ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Take me home...

Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:13 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Take me home, country roads: Perhaps the best way to think of today’s West Virginia primary is like the final football game of the regular season, which really won’t impact the teams headed to the playoffs. Yes, the players will once again don their helmets and shoulder pads. Yes, the game will count, as will the statistics. But MUCH, MUCH more has to happen besides this sole game to change the postseason situation. That said, is it a problem if Obama can't come within 20 points of Clinton here? If we set the line at Clinton by 24 points (62%-38%) -- about the same percentage Obama won Mississippi -- would you take Clinton and give the points? Apparently Obama would. If he struggles to get 38%, which is the approximate percentage of the white vote he gets in similar states, shouldn't that be some cause for concern? Sure, West Virginia and Virginia have traded spots in the fall battleground this decade, but with the economy in the pits, a state like West Virginia could be one Dems can carry. Then again, if the economy mattered in the state’s presidential politics, Gore and Kerry should have been able to carry the state, right? There are 28 pledged delegates up for grabs in tonight’s contest, and polls open at 6:30 am ET and close at 7:30 pm ET.

*** Sen. Obama, you’ve just lost West Virginia… what are you going to do next? … ‘I’m going to Florida!’ If you’re Obama, how do you make a potential big loss in West Virginia look like it doesn't bother you? You start campaigning in fall battleground states, which is what Obama is doing. Today, he heads to Missouri; tomorrow, it’s Michigan; and next week, he goes to Florida. While it makes a lot of political sense to focus on your strengths rather than weaknesses (i.e., campaigning in WV and KY), shouldn't he be ramping up his campaign a tad in Kentucky? Doesn't he want to at least come within, say, 10 points in that state to show that he is starting to win over some of these white working-class voters?

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd previews today's West Virginia primary and Mississippi's special congressional election.

*** Where we stand: Obama leads in pledged delegates per the NBC hard count (1,590 to 1,426), overall delegates (1,870 to 1,702.5), the popular vote (16,050,924 to 15,336,896), and the total number of contests won (31 to 16). Note: We’re not including Texas in this contest count, given that Clinton won the primary but Obama won the caucus and netted the most total Texas delegates. Obama also took the lead yesterday in superdelegates for the first time, according to the NBC count. He picked up four supers yesterday and one more this morning: Indiana congressman Joe Donnelly. Obama has now picked up 24 supers since last Tuesday's contests in North Carolina and Indiana.

*** A Miss(issippi) opportunity: While West Virginia’s primary will obviously receive the most attention, the more competitive -- and more interesting -- race today occurs in Mississippi, where Travis Childers (D) and Greg Davis (R) compete in a run-off to replace former Rep. Roger Wicker (R), who was appointed to fill Trent Lott’s Senate seat. Democrats and Republicans agree that the contest is a pure toss-up. A Childers win would represent the Democrats’ third-straight win of a GOP-held seat (the others took place in Illinois and Louisiana); a Davis win would be a nice shot in the arm for a Republican Party that hasn’t seen much go its way in the past two years. But make no mistake that the GOP has the most to lose in this district that Bush won by 62% in 2004. “If the Republicans lose, it will be significant because they won’t be able to blame the candidate” like they did in Illinois and Louisiana, says Nathan Gonzales of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report. Polls close at 8:00 pm ET.

*** What happens when specials get nationalized: The Cook Political Report’s David Wasserman adds that it’s important not to ignore this point about the Mississippi run-off: It’s a nonpartisan election, which means Childers doesn’t have that “D” next to name, and that’s a significant advantage for the Democrat. But that hasn’t stopped Republicans from trying their best to nationalize the contest, in part by tying Childers to Obama. Last month, Davis unveiled a TV ad mentioning Jeremiah Wright and “bitter.” In addition, Cheney stumped for Davis yesterday, and the state’s top Republicans -- like Wicker and Gov. Haley Barbour -- are out in full force for Davis. Per Gonzales, this contest disabuses the idea that Obama is a political asset for Democrats in all parts of the country. “I think this race proves that he’s not going to be a powerful downballot force everywhere.” That said, the match-up appears to be a win-win situation for the Democrats. A Childers victory would be yet another win in an overwhelmingly GOP district and it would come even as Republicans tried to make Obama a boogeyman in the race. A Davis victory, meanwhile, would come after the GOP devoted precious resources and time to a district that Bush won by 62% four years ago. 

