ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Does Hillary play nice?

Posted: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:19 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Does Hillary play nice? The big question if Clinton stays in the race is this: Just how will she campaign? Yesterday, there were no negative TV ads or attack mailers. But Clinton did stress that she can win the general, implying that Obama might not be able to. "I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she told USA Today, citing her support with white working-class voters. It's comments like that one that might drive more supers toward Obama pretty quickly. Why?  Because they know the math, but they don't want her to spend three weeks making a case that Obama can't win. It will only weaken him. Here’s what Obama backer Chris Dodd said yesterday, per NBC’s Ken Strickland. "You're going to be asking a bunch of people [in West Virginia] to vote against somebody who's likely to be your nominee a few weeks later? And turn around and ask the very same people a few weeks later to reverse themselves and now vote for [Obama] on election day?"

*** A signal to superdelegates? Yesterday in West Virginia, Hillary said: "I'm staying in this race until there's a nominee." Was that a signal to superdelegates -- telling them that if you want me out of the race, come out and endorse Obama? In a way, it seemed she was almost daring supers to come out and endorse Obama. Yesterday, four did (see below), but it was just four. It that a sign of how Democrats are still afraid to be against the Clintons? Take a look at that list of undeclared supers. How many of them want to be able to always claim to the Clintons, "Hey, we were never against ya?" Of course, the Clintons will know who wasn't with them, so we're not sure what these undeclared supers will be buying by staying silently for Obama.

*** Bill’s kill rate: As we and others noted in the build-up to Tuesday’s contests, Bill Clinton worked his tail off campaigning for his wife. According to NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann, Bill famously did more than 50 campaign stops in North Carolina – all told, they encompassed a whopping 41 of the state's 100 counties. BUT: Only 18 of those counties went for Hillary Clinton. (The former president actually spent more than one long day campaigning in a string of towns, which all eventually went for Obama and by no small margin either.) For her part, Hillary Clinton did 22 stops in the Tar Heel State, for a total of fifteen counties. But she won only THREE of the counties she visited (Gastonia, Iredell, and Henderson). But where she did win, she won by a wide margin. Of the counties in her column where she or her husband campaigned in North Carolina, her AVERAGE margin of victory was almost 20 points. What about Indiana?  The former president hit 35 of the state's counties during his visits to the state. His wife won all but eight.

*** Deal or no deal? Everything we're hearing is that a deal over Florida and Michigan could be cut in the next few days. The Obama campaign apparently realizes they have plenty of room to give. The hurdle isn't Clinton and Obama anymore, though; it is folks in the DNC who believe those two recalcitrant states still need to be punished in some form, so states realize there are consequences to doing this in 2012. The latest offer from Michigan is a 69-59 split, with supers going however they want. The two state parties don't want to be halved, meaning their delegate votes become .5, a la Democrats Abroad. But it's clear to us that DNC types want some flesh on this issue. Many hate the idea of Florida and Michigan getting full delegations simply because now it appears their delegations won't make a difference in the process.

*** That’s some price tag: How do we know the superdelegate story has gotten absurd? When superdelegates begin selling their vote for $20 million. Per a report, California superdelegate Steven Ybarra is putting up his support for that amount. “Ybarra wants every cent of the $20 million to go toward registering and educating eligible Mexican-American voters… He thinks his own party is crazy for not aggressively pursuing the Mexican-American vote especially with such a large Mexican-American population in the southwest.”

*** Team Edwards climbing aboard? Today, word is out that Edwards manager David Bonior is officially endorsing Obama. What about his former boss? Well, John Edwards will be on TODAY tomorrow. Will we see an endorsement from him? Also of note, Elizabeth Edwards is testifying on Capitol Hill today. We're sure some reporter will get her to comment on whether Clinton should stay or go and we're sure Edwards has an opinion about it.

*** The delegate drip: Obama picked up four superdelegates to Clinton’s net of one yesterday. George McGovern is not a superdelegate, but Obama did pick up a switcher, a Virginia DNC member. Here are the counts: PLEDGED: Obama 1,588-1,422; SUPERDELEGATES: Clinton 273.5-260; OVERALL: 1,848-1.695.5. The superdelegate count is the closest it has ever been. Remember that on Super Tuesday, Feb. 5, Clinton had a 90-delegate advantage, per our count. Obama is 177 from the Magic Number of 2,025. There are 261.5 undeclared superdelegates. And there are still two delegates from Indiana and five from North Carolina to be allocated.

