ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain's Lexington Project

Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:35 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy
LAS VEGAS, NV -- While wrapping up the west coast swing of his two-week energy tour, McCain gave something of a closing argument today, summarizing the proposals of the last 10 days and giving them a new name: “The Lexington Project.”

“In recent days, I have set before the American people an energy plan, the Lexington -- the Lexington Project, the Lexington Project -- remember that name,” McCain said. “Named for the town where Americans asserted their independence once before. And let it begin today with this commitment: In a world of hostile and unstable suppliers of oil, this nation will achieve strategic independence by the year 2025.”

According to McCain spokesperson Brian Rogers, “strategic independence” is when “oil is no longer the primary fuel for transportation, and when the oil cartel no longer has the ability to undermine our economy or the paychecks of the American worker.”

The parts of this project as outlined during this tour are at least seven fold. Since last Monday, McCain has proposed lifting the moratorium on offshore oil exploration; putting the country on a path to build 45 new nuclear plants by 2030; cracking down on speculation in the oil futures market; committing $2 billion dollars per year to clean coal research; a $300 million prize for the first company that can create a zero-emissions automobile battery; and a $5,000 consumer tax credit for the purchase of any zero-emissions vehicles. All of this is in addition to the cap-and-trade system he has proposed as a senator.

McCain mostly avoided criticizing his opponent this morning, only lashing out at “opponents of domestic production” -- a label he has previously said applies to Obama.

“Opponents of domestic production cling to their position, even as the price of foreign oil has doubled and doubled again,” he said. “They were against it when a gallon of gas cost $2. They’re still against it when a gallon of gas cost well over $4. And we're left to wonder what it will take to shake their faith in this dogma of dependence on foreign oil.”

But the McCain campaign was not so shy this morning during one of their oh-so-common conference calls, during which Sen. Jon Kyl referred to Obama as "Dr. No" and said Obama has opposed numerous proposals to confront the energy crisis.

"It’s a very negative approach that basically says there are no answers to the hurt Americans are suffering right now," Kyl said.

*** UPDATE *** Here's the response from the DNC: “Apparently John McCain’s idea of ‘straight talk’ means not talking at all about his plan to bring more nuclear waste but fewer jobs to Nevada. During his 25 years in Congress, Sen. McCain has been a part of America’s energy problem by repeatedly voting against the kind of incentives that would create green jobs in Nevada and communities across the country. America’s working families deserve new energy ideas, not more of the same failed policies that have cost us jobs, driven energy prices through the roof, and done nothing to make America less dependent on foreign oil.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Wow, a candidate with a plan.  Where's Obama's plan, or are we just going to shout 'yes we can' at the gas pump until the price goes down?
John McCain - is full of BS...he will say anything to get elected.

Now he has all of these ideas ...you mean 30 years in the senate and you couldn't think of anything until NOW...PLEASE THE GOP STILL THINK WE ARE STUPID.

Just like George Bush did...and look what happened.

John McCain is just another George Bush and he's Republican - so you know he can't be trusted.

Thank you and GOD BLESS AMERICA
Latest Presidential polls by state, including the resulting electoral votes:

http://www.presidentpolls2008.com/
How about the McExxon Project!
None of these options gives America any kind of fiscal responsibility short term or a solution short term that can help our wallets or help us at the pump.
Well played Senator Mccain.  Keep trying to look like you care.  In the meantime America seriously does not think opening new areas for possible oil drilling actually will get the oil companies to drill.  They have plenty of unused area to use currently yet they don't.  gee... I wonder why.  Why would they want to.  They are making record profits off of us and you obviously don't care since you aren't hurting.
Ah yes the place Americans bled and died (mine included)to make America free only to have McCain and his buddies in congress pass laws to revoke those freedoms,then you listen to the rattle heads on the blogs proclaim what a great hero he is to bad they never studied their history......
"It’s a very negative approach that basically says there are no answers to the hurt Americans are suffering right now."

Wrong again, Senator Kyl.  It's a realistic approach that acknowledges that there are no easy answers to ease American's economic suffering.

When you consider the fact that we consume over a quarter of the world's oil supplies and produce less than three percent, and combine this with the reality that the most generous estimates of the oil available from coastal drilling is a mere drop in the bucket, you can begin to see that the term "domestic oil production" is more of an oxymoron than an energy strategy.


Well, I live in California, and the last thing I want, or anyone else in my state wants, is drilling off of our shoreline.  Poor McCain, he's so confused as usual, we not only need to get off of our dependence on foreign oil; we need to get off of our dependence
on ANY oil.  It's so funny that getting away from oil dependence was strictly a Democratic argument until gas went up to $4.50 a gallon, then the Repukelicans jump on board.  He is the biggest sham that they've ever put forward as a candidate.  He is riding the same wave that Bush rode for the last 8 years.  I will give him credit for one thing, at least he believes in global warming!  That's one small step for that party.  

