ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC News Political Reporter



Palin advocates for special needs funds

Posted: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:20 PM by Carrie Dann
Filed Under:


From NBC/NJ's Matthew Berger

PITTSBURGH -- In her first policy address since joining the Republican ticket, Sarah Palin called for parents of special needs children to use federal funding to pick the school of their choice, and she suggested that Obama would raise taxes on federal trusts designed to pay for medical and education costs for disabled children.

VIDEO:  Sarah Palin tells a Pennsylvania audience that Barack Obama's tax proposals will have "serious and harmful consequences" on families of special needs children, due to his "ideological commitment to higher taxes."

“In a McCain/Palin administration, we’re gonna put the educational choices for special needs children in the right hands, in the hands of the parents and the good responsible caretakers,” she said. “Under reforms that I will lead as vice president, the parents and caretakers of children with physical or mental disabilities will be able to send that boy or girl to the school of their choice, public or private.”

Palin also called for full federal funding of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, phasing in an additional $15 billion in funding over five years. She said funds could be found by reprioritizing the federal budget and ending earmarks.

Palin wrapped the policy proposal in a personal appeal Friday, speaking of her six month old son, Trig, who has Down Syndrome, and her nephew, Karcher, who is autistic, and placing herself as an advocate for families with children with special needs.

And, she added, those families are concerned about the tax policies of her opponent.

“They fear that Sen. Obama’s tax increase will have serious and harmful consequences,” she said. “And they’re right because the burden that his plan would pose upon these families is just one more example of how many plans can be disrupted and how many futures can be placed at risk and how many people can suffer when the power to tax is misused.”

Palin said Obama would raise taxes on federal trusts that families establish to pay for medical and educational costs for children with physical or mental disabilities.

“We’ll protect the savings and the earnings of American families and we’ll allow more of that investment and the prioritization via our own families to make the difference here,” Palin said.

Palin delivered the remarks at an airport hotel ballroom, filled with families with children with special needs. Throughout the speech, several babies could be heard and at least one was running around the aisles and behind the seats. At the beginning of her remarks, Palin said not to worry about the fussy children. “That’s the sound of life,” she said.

Palin proposes allowing parents to use federal funding from IDEA to choose a school for their special needs child, including private and religious schools. If elected, the administration would direct the Department of Education to augment the rules, allowing federal funds to follow children from one school to another, if the state funding does the same.

McCain senior policy advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin said the plan would not mandate private or parochial schools to accommodate children with special needs. And, Palin said, the question of school choice for special needs children should not be tied down by the larger voucher question.

“Like John McCain, I’m a believer in providing more school choice for families. And the responsibility for the welfare of children rests ultimately with mothers and fathers, and the power to choose should be theirs as well,” she said. “But this larger debate of public policy should not be permitted to hinder the progress of special needs students.”

Under IDEA, signed by President Ford in 1975, the federal government was responsible for 40 percent of special needs education. But that mandate has never been met. Palin’s proposal would increase the federal commitment by $3 billion a year over five years, for an eventual total of $26 billion.

Palin’s proposal also includes improved assistance for families with infants and toddlers with special needs and better services to students with disabilities in high schools and community colleges.

Palin has said at campaign rallies that she expects to focus on families with special needs as vice president, along with energy independence and government reform. Campaign officials suggested Friday that the project was a priority for her, and would therefore be exempted from a government freeze on domestic discretionary spending, which she and McCain have advocated for on the campaign trail.

“We think this is important enough for the next vice president to stand up and talk about,” Holtz-Eakin said. “If we think it’s important enough to stand up and talk about, we ought to fund it.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I am as against vouchers for special ed as I am for public ed.  No robbing the taxpayers money for private instruction for the special needs children of the rich.
"Sinster" Sarah did not make a policy speech, just another rambling bit of nonsense that should not have been shown on MSNBC tv.

Yet another hypocritical lie from "Sinner" Sarah who now wants to have federal funds help her with her special needs child.

If she is so gung ho for special needs children then why did she slash Alaska's budget for Special Olympics?  She's just pandering to get elected and once she's in office she'll drop the additional funding for special needs children.  Way too late for any repugnant one to say they care about special needs children when they've consistently cut funding for this group.

