ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain unloads on Obama

Posted: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:49 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann
CHICAGO -- In the home city of his chief rival, John McCain this morning diverted from his prepared remarks to re-continue last week's blistering back-and-forth with Barack Obama over his proposed negotiation with the president of Iran.

The added comment came in response to Obama's statement in Oregon over the weekend that Iran presents a "tiny" threat in comparison to that posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Noting Iran's aspiration to obtain nuclear weapons, as well as its president's much publicized antipathy towards Israel, McCain said today that the danger posed by the rogue nation has the potential to "become very dire indeed."  Echoing last week's exchanges, McCain said that the proposed meeting demonstrates "the depth of Sen. Obama's inexperience and reckless judgment."

"They might not become a superpower," he said today of Iran. "But the threat the government of Iran poses is anything but tiny."

The unscheduled slam came in advance of a pre-written critique of Obama's trade and tax policies. He notably brought up the primary-race flap over an Obama advisor who telegraphed to the Canadian government that the Illinois senator's critique of NAFTA was a purely political move. McCain called that move -- which caused a stir before the Ohio primary in March -- "not impressive," "inconsistent,: and evidence of "bad judgment."

"Sen. Obama is fond of scolding others for engaging in the 'old-style politics,'" he said. "But when he plays on fears of foreign trade, he's resorting to the oldest kind of politics there is."

He continued, "It's the kind of politics that exploits problems instead of solving them, that breeds resentment instead of opportunity."

McCain's audience in Obama's hometown was quiet and respectful as he raised questions about his rival's judgment. But three pink-clad protestors interrupted McCain early in his speech, chanting their objections to McCain's support of the Iraq War. The three women, who wore pink aprons and carried banners emblazoned with anti-war slogans, were escorted out without incident. The audience at McCormick place booed to drown out the protesters' chants.

"These things happen on occasion," said the senator after the hubbub died down. "And we move on."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Senator McCain's advisors need to vet his comments for accuracy if he wants to keep riding the "straight talk express".  It has already been debunked ... several times ... that the Canadian government/NAFTA story was incorrect in its inferrence as to Senator Obama's future intentions.  
McCain . . . again he doesn't know what the HELL he's talking abut.  I was CLINTON's people that did the old "wink, wink!  Let me see what Obama says . . .!
Old man yelling at cloud
Ok I agree Iran is bad ,but McBush has lost it. They dont have a nuclear weapon as of yet. Bad is bad an worse was The Soviet Union. McBush has lost it.
Senator McCain, please leave our fine city and take your hatemongers with you.  Or do you need to stop by the Viagra Triangle and see if you can find the next Cindy?
To echo proven fallacies. Man McCain, you realy are your father's son. How the heck then, are you older than daddy Bush?
Our own NIE said that Iran has HALTED it's nuclear program. Years ago. Is McCain reading a different report?

Also, pressed by reporters, the US commander in Iraq could not pinpoint any substantial supplies of Iranian weapons in Iraq.

Where is the ACTUAL threat, John?
The only thing tiny is McCain's intellegence level. To actually think that it is appeasement to talk with other nations is rediculous. As was pointed out many of the 20th Century's most prominent political leaders talked with their advisaries... including the Republican demi-god Ronald Reagan. Not only that but Defense Sec. Gates said we should be engaging in conversations with Iran.

I am not quite sure what type of vehicle the staight talk express is, but one thing I do know that it is severely off course and has a few blown tires, not to mention a driver who has lost his bearings...
The Soviet Union had literally thousands of nuclear missles pointed at the United States, and yet both President Kennedy and President Reagan were smart enough to engage the Soviet Union's leadership in constructive diplomatic dialogue. So far, Iran doesn't even have ONE nuclear weapon, and chicken-John McCain is afraid to engage Iran in constructive diplomacy! Talk about Bush III!!! McCain is just more of the same "bury your head in the sand" foreign policy that got us into our current problems in the first place. No more McBush. No more McSame. No more McLame. We need new leadership.
All we need is another warmongerer in office for eight more years. Heaven help us all. These indigent nations just might be willing to talk to Obama and garner on a bloodless reconcilation. If these warmongerers stay in office, it will never end. These foreign countries are tired of talking to the USA about foreign policy, because they are getting the same old crap from the same old people. They are smart enough to know that the best way to keep getting what you got is to keep doing what you're doing. Obama can fix this and they'd better let him.
OLD MAN YELLS AT CLOUD!  Is it time to commit grandpa to Shady Acres Nursing Home?
McCain knows what he's talking about.  It's obvious he's well versed and experienced in "the oldest kind of politics there is."
Are you kidding me?!?!  He brought up the Canadian incident?  He must think he's still running against Clinton or he got it from the Clinton camp.  Notice how he got the facts wrong about it?  Oh well, just another example of saying anything to try and win an election.  Can't wait to see the McCain/Obama debates.
They have you on tape, MdFossil, saying we'll have to talk to Hamas. Shut up and sit down. You're done for.
Bryd just endorsed Obama. Talk about change!!!
Actually, Obama is correct.  At this point in time Iran is a tiny threat if a threat at all.  And the only thing that has really allowed it to register is the policy of Bush (to be repeated and extended by McCain) inclduign Iraq.

