ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain vs. Obama: A glimpse of the fall

Posted: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:16 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The New York Times’ Zeleny notes that yesterday's Memorial Day speeches by McCain and Obama in New Mexico provided a glimpse of the fall debate on Iraq. "Will the Iraq war and the nation’s security once again be the chief concern to voters in the general election? In a 20-minute speech, with the flags of all branches of the armed forces at his back, Mr. McCain made 14 references to Iraq. Later, he invited Mr. Obama to join him on a tour of Iraq. (Mr. Obama did not immediately say whether he would accept.) ‘As long as there is a reasonable prospect for succeeding in this war,’ Mr. McCain said, ‘then we must not choose to lose it.’”

“Or will economic anxieties at home and a fierce disapproval over the direction of the country be of higher concern to voters? In 10 minutes of prepared remarks, Mr. Obama did not mention Iraq, only raising it when someone in the audience spoke critically of the war in a 30-minute question-and-answer session. ‘It’s going to take some work,’ Mr. Obama said, ticking through a lengthy list of domestic challenges awaiting the next president, including health care and improving the quality of life for veterans. ‘It might even take two terms.’” 

Per NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann, John McCain didn't mention Barack Obama in his remarks in Albuquerque yesterday, despite a bruising back-and-forth last week over Obama's lack of military experience. But in the afternoon, in an interview with the AP, McCain criticized Obama for failing to visit Iraq since 2006. Asked about comments by Sen. Lindsey Graham, a chief surrogate who criticized Obama yesterday for his lack of understanding of post-surge Iraq, McCain dismissed his rival as an amateur in his understanding and involvement in the conflict. Noting that Obama has not visited the region since before the surge, he said, "He really has no experience or knowledge or judgment about the issue of Iraq. And he has wanted to surrender for a long time."

McCain agreed with Graham's assessment on Sunday's Face the Nation program that he and Obama could visit Iraq together in the coming months. "Sure, it would be fine," he said of a proposed trip to the region together. "I go back every few months because things are changing in Iraq," he said. "I would also seize the opportunity to educate Sen. Obama along the way."

In his critique, McCain also referenced Obama's plan for a calendar to draw down troop presence, painting it as an unjustifiable and uninformed move. "For him to talk about dates for withdrawal -- which basically is surrender -- in Iraq after we're succeeding so well is I think really inexcusable," he said.

Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki responded with this comment: "Sen. Obama thinks Memorial Day is a day to honor our nation's veterans, not a day for political posturing." Yet the Obama campaign also said it didn't make sense for McCain to criticize Obama for wanting a timetable for withdrawal while McCain envisions having most US troops out of Iraq by 2013.

Also, the McCain campaign continues to pounce on what it believes is Obama backtracking on meeting with Iran's Ahmadinejad. Obama and his surrogates have taken pains over the last few weeks to emphasize they wouldn't meet with Ahmadinejad because he's not the actual leader of Iran. It's an interesting attempt at parsing that Obama's folks are hoping neutralizes the McCain/RNC attacks.

This morning, the McCain campaign notes that Obama -- at a September 2007 press conference -- said he’d meet with Ahmadinejad specifically.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

EXPERIENCE MATTERS????

DICK CHENEY FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

Rather than go to Iraq to meet with all of the Generals, Obama would be better served by going to Walter Reed Hospital and meet with the grunts who really know what's going on.
First of all, which one of the millions of armchair quarterbacks can tell the difference between Sunni and Shiite? Really? What does it matter? They are fighting and we are in the middle of it. If you remember the last SOU address "we are protecting our vital interests". Straight from the horses mouth. OIL!

This whole 'pull out of Iraq' is like a tug of war between two dogs. Once we let go of the rope, the other one is going to go crashing back and very quickly come running up on us looking for more. Regardless of why we are in this fight, we have to be smart about how we get out. We can't just let go like all of you want.

And as a two time Iraq veteran, I ask that no more VIPs come over to 'visit'. More security and resources go into protecting and transporting those people than the actual effort over there. The money spent on the 'VIP' visits could go towards paying us a bit more than the pitiful 'hazardous duty pay'. Unless of course you want to send more cheerleaders and maybe some Hooters girls.

And the economy... War is business... Business is booming... and we are buying into it. If you were a monster Oil Tycoon would you slash your profits because most of the population doesn't know how to budget their money? If you don't like the gas prices, don't buy as much gas. If we all bought less gas, production would slow, demand would drop and prices would have to fall. But no... we get more help from the government to change our TVs to digital than we do in changing what really matters.
As a retired Army Sergeant Major, I found it John McCain's campaigning during his Memorial Day speech quite offensive.  That is not the time or place for his retoric.  I admit I am an Obama supporter but I would have felt the same way if I wasn't.  Would Senator McCain have talked up a legislative bill during a Memorial Day speech had he not been running for President?
Does McCain want to go to Iraq to look for the WMD that Bush and Cheney told us were there?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1066371

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google