ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Obama talks religion at forum

Posted: Sunday, August 17, 2008 10:13 AM by Mark Murray

From NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
LAKE FOREST, CA -- Obama talked about Iraq, abortion, the Supreme Court, and his greatest moral failure during an hour-long televised talk on faith and politics with pastor and best-selling author Rick Warren here at Saddleback Church.

McCain also attended the event, but he spoke with Warren separately. After Obama’s hour was over, the presumptive Republican nominee came on stage and greeted his rival. The two men shook hands and gave each other a pat on the back as the crowd applauded.

“We believe in the separation of church and state, but we do not believe in the separation of faith and politics, because faith is just a worldview and everybody has some kind of worldview and it’s important to know what they are,” said Warren, the author of the mega-hit book “A Purpose Driven Life,” at the opening of the forum.

The diverse crowd, which the church said reached 2,200 people in the sanctuary and another 4,200 watching from satellite locations, applauded throughout the forum and laughed frequently as Obama tackled questions from identifying his biggest moral failure and a time he broke with his party to achieve something for the common good -- he cited his work with McCain on ethics reform -- to his views on marriage, evil, and how to tackle global problems like genocide and human trafficking. Notably, both men were tieless.

Much of the discussion involved issues the presidential hopeful has addressed extensively throughout the long primary campaign and on the stump since. In fact, as he began a section on domestic policy, Warren made a point of asking the senator not to recycle his stump speech in response. Obama responded by joking that he had been campaigning for a long time and his answers throughout the event were careful and hit many of his usual political themes.

For instance, when asked to talk about the most gut-wrenching decision he had ever had to make, Obama used the opportunity to point to an issue that helped him make a name for himself. "I think the opposition to the war in Iraq was as tough a decision as I've had to make -- not only because there were political consequences but also because Saddam Hussein was a real bad person and there was no doubt that he meant America ill. But I was firmly convinced at the time that we did not have strong evidence of weapons of mass destruction."

The senator cited welfare reform as the most significant issue in the last 10 years on which he had changed his mind, explaining that he had worried the reform efforts -– which sought to move people off welfare rolls to work -– would be a disaster, but that it had turned out much better than he had anticipated and he was convinced that work must be a centerpiece of any social policy.

He said his teen drug use was his greatest moral failure and not doing enough to remedy inequalities was the country’s greatest moral failure. He also spoke several times about the importance of humility and he talked about what his faith in Jesus Christ means to him on a daily basis. "I believe that Jesus Christ died for my sins and that I am redeemed through him. That is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily basis," he said. "I know that I don't walk alone."

Obama has been able to appeal to some religious voters in part, because he seems more open to talking about his faith than McCain does. He has written about finding his faith as a young man and about his work with churches while a community organizer on the streets of Chicago’s South Side. Still, for many conservative Christians, the senator’s views on issues like abortion make him a tough sell.

When Warren asked at what point a baby gets human rights, Obama did not provide a timeframe and instead focused on finding common ground, which he defined as working across ideological lines to reduce the number of abortions -- a goal he said he had inserted into the Democratic Party platform.

"Whether you're looking at it from a theoretical or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade," Obama began. "If you believe that life begins at conception and you are consistent in that belief, then I can't argue with you, because that is a core issue of faith for you. What I can do is say, are there ways that we can work together to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies?"

Two interesting moments came when the pastor asked Obama to define “rich." After joking with Warren about the pastor having sold over 25 million books, Obama said families making up to $150,000 were middle class, if not poor -- depending on where they live -- while those with incomes of $250,000 or more were well off, though he did not use the word “rich”.

When asked which sitting Supreme Court justice he would not have nominated, Obama named first Clarence Thomas and then Antonin Scalia, saying he disagreed with both ideologically and that Thomas had not been a "strong enough jurist or legal thinker" at the time of his nomination.

Warren told the audience at the beginning of the event that the senators would be asked identical questions so that the audience could “compare apples to apples” and said they had “safely placed Sen. McCain in a cone of silence” to prevent his receiving any advantage by being second.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

On CNN, they pointed out that John McCain voted for all the justices he said he would not have appointed. Were you aware of that First Read?
What really was clear about this forum was how McCain constantly referred to his prison years. In my mind I eliminated those years and wondered whether the rest of McCains story is just one big blank and playing the political game.

McCain cares so much about Americans that he has vetoed the bills we need to make things more equitable.

I came away with a fear of the Hawk in McCain. He seems concentrated on war. It is all that he knows and it is obvious.

Barack Obama is a focused listener. This was a spiritual and religious forum. He treated it as such and he showed us his authentic self.  Barack is truly a person of deep faith and caring for the American people.

