ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



McCain call spurs other questions

Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:50 PM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC/NJ's Adam Aigner-Treworgy and NBC's Aram Roston and NBC/NJ's Athena Jones
On a conference call intended to discuss recent reports that a foreign policy advisor for the Obama campaign met with Syria’s foreign minister last month in Damascus, McCain senior foreign policy advisor Randy Scheunemann and Rudy Giuliani were instead peppered with questions about their personal histories and McCain’s VP selection process.

The call began with the two surrogates railing against Daniel Kurtzer, an advisor to the Obama campaign and a former American ambassador to Israel under the Bush administration and Egypt in both the Clinton and Bush administrations. The McCain campaign charged that Kurtzer should have disclosed the meeting earlier and seized on a New York Sun quote, in which Kurtzer, reportedly said, "None of us thought we were being used or abused, but we will see over time."

The Obama campaign said Kurtzer was attending a conference as a "private citizen" and was not sent by Obama.

The first question came from Ron Kampeas from the JTA, a Jewish news wire service, who asked if there was an “imbalance” on the call due to both participants foreign lobbying and legal involvement. First Kampeas asked about Giuliani’s legal dealings with Citgo, the Chavez government and the Saudis -- all of which Giuliani said were “factually inaccurate.”

Then the he began to ask about Scheunemann’s extensive lobbying involvement with the country of Georgia when he was abruptly disconnected. Scheunemann nonetheless addressed a portion of his question, saying he “got the gist of his statement if not his question.”

“First of all, I’m not a paid lobbyist for Georgia, I haven’t been for some time,” Scheunemann said -- he stopped working for Georgia earlier this year, according to the AP. “But the difference between being a lobbyist and going on covert trips that are only disclosed later through aggressive media reporting is night and day. The only reason everybody can talk about what business activities I’ve done in the past is because it’s been fully disclosed. It’s been fully addressed by this campaign.”

Scheunemann's lobbying firm Orion Strategies has been paid more than $800,000 since 2004 by the Government of Georgia, according to records at the Department of Justice Office of Foreign Agents Registration. Scheunemann himself terminated his role in March 2008, the records show, and suspended his work as a lobbyist. Still, experts have alleged there is a conflict of interest for him, especially as he is still a vocal supporter for Georgia, and it's current government.

American University ethics professor James Thurber said in an interview with NBC News last week  that Scheuneneman's role is problematic.

"It puts McCain in a position where he is not hearing all the positions he could be hearing," Thurber said. "It is a conflict of interest."  

Thurber says even if Scheunemann no longer talks to his old company, there is a problem.

"The queston is where do the loyalties lie when you have an economic relationship with somone for several years," he said, adding that cutting off ties is not enough. "Even though you say you have a firewall between the lobbying firm and the campaign. There's not a firewall in a person's soul."

But in the conference call, Scheunemann said that the charge that his relationship with Georgia is inappropriate “continues to be pushed around by both the Obama campaign and public relations firms that are in the employ of the Russians.” 

“It is no secret, in fact it’s known openly that I worked for the Georgians,” Scheunemann said. “It was a secret until this story broke that Ambassador Kurtzer before he accompanied Senator Obama on his Middle East trip was in Syria talking to senior Syrian officials.”

With regard to Kurtzer's meeting, Obama foreign policy adviser Susan Rice said there was "nothing but falsehood and distortion" in the McCain campaign's comments about the visit to Syria.

She added that whilie the ambassador was there, he had made comments -- that Syria should make progess in its negotiations with Israel -- that she hoped McCain would agree with. 

Rice went on to argue that it was hypocritical for McCain's campaign to criticize the trip, since the Arizona senator himself had traveled to Syria in 1984 and met with its "terrorist-sponsoring" then-president a year after the bombing of an American Marine barracks in Lebanon.

The tough questions weren't just on foreign policy on the conference call. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell asked the pro-choice former mayor about his thoughts on McCain selecting a pro-choice vice presidential nominee.

“It would seem to me the Republican Party is not, as far as I can tell -- and I traveled to thousands of places last year -- a one-issue party, and that would just be one issue among many that would have to be evaluated by the party,” Giuliani said. “But I believe the party will support Senator McCain’s choice.”

Giuliani said that the most important factor in the VP decision is “a person that would allow us to sleep at night knowing that we had selected someone who could immediately be president of the United States."