*** On the trail: Clinton holds rallies in Charleston, WV and Sioux Falls, SD and a town hall in Oregon; McCain appears live with Regis and Kelly, raises money in New Jersey, and attends the Time 100 Gala; and Obama is in DC, where he meets with Democratic superdelegates and raises money. Also, Bill Clinton campaigns in West Virginia.
 
Countdown to West Virginia: 5 days
Countdown to Kentucky and Oregon: 12 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 180 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 257 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hillary Clinton NEEDS to play nice for the good of party unity.  At this point in her campaign, she needs to continue to spread her message - but lay off of attacking Barack Obama.

I think a good strategy for both of them is 'focus their fire' on John McCain - as he has been getting a free-pass for the last few weeks.

http://thepajamapundit.com/
Hillary will campaign to win. Nothing has been decided yet. Obama is a deeply flawed candidate whose baggage increases more and more each passing day. He has no accomplishments, just some lofty rhetoric, and he has his extreme liberal voting record. Obama won't even win half of the remaining primaries. Even the Democrats know the man is flawed and is not the answer.
To the remaining super's, it has been said that they don't want to declare yet out of fear of being on the wrong side of the clinton machine, but did they ever think, now that Obama has it locked, that by not declaring that you could end up on the wrong side of the new leader's machine. If it is self preservation these gutless wonders are worried about, then it makes sense that they would be with the winner, after all there are cabinet posts to be filled and high level positions to be awarded in the Obama administration. Just food for thought
Thanks for the updates.

Also, it amazes me how people are complaining about AA's voting for Sen. Obama in such large numbers because he is black. Did it ever occur to some of you racists that AA's are voting for Sen. Obama BECAUSE HE HAS INNOVATIVE IDEAS that will help the country???  Could it be because he has integrity and is honest???  Could it be because Sen. Clinton is corrupt and froth with scandal???  Here's a surprise for you... African American's do have BRAINS, and have the ability to decipher intellectually the same as anyone else.  AA's have voted for whites for many, many years, so to conclude that they are voting for Sen. Obama merely because he is black is offensive, and shows just how racist you are to make such an outlandish statement.

OBAMA, 2008!
Which is the correct expression right now... "Good things come to those who wait" or "waiting for the other show to drop?"  Is it anxiety or anxiousness we are facing right now while the process continues on between Senators Obama and Clinton?

I know Senator Obama must lead the reconcilation of the party as the nominee.  But shouldn't other leaders step up and start protecting his back?
I read Sen. Dodd's comment earlier this AM and was struck by how pertinent it is. With the inevitability of Sen. Obama why would any Democrat continue to campaign against him? Very destructive.
There is no "deal" to be cut with Michigan and Flordia! The DNC totally screwed those two states out of their representation in this election. Whatever happened to the 'Count All The Votes' and 'Every Vote Counts' messages the Democrats blathered on and on about after 2000 in Flordia? Now, just like with the superdelegates, the Democrats do all their voting by making backroom deals where the common voter has no say.
Bill Clinton was as effective in NC as he was in Iowa--not at all.  A curiosity, granted.  But a dated one.  Perhaps he should be opening for recycled 70s groups at festivals.

Mrs. C does not seem to be taking advantage of the 'grace period' extended to her.  There will be no NH bounceback of sympathy this time; no 'Pennsylvania is waiting' this time; no 'Barack believes in the bogeyman' this time.

This said, I guess it's okay to not push her off the stage, but it does seem rather classless and, I would suppose, grating to the other very worthy candidates who left when it was obvious to them.

Another thing:  I verily believe that Mrs C does want to be president and DOES believe she is the best candidate. It's just that no one else does (in terms of relevant voting majorities and, importantly, MONEY), the fundamental defining difference about her and her campaign that neither she nor her advisers has ever grasped.
Well, when your a Liar,shallow and hollow of experience what do you expect!HRC, doesn't know the difference, As she is a Washington self serving useless paper hanger again what do you expect!
What smart people the super delegates have become, making money off their status. I thought that you lefties were against capitalism though. Perhaps there should be a windfall profit tax on these SDs?
I believe I told you that her time in most of the counties in NC was going to be a waste.  I may not be a PAID political pundit but I know my home state and all of my family is there.  There was no way she was going to win the major areas ( the Clonton's are not liked...regardless of the AA margin)  i believe i also told you the Gov would make NO difference..he is almost disliked as much as the Clinton's.

