ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



First thoughts: Double-edged sword

Posted: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:16 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** The double-edged sword: With the news that the network anchors, including NBC’s Brian Williams, are planning to catch up with Obama on his overseas trip -- when they didn’t do the same for McCain when he traveled abroad -- the New York Times today raises this conversation starter: that the “news media are imbalanced in their coverage of the candidates.” There is no doubt that Obama, because of his historical candidacy as well as being the “new” candidate, is receiving more attention. But that presents both rewards and risks. Consider: Just how big of a gaffe would have McCain’s Sunni-Shiite mistake been had the network anchors all been there to cover it? The extra attention Obama receives also brings more scrutiny. And that's why his trip overseas presents both rewards and risks. And this is the lemons-vs.-lemonade debate the McCain campaign must be having. First, they need to figure out how to bracket this trip and keep pressure on Obama and the reporters covering him there. The time difference will present a challenge, as most of the news Obama makes will be during our broadcasts downtimes. Second, they may need to rethink how they are presenting McCain and the opportunities they are offering the media to cover him in unique and different settings. The irony to the extra coverage this trip is getting for Obama is that the RNC themselves helped hype this trip with their countdown clock on the number of days it's been since Obama last went to Iraq. 

VIDEO: Presidential hopeful Barack Obama is heading on a five-country European and Middle East tour. NBC's chief White House correspondent, David Gregory, reports.

*** On target: As the political world anticipates Obama’s upcoming overseas trip, his campaign this morning released a shiny object for us to discuss: his June fundraising numbers. In an email to supporters, campaign manager David Plouffe announced that Obama raised $52 million last month -- which is his second-best haul (he raised more than $55 million in February) and it’s more than twice the amount of McCain’s $22 million haul for June (which was his best month). While Obama raised much more than the $30 million-plus that the Wall Street Journal reported last week, Obama’s $52 million is about what he should have raised for a candidate who is opting out of public funds for the general. Assuming that Obama rakes in at least $50 million each month from June until the end of October, that will be a minimum of $250 million. And when making the time calculation it takes to raise money, the ability to raise $250 million in five months was seen by many as the minimum a candidate would have to be able to raise to justify opting out and dismantling a finance team. By comparison, if you project that McCain will raise $20 million per month from June to August and combine that with the $84 million in public funds he’ll receive after the GOP convention, McCain will have $140 million-plus. Of course, the RNC has a significant advantage over the DNC -- but that race is narrowing. A DNC officials tells First Read it raised $22.4 million in June (up from its $4 million in May), and it’s cash on hand is $20 million (again, up from $4 million in May). By comparison, the RNC raised $25.7 in June and has $68.7 million cash on hand.

*** More numbers: A couple of more notes on Obama’s June haul: All but $2 million was in primary money. Also, contrary to the email that Plouffe issued, the Obama campaign tells us that they have $72 million cash on hand. When you combine that with the DNC’ $20 million, that’s $92 million cash on hand -- which is almost equal to combined McCain-RNC cash on hand of nearly $95 million. Still, McCain really doesn’t have a money problem. In fact, as Rick Davis bragged last week, money isn't going to be the issue many thought it would be just two months ago. Why is this? It appears many Republican donors are buying into the argument that the ONLY shot Republicans have of winning anything is the presidency. And this is hurting Republicans running for the House and Senate where Democrats are dominating on the financial front. Yesterday, the DSCC released a list of 11 races being held in GOP-held seats, and the Democrats were nearly on par or ahead in every race, according to the most recent fundraising report. Question: Are we seeing the reverse '96 effect taking place inside the GOP? In 1996, the word went out that Dole was a lost cause, and all of the GOP's resources went to saving House and Senate candidates in order to preserve their control of Congress. This cycle, the chance of the GOP winning control of either the House or the Senate appears beyond remote. Does that mean many of the professional GOP-givers are gravitating toward sending money to causes that help McCain? It sure looks like it.

*** Going overboard? Do we go overboard on the veepstakes vetting issue? Riddle us this: Would either Obama or McCain vet on the standard the media and the chattering class is holding? Would Obama have the experience or pull in any swing states? Would McCain be considered enough of a change agent? What state would he swing? Our point is that if both candidates think about this VP thing long enough, they'll realize that they got their nominations without all the things they are being told they need... Doesn't that mean it's likely they’ll pick running mates with whom they bond more than they will via some electoral idea? Discuss!

VIDEO: MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski talks with Mitt Romney about the presidential campaign.

