ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: McCain's lobbyist purge

Posted: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:29 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** McCain’s lobbyist purge: Remember in February, following Romney's departure from the race, the assumption was that McCain was going to have plenty of time to get his house in order while the Democrats kept fighting, perhaps up until the convention. Well, we're potentially days away from the Dems officially having a presumptive nominee, and McCain's still dealing with staff issues. The latest is the resignation of national finance co-chair Tom Loeffler, the fifth person who has left the campaign due to lobbyist ties. Loeffler was a key guy. How key? Just check out the McCain campaign’s reaction yesterday after Obama knocked McCain for his ties to lobbyists -- like Loeffler: “Just a few years ago when Barack Obama was beginning his career in politics, he was launching it at the home of William Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist… If Barack Obama is going to make associations the issue, we look forward to the debate about Senator Obama's associations and what they say about his judgment and readiness to be commander in chief.” Whoa. One thing to keep an eye on this issue of severing ties with lobbyists is that McCain may get criticism from his own supporters for creating a policy that was doomed to cause him problems. Expect to see a lot more blind quotes reminding McCain that nobility on an issue doesn't deliver an electoral majority.

*** The battle to stereotype: Last week's debate between Obama and McCain over foreign policy presents dangers for both candidates. For Obama, he risks being painted as naïve, inexperienced, and weak. For McCain, he risks being painted as too Bush-like. Both campaigns believe they are going to win this debate. By the way, if the Democratic Party is going to start uniting around Obama as it began to do late last week during the spat with McCain and Bush, the Obama camp might want to make sure that everyone’s working off the same talking points. Here’s Joe Biden -- a potential Obama veep pick -- talking yesterday on ABC about Obama’s position on meeting with unsavory world leaders: “This is a fellow who I think shorthanded an answer that in fact was the wrong answer, in my view, saying I would within my first year, it implied he'd personally sit down with anybody who wanted to sit down with him. That's not what he meant. That's not what he has said since then for the last year or thereabout. And so I think he's fully capable of understanding of what's going." The “wrong answer”? RNC jumped all over that Biden comment. There are a lot of folks in the Dem Party (including the Clinton campaign) who believe Obama made policy based on a debate gaffe, because Obama's campaign at the time didn't want to concede they made a mistake on such a crucial question.

VIDEO: NBC Political Director Chuck Todd gives his first read on Obama's possible declaration of victory and the latest shake-up in the McCain campaign.

*** Bush backing away a bit? Speaking of last week’s foreign policy dust-up… NBC’s Richard Engel, in an interview with Bush that aired on TODAY, asked the president if he was referring to Obama when talking about appeasers in Israel. “You know, my policies haven't changed, but evidently the political calendar has,” Bush said. “My position, Richard, all along has been that if the Iranians verifiably suspend their enrichment -- which will be a key measure to stop them from gaining the know-how to build a weapon -- then they can come to the table, and the United States will be at the table.” Of course, the Bush White House was all about trumpeting the hit on Obama pre-speech. It was only after when the political fallout seemed to hurt Bush more than hurt Obama that the White House backed off.

*** Coming full circle: While it won’t exactly be an event declaring victory, Obama on Tuesday will mark obtaining a majority of pledged delegates in the state that started it all for him: Iowa. “We thought it was a terrific way to bring things full circle,” Obama said. It’s also a battleground state that Bush won in 2004. In fact, it’s worth noting that Iowa launched Obama, and New Hampshire vaulted McCain, and both states will once again be in play in the fall. But is Obama’s event on Tuesday an effort to begin putting away the Hawkeye State? Remember that McCain didn’t make an effort there in 2000, and barely did so eight years later. The Arizona senator is running ads in the state, but how long will he try to keep it in play? If Iowa is still competitive in October (i.e., low single digits), that might be a problem for Obama.

