want someone better than me.  Why has elite and liberal become such bad words?  I don't consider Senator Obama to be elite, but it's not a bad word, unless it's coming out of Hillary's mouth.  And, by the way, great interview on MTP with Russert this morning.  No softball questions like Hillary gets from little George.
Will MSNBC and FirstRead speculate as to why Hillary can't seem to overtake Obama if she fails to win both Indiana and N.C. even after Obama was faced with almost two weeks of non-stop Wright talk, Rush sending in the Republicans to vote for her and the incorrect information mailed by the women's voters group (wonder who they support) to mostly Obama supporters which was misleading and will, no doubt, reduce partitipation of Obama voters.
i think wright is a legitimate issue. Just as much as mccain calling his wife 2 words that rhyme with "runt" and "prollop" is a legitimate issue. These are the defining issues for the next 100 yrs. Who cares about Iraq and healthcare reform, and social security, and global warming. It is only elitists that care about such isues.
You bloggers need to turn the computer off and go outside and play with your children or your dog or rake your neighbor's yard or do something nice for your community.  No one really cares about your pro-Clinto or pro-Obama or pro-McCain rants.  Most of you folks need to quit being so petty and hateful.  Get a life bloggers!  PEACE--OUT!
To: "So who is OBAMA?"  If you are going to base an argument on something this important on Obama's connection to Rev. Wright and his 20-year membership in the Trinity congregation, I believe you owe it to yourself and the people you are trying to convince to learn more - much more - about Rev. Wright and develop a reasonable picture of precisely what Obama heard during those 20 years.  Are the video clips legitimate reflection of the sermons from which they were taken? (In 2 cases - 9/11 and 'damn America' - they are not.  The 9/11 clip, in fact, was a quotation of statements made by a former US Ambassador to Iraq - and clearly identified as such.)   I have paid attention - because I was as offended by those clips as anyone - and the only absolutely objectionable sermons/statements I have been able to find were the clips from Dec 07 referencing HRC, the sermon that was discussed in the Rolling Stone (and that led to Obama's rescinding his invitation to Rev. Wright), and the spiels he went into at the press conference last Monday.  If you can find others - for which Obama should be condemned for 'sitting through' - then you are welcome to continue your argument.  Empty words based on baseless assumptions will (or at least should) convince no one.  Please.  Do your homework or stop harping on this made-up argument.
He brought me close to tears. You can see and feel the honesty and caring emanating from this man. Yet, he is being torn down by the Clinton campaign and by most of the major media. He articulated why he did not distance himself from Rev. Wright: he wanted to and did give the Rev. an opportunity to repudiate his prior statements. What did the Rev. do? He enforced and amplyfied his prior statements. At that point, the Senator denounced and repudiated him. The Senator gave the Rev. the opportunity to redeem himself and the Rev. spat on it. This Senator is a great man. It takes greatness to do what he did, knowing it would hurt him politically, he nonetheless gave the Rev. the opportunity to correct his ways. May God bless America, and may we elect Senator Obama as president of these United States.
He brought me close to tears. You can see and feel the honesty and caring emanating from this man. Yet, he is being torn down by the Clinton campaign and by most of the major media. He articulated why he did not distance himself from Rev. Wright: he wanted to and did give the Rev. an opportunity to repudiate his prior statements. What did the Rev. do? He enforced and amplyfied his prior statements. At that point, the Senator denounced and repudiated him. The Senator gave the Rev. the opportunity to redeem himself and the Rev. spat on it. This Senator is a great man. It takes greatness to do what he did, knowing it would hurt him politically, he nonetheless gave the Rev. the opportunity to correct his ways. May God bless America, and may we elect Senator Obama as president of these United States.
Is patty,sd,ca seriously supporting Obama or is someone just posting stuff in her name to be funny (it is funny btw if thats the case!).
What would Obama do if Iran nuked Israel? Tell them: "That was not nice. I'm sorry, but we're going to have to punish you. You can't sell your Iranian made Persian rugs in the U.S., until you say you're sorry." ?
Response to several posts:
1.  If one is old enough to remember the 90's both the good and the bad, then one should question Hillary's close associations.  Someone stated you can't choose your family but you can your pastor.  Well, you can choose your husband. He humiliated her in the most public way.  He was impeached based on lying.  She chose to stay.  I believe they have been married for over 30 years.  By the reasoning in the post then she will have marital affairs, be impeached, oh and also pardon felons upon leaving office.  
2. I would like to make 2 points about Rev. Wright.
He is 65 or so?  Barack is 46.  These are far different generations.  It is very possible that Barack was attracted to the church to finally find a place to belong.  I did the same thing growing up as a military brat.  I wanted to put down roots.  When he joined the church he was 26.  How much have all of us changed since we were 26.  Isn't it possible that his worlview grew as he grew? I absolutely understand how he handled all of this.  He didn't handle it politically.  He tried in every way to prevent any harm or hurt to his "church family" which became symbolized by Rev. Wright.  A church family sees pastors come and go but the congregation is the church.  Even this morning he expressed his intention to continue as a member of the church, the church family that has 89 ministries for the people of the southside of Chicago and around the world.
Finally, I absolutely do not understand how anyone who has been really listening to Obama, reading his books, following his career can ever believe he somehow is hiding his "real" beliefs which would be those of Rev. Wright.  This would make the most extreme conspiracy theory even more extreme!  Do his critics think he will morph into Rev. Wright as soon as he is sworn in on the BIBLE? Please remember he is biracial. His father who was Black would have been the target of any hate he may have.  IT was his father who abandoned him. He talks about his mother who was White with great love and affection.  I just don't understand how anyone can truly believe that Obama is a clone of Wright.  Well, yes I can.  Those people are only repeating sound bites.  If you can remember the 90's and even at this time, the Clinton's have always been associated with questionable financial transactions. There is an actual trial in California at this moment alleging additional illegal activites in fund raising by them.
Obama has never been accused of illegal activity in the Rezko trial; the Clintons have - over and over and over. Last go around it was the vast right wing conspiracy.  This time it is the far left conspiracy.
Those of you who are too young to remember the 90's, do some research. And yes, you will be electing "the Clintons" and all that involves.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=979248

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google