ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain talks nuclear, clean coal energy

Posted: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:48 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
SPRINGFIELD, MO -- McCain has made his affinity for nuclear power clear throughout this campaign, but today he got a bit more specific. Continuing his energy week with an event at Missouri State University this afternoon, McCain pledged that as president he would "set this nation on a course to building 45 new reactors by the year 2030, with the ultimate goal of 100 new plants."

VIDEO: Presenting his plan for addressing the nation's energy crisis, Sen. John McCain exposed dramatic difference between himself and Sen. Barack Obama in the energy debate. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.

In a state that relies heavily on coal, McCain also pledged $2 billion annually to research and development of clean coal technology -- something he said was crucial to ending America's dependence on foreign oil.

But in a speech dedicated largely to energy, the presumptive GOP nominee also found time to criticize his opponent for having an energy plan that shows -- according to McCain -- that "the solution to every problem and the answer to every challenge is a new tax."

"For his part, Sen. Obama has a different outlook on all of this," McCain said. "Instead of new energy production, he wants new energy taxes. And he's against any tax relief to give folks a break at the pump. I've noticed a pattern here."

While delivering this pointed attack on Obama's support of a windfall profits tax, McCain was interrupted by a protester who criticized the senator for taking significant amounts of money from big oil companies. Later McCain said, "I don't know what he's talking about."

Some of the most pointed attacks on Obama featured in prepared texts of McCain's speech were omitted from the actual speech itself.

According to the text that was distributed to reporters before the speech, McCain was supposed to criticize Obama for supporting the Bush-Cheney energy bill. "Come to think of it, that energy bill was the only time we've ever seen Senator Obama vote in favor of any tax break -- and it was a tax break for the oil companies," the text said.

On nuclear power, moreover, the prepared text showed that McCain had planned to criticize Obama for remaining relatively agnostic on the issue: "Sen. Obama says, 'I am not a nuclear energy proponent.' I think that makes him a nuclear energy opponent, though he does have a knack for nuance and it's not entirely clear."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

McCain keeps talking about how efficient our nuclear subs have been, but no one has told us what they do with the spent nuclear rods from those subs...  PLEASE don't tell me they just 'dump' them in the oceans...
If you care about the price of oil & the environment you will want to read this congressional report.

http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_americas_energy.pdf
John Mc...
Don't begin to talk about taxes until you tell us who is going to pay off the loans that your idol has borrowed  (at least 1 billion dollars a week) to fight his war in Iraq. John you and your Republican friends have a lot to learn about taxes and the economy. When do you intend to start?
I'm not voting for MCCain but I'm not against nuclear energy. OIL? As a boy I swam in the Texas gulf. Now you come out with globs of oil on your skin and in  your hair. A walk on the beach leaves your feet black. McCain needs to include more than just pronouncements. He needs to say where the nuclear waste is going to go. When he can publically say that he supports his home state Arizona as a storage dump and gets approval, then we can talk energy. Until then, he should be honest and admit that he is all talk.
How refreshing to see someone not afraid of nuclear power. You bring it up and the liberal's/progressives scream: "Danger, Danger Will Robinson!" based on nothing. Here are the facts, the reaction that produces the energy is easily controlled, there is no 'carbon footprint', we have to do something or we will be the dog wagged by the tail of OPEC forever!

Nuclear power is safe and efficient and is a viable alternative. Please note, safe and efficient means that you are cognizant of the laws of physics and follow them ( a concept that many liberals have difficulty with.)

We, as a nation, are between the rock and hard place, we have to find some alternative energy sources. 'Being green', while certaintly nice, is really exorbitant in terms of price (I live on the North Coast and know this from direct experience), drill off our coasts? Yet another viable alternative, however, the enviro-nut wing of the Democrats will have a seizure at the mere suggestion! Of, course none of them are interested in a job on an oil rig, bet you can find some good ol' boys who would 'step up' for the opportunity.

I read endless blather about Obama and his vision of change and the 'audacity of hope'...where is the meat and potatoes? Where is the plan? At least, McCain (who has his faults) is bringing it up, talking about it, letting people know, that 'hey, ya'll wake up and smell the coffee.'