Before the questioning began, Giuliani had some harsh words for what Kurtzer’s actions say about Obama’s foreign policy.

“If Sen. Obama is truly going to bring transparency to Washington, this is surely no way to do it,” Giuliani said. “And maybe this is a playing out his negotiating with dictators and people like that without preconditions.”

According to the Sun, Kurtzer was acting in his capacity as a member of the American Bar Association's Rule of Law Initiative, and not as an advisor to Obama. Yet Giuliani contended that Kurtzer’s actions prove Obama’s inexperience.

“We live with many, many challenges, foreign and domestic,” Giuliani said. “We need an experienced person, not someone like Senator Obama who is one of the least experienced candidates for president in the last hundred years, if not the least experienced. Beyond that, his actions as a candidate seem to demonstrate that.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I think Scheunemann has become just too much of a liability with his connections to Georgia and his overall lobbying record. McCain can easily jettison him with no trouble now that he's the frontrunner and get rid of the potential headache it would cause down the stretch.

http://www.political-buzz.com/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

that will be the funniest line up on TV!!!
Even thought I don't like the idea, I guess it is time for the Obama campaign to start playing the same game the the Republicans are playing. We need to win back the White House and put our government back in the hands of "We The People".

Go BO
AT LEAST THE MEDIA IS STARTING TO ASK THERE BELOVED MCSAME SOME TOUGH QUSTIONS/ COULD THE LOVE AFFAIR BE OVER?
McCain is warmonger!

He not participate in Vietnam war.  He sat on sideline and got caned on head and neck.  

Plus he eat bamboo shute for 5 year.  
Funny how the GOP all criticize Obama for his lack of experience when Lincoln, probably the most revered Republican Presidents had just as little (if not less).  It was nice of Giuliani to qualify his "least experienced" statement with "in the last 100 years. Typical political garbage.  

I'll say this much, I can see for certain what McCain offers, and I don't want it.  I believe I know what Obama offers and I would like to have that for our country.  So while he may not have much of a record to run on (at least a political record), I'll take my chances with Obama.  As the mantra of 2008 is , we need change.
It is absolutely amazing who John McCain has representing him. It seems ever one of them has a shady or questionable background. The country needs some fresh faces in DC who understand the concept of personal integrity.
So let me see if I'm following the mccain campaign line here....

It is ok for mccain to go to iraq and preen for the cameras (remember the helicopters protecting him in the "safe" marketplace)but obama can't...

It is ok for mccain to "dispatch" two of his toadies to georgia but another sitting senator called obama cannot...

It is ok for mccain to besmirch anothers patriotism but he expects us all to genuflect to his put up war hero status...

It is ok for rudy911 to be in charge of new york security on 911 (how did that work for you folks anyway?) and be advising mccain on "security"...

By the way...will all of you mccain supporters send your kids and grandkids to get killed or maimed in his wars? Just wondering
Mccain is a lying jerk! He drew Obama into that unheard of reverand from Calif. format! What a joke! McCain leads in no poll in America get over it GE! WE HATE HIM AND GEORGE BUSH! IF YOU BACK HIM WE WILL HATE YOU TOO!!!
When will the press start to cover McCain's customer service to the electorate (an elected position is nothing more that an customer service one)?  What has McCain done to improve the lives of Native Americans?  He has done nothing.  The native people of this country don't have indoor plumbing or any utilities in their homes. He has served on the committee that deals with our Indian Nations for several years and his record is empty (casinos are not serving the tribal nations of America).

I have personal experience with his HORRIBLE customer service skills, he has NONE!
Anything to divert attention from your poor candidate, right Obama supporters. Don't look how much our candidate (Obama) stinks, we'll manufactor something so that you'll focus on the other guy.