*** Five big turning points: Yesterday, we began discussing some under-appreciated turning points in the Clinton-Obama race that put Clinton where she stands now: on the brink of elimination. Yesterday’s point was the role Illinois’ proximity to key primary battlegrounds; today, it’s Chris Dodd and the October 2007 Philly debate. While many remember that debate -- which set off a two-week media firestorm over Clinton’s answer to a question over driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants -- few remember the role Dodd played in it. In the lightning round portion at the end of the debate, Clinton was asked about a her statement that Eliot Spitzer’s plan to allow illegal immigrants to have driver’s licenses made a lot of sense. Following that, Dodd disagreed with the plan, and when Clinton said that she, too, didn’t agree with the plan, Dodd interjected, “No, no, no … you thought it made sense to do it.” That exchange then allowed Edwards jump in: “Unless I missed something, Sen. Clinton said two different things in the course of about two minutes just a few minutes ago.” Then came Obama: “I was confused on Senator Clinton's answer. I can't tell whether she was for it or against it.” And, voila, the aftermath paved the way for Iowa to be competitive two months later. Remember, this wasn't a point in the debate that the media jumped on Clinton; it was her fellow candidates doing it, and that might be why it resonated. 

*** McCain's good anti-Bush day: For a guy whom Democrats see as a potential Bush third term, McCain got some good anti-Bush press with his global-warming speech in Oregon yesterday. The New York Times: "Senator John McCain sought to distance himself from President Bush…” The Washington Post: “Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) made a sharp break with President Bush…” And the LA Times: "Distancing himself from President Bush…” Now, if just every day could be a global-warming day for McCain…

*** The right’s Nader? Former GOP Rep. Bob Barr announced yesterday that he would run for president on the Libertarian ticket. If he gets a percentage or two, could he swing a few states? “Barr, who has hired Ross Perot's former campaign manager, acknowledged that some Republicans have tried to discourage him from running. But he said he's getting in the race to win, not to play spoiler or to make a point.” Still, if he gets a percentage or two, could he swing a few states? Pay special attention to Georgia, by the way. If Barr's on the ballot there, doesn't he get 3-4%, and isn't that enough to push Obama across the finish line if the black vote surges as expected? Where else?

*** Back on the Hill: Per NBC’s Ken Strickland, it looks like Obama and Clinton will be back in the Senate today for a procedural vote on a big union issue: a bill that would give collective bargaining power to state and local first responders. The vote is expected in the morning, but the exact time is unclear at this point. Depending on the timing, the senators/candidates could also vote on a couple of energy proposals: a Democratic measure to suspend filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) and a broad Republican package focused on oil production, but also calls for suspension of the SPR. The Democratic version should pass, but the White House is against it.

*** On the trail: In addition to her activity on Capitol Hill, Clinton holds her primary night party in Charleston, WV; McCain, in Washington State, holds an environmental roundtable in North Bend and then raises money in Bellevue; and Obama campaigns first in Kentucky and then in Missouri. Also, Bill Clinton stumps in Montana.
 
Countdown to Kentucky and Oregon: 7 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 175 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 252 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Senator Clinton needs to explain why she is quoting George Wallace's stump slogan "Send them a Message," before I ever support her for anything.

She, herself, needs to explain this to African American Voters.  She knows better!!!

What do you think First Read of the article on MSNBC regarding the encoutner of Obama staffers with remnants of American bigotry? The article is found at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24588813/.
I wonder why the MSM has rarely reported on incidents like the ones in the article. While I am completely unsurprised by the bigotry demonstrated in the article (I am a white guy, but most of my friends are Asians and blacks), I was surprised that the media has not done a more thorough job of dethroning racism from America. Racism is an institutional problem and is built into the perceptions of the most ignorant or alienated individuals who live their lives with their narrower minds. Determining a person's place in America on account of race (or sex, for that matter) is like rejecting humanity as a whole and existentially.
I am glad Iowa, as the first overwhelmingly white state to favor Obama, has largely prevented bigoted and alienated minds of America in influencing the future f this nation. Goddness, compassion and truth will always prevail, just as they did over twisted, heartless white segregatists of our nation.
hillary is still the best female candidate in the race, if I can't vote for the eletist, lying, corrupt, selfish, pandering, flip flopping, man hating, racist, bigot, war mongering, buiness as usual, corporate owned, cry baby hillary rodham clinton I will vote for john mccain and so will everyone else on the pipe.
Chuck & Co. - that is a great comparison between the WV primary and a football game late in the season.  Spot-on.

