ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Resolving FL and MI

Posted: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:25 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** Resolving Florida and Michigan: After 51 sanctioned contests over the last five months, there are just two dates left on the Democratic primary calendar, and they both occur within the next four days. Sunday is primary day in Puerto Rico (where 55 delegates are at stake and where polls open at 8:00 am ET and close at 3:00 pm ET). And on Tuesday, Montana (16 delegates) and South Dakota (15 delegates) hold their contests. But before those dates comes Saturday’s DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel in DC, where committee members will most likely decide what happens with those Florida and Michigan delegations. Here are two nearly indisputable predictions about Saturday: 1) something WILL be done and 2) the entire delegations from both states will NOT be seated. So the current magic number of 2,026 will not be in effect by Sunday June 1, and we know the magic number will not be 2,210, as hoped for by the Clinton campaign. It's likely to be either 2,118 or 2,131, depending on whether the Rules committee decides superdelegates should be penalized in the same vein as pledged delegates. The question then is how will the Florida and Michigan delegates be allocated. Keep in mind that DNC hard-liners on the Rules committee, who may be the swing vote between the Clinton and Obama forces, are more intent on figuring out a way to punish Michigan more than Florida.

*** Possible scenario I: We’ve hesitated reporting on every rumor we've heard about a potential compromise, but here’s one plan circulating that seems to be gaining momentum: It would halve the votes for all of the Florida delegates, netting Clinton 19 and, more importantly, counting that popular vote. But Michigan's primary results would not be accepted and instead that state's delegates would simply be split 50-50 between Clinton and Obama. All of the delegations, under this compromise, would be seated in full, but each delegate's vote would be counted as 0.5, including the superdelegates. (Keep in mind, when the nine -- cut to 4.5 in this scenario -- Edwards' pledged delegates are factored in for Obama, that reduces Clinton's net to 14.5.) Should this compromise pass, it would mean the new magic number for nomination would be 2,118. And according to our math (bringing Obama’s delegate total to 2,060 with the Edwards delegates, and Clinton’s to 1,876.5), that would put Obama 58 total delegates away from the nomination. Assuming that Obama gets 43 of the 86 remaining pledged delegates from Puerto Rico, Montana, and South Dakota, he would need just 15 more superdelegates to clinch the nomination under this scenario.

*** Possible scenario II: Another resolution would be cutting both state delegations by 50% according to how the primary vote went (and giving Obama Michigan’s uncommitted vote). That would give Clinton a net of 19 in Florida and nine in Michigan for a total of 28. The magic number here also is 2,118, and it would put Obama 62.5 delegates away from clinching the nomination. Assuming Obama splits the remaining pledged delegates, Obama would need 19.5 more superdelegates to clinch the nomination.

*** Possible scenario III: Another scenario floated is a 50% cut of the pledged delegates in both states according to the primary vote, but keep superdelegates at 100%. That would make the magic number 2,131. Obama then would be 65.5 delegates away (and Clinton 242.5). Indeed, the maximum Clinton could pick up as a result of Saturday’s Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting is 91. That’s what Clinton would gain if she gets the delegates seated according to the discounted primary results in Florida and Michigan -- and Obama gets zero out of Michigan, because he doesn’t get any of Michigan’s “uncommitted” vote. If that maximum solution were to happen, Obama’s 161 pledged delegate lead would be cut to 70. But such a scenario at this point seems like, well, a fairy tale. It’s just not going to happen.

*** The agenda: The DNC meeting begins at 9:30 am ET with remarks by DNC chairman Howard Dean and then Rules committee co-chairs Alexis Herman and James Roosevelt. Afterward, Florida’s Jon Ausman presents his challenge (arguing that the DNC was wrong to strip the state of 100% of its superdelegates and more than 50% of its pledged delegates), followed by Florida’s Democratic Party and the Clinton and Obama campaigns. Next, Michigan presents its challenge, followed by the state party and -- once again -- the Clinton and Obama campaigns. Then the committee adjourns for lunch. And after that, the members sit down to reach some type of resolution, which requires a majority of those present of the 30-person panel (13 who back Clinton, eight who support Obama, and nine who are uncommitted, including Herman and Roosevelt; the assumption is that Clinton does not have a working majority). A DNC source tells First Read that the meeting COULD run into Sunday, but they’re hopeful that a resolution is hammered out on Saturday. One other thing to watch: Clinton supporters hold a rally/protest, co-organized by Women Count PAC, outside the hotel beginning at 7:00 am and ending around 4:00 pm ET.