And Obama has said he is willing to sit down and talk with world leaders (and yes, believe it or not Iran is part of the world) not necessarily negotiate with them, although that should not be ruled out.  remember, Iran has more influence and is better liked in Iraq than the US is.

Also, the whole NAFTA-gate was blown out of proportion, since it was not even a paid advisor or part of Obama's primary staff that talked with Canada, and Canada has now said they misrepresented what was said.

Statements like these show why McCain is not the straight talker he says he is.
Good way to distract from McBush's TOTAL LACK OF AN ECONOMIC PLAN!! I'm sure he'd like to keep this Iranian nonsense going forver---Obama shouldn't let him!
"McCain's audience in Obama's hometown was quiet and respectful as he raised questions about his rival's judgment."

...either that or they fell asleep.

PS - "re-continue"?  What kind of English is that?
Except that Obama's advisor did no such thing.  Obama's advisor restates Obama's position on NAFTA not contradicted it.  I guess McCain conveniently forgot that.  Iran will not be a large threat once we have President Obama negotiating with them and our troops out of IRAQ.  Look at it this way, if you lived in the Middle East, how do you think you would feel about the United States.  Our actions there over the years have been reprehensible.  How would we feel if China or Russia has a large chunk of there armed forces deployed in Mexico.  I support the troops, but I deplore Bush's cowboy diplomacy.
The point Obama was obviously making is that we talked to Superpower USSR (1000's of nukes pointed at us, multiple wars of aggression), but a relatively small threat, Iran (no nukes, no offensive wars) is somehow such an enemy they are off limits.  Its patently absurd on its face..

If all McCain has are these silly arguments about word games on an issue that is allegedly his strength, then I will go ahead and start getting my hopes up for November.
Really; does anyone cares what this flip-flopper name John McCain says? He and Hillary are both delusional and maybe she should be his VEEP. Then 1/4 of her supporters will be happy and she can finally feel like she has a purpose and then stop running something she has already lost (Democratic Nomination). John McCain is getting help from her anyway..she might as well be on his ticket. That way then can lose together.  
Oh, this guy is so right.  Just like when...

2002, 2003: Winning In Iraq Would Be "Easy." In the run up to War with Iraq, McCain repeatedly emphasized that the conflict would be "easy." Speaking in September 2002 about the prospect of invading Iraq, McCain said he thought it would not be a difficult conflict. McCain said, "I believe that the success [in Iraq] will be fairly easy." In January of 2003, McCain again predicted the same about invading Iraq, saying, "we will win this conflict. We will win it easily." [1]

2003: The End Is "Very Much In Sight." Senator McCain was asked "At what point will America be able to say the war was won?" McCain said there were oil fields to secure and "die-hards" to take care of but "it's clear that the end is very much in sight, and today I think Americans should be very proud of their leadership, their technology...There are still some foreigners, Syrians and others hanging around. But it won't be long. It will be a fairly short period of time, but this happens in wars. I'm confident that once they are confident the area is no longer a threat to the Marines and to or army troops that they'll start imposing discipline. In the meantime, we'll have a short period of chaos." [2]

2005: McCain Said That Another Year Will Prove "Stay the Course" Is Working. "McCain believes that the U.S., and the cause of Iraqi independence, are moving forward in Iraq, a little bit at a time. 'I think the situation on the ground is going to improve,' he says. 'Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.'" [3]