*** This week's First Read series? How about things you missed in politics because they had nothing to do with the presidential primaries... Start with Vito Fossella and lump him in with Larry Craig and Ted Stevens. The three, if the full barrage of the national political press corps had focused on their issues, all three would likely have made different decisions. Craig and Fossella probably would have resigned; Stevens probably would have retired, saving, potentially three seats that shouldn’t be in play -- two in the Senate and one in the House. But all three are in play now. Now, scandal alone isn't the reason why the GOP is on the brink of another disastrous downballot election cycle, but the decisions by these three lawmakers haven't helped things. That Idaho Senate seat should have an appointed incumbent Risch running for a full term; the GOP should be dealing with a fascinating primary to replace Stevens in Alaska; and if Susan Molinari's offspring were old enough to run for Congress, then Fossella might have already been forced out. Seriously, Alaska, Idaho, and Staten Island shouldn't be where the GOP is playing this fall.

*** Calendar watch: McCain's health records are supposed to come out this week.

*** Lots of super movement: Over the weekend, Obama picked up six superdelegates to Clinton’s three. Obama: Maryland's Greg Pecoraro; Kansas add-on Lt. Governor Mark Parkinson, Colorado add-on Federico Pena, Washington State Dem Party chairman Dwight Pelz, and two California add-ons -- land developer William Quay Hays and California fire fighters president Lou Paulson. Clinton got three California add-ons: head of the California Teachers Association Carolyn Doggett, former state assemblyman Dario Frommer, and wife of the Kern County Supervisor Dora Rubio. Also, NBC NEWS adjusted the pledged delegate count in Nevada -- one more for Obama and one less for Clinton for a 14-11 split there. NBC still has 18 delegates for Edwards. Here are the counts: PLEDGED: Obama 1,602 to 1,444; SUPERDELEGATES: Obama 298.5 to 279.5; TOTAL: Obama 1,900.5 to 1,723.5.

*** On the trail: Clinton is in Kentucky, where she has rallies in Maysville, Prestonsburg, Lexington, and Louisville (the final appearance will also include Bill and Chelsea Clinton); McCain speaks to the National Restaurant Association and then raises money there and in Savannah, GA; and Obama is in Montana, campaigning in Billings, on the Crow Reservation, and in Bozeman. Also, both Michelle Obama and Bill Clinton are in Kentucky.
 
Countdown to Kentucky and Oregon: 1 day
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 169 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 246 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails. 
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

In the fall, the weather will turn cooler and probably rainy in most of the country.  So I hope Presidential nominee Obama can squeeze in some big rally’s like yesterday in Portland.  He can spend a fortune in advertising, he can rack up endorsements, he can win debates with McCain, but nothing will hit home harder than a few more of these mega rallies.

Just don’t compete against the NFL on Sundays this fall.  Bad karma.
'...her media reputation as "nasty" and "ruthless...'

Hillary Clinton, vicious but fair.....

'...But by running a racially tinged campaign, lying
about her foreign policy experience and repeatedly
seeming to favor McCain over her Democratic opponent,
Clinton didn't just break through the "glass floor,"
she set a new low for floors in general,...'

racially tinged.... ?
Does that mean 'race-baiting' ?

'...We didn't really need her racial innuendos and
free-floating bellicosity...'

WORD !

'...her media reputation as "nasty" and "ruthless...'
Take me to your leader ...


'...the woman to get closest to the Oval Office has
promised to "obliterate" the toddlers of Tehran...'

THAT'S A NEW LOW !
"obliterate" ?

Genocide a-go-go ?



From theNation.com:

'...Hillary's Gift to Women By Barbara Ehrenreich

May 12, 2008

In Friday's New York Times, Susan Faludi rejoiced over
Hillary Clinton's destruction of the myth of female
prissiness and innate moral superiority, hailing
Clinton's "no-holds-barred pugnacity" and her media
reputation as "nasty" and "ruthless." Future female
presidential candidates will owe a lot to the race of
2008, Faludi wrote, "when Hillary Clinton broke
through the glass floor and got down with the boys."

