ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama: Previewing the next two days

Posted: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:16 AM by Domenico Montanaro

The AP: “Obama traveled to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency on Tuesday for talks with tribal leaders who joined the fight against al-Qaida in Iraq and now seek a deeper role in Iraq's political future. Obama, wrapping up his stop in Iraq, gathered with leaders of the so-called Awakening Council movement in Ramadi, one of the main cities of the western Anbar Province where al-Qaida once had the upper hand against embattled U.S. and Iraqi troops. Tribal sheiks last year began an uprising against insurgents that is credited with uprooting extremist strongholds and helping bring violence around Iraq to its lowest levels in four years.”

VIDEO: Following a visit to Iraq, where he discussed plans for U.S. troop withdrawal, presidential hopeful Barack Obama heads to Jordan for talks with King Abdullah. NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports from Amman.

NBC/NJ’s Athena Jones previews Obama’s jam-packed stop in Israel tomorrow. He will meet first with Defense Minister Ehud Barak, then with opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu. After that, he’ll visit the Holocaust museum and memorial at Yad Veshim, and will meet with President Shimon Peres. He then heads to Ramallah to meet with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad; then he heads to Sderot; and finally visits in the evening with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. He will also meet with Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni at some point tomorrow, and it isn’t yet clear whether Obama will have a chance to visit the Western Wall, an important religious site in Jerusalem.

It is important for Obama to visit Sderot, a border town that has come under repeated rocket attacks from Hamas, advisers said. “The significance is self-evident,” said one. “It’s a place in which Israel’s security is every day at risk and threatened and Sen. Obama will have the opportunity to see that firsthand and to get a very personal feel for the everyday implications of that insecurity for the residents of Sderot.”

In a pen-and-pad briefing this morning outlining the trip, Obama advisers were pressed repeatedly on the size, scope, and character of Obama’s planned speech in Berlin on Thursday, Jones adds. “There’s a great deal of interest in his visit. We want to accommodate that interest,” said chief strategist David Axelrod when asked about the thousands of people expected at the event.

Advisers said the content of the speech would speak for itself and stressed that the simple fact that large numbers of people were expected to attend does not make it a “campaign speech” because it has nothing to do with campaigns. “The speech is not going to be a speech about campaign issues. He is not going to address campaign issues in terms of other candidates. It is not a speech about American politics. It is not a campaign event. We are not trying to recruit support from the crowds that are coming. It is not a campaign event,” Axelrod said, later allowing that: “Anything you do in the midst of a campaign will be viewed by some through that prism.”

Axelrod later said, “Any event outside of a CODEL is a campaign event. But it is not a political rally. He will not engage his American political opponents. It is a speech to our allies and the people of Europe and the world. And as such, we wanted it to be open to the public and not just invited guests."

After speaking with residents of Jordan, the New York Times says there is “one point they may now agree on: If elected president, Senator Barack Obama will not fundamentally recalibrate America’s relationship with Israel, or the Arab world.” 

“The reporter who wrote a New Yorker magazine article tied to the controversial cover satirizing Barack and Michelle Obama as flag burners was not granted a seat on the candidate's plane for his Mideast trip this week,” the New York Post reports.

And Republican South Carolina state senator Kevin Bryant "is being criticized for a post on his blog that shows photos of Barack Obama and Osama bin Laden wearing similar clothing, along with a line that says the difference between them is 'a little B.S.'... It appears to be a photo of a T-shirt with images of bin Laden and Obama wearing turbans and the words 'OBAMA' AND 'OSAMA,' with the 'B' and 'S' highlighted in red… ‘It's just one of those pictures that I received by e-mail,' Bryant told The Associated Press on Monday. 'I hope people will understand the sarcasm in it.'" Apparently on vacation under a rock, Bryant said he actually wasn't aware of the flap over The New Yorker cover.
 
"I see a lot of hypocrisy of all the things that are said about our president, yet Sen. Obama is untouchable," Bryant said. "Nobody seems to have a problem when they bash Bush. It seems like a double-standard to me."

Of course, Bryant wasn't criticizing Obama's experience. He was comparing him to Osama bin laden.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

First Read: " AP: “Obama traveled to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency on Tuesday"

Operative word here is FORMER. It's former because Geroge Bush stuck to the plan of winning in Iraq. If Bush didn't, then Obama would playing Duck and Cover in the region, and negotiating with local terrorist groups rather then terrorist fighters.
“The reporter who wrote a New Yorker magazine article tied to the controversial cover satirizing Barack and Michelle Obama as flag burners was not granted a seat on the candidate's plane for his Mideast trip this week,” the New York Post reports."
___________

I'm tired of "journalists" like Rachel Skar and others trying to manufacture a story and act like this was revenge.

"The campaign received 200 media requests for 40 available seats."