As for it's significance, I think that no matter what happens tonight in WV, Obama will still be the Democratic nominee.

What I don't understand is why the media is dancing around the reasoning for such a large discrepancy in the numbers in West Virginia.  Isn't it fairly clear why Hillary is going to win tonight?

http://thepajamapundit.com/
Chuck, don't forget that Obama won Washington state, DC, Nebraska and other states by between $65% and 75%. So there is no point of telling us that Hillary's $72 or more margin of victory matters more or less than the larger states which Obama carried by more than $60 percent.
Why is Sen. Clinton still using racially divisive rhetoric?
Before I just assumed that it was clumsiness, but now ... I don't know !
I mean she is a smart politician ! She knows what she is doing !
"Send them a message !"

I know it may sound innocent, but to the people who have gone through this nonsense before, it is frightening.
Code word for "lets show em' that we will not have a Black lead us in WV"

Shame on her.
2 plus 2 will never equal 15, but the darker side of our civilization is desperate to stop Obama. Cheating is still a creative art. We need to recognize it whenever we see it.
When Hillary wins West Virginia and Kentucky with 60% or better of the vote in each state, it will be a clear indication to the super delegates that Obama cannot a) win big BLUE states with large electoral vote counts, and b) change the shape, size, and color of the electoral map.
Oh, did I say color? Of course you know I mean from Red to Blue.
But, I have no doubt some DIMWIT will assert that I'm "playing the race card."
That seems to be the only thing the Obama camp and the media, which prostitutes itself to him, have to offer these days.
By the way; did I mention that I'm part of that 30% of Hillary's supporters who will cross the aisle in November if Obama gets the nomination?
How about a story on THAT little statistic? You won't do that, will you?
You HARLETS!
I'm not bothered by a 38% or so showing for Obama since Clinton has been contesting it and this is "her" demographic.  It would be different if she was not in the race and he had been actively campaigning in it.  No President wins by getting each and every vote.  We have a healthy amount of diversity in this country and that's a good thing.  It's what keeps us honest and hopefully moving forward (as long as we keep trying to be constructive about it all).

Obama for our best future.
I expect Obama to be met with boo's (at the very least) in Florida as he will be seen as part of the machine that is trying to stifle the vote. Watch his words become even more flowery.

 John McCain is going to love watching this.
C'Mon all you "typical white, small town, bible clinging, gun totting, antipathy toward others who are not like you" American Voters !!

Vote for the person who enjoys degrading you and gets away with it --with a smile!  Vote for Sen. Obama! REAL change you all can believe in!!
Shame is of no value...
Regret is the start of nothing.
The needs far out exceeds the goal....
Reason calls no honor...
Experience says it all...
Hmmm. Has anyone asked the Libertatians if they want Barr as their candidate? Given the Republicans consistent policies of eroding Civil Liberties, anyone who has been a party to that, shouldn't be allowed within 1776 miles of their Party, not to mention the Iraq invsion, No Bid Mercenary Armies, Secret Executive Branch DeLuxe, yahda yahda yahda. My guess is the true Libertarians don't need Reagan Youth hijacking their Party. Just an Independent Observation.
On Feb 5th, the Republicans had the first part of their primary election.  On the day that McCain essentially wrapped up the nomination, here was the results from West Virginia:

Huckabee:  52%
Romney:  47%
McCain:  1%  !!!!!!!!

So by the Clinton "primaries are good indications of the general" metric, if Barack gets 2% today, he'll beat McCain in West Virginia in the general.

So that's the new goal for Obama, set by the Clintons themselves:  2% in West Virginia

...This is why the Clinton logic is illogical.
Obama will go down in history as the test of America's moral compass. Will immoral tribalism trump self interest? In the face of the last 8 years, if the majority would turn their backs on hope, then the racial divide is much worse that the media will admit.

The world is watching, hoping the United States are truly united. But in truth, what happens to the brand name if the rest of the world no longer believes in the American dream?
I say about Kentucky just as I said about WV...I think he should be campaigning there as an investment for the General.