2006: McCain Said That Iraq Was "On The Right Track" As The Country Moved Closer To Civil War. Speaking on the "Imus in the Morning" radio show on March 1, 2006, McCain played down the increasing civil violence in Iraq. When Imus remarked that Iraq "already looks like a civil war," McCain responded, saying, "I keep trying to look at the bright side of this because we have to because the consequences of failure are catastrophic. But the gathering of the seven most respected religious leaders the day before yesterday, calling for calm and calling for some kind of reconciliation, I think, was important. I think, at least we're on the right track here." [4]

2003: McCain Said Bush Led With "Clarity" And Did Not Exaggerate the Case for War. During an interview with a live audience, Senator McCain praised President Bush on his leadership on the Iraq war and said, "I think the president has led with great clarity and I think he's done a great job leading the country, don't you all?" And asked if he think the president exaggerated the case for war, McCain said, "I don't think so. And I think that it's obvious that the 16 words should not have appeared in his speech. He acknowledged that again today. But I think that he made a strong case and I think that case has been verified with discovery of mass graves and the brutality of this incredible regime." [5]

2003: McCain Proclaimed "Massive Victory" in Iraq and Credited Combat-Readiness for "Our Victory" in Afghanistan and Iraq. "Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom demonstrated to the world what we saw just 12 years ago. We went to war as the most combat-ready force in the world. The value of that readiness is clear. We won a massive victory in a few weeks, and we did so with very limited loss of American and allied lives. We were able to end aggression with minimum overall loss of life, and we were even able to greatly reduce the civilian casualties of Afghani and Iraqi citizens. . . . Our technology edge in Afghanistan and Iraq would have been meaningless if we did not have men and women trained to use it. Having the best weapons system platforms in the world would not have given us our victory if we had not had the right command and control facilities, maintenance capabilities, and munitions." [6]

2006: McCain Said War Was On The Right Track. On March 1, 2006, McCain played down the increasing civil violence in Iraq. When host Don Imus remarked that Iraq "already looks like a civil war," McCain responded, saying, "I keep trying to look at the bright side of this because we have to because the consequences of failure are catastrophic." McCain added, "I think, at least we're on the right track here." [7]

2007: McCain Said Bush's "War Machine" Is On Track. Senator McCain insists "We are showing signs of success" in Iraq and "with the Virginia Military Institute as a backdrop, McCain plans to argue" that "President Bush's war machine is finally getting on track after four years." [8]
2005: McCain Rejects Korea, Germany Model for Iraq. "In fact, when asked specifically if he thought the U.S. military should set up shop in Iraq along the lines of what has been established in post-WWII Germany or Japan -- something McCain has repeatedly advocated during the campaign -- the senator offered nothing short of a categorical 'no.' 'I would hope that we could bring them all home,' he said on MSNBC. 'I would hope that we would probably leave some military advisers, as we have in other countries, to help them with their training and equipment and that kind of stuff.' Host Chris Matthews pressed McCain on the issue. 'You've heard the ideological argument to keep U.S. forces in the Middle East. I've heard it from the hawks. They say, keep United States military presence in the Middle East, like we have with the 7th Fleet in Asia. We have the German...the South Korean component. Do you think we could get along without it?' McCain held fast, rejecting the very policy he urges today. 'I not only think we could get along without it, but I think one of our big problems has been the fact that many Iraqis resent American military presence,' he responded. 'And I don't pretend to know exactly Iraqi public opinion. But as soon as we can reduce our visibility as much as possible, the better I think it is going to be.'" [9]

January 2005: "Reduce Our Visibility As Much As Possible." "No, I would hope that we could bring them all home. I would hope that we would probably leave some military advisors...As soon as we can reduce our visibility as much as possible I think the better this is going to be." [10]

November 2007: McCain Rejected Korean Analogy to Iraq. Asked by Charlie Rose if he thought the South Korean model would serve as an "analogy of where Iraq might be…in terms of an American presence over the next, say, 20, 25 years," McCain replied, "I don't think so." "Even if there are no casualties?" Rose questioned. "No," McCain reiterated. "I can see an American presence for a while. But eventually I think because of the nature of the society in Iraq and the religious aspects of it that America eventually withdraws." [11]

January 2008: McCain Said US May Stay In Iraq For 100 Years, Long Term American Presence In Iraq Analogous To South Korea. At a New Hampshire town hall when McCain was asked "President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years." McCain responded: "Maybe 100" and "that would be fine with me." McCain explained his 100 year remark by drawing an analogy to the long-term American presence in South Korea: "We've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That'd be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed." [12]

He's just not a credible source of opinion.
Hillary supporters:  Please note that McCain is not unloading on Hillary.  Why is that?