Obama talked from his heart and his intellect, Mc Cain gave his stump speech,  his war hero stories ets. This was a partisan audience . The public should not be allowed to attend these events. Their reactions influences the commentary. Why was Mc Cain allowed to get away with his stump speech responses.???????
Good grief.  This article is the worst show of  bias that I have ever read.  For those who are sincerely interest in the forum, I suggest that they watch the ABC, CBS or CNN site.  If nothing else these let you know that there was "two" people that participated last night!  Only then can you read the pros and cons for each.
Obama did very well and it is clear he is a thoughful person who weighs what the issues are.  McCain on the other hand solidified for me my concerns that he is nothing but a war monger...calling Iraq the central gound on war on terror...how can someone who claims foreign policy experience keep making this dillusional claim??

Let''s us get the vote out in NOvember so we can help Obama win.
I shudder to think about what the Supreme Court will look like and do to us if McCain is elected.  Antonin Scalia is an arrogant SOB.  He should have to spend some time in the neighborhoods of D.C. where he says handguns should be allowed.  At least he was not named Chief Justice.  Clarence Thomas is an abomination and is way over his head.  Alito and Roberts are sell-outs to corporations, the God of the Republican party.
Well I guess in his cone of silence he spent it rehearsing his answers.. Because he surely sounded rehearsed.  Thank you Athena for just reporting information from the forum and allowing people to make their own assessment and not providing your opinion.. I am disappointed that people tried to make this like a debate.. It was a conversation, not a campaign stop.. I got the feeling with Barack that we were just talking as was the intent of the forum, so I thought.. With McCain it just felt like I have seen this picture before.. oh yeah his stump speech..For this to be a faith based forum, I only heard McCain speak maybe 1 sentence about his FAITH.. better yet maybe a few words.. How is that a WIN.. we didn't find out anything about how he felt about his faith and how its applied in his daily life.
Chill vs. War..

Do we need four more years of believing in the boogey man is just around the corner somewhere...or do we need time to really pursue the injustice correctly...

McCain is looking for a fight under every rock..and I'm sure he'll find one...the only problem with that boogey man justice system is we just might create more enemies then friends in the long run...
We need good sound judgment and intelligence and he has never stated how we can achieve that goal...all I see is from McCain is a, "shoot first and let GOD sort them out", attitude and testament...
I'm not prepared to support that mistake again..Are you?

Obama'08
Obama didn’t attack Clarence Thomas  on his  experience.  Obama  attacked  him on his lack of strong intellectual intuitiveness  as a jurorist.
We watched this "Slanted towards McCain" forum. McCain was able to answer some questions before they were out of Warren's mouth. All stump replies. Never paused to reflect like Obama. Avoided answering questions about his faith by telling age old Vietnam stories.
How could anyone want another ignorant Republican for the next four years when Bush has done immeasurable damage for the last eight? How soon before McCain's temper gets us into another war - note Russia/Georgia?
It is my hope that epople will see MCCain for what he is: MCCAIN IS NOT THE ONE.
I think Obama wavered at first, but got into a groove about halfway through. I think he did pretty well considering the venue, questions, and evangelical audience in general seemed to favor McCain.

http://www.rodneyhopper.com
my words
McCain was war, war, war, POW, Islamic extremist, stories, no substance, jokes, nothing to prove (mostly conservative evangelical audience), didn’t answer questions fully, man of few words, oh and vote for me because Im a veteran (guilt trip alert).

Obama was Jesus, god, christian, personal, intellectual, in-depth, substance, a little more serious, nothing to lose (evangelicals aren’t his base, most aren’t going to vote for him), bible quote, sincere, honest, talks a lot, answered questions, man of a lot of words, oh and values

One was more honest and the other was more rehearest guess which one was which
http://sensico.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/faith-forum-sincerity-versus-stump-speech/
The image of the 2 together was like the another I've seen. It was Obama visiting a retirement home. Obama looks rested and alive. The race is wearing on Magoo. And while I admire his tenacity, he needs a vacation.
When Obama was asked when does life begin he said, "Whether you're looking at it from a theoretical or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade." I read Obama answer as not seeing himself as being omnipotent– his answer was humble.  He was leaving that to a greater power!
I thought Obama gave very thoughtful answer's that actualy gave me insight into the man's true self. Mccain on the other hand seemed to give indirect answer's that did not allow you to view his soul. Mccain seemed to just give stump speech's and and talking point's. I did not really get any feeling for how his faith guide's him and I thought that was the idea of this forum.
Identical questions?  Not so.  McCain continually asked himself soft questions and then answered them.  Rick Warren was not exactly in control.  Tom from Spokane
When Obama was asked when does life begin he said, "Whether you're looking at it from a theoretical or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade." I read Obama answer as not seeing himself as being omnipotent– his answer was humble.  He was leaving that to a greater power!
When asked which sitting Supreme Court justice he would not have nominated, Obama named first Clarence Thomas and then Antonin Scalia, saying he disagreed with both ideologically and that Thomas had not been a "strong enough jurist or legal thinker" at the time of his nomination.  He did speak to Thomas’s experience.  Obama  attacked  him on his lack of strong intellectual intuitiveness  as a jurist.
Obama as usual seemed arrogant and gave roundabout answers to many questions. He did not appeal to the Evangelical community, in my view, at all. He also did not address critical issues about his relationship with Reverend Wright and his church's foundation on Black Liberation Theology.
What they didn't mention is that it seemed like McCain got some advance warning on the questions. I'm going to give Warren the benefit of the doubt, but there's no reason someone in the audience - perhaps Cindy, if she was in the first row - could have been texting back to McCain. But when McCain asks "when are you going to ask me about Supreme Court justices" - how does he know that Warren discussed that with Obama?
I was surprise to learn that the most the most gut-wrenching decision McCain ever had to make was not leaving his sick wife.  She had be faithful and waited for his return from war.
"theoretical or a scientific perspective"