*** Meet Mitt Romney: Speaking of veepstakes, over the next few weeks, First Read will run a series -- in no particular order -- of some things you might not know about the potential VP candidates. Today, we start on the Republican side with Mitt Romney. Most know his father was governor Michigan and ran for president in 1968, but Romney's mother, Lenore, also ran for office. She lost her bid for U.S. Senate in 1970… Romney received a draft deferment while serving as a Mormon missionary in France during the Vietnam War… When in France, he was declared dead after a near-fatal car accident… And don’t forget this: Right before the New Hampshire primary, Romney cast doubt on McCain's ability to match up with the Hope-and-Change machine, as ABC reported yesterday. "I frankly don't think that Senator McCain, despite his service and his length of experience, that that's going to be able to stand up to the message that Barack Obama has brought forward," he said. "I think Barack Obama would be able to do to John McCain exactly what he was able to do to the other senators who are running on the Democratic side."

*** Mr. Ozone comes to Washington: Al Gore delivers a speech on global warming that the AP’s Fournier previews after speaking with the former vice president. "Just as John F. Kennedy set his sights on the moon, Al Gore is challenging the nation to produce every kilowatt of electricity through wind, sun and other Earth-friendly energy sources within 10 years, an audacious goal he hopes the next president will embrace. The Nobel Prize-winning former vice president said fellow Democrat Barack Obama and Republican rival John McCain are ‘way ahead’ of most politicians in the fight against global climate change. Rising fuel costs, climate change and the national security threats posed by U.S. dependence on foreign oil are conspiring to create ‘a new political environment’ that Gore said will sustain bold and expensive steps to wean the nation off fossil fuels.” The real trick for Gore this time around in selling his campaign on climate change is how you pitch this public policy at a time when voters simply want their cost of living to go down and the biggest hit on cost of living these days is the price of gas.

*** On the trail: McCain holds a town hall in Kansas City, MO before heading to a fundraiser in Ferrysburg, MI. Obama is scheduled to be in Chicago.

*** Spouse watch: Michelle Obama hits a fundraiser in Seattle for Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire (D), who’s up for re-election in November. And Cindy McCain is on the bipartisan ONE Campaign trip to Africa.

*** Bill Clinton watch: The former president, in New York, appears at a Clinton Foundation announcement with leading drug manufacturers.

Countdown to Dem convention: 39 days
Countdown to GOP convention: 46 days
Countdown to Election Day 2008: 110 days
Countdown to Inauguration Day 2009: 187 days
 
Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

All I can say is that if we recall history, Adolph Hitler was voted into office by the people of his time.  They, too, thought he was "the answer to their prayers."  American voters, take a better look at what's going on.  American press, dig more deeply into the past on candidates and DON'T apologize or back pedal when the stuff hits the fan.  There's been too much of that going on recently.  Get back to journalism should be about.  We need an unbiased, unapologitic INDEPENDENT American press AGAIN.  You've let us down.  Get your act together, please!
What really irritates me is that there's no coverage of substantive events such as the summit Obama held yesterday.   He has held several on different issues.  The MSM keeps talking about how the public doesn't know much about Obama, or that he doesn't offer specifics on how he would solve problems.   Watching the summits (which are streamed on CNN-Live) allows one to understand the depth of Obama's knowledge, wisdom, and openness to considering others' ideas.   It really makes his thoughtful and mature style of leadership apparent.   He's all about brainstorming rather than being a dictator.    

Covering such events would offer the voters useful knowledge rather than constant gaffes & "gotcha" moments.  

Why doesn't McCain hold any such summits?   All we see of him is staged town meetings where he rambles on with his often conflicting, erroneous, talking points.
Since the GOP donors have abandoned the House and Senate candidates can we finally admit that Sen. Obama is the strongest candidate?  Watch for the different GOP state parties to push that panic button in the next few months.  It's going to happen first in states like Iowa, Montana, and Indiana (where McCain's poor organization only has a phone number while Obama is opening more offices).  I also look forward to see more Republicans make more commercials in the mold of the Gordon Smith ad.  It is going to be great to see President Obama be given the mandate to govern with all of these senate and house pickups.  I wonder what the new fundraising mark is going to be according to the MSM...60 mil, 70 mil?
nashville fan and ck steele seem to have nailed this one...

Imbalanced coverage does not mean "air time" or # of reporters following a candidate around.  It is what the editorial board/producers choose to air and how how often.  

50 reporters can tag behind Obama and only report/question/analysis potential shifts and gaffes.

5 reporters can tag behind McCain and never question or offer analysis of his shifts and gaffes.