Go Obama/Biden 08/12!
Oh, is that why she cut funding for special needs?  With advocates like her, who needs enemies?
Does this for some reason appear to be more of a policy appeal for a Palin ticket in 2012 more than something for the McCain/Palin ticket to enforce when they are in office.  My question is where has the funding been for children with disabilities over the last eight years.  

And to flat out state that this influx of funds would not be part of the spending freeze that McCain is so adament about says more to what McCain said of Obama.  He stated Obama would say anything to get elected.  Sounds a lot like the pot calling the kettle black to me.

I think this "policy" speech was more a setup for the next election cycle where the "base" for the Republicans will look for a Palin head of the ticket.  Don't be surprised if that ticket sounds alot like the Bush 2000 ticket.
So tell me this: If you are such an advocate, why did you cut the funding for special needs children up in Alaska?

And where is all this money going to come from after your knucklehead boss puts a freeze on ALL spending. And don't forget, he is going to get the government to buy all these overpriced mortgages with all our tax money so even if there wasn't a freeze, where is the money going to come from?
She can start that in the state of Alaska in November and if it works then the lower 48 will adopt it.  We were supposed to fully fund No Child Left Behind also but you see were that ended up.

Even if you can send you child to the school of your choice, how do you get them there?  How do they get home?  Does the school supply transportation or does me or my wife have to quit our jobs just to drive our children to school each day?

Why can't the school in my area be fixed?
How convenient. I thought I remember reading where in Alaska she went against funding for special ed. This was, of course, before baby Trig came along.

This woman is the biggest hypocrite I've seen in a long time.  So sick of her. How many more days left?
HA!!! This from a woman who slashed the special olympics budget in Alaska!  Yeah, right, she's real concerned with special needs children.
Actually - All special education classes need to be fully funded by the federal government so as to free up the money spent by states. States need to pay their teachers and staff more in line with their years of expensive education and spend more on the average student. As it is right now too much of each districts budget is consumed by special education at the expense of 90%of the average student. Let's get fair: if the federal governemtn is going to mandate more special needs classes, they need to pay for it. Vouchers are never the answer - fairness is...claudette dubois, culver city school district
So does this make Palin a Tax & Spend liberal looking to buy votes?  That is what it is called anytime a Democrat advocates for more funding to address the legitimate problems of "the few".
I thought conservatives were for less government?  Isn't that why Palin cut many $$$ to special olympics as governor of the State of Alaska?  What's happening now is out-and-out pandering.
Squwaaaak!  Obama is bad Obama is bad!
Liberals hate America!
I'm a queen!

Elect a uniter.  Vote Obama/Biden
Who in the hell made Palin an expert on or the lone supporter of children with special needs. There are bloggers on here who have raised children with special needs for years and know more about such childrenand their needs in their little finger than Palin could ever hope to learn in that empty brain of hers.

She is using this issue and her child born six months ago wit hdowns syndrome to gain sympathy votes. That is obsolutely clear.

Every American with any common sense and a heart supports children with special needs and are willing to see programs funded for these children. That is except those who think spending 10 billion a month in Iraq is more important.

The more I watch this woman and listen to the garbage she spews the more sick I get of her. And for those who still support her, go talk to someone who has spent years raising a child with special needs and then you might understand the issue and how these children always need our help, along with the thousands and millions of children starving to death in this world.  
Has there been another candidate in history who used their children to campaign as much as Sarah Palin?

And to think that Senator Obama was criticized for doing a family interview including his kids.

