ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Comparing camps' ad cash

Posted: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:22 AM by Carrie Dann
Filed Under:

From NBC's Carrie Dann
The two presidential campaigns spent over $15 million on TV ads in the week after the Republican National Convention, with Obama’s team airing a higher percentage of negative ads than McCain’s.

New numbers from the Wisconsin Advertising Project, the ad coding venture of the University of Wisconsin’s political science department, show that the two campaigns were almost neck-and-neck in terms of total spending, with both hitting around $7.8 million in total ad expenditures for the week. Campaign ads hitting the airwaves as McCain returned to the road after Minneapolis showed a trend away from positivism, with 77% of ads from the Democratic nominee coding negative, compared to 56% of McCain’s spots.

Another nugget worth noting: although their total spending was similar, Obama’s  campaign sponsored 97% of ads in support of its candidate, while the RNC pitched in for over half of McCain’s ads – a total of 57%.

McCain’s top spending target, with a bill of over $1.6 million for the week, was the pricy media markets of Pennsylvania, while Obama’s heftiest sum was $1.3 million shelled out in Florida.  Obama outspent McCain in red-leaning states like Virginia (where he spent $868,000 to McCain’s $312,000), North Carolina, Missouri, and North Dakota, as well Indiana and Montana – where McCain is not even up on airwaves. But McCain funneled more cash than his rival into a handful of states that lean blue, including Iowa and Minnesota, and he out-advertised Obama by more than 3:2 in Pennsylvania.

Which lucky battleground residents are getting the most saturation?   The total number of ads – including interest group placements – was highest for the week in Denver, CO, with the Detroit, Las Vegas, and Grand Rapids markets not far behind.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The Wisconsin Advertising Project needs to add a new category -- lying ads (proven by fact-checkers) -- McCain/Palin would win that one hands down!

Meanwhile, I'm glad Colorado is receiving so much attention -- we have a good chance of FINALLY going blue this time. At the least, we'll replace a retiring Repub senator with a Democrat.
Yeah, we've been seeing a lot here in PA -- from both camps.  It's nice to feel wanted.  :)

http://thepajamapundit.com/
I believe there is a distinct difference in the type of 'negative' ads by Obama as opposed to the 'negative,sleazy,vile' ads of mccain!  Big difference!
Another nugget worth noting: although their total spending was similar, Obama’s  campaign sponsored 97% of ads in support of its candidate, while the RNC pitched in for over half of McCain’s ads – a total of 57%.

HMMMM....imagine that...
Obama/Biden 08
That is Obama's way of "Changing the tone of the campaign".  77% negative ads!  That is sure "Change to Believe In"...NOT!

I have been sitting on the fence until now.  I am sick of the Palin bashing Obama supporters who think that Obama despite his inexperience is the best thing to happen to American since Ford invented the Edsel and we all know what happened with that model.  It flopped badly.
Until McCain stops LYING about Obama raising the average person's taxes in his ads, every single one of his ads should be qualified as "Negative."

If LYING in ads was the metric, I imagine McCain's percentage would far exceed his opponent.
So who has run the more negative campaign again? Obama whines and crys that it's McCain. Turns out Obama needs to look in the mirror for the answer.
"Campaign ads hitting the airwaves as McCain returned to the road after Minneapolis showed a trend away from positivism, with 77% of ads from the Democratic nominee coding negative, compared to 56% of McCain’s spots."
------------------------------------------------------
One very important point:

Obama's "negative" ads actually used John McCain's own words and votes against him.

Sometimes the truth hurts- but it's still the truth.  When was the last time anyone believed that the garbage being spewed from the McCain campaign even comes close to the truth?
McCain's negative ads are just one negative about him.
He wants to privatize social security.      Negative.
He wants to stay in Iraq.                   Negative.
He railed against habeus corpus ruling
concerning war prisoners.                   Negative.
Wants to continue Bush economics.           Negative.
He's willing to Palin in line to the
presidency.                                 Negative.
I was a republican for many years.  The party has failed in our national security measures and the economic failures are the worst I've ever seen or felt in sixty years.  I'm voting Obama.  John McCain isn't Mitt Romney, a very measured man.  I can not afford eight more years of loyalty to the GOP.
Indie woman in Denver - The Wisconsin Advertising Project needs to add a new category -- lying ads (proven by fact-checkers)

=====================

Ohh, ohh, I want to be a factchecker! Pick me, pick me!!
Shouldn't we differentiate between personal (and untrue) negative ads and those negative ads which focus on the policies/ideas of the opponent?
Obama can spend all the money he wants, it is negated by the 'free press' he gets when he is RAISING it at fundraisers like last night's Hollywood extravaganza.