I share Faludi's glee--up to a point. Surely no one
will ever dare argue that women lack the temperament
for political combat. But by running a racially tinged
campaign, lying about her foreign policy experience
and repeatedly seeming to favor McCain over her
Democratic opponent, Clinton didn't just break through
the "glass floor," she set a new low for floors in
general, and would, if she could have gotten within
arm's reach, have rubbed the broken glass into Obama's
face.

A mere decade ago Francis Fukuyama fretted in Foreign
Affairs that the world was too dangerous for the West
to be entrusted to graying female leaders, whose
aversion to violence was, as he established with
numerous examples from chimpanzee society, "rooted in
biology." The counter-example of Margaret Thatcher,
perhaps the first of head of state to start a war for
the sole purpose of pumping up her approval ratings,
led him to concede that "biology is not destiny." But
it was still a good reason to vote for a
prehistoric-style club-wielding male.

Not to worry though, Francis. Far from being the
stereotypical feminist-pacifist of your imagination,
the woman to get closest to the Oval Office has
promised to "obliterate" the toddlers of
Tehran--along, of course, with the bomb-builders and
Hezbollah supporters. Earlier on, Clinton foreswore
even talking to presumptive bad guys, although women
are supposed to be the talk addicts of the species.
Watch out--was her distinctly unladylike message to
Hugo Chávez, Kim Jong-Il and the rest of them--or I'll
rip you a new one.

There's a reason it's been so easy for men to overlook
women's capacity for aggression. As every student of
Women's Studies 101 knows, what's called aggression in
men is usually trivialized as "bitchiness" in women:
men get angry; women suffer from bouts of
inexplicable, hormonally-driven, hostility. So give
Clinton credit for defying the belittling stereotype:
she's been visibly angry for months, if not decades,
and it can't all have been PMS.

But did we really need another lesson in the female
capacity for ruthless aggression? Any illusions I had
about the innate moral superiority of women ended four
years ago with Abu Ghraib. Recall that three out of
the five prison guards prosecuted for the torture and
sexual humiliation of prisoners were women. The prison
was directed by a woman, Gen. Janis Karpinski, and the
top US intelligence officer in Iraq, who also was
responsible for reviewing the status of detainees
before their release, was Major Gen. Barbara Fast. Not
to mention that the US official ultimately responsible
for managing the occupation of Iraq at the time was
Condoleezza Rice. Whatever violent and evil things men
can do, women can do too, and if the capacity for
cruelty is a criterion for leadership, as Fukuyama
suggested, then Lynndie England should consider
following up her stint in the brig with a run for the
Senate.

It's important--even kind of exhilarating--for women
to embrace their inner bitch, but the point should be
to expand our sense of human possibility, not to
enshrine aggression as a virtue. Women can behave like
the warrior queen Boadicea, credited with slaughtering
70,000, many of them civilians, or like Margaret
Thatcher, who attempted to dismantle the British
welfare state. Men, for their part, are free to take
as their role models the pacifist leaders Martin
Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi. Biology conditions us
in all kinds of ways we might not even be aware of
yet. But virtue is always a choice.

Hillary Clinton smashed the myth of innate female
moral superiority in the worst possible way--by
demonstrating female moral inferiority. We didn't
really need her racial innuendos and free-floating
bellicosity to establish that women aren't wimps. As a
generation of young feminists realizes, the values
once thought to be uniquely and genetically
female--such as compassion and an aversion to
violence--can be found in either sex, and sometimes
it's a man who best upholds them.

"Senator Obama's associations and what they say about his judgment and readiness to be commander in chief.”  So much for the McCain campaign's professed desire to not engage in negative campaigning.
Okay Chuck -- You have a day and a half to decide. When the polls close in Kentucky tomorrow will you or will you not declare Obama the PROJECTED WINNER of the DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION based upon his capture of the most pledged delegates? Or will it be another MSNBC wimp out?
John McSame is corrupt - having swung a huge military deal from Boeing to Airbus is an act of treason - probably hard for Republicans to accept the TRUTH but this represents $40B dollars leaving our country and another reason why McSame's economic policies will be the continued ruination of the US economy.

