ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Obama, McCain to campaign together?

Posted: Saturday, May 10, 2008 4:44 PM by Domenico Montanaro



From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones
BEND, Ore. -- This election year has already broken fundraising and voter participation records, but it could also break the mold for how campaigning is done during a general election.

Think of hand-to-hand combat, but with words, something akin to a rhetorical duel on policy that plays out right before voters’ eyes, in state after state, without the interruption of pesky journalists asking questions about issues the candidates believe are not important. This time they would be in control.

It could happen.

Politico reported that Republican strategist Mark McKinnon has suggested the two candidates agree to campaign in some states together, to attend joint town hall meetings and debate each other without a moderator. McKinnon called the town hall meeting McCain’s “best format” and said joint campaigning would test Obama’s “claims that he wants a clean fight on the issues.”

McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said, “John McCain has repeatedly encouraged these types of appearances with his opponents in the past, but in order to extend all due respect to Sen. Clinton, we will look forward to welcoming the arrangements when the Democrats have actually chosen their nominee.”

Obama said Saturday that he was open to the idea, should he become the nominee.

“I think that’s a great idea,” he told reporters after touring PV Powered, a solar energy company. “Obviously we would have to think through the logistics on that. But to the extent that I, should I be the nominee, if I have the opportunity to debate substantive issues before the voters with John McCain, that’s something that I am going to welcome.”

The Illinois senator also suggested McCain’s relationship to the Keating Five savings-and-loan scandal was fair game during a general election. New Obama backer Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio brought up the Keating Five association as part of a string of attacks on the Arizona senator during his introduction of Obama yesterday in Albany but had dropped the reference by the time he delivered his second introduction that evening in Eugene. Obama was asked whether such comments fit into his idea of a positive campaign.

“Congressman DeFazio obviously delivered a speech that wasn't my speech,” he began. “I don’t have any doubt that John McCain's public record about issues that he's apologized for and written about is not germane to the presidency. You know, I was just asked previously about a whole host of issues and associations that were a lot more flimsy than John McCain's relationship to Keating Five. What I've said is, you know, I can't quarrel with the American people wanting to know more about that and me having to answer questions about that.”

When asked whether he was ignoring Clinton and looking ahead to the general election as he campaigns in these final races, Obama suggested it was time to start focusing more on McCain.

"We only have six contests left in the Democratic primary,” he said. “We are getting to the point where somebody is going to be the nominee; we’re not going to have a lot of time to pivot. And John McCain’s’ been getting a free pass. For the last two months, he’s been able to go on various tours and make assertions that I think are questionable, and it’s important that we Democrats, both myself and Sen. Clinton remind our constituencies that that’s the ultimate price -- win in November. And that’s what I will continue to focus on.”

And he said he hoped to campaign soon in Florida and Michigan and to seat their delegations: “We’re going to be actively campaigning there, and we are going to try to go campaign there soon, and I think that we are going to make sure that the Michigan and Florida delegations are seated so that by the time we get to November I don’t think that’s what is going to be on voters’ minds. I think what is going to be on voters’ minds is whose got a better plan to help make sure that my retirement is secure or rebuild out manufacturing capacity in this country.”

As he left the podium and headed back to his bus, Obama was asked to respond to a column by conservative Bob Novak who reported that his wife Michelle had nixed the idea of Hillary Clinton as a running mate. The senator joked that his wife did not talk to Bob Novak on a regular basis.

The press conference was held in part to hit McCain on energy issues. Obama criticized the Arizona senator again on his gas tax holiday proposal calling it a "classic Washington stunt” and slammed him for his opposition to taxes on the windfall profits of oil companies to help families, to make price gouging by oil companies a federal crime and to mandates ensuring more use of renewable energy.

“Barack Obama has no experience standing up to special interests in the energy sector, in fact he voted for the oil companies’ sweetheart bill in the Senate,” Bounds writes. “John McCain has been a champion for energy solutions, and he didn’t support the loophole ridden, pork barrel energy bill written for the special interests like the one Barack Obama voted for and supported."