Obama is relying on voter fraud to win in close states-witness the hue and cry over a non issue like checking foreclosure lists in Michigan.  While the Republican party denies doing so, Michigan, like other states, has residency requirements.  If you move after the cut off date, you vote from your old address.  If you move before that date, you must re-register in you new address.  It is very simple, really.

It is a given that in Chicago the dead will rise and vote; they do in every election.

I hope that the Justice Department is armed and ready to prosecute voter fraud this time.  It weakens our republic.
Another lie by mccain and his surrogates-  mccain believes in 'limited government' Just who has been bailing out Wall Street all week?  The government!
Which means more debt and higher taxes with a war!

Anyone who defends and supports the mcpain camp has had a lobotomy!
With the RNC's spending, McCain's acceptance of public campaign financing seems irrelevant...the RNC is making up for the shortfall. So much for McCain's holier than thou, self righteous critique against Obama's refusal of public financing.
One more thing...living in NY, I have to say, its nice not having to watch these ads.  
Funny that little grand rapids is becoming such a big name for political campaigns. Obama picked up Edward's endorsement here, and McCain/Palin are stumping here later today. Everyone talks about how bad the michigan economy is doing, but it's hard to notice on this side of the state. For outsiders to know, Grand Rapids is traditionally liberal leaning, but is surrounded in a sea of conservativism that is west michigan. Ususally detroit carries the rest of our state into the blue, but with the mass exodus of jobs from the auto industry meltdown, its no longer a guarantee.
Stock market down 300 points.  Did McCain make another speech on the economy?  Please, stick to drill or surge or POW.  Every time he talks about the economy the market goes down faster than a Vietnam era navy jet.
The ads' negativity should be measured not by the number of negative ads, but by the contents and the amount of fact twisting.
My own analysis tells me that McCain's ads were the sleaziest, continuing factually challenged ads on a far greater scale than Obama's.
Obama has more attack adds? (Ok if you say so) but how many of Obamas adds are based on truth as opposed to McCains. An attack based on truth is informative, an attack based on lies only works with the naive and uninformed. The problem for Obama is that his message is borring and long winded. He needs to sharpen it and shorten it.
See, there's the problem with Obama. He was no answers to any issues.
Paul Wislon, Hillside MI
****
See, here's the problem with you statements.  He does have answers.  He has stated his answers.  His answers are published on his website.  He has answered questions posed to him.  And yet, narrow minded sheep like yourself either cant or wont hear them, either from blind loyalty to your party or a lack of ability to actually seek out the answers.  The world isnt spoon fed to you, you have to do some research.
Let's see:  

Obama's negative ads: McCain doesn't get the economy, he's in bed with lobbyists, he's running a dishonest, cynical campaign, issues, issues issues....

McCain's negative ads:  PIGS! LIPSTICK! PITBULLS!! KINDERGARTEN SEX! LIES, LIES, LIES! DISTRACTIONS, DISTRACTIONS DISTRACTIONS!!!  I'LL SELL MY SOUL TO WIN!!

Anybody notice the difference?  Hello?  Somebody? Anybody?

Laura, Boston - you're sick of all the "Palin bashing" by Obama fans???  What about all the Palin LIES by Palin herself?  Or the lies McCain keeps spreading about Obama.  It's on the news regularly.  Even Karl Rove said that McCain has gone to far from the truth.

If you've fallen off the fence into the McCain/Palin camp because of bashing, you are clearly deluded.
It would be nice if this post explained how "negative ads" were defined.

Also, if an ad is filled with lies, it it considered "negative"?

Just askin'.
 Of course everyone on this site is defending Obama's negative ads, whining 'but they're true!'   The problem is this is the man who promised a departure from the bitter divisive politics of the past.  When will this be starting?  
I doubt that Obama had more negative ads than McCain in the same period.  But if so, his ads might have been negative, but truthful; McCain specializes in lies.
McCain has proven himself a liar. Its that simple.