80% of the people that asked for a spot didn't get one.  Just because Ryan Lizza didn't get a seat doesn't mean it's revenge.  There is no proof of it, and none is even being offered by the critics.  The only thing being offered is poor journalism.
Obama is soooooo incoherient when he is off script. When a reporter, who was actually doing his job, was going to ask Obama about The Surge and the postitive effects it has had, Obama wouldn't even let the reporter (T.Moran-ABC) ask the question. A few minutes later, and after lots of hand-waving, stuttering, and stammering by Obama, he (Obama) still was totally incoherient.
This trip has been the best PR Dems could have hoped for.  He looks Presidential, because he IS Presidential.  Get used to it, he's our next POTUS and I couldn't be more proud!

PS.  No one has said Obama is untouchable, just that we are all tired of the perpetuation of ancient myths that are baseless and fear monger to the 'low information voter'.
I watched some footage of Obama this morning on the NYT website. Unfortunately, I had to watch with the sound off 'cause I am at work. But it was interesting to see how still his body is, no nervous jiggling or jumpiness. He moves with a reassuring authority. As someone noted yesterday, its remarkable to see all the people grinning around him. I saw a huge soldier with a gun actually fidgeting with impatience waiting for his turn to speak to Obama. That was amazing to see, as usually soldiers look like they want to be anywhere else but meeting the politicians. I turned on the morning shows this am, hoping to see Obama's trip WITH sound, but all they had were stories about fish pedicures.
Styles Morgan
Obama is soooooo incoherient when he is off script

Dude:
In Webster's, beside the word "incoherient", is a picture of McCain in the back of his bus talking about Viagra on the borders of Iraq and Pakistan.
The Holy Scriptures say that G-D helps those who help themselves, and that HE will not improve a condition of a people unless they do what they can to solve what is troubling their situation.

Obama is right to tell the Iraqi people that they must take reponsibility for the maintainance of their freedom from Saddam, or any other oppressive factions that may arise after we have redeployed out of their country.

As a sovereign nation, they have to accept the responsibilities that that entails. They should be proud, brave, and eager to do so. We had their backs, and captured Saddam.  However, our focus needs to return to our primary agenda. American saftey, and prosperity.

It's time for the to Iraqis to either sink, or swim.

We did it. The Founding Fathers lead us to freedom. Maliki, and his ilk need to stand strong, and speak power, and confidence to their people.

McCain says the surge has worked, but we can't leave because everything could break down if we do. Well Americans are not willing to endlessly bleed, and borrow for Iraqi's pursuit of happiness.
Obama understands that often times, a simple conversation can go a long ways toward resolving things.

When Obama met with the Sunni tribal leaders it signaled a dramatic difference to everyone in the world.

Regardless of where we are from, we do not like to be told what to do.  The feeling has been that Bush (and now McCain) refuse to talk with anyone that doesn't do what they tell them.

Being from Wisconsin, I've watched the Packers management and Brett Favre become angry with each other.  Insiders have reported that the two sides have not sat down together and talked.

Heck, anyone who's married knows that communication is the key to a successful marriage.  The same things hold true for raising children. Being involved in our children's lives can prevent serious problems down the road.
I can't wait to see the coverage of Obama's Berlin speech. I've heard they may be expecting over 100,000 people who want to hear him speak. That is just amazing to me. How many does McCain get to gather? Less than 100? Pleeze. The world needs a leader like Obama and I hope we'll give them that come November!
Republican South Carolina state senator Kevin Bryant… the kind of DISGUSTING hate mongering, slimy, sleaze-ball motivation that would incite you to post the Osama/Obama BS comment is the very same reason the GOP is going to get it’s clock cleaned this fall! In case you were on VACATION for the last 7 ½ years, Americans are sick to death of the politics of hate and fear. We are shamed and disgusted that the antics, criminal misdeeds and blatant disrespect of the current administration and its complicit political party, has shown our country and the rest of the civilized world. If you hear a sound it would probably be the death knell of your party’s political aspirations for the future.  And if the voters of the great state of South Carolina have any decency whatsoever they will undoubtedly send you packing as well!!!!!!
Are we overlooking the fact that "contributions" from McCain supporters are predominantly negative. They are so lost and confused they cannot support their candidate with anything positive to say about him. As a result, they go completely negative about the soon to be President Obama.My dad used to remind me, "If you can't say anything good about someone, keep your damn mouth shut."
"Tribal sheiks last year began an uprising against insurgents that is credited with uprooting extremist strongholds and helping bring violence around Iraq to its lowest levels in four years."

 How come the campaign of John Sydney McCain III refuses to acknowledge this and other factors in the decrease in violence in Iraq? He would have us believe that only his belief in the escalation (erroneously called a surge) was a success.
It's amazing how the Rtepublicans are usug Obaam ato drive a racial and political wedge between blacks and whites.

