ABOUT FIRST READ

First Read is an analysis of the day's political news, from the NBC News political unit. First Read is updated throughout the day, so check back often.

Chuck Todd, NBC Political Director

Mark Murray, NBC Deputy Political Director

Domenico Montanaro, NBC Political Researcher



Orszag named OMB director

Posted: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:56 AM by Domenico Montanaro

From NBC's Domenico Montanaro

As expected, Peter Orszag, director of the Congressional Budget Office, was named as President-elect Obama's Office of Management and Budget Director, the Obama transition team announced today.

Rob Nabors, currently Clerk and staff director of the House Appropriations Committee, was named Orszag's deputy. Nabors served in the OMB during the Clinton administration as a senior adviser to the director.

“In these challenging times, when we are facing both rising deficits and a sinking economy, budget reform is not an option," Obama said in a statement. "It is an imperative. We cannot sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a politician, lobbyist, or interest group.  We simply cannot afford it. This isn’t about big government or small government. It’s about building a smarter government that focuses on what works. That is why I will ask my team to think anew and act anew to meet our new challenges. We will go through our federal budget -- page by page, line by line -- eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way."

Short bios, per the transition team, after the jump:

Peter Orszag, Office of Management and Budget Director
Peter Orszag currently serves as the Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), overseeing the agency's work in providing objective, nonpartisan, and timely analyses of economic and budgetary issues--supervising the numerous analytical papers and cost estimates that the agency produces and, to present the results, frequently testifying before the Congress. Under his leadership, the agency has significantly expanded its focus on areas such as health care and climate change. In previous government service, Orszag served as Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and as a staff economist and then Senior Advisor and Senior Economist at the President's Council of Economic Advisers.  Orszag was the Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution where he authored or edited numerous books and papers. Orszag graduated summa cum laude in economics from Princeton University and obtained a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics, which he attended as a Marshall scholar.

Rob Nabors, Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director
Rob Nabors currently serves as the 13th Clerk and Staff Director of the House Appropriations Committee. He is responsible for the hiring, and direction of the majority staff of the committee and for recommending overall legislative strategies with respect to discretionary spending to committee Democrats and the House Democratic Leadership. Nabors joined the Appropriations Committee in 2001. Prior to coming to the Appropriations Committee, Nabors served in the Office of Management and Budget in the Executive Office of the President as the Senior Advisor to the Director and as the Assistant Director for Administration and Executive Secretary. Nabors is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame, where he received degrees in Government and Computer Applications. He received a Masters Degree in Political Science from the University of North Carolina.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

You know what I like most about President-Elect Obama?

The fact that he makes PLANS. When you HAVE a plan, you can ADJUST a plan.


He then hires people to carry out HIS PLANS.

I also like how people are being hired based on their QUALIFICATIONS to perform a JOB. Not just how much they gave or who their daddy is.

So tired of government by "gut feeling".

It gave me indigestion.
Barack promised to change the way that DC works and this sounds like a prudent move. We all know that years of pork and programs kept running by their admins. inspite of their marginal performance is the rule, not the exception.

It is way past time for our representatives to be concerned about how they spend the people's money. Let's see what happens as the Obama admin takes charge.  

He's got a lot to pick through to find cuts.  Not everyone will like them.  It is time to make some choices.  The question is can he find enough programs to cut, downsize or reorganize into other to make any kind of difference.  
President-elect Obama is finding ways to agree with you.
I really wish those who voted Obama; would stop complain that change is not happening.  President-elect Obama has always stressed the need sought to find a common ground to move the party and the country forward. As a result, we don’t allow his effectiveness of divisness or the opportunity to at least try to overcome this mess. Have confidence.

Bush, on his way, wants more publicly financed private sector. He doesn’t care. It’s kind of like getting the shaft instead of an economic stimulus with Bush.

As with any problem, it must be first identified before it can be resolved. PE Obama has a pretty good idea of what will work and what will place a drag on the economy. His brilliance in placing other bright and learned people in his cabinet will lend credence to his abilities during this perfect storm of economic woes.

No, it's not gonna be easy and it certainly won't be quick and painless, but at least PE Obama and his team of advisors have some idea of what is wrong and how to fix it. Secr. Paulson and Prez Bush appear to have no idea how the economy failed and even less of an idea about how to fix it. Neither of them evoke any confidence to the American people and Wall Street appeared to have no confidence in their ability either.

Jan. 20th can't come soon enough!
BHO -  "It is an imperative. We cannot sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a politician, lobbyist, or interest group."

So those Farm subsidies, we can scratch those off the list of things we're going to pay for? I'm sure the Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, and Iowa farmers (all states Obama carried), will be  delighted to hear the news.
This is one of those specific campaign promises Obama made that not only still makes sense in the current economic crisis, but is, as he says, IMPERATIVE. If at all possible, he should reach across the aisle and get McCain involved. It's just the kind of thing Mr I-hate-porkbarrel-spending would be good at.
You know what I like most about President-Elect Obama?