Obama is just so transparent. He just looking sillier by the day.
Gina Thomas, Albany NY (Sent Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:49 PM)
******************************************************
WOW! That is the most prime example of the pot calling the kettle black I have ever heard. Who focuses all there energy on the other candidate? Who spends all there time calling Obama a celebrity? Comparing him to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton? Was swiftboating invented by the Dems? You are the one supporting the party of Karl Rove and you say we are the ones who divert attention from policy discussions?
Just look at your post. It says it all. No knowledge. No factual evidence. Not a shred of truth. Just anger and finger pointing. I will ask you the same question I ask all of you right-wingers.
Why do you support McCain? Health care policy. Economic policy. National defense and international diplomacy. What is it about his senate voting record that attracts you to vote for him? All of us stupid liberal Obama supporters would love to know.
Don't trust McCain period.  He's got an itchy finger on the trigger.  He'd shoot innocent people if they were in the way.  Oops sorry temper got me.
Anyone that trust RUDY BOY really has poor judgement.
Hmmmm....that must mean McCain's alleged good judgement resides only in his own mind.
I am very happy to hear that at least a couple of reporters where actually doing their job and asking a couple of involved questions instead of just taking stenography from the McCain campaign and reporting their distortions.

I'm not surprised that one reporter who was asking a very pertinent question was abruptly cut off.  The Republicans have decided long ago that they owed nobody including the AMerican people any answers.
Unfortunately that reporter won't be invited to take part in any more conference calls by the McCain campaign.  
He probably didn't understand the rules and thought he was going to be a reporter rather than the McCain Campaign's secretary.
Ladies and Gentleman - at a McCain town hall meeting today the "D" word came up and he said he is open to that. DRAFT. He needs more of our families, friends, etc. to support Iraq war, Afghan. war, Pakistan war, Russian war and of course Iran war.

I refuse to send my sons to any of these wars. Time to move to Canada.  DRAFT Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran. This man is war hungry - it's going to be so bad that so many of you will wish that Bush was back. America will no longer be the same if McCain becomes President. DRAFT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cindy McCained lied about meeting Mother Theresa.  They never met.  Ever.  

Lies everywhere and the media thinks it's funny.

Too busy reporting the important stuff....
GEORGIA ADMIT THEY INVADED FIRST SEE INTERVIEW

Georgia Wants U.S. to Restrain Russia

Sunday, Aug. 10, 2008 By VIVIENNE WALT: TIME
Five days after Georgian troops stormed into South Ossetia to reclaim control of the tiny breakaway territory, they were in retreat on Sunday after being battered by Russian forces. But the Russians have not confined themselves to pushing Georgian forces out of South Ossetia, and ongoing Russian attacks have hit close to the Georgian capital and along its coastline. Hundreds of South Ossetians are dead and thousands have fled their homes, some sheltering in decrepit schools with no electricity or water. Georgia is a close ally of the U.S. and has a large troop contingent in Iraq. Its government is hoping that President Bush and other Western leaders will lean on Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to call off his troops. But that hope might be in vain, given the limits of Western leverage over Moscow, and the need for Russian cooperation on Iran. Georgia's Foreign Minister Eka Tkeshelashvili spoke to TIME about her country's calamitous week and what comes next:
TIME: Didn't you walk into Russia's trap? Russia provoked Georgia, and you responded, and then they launched an all-out attack. Was there no other way out here?

Tkeshelashvili: We have been forced into this situation. There was shelling of Georgian villages. We sent a special envoy. We tried to communicate that all we wanted was negotiations. Then when the Russian equipment and armed forces started moving into South Ossetia — at that point we had no other choice but to respond, otherwise we would have stood by idly watching people die on the ground.

TIME: Why is South Ossetia such a key contest for Russia and Georgia?

Tkeshelashvili: We feared that Russia would do everything possible to stop any prospect for the success of Georgia joining NATO. That is the ultimate goal that Russia had, and still has. We are a former Soviet country which is becoming fully independent and oriented to Western development. That challenges every notion of the Russian Federation, that their sphere of influence over former Soviet countries should be very firm. We are getting closer to Europe, closer to NATO. If we are successful, then other former Soviet countries will follow that path. It is not only Georgia that is concerned. It is much bigger.
TIME: So what can the United States and Europe do?
Tkeshelashvili: We are hopeful. Europe and the U.S. have extremely powerful leverage in persuading Russia that it has to stop its aggression in Georgia, and it has to find what conditions there are for genuine lasting, sustaining ceasefire and then security for this part of the Georgian state. The United Nations and United States has to stop Russian aggression. If Russia is successful then we are facing the new world rules of behavior and coexistence of sovereign states.

TIME: That still leaves Georgia wanting full control over South Ossetia.

Tkeshelashvili: Territories are not the end goal. We want to consolidate George for development, democracy, and to be part of Europe and NATO. That is our goal.