Because they're BFFs? (as a Dem, you should hope not!)
or,
Because the Republican Party -- despite its many failings -- can do the math?

It's time to unite against the Republican threat to our reproductive choices and against the Republican threat to our children being killed in a needless, pre-emptive war.

Please -- become a critical thinker and not an emotional reactionary.  Hillary has lost this race because of HER behavior and continues to be divisive, polarizing and pathological.  This is NOT about glass ceilings or sexism or feminism.

55 y.o. woman with a brain who uses it.
I am sure glad that JFK was in office with Cuban missile crisis of 1962 - imagine the mess Bush or McCain would have made.  Remember there was not a hot line in place at the time.

Wonder why McCain is in Chicago?  Is trying to make up to Boeing (US firm) for the Airbus (French) debacle.  The Rezko trial is in deliberation - is he hoping to get the same deal as other Republican party members.

Rezko has also raised money for Republicans: former Illinois Governors Jim Edgar and George Ryan, the late Rosemont Mayor Don Stephens and he co-chaired a mega-million-dollar fund-raiser for President George W. Bush in 2003.

Hm on can only imagine - speak with two faces is at it again.
I agree with McCain. Obama is naive.  Also, people are jumping on McCain's staff. Why has not more been given to the fact that Obama had an advisor resign who stated he had been regularly speaking with Hamas? Why is a senator's advisor talking with Hamas? The same Hamas who has endorsed Obama?  Of course, that's the same Hamas whose American leader is a listed fundraiser on Obama's website.  Check out Kind Hearts for Terrorism for more on that assoication. Does that not scare the hell out of people?  
Hey Mini-Me,

Iran's dislike of Israel is not brand new news.  I would like you or anyone else to find an Arabic nation that does like Israel.

This election is about more than Iran.  Each election the Republicans attempt to allow the Middle East to determine our elected president.

Why don't we just let the citizens of the Middle East elect our next president, since our domestic issues don't matter.

If he wants to organize a war with Iran, let him fill out an application to interview for the Secretary of Defense position under the Obama Administration.

I want our economy fixed first.
Bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb Iran.
Catchy tune.....
McWar's new campaign slogan:
"America, you can never have enough WAR!!!!
No dipomacy, we'll destroy or be destroyed".
Does anyone worry about how our "hopeful" candidate   (who's only credentials are one term in the Senate, a book he wrote, and a speech he gave) will match-up against McCain? My God the repubs are going to tear us apart in Nov! He sure is an "inspiration" though.
An honesty issue here too.  Let's get some poll numbers on this.  Then in a few weeks after having gained the attention of HRC, Obama and the DNC - revisit these polls to see how far this fraud has fallen.
Ugh.  McCain was funny on SNL - but I'm tired of his campaigning.  

Also, I really don't see how this is 'unloading' on Obama.  He's merely pointing out that he disagrees with Obama on Iran (and other issues).

http://thepajamapundit.com/
Can we trust a Senator who has previously written and sung the song "Bomb Iran" to the tune of Barbaran?  Can we trust that Senator to be objective when it comes to dealings with Iran?  I personally wouldn't think so...
"And we move on."

Yup, and just watch the country move on from the same tired old sabre-rattling BS.

We don't need another idiot in the WH who believes that simply telling someone who's wrong that they're wrong is wrong. We don't need someone with such a complete ignorance of history that they can't tell the difference between talking to a rogue leader, and giving them half a country. Like Chris Matthews said, it's pathetic.

McCain is just proving that he'd be another term of GWB, which a hefty majority of this country is smart enough to realize would be a very bad thing.
Bomb, Bomb, Bomb !

Bomb, Bomb Iran !!

There's the ticket !!