You do cover each other more now.  Endless cycling from the am to pm shows - appearing as guests and reporters - with each other.  Incest usually breeds bad stuff.

And FR says:

In fact, as Rick Davis bragged last week, money isn't going to be the issue many thought it would be just two months ago. Why is this? It appears many Republican donors are buying into the argument that the ONLY shot Republicans have of winning anything is the presidency. And this is hurting Republicans running for the House and Senate...
****************************************************

Does this seem news worthy to anyone? I know it was a gift from the daily emails that provide you with your talking points for the day, but maybe you could have shared it some real reporters.  It ought to be worth a paragraph or two.  Or maybe the campaign gave you another shiny object to share with us...later.

 
I can not believe what I am reading. YOU, the press have given McFossil a free pass on EVERY stupid thing he has said.

I'm sure Tim Russert is rolling over in his grave.

You all forget what he stood for in reporting?

Sheesh
Nashville-fan--
Right on!!  Obama = foresight and McCain/Bush/Cheney = rearview mirror.
Yeah! Obsessed with getting him the hell out of the race. Obama is pure genious and I heard this from one of your conservative buddies on chicago public radio.
Joey, if this was church, I would be in your amen corner
First read,

You must be reading the Republican talking points that Obama is getting more coverage than John McCain. That's ridiculous. Every move Obama makes is covered and then run in loops. The press continues to give McCain a free ride.

So Obama is going to Europe and Middle East. Some will say at the urging of McCain which is absurd. Obama just finished the primary season in June while McCain had extra months he essentially wasted taking his weekends off.

Fair coverage is in the eyes of the reader or viewer. The media is definitely not giving Obama more coverage or more favorable coverage. I think they continue to recite the Republican talking points of the day, overlook McCain's gafees (and lack of memory for details) and that's something you folks in the media should take a hard look at.
Chuck Todd,

This will be the last time i'll be giving you a benefit of doubt on your analysis. I have noticed something serious about your reporting ever since Tim Russert died. Your analysis has been dead wrong and you tend to spin more rather than report the facts.

For example, you said Obama is like George Bush because he hired competent people to run his campaign. Your analysis is disgusting and without merit. For all the talk about factual analysis, you guys have been pretty much wrong. You like regurgitating Republican talking point and by doing so you're putting MSBC rating in danger.

Sometime last week, WSJ reported how terrible Obama's fundraising where for the month of June. I remember Obama saying you guys don't have your facts right, yet, the media talking head keeps giving the public what is not factual. At what point are you guys going to take responsibility for reporting nonsense. If there is anything we’ve come to know in this election cycle is not to report on Obama’s fund raising until he release his numbers. How many times have the MSM been wrong? By my own count, they’ve been wrong on his fund raising 100% of the time. Why would you guys even risk putting your delicate reputation in jeopardy? Stick with the facts and stop reporting spin.

I think the entire MSBC owe the public 100% factual reporting without injecting their wrongful opinion. If MSNBC doesn't want to loose readership and viewers, it is important they get the story right. I have heard enough of the talking head lying to the American people. Comparing Obama to George Bush is beyond pale and no reasonable person can believe that except people like you that live in Belt Way bubble. Obama has already said “he doesn’t want drama” and as far as I can tell Bush’s white house is full of drama and incompetents. Again, stick to the fact and stop reporting spin.
It would be very nice if the MSM would put together the pattern of McCain's political career from time to time, and go into your tape archives and pull out the videos of McCain contradicting himself on tax cuts, Iraq, Afghanistan, climate change(voluntary cap and trade?), privatization of social security, balancing the budget, torture, warrantless eavesdropping, and so on.  By all means do the same for Obama.  But letting McCain say he can't recall saying he said he knew nothing about economics should be played as often as Hillary's Clinton's "tale of two Tuzlas." It's just as important, and yet, McCain gets away every day with murdering the truth. Time for Straight Talk, methinks. Get off your duffs, MSNBC and analyze something that last longer than frog sex.
Josephine, take a chill pill.  How dare you compare Hitler to Obama or the movement that is taking place?  That was a movement of hate and Obama is talking inclusion - a word NOT in the GOP who always go out to divide and conquer.

The GOP doesn't know how to campaign honestly.  The party has supported a war criminal.  You guys have no morals.  
No one is excited for McCain, how could you be?  The voters in November will be voting for Obama or against him.  Either way it's all about Obama so that's one reason he's getting all the coverage.  
Practically every day McCain says something dumb and it gets buried by the MSM.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1203669

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google