I support a fifty-state strategy.  Not only will Obama have the financial and people resources to do this (much more than McCain) but as the newer guy on the block (much more of an advantage this year) he has to give people time to get to know him...to shake his hand, to connect with them.

I suspect you will see Obama getting out to all these states in the next few months although I think it would be great if he spent more time in Kentucky.  I am also, however, excited to see him pivot to the General.

McCain's free ride is going to get very expensive!
**Attention Hillary Supporters**

I've finally realized... It's time for Change We Can Believe In!

Please join me in turning the page on the old, failed style of politics. Let's join the millions of voters, donors, and supporters who have seen what we have failed to see from the very beginning. Help me embrace the next President of the United States...

Barack Obama!

YES WE CAN!!!
A few hillbillies in West Virginia will not save Hilly and Billy from inevitable defeat in the primary.  Sad that "Desperate" Hillary is trying to fool her supporters into sending her more money to waste and that somehow WVA matters, it doesn't.

Go Obama 08/12!
Racism is here to stay. "Take him and hang him"..."Whites take care of Whites and Blacks take care of Blacks. I'm sadden.  Is this why things have not changed much for Blacks.  Also the encouragement through the words of the Clintons, one whom had held the highest office and the other trying again to be back there. They know the words to bring out the hatred to win certain states.  Breaks my heart.  However, recently, I have been made not to be surprised of the Clintons due to the fact former Pres Clinton went back to AR to ensure a black man with the iQ of 3-yr was executed.

Iowa was misleading.
Also, Bill Clinton stumps in Montana

Love it. Assume they couldnt' book him a flight to Mars today.  Buzzy Bill Lightyear--to infinity and beyond.
Good riddance to the racist Trent Lott.  If anyone is interested, google "Trent Lott mansion" to read about how the taxpayer, thanks to Dubbya, rebuilt Lott's Mississippi beachfront property after the hurricane.   Somebody ask Trent (and Dubbya) why there are still people living in FEMA trailers in Mississippi and Louisiana while he is living in luxury.
Well, it will be nice to have third party candidates on both sides this time...perhaps we won't have a true spoiler.

I am enjoying following your big turning points, I hadn't watched that debate so it was nice to hear your view on it.
 It is obvious to all that Mrs. Clintons juggernaut is about to overtake Obama in a furry akin the Great Salt War of 1653, it was inevitable was it not.

   Soon all that have opposed the majestic Mrs. Clinton will bow before her greatness, her destiny.

   The trash heap will be littered with the remains of the Hillary nah sayers and their kind and the name of Obama shall never be uttered from that day forward, as it was surely meant to be. So Mode It Be



   Van
Why is the media so full of suckers and liars?  First Read, itself, was talking about how primary battles don't extend to general election battles.  All of a sudden that disappears in the context of today?  What are the general election poll matchups for West Virginia looking like?  I mean, Clinton got clobbered and globbered in Hawaii, but are we really supposed to believe that means it would go to McCain?  How about you do something useful like report some general election matchup polling?  Or is the media going to continue to be lazy?
West Virginia....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.{...snore....}

Isn't it interesting that in past elections, WVA didn't register a blip on the radar and now the election is a "turning point" (I feel like a ballerina with all the turning points we have been doing...getting dizzy..) and our next president hinges on folks who appear to be uneducated and ready to believe every lie just 'cause someone said they saw it on the internet? (Obama's a Muslim, doesn't say the pledge, etc.)

Sheesh...

Sen. Obama is coming to Grand Rapids, MI on Wednesday and I would love to go.  I think they are expecting something like 10,000 people at Van Andel arena.  WOW!  Has Clinton pulled in anywhere close to those numbers?

Also - Terry McAuffe needs to dial it down a notch.  Saw in this morning on "Morning Mika" and on "Meet the Press".  2229 is NOT the number.  Electoral votes DO NOT COUNT FOR PRIMARIES.  For the record, I loved that Tim nailed him on his own conversation with Carl Levin about delegates in MI when MI threatned to do what they did this year.  He couldn't talk his way out of it!  Fantastic!  But, as Wanda Sikes said - "You gotta stick with your lie." (Comedy Central Presents)

Happy Tuesday!
Here is a scenario – NFL decides for whatever absurd reason that field goals won’t count in the playoffs. All the contending teams agree to the rules. Now two teams playing in the AFC championship game, lets say Team A prepares around TDs only. Even when they could kick a field goal they still went for a TD. The other team on the other hand, kicks plenty of field goals and falls behind.