I am not afraid of change, I am really afraid of empty oratory blinding people to the very real mess we have found ourselves in.
Summer gas tax holiday, open up offshore drilling, I think I see a pattern and is called "pandering".  
McCain: a noun, a verb, and "Obama tax" – whether it's true or not. Looks like the GOP will rely heavily on the Big Lie strategy – again. Meanwhile, McCain wants to transfer yet more wealth from our grandchildren (who get stuck with his deficit) to today's wealthy (who get his biggest tax cuts).
More spin from McCain.
Senator Obama has talked several time about clean coal and the necessity to look at nuclear power...at almost every debate!
Does McCain think no one was watching the debates? Or was it HE who was not watching?

OBAMA 08

I am still trying to understand how a "Windfall Profits Tax" will lower the price of gas at the pump.
But what should i expect from Obama when he is told that the last three times the Capital gains tax has been lowered it has increased tax revenue he says its about being Fair. So taxes aren’t about getting the government money its about punishing your citizens fairly.....
HMMMMMMMM something is missing.
It's funny that Mc-Flip-Flop never knows what anybody is talking about when he is challanged.  Does he want us to believe that we are the ones that are confused?  
I have to say that McCain has one good point.  We need more fission reactors.  These new reactors need to be able to handle different types of fuel.  The current reactors only use uranium.  If any one has read a recent issue of Scientific American, one of the authors mentions that we shouldn't bother to reprocess spent fuel.  What McCain (or Obama for that matter) should be talking about is how much they want to spend on research on newer types of fission reactors that can use the reprocessed waste (unspent uranium, plutonuim and other radioactive materials).  The major problem of current fission reactors is the amount of waste the leave.  

Coal is never clean enough for me given how it is mined.  We can try to make coal cleaner, but I think that we need to get it responsibly and not tear down mountains or strip mine areas for coal.  
Oil might be king but coal is still a crown prince, and we have a lot of it. There have been major advancements in clean-burn technology, and with more research there can be more. This is an issue we could all work together on, unfortunately clean-burn cuts into profits.
Money talks real loud and the rest of us suffer.
MSNBC is running an article from the Washington Post "Wall Street fights to protect oil speculation".
McCain talks lifting oil drilling bans on the OCS  now that his campaign donations from the oil industry are over $800,000.  And the oh so principled Florida governor has shown his true colors...NOT!  The pandering War Gnome and the republicant penchant for deregulation make me worry about anything nuclear they propose.  The GOP and McCain have no vision of the future outside gaining power and keeping the wallets of the rich full.
Wow, what no McCain bashing comments yet? Wonder why? Oh, wait, I know, because MCCain may not have the best idea's on Earth, but at least he is offering some kind of help or solution to energy problems, instead of just a vague and general "idea". Obama is still just standing there, with no explanations, and he just keeps saying "change". That being said, I have always said on these blogs, I think Obama would make a fine President, but he really needs to get into detail about his idea's. He offers idea's all the time but doesn't elaborate on them. No one truly has any idea what he stands for or how all of these "changes" are going to take place. I am still not certain who I will vote for. I could go either way, but unless Obama can start explaining to me HOW he is going to bring about all this change I can't see voting for him.........yet. Now if he does start elaborating, and his explanations are good, he just might capture this Independent vote.
And thus, he keeps losing the independent voters who thought he cared about the evironment. One by one.

Here we go with the old bait and switch. The problems with oil have everything to do with transportation, and nothing to do with nuclear power. Nuclear replaces coal...not oil. Now if we were all driving cars with nuclear reactors, perhaps McCain would be making some sense. Each time I hear politicians taqlking about nuclear, or wind, or solar, to reduce our oil usage, I just want to scream, and you would think that the media would hold them accountable for these obvious distortions.
I wouldn't be interested in any plan until the Enron loophole is fixed and any other loopholes that allow speculation on the market of oil.  Let's hear what McCain has to say about this issue, or does he not remember?