*** Obama’s new pastor problem? So the number of clergymen that McCain and Obama have distanced themselves from now stands at four -- two for each of them. Of course, for Obama, both of his troubled clergymen were a lot closer to him personally than the two McCain had to toss under the bus. Obama’s latest pastor problem comes from Father Michael Pfleger, an Obama friend who said at the very least some unflattering things about Hillary Clinton at Obama’s church this past Sunday. Obama released this statement:  “As I have traveled this country, I've been impressed not by what divides us, but by all that that unites us. That is why I am deeply disappointed in Father Pfleger's divisive, backward-looking rhetoric, which doesn't reflect the country I see or the desire of people across America to come together in common cause.” So how big is this for Obama? The timing isn't helpful. Just as Obama is trying to reach out to Clinton supporters, here is a supporter mocking her using some horrendous language. At a minimum, this will likely have some Democrats wondering (and some Republicans hoping) that the 24-7 camera that apparently is running at Obama's church never runs out of memory. Seriously, this only adds to the CW that the Pew poll underscored yesterday, Obama's problems are all personal while McCain's problems are all issue-based and political.

*** One other thought here: While the right will attempt to tie this Jeremiah Wright, perhaps the correct frame here is by connecting it to today’s Boston Globe op-ed by Geraldine Ferraro. Pfleger and Ferraro represent the difficulties in bringing the party together, as the two have voiced the extreme negative views about the other candidate. This will be a challenge for the Democrats in November.

*** McCain’s McClellan problem? The DNC, meanwhile, has released a new Web video linking McClellan -- and his statement about the “propaganda campaign” to sell the Iraq war -- and McCain’s own advocacy for the war. 

*** Where we stand heading into the weekend: The chairman of the Texas Democratic Party and his wife, also a DNC member and superdelegate, have now endorsed Obama. This brings Obama to a 200-delegate overall lead. Obama is ahead in pledged delegates per the NBC hard count (1,649 to 1,500), Edwards’ pledged delegates (12-0), superdelegates (323.5 to 284.5), overall delegates (1,984.5 to 1,784.5), the popular vote (16,728,123 to 16,294,435), and the total number of contests won (32 to 18). Note: We’re not including Texas in this contest count, given that Clinton won the primary but Obama won the caucus and netted the most total Texas delegates. A bit more on the popular vote... Without adding Florida and Michigan, as noted above, Obama leads by 433,703 votes. Adding Florida to the mix, he leads by 138,931 (17,304,352 to 17,165,421). And adding Michigan but not "uncommitted," Clinton leads by 189,220 (17,493,572 to 17,304,352). But do note that the "uncommitted" vote was 238,168.

*** On the trail: Clinton heads to Puerto Rico, where she holds an early evening rally in Old San Juan; McCain has a media avail in Milwaukee, WI and then raises money in Mill Neck and Woodbury, NY; and Obama is in Montana, where he attends a rally in Great Falls. Also, Bill Clinton stumps in South Dakota.

Countdown to Puerto Rico: 2 days
Countdown to Montana, South Dakota: 4 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 158 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 235 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Anne, PA,
You are so right!!!
LB, Virginia:Also, will someone in the press PLEASE interview all the white, older, feminists who support Obama? I am one and I have a lot of friends. We are all white, over 40, feminist women and we can't stand Hillary and her mob speaking for us. Sorry EJ Dionne, you need to expand your base of voters before you write such stuff! Hillary and her Shrilleries lost this all on their own, and are about to make fools of women tomorrow.

I'm with you all the way!!!  I'm 48, very white and a feminist to boot!  OBAMA all the way.  This older woman will NEVER vote for another Clinton!!

