ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: A focus group in York

Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:16 AM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
YORK, PA -- A focus group conducted last night here in a county that Hillary Clinton carried in April showed that her supporters are coming around to Obama. But the group -- 12 likely voters, all white, and all of whom didn't back either Obama or McCain in the primary -- also demonstrated that both candidates have plenty of work to do between now and November. The good news for Obama: Of the seven Clinton supporters, all of whom backed her strongly, five were solidly behind the Illinois senator, one was fiercely opposed (“I don’t trust Obama,” he said), and one was undecided (but noted that Clinton's support of Obama would influence her vote). The bad news: On some questions of character, patriotism, and values (who would you rather carry the American flag at the Olympics, who would you rather carpool with), the focus group overwhelmingly picked McCain. While Jeremiah Wright barely came up and “bitter” didn’t at all, two of the respondents -- the Clinton supporter and a female Bush voter -- had very negative opinions of him. “I don’t trust Osama … Obama. It’s only a letter difference,” said Charles, the Hillary backer. “His middle name is Hussein.” Observed Terry, the female Bush voter: “I don’t feel he’s a true American.”

*** Views of Obama: Overall, however, Obama fared pretty well in this focus group, which was striking given that it was all white, that not a single person voted for him in the primary, and that it took place in a region not considered a strength for him. Five said they would vote for him, four backed McCain, and three said they were undecided. Democratic pollster Peter Hart, who conducted the focus group for the Annenberg School at the University of Pennsylvania, said Obama benefited from a room wanting change and to move beyond Bush. What skeptics were looking for, he added, was some “meat on the bone.” The five who said they would vote for him cited his fresh ideas, intelligence, grasp of the issues, and excitement and energy. The four who opposed him -- all Bush voters, save Charles, the Hillary supporter -- stressed his inexperience and their fears of him being commander-in-chief. And of the three who were undecided, one said they wanted to know more about his health-care plans; another wanted to know more about the kind of change he would bring; and the third said she was considering Obama because of change.

VIDEO: Barack Obama and John McCain are in a war of words over debates, campaign finance and remarks by advisers. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports on the latest in the presidential campaign.

*** Views of McCain: As for McCain, many of the focus group participants cited his experience, his POW past, and his love of the country. But it was noteworthy that of the three undecideds, all of them voted for Bush in 2004 -- but they were unwilling to announce their support for McCain. One of them, Kim, expressed concern about the Arizona senator’s age. Another, Janell, even recalled him saying at a GOP debate that the economy wasn’t in that bad of shape, and she said that McCain must chose a running mate “I have absolute confidence in” to win her vote. Hart said the fact that a GOP voter like Janell wasn’t supporting McCain right now was telling. “If [she] isn’t a locked-in vote for John McCain, that is bad news.” What’s more, except for only the strongest Republicans in the group, the opinions of President Bush were unflattering. “Ineffective,” “deceptive,” and “disgusted” were some of the words they said to describe him. Also in the focus group, the economy was the top concern (only one said Iraq), and all of them were critical of the way the media have covered the presidential contest. We’ll have more about the focus group later today.

*** Bill's beefs with Obama: The budding rivalry between Bill Clinton and Obama is coming into clearer focus thanks to a VERY tepid supporting statement yesterday from Bill Clinton about Obama. It's been no secret in Clinton circles that the FPOTUS took the primary campaign personally, particularly on two fronts: 1) the fact that Obama was so quick to pooh-pooh the '90s and 2) the way he believes the Obama campaign turned him into a racist. While Hillary Clinton is very pragmatic about what she needs to do in this campaign now regarding Obama, Bill's just not there yet. That said, one Bill confidante recently said to us that the former president still loves to heal rifts, that he thrives on it, and that at some point he'll go on his own Obama charm offensive so that suddenly the Democratic nominee finds himself so smitten that he begins begging 42 to start campaigning for him. But when will Bill Clinton's seduction of Obama begin? Will it be in time for the convention so that Bill gets his speaking slot? Or will he be reduced to tribute video status while Hillary Clinton gets the Monday prime time slot?