As for her now blantly throwing out the race issue...is anyone surprised?  And you guys hypothesis that Obama may put her FAT BUTT on the ticket...right!
Two days after the Indiana and North Carolina primaries, with a little sleep and time for reflection, I am even prouder of Senator Obama.

He did not pander to the American people, he did not resort to pointing out all of Senator Clinton's flaws, he simply stood his ground and reminded everyone (especially the news media) that ultimately this race is about OUR future, not his, or Senator Clinton's past.

That, all by itself, is a HUGE change in American politics!

YES WE CAN!

Obama '08/'12
I'm so sick of this ridiculous "without African-Americans, Obama would have lost" shill that Hillary keeps playing.  She claims that she has a "larger coalition" of voters, but let's look at these last two primaries for a minute...

In BOTH Indiana and North Carolina, Obama won:
He won first time primary voters.
He won people with college degrees.
He won urban voters.
He won white voters aged 17 to 29.
He won ALL 17 to 29 year olds.
He won among people aged 17 to 64.  Yes.  He won people 17 to 64 years of age.

So, really, I mean, do we really think Clinton has a larger coalition?  And will the media keep puppeting this argument for the Clinton campaign without analyzing the numbers?
It is not that the superdelegates are "afraid" of the Clintons, they are concerned that with the voter base Obama has established he can not win in the General Election. This has created a dilemma within the Democratic Party. Do not think for one minute that people are naive enough to acknowledge caucus victory's as a mandate for a candidate to win those states. Especially since a majority of these contests took place BEFORE the Wright and "cling to their religion & guns" incidents took place. Hate to break this to the Obama supporters but your candidate can not win the general election against McCain without a majority of Clinton supporters. No matter how much you despise the woman, without her help, Obama will not win the Presidency. Period.
'...I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she told USA Today...'

Uhhhh....

Crazy Hillary ?

If you have such a 'broad base'.......
WHY DID YOU LOSE ?

If you're such a great candidate ....

WHY ARE YOU LOSING ?

Face it, you're too dishonest and corrupt to be elected

GAME OVER !

The only good that comes out of this is that Hillary is removing herself from consideration for VP

Obama, if you want to appeal to women, consider Claire McCaskill as VP
She might help you carry issouri

Richardson, Biden, Dodd and Edwards will also do...

Obama '08
Integrity counts
Character counts
My how nice - now we can BUY Superdelegates!!!!
What a great party - first they kick out 2 HUGE voting states FL & MI - then the party favors obama - fearing the loss of the AA votes,(racist) then they tell Hillary to step aside - for the good of the party - such fair play in the USA.
The GOP is looking better every day - actually McCain is a much better candidate than obama ever could be.
The fact is that nobody has the # of delegates needed to claim the nomination. I hope the black vote is enough to elect Obama
Hillary should stay in the race, whether the DNC likes it or not the party is already split.  The majority of Hillary voters will NEVER vote Obama, they will vote McCain in Nov.  The media trashing of the Clintons since the beginning of the process will never be forgiven.  Obama was only subject to a slight taste of what will be thrown at him in the General Election, and he will never win, because he can't take being vetted.
Under Obama---the democrates WILL LOSE in Nov.
This will be yet another defeat for them as it was
with Gore and Kerry....it is just not going to
happen. As a democrate----I will not vote MCCain,
however with Obama as the nominee---I WILL NOT VOTE.
Do not say that we will come together in Nov.
it will not happen with Obama. He can not beat McCain
the Republican machime will see to that, and he will
also not get a good majority of the Clinton
base, even if Hillary ask that we support him
Folks---it is not going to happen.
He is unexperienced and is too much of a risk in these times we live in. While he make make for a good
Senator from Chicago---he is not presidential material.
Get ready for McCain---thank God he is not Bush
Hillary needs to stay.  Hillary needs to back off Obama.  Hillary needs to remind the citizens of the economy during Clinton.  Over and over again.  Hillary needs to stand tall and punch. Hard.
It's time the superdelegates removed the fence polls from their backsides and do what they were chosen to do - make a decision. They can put an end to this, but fearing repercussions, they won't do that. I think they need to look at the fact that their fear of making a decision brings their re-electability into question. Who wants a politician that can’t make a decision even with most of the facts already in and a clear choice to be made? If they can't take a little criticism for their choices, then they should not be in politics.