It sounds sooooooo Presidential

Just like calling your wife a c*nt
Nice!  It looks like the dems are about to elect Obush, and 4 more years of inexperienced leadership!
They might become a super power !!!   Iraq may have WMD's  !!!  North Korea is in axis of evil !!! The bogey man is under the bed !!! Just start shooting and ask questions later.  WE NEED A CHANGE !!!!!
Off the topic, but will someone please tell me what happened to Obama's previously substantial lead over Billary in Oregon?? Today's poll has him up by only 4 points!! To my knowledge, there has NOT been another Reverend Wright sighting during the past week, at which time he was up by 15 to 20 points! Perhaps McCain is worrying about the wrong candidate. Please someone from Oregon tell me what's going on out there? Now this is cause for REAL concern if this is valid poll.
I have always voted Democrat, but this is too scary to ignore. I like Obama's domestic policies more, but our countries security is more important.
"McCain said today that the danger posed by the rogue nation has the potential to "become very dire indeed."


Just looked at what's happened in this country in the last 7 years - rogue hardly covers it. We've scared the crap out of the whole world with our insane "leaders."
I have always voted Democrat, but this is too scary to ignore. I like Obama's domestic policies more, but our countries security is more important.
John McSame:

You promise 4 MORE YEARS of GWB economic failures.

You promise 100 OR MORE YEARS OF WAR.

You promise 4 MORE YEARS OF GWB.


John McSame IS GWB.


No matter what you say about Obama, at least you can't say he is 4 MORE YEARS OF GWB.

Thank God

GOP and MCBush are history.


Obama 08
THERE GOES THE OBAMA HAS BETTER JUDGMENT THEORY.

Obama is reckless, naive, and a wuss.
The difference, Johnny, between your fear-mongering and Obama's is that NAFTA isn't a free-trade deal; it's a bait-and-tariff deal. People have a right to be afraid of it because it only assists corporate and conglomerate interests.

But you'd rather whitewash all the drawbacks to free trade "agreements" (by the way, nothing could be further from real free trade than NAFTA) and pretend that they don't exist. Tell me, when you say that you're going to cut taxes for those making over $200,000 a year, and Obama says he's going to cut taxes for those making under $100,000, who do you think is going to win the argument? I mean, really? And doesn't it say a lot that you're trying to portray Obama as an elitist?
Whether it's the economy, the environment, foreign policy, fiscal policy, government competency, judicial fairness... you name it... we've tried it their way, and it hasn't worked.

They have failed miserably and the republican agenda isn't what America needs right now.  More, it isn't what Americans need right now.
Hmmmm....so mcbush is calling Obama "not impressive", "inconsistent", and having "bad judgement"?? What exactly does mccain have to show for his so called "experience and judgement"?
MSNBC - at least pretend you are journalists, please.  Sen. Obama did NOT say that the threats from Iran were "tiny"... the reference to "tiny" referred to the facts that certain countries such as Cuba, Iran, Iraq were "tiny" when compared to the Soviet Union.   When you say "tiny" threat in quotes you are implying that those are the words Sen. Obama used -- there were not.
Why talk when you can start a war, bilk the public for billions, enriching your cronies and their friends and divert attention from issues like global warming, poverty, hunger, jobs, health care, education, etc.  The world needs a new form of dialogue and an old man mired in the last century can't even imagine it.  What he can't imagine he fears and he'll try to make the rest of us fear it.
In less than 24 hour's, I will get to cast My Vote ( as other's have) for the next President Of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama. I will cast this vote with Pride as I have watched Barack since he announced he was running. He is an Extraordinary Man with Judgement, an understanding of the problems that we face as American's, & an insight into World affairs.My vote in Kentucky's primary goes to Barack Hussein Obama !

Delusional Thinking By Common Sense American's is Over !
It's a sad sad day...

when McCain continues to try capitolizing on our fears of the unknown - like Bush did.  Using the same policy playbook that has us hunting for nonexistent WMD's, obligated to bear the death and reconstruction costs for another country (like the USA = Social Services Welfare), and making us fear the "unknown" that lurks around every corner, or within other country.  That's Pathetic!!
Old man yells at cloud!
OMG - bad judgment - as he fires more of his campaign staff.

LMFAO
He's "unloading" on obama and he can't even hardly read the damn teleprompter.

This guy can't be serious. I appreciate your service and everything, but please don't pretend you know all there is to know about foreign policy just because your plane crashed in Vietnam. Find some humility, JSM.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1040525

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google