ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain: A third Bush term?

Posted: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:22 AM by Domenico Montanaro

So how much like Bush is McCain? The New York Times attempts to answer that question today. "A look at Mr. McCain’s 25-year record in the House and Senate, his 2008 campaign positions and his major speeches over the last three months indicates that on big-ticket issues - the economy, support for continuing the Iraq war, health care - his stances are indeed similar to Mr. Bush’s brand of conservatism. Mr. McCain’s positions are nearly identical to the president’s on abortion and the types of judges he says he would appoint to the courts."

VIDEO: Sen. John McCain shows similarities to President Bush once again, this time on wiretapping. Author John Dean discusses.

More: "The disparities between the two are murkier on other issues. On immigration, Mr. McCain started out with Mr. Bush - at odds with the Republican mainstream - by favoring a path to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants, then backed off and emphasized the border-security-first approach favored by a majority of his party. When it comes to dealing with terrorism suspects, Mr. McCain has supported imposing tighter rules than favored by the administration on the use of harsh interrogation techniques, but has consistently been with the president on limiting the legal rights of Guantánamo detainees… Mr. McCain has reversed himself on some issues - most notably, embracing the Bush tax cuts now after deriding them initially as fiscally risky and excessively skewed to the wealthy - and continues to adjust his positions on others. On Monday, he said he continued to oppose opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, leaving him at odds with the White House and most of his party, but said he favored giving states more flexibility to decide whether to explore for oil off their coasts."

Here are excerpts of the energy speech McCain will deliver in Houston today, in which he calls for lifting the ban on off-shore drilling. “Quite rightly, I believe, we confer a special status on some areas of our country that are best left undisturbed. When America set aside the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, we called it a ‘refuge’ for a reason.  But the stakes are high for our citizens and for our economy. And with gasoline running at more than four bucks a gallon, many do not have the luxury of waiting on the far-off plans of futurists and politicians. We have proven oil reserves of at least 21 billion barrels in the United States. But a broad federal moratorium stands in the way of energy exploration and production. And I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use.” 
 
“We can do this in ways that are consistent with sensible standards of environmental protection. And in states that choose to permit exploration, there must be an appropriate sharing of benefits between federal and state governments. But as a matter of fairness to the American people, and a matter of duty for our government, we must deal with the here and now, and assure affordable fuel for America by increasing domestic production.”

McCain also goes after Obama in his speech, bringing up the Jimmy Carter comparison and hitting him for not supporting a gas-tax holiday. “So what does Sen. Obama support in energy policy? Well, for starters he supported the energy bill of 2005 -- a grab bag of corporate favors that I opposed. And now he supports new taxes on energy producers. He wants a windfall profits tax on oil, to go along with the new taxes he also plans for coal and natural gas. If the plan sounds familiar, it’s because that was President Jimmy Carter’s big idea too -- and a lot of good it did us. Now as then, all a windfall profits tax will accomplish is to increase our dependence on foreign oil, and hinder exactly the kind of domestic exploration and production we need…”
 
“Oddly enough, though, Senator Obama doesn’t want to lower the gas taxes paid by consumers, which would be the most direct and obvious way to give Americans a break at the gas station. Even in tough times for our economy, when folks are struggling to pay for gas and groceries, tax relief just isn’t change he can believe in.”  

DNC spokeswoman Karen Finney pre-buts McCain’s speech with this statement: "The John McCain who talks on the campaign trail about promoting energy independence sounds nothing like the John McCain who has repeatedly voted against responsible efforts to promote renewable energy and is caving in to the oil and gas industry on off-shore drilling… As this campaign goes on, the voters will clearly see that a vote for Sen. McCain is a vote for four more years of the same failed Bush policies that have cost American jobs, driven energy prices through the roof, and given huge handouts to his friends in the oil and gas industry." 

The Washington Post on McCain and off-shore drilling: "The move is aimed at easing voter anger over rising energy prices by freeing states to open vast stretches of the country's coastline to oil exploration. In a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, nearly 80 percent said soaring prices at the pump are causing them financial hardship, the highest in surveys this decade… The senator's push to end the ban is sure to annoy two key Republican allies -- California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Florida Gov. Charlie Crist -- both of whom oppose drilling off their states' coastlines."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Here's a headline for you, McCain:
Carter builds homes for the poor.  Bush makes war to kill American soldiers for oil rights.
Let's stay in Iraq for 100 years, torture the prisoners in Gitmo, and let bin Laden enjoy a long life.  Good, sound GOP foreign policy!
Must
Say
Nothing
Bad about
Candidate Baraka

These people are a bunch of edits.  I am not a McCain support but just can’t stand these ignorant reports.  How do they get paid to report.  God forbid they have a report that is not bias.  God forbid they even say anything negative about Obama.
This is just hilarious.
Trying to paint McCain as Bush clone.
I'll tell you what, let's look at some issues that OBAMA is a clone of Bush.
Comprehensive Immigration Reform
HEY, identical view on that issue. I guess Obama is also a Bush Clone.
WOW I guess Obama and McCain are really just fighting over who's going to "out Bush, Bush".
See how that works?
100 years? As bad as I hate McCain (and I'm an independent Conservative!), he DIDN'T say that and pushing this "100 year" thing is going to backfire.
He didn't say this, then three weeks later backpedal out of it (which is an Obama tactic when he gaffes). In the same breath, he clarified it. Now maybe to Dems, they think this is a brilliant move, but to Main Stream America, this is Buffoonery, Lies, and out and out slander. And you'll see that backfire by November. We don't like this tripe, no matter WHO the Candidate is. The "100 years" is too easy to refute, simply by playing the real clip, taking about 2-3 seconds. A cheap ad.
McCain is an idiot, but he's no Bush clone. This and the "100 years" Obama talking points just show that Obama isn't the "different politician" he claims, but just the same smear artist (and wild eyed Howard Dean is the proponent of this) as the rest of them.
I know that the dems want the White House so bad they'll throw their old white haired grannies under the bus (the May convention proved that), but the American people aren't that stupid, and most importantly, they don't have as much hate in their hearts as I see the Obama supporters have on these blogs. They must really be scared, and in the back of their minds know that The DNC Elites have set up another flawed candidate. Three in a row, isn't it?
"At one time he may have been a maverick, but he is just another GOP fear monger now. "

This too, is funny.

I don't see any difference in Fear Mongering between:
"Terrorists will get you if Obama wins"
And
"Your entitlements will be cut off/reduced if McCain wins".
BOTH are using fear to get the target groups vote.
This is why Politics are taboo subjects in a bar.
Both sides see hypocrisy in the other.
But, in reality, they are the same old hypocrite under the skin.
Like the post before me, I think McCain would have been a good choice for President back in 2000. But I'm not willing to give him a chance in 2008.
The only difference between Bush/McCain is the /.
Bush could have a great plan for ending world hunger and Obamafans would be here saying they would not want any of that because it would be a 3rd term of Bush.  What's wrong with agreeing with someone's good ideas even if you disagree with the bad.  It's not a all or nothing game.  


"try work":

The purpose of people banding together (groups, clubs, tribes, nations) is so that all members can benefit from banding together; benefit for everyone involved and watching each other's backs.
If we are all simply 'on our own,' and the government exists only to perpetuate itself, the reason for forming a government is completely lost.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1148033

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google