*** When Juan Valdez meets Pablo Escobar: Per NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy, McCain will travel to Colombia next week. The purpose of the trip, the campaign says, is because the country “is a vital ally in our struggle against the scourge of drugs." But it also goes beyond that:  Ever since the issue of NAFTA became a hot-button issue in the Democratic primary, McCain has been going out of his way to emphasize his own free-trade credentials. This includes several weeks of advocating the Colombia Free Trade Agreement, as well as last week's trip to Canada, where McCain refused to mention his opponent by name but said that Americans have "to defend [NAFTA] without equivocation in political debate." Aigner-Treworgy adds that next week's trip -- McCain will also stop in Mexico -- serves to make McCain look presidential (meeting with foreign leaders whom he calls "friends") and also provides him a forum in which he can promote his position on free trade while appearing to be above the back-and-forth partisan name-calling that takes place stateside.

*** Another incumbent bites the dust: After surviving past GOP primary challenges -- all focused on his support for comprehensive immigration reform -- Utah Rep. Chris Cannon (R) finally lost. He was defeated by challenger Jason Chaffetz, who served as Gov. Jon Huntsman’s chief of staff and also was a placekicker for BYU. Cannon becomes the third congressional incumbent this cycle (Democrat Al Wynn and Republican Wayne Gilchrist were the others) to lose a primary challenge. All the attention the presidential contest has received has buried this point, but it’s an important one to stress after yesterday’s news: The country isn’t happy with the US Congress. Indeed, just 13% in the latest NBC/WSJ poll -- an all-time low -- said they approved of the job it’s doing. No wonder the most strident activists are so eager to kick out incumbents.

*** On the trail: McCain is in Nevada, giving an energy speech and raising money in Las Vegas and then opening a campaign office in Henderson. Obama is in Chicago, where he holds a media avail in the afternoon.

Countdown to Dem convention: 61 days
Countdown to GOP convention: 68 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 132 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 209 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I won't vote for obama - has nothing to do with his name - or - race - he is NOT qualified to lead our country.  Is McCain - don't know - BUT - we have to vote for a new President and I am not sure yet - but I do know I will never vote party - only the BEST person qualified.
For the people who will not vote Obama and will cross the line, you sound like you must have been some spoiled kid. The terrible thing is that when you did not get your way, you went away with your arms cross. You all were never really Democrats; you just had a hidden agenda. If Hillary would have won, we would have supported her. So here's my recommendation, cross your arms and just go away!!!
I'm not at all surprised by the comments made by the focus group from York County.  As anyone from Central PA knows, York County is a haven for racism, and has for a long time had a strong presence from the KKK.  I graduated college in 2002, at a campus not far from York County.  I can remember seeing flyers and leaflets being dropped on the campus occasionally, from groups connected with KKK in York County.  And this was 2002!  So this isn't surprising.  
Why is McCain spending so much time OUT of the country these days?  Because he can't win votes at home, maybe he can at least win some praise from other countries?  Perhaps he saw the international 'polls' that felt Obama would be a stronger leader in the US than McBush...

Is he running for POTUS or POTWorld...

It will be nice when school starts again...  I swear, half the 'posters' on the blogs seem to be 13.
Why isn't Obama a true American? Because his name is Barack and not Bob!!! That is the stupidist thing I have ever heard.  What a bunch of ignorant people they found to participate!!!!
I'll admit, I was fearful of the man with such a different name.  Time is warming me to it.  After all, he did not choose his name, it was given to him.  His name does not define his character, or his values, he does.  I am listening carefully to all sides and trying to know this man and give him a fair look. He should not be judged by his name, but by who he is.
People come on!  Don't support the two -party system if you don't like what the candidate represents!  Americans have to be the one to show our government that there are other options! Because the mainstream media purposely neglects to mention them and the fact that you are being manipulated to vote "either or" should make you mad!  Please check out Chuck Baldwin in the Constitution Party, Bob Barr in the Libertarian Party and Ralph Nader.  Even if one of them doesn't win, the more votes they get will show that other parties are becoming a force to be reckoned with.  If you're adamantly against the Iraq War, check the others out.  If you believe our Congress has gotten WAY out of control, the other two are FAR better than what the media is shoving on us.  Right now, our government is circumventing the rule of law, our Constitution, that guarantees Americans have individual rights and freedoms.  "We the People" are in charge; not them.  Let's send them a message!  If you're worried about "wasting" a vote, don't worry.  McCain wants to continue war.  Obama wants to move troops to Afghanistan (not out of the Middle East and is threatening Iran too). Let's not get sidetracked by third world nations 6,000 miles away while neglecting our own borders and economy!  If our leaders don't stop catering to lobbyists and corporate interests/spending money like we have it (we're borrowing from foreign nations folks!), we are rapidly approaching an economic crisis!  My suggestion is look to whichever candidate will give solid plans to work on our economy first and foremost!  Everything else affects it and it will affect us personally!  Good luck Americans!  
A lot of sound and fuzzy signifying nothing is what sums up Barack Obama. He's indecisive when it comes to jettisoning "friends" like Jeremiah Wright, he's hypocritical in his treatment of the American Muslim community, his principal campaign strategist is senior partner in a firm that, ahem, lobbies for the nuclear industry in Illinois, and the list goes on.