I think it was a theological.........
McCain's answers showed that he is a protege of George W. Bush. Clearly, he:
- reads from a script
- panders to his constituency
- sees things in black and white
- "doesn't do nuance"
- favors anecdotes over statistics in forming his opinions
- fails to realize that decisions are for "what to do", not "what is true"
- is decisive about what is true and false regardless of facts
At best, the diversity in the crowd was slim and not readily apparent to viewers at home.
The junior senator should start by taking Biology 101 and Economics 1A in order to think through his assertions.
Talk about one side of the story. Obama had a few straight answers, McCain seem to be quicker to respnd. The answers were a little straighter. I think it was a good forum, Very informative. If we had a dozen forums of this type we could do away B.S we have today and it would level the playing field for every one.
I believe that Sen. McCain answered his questions before they were completely asked, leaving some doubt he
 was prepared for the questions before being asked.
Last night, Obama proved that he is an utter coward when he sidestepped the question on abortion. When asked when human rights should begin for an unborn person, he merely claimed that we should cut down on unwanted children.

In fact, his voting record, and his A+ rating with Planned Parenthood, Emily's list, and NARAL prove that he has no regard whatever for the innocent children that want only to be born and cared for and loved. His shrill vitriol advocates total access to abortion at all stages.

Think about it: he defends even so called "partial birth abortion" which involves puncturing the head of a child so its brains can be sucked out.

Murder looks like murder, doesn't it? And he assents to it.
"above my pay grade." on Abortion.
It's not above ours Obama.
Make up your mind.
He is lying.Obama has voted strongly for abortion across the board.
I was horrified to see that the two men who are running for president of the United States, the most powerful man in the world, publicly appeared in a widely televised broadcast where their "religious faith" was put on display by questions from a religious leader - a pastor. As president we need a true leader, a statesman, a man (or woman) who knows a lot about management, economics, a bit of science, and the law as it applies to the United States government. And it would help if the president, as commander-in-chief, also knew a bit about military matters. It might even have been appropriate for the two candidates to have been asked questions about economics by a Nobel Laureate in Economics. But to have been asked questions relating to their "religious faith" by a religious leader is a travesty.
I think Obama should be applauded for taking part in this event.  He was obviously appearing before a crowd which was known to have more of the basic beliefs of McCain and which was pre-inclined to be pro-McCain.  Both parties did well, but I will risk the anger of many when I say that I believe McCain is playing on his captive days a bit too much in this campaign.  He is a true war hero and gave, and continues to give, unselfishly to our country.  However, what he suffered thru during those dreadful years does not necessarily give him credencials for the Presidency.
Frankly, I don't give a rat's patooty what these two believe - that's their own personal faith, none of my business - and shouldn't be a factor for election by any stretch of the imagination. But, now that they've given proper obeisance to the right wing fanatic nut jobs, can we please move on to what really matters? I want to know what they're going to do about the economy, the housing crisis, healthcare, education, etc. To be honest, after last night's faux-faith fiasco, I would be hesitant to vote for either one of them. It makes me furious that people like Rick Warren and his ilk have completely hi-jacked the political process, and I think our founding fathers turned over in their graves years ago when religion became a needed attribute to gain public office.
Barack showed that he thinks before acting and that he will lead the country to a better place
Did Mc.Cain get a hint on the questions? The suprem court question was not up yet but Mc.Cain ask at what point would it .
The Forum saddened me, left me sleepless. If I live in Seattle, that might be funny. There are two things that bothered me.

One: Why is it necessary to drag religion into our politics? I understand that forum such as this can show us the moral ground upon which the candidates walk, but can't we infer their beliefs - true beliefs - by their actions?

Two: It disheartens me when many in the media jumped onto the McCain Express after last night. Why is it because McCain comes up with quick, blunt answers, it makes him look presidential? And because Obama thinks before he speaks in order to view the whole of something rather than just one part, he is not presidential?