Now it’s the last quarter with two minutes left in the game. Team A is ahead 21-0 as a result of three touch downs. Team B kicked seven field goals which don’t count, now team B wants their seven field goals counted and argues that it has a better chance of beating the NFC champ in the Super Bowl.

If we won’t change the rules in a simple game of football, how can the HRC and Obama campaigns expect the rules to be changed in the presidential elections? Right or wrong is not important, rules are important. In fact they are sacred, especially when everyone agreed to them. If you don’t like the rules then get them changed, but this one has to play out.  So here is the bottom line,

1. Big states are the same as small states
2. Popular votes don’t matter
3. MI and FL don’t matter
4. Super delegates can overturn the will of the pledged delegate, only if they feel that the candidate being nominated is rogue and has no chance in hell to get elected. Just because one is slightly more electable is NOT an argument. So even though Obama is slightly more electable than HRC, he still can’t claim that to be an argument to the super delegates.
5. Winning more states is not an argument, so Obama don’t even go there
6. Raising millions more than HRC also shouldn’t matter because the rules say nothing about that.
7. Having a much smaller disapproval rating (27%) to HRC’s (47%) also should not matter. We must play by the rules
8. So what if HRC messed up her campaign even though she was the front runner and a shoo in for the nomination and Obama was a nobody. He targeted the areas and states that he thought were important and would propel him to victory. This makes him a better planner, with better judgment and an overall smarter person but since rules say nothing of it, all his efforts shouldn’t count towards the nomination.
9. So what if Obama has more character and integrity
10. Only the number of delegates matter

Not supporting Obama is not a racial issue. The fact is that the man has done nothing to earn him the right to be the President of the United States. He gives a good speach but he's an empty turd. His plans for Billions is social welfare will cripple our economy much, much, further than it is now. His biggest fault may be his own bigotry. He is a hater.
I'd rather see the 2/3 closet democrat John McCain in the whitehouse. He has served his country in more ways than Barak Hussien Obama ever will.
Speaking of which. We are in a religious war with muslim radicals, and you want me to vote for a guy named BARAK HUSSIEN OBAMA !!!!!!!!
Shut up...
Thank you Jerry S. Oakland, CA for your eloquent words.
Gosh...he should start taking advice from you guys, since he has only won in every metric.

BTW I noticed Clinton was never asked to explain why she lost predominately "white' states like IA, WY, Idaho, ND...should I go on...or is your arguement that everyone in those state is wealthy?  Also Hillary did not compete in every state, but oh that's right she had , like now, no money.
He picked up four supers yesterday and one more this morning: Indiana congressman Joe Donnelly.

Thanks for burying this. And if you're reading this Chuck, thanks for letting Matthews waste most of last night's show on wild speculation. The real stories yesterday were the superdelegate jump and Obama's powerful speech in WV.

Hardball, which used to be one of my favorite shows, of late has degenerated into caricature. As a hard numbers guy, Chuck, it'd be nice to see you put the brakes on the crap and refocus on the known and the knowable.
Just came back from a trip to the Tampa area in Florida...and guess what Obamabots!  Not a single person I met will vote for Obama if he's the nominee...they all said they would vote for Hillary since she's fighting to seat that state's delegates, and think Obama is making a huge a mistake by opposing seating Florida at the convention...they all said they will vote McCain if Obama is the nominee because Obama basically is dissing Florida just to get the nomination, knowing that he would lose Florida in any real competitive race there.  
Hillary should not be proud of her presumed victory in West Virginia.  She knows the sad truth of the hollowness that defines this statement of the voters here and in Kentucky.  What's sad is that she and her staff not only ignore the implications but encourage the negativism.  I know that the process of bringing this country across the racial divide will not be easy but I expect more from the Clintons...and then again, why should I?