McCain won't get my vote in November. But neither will Obama, who isn't at all the "agent of change" that adoring supporters and media have made him out to be.  
I'm a liberal, but wouldn't it be fun if all the Clintonistas voted for, and elected, McCain who would appoint the Supreme Court justices who, when confirmed by the cowardly Democratic-controlled Congress, would overturn Roe v. Wade?  

My only comment regarding the Clintonistas who would vote for McCain is nuttier than a squirrel's cheeks in October.

GET OVER IT!  HILLARY LOST, and she lost because she couldn't sell four more years of her serial adulterer husband to enough Democratic voters which indicates there's some hope for the Demorcatic Party.

June 24, 2008
Gallup Daily: Obama Holds Slight Edge, 46% vs. 43%,

Still anyones win, no clear leader yet.

McCain/08
Mark, It's a fair point, but I'm not sure it's an entirely right-headed one. I mean, yeah, he needs to win over some people if he wants to get EVERYBODY'S vote. But all he needs to win is 50%+1 of the electoral votes.  If he can do that, he's the president, plain and simple. Now, that may not be a sexy way to win the way it was back in 2000 (since I think a lot of people are kind of hoping for a seismic shift that would necessitate a landslide victory for either candidate), but it's a win nevertheless. And if we're going to rely on polling data the way we should (with the known caveat that it's simply a snapshot of a specific time and place), we can see that, at least in the early goings-on, it's not even a contest, especially if you ignore "national" polling data and instead focus on state-by-state data. As we know, a close popular vote race could still result in a landslide for either candidate.
Rich if you think McCain will represent stability then you aren't looking beyond this year at all. To spell it out for you, a McCain administration would result in political turmoil btw GOP and Dems, a constant threat of war with Iran, the continued lack of resources for troops in Afghanastan, more favors for big oil with no puase in rising gas prices, no responsive economic action from a McCain administration content with Bush's current policy. This image of McCain you have in your head is not based on reality. It's rather astounding anyone claiming to vote Clinton would display such a lack of understanding of the candidates. As you have witnessed Congress is often ineffectual for guiding this country..it resides in the POTUS and their administration to send us in the proper direction.
I was planning on running for office this year - any office, because, you know, we need a change.  Then it was pointed out to me that the typical voter would note my first name (Timothy) and the ethnicity of my last name (Irish) and would automatically connect me to Timothy McVeigh.  We all know this makes me someone with a penchant for blowing up buildings on Hitlers birthday, so I have no chance.
I am so happy that most "true Americans" know better than to vote for someone as subversive as me.
Some of the best con artists are very articulate and give great motivational speaches, but they have no clue how to do things. They are given a script and present the script just like any actor in Hollywood.