He lies about Obama's energy plan, Obama's tax plan, whether he vetted his running mate, his daily support/non-support for his own immigration proposal... he even lies about his own motivation for running for president, and the "fact checker" on that one is no less than McCain himself:

"I didn't decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president...In truth, I'd had the ambition for a long time."
See, there's the problem with Obama. He was no answers to any issues. Paul Wislon, Hillside MI

Tired of hearing this pauil especially when it is Mccain who talks in genealiities and gives no specific plans or proposals on the issues. if you would listen to both canddiates you would easily hear Obama give 5 point and 6 point plans to many issues as well as state specific steps to resolve many issues. Then listen to McCain and all he says is he has experience, he is a POW, and speaks in generalities all the time when not attacking Obama. It is clear you have already made up your mind or that you just fail to listen to the candidates when they speak. In fact, people are advising Obama to stop giving so many details about the issues and his posiitons and plans and to get more simple and general in his statements. If that is their suggestion then obviously Obama is being detailed, too detailed for them.  
Sometimes the truth hurts- but it's still the truth.  When was the last time anyone believed that the garbage being spewed from the McCain campaign even comes close to the truth?
Suburban Mom paying attention, IL (Sent Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:57 AM)


Suburban Mom unfortuantly , either folks are blinded by fear or foolishness because folks do all to often believe the slime the the Republican slime factory produces. Someone today say that this week was the first time Obama talked about the Banks and lender issues. They have not been listening instead these people stand back and make factless opinions and claims. So it's up to good people like the rest of us to keep calling them on theses lies. Something The McHooverBush/PalinCheney ticket is very good at. I mean darn people they are the same pary that lied us into a WAR!!!!!!!!!
"Obama can spend all the money he wants, it is negated by the 'free press' he gets when he is RAISING it at fundraisers like last night's Hollywood extravaganza."

Seriously, you are almost making it too easy.  Check back about a month ago, August 25th to be exact.  McCain has a Hollywood fundraiser at the Beverly Hills Hilton.  They charged $50k per plate, and had numerous stars attend.  

The facts are a pain, I know, but you need to look at them first before airing your ridiculous claims.
You forgot to mention that 97% of McCain's ads contained at6 least one total fabrication.
Even Karl Rove said McCain's ads are out of bounds.  I agree with many of the comments. Lies and half truths should be counted separate. When it comes to lies McCain wins by a large margin.  His campaign has squandered honest, integrity, straight talk. Palin lies about Obama's tax plan, the teleprompter, bridge to nowhere, troopergate. John and Sarah: When you lose your credibility, you have nothing...

WAIT TILL YOU LIBS SEE THE AD WHERE OBAMA TOOK SECOND MOST MONEY FROM FANNIE MAY AND HIS MAN WHO PICKED HIS VP TOOK FORTY MILLION IN SEVERANCE PAY=THESE IDIOTS CANT FOOL US.
John McCain used to say he'd rather lose the election than run a negative campaign.

Now he says he's only running a negative campaign because Obama wouldn't come along with him to his town halls.

This is poor integrity, even for a politician, and behavior more fitting of a 7-year-old than a man over 70.

"I didn't get my way! He didn't agree to what I wanted (a format that, by the way, many pundits have noted is McCain's only strength), so I'll... I'll... I'll make up a bunch of ridiculous attack ads!"
I believe the statement.  Obama's behavior of late just exposes him for what he is--a sleazy, do anything to get elected politician from Chicago.
The Obama campaign needs to run some entertaining new ads that focus on single issues important to undecided swing voters that really aren't being addressed. They need to reduce the risk factor these voters feel about Obama and inject more uncertainty in their minds about a McCain/Palin White House. And they can do it in a way that won't be viewed as unfairly negative.
So let's stop "preaching to the choir!" Ads that make the Left Wing stand up and cheer will only alienate this audience. Remember, they don't watch Fox News or MSNBC. They don't spend hours on the internet.
Ads that ridicule their interests/way of life will drive them away. (A recent Obama ad mocked Senator McCain for not using email. Does the Obama campaign really not want the vote of anyone who doesn't have an email address? Believe it or not, folks, but it is a huge number!)
Check out the links below to see some print ads in development that focus on what I'm talking about. Send your opinions about them to BackBarack08@aol.com and let the Obama team know what you're thinking.
It's all about the undecided swing voters in a handful of States, and that has to be the focus.

http://users.aol.com/BackBarack08 /Lucky.pdf

http://users.aol.com/BackBarack08 /Coat_Hanger.pdf

http://users.aol.com/BackBarack08 /Black_Man.pdf
a $1000.00 rebate? what these rich polticians on both sides don't realize or can't coprehend is $1000.00 won't do squat to get most of us hard working Middle class people out of the holes we are in. That's barely enough to pay for gas to get us to work for the month. Suspend the outrageous taxes on gas (even for a short time). whoever could make that happen would be elected immediately.
english speaking US citizen
************

1) If you are paying $1000 a month for gas, you need a closer job.  If it's for your job, you need to expense it or get a better one.