Obama '08..!!!!!
McCain is taking so long with his medical records, because he is still finding a truck big enough to transport them, and he has a team of 100 redacting anything relating to his urinary incontinence problem.
Biden is looking better and better as VP

He's a politician who can shoot back at Republican smears
You need a fighter, not a liar

He's every bit as experienced at foreign policy as McCain, except Biden has LEARNED SOMETHING from HIS experience

And Biden never claimed to have dodged sniper fire or save refugees in Macedonia

Obama-Biden '

Sounds good to me !!
George Bush is a coward.
What about the totals for campaign contributions for April?  I thought those were to be released by May 15th.
If this race goes beyond tomorrow...the SD's need to step in and end it....

The Dem's will cause this circus to end....
INTERESTING POINT

IF THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES WERE DESIGNED THE SAME AS THE GENERAL ELECTION (ELECTORAL VOTES BY STATE, WINNER TAKES ALL – WHICH MAKES THE MOST SENSE, SINCE THAT’S HOW THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IS DONE) CLINTON WOULD HAVE 295 VOTES (ONLY 270 NEEDED TO WIN) AND OBAMA WOULD ONLY HAVE 206.  SHE’LL HAVE WELL OVER 300 SOON, A LANDSLIDE IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.  ALSO, MOST OF THE STATES OBAMA WON VOTED REPUBLICAN IN THE LAST ELECTION AND PROBABLY WILL AGAIN.  THE SILLY CAUCUS SYSTEM REALLY SKEWS THE RESULTS AND ALLOWS ACTIVISTS TO UNDULY INFLUENCE THE NOMINATION, BUT THESE ACTIVISTS STILL ONLY GET 1 VOTE EACH IN NOVEMBER. OBAMA IS EASILY THE WEAKER CANDIDATE, AND IF HE LOSES IN NOVEMBER, THE SUPERDELEGATES WILL BE SKEWERED FOR NOT DOING THEIR JOB OF PICKING THE MOST QUALIFIED CANDIDATE.  IS IT TIME TO REVAMP THE SYSTEM???
A McCain flak sez: "Just a few years ago when Barack Obama was beginning his career in politics, he was launching it at the home of William Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist… If Barack Obama is going to make associations the issue, we look forward to the debate about Senator Obama's associations and what they say about his judgment and readiness to be commander in chief."
---------------------------------------

Ayers isn't on Obama's campaign staff like these clowns on McCains staff who made blood money off of dictators like the ones in Burma. And Obama never said that he was a "good friend" of Ayers, as McCain gushed about convicted felon and Hitler admirer G. Gordon Liddy. Just a teensy bit of difference there.

Most of the media hasn't gotten around to mentioning McCain's felon problem yet. Maybe it's because McCain gets soft treatment from the press, which he does. But maybe it's also because McCain has so many other scandals going that even the minority of journalists who report objectively on McCain can't keep up with them all.
Good news today for Senator Obama who is ever so close to wrapping this historical primary season up.

Good news so far for Senator Ted Kennedy. Hopefully he'll be out of the hospital soon after what was a very frightful Saturday morning around here.

My opinion of Mike Huckabee has changed drastically. And not for the good. Some things just aren't funny.
I actually think Obama can score some great points over Bush/McCain in foreign policy over the next few months.  It is amazing to me, but McCain just does not sound that knowledgable of, not decisive about his foreign policy decisions and issues.  Color me a little surprised.  And clearly, McCain has a problem on FP when he's forced to run along-side Bush.

I think Bush/McCain has severely underestimated where the American electorate's mindset is on foreign policy and clearly, to the extent that they try to make the debate mostly about foreign policy, they risk ceding all the economic (and domestic issue) talking points to the Dems.

Bring it on Bush, bring it on McCain...Obama, your moment is now.
McCain seems to not know what everyone else knows, his campaign is completely run and funded by lobbyist.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/us/politics/21bundlers.html?em&ex=1208923200&en=24780b6c2f928fad&ei=5087%0A

McCain just getting his house in order now...??  I love it.  This sounds like another round of Obama campaign (strong, consistent, cohesive) versus one that's not.  Deja vu anyone?

