ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Obama focuses on energy security

Posted: Friday, July 11, 2008 4:23 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones


DAYTON, Ohio -- Obama made his third trip to the battleground state of Ohio since the primary season ended, holding a town hall on energy security here at which he spoke about the need to “end the tyranny of oil”.

The energy-focused event, held in front of a mixed crowd of about 1,300 people packed into a gymnasium, was aimed at connecting with a voting public that has been struggling with high gas prices and other economic hardships.

VIDEO: Barack Obama addresses the U.S. energy crisis at a rally in Ohio. NBC's Athena Jones reports.

Calling the price of a barrel of oil “one of the most dangerous weapons in the world,” Obama argued America’s dependence on foreign oil was a threat to national security and that Washington and politicians like McCain had not offered long-term strategies.

The senator announced no new proposals as he laid out his plans for a new energy policy, including support for research and development into alternative fuels and raising fuel efficiency standards, and highlighted his differences with McCain on energy in general and on specific issues like the gas tax holiday proposal to offshore drilling in particular.

Obama slammed McCain for voting against clean biofuels, solar power, wind power and against an energy bill that represented the largest investment in renewable sources of energy in the history of this country and mocked the Arizona senator’s recent remarks that Washington had done little over the last 30 years to reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil, noting that McCain has been in Washington for about 26 years.

“When he talks about the failure of politicians in Washington to do anything about our energy crisis, understand that John McCain should look in the mirror because Sen. McCain has been a part of that failure,” he said.

The presumptive Democratic nominee plans to focus on national security next week, addressing what he called “new threats” like climate change, stateless terrorists, loose nuclear weapons and the spread of pandemic disease.

The RNC responded this way: “Barack Obama’s rhetoric on energy is at complete odds with his record.  Today, Barack Obama launched an unbridled attack on the ’05 energy bill that he voted for, and then had the audacity to criticize John McCain for voting against it.  Which is it, did he support President Bush’s 2005 energy bill or oppose it, because we’re confused?”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I've come to the conclusion that any 1 term senator is wholly unqualified to be POTUS. Anyone who votes for this charlatan deserves what they get!
The GOP finally admits it. They're "confused."

Thank you for the kind comments.

Sen. Obama should hit the Maverick daily on his blatant gas-tax holiday pander and offshore drilling propositions.  Sen. McCain would actually have to show up to work to even get the holiday pander en route but even Darth Cheney didn't like the idea (along with every reasonable economist) so that legislation would be DOA.  I love how many conservatives parrot the Heritage Foundation's talking points with regards to oil drilling.  McCain has already admitted that offshore drilling would only give American's a "psychological" boost.  This "mental" line of reasoning when dealing with the economy and energy policy has become a staple of his philosophy.

In more pressing news, it has been learned that the Iranian missile test firings were fake.  I sure hope that Mr. Bush isn't trying to pull a quick Gulf of Tonkin on us.
Nice Barack Obama - very Presidential and we real American voters will be happy to vote you as our next President.

Unlike the weak and sad Republicans that claim to be Americans - we democrats have proud in our country

Thank you and GOD BLESS AMERICA
I believe that Obama is vunerable on energy.

He proposed a new energy policy, including support for research and development into alternative fuels and raising fuel efficiency standards.  He has stated that the price of a barrel of oil is “one of the most dangerous weapons in the world". Further he has said we need to "end the tyranny of oil”.

Not once did he explain how!  What are the specific proposals that will lead to this goal?  What short-term solutions do you have to relieve the pain at the pump? We need something to fill the gap between the development of alternative fuel sources and the problems of today.  Something like modernizing existing refineries to increase capacity and supply and building new refineries.

In this case, I want to hear the specifics and not the rhetoric.
I thought that this election was going to be close. No way. Obama is going to trounce this guy.
Phil Graham's comments and the fact that he is McCain's economic guur is this cycle's "I voted for it, before I voted against it" moment. McCain is toast. What an embarrassment he is. Sorry repubs. Your guy is a laughing stock of a candidate.
I just read the article regarding Bush leaving the question of regulating greenhouse gases to the next President - I quess it will have to be on Barack's plate, because McCain wouldn't do anymore than Bush.
"Regulation" eeeeck, run and hide - under a sunbrella, as the earth burns up.
I've come to the conclusion that any 1 term senator is wholly unqualified to be POTUS. Anyone who votes for this charlatan deserves what they get!
______________________________________________________

To American Voter:  Obama is no charlatan but McCain is and obviously YOU ARE. Which organization you know of where length of service qualifies you to be president of the company? If this was so why progressive companies have a ‘fast track policy’ to identify bright minds and clear the path that leads to the top. Wake up! Better yet go back to school and learn some sense before you post another piece of crap.
who's got the better plan moving forward...
Renewable fuels like celluosic biodiesel (trash into fuel), solar (MIT is in the news today for working on exsisting methods for making solar extremely affordable) and wind power (no lack of that in washington)


Barack has the plan that will kill two birds with one stone.  Getting us off the "fossil fuel" dragon, and limiting the funds that go to radical extremist countries through the sale of oil.
Obama thinks the "price of oil" is a weapon. Great news. So lets look what Obama wants to do about it. 1) Raise taxes on the oil companies. Okay, how does that help? 2) Not explore and collect any oil on US land. Okay, how does that help? 3) Not secure peace in the middle east by surrendering to the terrorists. Okay, how does that help?

