ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



DNC blasts McCain on Trade, Colombia

Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 12:22 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Alex Wall and Katie Mulhall
DNC Vice Chair Linda Chavez-Thompson and Chief Economist for Unite Here Mark Levinson railed against McCain’s support for President Bush’s “failed” trade policies in response to the senator’s trip to Colombia. During the conference call, the duo also called into question McCain adviser Charlie Black’s role as a lobbyist pushing the Colombia Free Trade Agreement.
 

VIDEO: A Race for the White House panel looks at the new Gallup poll and discusses whether John McCain is committing politcal suicide by sticking with Bush.

Chavez-Thompson cited the two-and-a-half million U.S. jobs lost due to Bush’s trade policies and warned that McCain’s support of the Colombia Free Trade Agreement would further U.S. job loses. 

“Time and time again, we have seen nothing but a continuation of policies that have failed working people,” Chavez-Thompson said.
 
Chavez-Thompson went on to criticize McCain for “putting lobbyists and special interests first.” The group specifically cited Black’s past role as a lobbyist as a “legitimate reason” to question “who is advising the McCain campaign, who is influencing his policies [and] who would be part of his administration?”
 
Levinson argued that the contrast between the two presidential candidates’ campaign schedules is indicative of what constituencies they consider important. 

“At a time when American workers are suffering, we think the contrast couldn’t be greater,” Levinson said. “While John McCain is in Colombia, Obama is in Ohio.”  Levinson referred to the Buckeye state as “ground zero” for U.S. workers.

“Barack Obama’s shifting positions on free trade won’t add more jobs or get our economy back on track,” McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said. “During the Democratic primary, Sen. Obama called NAFTA a ‘big mistake’ and pledged to unilaterally renegotiate it, but now he calls his previous position ‘overheated and amplified.’ You can’t change your position depending on who you’re talking to or what election you’re in and expect to be taken seriously. That’s pandering, not leadership. As his recent reversals on key issues like NAFTA, FISA, the Second Amendment and public financing clearly show, Barack Obama’s words don’t mean that much to him. So we’ll stay tuned to see what his position is tomorrow.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I have been a long time reader to the FR site, but this is my first time posting.

I have some questions that I would like someone to address:

1) Why is it that no one is addressing the fact congress rating is even lower than GWB's at 18% according to  recent polls?  Dems have had control of Congress for two years.  I understand veto authority of the President having a significant impact on what Congress can do, but don't you think the rating would be higher than the PoTUS especially if it's run by the party that is NOT in the WH?

2)  Personally I don't think either candidate is the best choice for America.  However, why are so many people putting faith in someone who is preaching change, yet continues to practice politics the way it has been done for the past 60 years?  On the flip side, JM is WAY out of line for attacking BO due to the issues he has flip-flopped on.  McCain has done just as much flip-flopping, if not more.  

3) Hillary Clinton made a comment several weeks ago in her concession speech about how there have only 3 terms in which the Democrats in the WH since in 40 years.  Does it make sense that most Americans have "traditional (not necessarily conservative) views" on family and society in general?  It seems like BO is moving to the left to make it seem he is more appealing to that main stream vote?  His voting record in both IL and US Senate show he is about as far left as you can go.  Does this bother Liberals who have seen him move more "Center" in the past few days?

4) The Republican party is in turmoil right now.  JM is the person who is representing them and most don't like him.  Is his decision to move more right going to help or hurt him in the long run?  Will someone like Colin Powell or JC Watts on the Republican ticket move people towards him?

I am just trying to get some questions answered.  I know who I am voting for in November, but I just want to try to get rational, non-emotional responses to some of the questions I have had for the past several weeks/months.
Why is it that every discussion in this election camapign begin with a discussion of surrogates or lobbyists on one side or the other.  There are lobbyists who are surrogates on both sides.  We know that....move on.

This should be a discussion on trade agreements and whether their unfairly impact American workers.  It should be about whether there is a level playing field between American workers and their foreign counterparts.  It should be about whether some agreements need to be renegotiated.

This economy is a mess and a discussion about who lobbied for who will not help us understand which candidate has the better solution for Armerica.
Neither of these two have any clue on the economy.  To be honest I don't think either of them would do well for this country.  I am a conservative and will vote that way in Nov, but not overly excited about it.

Also, since first read won't comment on WP's mortgage rate issue with Obama....if the Average is 5.94 and he got 5.6 (or whatever he actually got) that means he probably has above average credit and the finances to pay the loan.  You have to have lower than average numbers to get that as the average.  I'll defend Obama on this (the lot next door though is a concern)

I really hope the GOP doesn't attact the interest rate as its not that uncommon.  If he had got 4.5% then I would have concerns.
Poor Cindy! She will have to sit there while McCain and Chavez talk business over a bong......

Gives true meaning to the term STEPFORD WIVES.
Who is McCain to talk about pandering -- pot/kettle politics again from these guys!

The fact is, Obama's campaign has been talking about compromise and moving forward on issues the entire campaign.  He is a pragmatic candidate -- his State Senate experience in Illinois shows that.  Yes, the man can make a speech.  But truly, he is concerned about good government.  So, let's stop the whole flip-flop garbage and get to the truth here.  

Obama's work is showing, again and again, that he takes leadership seriously.  McCain shows us every day how much he values corporations, Big Oil, lobbyists, and how much he has no idea what makes "regular people" tick.  He doesn't know us and he doesn't care to.  

http://ilfamilypolitics.blogspot.com
Honestly! Is McCain the best the GOP could come up with? How embarrassing!
It's kinda fun watching McCain spokesmen trying to nail down Obama.  Most of the important issues are not something you can answer with "Yes" or "No" or a quick sound bite.  Obama will give a salient (not long winded) answer. Then comes the GOP distorton.  I don't recall Obama calling NAFTA a "Big Mistake", but rather he was/is for free trade, but trade that had some controls leading to a level playing field.

The Obama push-back is McCain has no intention of changing NAFTA, thus the people in Ohio, Penn, Indiana will continue to suffer.  By November the GOP will suffer and not really know why.
Notice once again the McCain camp doesn't back up their own positions, just try to smear Obama. Glad I'm not associated with the REPANDERERS any longer.
Brian Rogers, maybbe you need to consider your client's flip flops. I will help. Here's a runnign list.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9111.html

Let's close the borders and stop trading with china, Europe, Mexico, South America, and the rest of the world because we are losing jobs.

Come on DNC, what about the jobs created in the US when we trade with the world?

NOBAMA.
FINALLY, The DNC brings up the 2 ton elephant that everyone is ignoring in the room...

Let's see if the media piles on this one, or if they continue to focus on "what one of the people that obama once met said sort of about McCons possible half sister that he hasn't seen since he was three..."
“At a time when American workers are suffering, we think the contrast couldn’t be greater,” Levinson said. “While John McCain is in Colombia, Obama is in Ohio.”  
---------------------------------------------------
And Obama is so great that all he has to do is show up in a place and jobs follow him?  Give me a break.  By the way, what IS Obama's position on NAFTA today?  Or should I check his campaign schedule and see what state he's in, since that is what generally determines his stance?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1180319

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google