2) Repealing any gas tax wont do squat expect make sure your highway infrastructure crumbles and 1000's of people lose their jobs.  How is that helping?  Why is that worth you getting a few more gallons?  And do you really think oil companies will lower the price?  You HAVE to pay it, we are a guarenteed market and we will pay anything to feed out need.  So where does that money go, if not to the infrastructure?  That's right, oil companies and their record profits.
See, here's the problem with you statements.  He does have answers.  He has stated his answers.  His answers are published on his website.  He has answered questions posed to him.  And yet, narrow minded sheep like yourself either cant or wont hear them, either from blind loyalty to your party or a lack of ability to actually seek out the answers.  The world isnt spoon fed to you, you have to do some research.

DV, CA (Sent Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:06 PM)

Speaking of spoon fed. Hope you have your bib on. Obama has no answers. Energy? He talks about alternative energy, something that does not exist on a large enough scale to power even a small city, let alone a country. Obama's been against drilling, then for it, then against it, then, you get the picture. Obama has not said word one about the banking problems until this week, then he's now just pointing fingers without any real plans. Obama hasn't said one word about the sub-prime market, ever. Foreign policy? He hasn't a clue. He things shaking hands with foreign leaders is foreign policy. He even hired has 300 advisors to explain it to him. Abortion? No opinion - it's above his pay grade. On and on Obama goes. But no answers.

Keep going to your messiahs web site for the answers. Obama will certainly spoon feed them right to his adoring fans. He'll even wipe your face off when he's finished.
WAIT TILL YOU LIBS SEE THE AD WHERE OBAMA TOOK SECOND MOST MONEY FROM FANNIE MAY AND HIS MAN WHO PICKED HIS VP TOOK FORTY MILLION IN SEVERANCE PAY=THESE IDIOTS CANT FOOL US.

Wake up FOOL!!!. McShame is playing you and everyone else. The guys is too old and dumb to be pres and his girlfriend is just an empty pair of heels.
She is so dumb that Bush looks smart next to her
;-D
Please telll me .is responding to attack adds concidered a attack add?While the bomber and his party have bombed the air waves with untruths,half truths,or the out and out lies that have since been debunked,would it have been better if Obama didn't respond just let all the lies happen and leave it to the msm to call out the lieing thugs.And still today the rethugs are still running there mavrick add with all the lies,all there talk about reforming washinton.The only reforming that will be done is that the Fat cats wallets will be reformed to a larger size and the rest of us wallet will be reformed to a smaller size. .
Of course everyone on this site is defending Obama's negative ads, whining 'but they're true!'   The problem is this is the man who promised a departure from the bitter divisive politics of the past.  When will this be starting?  
Just Say NO-bama
********

The humorous, and saddest, thing about people like this, is that they are so taken in that they wouldnt know the truth if it was standing naked before them.  You really have no concept of what a nagative add is.  I sincerely doubt you even watch them.  You come here over and over and say the same tired things.  The fact is, they are true.  They are mostly response ads to McCains bold face lies.  Everyone knows they are lies.  They have been confirmed lies by multiple sources.  Yet, here your are...flapping your gums, trying to be the big man.  

But, until you show a willingness to look for your own answers, you will always be the scared little kid that gives into the bully.
To Laura from Boston,

And how about Bush - the "regular" guy I'd like to have a beer with - see how he turned out?  Most people won't be able to afford a beer soon...
There are so many McCain supporters here attacking Obama for being truthful with his ads of this week (but of course not all ads of this year), challenging the Straight Talk Express' self-imposed image of truth-telling. McCain's actions reflect the tactics we have seen in President Bush and hs GOP allies and which we should be prepared to deal with should he win the presidency.
Anyone compaling of Palin-bashing believes lying is holy and acceptable, but not bashing a liar.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1410673

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google