For the last 8 years we have had a president shooting from the hip, not listening to others, mired in his own ideology. Do we want more of the same? Obama wants to see a whole issue, every side and opinion before making decisions. And this is bad because?

There is strife around the world. Russia, China, Middle East. Do we want a president that will make a snap decision, give a good sound bite to make us feel strong and superior? Or,, before sending others' sons and daughters to war, do we want a president who will gather information, contemplate what is best for America, and then make a decision.

I fear that the Bush years has made most Americans dumb - and dumber. Lincoln was wrong. You can fool all of the people all of the time.

And those in the media are responsible for the huge dumbing down of America.

Keep up the good work people. Because if McCain is elected, he will drag us all down into hell trying to get Bin Laden at those gates.

I don't know why I write these, they are never posted. I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone. Is there anyone else out there who feels the same way?
I can't get over your bias articles and reporting in this election! I am not a strong supporter of McCain but you headline B. H. Obama and then say "McCain also attended"! This is why MSNBC is blocked on all of my TV's.  OBama is such a loser I guess that is why you support him.  I watch the interviews and Rich Warner did an outstanding job.  I am more convienced that B. H. Obama is unfit to lead our country.
There is a general consensus that  Obama answer were thoughtful.    But when has it become a liability in our politics for someone “ to explain himself too much” and to go “out of his way not to offend folks who disagree with him?”.
How refreshing it is for Mr. Warren to provide a public forum for the candidates that attempts to understand their views, without the  mentality that too  often  features a journalist's ego that wants to play  "gotcha" with the candidates.   I'm not at all an evangelical, but I much respect Mr. Warren's effort to truly understand these men. Selection of a President is too important to all of us to be playing egotistical games.
Take the very  first question Warren posed to both candidates: who are three people you'll depend on for wisdom in the presidency.   How does McCain depend on Patraeus, Lewis, and Whitman, for wisdom.  He might admire them as people, but to depend on them for wisdom is quite different.  Did McCain not understand the question?  Obama's answer came across as more authentic  or was a very personal.  He talked about his wife and grandmother and other people who have held elected political positions.
The only religion Obama knows is from sitting in that pew at Wrights church for 20 years. In other words, he knows none at all.
Did Obama talk about the teachings to his daughters by Reverend Wright? Did they learn the Wright things?
What an immaturely-written and clearly slanted article. This particular item has a counterpart article about McCain elsewhere on this site. Read the above with the corresponding piece on McCain and decide for yourself. They both could have been written by a high school journalism student. If they had been combined into one editorial, the slant is clearly seen. Just so you can read it without having to search, here's the link: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/17/1270967.aspx

For an thought-provoking alternative (yes, it's a conservative view, but I believe one needs to hear from both sides to be well-rounded), try the editorial in National Review. Quite remarkable for being posted within twelve hours; the level of writing is noticeable. Click here to read that one: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTBjN2RkY2Y3ODZhYmRmYTZjYTI1NTQ4ZGNkM2Y2YmU=
[Obama said families making up to $150,000 were middle class, if not poor -- depending on where they live -- while those with incomes of $250,000 or more were well off, though he did not use the word “rich]

What's the matter Barack - you didn't have a poll in front of you so you knew where the lines where drawn for that particular day?
After watching Obama, I think I know about the same as I did before he started.  He has positions, sorta.  He thinks things are tough.  We're all going to have to hunker down.  I felt that after watching McCain, I had an understanding of why he was an outsider Republican from the start - voting against his hero's stand because of principle.  Adopted children, regret and remorse over divorce, and a sincere believable stance that our best days are still ahead.  I struggle to see what appeal Obama has for the undecided unless you chose to dial down your sensitivity to current issues.
Just watched a reply of the debate. Does Obama always stutter that badly?
Pastor Rick Warren asked big questions on big subjects. Obama and McCain were forced to call on everything they had — the things they have done and learned throughout their lives. And the fact is, John McCain has lived a much bigger life than Barack Obama. That’s not a slam at Obama, McCain has lived a much bigger life than most people. But it still made Obama look small in comparison. McCain was the clear winner of the night.
When I first heard the announcement about this event, I thought; "Why would Obama (Daniel) want to visit the Lion's den?" Clearly, people here in Orange County are above being ignorant, disrespectful and overtly racist.  However, they are extremely ultra conservative and this was, is and will remain "John McCain" territory.

Last night indicated why supporting Barack is viewed with such disdain.  I like thoughtful responses.  I like critical thinking.  I like applying logic and analysis prior to taking action.  

I'm sorry it just appears Sen. McCain's approach is "we have a bigger military and more weapons, kill em all let God sort out"

Does it see that way to anyone else?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1270952

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google