It's too bad the needs of one person are set above the many...
Sacrifice has never been one of Hillary's strenghts...
The lessons in life of strenght and sacrifice propel the journey we most honor..
May we all work together in our times..
She has no choice but to play nice. At this point, she is in the race because super delegates are LETTING her stay in. The moment she starts to damage Obama's chances, they will simply "pull the trigger" and move en masse to endorse him. We'll call it the "Feinstein Effect".
Chris Dodd says: "You're going to be asking a bunch of people [in West Virginia] to vote against somebody who's likely to be your nominee a few weeks later? "


Exactly Senator Dodd. He's some news for Mr. Dodd. Many, many voters do not like Obama. Given the choice, those voters will vote for someone else. Obama does not have broad based appeal among the voters. This is why he loses a lot of primaries, even when he's the likey nominee. Obama voting base is nearly 100% of the AAs and upper class white liberals. That's it. No else will vote for him.
This has gone on long enough and it's time she steps aside. The only reason she has been allowed to stay in the race this long is because she is Hillary Clinton. If the math were reversed and Obama was trailing by this much he would have been forced out a long time ago.
Alright John Edwards!!!

He's the COOOOOOOOOOOOOOLEST!!!!
I think that Senator Clinton should finish the race on a positive note and not go negative. As an Obama supporter, we should allow her to bow out with dignity and grace. Stop attacking her because at some point we will need her support to win the presidency.
DEMOCRATS UNITE!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's not clear why the Democrats want Hillary to quit now. If she did, the voters in most of the remaining primaries would still vote for Hillary, and in some states like Kentucky and West Virginia, Hillary would still win. How bad would it look for Obama to lose those states against a non-existent opponent?
I think Hillary should take this time to assess her campaign and then make the smart decision of backing out. The superdelegates need to come out in full force and endorse Obama. They need to stop being afraid of the Clintonites and do what is best for the party.
Hillary should stop since there is no way for her to win and the verbal attacks she and Bill have given to superdelegates who go for Obama are making them timid.  Joe Andrews, their loyalist, did not even bother calling them before going public with his switch - because of how much the Clintons attack who they view as "disloyal."  

Hillary, please, don't hurt more Superdelegates by forcing them to potentially lose voters in their districts by going for Obama.  If you step down, we can end this without more people getting hurt.
'...folks in the DNC who believe those two recalcitrant states still need to be punished in some form, so states realize there are consequences to doing this in 2012...'

EXACTLY !!
If you break the rules, you should be punished
It was the DEMOCRATIC POLITICIANS in Nichigan and Florida who broke the rules.

Why not disqualify ALL SUPERDELEGATES from Michigan and Florida ?

Might even make them pay for their own expenses....

Otherwise, you encourage other states to try this in 2012

During the Obama Administration, the DNC has to:
1. Purge Clintonista 5th columnists
2. Rework the Primary mechanism
  We need MANY LESS Super Delegates
  Elected officials, only
  Clear and understood penalties for states that   defy party rules
More 'winner take all' states (for smaller staes ?)

OBAMA '08


THROW THE BUMS OUT

DON'T BRING THE BUMS BACK
Bye bye.
I honestly don't think Hillary playing nice is in her nature...she has been a creature of politics too long.

 She may be "playing nice" in campaigning but if she's privately telling people that Obama can't win then she is still hurting the party. This thing is bigger than her. It is about which party can best address the big issues facing this country. Republican McSame is NOT the answer. Besides, John Paul Stevens is 88-years-old and WILL be replaced by the next president. Roe v. Wade goes bye-bye and abortion becomes illegal in this country if a Republican is in the white house next January. So, all of you women who claim you will vote republican if Hillary is not he nominee, stop lying !!! McCain does not have the interests of women on his agenda. He needs to placate the religious right.
Sadly, whether you admit or not, GWB did have more experience than BO when he took office.  People did not believe he had enough experience in judgment, always creating a mess when he ran a business such as his baseball team, but they bought into his rhetoric of compassionate conservative, and feeling-good guy whom you can drink a beer with.  They gambled on him, and that's what you get when you lost your gamble.