Obama has got to be one of the biggest frauds ever presented to this country.
Obama confuses a lot of people. Is he white or is he black? Is he conservative or a liberal. Is he a man or a woman. So many questions.
I've said that before. McFossil has been in the Senate for the last 26 YEARS. Exactly WHAT legislation has he passed for Energy security? None. Zero, Zip. And we're all to believe that he's NOW concerned? This man is a joke and his supporters are even more pathetic than he is! He'll be lucky to hold onto his Senate seat after losing in November by a landslide. At least everyone is getting the REAL picture of what a flawed person he truly is.
"It's Leadership Stupid". The fact that Congress and past Presdients for over the last 30 years have not done enough to properly fund, support and encourage research into alternate fuels and energy, and the fact that McCain has been part of that club for 26 of those years is enough said. If a "1 term" Senator undertands the need to get serious about alternate fuels and energy versus McCain taking 26 years years in the Senate to realize the same (if he has realized the same) tells me that the "1 term Senator" is much more qualified to be President then someone who has had 26 years to solve these problems but has done nothing. Oh, but now that he is running for President McCain is promising to place more emphasis on alternate fuels and energy. What a crock. Out with the old, in with the new. Obama, 08.    
Ira, Freehold, NJ - I don't recall John McCain explaining his policies either.  

How do you explained in details policies during a new conference.  

Get Real
Obama needs to make it clear, that he voted for the energy bill of '05 in order to get the biofuels, solar fuels, and wind power portions of the bill passed.

G-D help us. How many American's know that Bush, and Cheney are themselves Big Oil men?

G-D help us.
Obama is perfectly right. OPEC is holding the world at ransom and past and present leaders failed to recognize the precarious positions they put their countries in by lack of foresight and the naïve belief the commodity would have always been affordable. Let us not fool ourselves; the war in Iraq is all about oil and that warmonger Bush is itching to attack Iran before he demits office. In all fairness I don’t think Iran is the aggressor. Their nuclear launches were more a show of defense, to the point they actually falsify a launch in a misguided effort of showing their ability to protect themselves. To Israel – hold your horses and allow sanity to prevail. You are a bright nation and the world expects you to act in accordance with your intelligence. To Iran – you are but a storm in a teacup so don’t provoke a situation in which you cannot win. To GWB – the world cannot wait to see the back of you so any ideas you have in the back of that empty head of yours to start another war…PERISH THE THOUGHT YOU SILLY MAN!!!!!
Ira, Freehold, NJ (Sent Friday, July 11, 2008 4:41 PM):

Ira:

Obama's proposal (and it is a serious one) to raise  fuel efficiency standards is a good specific proposal. Why? It will force auto-makers and other entrepenuers to begin more serious and legitimate research and creation of alternate fuels and energies for transportation purposes. Until now the auto-makers have been lazy by only slightly increasing gas mileage in new cars when for years they have had the knowledge to build an afforable other fueled vehicle. Other individual invetors have had such knowledge as well but have been criticized and ostracized by the auto-makers who have stubbornly refused to change the direction of their industry. Raising fuel standards will also force the asuto-makers and hopefully new competitors to begin seriously developing beter and more efficient mass-transit transportation systems as mono-rails, etc. The expertise and knowledge is out their. Obama is not a scientist. But he understands that the Presdeiint along withthe support of the people has to take the steps necessary to force the energy geniuses in this country to get with it, drop the dependence on oil and get their butts in gear developing what they already know how to develop. Wil there be some pain i nthe transition. Of course. But in the long run the U.S. will be able to kiss their dependence on oil goodbye. It is up to the President to encourage and enforce this transition through positive leadership and that is what Obama is proposing to do. He just needs the support of the people behind him.  
obama will be the best person to address out energy problems.  McCain just talks about energy and his votes prove other wise

mccain lies about voting record on veterans issues
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/mccain-lies-about-his-voting-record-for-veterans/
or

http://sensico2.blogspot.com/2008/07/my-blogs.html
I love it, Obama just doens't have any idea about energy policy! He just keeps stumbling around trying to find something that might work.

Hope and Change don't pay for the gas Barack!
why are people mad about barack about the fiza he is running for president they say they may have tapped john kerry at least with this bill they cant tap his phone domestically with this bill maybe when he gets in he will fix fiza but he has to cover hiself right now 6 months he can fix this bill
My understanding is that the Oil Companies have rights to 88 mil US acres they can drill as of today but they are either not drilling or apparently have given up on drilling there, because it's apparently not profitable in the near future to explore there.

My questions is that how did they obtain this much land, and how was that land picked to be allocated to them. In addition, is this land sold or leased to the Oil Companies at discounted rates? It would only make sense that the Oil Companies and/or some supposedly educated people in that field had some say into this.
Given that assumption, why do these same people think that we ought to allow them to take possession of more land with no guarantees of drilling? Plus if it were come to pass that they obtained these new lands they desire, i.e. Alaska or off shore drilling in ANWR for the purpose of drilling, would they be willing to give up the 88 mil acres they currently have, and which they insist do not have drilling capacities, or do they want to hoard all this land for future personal use?
John McCain has a good track record of opposing alternative energy.  Now that he is running for president for his third time (since he is superstitious and carries lucky items,maybe he believes this run is charmed)Mr. McCain is supporting development of non-oil fuels.  Makes sense, he has flip flopped on 61 policy stands so far this election season including accepting general funding.
I really want to hear more from the candidates, especially Obama about their plans to improve our energy supply.  And please, no more corn ethanol!  It's just a boondoggle for farmers and raises everyone's food costs.  Alternative fuels like algae or those that use the whole plant make far more sense.  Wouldn't it rock to send the hundreds of billions in oil money we send overseas each year to our own country?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1195869

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google