Good people of West Virginia...search your hearts and you will find that this is the time for a cleansing of the spirit.  This cleansing may be like climbing mountains for some but it is a mountain that should be scaled in order to follow the path of G-d.
Obama '08
Mrs. Clinton and you can include Bill have run a mis-managed divisive campaign.  She complains that the press hasn't treated her fairly as well.  What a crock.  Though, she would probably be better than Keating 5 McCain, it would be minimal and that's if she could get elected and I think not.  Vote Obama if you really want any changes from the past.
The ass-clowns who run this website, and who have psuedo-campaigned for Obama under the pretense of "journalistic reporting," would make Joseph Goebbles proud.
Yes that's right, I am comparing the CRAP you write about Obama to Nazi propaganda. That's about all it equates to.
Now the question will be who is more irrelevant a candidate, Bob Barr or Ralph Nader.  I hope Ralph is more insignificant as that will mean Barr draws off more votes from Flip Flop McCain.

Go Obama 08/12!
Explain this to me again Obamapods....polls show that if the election were held today, Hillary beats McCain by double digits, while Obama barely beats him by 6 percentage points...so how is it your candidate is the most electable and better to beat McCain?  I'll save you the time and effor - he can't, he's totally unelectable, and if he's the nominee, the Democratic party needs to be ripped to shreds, and start all over again.
If I never hear the phrase "from day one" again, it will be too soon...

As they said on MSNBC this morning (I think it was Chris Matthews) - you can't judge this race on historical references - it's always been one Anglo-Saxon guy against another.  This year we have a WOMAN and a AA MAN running!  You can't go by what has been before - IT'S NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE!
The Country Roads song by John Denver isn't about WV.  The Blue Ridge Mountains and Shenandoah River is in WESTERN VA
Keep it up Obama supporters.

Keep running your mouths.

You're going to be sorry.
If I remember correctly, Senator Clinton's campaign said (early on) that she would win West Virginia by 43 points.  I, for one, am holding her to that commitment.  If she wins by less than 43 points, it should be considered a loss for her.

I agree with Jerry of Oakland concerning the issue of racism in this campaign.  I hold the main stream media responsible for their contribution to that racism.  We were faced with the issue of Rev. Wright constantly during the course of several months, whereas the issues of racism faced directly by Senator Obama and his supporters were never addressed.  Racism?  One would certainly have to give pause to that thought!

I continue to feel that the statements by Senator Clinton concerning the voters of West Virginia and Kentucky to be an insult to those citizens.  The natives of those two states already have a hillbilly, redneck reputation among other Americans.  What Senator Clinton has done increases that sterotype to the point of being disgusting.  

I know the ramifications of this prejudice from first hand experience.  As a Kentuckian who moved north of the Ohio River, I have even been asked, among other things, if we had indoor plumbing!  The mind set of many Americans against the citizens of these two states in anything but pleasing to those of us who lived there.  I resent Senator Clinton's contribution to the continuation of that reputation.

Now that Senator Obama has become the decive leader in the Democratic primary, we are finally seeing a better representation of the things he has faced during this campaign.  There are still inequalities.  For example, the SNL skit poking fun of Senator Obama was played many times by the MSM.  I have only seen the latest SNL skit (about Senator Clinton's attitudes) replayed one time by the media.  Equal - - -??  I think not.

Despite all the forces that have fought Senator Obama at every turn, he has retained grace and dignity throughout.  That has been so admirable and is certainly a positive for him.  If he can face personal attacks from every avenue, wouldn't he do the same when confronted by the storms from other countries.  I would have to say that he would.  

Also of great note is the way he has dealt with the campaign finances.  Again, he has shown great responsibility.  In Senator Clinton's rants, she made special note that Senator Obama outspent her 2:1.  Yes, that's true - - but he outearned her by at least 2:1.  In addition, he has not left a series of unpaid bills behind him.  As the leader of this country, I feel that he will respect my few tax dollars in the same way that he has respected the campaign dollars.

Taken, issue by issue, Senator Obama has come out as a winner in every respect.  He has shown himself, time and again, to be the type of person we need to lead this country into a brighter future.

We know that the old attitudes do not work any longer.  We have been told that most of the world resents us.  To continue with the old policies would meet the definition of insanity, wouldn't it.  Change?  Yes, but change for the better.  To me that means President Obama!

For the life long Democrats who say they will never vote for Senator Obama in this race or in any other.  Perhaps you can make yourself feel better if you just tell yourself that you'll vote for the white half of him.  We all know that what is preventing your support of your political party is the black half.  That an old story, dear ones, and not a very pretty one.