BO is selling the same package, bottled slightly differently from the left. BO's rhetoric is new politics by trashing the Clinton administration to be the same as Bush's, and making feel-good speeches on the empty words of "hope and change".

BO had not much else to offer, as far as experience and accomplishments are concerned (what the hell "community organizer" means is beyond me as qualifications/experience to be a president is beyond us). The only glimpse we can have is the type of people he had himself surrounded in the past 20 years.

For the economy: he makes housing deals and benefits through the aids of Rezko and wife, 15 years of friendship. He gets money from Rezko to get himself elected.

For spiritual and inspiration guidance: He is deeply associated and educated by Wright. He writes and sells books on Wright.

In decision making: For his political convenience, he changes his rhetoric 5 times to explain his friendship and mentorship with Wright.  His indecisiveness or lack of suggest that he is just like GWB who continued "reading" to children when the country is under attack.

For internal affairs: He makes connections with Ayers.

Now he is surrounded by a group of dems election losers.

They do not show confidence just as a gamble getting into electing Bush as a gamble getting out of Bush for a Bo.
I am Hillary Clinton Supporter although it looks like Obama will be the nominee it is my opinion he will not win the general election. I  belive that we are handing over the election to the republicans again.
A bunch of weak candidates such that no one can outright win. If superdelegates had ethics, they'd wait to the convention and THEN make each candidate make their case -- comprehensively -- and them in true Congressional style, issue an up or down.

If it has to be these two, it ca ONLY be these two for the ticket. All that would remain would be the sequencing. There's a significant argument to make that Clinton can be Obama's kingmaker, in that she would give him the credibility he currently does not have. And she would be a very fine vice president, and there's no shame in that either.

Clinton would have won this if she had simply and firmly said, after SC, that Mr. Clinton does not speak for her. Her constant references to him are what has killed her. She has never articulated a vision that is specifically hers. (mind you, Obama has not articulated really any vision, but that's neither here nor there).

The simple fact is that now, politically, they need each other. To paraphrase Sandra Bernhard, "with the other, they are nothing". They run together, it's over, and McCain can fold up his tent.
Our country is on the verge of collapse, due to the imperial rule of King George W., and his court.  

Our children are being sacrificed to war, to protect oil interests, and to satisfy the ego of a wanna-be dictator - "The Decider".  

Our economy is on the brink of bankruptcy.  The war, and irresponsible spending, has been charged on our "Bank of China" credit card.

Our people are losing homes, health insurance, and jobs.   Our kids are facing a bleak future.

What do we Americans do when we have a crisis?  We make sacrifices and tough choices.   We unite to tackle the problem.   We roll up our sleeves, and work side-by-side, as equals.  Remember what we accomplished after 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina?  

We now face a choice of more Bush/McCain rule, or we can put aside our petty differences, and resentments, and take back our country.   The Rush Limbaugh types can only succeed in dividing us, if we allow it.   They feed on stirring up bigotry, fear, and animosity.  

As far as Hillary Clinton,  there is no need to hurry her out.  More elections won't hurt, and has some real benefits.  It allows more people to participate, and get excited about our democratic process. Hillary needs time to come to terms with the situation, find a way to save face, find funding to pay off her campaign debts, and choose her own way to exit gracefully.  She is transitioning, and has, hopefully, stopped the negative campaigning.  
Her supporters are also hurting, and are deeply disappointed.  

Extending compassion, and understanding, is the only way we can heal, and unite, our Democratic Party.   We should welcome independents, and disillusioned Republicans, to join the fight to save our country.   We can limp to the general election as a damaged party, or go with one that is strong, expanded, enthused, and united.  We can have an exciting, history-making election.

We can't afford to be sore losers, or gloating winners.  If we unite, we're all winners.  If not, we're all losers.  

Isn't this the kind of change we've claimed we're seeking?

 
As these things often go, it will come down to money.  If Senator Clinton has to loan her campaign money from her personal funds, more rational behavior many be the result.

The real problem is that Senator Clinton disrespects the electorate by constantly coming up with new rules that allow her to win.  We are smart enough to see through it.  And her inability to run a good campaign, handle the day to day operations as well as cash flow should give all of us pause.  Why would she be rewarded with the Presidency?

