ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Democrats label Iraq 'strategic blunder'

Posted: Sunday, August 03, 2008 4:28 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under:

From NBC/NJ’s Matthew Berger
CLEVELAND, Ohio --  The Democratic Party will formally call the decision to go to war with Iraq a “strategic blunder” in its 2008 platform, according to a draft debated Saturday. The party also included language on Iraq withdrawal echoed by its presumptive nomine, Barack Obama, as it expressed a desire to “be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in.”

The party will also add calls for universal healthcare coverage, while keeping the current employer-centric system.

A drafting committee unveiled the 44-page platform for the national party, encompassing both traditional Democratic values and the plans unveiled by Obama.

The party’s draft differs from four years ago on Iraq, when it said “people of good will disagree about whether America should have gone to war in Iraq.” This time, reflecting a shift in American public opinion, the committee hopes to emphasize that “Iraq was a diversion from the fight against the terrorists who struck us on 9-11” while reiterating complaints about the war’s execution. It also echoes Obama’s calls to remove one to two military brigades each month.

“I think the facts are clear now,” Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, drafting committee chair, said after the hearing. “People of good will could disagree with the facts, but as clear as they are now, the facts are manifest that it was a blunder.”

The language on Iraq is consistent with Obama’s position, and is significant for a party that includes many leaders who initially backed the war in Congress. While some, including former Sen. John Edwards, have called the initial support a mistake, others, like Sen. Hillary Clinton, have said the error was largely in the war’s execution.

Obama Senior Foreign Policy Advisor Susan Rice, who presented that section of the draft, said she had not heard complaints from other committee members, but would not know until the full Platform Committee meets and votes on the platform whether it represented the view of most Democrats.

On healthcare, the draft platform adds a call for universal coverage, offering a public plan while stressing people “should have the option of keeping the coverage they have” or participating in private programs.

“The Democratic Party is absolutely unified in a commitment to covering every single American,” said Karen Kornbluth, Obama’s policy director.

The 2004 platform called for “quality, affordable health care for all Americans,” but stopped short of expanding a public program beyond one designed for children. It instead called for individual and business tax credits for more affordable health care and cutting costs.

On the economy, the draft platform calls for an “immediate energy rebate” for American families struggling with the price of gasoline and a $50 billion stimulus plan for building the economy and preventing job loss.

Throughout the meetings Saturday, committee members stressed proposals and language used by both Obama and Clinton during the primary cycle, a sign that the views of both candidates were being incorporated into the party’s updated mission statement.

The committee’s work came after the party received thousands of reports from small group meetings across the country, and after a day and a half of testimony from party members. Those that testified complained of the rising cost of healthcare and fuel, as well as the declining number of blue-collar jobs throughout the country.

“I hear every day about the struggles that are being faced,” said Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.). “This is a phenomenal start in terms of presenting our party’s values, as we hope to engage in this epic challenge in our next session, with our new president.”

The document also includes a section on gender equity, noting the historic nature of Clinton’s presidential campaign, the first woman to win presidential primaries. But it does not include language, advocated by some Clinton supporters, suggesting a “pervasive gender bias in the media.”

“I haven’t seen that yet, but obviously we’re not done with deliberations,” Napolitano said after the meeting.

There was little to no resistance to anything in the draft, with committee members offering new observations and language but not opposing anything in the document. The only opposition came from a small handful of protesters who yelled against going to war with Iran, but then quickly left the room.

The Drafting Committee will conclude its work Sunday. The draft will be voted on by the full Platform Committee next weekend in Pittsburgh, before being formally adopted by the party at the Denver convention later this month.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments


On "Meet the Press":

Joe Lieberman was RIGHT: NObama and the Dims were wrong - the Surge is working in IRAQ, and 15/16 of 18 conditions met...  

NObama and the Dims were WRONG - no wonder NObama can NOT admit it !!!

and, regarding the original removal of Saddam, imagine Saddam with 55 TONS of yellowcake uranium to enrich in past 5 years!!

McCAIN - Judgement to LEAD !!

******** McCAIN in '08 !!!!

On "Meet the Press":

Joe Lieberman was RIGHT: NObama and the Dims were wrong - the Surge is working in IRAQ, and 15/16 of 18 conditions met...  

NObama and the Dims were WRONG - no wonder NObama can NOT admit it !!!

and, regarding the original removal of Saddam, imagine Saddam with 55 TONS of yellowcake uranium to enrich in past 5 years!!

McCAIN - Judgement to LEAD !!