Obama for our best future.
some other news sources have different delegate totals (i.e. obama 1909 and 117 away from the magic number on one on-line news source) - why are the counts different depending on who is reporting?
If Obama's team have beaten the "Clinton Machine" in the primaries, the Straight Talk, Double Talk Express should be a breeze. McFossil's team is no match for Obama's. I can't wait for a debate. McFossil will look old and tired....oh wait, he really IS old and tired!
" Of course, the Bush White House was all about trumpeting the hit on Obama pre-speech."

Really? Where was that? I know once something enters the liberal media filter and finally comes out the other end it's typical liberal talking to liberal echo crap. What I though was funny was Edwards on the today show this morning claiming from his perspective it was an obvious reference to Obama.  That says more about Edward's opinion of Obama than anything else. I love this whole stupid argument the democrats and their toadies in the media are making. Bush is a failure because there isn't peace in the middle east, North Korea hasn't been solved, Iran is a threat blah blah blah. Great then Clinton was a failure too, and President OCarter has already told us he plans on being a failure. It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

The cure? New York should stop broadcasting into America :-)
Birds of a feather...the rightwingnuts had a hissy fit over the reverend wright being involved in the periphery of obamas campaign...but..

they are strangely silent on the constant parade of discredited flag waving chickenhawks being dismissed from mcsames campaign...proving once again that

the republican faithful would rather have a flag waving, cheating pseudo christian blowing smoke up their you know whats than a harmless pastor spewing hatred...gotcha
Let's weight the large cities containing big African-American populations w/ MORE DELEGATES than the rest of the state b/c of WHITE GUILT
mccain will still be working on his campaign up to the fall because he is run by lobbyists
Alright, here's the beef to beef about from First Read for us early birds.  Going to be a busy day for the good folks at First Read posting articles and comments.

Looks like "Lobbyist Lover" McCain still has problems with having too many crooked lobbyists who have ties to tyrants around the world.  One would think that months after securing his nomination he'd have gotten rid of all the garbage from his campaign, but then he'd have no campaign staff at all if he did that.

Go Obama 08/12!
I THINK HILARY  SHOULD JUST GIVE UP AND LET OBAMA BECOME PRESIDENT IF HE CAN..........IF HE IS THE PRESIDENT FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET A SINGLE THING DONE AND THEN THE WHINING WILL BEGIN...AND YOU ALL WILL SEE THE MISTAKE YOU HAVE MADE ..TOO LATE THEN....  YOU THINK YOU HAVE IT BAD NOW ,WELL YOU WILL HAVE 4 MORE YEARS OF THE SAME AND WORSE WHEN YOU ALL SEE THAT OBAMA WAS NOT READY......YOU WILL GET NO SYMPATHY FROM ANYONE IN THE WORLD...  USE YOUR HEAD PEOPLE......
The only problem with the "naive and inexperienced on foreign policy" charge is that it implies that McCain and Bush are not naive and have the right kind of experience.  America knows that's blatantly wrong.  Bush/McCain experience caused us to be stuck in a failed war in the wrong country fighting the wrong people for the wrong reasons.  Is that really the experience America wants?  Or do we want to try something else?  Because, to me, it obviously isn't working.
Theodore Roosevelt developed a foreign policy he labeled as "walk softly and carry a big stick." By "walk" softly, I don't think he had arrogance in mind. We do ourselves a great disservice with arrogance. Someone needs to tell Bush.
"Bush Hugger" McCain thinks he can distance himself from the most crooked presidential administration ever to disgrace the White House.

Notice how yesterday "NeoNazi" Bush told the Arabs that their leaders should show their people "dignity and respect".  Yeah just like he did by demonizing anyone who criticized him here, obviously the hypocrit in chief meant that they should do as he says not as he does.