This is what Obama does, it scares me how many people actualy think that he has a clue. Obama is just a prop, a puppet on a string so to speak. If you think the economy is bad know just wait for the liberal left to pull Oboma's strings and people will curse the day that Obama is in the position he is now!
Rich:

Fine. Vote instead for the candidate who wants to continue the policies that left us "an already fragile nation. See how that works out.
I'm a Hillary supporter in Wisconsin who will not back Obama.  My family is primarily democratic, and 8 of us strongly backed Hillary and all 8 of us will NOT be voting in November.  We just cannot vote for Obama.  We don't trust him, we don't think he has enough experience and we plain old don't like him.
Attn Rich in Austin....If you were a Hillary supporter why not stay that way?  I supported her in the primary of my state and I will be voting for her in November.  She is still the best qualified and, as we know, she'll be ready on day one.  If it's not about party loyality, vote your convictions!
Anne, PA,

Get over yourself.

You are NOT that important.

I am sure you would vote for Bush if he could run for a 3rd term anyway (in many ways he IS).
Obama's name aside, I think he is the NEXT Bill Clinton if he is voted into office. He's a smooth talker with no plan and no experience. Hell, if he's lucky he might have time to squeeze in a couple blow jobs in the oval office, on my tax dollar time if elected!
I'm so disgusted on how i hear people say they'll vote for mccain because he seems "more American" or "patriotic" now why's this? ---because they're white and he's white!!! SORRY people that's just racism in disguise...when are these people finally gonna see people for what they can bring to the table and not the color of their skin, or last name etc...  we need to remember that America would not be America without all it's diverse ethinicities and their contributions to this nation!!!
Obama is the "NO" canidate.

No to offshore drilling.
No to drilling in ANWAR.
No to drilling anywhere.
No to Nuclear Power Plants (France has 80% of it's energy supplied by Nuclear Power (and they consider the greatest econmic decision they ever made).

Yes to raising Social Security taxes
Yes to raising income taxes
Yes to a Payroll Tax

Recent discoveries have found we have more OIL in the United States then ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

Advances in techology allow us to drill in a small area (used to be the state of Rhode Island) Today it is the size of an airport. In ANWAR they would drill in a an area 1/10 or 1% the size of ANWAR.

OPEC is scared to death we will start drilling.

We should drill and at the same time invest in alternative sources of fuel. Just the announcement that we will begin drilling will send prices down and the reserves we have could be used in anticipation of the oil to come.

Obama's answer is a Windfall Tax on Oil Companies.

What!! Who do you think is going to pay for that windfall tax? YOU AND ME. His ideas will not put a single gallon of gas in your tank at a cheaper price.

It will riase the Price.

Does anyone except those who know Economics realize this?
To Hillary Supporters Against Obama: As an Illinoisian, I would be happy to tell you more about
Obama's three terms as a state senator. Inexperienced?
The same was said of JFK: During the Cuban Missile Crisis, he resisted pressure from the Joint Chiefs and
the CIA to attack Cuba. We now know that those missile
silos weren't being built, but rather were complete and fully armed. Had it not been for that "inexperience" president, we wouldn't be here to have this discussion. Senator Obama had the courage, intelligence and common sense to be against the invasion of Iraq when it was not a popular stance and
was politically dangerous. Yet the reasons he gave then have been proven true: Osama bin Laden is free,
the military is stretched thin, our debt is outrageous, our infrastructure decaying, and we have a
POTUS who believes the Constitution is a "(explitive
deleted) piece of paper." Obama is a professor of
just that: Voting for 4 more years of the same. If disgruntled Hillary suppoters are so bitter that they
would put their personal feelings before the welfare of America, then their lives will be very rocky. As the Stones sang, "You can't always get what you want,
but if you try sometimes you just might find...You get
what you need."                     SI for Obama
A wise person, overhearing a conversation with a lot of back stabing, inuendos and false statements, told the people "don't poisen the water, soon no one will drink it". This is where this whole 'blog?' is going. Why would I listen to a person who cann't understand that someone could ligitametly be concerned with Sen. Obama's lack of experiance. He has a great message but I don't think he is going to ask any long term Dems to step down so true change can take place. Congress has a rating just about as low as the President.
Why cann't some people understand that Sen. Obama is a motivating speaker and may be able to get people to stop thinking just about themselves and start doing something for their country and fellow citizens as well as our children.
Most of you are just blind to the thoughts and concernes of other people. You deride anyone who doesn't think just like you and you could never explain the other persons point of view, that is sad.
We need to have understanding in this country and few people here show any inclination to try it.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1166068

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google