TIME: What is your major objection to the South Ossetia and Abkhazia separatists?
Tkeshelashvili: We have to be clear what these movements are. In South Ossetia, most of the government officials are active members of the military and security forces of the Russian Federation. South Ossetia and Abkhazia were multiethnic communities in which Georgians might have been in the majority, but there were also large communities of Greeks, Jews, Ukrainians, and Armenians there. Now both territories have basically an apartheid regime. They are ethnically cleansed territories where some remnants of previous ethnic communities are oppressed with the help from Russia. I just was in the village of Gori. I saw with my own eyes the level of destruction, a woman dead among the destroyed buildings. It's a humanitarian disaster.
TIME: You are recalling all the Georgian soldiers from Iraq. Is this a big blow to your relationship with the US?

Tkeshelashvili: We are being bombed. Russia is a big state, we are a small state. So we have to mobilize all the forces we have.







Obama doesn't want to have wars, Vote Smart? Ah, so that's why he pledged on air to cut tens of billions from missile defense spending, cut billions from Future Combat Systems programs that are the future of defending our troops on the ground, and wants to completely disregard nuclear deterrence as a defense strategy assuming everyone else will too. So Obama not starting wars around the world goes hand in hand with his belief that the military doesn't need to be state of the art. Because what are our most notable adversaries working on improving? Missile technology. So while they're improving what they have, we'll be dismantling our resistance to them. I'm OK with not starting wars. I'm NOT OK with a commander-in-chief who doesn't care about the well being of his soldiers OR his allies, because even if we NEVER START ANOTHER WAR, war will find its way to America and we may not be prepared.
Obama is the least experienced candidate to ever run for the Presidency.  He will say and do anything to get votes.  Tranparency is not a word in his vocabulary.  Sooner or later all his lies will be exposed. McCain08; Hillary 2012!!
McCAIN RUSSIAN LOBBYISTS CONFUSE GEORGIA DEFENSE

MCCAIN HAS RUSSIAN AND GEORGIAN LOBBYIST IN HIS CAMPAIGN;  CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND PLAYING TWO SIDE AGAINST THE OTHER

In the wake of John McCain's forceful rebuke of Russia for sending invading forces into Georgia, scrutiny has been placed on the role McCain's chief foreign policy guru, Randy Scheunemann, played lobbying on behalf of the former Soviet country.
Asked whether Scheunemann's financial ties have influenced his hard anti-Russian stance, McCain deployed a curious form of political self-defense. I am pleased, he told USA Today, to have friends "who also believe in freedom and democracy." Earlier, McCain spokeswoman Nichole Wallace took an even more grandiose approach, declaring of Scheunemann: "We're proud of anyone who has worked on the side of angels in fledgling democracies."

The defense, as Jonathan Martin wrote for Politico, amounts to: "He was supporting the good guys." And while, in this instance, McCain may on the side of public opinion, such a line of defense puts his campaign in a tough spot when it comes to the lobbying work of other aides and campaign financiers. After all, if it's acceptable for Scheunemann to represent Georgia because Georgia is "the side of angels," it would seem that by McCain's own standards, the Senator frowns upon the work his associates have done on behalf of Russia or major Russian institutions.

According to lobbying records, several of McCain's top strategists and fundraisers have been paid good money to advance Russian interests in the United States. For instance, The Washington Group, a firm that employees several associates of the Arizona Senator, has lobbied the United States Congress on behalf of Russia through a subcontractor called Integrated Solutions Group.

Susan Molinari, a former New York Congresswoman who serves on the Women For McCain Steering Committee, is the Chairman and CEO of the firm. McCain's former economic adviser, Carlos Bonilla, is a lobbyist with them. So is Melissa Edwards, a big-time fundraiser for the presumptive Republican nominee. Indeed Edwards, according to a Department of Justice filing, traveled to Moscow for a U.S.-Russia Business Council meeting in October 2007. That trip was directed by the PR firm Ketchum, which owns The Washington Group.
The Washington Group is not the only lobbyist shop with McCain connections that has worked on behalf of Russian interests. In June, the New York Times reported that the firm owned by McCain campaign chief Rick Davis had worked to prop up Ukrainian politico Viktor Yanukovich, who was opposed by the Bush administration but backed by then Russian president Vladimir Putin. McCain's aides denied that Davis was involved on that issue, but the Times wrote that officials with the National Security Council went so far as to confront McCain about concern that Davis was undermining U.S. interests.