Maybe those that are not white will eventually be pushed into a corner and they will have to re-evaluate their loyalties...... Obviously, the Republicans have opened the door to have Osama be someone we can compare ourselves to...If they can compare thier fellow senator to Osama, who is to say that they can not compare us to him.....

I also find it somewhat stupid that they would give Osama such a pedigree as to compare him to Obama, and then say that the only difference betweenb them is B.S. It makes me wonder then if Osama is that good since Obviously to me Obama is that good.

Makes wonder whom I'd chose bewteen McCain and Osama....I guess I'd use the criteria of whomever is closest to Obama, and the republicans acleary are telling me whom that would be..
First Read: " AP: “Obama traveled to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency on Tuesday"

Operative word here is FORMER. It's former because Geroge Bush stuck to the plan of winning in Iraq. If Bush didn't, then Obama would playing Duck and Cover in the region, and negotiating with local terrorist groups rather then terrorist fighters.
H. House, Jenkins, KS (Sent Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:25 AM)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

House, get off your high horse,

Obama had to duck sniper fire.
Styles Morgan
Obama is soooooo incoherient when he is off script

Dude:
In Webster's, beside the word "incoherient", is a picture of McCain in the back of his bus talking about Viagra on the borders of Iraq and Pakistan.

Judy Bortel Ovilla TX
=====================================================

Judy, these McSame supporters are so twisted, they really don't know what to do. On the one hand, they have a candidate who is a supposed "war hero" who was so far down in his Naval class, that daddy admiral had to get him his job as fighter pilot; a supposed "foreign policy expert" who thinks Iraq borders Pakistan, ans who doesn't know the difference between the Sunnis and Shi'ites. On the other hand, they have a intellectually challenged minion whose main economic adviser calls Americans "whiners" and states the economic crisis is "psychological".
What's worse, the MSM gives him a pass on all of his outrageous missteps, mistakes, flip flops, and downright incompetence:
http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/john_mccain?f=h_hot
So you see, McSame/Bush supporters are in a quandary, not knowing what to do with their worthless dolt of a candidate.
Don't worry, this BS will be over in November.
To H. House,

Of course you are a "low information"  McCain supporter.

Informed americans know there was no surge in Anbar. We started paying the Awakening to fight Al Qaeda.
Donna,
  You are absolutely correct, WE did it, Why can't they? Granted we had the help of the French, But hey we did it "ourselves" why can't they. Donna you prove your ignorance everytime you post here.
First Read: " AP: “Obama traveled to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency on Tuesday"

Operative word here is FORMER. It's former because Geroge Bush stuck to the plan of winning in Iraq. If Bush didn't, then Obama would playing Duck and Cover in the region, and negotiating with local terrorist groups rather then terrorist fighters.

H. House, Jenkins, KS (Sent Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:25 AM)


 The real operative word here is READ. Had you read further, you would have noticed that this was also part of yesterday's news in that many tribal sheiks uprooted extremists in a process they started LAST YEAR. This had nothing to do with Bush policy or even our troops or our strategy. These locals pushed out the extremists who were emboldened to come into Iraq looking to fight and kill Americans.  
Let's face it friends - Obama is awesome and he is proving it on his international trip.  The man is smart, level headed, and the best thing ot happen to our country in 100 years.

Bush and McSame are polar opposites - they are incompetent, foolish blow hards who have ruined this country - will take years to built it back.

The Re-puke policies are for the rich - the people posting here for Bush/McSame are NOT the rich (most are in fact, simpletons).  Why can't you see through the Re-puke BS and embrace a president with policies that favor the whole country instead of a rich few..?

Are you stupid..?





"Obama is soooooo incoherient when he is off script. When a reporter, who was actually doing his job, was going to ask Obama about The Surge and the postitive effects it has had, Obama wouldn't even let the reporter (T.Moran-ABC) ask the question. A few minutes later, and after lots of hand-waving, stuttering, and stammering by Obama, he (Obama) still was totally incoherient. "

Bad for you that you think this way. Because he's gonna be our next POTUS whether you like it or not. Those, who support him will enjoy Obama as a Potus and others will fell what all of us felt during eight years of WORST POTUS ever George Bush. Latest poll for Bush approval  dropped to 21% worst ever recorded...
I can't wait to see the coverage of Obama's Berlin speech. I've heard they may be expecting over 100,000 people who want to hear him speak. That is just amazing to me. How many does McCain get to gather? Less than 100? Pleeze. The world needs a leader like Obama and I hope we'll give them that come November!
-----------------------------------------------------
Yes, because all we need of our leaders is that they can gather a crowd!  Country facing a problem, no worries-Obama can give a speech and it will all be better!  This guy is so weak.
Evidently, Kevin Bryant is without good breeding.  What a shame -- living in the south without breeding.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1213827

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google