ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



EMILY'S List's influence waning?

Posted: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:27 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
National Journal’s Bara Vaida and Jennifer Skalka have the cover story of this month’s magazine on Ellen Malcolm and Emily’s List. (Kirk Victor also has a piece worth noting in the magazine called "Disbanded Brothers" about the "frayed, if not severed" ties that Kerry and Hagel "once had to John McCain." More after the jump.)

VIDEO: Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., who is with a group of ten women Democratic senators attempting to prevent Hillary Clinton supporters from voting for John McCain, talks with MSNBC's Contessa Brewers.

Vaida and Skalka write: “Although EMILY's List is not to blame for Clinton's narrow loss to Barack Obama, the group had a lot riding on her candidacy--politically and psychologically. Her defeat calls into question the very core of EMILY's List's strategy--that women will back female candidates in the interest of equality, and that gender and identity politics can trump issues, message, and personality. Clinton's failure, in many ways, is also a reflection of the divide between Baby Boomer women (the foundation of EMILY's List) and their daughters, who, according to exit poll data, came out in force in the primaries for Obama. Among women age 29 and younger, Obama routinely defeated Clinton in key primary states, even in contests that Clinton won, while Clinton overwhelmingly beat Obama among women age 45 and older.

“Clinton's fall from front-runner to runner-up capped a challenging few years for EMILY's List, which pioneered the use of direct mail and donor bundling to raise early money for Democratic women candidates. In the 2006 election, Democrats triumphed mightily, yet EMILY's List faltered, as 74 percent of the challengers it backed lost their general election contests.

“In the current campaign cycle, meanwhile, the group has drawn fire from other Democrats for employing divisive tactics--from pitting abortion-rights Democratic women against Democratic congressmen who also favor abortion rights, to feuding publicly with another high-profile abortion-rights group about its decision to endorse Obama.

“EMILY's List has won wide praise over the years for leveraging the power of women at the polls and building an unprecedented network of progressive female donors. But now some political observers say that the group's influence may be waning.”  

Victor writes: "Although Hagel and Kerry remain friends with McCain, their political ties to him are frayed, if not severed. Hagel, who is not seeking reelection this year, has not even endorsed McCain, now the presumptive Republican nominee. Hagel’s independent-spirited wife has contributed $500 to Sen. Barack
Obama of Illinois, McCain’s Democratic rival for the White House. ... Kerry, meanwhile, has emerged as a leading surrogate for Obama and as one of the most aggressive counterpunchers to McCain. ...

"In the insular world of the Senate, where the importance of personal relationships
is magnified, the positioning of Hagel and Kerry in this year’s presidential contest is especially striking. After all, they have worked with McCain on various issues over the years and, like him, are members of the so-called band of brothers, the small group of senators who saw combat in Vietnam."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

AS a black woman I have experienced 62 years of both sexism and racism and to me, racism far outweighs sexism.  For a white male to claim otherwise makes me laugh.  I would challenge him to spend 24 hours in my black female body and see what he thinks then!!
As a long-time supporter of Emily's List, I think too many posters here have ignored its many successes in the past. Just about every Democratic woman in the House and the Senate was elected initially with support from Emily's List even if some are no longer so supported (eg Blanche Lincoln was dropped when her voting record became less progressive). Let's remember what it was like before the first Emily's List candidate was elected to the Senate--Barbara Mikulski. There were at most one or two women in the Senate at any given time. The same is true in the House--not to mention the success of Emily's List at the state level also. Emily's List has NEVER said that women would vote for women simply because they were women regardless of their positions on the issues. Rather, it has said that progressive women in government will advance different priorities from men and will give women's concerns an important voice. Yes, Hillary lost. I will leave it to future historians to figure out why. I think we are too close to her loss now to understand fully why. But Emily's List is much more than Hillary. And it's supporting many excellent candidates this year. I cannot speak to the Tennessee situation and it may be unfortunate, but it's just one instance. No one (or organization) is perfect all the time. Ellen Malcolm's vision of so many years ago has made a major impact in this nation and continues to do so.
Gender based voting is as sexist as it gets.  Disregarding the issues ignoring the ethics of the candidates and voting for a candidate because of their genitalia is barbaric.  

Hillary Clinton is not a great politician, she did not even run her campaign well.  Hillary managed to get as far as she did because of her sex.  Feraro was almost right, she just got the name wrong and the bias wrong.
I certainly hope the influence of Emily's List is waning!  I am a female, over 40, and I do not and never have voted for a candidate because of their sex.  It is just that simple, Emily's List is so OVER, I hope.  We should all vote for the candidate we feel will be the best, not like sheep following along.
At 64 I was one of the first of 10 women in the auto plants.  I can tell you that I was given the hardest job and lost 17 pounds in 3 weeks.  I survived.  I lived through it, became stronger for it and understood that sexism was a top down strategy by corporate America to keep us divided.  As a white woman with an African American boyfriend, I was almost attacked by 13 white guys who didn't like my choices, luckily, I was fast on my feet! From my point of view, it was easier to be accepted as a women who could prove myself than my "crime" of an inter-racial relationship. Racism in this country trumps everything and it still exists.  Is it better?  Yes. What makes my heart sing is all of the white folks voting for Obama and putting aside what they've been taught or heard. The youth that we raised are better than we are and we should hail this as the first real social progress we've seen since the 60's.  I'll vote for Obama not because I think he's perfect, or that I agree with all he says or is.  I'll vote for him for the future of these tenacious young folks! (BYW, I was a very tenacious women's libber!) Obama 08!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1172456

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google