******** McCAIN in '08 !!!!
did these people ask anyone in the military or experts who actually know what is going on thereon their opinions or are they just being a bunch of boobs. I don't care what side anyones one but it seems there trying to dig themselves out of a political hole.
  And i don't mean Biden or Clarke. Biden was Vietnam noncom so asking his opinion on this war is like asking vet from the spanish-american war of his opinions on WW2. And clarke was fired for imcompetence by Clinton. These dumb smucks in the DNC wouldn't know a stragetic position if Russia put missiles on Cuba again.
Exsqueezeme? Why are we telling everybody and their mamas what the Democrats are planning to discuss at their convention? Is it so that the Republicans can sneak a peek and revise their drafts? Geeze! Come on people. We have to learn to keep SOME things to ourselves...
Britney I mean Obama is all Lip Service

Useless lipservice, ripping off Reagans speaches in Germany.

The Obama magic is gone, you can see it at his rallys, now its forced applause.

Britney I mean Obama is full of excuses.
It will take a new Pesident, an invigorated Congress AND the people of this country to change it's direction, heal the economy and reduce the outrageous deficit.
Just say NO to Republicans in November.
It's pretty clear and apparent which party has the welfare of the people in mind.  And yes, the blunder was not only in the execution of the Iraqi war, but the fact that we even went to war with them in the first place.  It was a gross error in judgment.  One in which we should immediately rectify.  We were all lied to and deceived by an intentional distortion of the facts.  This current administration deliberately lie and mislead the entire nation.  I personally am ashamed of our actions against a sovereign nation on the assumption of WMD's and Al Queda connections.  Neither of which were true.

It is also clear that there is a political party that has the best interests of the American people in mind with the economic and health policies it wihses to employ.  I certainly don't hear any such thing from the Republican party that even touches on the issues that affects all of us.  

May God judge us for our insolence and forgive us by allowing to heal the wrongs we have created in the last long eight exhaustive years.
Hey,

It's August 4th already. Chop Chop ! Where the hell are you guys?
how can a national political party,who in the past have claimed to have human rights as a focus, say that the war in Iraq is/was a "blunder"? This is a massive over sight of the Dems. They hate Bush so much they forget the war has freed an entire country from the oppression of a murderous dictator. And brought democracy to a region where it is badly needed.
I am a white working class union member and veteran and I'm voting for Obama.  His judgement, intellect and inspirational message is what America needs.  Not more of the politics of the past...divisive, military force first diplomacy and immediate gratification.  Vote Obama.
Well you have to hand it to George(I'm number one) Bush. He is number one at something.
The invasion and then occupation of Iraq was the single stupidist decision ever made by any president.
Was a copy of this draft available for review?
well, that's a bold statement: pointing out the elephant in the room...that's kinda been general oppinion for the last 4+years
Strategic blunder is definitely an understatement.
Bush's War has been the biggest foreign policy mistake that the U.S. has made in decades.  His war will inspire terrorists for many years to come.
He will deservedly go down in history as one of our worst presidents of all time.
Gee , all I wanted was a free $1,000. That way I could add a little can meat to my dogs hard chow meal. Didn't expect all the hoopla over it <smile>. Thanks for the comments Anna Molly.

Iraq, yes, a big mistake. No problem for the Dems saying so in their platform. Two issues they have to be mindful of howerver.

One, some of those Dems voted to give GWB approval to invade Iraq. They need to somehow be held just as accountable as any Republican who voted for the invasion. Note: I am not saying "war". This is, was, no war. Never has been. This is a policing action. Regarding our fight with terrorism. That requires international law enforcement cooperation and tactics to resolve.

Two, after making a quick point that the Iraq invasion was a bad move, and a very bad decision, the Dems need to be sure and state in detail (with some apparent study of the situation and with honesty) where do we go from here. The American people already agree the invasion was a grave error of leadership decision making. No need beating a dead horse to .........What they want to hear now is some well-thought out plans as to how we get out of this mess. I will say it is time to bring our troops home, from both Iraq and Afghanistan, and begin taking care of out own country and people. And please don't come back with the comment "we have to fight them there". That comment never made sense.  We have some serious issues facing us here at home that will require the new administration's full attention without the distractions of a policing action in Iraq and Afghanistan.    
And that's news? I think we've all known Iraq has been a strategic blunder for years - even Republicans, though some won't admit it.

The question is how big a blunder. Is the biggest ever made by the U.S. and how would we define "biggest?" That's the interesting conversation.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1244331

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google