ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



McCain vs. Obama: The energy debate

Posted: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:11 AM by Domenico Montanaro

A New York Times analysis examines the debate over lifting the ban on off-shore oil drilling. “Whether $4-a-gallon gasoline is producing more support for domestic drilling is hard to discern. A Gallup poll conducted last month found that 57 percent of those surveyed favored drilling for oil in coastal and wilderness areas that are now off limits, but there are no earlier data for comparison. In March, before the latest spike in gasoline prices, a Pew Research Center survey found that 50 percent opposed drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, in Alaska, while 42 percent were in favor.”

VIDEO: As gasoline and other fuel prices continue to rise, Barack Obama and John McCain are sparring over energy plans, including proposals for offshore drilling. NBC's David gregory reports.

More: “The federal Energy Information Administration estimates that 18 billion barrels of oil are in the area covered by the moratorium, and the White House says that is enough to match current American production for 10 years. But a 2007 analysis by the agency concluded that opening up drilling in the moratorium area ‘would not have a significant impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030.’” 

Politico writes that Bush and McCain “have given Republicans new ammunition in the war of words over $4-per-gallon gasoline, but their calls to lift a ban on offshore oil drilling are unlikely to break the political stalemate in Congress. The House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday postponed a previously scheduled vote on Pennsylvania Rep. John E. Peterson’s proposal to lift the ban — perhaps a sign that the double-barreled push from the GOP’s leaders has left Democrats worried that the proposal isn’t the automatic loser it has been in the past. “

”But Democrats still control both the House and the Senate, and the party in power shows little interest in expanding production to confront skyrocketing gas prices — especially if doing so puts it at odds with voters concerned about the environment.” 

Veepstakes watch on this issue, per NBC/NJ’s Mike Memoli:
Off message? Jim Webb is co-sponsoring John Warner’s offshore drilling bill. 

Mark Sanford “reiterated his conditional opposition” to offshore drilling.

And Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) released a statement supporting Bush and McCain on drilling.

This energy debate has even become an issue in the Warner-Gilmore Senate race in Virginia, the Washington Post reports.

Also on the energy front: "McCain called yesterday for the construction of 45 nuclear reactors by 2030 and pledged $2 billion a year in federal funds 'to make clean coal a reality,' measures designed to reduce the United States' dependence on foreign oil."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

MSNBC is running an article from the Washington Post "Wall Street fights to protect oil speculation".
Well, well.
there's all kinds of obama reversals today.
How come Obama's changing positions are painted as heady and well-thought out and pragmatic, while McCain is labeled a flip-flopper?

this dude is going to change colors once in the White House and we will all be sorry if he is elected.

McCain '08
Sorry, what's the debate?  McCain will continue Bush's energy policy, which is shipping billions of dollars each month to the middle east.  That's making us safer how?  What's the debate?
Now poised to become the issue of the campaign, and perhaps McCain's best chance to win.

The dichotomy could be start drilling now (actually in about two years at the earliest) as well as building additional refineries now (having more crude doesn't help if you can't process it) so as to have more domestic production in 5-10 years versus start transitioning to alternatives now.

Because the transition to alternatives is new and thus scary, McCain could win over enough independents to pull this off.

A side issue will be whether to build nuclear reactors or not. McCain staked out his position. Obama I suspect already was there - at least he didn't take past opportunities to denounce the idea of building new reactors.
Ah, yes, another play out of the Karl Rove book on how to dupe the voters to voting for the idiot.

First, there's the destruction of the environment.

Second, there's the fact that this oil won't do anything for gas prices for another several years, and nothing at anytime without building additional oil refineries...which nobody wants in their backyard.

Third, there's the fact that today's high oil prices are not the result of production or supply, but the Enron loophole and unregulated oil speculators artificially driving up the price of oil.

Fourth, there's the fact that we are in a global warming climate crisis, and the answer to our energy problems is not to pump out more oil from the ground and pump more CO2's into the air.

Fifth, there's the fact that this oil policy is a total flip flop.

Sixth, there's the fact that this oil policy is coming from the only US president to lose money in the oil business.

and...

Seventh...if its a recommendation from the Bush administration, it must be a bad one.

Obama's resistance to destroying the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge, and our seashores, demonstrates his better judgment in this area.  Instead of desimating our environment, the real answer lies in renewable energy.

Bush and McCain are just simple idiots.
Off-shore drilling is not a viable solution to the current problem. The American people will see NO GAIN or cut in GAS PRICES from the drilling.

If you want gas prices cut, go see the people on Wall St., they are why gas is $4 per gallon.
And in whose back yard are these reactors going to be built?  

And where are the spent nuclear rods going to be dumped?  

Where are we currently dumping the spent rods from all the nuclear submarines?  

Let's not get the cart in front of the horse - AGAIN.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1154211

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google