Thank you


Anyone who supports a third Bush term does not support our brave overworked troops!  Anyone who votes for "Warmonger" McCain is supporting enslaving our troops with the stop-loss policy where our brave troopers have been abused with so many multiple combat tours.  He doesn't even support better education benefits for veterans because he wants to keep abusing them with more and more combat tours.

Time to send all his supporters over to Iraq, pay them crappy wages and ensure their families are split apart for long periods of time over and over again.

Go Obama 08/12!
Senator Clinton's use of the George Wallace phrase "send them a message" tells us why she should not be President.  She does not hesitate to bring out the worst in voters.  

There is no reason to vote for her simply because she is a woman, I am appalled at the very thought.

She has run an inept campaign, mismanaged her funds, and ANY argument that she would do better running the budget of the US is so silly, one wonders how any reasonable person can buy into it.

I am a 55 year old woman who will vote based on the qualities of the contenders, not the gender.  
It was also announced this morning that New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin is endorsing Obama. Here is an excerpt from his statement:

Why is it that first read thinks, that any good team or coach would put in the first team when the game means nothing,you boys must have never played ball before.You try to make a case that  there is still hope and that the sky will fall and Obama will not be able to carry on.Please stop this Hope-a-dope gig you seem to be on.Even this morning Chris Mattews on morning Mika said that the game is over, why try to sugar coat it.
What I find strange is that it seems to occur to nobody that Mr. Obama does not campaign in WV and KY because in that way he does not antagonize the Clinton voters against him. He will have his shot at the voters in the general election and because he did not plarize the voters in the primary has a fair shot at getting their support. A very good strategy I think.
The Right Deserves a Nader.
Riddle me this Clinton supporters.  When Hillary finally admits defeat and throws her support to Barack Obama and the Democratic Party are you going to really vote for our true enemy Flip Flop McCain?

After all this support you've shown her over all this time will you really dishonor her by voting for the repugnant one who will give us just more of the failed policies the Bush/Cheney Tyranny has wrought upon our good country?  Will you blow off her suggestions for party unity so "Warmonger" McCain can keep our brave soldiers enslaved by the stop loss program that ensures they have to endure more combat tours?  Is this the gratitude you'll show Hillary when she finally comes to grips with political reality?

If so then Hillary has three words for you: Shame On You!"!

Go Obama 08/12!
Senator Clinton needs to explain why she is quoting George Wallace's stump slogan "Send them a Message," before I ever support her for anything.

She, herself, needs to explain this to African American Voters.  She knows better!!!


Katy in Michigan (Sent Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:27 AM)


No you're wrong.

Barack Obama needs to explain to white voters why he has NEVER told Black people in this country not to vote for him just because he's black.

I'm so sick and tired of listening to people in this country attempt to justify why 90+% of ALL Blacks have voted for Obama and no candiate has ever gotten 90+% of any group of people in every caucus and primary while running for President.

Give me a f*****g break.

Put a Black guy up for President and all of a sudden ALL the Black people in the country are interested in politics.  Where were All these same Black people in 2000 and 2004 when they should have come out in the same type of numbers and kept George Bush from becoming President.

It's not about politics or who's best qualified to be President.  It's about Blacks voiting for a Black candidate, and that's the fact whether anyone wants to hear it or not.

Stop tip-toeing around the issue and call it like it is.
As a Disabled VietNam Era War veteran I know firsthand just how poorly vets get treated by Republicans like "Warmonger" McCain.  I served in the early 70's under that crooked commander in chief Nixxon and I smell the same putrid stench emanating from the White House that I did back then.

Just two weeks ago I heard a sad news story that a brave young soldier was killed in Afghanistan, during his 7th tour of combat.  No real American patriot would ever force our soldiers to endure so many attempts to cheat death.

Anyone who supports "Warmonger" McCain and this repugnant war for oil in Iraq does not support our brave soldiers.  McCain only supports enslaving our brave soldiers with the stop loss program and his new plan to keep soldiers from being able to escape their enforced slavery in the military to become free civilians furthering their education.

Go Obama 08/12!
A Maryland Super Del switched to Obama today (Jackson) according to the WRC, the Washington DC NBC station.  He had previously committed to Clinton, and is encouraging the Governor and other MD dems to switch in the name of party unity. Please update your counts accordingly


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1014595

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google