The fact that he makes PLANS.

---------------

You obviously don't have a clue what a "Plan" is. Obama is still in campaign mode, making speeches just to hear himself talk. At some point he has to say what programs he will cut. That's when the the proverbial rubber meets the road, and that's when there will be a plan. Then will see who controls Washington, Obama, or the lobbyists, the interest groups, or the polititians. My bet is on the latter. For example, have Obama try cutting something in Pelosis or Reids state/district. Lets see how far that goes.
That's their problem.
I hope Obama does a top to botton review of the the review process.  Every President since Jimmy Carter has enacted new procedures to review government programs - while never repealing any of the previous review steps.  Agencies and programs are currently over-burdened with review processes.  

We need some agency to review the reviewers and evaluate the evaluators, so some of the duplication of efforts related to program reviews can be eliminated.  No one wants to stick their neck out and cut any ineffective reviews procedures because they might be thought of as "not a tough manager trying ferret out ineffiencies".

Ever heard of the OMB process called PARTS?  The entire evaluation procedure needs to cut - and a new one developed.
FARMER TED, IOWA, Yeah if you are a millionaire farmer that makes over 2.5 million a year and still gets that subsidy that you aren't supposed to be getting, then kiss it good bye. It was for the family farms, the small farms, not the MEGA farms, that's what he is talking about.

I am sure they didn't vote for him anyway, just like you didn't. I am also pretty sure you aren't a Farmer and you aren't from Iowa....lol
"This isn’t about big government or small government. It’s about building a smarter government that focuses on what works. That is why I will ask my team to think anew and act anew to meet our new challenges."
Is that why Hillary is Secretary of State? Give me a break.
Note to Farmer Ted -- I don't believe Obama has identified any specific cuts he would make, so don't get your feathers all ruffled yet.
Am having a hard time with the economy, we were suspose to see the end to Pres. Bushs tax breaks for the rich, yes the rich compared to the rest of us. History shows tax increases improve the economy, you can start with FDR , Ronny Reagan, Bill Clinton, it allways ends up by getting us out of the hole and back in the black. This is the one promise Obama made that I want to see through frution, also close Guatanimo, and end the stupid Iraq war. My feelings are hurt I wanted his promises to be good. I still have faith in his judgement and think he will rethink
the Bush tax cuts again. It wont hurt the rich and it will help our bottom line.
marty
Farmer Ted in Iowa, would I be wrong to assume you don't have a problem with millionare farmers who probably didn't vote against their own interest by supporting a nom they knew would probably call foul on all that "growing for green" ("and I ain't talking eco here")?
Obama should cut a lot of government programs and tighten the criteria and background checks on all people who are eligible for any of the approved programs. There is far too much abuse in the federal and state programs by people bending the rules and stretching things to qualify. Millions are involved in this kind of practice nationwide.
No president elect in history has ever acted like they were going to start running the country after elected. It's amazing that Obama is actually planning to be President, unlike his forerunners, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Regan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, etc. Finally a real leader. A president we can be proud of.
It is nice to see President Elect Obama have a plan, and has thought about who will help make his plans work successfully. His Press Conference today was, well formed, well spoken, and well thought out. The GOP/RNC, and their supporters are probably very confused by this concept. The idea of having an  intelligent President really scares the heck out of the GOP/RNC. The program that Obama wants to cut makes great economic sense. The "rich get richer" philosophies of the "Do It Yourselfers" (DIY's). When the middle class are picking up their economic tab are over. That is fact!
Trust me, Farmer Ted, Barack did not carry Indiana by winning the farm vote.  He won in the cities and university towns.
So those Farm subsidies, we can scratch those off the list of things we're going to pay for? I'm sure the Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, and Iowa farmers (all states Obama carried), will be  delighted to hear the news.
Farmer Ted, Iowa (Sent Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:29 PM)
----------------------------------------------------

With the food demand nowadays?  Why again do we pay farmers money on top of what they make for crops?  Also I would dare say that we make corporate farms non-eligible for subsidies.
>>>We will go through our federal budget -- page by page, line by line -- eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way.
==========
This, folks, is what is called using a scalpel instead of a sledge-hammer.

So far, Obama is on-track to accomplish quite a bit in his first few months in office, barring any national crisis.  He's not going to get everything he's proposing, but so far he's accomplished more in just shaping up his team than Bush has in his first 100 days in office.

On a personal note, I'm noticing that even some of my Republican friends are starting to come around.  They see the value in a moderate, pragmatic approach to governing.  These are the people that the GOP has forgotten.

BTW, GLAD TO HAVE YOU BACK ON COUNTDOWN, KEITH O.