I understand that her supporters are disappointed.  I started out wanting to vote for her.  But her actions convinced me otherwise.
Not really trying to question your accuracy but do you happen to know why the Obama count on their website is so different from yours?  Shouldn't they be tracking their number very closely?

 OBAMA CLINTON
Contests 32 16
Total Delegates 1856 1698.5

33 PLEDGED DELEGATES
needed for a majority
(of pledged delegates)
 169 TOTAL DELEGATES
needed for the nomination

I am a high school teacher and my students cannot understand why Bill Clinton is so desperate to get back to the White House and why they have played the dirty Politics of Desperation. Young people are watching ,reading, and listening.They realize the numbers just doesn't add for her. Why doesn't she use these remaining states to campaign for Senator OBAMA.
I am all for allowing Hillary to continue to PLAY at running for president. BUT and this is a big but, I do not want any money sent to Senator Obama for his properly managed campaign to go to her. She has a lot of money (ill gotten) she does not need or deserve $50.00 sent to Senator Obama by a person who only makes $50,000. a year.
I think the undeclared super delegates are COWARDS, kinda reminds of the lack of backbone they display in the congress. This race is OVER yet they remain on the fence.  I think it is very disingenuous for them not to flock to Obama, since this thing is OVER.  They suggest that some unforeseen bomb may fall on Obama making him unelectable.  Why don’t they just be honest and say they don’t want to elect the black man.  I’m sure if the shoe were on the other foot they would have declared Clinton the winner along time ago.  The undeclared supers are quickly becoming the embarrassment of the Democratic Party.

1) it's obvious SDs will let this play till June.
2) it's obvious why John Edwards is not in the race. Though he talks tough, he is not a leader. He should have come out for Obama yesterday. It would have calmed this talk of blue collar issues & helped open WV doors for Obama.
3) The real story still out there is how much debt does the Clinton campaign really have?
guys, FYI:

a "magic number", taken from sports competition, is any combination of wins and losses that produces a tournament or series win.

"2025" is not a "magic number".
It should be interesting to see if Hillary can play nice. She hasn't so far. And this is quite the upset for her since she thought she'd uncontested throughout this primary. It'll take her a few days to come to a reality check. I'm willing to give it to her if she plays nice.
If Hillary has such a broad base why is she LOSING??

Its time for her to bow out, tell her base to support Obama and be an ADULT.

Hillary is begging for the SD to seal this things and end it for her...she has to know she can't win ..but she can't bail out and disappoint her supporters..  She wasting money and doesn't even have enough money to go on .....without borrowing from her own pocket....SD end this thing...Barack Obama is the winner ..fair and square..save Hillary's dignity and end this for her and the Democratic Party...We need all the time we can get to begin the challenge with John McCain.  I hear Hillary's call ...don't you?  

Thank you and GOD Bless America
Hillary could be very helpful, and would go a long ways to repair her fractured image as a petulant egotistical narcissist if she turns her attack solely toward McCain. That also includes Bill and Chelsea attacking McCain; while renouncing the gutter politics of the RNC. It would be a great sign of party unity if she attacked the politics of the 527 swiftboaters; speaking out against the RNC attack ads about Ayers, Wright, flag pins etc, while emphasizing McCain's failed approach. I believe her fund raising would be enhanced if she is not perceived to be a hinderence, but an asset to the Democratic nominee, Barack Obama.
Obama does not have the requisite number of delegates for the presidential nomination; he has no presumptive lock on the nomination.  The nomination process calls for all states to vote and if the candidates are short in delegates, then the superdelegates select the best experienced, qualified candidate for the presidency using their independent judgement and that is Sen. Hillary Clinton.  So the campaigning continues until all remaining states have voted.  The black racism in the North Carolina win cannot trump the nomination process.  The nine Indiana counties that Obama won out of over 100 counties cannot trump the nomination process.

In sabotaging the nomination process by forcing Sen. Clinton to quit, Obama, the superdelegates and the media are ensuring that Obama will crash and burn in November and the Democratic Party will be a train wreck in November.  Radical left wing liberal George McGovern lost every single state except one state in the general election, and this will be no different with radical left wing liberal Obama. McCain will be the next president.  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=994674

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google