Things that make you go hmmmmm.
How many times have you actually seen her hold her infant son?  She claims to be the expert on special needs, but how long has she actually have had to deal with the issues of a speciali needs child?  It would be hard pressed for me to give a nod to that claim that she knows what it takes.  Had she have say 5 10 or even 15 years with a child with needs then yes but six months and barely even seen holding her son when she has a chance, come on lets get real here.
So explain WHY, Sarah, that this ISN'T a form of socialism? Also, you've had a Down's baby for what? 4-5 months now? This gives you experience with Special Needs kids...how? You don't even take care of Trig now; everytime I see you on TV you're handing him off to someone else as soon as you can. Isn't it in the beginning with special needs kids that they need the GREATEST care? Apparently, your political ambitions outweigh the needs of Trig, huh? I understand..... you have the same ability to be a spokesperson for special needs kids as you do on your foreign affairs experience of seeing Russia from your front porch....it's ALL bull, isn't it? That's how WE view it.                             Obama/Biden '08/'12
I feel compassion for little Trig—but I notice that Sarah Palin's agenda is ALL about Sarah Palin at our expense.

She is trying to divide our nation into "good" and "bad" Americans, small towns vs. urban areas, rich against poor, etc.

I have not heard one inclusive and intelligent idea out of her mouth yet!

She and McCain deserve each other but WE DO NOT DESERVE THEM.
Is she in favor of supporting it like she did the special olympics in her state? Cutting the funds in half. The press should ask her this. Oh I forgot not allowed to ask her questions. And Obama is the one that needs to open up LOL. If this is the best the Republicans can offer the country in leadership then I hope the congress, senate, and the White house is all Dems for the next few years. I would love to see an IQ test of the typical Palin supporter I douth it would hit double digits.
No coincidence that the campaign puts her special needs front and center on a day that she and her husband are to give depositions?  

Play the sympathy card.

Not buying it.  
Sarah Palin is an insult to smart woman everywhere.  There is only one reason to vote for her - individual ignorance.  She isn't qualified to run a 7/11.
Yes, we need more special needs funding. Somewhere out there is an underachieving child like George W, Bush who could become president some day.

Just once I would like to hear Caribou Barbie or McFossil envoke the name 'George the President',
Sure sounds great but kind of hard to do when you're advocating an across the board spending freeze isn't it?

Obama/Biden 08!  
So does this make us feel any better about what kind of president she would be if something were to happen to John McCain? I think not.
I am confused -- didn't Palin CUT funds for Special Ed in Alaska?

Why isn't she being called on her possible flip/flop - possible hypocrisy?
Thats right Adam, special needs children need to be in the public schools , how else will they learn to hate Amreica, and who they should blame for their problems?
How does she stand there and lie this way. So what she is saying is that all these special needs families make more than $250,000 per year? How are people so blinded and hoodwinked? Obama's tax plan does more for these families than McCain's does. Oh and I love the way her program will be exempt from the fake spending freeze. There are plenty of other programs they refer to as domestic discretionary spending that they will freeze that affect way more people than this program does. The spending freeze, another gimmick.

She cut the budget in Alaska for the special olympics. She could care less about anyone else's special needs kids or anyone else's kids for that matter, just that they have them whether they want to or not or can or can't or are raped or a victim of incest.

This woman makes me sick.
This is BS why didn't she try to do any of this in Alaska?

Are you afraid of getting back more money from Obama's plan? Thought so
But the real question is, "Did Sarah look nice?" after spending $22,800 for the first two weeks of October on a make-up artist.  With over $150,000 in clothes, we are now in the neighborhood of $175,000. How dumb can that be.

We are coming up on the weekend and no big game changer today.  With 10 days left, McCain/Palin are running out of time.  Their best bet is to end their campaign with some dignity.  
But, I thought that, according to McCain-Palin:
assistance = "spreading the wealth around" = socialism

Did I miss something?

hmmmmmm...little Ms. Hypocrisy strikes again!

I'm all for assisting those with special needs.  Just calling a spade a spade--by the McCain-Palin definition.
Lovely sentiment, poorly-conceived fix.  

She loves her son, obviously, but I have a bit of a problem understanding how Sarah Palin is so "experienced" with special needs children's issues.  Her son is only 6-7 months old and she has spent three of them campaigning.  Where did she stand on advocating for this issue *before* she knew she would have a Downs Syndrome child?  