56 Days Until Inauguration Day!
http://jawillie.blog.com

Iowa Ted.....Subsidies has always had people that don't farm scratching there heads.While todays news has stated that 49 million has been paid to farmers that should not have gotten the money.These people are multi-millionairs.Some making more then 2.5 million a year.It would be one thing if these people were mom and pop operations, but that is not the case.One getting paid owns a pro sports team,he collected 200.000,in 03,04,05,and 06.others getting paid where,"top executives of major financial service firm,insurance executives,and former executive of a technology firm.Why are these people getting these sweet deals.Lack of oversight,management problems,the USDA hasn't a clue even who is getting paid.This sounds like a good place to start.I'll bet most of these farms that the owners don't even live in the state the land is in.
He never once said anything about taking away farm aid "Farmer Ted". Your subsidies will simply work better than they did before and you'll probably have better aid since farming is vital to the country's infrastructure. Don't be an idiot and raise useless points if you have nothing to stand on just because your mad McCain lost. Get over it. Move on.
Farmer Ted... You started your comment with 'BHO,' which means that not only are you not an Obama supporter, but you will try to smear anything he does.  The rest of your comment confirmed that, since you took PART of a quote and tried to convince people that it's the truth.

Since I heard the news conference on the radio, I know what the statement was... to paraphrase - those farmers who currently earn too much to receive the farm subsidies, but get them anyway, will no longer get them.  See, the farm subsidies program has income limits, although these have been ignored by the people paying them out.  As I recall, the quote included 'those millionaire farmers making over the $2.5 million dollar limit will no longer receive subsidies.'

It's been said by many people... the election was on November 4th, and today is November 25th.  Stop trying to keep Obama from getting elected... the election is over.
BHO -  "It is an imperative. We cannot sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a politician, lobbyist, or interest group."

So those Farm subsidies, we can scratch those off the list of things we're going to pay for? I'm sure the Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, and Iowa farmers (all states Obama carried), will be  delighted to hear the news.
Farmer Ted, Iowa (Sent Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:29 PM)

Farm subsidies for millionaires is what he was talking about. I don't think he mentioned anything about your fixed and inflated prices.
He never once said anything about taking away farm aid "Farmer Ted". Your subsidies will simply work better than they did before and you'll probably have better aid since farming is vital to the country's infrastructure. Don't be an idiot and raise useless points if you have nothing to stand on just because your mad McCain lost. Get over it. Move on.

enough lies, read a book (Sent Tuesday, November 25, 2008 1:31 PM)

Here's another one. They fall under the spell of Obama speeches, but they never make the connection to what Obama says (which is a lot) and what he does (which is nothing). What Obama supporters have to get used to in short order is that everyone doesn't love Barack, and when he finally does something, Obama is not going to be the popular guy they believed him to be. It's at the point we can all say to them, "Just get over it".

As I look across the political landscape I can see no one better than PE Obama to right the many wrongs of the non regulated Bush administration. When problems are large, one can/must trust God and their leaders to address these problems.  

In a way I am hopeful that these issues are correctable and I'm a bit angry that the ecomony is in such disrepair.  Yes, I am furstrated that farm subsidies may be put on the shelf and disappointed that health insurance may have to wait.  

I have little compassion for the CEO's who mismanaged the auto industry or the CEO's of the banks who made bad loans.  I do care about the people on main street who are losing their jobs, can't pay their mortgage, or will not have enough money to provide a Christmas for their children.  The reason I trust PE Obama is that he does care about the middle class and is working to find stability in the economy.  As I watch him work, I see a President who, if given some needed time, will do us all proud.
Ginger, Washington, DC:  

Please send your excellent suggestion to the Obama Transition Team at change.gov.  They are actively seeking ideas like yours to help identify areas they will need to address.
Note to Farmer Ted -- I don't believe Obama has identified any specific cuts he would make, so don't get your feathers all ruffled yet.

Indie Woman in Denver (Sent Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:51 PM)

That's the point IWiD. Obama never has specifics. And when he finally does, you're going to see who really runs the show in Washington. And it's not Obama.
Change is a phenomenom that can take several different forms.  One way to implement change is to keep/hire the best and brightest, but change the underlying philosophy of governing and, hence, the marching orders.  This appears to be what President-Elect Obama is doing and I support it wholeheartedly.  We need people who know how to make the existing system work so they can achieve immediate goals, but who are also change agents that want to implement a better system in the long run.

This will take time.  The man isn't even in office yet and he has figured out a way to be President without actually being The President -- yet.  I like his focus on jobs -- this is ultimately the key.  If people are working, it means money is flowing into the hands of you and I.

I agree with those who advocate enlisting Senator McCain as Pork Barrel Watchdog-in-Chief...give the man a red pen and let him go to town!!
A Phd. from the London School of Economics. Bartlet for America!

P.S. Viva "Hot Tub" Chuck Todd!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1688532

First Read e-mail alerts


Sign up for First Read alerts
The first place for key political news and analysis

Syndicate This Site

Add First Read to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google