OLDER WOMEN FOR OBAMA, 08
Hillary Clinton will go down in history as the first woman who didn't stop running for President of the United States !
the will of the people is what polisi said the supper delagates should go for well if Hillary has the most popalar votes then thats the will of the people  and they should all vote for her then now she is the nomanee
By Wednesday, this will be over. I think Ferraro's comments were far worse in the Boston Globe than Obama's supposed pastor problem 2. The pastor is white; what he said was a parody, but based on Hillary's behavior.
Therefore, we move on to the general election.
RULES ARE RULES. I don't see where it is fair or democratic to change the rules once the process has started. I am sure that some people of Florida and Michigan are upset that the DNC voided their delegates, but they knew what they were doing before they did it and they choose to do it any way. Game ,set and match.
Greg Anthony , I question a couple of things you state. First off I dont recall hearing that blacks are seperate from the America. What I heard was that they would like a slice of that apple pie. I think you also misunderstand they are not telling people that they are victims they are telling them to stand accountable and not be a victim. Also you said that Obam is (well let me spell it correctly for you)consistantly losing primaries , that is not true either.He one 13 straight then he lost 2 won 2 lost 2 won 1 lost 2 won 1 . If Hillary had not been such a strong candidate with the great name recognition maybe he would have won more. I think that what The Priest said was wrong yet it was right as well.I dont believe that it was this supposed white entitlement, that he claimed but I do believe that it was a sense of entitlement all the same that had Hillary upset that this young man with (little experience)another lie being told is beating her.  It was her's , she is Bill's wife, she was planning a coronation on super tuesday and failed to campaign better at that point. But that priest is not Obama and to try and portray him as such is stupid and childish.I do agree though that I would leave that church at this point.I think he needs to find one closer to DC.
If a teacher goes against school policy, you don't punish the students, you punish the teacher! Why are the voters being punished for what the legislators did by moving the date!

If my vote is cut in half I'll divide my vote also! I voted Dem. in the primary & will vote Rep. in the general! I can live with that, but can the DNC & everyone else live with that!
PA Voter - South Carolina was one of the 4 states (IA, NV, NH and SC) allowed to hold their contest before Feb. 5th.

On Pfleger vs Ferraro - Geraldine Ferraro's Boston Globe attempt to divide the party and appeal to racial fears is much worse than anything a Priest said from a pulpit. Ferraro is purposely trying to stir up tribalism in the general electorate by promoting her ideas in the MSM. The Priest is talking to a single congregation. What he said was disrespectful but not much worse than what Jay Leno says nightly. What Ferraro said sounds like the nativist rantings of a Pat Buchanan with the same intent to divide.
Texas belongs as an Obama victory because pledged delegates, not popular vote, determines who won that state.  Popular vote has been vastly overrated and people need to pay attention to the real measurment of success and that's delegates.

Obama paid attention to this all important measurement and that's why he's winning, because he and his brilliant campaign staff read the rules and played the game by the rules.  They worked hard and smart with the proper strategy, message and financial plan, something the Wicked Witch of the East failed to do.

Go Obama 08/12!
Chuck & Co.-Please at least give a "note" as to the caucus votes.  Those votes are "not being counted" either.  
I'm not so full of an over weaning opinion, that I can't submit to the majority of voters, elected delegates, and super delegates, that are choosing Senator Barack Obama as our democratic nominee, democratically.

Any democrat that won't back our eventual choice, and chooses to cut their ideals adrift out of spite, is a fool, who does not love democracy.
McShame to McClellan...This book SUCKS...

How must royalities will I get for my campaign?

Don't buy this crap until after the election...
or buy one and share to everyone you know...
Greg Anthony... Do tell how he has supported these movements?  Has he had legislation passed in order to force people to give money to them.  Has he presented legislation to recognize Trinity United Church as an entity completely seperate from the United States.

Or has everything he's done as a state senator, a U.S. senator, and presidental candidate the completely opposite of the soundbites that are playing of these pastors.  This guilt by association is really getting old and if the Right thinks this is where the majority of Americans are at they'd better check their polls.
A candidate who cannot get elected is being nominated by a party that cannot be defeated, while a candidate who is eminently electable is running as the nominee of a party doomed to defeat.

Go Clinton.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1083672

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google