Obama heads to home to Chicago later today and will hold no public events tomorrow when he will celebrate Mother’s Day with his family. He said he was not planning on going to church in order to spare the congregation the media circus.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Really, really great TV

Obama stuttering and pausing - and McCain scratching his head because he forgot the question...

Is anyone else scared?
Good idea. I like that.
But, I wonder why is it taking McCain so long to announce his VP?
Or, does he think that announcement would motivate Democrats to unite very quickly, which obviously would spoil his enjoyment of the never ending ‘operation chaos’ in the Dem party.
Honoring his wife on Mothers' Day -- that boy has his priorities straight! Enjoy your family time, Barack.
I think the joint Town Hall Meetings is a great idea! McCain likes these and Obama does well, too.
But I also think there should be some huuuge rallys  where both candidates could deliver their most inspirational message...let's see how McCain does with that...
Mrs. Obama is on the corect side of intelligent thought. Mrs. Clinton belongs no where near a Democratic Presidential ticket. However,...

In addition to her qualifications, meritorious public service and apparent cohesion with Senator Obama, Senator Claire McCaskill would complete the "dream ticket" that would serve to assuage the dissolution, disillusion and disappointment felt by the fairer fifty-one percent of the population.

OBAMA-McCASKILL in 2008.
Oh no! Now that Senator Obama has expressed interest in this idea, the media will SWEAR that he PLEDGED to do it if he doesn't agree later! AAAARRRRGGGGHHH!

lol
Good. Obama is looking good. He appears tougher than the media has given him credit for. I do agree with Obama that the keating five is a legitimate issue. If flimsy associations are fair game so should events that affect policy like the keating five. I am a student so the keating five is a very important issue to me.
I absolutely love the idea of retail politics "without the interruption of pesky journalists asking questions about issues the candidates believe are not important". Perhaps I wouldn't feel so strongly if they were less "pesky" and more "journalist".
That will last about one or two times.  Obama is so much quicker on his feet (has had so much more practice in the Hillary debates) and knows the issues so well, Mcfossil does not stand a chance. Actually for a political addict, like myself, it would be fun to watch.

Hillary will prepare for the Paul v Clinton fraud trial and will be busy with that problem

After May 20th Obama will become the nominee, the polls (Obama v McSame) will for a short time tighten, then spread apart with Obama having a 10 to 12 point lead.
That will last about one or two times.  Obama is so much quicker on his feet (has had so much more practice in the Hillary debates) and knows the issues so well, Mcfossil does not stand a chance. Actually for a political addict, like myself, it would be fun to watch.

Hillary will prepare for the Paul v Clinton fraud trial and will be busy with that problem

After May 20th Obama will become the nominee, the polls (Obama v McSame) will for a short time tighten, then spread apart with Obama having a 10 to 12 point lead.
This is a great idea.  Obama and McBearings side-by-side on the issues and often is a great idea.  They should do 50 minutes for the canidates with a twenty minute rebuttal for the first to go, and then one hour town-hall style.  Do at least one on CSPAN.  That would be great for the process.
I strongly disagree with the idea of Barack Obama campaigning alongside John McCain from city to city, holding old style debates. The old style debates would be fine, campaigning together would not. Everyone knows that McCain is NOT as popular as Obama and would have a very difficult time drawing the crowds that attend Obama's rallies. This proposal is a way for McCain to gain exposure to the HUGE Obama crowds. An occassional debate here and there between the two candidates is fine, but I hope Senator Obama rethinks this proposal and sees through Senator McCain's ultimate motive.
No Way!  The republicans just want a free-ride because they don't have the money to spend on events and ads like the democrats do.  They also want to ride on the coat-tails of Senator Obama's ability to attract large crowds.  Thanks, but no Thanks!  Boy, the republicans have a lot of nerve.  Attacks ads on one hand and let me come with you on the other hand. Astonishing!   We'll see you at the debates!  Go spend cindy's money, not ours.  

Great idea, but first we have to get beyond Hillary's Hillbilly Initiative.

When she wins in WV and KY (although perhaps by a closer margin than expected), if Indiana's 15,000 vote edge was called a huge win that "shocked the world," try to imagine what her spinners will do with a real "victory?"