Then the Tyrant says that we should not allow Iran to learn how to enrich uranium and in the next breath said that Iran was enriching uranium.  As always he can't even get the facts straight as Iran is already enriching uranium and it started on his watch because he kept shooting off his arrogant ignorant mouth scaring the people of Iran into voting in a radical nutcase leader to counter our radical nutcase leader.

Go Obama 08/12!
It is still possible for HRC, but it's not likely. Math, it is what it is.  

As of Monday, May 19, 2008

(omitting FL and MI)

There are only 408 available delegates (189 of which will be elected) remaining to get to 2026

BHO needs 125.5 or 30.8% of the total remaining delegates
HRC needs 302.5 or 74.1% of the total remaining delegates


~~~~~ IF you count FL (as is) and MI (59 vs 69 as last proposed)

There are still only 408 available delegates remaining to get to 2182

BHO needs 161.5 or 39.6% of the total remaining delegates
HRC needs 297.5 or 72.9% of the total remaining delegates


~~~~~ IF you count FL (as is) and skip MI

There are still only 408 available delegates remaining to get to 2118.5

BHO needs 157 or 38.5% of the total remaining delegates
HRC needs 303 or 74.3% of the total remaining delegates
John McCain reminds me of John F. Kennedy: Naval War Hero; once in a generation politician.

Obama doesn't remind me of John F. Kennedy. Obama's in his rookie Senate term, Kennedy was a second term Senator in '60. Obama's national debut was at the 2004 convention, Sen. Kennedy actually ran for the VP nomination at the '56 convention preceeding his '60 nomination. Obama has no national security credentials--none. Kennedy, on the other hand, had visited Vietnam and several other countries as a Congressman and Senator. Kennedy, as the son of the Ambassodor to Great Britain in 1939, was in the gallery of the House of Commons when Britain declared war against Germany. Kennedy had tons of national security experience, and Obama has none.

So, I'm voting for McCain. McCain's the one who reminds me of John F. Kennedy. McCain is a once in a generation candidate.
Richard Engel....great job!  

Bob, Chicago
Isn’t this crazy!  It was just a few weeks ago that the conversation was the Super Delegates picking Hillary against Obama having the most popular votes.
And the big question was, what are the Blacks going to do?
I guess the question now is what are the WHITES going to do?

What is one to do!.
I've lived my entire life in Wyoming and Montana. First time I will ever get to hear a presidential candidate speak is Obama, tonight at 7:30 here in Bozeman. Montana always throws it's three to the Right but this time it may be different. If the west votes as a block there is a new CW and a new "Regional" power center.
The times they are a changin.

GObama!
65,000 Oregonians can't be wrong.
Senator Obama has already won the foreign debate in my book.  When he talked about Hammas being stronger because of bush policies and he mentioned "Fahtah"(sp) I am cemented in my belief that Obama has a firm understanding of the type of political scheme represented in the MiddleEast.  I am an American Jew that believes Senator Obama supports Israel and will defend her always as he will the United States of America!

Obama 08
Nice to show Iowans that the candidate hasn't forgotten them, just because the caucus is past. Especially when it looks like Iowa might just be in play this year.
So many people have been scrambling to spin Obama's naive debate gaffe early on when he said he'd talk directly to enemies. But the fact still remains, Obama had no idea what he was talking about, and he said nothing about preconditions or what he now refers to as "preparation" for such talks.
Our country will be left wounded by the Bush administration only to be led now by an unqualified amateur. But at least, it will be a democrat unqualified amateur;I guess that's something. Just pray that he doesn't refer to some world leader's wife as "sweetie."And remember The flip flopper is Barack Obama. Mr Appeasment Obama was backing the Palestinians just 18 months ago, until one of his aides reminded him of the strong Jewish vote in Florida
A candidate who cannot get elected is being nominated by a party that cannot be defeated, while a candidate who is eminently electable is running as the nominee of a party doomed to defeat.

