ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Clinton: Rahm vs. Ted

Posted: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:07 AM by Mark Murray

The New York Times says that Rahm Emanuel “called to assail Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, for remarks he made when asked about the possibility of Senator Barack Obama of Illinois choosing Mrs. Clinton, of New York, as his running-mate. ‘I have a lot of respect for Ted Kennedy, but I don’t know how the hell he comes off saying that,” said Mr. Emanuel, who has ties to Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama and has not endorsed in the race. ‘The gratuitous attack on her is uncalled for and wrong. He is a better senator than that comment reveals.’ Mr. Emanuel was responding to an interview with Mr. Kennedy on Bloomberg Television’s ‘Political Capital With Al Hunt.’ In the interview, Mr. Kennedy said he did not think it was possible that Mr. Obama, whom Mr. Kennedy has endorsed, would pick Mrs. Clinton for his ticket should he clinch the nomination.”

“Mr. Kennedy’s office said that his remarks had been misconstrued and that he had not been talking about Mrs. Clinton when saying what kind of candidate Mr. Obama should turn to. ‘Senator Kennedy believes Senator Clinton is qualified to be vice president but doesn’t think it’s likely given the tenor of the campaign,’ said Mr. Kennedy’s spokesman, Anthony Colley.”

The Washington Times' Seper continues to write about past Clinton scandal issues, focusing  today on those infamous Rose Law firm billing records. "According to the documents, given to the Library of Congress by the estate of Sam Dash, former ethics adviser to Whitewater Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, Mrs. Clinton also knew that her former Rose partner Webster L. Hubbell was both the focus of the firm's billing concerns and a federal conflict-of-interest investigation, in which he was suspected of lying in a sworn statement to regulators about the firm's representation of a failed Arkansas savings and loan.”

“While Mrs. Clinton told the public at the time that Mr. Hubbell's March 14, 1994, resignation as associate attorney general involved an ‘internal billing dispute’ with his Rose partners that ‘likely would be resolved,’ three months earlier she had been advised by another Rose partner, Allen Bird, that the ‘billing problems were very serious,’ according to the newly disclosed records."

The LA Times checks in with spiritualist Jean Houston, who gave advice to Clinton in 1994.

Wearing a white rose to celebrate Mother's Day while campaigning in Pendleton, OR, Bill Clinton spoke to the working-class constituents who have been Hillary's stronghold thus far in the campaign, NBC’s Sandy Luong notes. Acknowledging the unfair distribution of wealth in America, the former president emphasized the need for a drastic change, one that focuses more deeply on the middle and working class who have been notably overlooked under the current administration. "Ninety percent of the gains of this decade have gone to just 10 percent of the Americans at the top of the pyramid," Clinton said. "Forty-three percent of the gains of this decade have gone to the top 1 percent of Americans."

Per NBC’s Abby Livingston, Bill Clinton also put the issue of his wife's 2003 Iraq war authorization vote back on the table. In Pendleton, Clinton boasted of Joe Wilson’s and Valerie Plame's endorsement of his wife. "They're for Hillary for president, and they're on television saying, 'She's the best person to end this war.'" Clinton added, "Why? Number one, Joe Wilson knows that most of the Democrats that supported that resolution actually read it, and it said that force was authorized only if the inspections failed. And the UN wanted some threat over Saddam Hussein not because of nuclear materials, but because there were unaccounted for biological and chemical materials, and we needed to look around. It was a ‘look-around-with-a-club resolution. Not 'let's-support-George-Bush-and-blow-'em-away-whether-they-fail-the-inspections-or-not.'"

Livingston adds that Clinton returned to the subject in Baker City. "They know that the way the war authorization vote has been portrayed is not quite accurate. It said that the president could attack Iraq if they fail the inspections. They did that in spite of what they were authorized to do, not with it.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Apparently the truth hurts, Rahm.  SNL, which will now be skewered by the very same Clinton loyalists who praised it as "telling it like it is" only 8 weeks ago, hit the nail on the head Saturday night.  It's a shame it's come to this.  If I were a feminist, I would be outraged at the way HIllary is acting.
Sen Obama should avoid putting Clinton on the ticket.
The republicans are relishing this chance.They spent the last 2 years doing opposotion research on her and this would allow them to dish out all the BAGGAGE that Obama avoided doing in the primary.
I suspect that, at this point, this stuff is just a distractor in the "race to the White House".

I really think what we will see from this point forward, if much doesn't change, is the Clintons becoming very marginalized in the Dem. party.  It is just the way things are playing out.  And no, I don't think it had to be that way.

Obama for our best future.
Senator Kennedy spoke the truth.  Senator Clinton should not be on the ticket at all.  Her actions and the way she has campaigned would make it impossible for her to serve in that capacity.  I would actually like to see her replace Senator Reid as leadership in the Senate.

The Clintons have a long history of some unsavory behavior, and it boggles the mind that the press has concentrated on Senator Obama's minister when there are real actual problems with the Clintons.

And, one more time.  Morning Joe is almost watchable when Joe is gone.  I would like to see MSNBC allow some guest hosts with the goal of picking someone of some intelligence to host that show.  I like Rachel Maddow, but I am quite sure there are others.
In Pendleton, Clinton boasted of Joe Wilson’s and Valerie Plame's endorsement of his wife. "They're for Hillary for president, and they're on television saying, 'She's the best person to end this war.'" Clinton added, "Why? Number one, Joe Wilson knows that most of the Democrats that supported that resolution actually read it, and it said that force was authorized only if the inspections failed.

---------------------------------------------------

Uh...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/28/clinton.iraq/index.html
Emanuel needs to back out of Kennedy's face!