And yes, the elephant in the room is not merely the Republican mascot, but the very real concern over Obama's personal safety after he has so brilliantly  and courageously crushed the Clinton Wehrmacht.


BTW, Hillary's Hillbilly Initiative is quite simply summed up:

IMAGINE THAT I'M JUST LIKE YOU ONLY WITH $100,000,000 AND A DEGREE FROM YALE!!!  WE ARE PRACTICALLY COUSINS!
I would love to see this type of campaigning and welcome it with open arms.  I think big-wig moderators have unfortunately suffered terribly due to the ABC debate. This would provide an avenue where the voters can actually gauge, interact, decide and determine the best candidate.  No one-sided, bias questions and no cherry-picked answers (hopefully).  There is far too much at stake for our great nation for people not to actively become involved.  It saddens me that so many voters are willing to vote solely on what they've just been informed of until now.  There are so many huge and important issues that this country now faces, and personally don't think any of the three remaining candidates have throughly addressed them.  May the best man (or WOMAN) win :)!!
I support Barack Obama. But it does not matter if you like Bill or Hillary. It does not matter if you like Barack or Michelle. What matters is that you keep this election in perspective.
John McCain recently said: "I will look for accomplished men and women with a proven record of excellence in the law, and a proven commitment to judicial restraint…" Does anyone know what ‘judicial restraint’ is code for? Conservative Judges.
The next president will most likely be allowed to appoint judges to the Supreme Court. He wants judges who look down on rights of women, the right to choice which is something no man and I mean NO MAN has a right to dispute with women. We can never, ever know the situation and must work together to make sure that the right to choice is protected, safe, and used as infrequently as possible.
Recently John McCain’s own pastor problems have been touched on by the media. John Hagee recently apologized for his remarks about Katrina being caused by a homosexual pride parade. When pressed about why he changed his mind, he said that he hadn’t changed it and that God wiped out New Orleans to stop the parade.
Do we want a President who stands firmly beside a man who refuses to acknowledge that what he has said is despicable? Do we want a President who will overturn the right of women to choose? Do we want a President who has said that he will continue the Bush tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans? Do we want a President who admits he doesn’t know much about the economy in tough economic times like these? A President who wants to back-track our failing healthcare system?
I hope not. I hope that we can realize that either of these two democrats would be far superior to anything McCain has to offer. So let’s end the fighting amongst ourselves and not choose the nominee based on who is better than McCain, in that fight they both win. Instead let’s hear them out on the issues. Let’s compromise and use a little bit of the respect we all so desperately want to receive.  Let this race play out, cleanly, and I bet we will find we are the stronger party for it.
I hope this helps someone out there.
You know, even though he is a Republican, I really like John McCain and always have.  I think he is probably one of the most rational, level-headed Republicans out there and have always admired him for standing up for very tough issues that have landed him in a heal of water with his fellow Party members.  I am a staunch Independent and have been so for the past 5 years, since I've been able to vote.  I just couldn't vote for current President Bush although Kerry wasn't exactly my greatest image of President either.  I support the Democrats this time around again, and am leaning toward Obama.  However, I am open to being convinced by McCain that he just may have what it takes.  Unlike most voters, my main focus and concerns are on the issues we are up against.  I could care less about the candidate's personal lives, religious affiliations, love lives, etc.  At the end of the day, I just want to make sure we have someone in office who implements decisions that will restore this great nation back on the right path.  I really like the idea of the candidates debating in such aa candidate, down-to-earth manner!!  
The Obama camp needs to find more creative and effective ways to address this real and increasingly growing disfavor, or else, the historic nature of this political season ends on election day in November and we all bid hello to President McSame.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-race10-2008may10,0,4930097.story
Yes!!  Let's take this back to the days of good old fashioned campaigning.  No pundits!!  Great idea people, let's get on board.
Sen. Obama has now taken the delegate lead.  Please get on top of things First Read :)!!
Barack Obama on a stage without stupid lapel pin/middle name questions? Great!  McCain trying to say anyting without cue cards?  Priceless.  OBAMA for POTUS
Campaigning together... now that is change we all can agree on.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1007650

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google