I do believe that Mr. McCain is duping the American public. He knows about the loopholes and hasn't proposed to close them.  Haven't we already  had a president that duped us?  

Obama08
McCain, he's really "Snowflake" the mascot of the Dolphins.  flip-flop, flip-flop!
That is really tough talk....watch the price of oil go up even more...

What a moron...threats just seem to follow this guy like an old suit....

We don't use oil for electrical production...
mostly autos and home heating..
Coal plays right into the West Virginia vote,
nuclear plays right into the nation waste management vote..Nevada...
Two Muslim women at Barack Obama's rally in Detroit Monday were barred from sitting behind the podium by campaign volunteers seeking to prevent the women's headscarves from appearing in photographs or on television with the candidate
“I was coming to support him, and I felt like I was discriminated against by the very person who was supposed to be bringing this change, who I could really relate to,” said Hebba Aref, a 25-year-old lawyer who lives in the Detroit suburb of Bloomfield Hills.

WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO WILL BOLDY & AGGRESSIVELY DEAL WITH THIS CRSIS:

1.)  DRILL for oil everywhere it is available on USA lands and waters, on a expedited basis;

2.)  Provide FINANCIAL REWARDS for the development and implementation of cost-effective and/or renewable energy sources;

3.)  BUILD nuclear power plants, on an expedited basis, to provide for at least 80% of our electric power needs.

WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO WILL USE THE 'BULLY PULPIT' AND PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE POWERS TO ATTACK THIS CRISIS AS IF THE COST OF FOREIGN OIL WERE AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES..  BECAUSE IT IS --- AN ECONOMIC WAR.
"For his part, Sen. Obama has a different outlook on all of this," McCain said. "Instead of new energy production, he wants new energy taxes. And he's against any tax relief to give folks a break at the pump. I've noticed a pattern here."

new energy production=drilling for more oil instead of solving the problem.

And he's against any tax relief=a rediculous gas-tax "Holiday"

"I've noticed a pattern here."

Really, McCain? You noticed a pattern? great job.

The American people have noticed a pattern too, John. You and your party have become corrupted by a corporate agenda and have turned a blind eye to the Constitution and the needs of everyday American Citizens. Workers, Women, Students, et al. Ya, real clever John...the indies are not impressed.


Jay
Blue-Blooded Dem
Bush made the same promises when he ran and he's had 7 1/2 years to fulfill all those promises and not ONE plant has been built for clean coal technology. It's beginnning to get difficult to see where the policies of Bush end and McCain's begin. And continuing to paint Obama as a tax and spend liberal is ridiculous and shows you out of touch the GOP truly is; it's the only thing they can throw at him and it's not going to work this year!
More republican lies. What about the over 12 billion a month in Irac. Oh that's right just have the middle class and poor pay for it. A weakened dollar every day while being in a tremendous deficit is what Mccain will continue. Your 2 billion annual commitment to clean coal technology sonds like more pandering. I smell it.
As a boy I swam in the Texas gulf. Now you come out with globs of oil on your skin and in  your hair. A walk on the beach leaves your feet black"

mexed, san antonio, texas

-------------------------
thanks for that info Mexed...

Ya this is what I want...Thanks big Mac and McCrist.

Sorry, but I would rather us invest and research some new fuels/sources than ruin the gulf that I want to take my future kids fishing/swimming in.

Clearwater used to have Clear-Water. McBush and McCrist, please do not ruin our coastlines.
"I wouldn't be interested in any plan until the Enron loophole is fixed..."
McCain is duping America (Sent Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:43 AM)

AMEN!  If you all haven't see Keith's report on this, I recommend you do.  Another gift from the rethuglicans - although I do wonder why Clinton didn't overturn it...
To: Adam, St. Louis (Sent Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:35 AM)

Please go to his website and do just the minimum amount of research. All of your questions about details on all of his policies will be answered. Very satisfactorily I might add.

Go Obama!
[What about the over 12 billion a month in Irac]

Here we see the level of understanding of the world by a typical Obama supporter. If you asked this genius where 'Irac' was, don't be surprised when he/she points to Minnesota.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1153793

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google