Did you see the protesters outside of his press conference in Santa Barbara?  He's got to be kidding.  Not only would it take 10 years to produce any oil from these rigs, it puts all of our coastlines at risk from oil spills.  Additionally, I have read that even after 10 years of drilling, the amount of oil they could extract would probably only power our nation for about a week!  Not worth the risk!!
Can McCain explain why he voted against the Reduction of Dependence on Foreign Oil amendment in 2005 that would have required the US to reduce this dependence to 40% by 2025.  He also was one of 12 senators that voted against the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which would increase funding for renewable energy sources.

Oh Laura dear from Norfolk. All you have to do is go to Obama's web if you "really" want to see an actual plan. Funny, never heard McBush ever talk about closing speculation loopholes before. Oh yeah, Mr and Mrs Graham wouldn't have cared much for that.
Where have these ideas been for the last 26 years Mr. McCain?  Seems that if you're the change agent you claim to be that you should have accomplished a whole heck of a lot more than you can actually lay claim to.  I don't buy your hooey - you've changed your positions like you change your socks.  Who knows what you actually believe any more!  I can't vote for anyone that has no principles or convictions, and you, Mr. McCain have neither.  Did the folks from the oil industry write your energy plan too?  I wouldn't doubt it.
Isn't it interesting that McFossil has been in the Senate for 20 YEARS and has done NOTHING about energy until now?????????? Hmmmmmmmmmmm. Guess we're just stupid not to vote for this genius. Call me stupid. Obama '08!
John you will be 90 in 2025....zzzzzzzzzzzzzz......
So do understand this correctly? Senator McCain's proposals this week give a total funding commitment for alternative fuels in the amount of a $300m prize for someone developing a new battery?  That is really thinking big.
Guy Caruso, who heads the federal Energy Information Administration, said consumers would see little savings at the pump from off shore drilling.

"It would be a relatively small effect, because it would take such a long time to bring those supplies on," Caruso said during a briefing at the Center for Strategic and International Studies on the EIA's new long-term international energy forecast. "It doesn't affect prices that much."

Most energy experts say it would take five to 10 years to find oil in the closed areas and bring the crude to market. Caruso said the additional supplies would amount to only a couple of hundred thousand barrels of oil a day.

"It does take a long time to develop these resources, and therefore the price impact is muted by that," he said.
Guy Caruso, who heads the federal Energy Information Administration, said consumers would see little savings at the pump from off shore drilling.

"It would be a relatively small effect, because it would take such a long time to bring those supplies on," Caruso said during a briefing at the Center for Strategic and International Studies on the EIA's new long-term international energy forecast. "It doesn't affect prices that much."

Most energy experts say it would take five to 10 years to find oil in the closed areas and bring the crude to market. Caruso said the additional supplies would amount to only a couple of hundred thousand barrels of oil a day.

"It does take a long time to develop these resources, and therefore the price impact is muted by that," he said.
Laura...

If you ever listened to Obama talk... like you did Bush for the past 8 years, you'd know what his economic proposals are.  He's interested in keeping jobs here in the US... he intends to tax companies that choose to go abroad and reward those that stay here.    

He intends on getting us into alternative fuels like, Corn/Switchgrass ethanol burning vehicles.  How would be pay for it... by ending the enrron loophole created by one of McCain's campaign talking heads, Phil Gramm.  He'd also use some of the 12billion spent per month in IRAQ.  

Your candidate talks about building all these nuclear facilities, but doesn't have a clue where he'd store the waste... how about on your front lawn!!
Lexington Project!!

remember that name?  No McForget.. you remember it so you don't talk against it in two weeks
20 years in Washington and he is just now putting forth an Energy Plan. What took so long? Doesn't he know that it is the Congress that would have to approve such a plan. Why only now? If you could not get anything done in 20 years in Congress how can you expect the people to believe you will get it done in 4 years as President?
I don't understand how being a POW makes someone an expert on war, or foreign policy.  McCain had a horrible service record.  When has he had any experience in managing troops, or planning strategy?  With all his "misspeaks" and spouting erroneous facts, how will he deal effectively with foreign leaders?  He'll be more of an embarrassment than GW.
Energy independence by 2025 - and you'll be what, 102?  McFossilFuel!
Laura- pay attention.  Obama has a plan and has long ago introduced it.  Some of John's 7 points have long been part of the Obama plans, a few are just panders (and secret bonuses to big business)
Wait, wasn't McThuselah at the ORIGINAL Lexinton when we declared our independence?
As a 110% supporter of Hillary's "Insourcing for the 21st Century", I have read J-Mac's VERY SPECIFIC "The Lexington Project" and his policy combines sound energy and environmental policies to create jobs, jobs and more green-collar jobs!

I have forwarded The Lexington Project to all my undecided friends and former Hillary supporters!!

Way to go J-Mac!

Visionary!!

–rd84
Laura, BushII had a plan 7 1/2 years ago, look how that turned out. Lie to get us into Iraq, displaying disregard for our constitution, denying that his buddies in the oil companies have in any way have anything to do with our skyrocketing gas prices. Has he ever mentioned anything recently that Americans can believe in? Now, you seem satisfied that Bush 3 "has a plan"!  
It may not help us now but thats what they said ten years ago. I know you cant see ten years into the future but since we cant we should do absolutly everything now to make sure we're ready. I think we should do it all and not refuse to do something because it won't help right now.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1168275

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google