In June 2003, meanwhile, McCain campaign strategist Charlie Black's firm, BKSH, signed a contract to lobby on behalf of the Russian Information Agency (the state's major news vehicle) through Hannaford Enterprises, a public relations firm. Black personally signed the contract, which stated that BKHS would "provide HEI with counsel regarding RIGA's communications strategy relating to the United States Congress, the Executive branch of the U.S. government and U.S. political entities." The deal lasted half a year and earned BKHS $65,000.

Then there is Charles Ryan, the CEO of Deutsche Bank Russia. A member of the Senator's London Finance Committee, Ryan co-hosted a $25,000-per-head fundraiser with Cindy McCain in late June of this year. He is also a major backer of Vladimir Putin. In July 2006, Ryan penned an International Herald Tribune op-ed assuaging concerns over the then-prime minister. Years earlier, he said the Kremlin wasn't too powerful but rather too weak. When Putin left office, Ryan called him a patriot and said only minor changes were needed for the country.

To be sure, McCain has been a consistent, if not adamant, critic of Russia. And the work his advisers did on behalf of that country seemed to have little influence on him during the recent outbreak of hostilities in Georgia. But if McCain defends the work of Scheunemann by saying he was on the side of good, it would be nice to know his feelings about the lobbying done by aides on the other side of the fight.

The McCain campaign did not immediately return requests for comment






If he is no longer being paid does that mean is it no longer true that "we are all Georgians"?
Here we go.  Here comes the "now we can sleep safely" crapola.  If McWarmongerer is president and has lackies like Rudy nine-eleven, Joe Lie-berman, and Graham running around the white house then none of us will sleep easy for 4 years.

People must be insane to vote for these madmen.
Can someone explain why is it that for Republicans talking is bad but killing is good?
Unfortunately, the MSM is dead set on keeping this race as close as possible, and subsequently, their ratings as high as possible.  Therefore, McCain will get a free pass as long as Obama holds the lead.  Coverage in this election will truly highlight just how ignorant the electorate actually is.  If no one is willing to take the few steps of figuring out what is true and what is spin, than McCain continues to have a chance.  If we get him as prez, than we deserve no better.  God help us all.
MCCAIN IS ALUFF, ELETIST WHO ONLY KNOWS WAR, WAR, WAR HUNTING PEOPLE DOWN AS HE SAID IN THE FAITH FORUM TO THE "GATES OF HELL"

PRETTY STRONG COMMENT DOES HE KNOW SOMETHING WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT WHERE THE GATES OF HELL IS AND DOES HE HAVE AN ADMISSION PASS?

MADELIN ALBRIGHT WAS ON CNN AND SAID THIS COWBOY DEPLOMACY AND TRIGGER  HAPPY BEHAVIOR IS THE WRONG POSITION FOR THE US TO TAKE.

MS. ALBRIGHT SAID MCCAIN TOOK THE BULLY PULL PIT BEFORE HE HAD A HANDLE ON THE SITUATION

WE GUESS WHEN YOU HAVE PAID RUSSIAN LOBBYISTS AND GEORGIAN LOBBYISTS RUNNING YOUR CAMPAIGN IT'S REALLY HARD TO DO THE RIGHT THING.

IF THE US DOES NOT WANT WORLD WAR III, THEY SHOULD SKIP MCCAIN ON THE BALLOT.  

McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”

McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain PRAISED THE SAME STRAGETY AS "A MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.”

In March 2004, MCCAIN said, “I’M CONFIDENT WE'RE ON THE RIGHT COURSE.”

In December 2005, MCCAIN SAID, “OVERALL, I THINK A YEAR FROM NOW WE WILL HAVE A FAIR AMOUNT OF PROGRESS IF WE STAY THE COURSE.”

NOW HE WANTS CREDIT FOR A SURGE THAT CAME AS A RESULT OF HIS FAILED POLICIES AND IGNORING THE GENERALS ON THE GROUND WHO ASKED FOR MORE TROOPS DURING THE INITIAL INVASION?

WHAT ALUFFNESS!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1279083

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google