My G-D, does'nt Barack have enough to overcome, just by being the first African American candidate, without having to be saddled with EVERYBODY'S DAMN BAGGAGE???

It is Hillary, and Bill's fault that the 'chains they forged in life', should not have to be carried by Barack, and those of us who support his bid for the Presidency.

The Clinton scandals will forever haunt them. That is their burden, not ours.
Ted eats people like Emanuel for lunch, and drowns  them after dinner. Emanuel is getting a little out of his league tangling with The Great Kennedy!
Too little, to late.  It is time for Hillary to bow out on an up note.  She has fought hard and I will give her that but reality is reality.  Time to take on Republicans.
Obama 08
Sorry Bill, that explanation of Hillary's vote for the war, just doesn't hold water.  Firstly, most Americans at the time knew that GWB was going to use that resolution to go to war.  The 21 Democrats who voted against the resolution (and 1 independent - Jeffers and one Republican - Chaffee also knew that this resolution would be used to go to war, no matter what). Secondly, the NIE, which Hillary admits to not reading, cast serious doubt on the idea that there were any weapons of mass destruction.  Finally, it doesn't explain why Hillary voted against the Levin/Reid amendment which would have required Congress to give the final authority to go to war if the U.N. did not support us in this effort.  

Sorry, Bill, this is the age of the internet.  It's all available to the public to read and not only was it shameful that Hillary used these votes to position herself for a run for the presidency, but the fact that you now are re-writing history with your revisionist interpretation, speaks to the deception which is a prelude to the type of administration that we could expect from a Clinton third term.  You not only disrespect us by trying to reshape our memories but you tarnish your own reputation by stating such nonsense.  

Thank G-d this primary is over and that you Clintons will be out of the picture.  This is as much as about you lying as it is about your wife's numerous lies. I mean sniper fire in Bosnia, reported to us by her on at least three separate occassions.  As James Geffin once said, 'It is amazing, the ease with which the Clintons are able to lie.'

Bill, Obama's Hide Park speech on the Iraq war is brilliant and maybe you should read it.  It was made by a guy in 2002, running for the Senate.  It was made at a time when the sentiment for war ran high.  And he still made the speech because he spoke about what mattered to him, no matter what the political cost. That's judgment and integrity.  You two just don't have it and it is why Hillary lost my support back in 2002.
Obama '08
Sorry Bill, that explanation of Hillary's vote for the war, just doesn't hold water.  Firstly, most Americans at the time knew that GWB was going to use that resolution to go to war.  The 21 Democrats who voted against the resolution (and 1 independent - Jeffers and one Republican - Chaffee also knew that this resolution would be used to go to war, no matter what). Secondly, the NIE, which Hillary admits to not reading, cast serious doubt on the idea that there were any weapons of mass destruction.  Finally, it doesn't explain why Hillary voted against the Levin/Reid amendment which would have required Congress to give the final authority to go to war if the U.N. did not support us in this effort.  

Sorry, Bill, this is the age of the internet.  It's all available to the public to read and not only was it shameful that Hillary used these votes to position herself for a run for the presidency, but the fact that you now are re-writing history with your revisionist interpretation, speaks to the deception which is a prelude to the type of administration that we could expect from a Clinton third term.  You not only disrespect us by trying to reshape our memories but you tarnish your own reputation by stating such nonsense.  

Thank G-d this primary is over and that you Clintons will be out of the picture.  This is as much as about you lying as it is about your wife's numerous lies. I mean sniper fire in Bosnia, reported to us by her on at least three separate occassions.  As James Geffin once said, 'It is amazing, the ease with which the Clintons are able to lie.'

Bill, Obama's Hide Park speech on the Iraq war is brilliant and maybe you should read it.  It was made by a guy in 2002, running for the Senate.  It was made at a time when the sentiment for war ran high.  And he still made the speech because he spoke about what mattered to him, no matter what the political cost. That's judgment and integrity.  You two just don't have it and it is why Hillary lost my support back in 2002.
Obama '08
I second Senator Kennedy's statements and sediments.
The surest way for Barack Obama to lose the general election would be to pick Hillary "Republican" Clinton as his running mate.  After her constant back stabbing of the past two months she deserves the honor of being Obama's running mate.

Go Obama 08/12!
Looks like the Dem's are still biting at the bit...when they should decreasing the fuel the GOP can put sand into their gears....What happens when sand is put into the gears?...dust blows in your face and eyes...McCain's powder puff football...

Tell the Dem's to line up NOW!!! or McClinton ticket will steal the ball...
The Clinton scandals are not new. Some are so bad that we've become apathetic to them. They've included impeachments of presidents (2nd ever in history), death of associates, pardons of criminals, and dubious donations.

What is new is how the media has avoided covering any Clinton scandals over the primaries.

Women deserve better representation than this.
I have always felt that Hillary needed Obama on her ticket more than he needs her.  Although he will lose a certain percentage of staunch Clinton supporters, he has more crossover appeal and fewer negatives.  He needs someone with experience and a strong military-Jim Webb is mentioned frequently, and I have always liked Joe Biden, both of whom would have great crossover appeal..
Who cares what Senator Kennedy thinks???  Not I.
He is just another Obama sucka!!!
Kennedy got mad at Hillary cause she wouldnt be beholding to him and let him run her campaign so he endorsed Obama to slap her and dug her good doing it. There that showed her but it is Obama will ans to him now if he gets the white house.Dont think there isnt a long line waiting for this new kind of politican(gagging saying it even)to do there bidding. These young kids think they will have a say. What a surprise they have if he gets it.He has got caught laughing at" these whites" before.Darn those mikes that are still on.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1009379

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google