Still, to be fair, she has more experience with this than she does with virtually any *other* issue.  Let's see if she pursues it back home as governor starting Nov. 5.
Palin you have to be the biggest fraud with all the lies and miss-infomation.No one running for office has spoken out more for the changes in our current education then Obama.Did you forget that you cut funding for special olympics in your state?I for one am sick of you running your pig lips ,Always blaming someone else or lie about there positions.I guess i've heard enough of what you spew.Your stump speech,your lies,your uninformed ,your lack of any morals,you miss piggy are not fit for office,you are not ready to take over anything out side of a white sheet meeting.
<<"...will be able to send that boy or girl to the school of their choice, public or private.">>

Sounds a lot like No Child Left Behind, which was...oh yeah...a colossal FAILURE.

You lose, Sarah.  Try again.
BaBaBooie
If Sara had no special needs child, would this even be an issue?  Not to mention the fact that this is the FIRST DIRECT POLICY stance that she has taken...eleven days before the election.
McCain forever. Obama NEVER.
ANOMALY (Sent Friday, October 24, 2008 1:02 PM) (previous thread)

I'll say this once again and hope that this time it gets posted.  Whoever is impersonating me ... please, please, please at least TRY to be more creative.  

I do have a reputation to maintain, after all.  Sheesh.
Oh yeah, I forgot something.

How many more "exemptions" from McCain's promised government "budget freeze" are they planning?  Seems like there's going to be little left to freeze by the time they stop adding to the list he gave during the debates.
as a teacher I agree what you will have are the poor parents of special needs suffering froma lack of funding.  as always under republicans it is pull your self up and leave others behind that are not able to.  what do they not understand about the fact that when the middle class is strong we are all strong.  I guess me thinking long term is a Socialist value.
Under McCains plan she cannot get funds for special needs as that is a necessary expense.  McCain clearly stated that under his administration they would immediatly sieze all spending except for military and elderly care.   Obama even pointed this out to McCain in the debate.  Therefore, Sarah, you will get nothing under McCains plan.  These are facts!
And speaking of special needs kids, From KDKA:

http://kdka.com/

"A Pittsburgh police commander says a volunteer for the McCain campaign who reported being robbed and attacked near a bank ATM in Bloomfield has confessed to making up the story. Police say charges will be filed. More details to follow."
Is anyone beside me watching the "Who won the debate" percentages go down?  Me thinks Fix news sent over their cronies to vote!!  Not going change a thing tho.  What with all the Repubs moving over to Obama's side!!!!

Obama/Biden 08/12
Palin’s proposal also includes improved assistance for families with infants and toddlers with special needs and better services to students with disabilities in high schools and community colleges.
*******************************************************

This makes my stomach turn.  No, not the actual proposal -- the fact that Palin is clearly using her son as a political prop.

Ick.

http://thepajamapundit.com/
Just think of the education Palin's special needs child could have gotten had she spent the $150.000 on
him instead of clothes for the family. A family thats parents earn good wages,a family that could afford to buy there own plane tickets & clothes. I a soooo sick of her lies. As ayor se out spent her predisore by 55%
and as Governor she out spent by 31% in just under a 2 yr period. Not counting all the earmarks she took. She is no dummy she is just pretended to plead ignorance.
So...no spending freeze then, McCain?  Or did you just mean freezing of spending that doesnt benefit you and your cronies?

Hypocrits
finally someone with a real clue about educating people with special needs.
It is disgusting the way the McCain campaign thinks nothing of politizing and exploiting anything and anyone sector.Shame on them.
I am a special needs parent. You do not know what you are talking about. What planet are you from Adam?
I am confused, didn't both McCain and Palin say that they would do an across the board freeze on Federal Funding, which included Department of Education? MSNBC can you call them on this~~~ Please!!! Remember the hatchet?
Let's not forget that Ms. Palin ELECTED to bring a Down's baby into the world.  Most couples faced with this prospect, and the expected enormous burden on resources (theirs, others), have the moral courage to let go of their damaged fetus, although the hurt must be tremendous.   The same reality bears down on families that decide not to squander Jamie's college education fund on grandpa's last 6 months of life.   Economics forces its way into medical decisionmaking, and I think Sarah Palin is operating strictly from a position of moral comfort.   She's holier than thou.  "Sure, Todd and I decided to have a special needs baby, and you guys can help us care for it, right?  You betcha!".


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1590106

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google