ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain unloads on Obama

Posted: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:49 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann
CHICAGO -- In the home city of his chief rival, John McCain this morning diverted from his prepared remarks to re-continue last week's blistering back-and-forth with Barack Obama over his proposed negotiation with the president of Iran.

The added comment came in response to Obama's statement in Oregon over the weekend that Iran presents a "tiny" threat in comparison to that posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Noting Iran's aspiration to obtain nuclear weapons, as well as its president's much publicized antipathy towards Israel, McCain said today that the danger posed by the rogue nation has the potential to "become very dire indeed."  Echoing last week's exchanges, McCain said that the proposed meeting demonstrates "the depth of Sen. Obama's inexperience and reckless judgment."

"They might not become a superpower," he said today of Iran. "But the threat the government of Iran poses is anything but tiny."

The unscheduled slam came in advance of a pre-written critique of Obama's trade and tax policies. He notably brought up the primary-race flap over an Obama advisor who telegraphed to the Canadian government that the Illinois senator's critique of NAFTA was a purely political move. McCain called that move -- which caused a stir before the Ohio primary in March -- "not impressive," "inconsistent,: and evidence of "bad judgment."

"Sen. Obama is fond of scolding others for engaging in the 'old-style politics,'" he said. "But when he plays on fears of foreign trade, he's resorting to the oldest kind of politics there is."

He continued, "It's the kind of politics that exploits problems instead of solving them, that breeds resentment instead of opportunity."

McCain's audience in Obama's hometown was quiet and respectful as he raised questions about his rival's judgment. But three pink-clad protestors interrupted McCain early in his speech, chanting their objections to McCain's support of the Iraq War. The three women, who wore pink aprons and carried banners emblazoned with anti-war slogans, were escorted out without incident. The audience at McCormick place booed to drown out the protesters' chants.

"These things happen on occasion," said the senator after the hubbub died down. "And we move on."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

John McCain may be right about Iran being a truly dangerous risk in the future, but didn't Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, and John F. Kennedy all speak with the USSR?  

The best analogy to Iran right now is China in 1970. In 1970 China was funneling money and weapons through a tributary regime North Vietnam, who in turn was funnelling money and weapons to insurgents, the Viet Cong, fighting the US military.  Today Iran is funnelling money and weapons to Syria, Shiite Militia's in Iraq as well as terrorist groups in Lebanon and Occupied Palestine, all fighting us or our close allies.   To acheive normal relations with China, Nixon TALKED and VISITED China.  Although, there need to be preliminary discussions at diplomatic levels before a full summit is called for; Senator Obama's willingness to talk to our enemies is true to the strength shown by previous administrations.  Not the weakness shown by the current administration.  
Mc Cain said...."They might not become a superpower," he said today of Iran. "But the threat the government of Iran poses is anything but tiny."

So in other words, they both agree that (a) Iran presents a very real threat and (b) that threat is "tiny" as compared to a superpower like the Soviet Union was. And yet leave it to McCain to parse Obama's words in order to justify his latest rant.

Maybe we should be asking McCain why he embraces the same foreign policy that has strengthened Iran, failed to kill or capture Osama bin Laden and resulted in the recruitment of more terrorists throughout the world.
"the kind of politics that exploits problems instead of solving them, that breeds resentment instead of opportunity"

and what does the belicose attitude toward foreign countries produce?
McCain's solution - nuclear war.
Mr. McDraft...God Help the World if your finger ever gets on "THE BUTTON".  It's too early for the end!

Bob, Chicago  
Well, at least McCain isn't insulting Michelle Obama or impugning Barack's patriotism. I guess we have to give him marks for attacking Obama on the issues. I wonder when someone will point out that Israel is armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons?
McSame has promoted an agenda that has, through time, been tested and has failed.

Outside of the top 1%, there's less income growth than in any past business cycle. The key macro-indicators, such as employment, GDP growth, and investment have also faired uniquely poorly. The anti-government, deregulatory agenda has led to fatal incompetence, a massive housing bubble, ailing global credit markets, and near-recessionary growth for the US. The "ownership society" is a cruel joke: homeownership rates are falling for the first time in decades.

FOUR MORE YEARS of this?
First every dictator is Hitler, now every rogue nation is the Soviet Union.  Gimme a break!  

Next thing you know McCain will be saying that Obama killed Jesus.....or am I too late?
Senator McCain is a fossil of the cold war and can't seem to grasp the reality of TODAY. He believes that pushing a war agenda will win the GOP the white house, ala warhawk. My questions is this: If experience and foreign policy is your strongest card, why play it now? Why embrace Bush politics, when the president has a 28% approval rating? The McCain campaign is woefully unprepared for the Obama juggernaught. It's like comparing a model-T to an Enzo Ferreri. McCain needs to save his best hand for the general in the fall....oh wait, that's his only hand. Better fold now and flip flop early, than wait and get caught doing it later. What reasonable person would think talking to rogue nations ia a sign of weakness? If Bush had talked and not sabre rattled with Iraq, gas wouldn't be sky high and Iran would be balanced by Iraq. There are over 100,000 refugees fleeing Iraq for safer countries, to include our own. Obviously, the current foreign policies are lacking....but hey, what do I know? I'm just a reasonable person.
Hey First Read:

Why didn't you mention that McFossil's speech was interrupted by woman wearing aprons that read: John McCain is in the kitchen with George Bush"? Now, THAT'S news you can use!
ZERO = depth of foreign policy that convinced McCain to vote for the biggest foreign policy blunder (Iraq)

100% = Hypocrisy in McCain's stand to not to talk to hamas 2 years after intending to talk to them

Grandpa you don't have the courage and strength to face even the inferior enemies of US what will you do  when faced with bigger enemy?

Here is what you would be a great fit for: BABY SITING Grandpa at daycare center.
"These things happen on occasion."  I'd bet!
Wow - what a nasty old guy. I lose a little respect for McCain with each day that passes...it makes me sad...
Iran is not a "tiny threat" compared to the Soviet Union.  At least the Soviets were sane and loved their children, too (sorry, Sting).  They may have had much more fire power than Iran, but the Iranians are crazed religious zealots/nuts who will sacrifice anything, including their children or even themselves to destroy the West they see as evil.  They are infinitely more likely to actually use the nukes.  I think it's naive to try to negotiate or appease these guys.  The only thing they will understand is a decisive victory against them or death.  Or, if we are really smart, we can figure out how to kick our oil addiction and let them see how much power they can wield when they and the rest of the middle east are sitting on what would become worthless goo.
I have four important questions for Bush, McCain and the GOP!

1. Is Iran stronger or weaker since Bush’s invasions of Iraq?

2. Has Osama bin Laden been killed or captured since Bush’s invasion of Iraq?

3. Are we paying less for gas now or before Bush’s invasion of Iraq?

4. Is our economy better of now or before Bush’s invasion of Iraq?

If you answer these questions truthfully, is there any way you want to continue down the same foreign policy blunders of the last seven years?

This is a not a difficult question, most 3rd graders could answer this one.
Sit down & shut up, McWar!  Don't you have more lobbyists to fire?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1040525

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google