In this environment, McCain can win by running to the center.
Obama '08!
I saw John McBush share on TV how the end of his 3rd Bush term would look like ... another Bush, with a new twist, weekly press briefings and even going before congress to be questioned, just like the PM of the UK!  McBush spare us the torture!  I'm voting Democrat!
I watched part of the interview with Richard Engle this AM on "Morning Joe".  I don't care what your political leanings are, this guy is an ignoramus of the highest order (as well as a lot of other things I will refrain from stating).

With Engle asked him about the situation on the ground in Iraq, he said that Engle's statement did not match what he had heard from (supposedly) Iraqis on the ground, but that he (RE) was "entitled to his opinion".  WHAAAAT?  Last I knew, Richard Engle knows of what he speaks BECAUSE HE IS ON THE GROUND covering the story.  When's the last time Bush actually talked to one of the people?  Oh, yeah - NEVER.  

Bush needs to shut up - the sooner the better.  I hope KO comments about this tonight.  That interview (from the parts I saw) looks like a complete farce.
So the mcbombers are going to try to play hardball .Good because it will make it easier to bring all the skelletons out of the bombers closet.Like what he did to his first wife who was in a car wreck while McCain was in Nam,she never told him about her troubles.She was injured and was on crutches when LIL bomber got home.He divoriced her and married the beer baron a few months later.Her family has taken care of the  Mccain ever since.Its all there all people need to do is google John Mccain or Cindy McCain theres  plenty there to see.John Please keep G.W.McBush doing your talking for you, the more he talks the closer we can tie you two together.
If all the McCain campaign has as retort is the lame Ayers comment; they are more devoid of any real ideas than I thought. These are LOBBYISTS with all of their nefarious clients buying influence with McCain's senate term and now with his presidential campaign. A McCain presidency may be owned by totalitarian dictatorships. I would not be surprised if some of his lobbyists did business with the Bil Laden family; George Bush did!
Think of it; a presidency owned by Bin Laden's family. That's what a McCain presidency represents.
If you want to vote for this fraud McCain, check out this site:
http://therealmccain.com/
McCain could debate himself; he has so many flip flops!
McCain is wrong for America.
Obama will say anything to get support. He rides the wind like a bird, tweaking his "position" this way and that depending on the situation. But apparently once you're under the spell there's no turning away.

But if you want to vote for an incapable leader just because he lies really well... I don't know what to tell you.
where are the comments
I like Barack Obama because he doesn't have all that worthless Washington experience.  He hasn't been around Washington long enough to be corrupted the way "Beltway" McCain has.  He hasn't been sleeping with the lobbyist enemy the way "Lobbyist Lover" McCain has.

Go Obama 08/12!  
weiner...hehehe
The problem for McCain is - it's not 'nobility on an issue', it's his whole central message of "I'm a maverick, I don't kowtow to lobbyists', etc...

You can't go around saying you aren't beholden to lobbyists and then surround yourself by them. Charlie Black will leave the campaign before this is all over, because McCain himself set himself up with this, with all his 'straight talk'.
McCain lead the investigation against Jack Abramoff.  K Street can't stand McCain.  The media never mentions how if it wasn't for McCain we would have never found out about Abramoff.  McCain is not liked by big business.  He has gone after drug companies and tabacco companies.  McCain is being distorted and will lose the election on lies.
I just love the new repugnant one's campaign slogan of "The Change You Deserve".  Yes I see their new health plan now.  They'll promise free prescriptions of Effexor to the whole country.

Yep they'll give us all enough anti-depressant, anti-psychotic pills so we're all too whacked out to care what they do to destroy our democracy with a third Bush term.

Go Obama 08/12!  
Hey NBC and affiliates - Why don't you stop spreading the baseless allegation that Bush's speech last week in Israel was directed at Obama?  It reflected the same policies he has been advancing for the last 7 years.  White House aides admitted the speech could be seen as a knock on JIMMY CARTER, so they tweaked the speech to downplay those connections.  Andrea Mitchell on NBC news last week stated flat out that Bush intended to take a shot at Obama.  This is irresponsible partisan journalism.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1037810

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google